Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2021 Oct 18;40(21):3591–3598. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00472

The Effect of Pyridine-2-thiolate Ligands on the Reactivity of Tungsten Complexes toward Oxidation and Acetylene Insertion

Riccardo Bondi , Miljan Z Ćorović , Michael Buchsteiner , Carina Vidovič , Ferdinand Belaj , Nadia C Mösch-Zanetti †,*
PMCID: PMC8579403  PMID: 34776581

Abstract

graphic file with name om1c00472_0006.jpg

Intending to deepen our understanding of tungsten acetylene (C2H2) chemistry, with regard to the tungstoenzyme acetylene hydratase, here we explore the structure and reactivity of a series of tungsten acetylene complexes, stabilized with pyridine-2-thiolate ligands featuring tungsten in both +II and +IV oxidation states. By varying the substitution of the pyridine-2-thiolate moiety with respect to steric and electronic properties, we examined the details and limits of the previously reported intramolecular nucleophilic attack on acetylene followed by the formation of acetylene inserted complexes. Here, we demonstrate that only the combination of high steric demand and electron-withdrawing features prevents acetylene insertion. Nevertheless, although variable synthetic approaches are necessary for their synthesis, tungsten acetylene complexes can be stabilized predictably with a variety of pyridine-2-thiolate ligands.

Introduction

Tungsten is the metal of choice for several challenging enzymatic reactions.1 Besides being in the active site of the metalloenzymes that catalyze redox reactions, it is also essential for the function of acetylene hydratase (AH). This is a unique example of a tungstoenzyme catalyzing the nonredox hydration of acetylene to acetaldehyde.15 This reaction is the first metabolic step of the mesophilic bacterium Pelobacter acetylenicus, which consumes acetylene as its only carbon and energy source.2 The only other known enzyme that accepts acetylene as a substrate is nitrogenase, which reduces acetylene to ethylene.6 The mechanism of the catalysis of AH remains elusive, as there are no reported crystal structures of the enzyme containing substrate or any inhibitor. Since one of the mechanistic ideas of AH suggests coordination of acetylene to the tungsten(IV) center,712 we aim to synthesize and understand tungsten acetylene adducts with ligands similar to those in tungstoenzymes.13,14

The first tungsten(II) acetylene species bearing dithiocarbamate ligands was reported in 1978;15 thereafter, only a few other W–C2H2 adducts have been synthesized.1626 For example, Templeton et al. reported a tungsten(IV) oxo acetylene complex containing an N-donor boron-based scorpionate ligand.20 In our group, the use of bioinspired S,N-bidentate ligands, such as SPhoz (2-(4′4′-dimethyloxazoline-2′-yl)thiophenolate),21 PyS (pyridine-2-thiolate),24 and 6-MePyS (6-methylpyridine-2-thiolate),26 allows the preparation of W(II) and W(IV) complexes and ensures a sulfur-rich environment, more closely resembling the one in the native enzyme. Additionally, complexes bearing those S,N-bidentate ligands allowed for important insight into the nature of the W–C2H2 chemistry. For instance, [WO(C2H2)(SPhoz)2] is capable of reversible binding of C2H2 with the release of acetylene being triggered by irradiation.21 In addition, coordination and subsequent insertion of a second molecule of C2H2 into the tungsten–nitrogen bond take place in [W(CO)(C2H2)(PyS)2] showing that the alkyne is activated toward the reaction with nucleophiles. The acetylene insertion was studied using C2D2 and revealed coordination of the second acetylene before insertion.24 This represents the first example of a nucleophilic attack on a W-coordinated C2H2. Similar behavior has previously been observed for tungsten complexes but only with substituted alkynes.2734 To sterically prevent the insertion from taking place, and to favor the attack from an external nucleophile, we introduced a methyl group in position 6 of the PyS ligand. The resulting complex [W(CO)(C2H2)(6-MePyS)2] also reacts with the second molecule of acetylene, but insertion occurs only partially. Moreover, nucleophilic attack of PMe3 on coordinated acetylene was observed for W(II) and W(IV) complexes bearing 6-MePyS ligands leading to carbyne and vinyl complexes, respectively.26

Herein, we explore the influence of different pyridine-2-thiolate ligands, namely, 4-methylpyridine-2-thiolate (4-MePyS), 3-chloropyridine-2-thiolate (3-ClPyS), and 5-nitro-6-methylpyridine-2-thiolate (5-NO2-6-MePyS) (Figure 1), on the oxidation and acetylene insertion reactivity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Pyridine-2-thiolates employed for the preparation of W complexes: (a) previously explored in W acetylene chemistry;24,26 (b) no coordination to W observed.

Results and Discussion

Choice of Ligands

Ligand design is based on PyS and 6-MePyS which previously allowed the preparation of tungsten acetylene complexes of the types [W(CO)(C2H2)(SN)2] and [WO(C2H2)(SN)2], (SN= bidentate pyridine-2-thiolate moiety).24,26 To investigate the insertion reaction, various substituents at the pyridine heterocycle were introduced as displayed in Figure 1. Since the electronic effects of substituents in positions 2, 4, or 6 in pyridine are known to be similar,35 we chose 4-MePyS for comparison with 6-MePyS to elucidate whether the insertion is prevented for electronic or steric reasons.36,37 The introduction of a nitro group in position 5 in 6-MePyS increases the electron-withdrawing properties, rendering the nitrogen donor less nucleophilic. A similar approach was used by introducing a chloro substituent at the PyS moiety. With both ligands, a reduced reactivity toward insertion is expected. The initial attempts to introduce the Cl to position 6 of the PyS moiety were not successful, so 3-ClPyS was prepared instead. Moreover, coordination of the known ligands 6-tert-butylpyridine-2-thiolate (6-tBuPyS)38 and 6-trifluoromethylpyridine-2-thiolate (6-CF3PyS) to the tungsten(II) precursor [WBr2(CO)3(MeCN)2] was attempted, but it turned out to be unsuccessful due to steric hindrance of the large groups in position 6.

Introduction of the Ligand

Following the synthetic procedure for complexes employing the ligands PyS and 6-MePyS,24,26 the reaction of the tungsten precursor [WBr2(CO)3(MeCN)2] with 2.1–2.2 equiv of each ligand gives the tricarbonyl complex of the general formula [W(CO)3(SN)2] (Scheme 1). After filtration, complexes [W(CO)3(4-MePyS)2] (1a) and [W(CO)3(3-ClPyS)2] (1b) were isolated, crystallized, and characterized (see Supporting Information (SI)). In contrast, isolation and characterization of the tricarbonyl complex bearing two 5-NO2-6-MePyS ligands were not possible due to decomposition under the experimental conditions. 1H NMR spectra of 1a and 1b show the presence of only one ligand set due to fluxionality of the tricarbonyl moiety at room temperature, which is in accordance with the literature.39 Also, IR values related to CO stretching (2011, 1881 cm–1 for 1a; 2014, 1932, 1906 cm–1 for 1b) are in the same range as those known for W(II) tricarbonyl complexes.40

Scheme 1. Synthetic Procedures for Complexes 1ab, 2ac, 3ab, and 4ac.

Scheme 1

For all the reactions with C2H2, an excess was used (1 atm). (i) Only complex 2b can be obtained in moderate yield from 3b via the release of the inserted acetylene (η1-C2H2); (ii) with complex 2c, no acetylene insertion occurs.

However, on the way to tungsten oxo acetylene complexes, the isolation and purification of tricarbonyl compounds turned out to be an unnecessary step. Indeed, in most of the cases, we chose an in situ approach in which the initial reaction of [WBr2(CO)3(MeCN)2] with the ligand salt is immediately followed by the treatment with acetylene.

Reaction with Acetylene

The reaction solutions of tricarbonyl complexes were purged with acetylene and subsequently stirred, after which the products were isolated as described in the SI. Exposing a toluene solution of 1a to an acetylene atmosphere (1 atm) leads to the formation of [W(CO)(C2H2)(4-MePyS)(CHCH-4-MePyS)] (3a) where one molecule of acetylene has inserted into the W–N bond and a second C2H2 is coordinated. This is similar to what has recently been found for [W(CO)3(PyS)2],38 while only partial insertion occurred when position 6 was blocked by a methyl group as with 6-MePyS.26 The electronic effects of substituents in positions 2, 4, or 6 in pyridine are known to be similar35 indicating that the methyl group in 6-MePyS prevents the insertion for steric reasons only. Although the pKa values of the pyridine heterocycles indicate that 4-MePy (6.0) with an additional methyl group is a stronger base than the parent Py (5.2),37 complexes bearing their respective thiolate ligand form show the same reactivity toward the insertion. Accordingly, we expected 1b containing the 3-ClPyS ligand to react to the inserted product [W(CO)(C2H2)(3-ClPyS)(CHCH-3-ClPyS)] (3b) upon exposure to C2H2. However, after full consumption of the starting material, we consistently observe a mixture of [W(CO)(C2H2)(3-ClPyS)2] (2b) and 3b in a 2:3 ratio. Nevertheless, after 24 h of stirring under acetylene atmosphere, 3b could be isolated after purification by filtration through silica gel and recrystallization from dichloromethane/heptane in 40% yield as a purple solid. Interestingly, we noticed that stirred solutions of 3b in dichloromethane gradually change the color from purple to brown. Spectroscopic characterization of this brown mixture (SI) revealed the partial formation of [W(CO)(C2H2)(3-ClPyS)2] (2b) due to the release of the inserted acetylene. Full conversion to 2b was possible by stirring a dichloromethane solution of 3b under reflux for 6 h. Thus, the most convenient procedure to prepare 2b was performed by isolating the initial reaction mixture of 2b and 3b, subsequent purification by filtration through silica gel, and stirring under reflux for 6 h, which allowed the isolation of 2b as a brown powder in 60% yield. The release of C2H2 was also observed with [W(CO)(C2H2)(PyS)(CHCH-PyS)] (3a)24 and [W(CO)(C2H2)(6-MePyS)(CHCH-6-MePyS)],26 but only partially and accompanied by the formation of polyacetylene. Thus, the use of a sterically demanding, electron-deficient ligand should prevent insertion reactions altogether. Indeed, the reaction of [WBr2(CO)3(MeCN)2] with 2.1 equiv of K(5-NO2-6-MePyS) for 45 min and subsequent flushing with acetylene for another 45 min gave [W(CO)(C2H2)(5-NO2-6-MePyS)2] (2c) after workup as a brown powder in 80% yield. In contrast to all other investigated pyridine-2-thiolate systems, even after stirring a solution of 2c in CH2Cl2 under acetylene atmosphere for 24 h, no inserted complex was detected. We ascribe this to the synergistic effect of the steric demand of the methyl group in the 6-position and the electron-withdrawing properties of the nitro-group. The prevention of insertion is relevant for the oxidation to the biological oxidation state +IV, as all our attempts to oxidize inserted products were futile.

For the synthesis of [W(CO)(C2H2)(4-MePyS)2] (2a), we had to apply another synthetic procedure because of the aforementioned favored insertion in complexes with 4-MePyS. Similar to the preparation of [W(CO)(C2H2)(PyS)2],24 a metal precursor composed of a mixture of [WBr2(CO)(C2H2)2(MeCN)] and [WBr2(CO)(C2H2)(MeCN)2] was reacted with Na(4-MePyS) in dichloromethane for 2 h. Complex 2a was obtained after purification using silica gel and recrystallization from dichloromethane/heptane as dark green crystals in a 19% yield.

Oxidation to Tungsten(IV) Complexes

Compounds 2ad can be oxidized to complexes of the type [WO(C2H2)(SN)2] (4ad) by a slight excess of pyridine-N-oxide (PyNO) as an oxygen source in dichloromethane (Scheme 1). The required reaction time for full conversion is highly dependent on the pyridine-2-thiolate ligand and ranges from 10 min in the case of the nitro-substituted 2c to several hours starting from 2a, 2b, and 2d. All oxido acetylene compounds can be isolated in high yields (4a 68%, 4b 87%, 4c 75%, and 4d 91%) as yellow powders. Furthermore, complex 4b can also be obtained directly from the reaction of PyNO with 3b due to the observed reversibility of the insertion in the latter. Compound 2c bearing 5-NO2-6-MePyS is, in comparison to the other W(II) systems, oxidized significantly faster. This can be explained by a decrease in π-back-donation of tungsten to CO weakening the tungsten carbonyl bond, thereby facilitating the release of CO and oxidation of the metal center. This is supported by IR and X-ray data upon comparison of complex 2c (ν (CO) 1919 cm–1, W–CO: 1.969 Å) with its analogue lacking the nitro group [W(CO)(C2H2)(6-MePyS)2] (ν (CO) 1891 cm–1, W–CO: 1.958 Å).26

Spectroscopic Data

Coordination of acetylene was confirmed by 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy. In the case of type 2 complexes, acetylenic protons resonate as two singlets in the region 12–14 ppm due to the asymmetry of coordination (Table 1). Complexes 2a and 2b are found as a mixture of two isomers in solution, while complex 2c appears in isomerically pure form. For type 3 complexes, 1H NMR spectra show the presence of side-on coordinated (η2-C2H2) and an inserted acetylene (η1-C2H2). Side-on coordinated acetylene resonates in the same region as those in type 2, while the η1-C2H2 resonates in the form of two doublets in the aromatic region. Both inserted complexes 3a and 3b are isomerically pure. Due to C2H2 release from 3b and its low solubility, it was not possible to record a meaningful 13C NMR spectrum.

Table 1. Spectroscopic Data for Tungsten Acetylene Complexes.

compound 1H NMR of η2-C2H2 [ppm]a 13C NMR of η2-C2H2 [ppm]a IR (CO) [cm–1] IR (W=O) [cm–1]
2a 13.62, 12.31 207.2, 206.4 1907  
2b 13.80, 12.49 209.4, 207.9 1896  
2c 14.10, 12.83 209.8, 207.4 1919  
3a 12.91, 11.99 198.4, 193.1 1907  
3b 12.96, 12.01 Not available 1903  
4a 10.95, 10.94 158.1, 154.7   945
4b 11.08, 11.00 157.1, 154.8   936
4c 11.44, 11.15 160.2, 158.2   937
4d 10.99 158.0, 155.0   937
a

In CD2Cl2; data of major isomer.

In the case of tungsten(IV) oxo species (type 4), acetylenic proton resonances are upfield-shifted compared to their W(II) analogues and flanked by 183W satellites. For complexes 4ac, the acetylenic protons appear in the form of two singlets. Differently, complex 4d shows only one singlet for both C2H2 protons, presumably due to the dynamic behavior of coordinated acetylene. All type 4 complexes, except 4c, show an additional set of signals related to the presence of a second isomer in solution. As expected, signals are downfield-shifted when 5-NO2-6-MePyS is bound to the tungsten center. Even though most of the complexes exhibit two isomers in solution, only one could be crystallized (vide infra). Upon dissolving single crystals, the same ratio of the two isomers is observed pointing toward an equilibrium in solution.

The reactivity and synthetic approaches for obtaining complexes 2, 3, and 4 vary significantly depending on the ligand, which is however hardly reflected when comparing NMR and IR data of the respective complexes. Thus, the acetylenic proton shifts in the tungsten(II) acetylene complexes 2ac are very similar. This can possibly be ascribed to the long distance from the ligand substituents to the acetylenic protons. It suggests that the reactivity differences are primarily influenced by steric effects.

Molecular Structures

The crystal structures of complexes 1ab, 2ac, 3ab, and 4ad were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Molecular views of types 2, 3, and 4 are given in Figures 24. Selected bond lengths of complexes 14 are presented in Table 2. Full crystallographic details such as structure refinement data as well as experimental details are provided within the SI. All compounds feature distorted octahedral environments around the W atom. The center of the η2 C≡C bond occupies the sixth position, which is always located cis to the carbonyl or oxo groups. A significant loss of triple bond character and linearity is observed in all η2-bound acetylene molecules, which shows that the actual bonding situation is between the η2-adduct and metallacyclopropene resonance structures.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Molecular structures (50% probability thermal ellipsoids) of complexes 2ac (left to right) showing the atomic numbering scheme. Non-acetylenic H atoms are omitted for clarity reasons.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Molecular structures (50% probability thermal ellipsoids) of complexes 4ad (from left to right) showing the atomic numbering scheme. Non-acetylenic H atoms are omitted for clarity reasons.

Table 2. Selected Bond Lengths for Tungsten Acetylene Complexes.

Complex C≡Ca W–C2H2 WCH=CH W–CHCHN C≡Oa W–CO W=O ref
2a 1.302(12) 2.090(13)     1.142(16) 1.884(16)    
2.078(7)
2b 1.286(6) 2.020(4)     1.148(5) 1.962(4)    
2.048(5)
2c 1.313(3) 2.023(2)     1.151(3) 1.969(2)    
2.044(2)
[W(CO)(C2H2)(PyS)2] 1.316(3) 2.022(2)     1.159(3) 1.973(2)   (24)
2.045(2)
[W(CO)(C2H2)(6-MePyS)2] 1.306(7) 2.022(5)     1.167(6) 1.958(5)   (26)
2.055(3)
3a 1.308(3) 2.031(2) 1.331(3) 2.104(2) 1.157(3) 1.987(2)    
2.0505(19)
3b 1.314(10) 2.048(5) 1.311(8) 2.101(6) 1.181(9) 1.963(8)    
2.071(5)
[W(CO)(C2H2)(CHCH-PyS)(PyS)] 1.3148(19) 2.0353(13) 1.3421(18) 2.0964(13) 1.161(15) 1.9781(12)   (24)
2.0582(13)
[W(CO)(C2H2)(CHCH-6-MePys)(6-MePyS)] 1.310(3) 2.047(2) 1.349(3) 2.103(2) 1.168(3) 1.974(2)   (26)
2.065(2)
[W(CO)(C2H2)(CHCH-PnS)(PnS)] 1.315(7) 2.036(4) 1.358(6) 2.079(4) 1.156(6) 1.993(5)   (24)
2.060(4)
4a 1.280(3) 2.095(2)         1.7204(17)  
2.093(2)
4b 1.274(5) 2.083(3)         1.701(3)  
2.094(4)
4c 1.258(5) 2.068(3)         1.710(2)  
2.084(3)
4d 1.260(4) 2.073(2)         1.712(2)  
2.087(3)
[WO(C2H2)(6-MePyS)2] 1.279(2) 2.0693(15)         1.7153(13) (26)
2.1027(15)
a

Bond lengths are given in Å. Bond lengths of the unbound gases: C2H2, CC: 1.186(4) Å;41 CO, 1.12822(7) Å.42

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Molecular structures (50% probability thermal ellipsoids) of complexes 3a (left) and 3b (right) showing the atomic numbering scheme. Non-acetylenic H atoms are omitted for clarity reasons.

Monoacetylene carbonyl complexes (2ac) show similar structural properties in terms of bond lengths and angles. Compounds 2a and 2b crystallized in S,S-trans configuration, while 2c crystallized as a S,S-cis isomer, as reported for similar compounds. The carbonyl ligand in 2ac is trans to the N atoms of the pyridine-2-thiolate ligand. Moreover, the CO shows the common parallel arrangement with coordinated C2H2.15 In complex 2a, the carbonyl ligand and the acetylene ligand are disordered over two orientations. The complex lies on a twofold rotation axis parallel to the c-axis. Moreover, in the case of 2c, the η2-acetylene ligand is trans to the rather long-distant atom S1 (W1–S1 2.5872(6) Å vs W1–S2 2.4024(6) Å). The planes of the nitro groups enclose angles of 28.1(3)° and 29.2(3)° with the pyridine rings they are bonded to.

In both 3a and 3b, the W atom is octahedrally surrounded with the two S atoms in cis positions (3a: S1–W1–S2 74.995(18)°, 3b: S1–W1–S2 74.62(7)°), and the η2-acetylene ligand as well as the η1-C2H2 group are trans to them. The carbonyl ligands are trans oriented to the N atom of the pyridine-2-thiolate ligand (3a: C3–W1–N21 164.99(8)°, 3b: C3–W1–N21 163.1(3)°) and eclipsed to the acetylene ligand.

Interestingly, the C–C bond lengths of the inserted C2H2 molecule correlate with the reactivity toward acetylene release. Indeed, complex [W(CO)(C2H2)(CHCH-PnS)(PnS)], (PnS = 6-(tert-butyl)pyridazine-3-thiolate), has the longest inserted C–C bond, being the only one not prone to acetylene release.24 On the contrary, for all the other complexes with shorter C–C bonds (Table 2), at least a partial release of inserted acetylene was observed.

Complexes 4a, 4b, and 4d crystallized as S,S-trans isomers. The W–N distances trans to the oxo ligand are significantly longer (4a: W1–N11 2.3464(18) Å, 4b: 2.306(4) Å, 4d: 2.314(2) Å) than W–N distances trans to the η2-acetylene ligand (4a: W1–N21 2.219(2) Å, 4b: 2.242(4) Å, 4d: 2.221(2)Å). Moreover, the η2-C2H2 shows the typical orthogonal arrangement with the oxo ligand.16

Similar to [WO(C2H2)(6-MePyS)2], complex 4c crystallizes as an S,S-cis isomer. The thiolate group opposite the oxo ligand has a distinctly larger distance to W (W1–S2 2.6283(8) Å) than the other one (W1–S1 2.4153(8) Å). The W–N distance of the ligand opposite the η2-acetylene (W1–N11 2.279(3) Å) is also distinctly longer than the other one (W1–N21 2.225(2) Å). The η2-acetylene ligand (C1–C2 1.258(5) Å, W1–C2 1.978(3) Å) is almost normal to the W=O bond (C1–C2–W1–O1 88.2(2)°, C2–C1–W1–O1–100.5(2)°) and eclipsed to W1–N21 (C1–C2–W1–N21–177.9(2)°, C2–C1–W1–N21 2.3(2)°).

Steric hindrance in position 6 leads exclusively to the formation of the S,S-cis isomer. The configuration in which both sulfur atoms are trans to each other is more likely to occur within complexes without steric interference in position 6, except for [W(CO)(C2H2)(PyS)2] which crystallized as S,S-cis isomer. This trend is also reflected in the tricarbonyl complexes as presented in Table 3 (for crystallographic details, see SI Figures S1–2, Tables S1,S6–7). Moreover, all inserted complexes exhibit exclusively the S,S-cis configuration.

Table 3. Orientation of the Ligands within W Complexes Based on Molecular Structures.

  PyS 6-MePyS 4-MePyS 3-ClPyS 5-NO2-6-MePyS
[W(CO)3(SN)2] S,S-trans S,S-cis S,S-trans S,S-trans  
[W(CO)(C2H2)(SN)2] S,S-cis S,S-cis S,S-trans S,S-trans S,S-cis
[W(CO)(C2H2)(CHCH-SN)(SN)] S,S-cis S,S-cis S,S-cis S,S-cis  
[WO(C2H2)(SN)2] S,S-trans S,S-cis S,S-trans S,S-trans S,S-cis

The geometry of type 2 complexes is likely influencing the reactivity toward acetylene, especially since the second molecule of C2H2 seems to coordinate to the W(II) center prior to insertion.24 The latter occurs more easily when the metal center is not shielded by methyl groups in position 6. Moreover, carbonyl acetylene complexes bearing 6-MePyS26 and 5-NO2-6-MePyS (2c) ligands exist as a single isomer in solution (S,S-cis), and this orientation may be too rigid to undergo the coplanar rearrangement necessary for the migratory insertion. In contrast, other pyridine-2-thiolate based complexes with no substituent at position 6 show the presence of two isomers in solution. This suggests that for the insertion, the S,S-trans configuration is required. Flexible isomerization between the two configurations might facilitate the reactivity toward the coordination of the second molecule of acetylene.

Conclusion

Here, we report the influence of different substitutional patterns on the reactivity of W(II) complexes toward the acetylene insertion and oxidation process. Comparison of the electronically similar 4-MePyS with 6-MePyS systems allows the conclusion that steric factors govern the reactivity toward insertion. The presence of the methyl group in the 6-MePyS complex prevents insertion of acetylene, while with 4-MePyS, the inserted compound [W(CO)(C2H2)(CHCH-4-MePyS)(4-MePyS)] was obtained. No insertion is observed by combining the steric effect of the methyl group and the electronic effect of the nitro group in 5-NO2-6-MePyS. The predominance of steric effects is also demonstrated by the 3-ClPyS system where the presence of an electron-withdrawing group in position 3 does not prevent insertion. However, the inserted complex is significantly more sensitive toward releasing C2H2 in solution compared to 3a, which exhibits a methyl group in position 4. Moreover, the tendency to release inserted acetylene from type 3 complexes decreases with the C–C bond lengths of the η1-C2H2 moiety. Tungsten(IV) oxo acetylene complexes [WO(C2H2)(SN)2] can be synthesized from W(II) acetylene species with pyridine-N-oxide. When using 5-NO2-6-MePyS, π-back-donation from tungsten to the carbonyl in type 2 is reduced, thereby weakening the tungsten carbonyl bond and thus leading to a shorter oxidation reaction time. Complexes with pyridine-2-thiolate ligands substituted in position 6 are prone to adopt the S,S-cis orientation, while the sterically less demanding systems tend to crystallize in the S,S-trans configuration. We assume that the flexibility of the ligand coordination in W(II) complexes with 4-MePyS and 3-ClPyS ligands allows further reactivity with a second molecule of acetylene required for insertion. To our surprise, regardless of the substitutional patterns of pyridine-2-thiolate ligands, all the complexes containing η2-C2H2 have similar structural properties within their groups.

Acknowledgments

Financial support by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, grant number P31583) and NAWI Graz is gratefully acknowledged.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00472.

  • Full X-ray data, NMR spectra, and experimental procedures (PDF)

Accession Codes

CCDC 2103131–2103141 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: +44 1223 336033.

Author Present Address

§ Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, 45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr

Author Present Address

Infineon Technologies Austria AG, 9500 Villach

Author Contributions

R.B. and M.Z.Ć. contributed equally. The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

om1c00472_si_001.pdf (3.6MB, pdf)

References

  1. Seelmann C. S.; Willistein M.; Heider J.; Boll M. Tungstoenzymes: Occurrence, Catalytic Diversity and Cofactor Synthesis. Inorganics 2020, 8, 44. 10.3390/inorganics8080044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rosner B. M.; Schink B. Purification and characterization of acetylene hydratase of Pelobacter acetylenicus, a tungsten iron-sulfur protein. J. Bacteriol. 1995, 177, 5767–5772. 10.1128/jb.177.20.5767-5772.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Meckenstock R. U.; Krieger R.; Ensign S.; Kroneck P. M.; Schink B. Acetylene hydratase of Pelobacter acetylenicus. Molecular and spectroscopic properties of the tungsten iron-sulfur enzyme. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 264, 176–182. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00600.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Seiffert G. B.; Ullmann G. M.; Messerschmidt A.; Schink B.; Kroneck P. M. H.; Einsle O. Structure of the non-redox-active tungsten/4Fe:4S enzyme acetylene hydratase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104, 3073–3077. 10.1073/pnas.0610407104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Tenbrink F.; Schink B.; Kroneck P. M. H. Exploring the active site of the tungsten, iron-sulfur enzyme acetylene hydratase. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 1229–1236. 10.1128/JB.01057-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burgess B. K.; Lowe D. J. Mechanism of Molybdenum Nitrogenase. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2983–3012. 10.1021/cr950055x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Antony S.; Bayse C. A. Theoretical Studies of Models of the Active Site of the Tungstoenzyme Acetylene Hydratase. Organometallics 2009, 28, 4938–4944. 10.1021/om900230x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Vincent M. A.; Hillier I. H.; Periyasamy G.; Burton N. A. A DFT study of the possible role of vinylidene and carbene intermediates in the mechanism of the enzyme acetylene hydratase. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 3816–3822. 10.1039/b924800e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Liao R.-Z.; Yu J.-G.; Himo F. Mechanism of tungsten-dependent acetylene hydratase from quantum chemical calculations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 22523–22527. 10.1073/pnas.1014060108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Liao R.-Z.; Thiel W. Comparison of QM-Only and QM/MM Models for the Mechanism of Tungsten-Dependent Acetylene Hydratase. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 3793–3803. 10.1021/ct3000684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liao R.-Z.; Thiel W. Convergence in the QM-only and QM/MM modeling of enzymatic reactions: A case study for acetylene hydratase. J. Comput. Chem. 2013, 34, 2389–2397. 10.1002/jcc.23403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liao R.-Z.; Himo F. Theoretical Study of the Chemoselectivity of Tungsten-Dependent Acetylene Hydratase. ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 937–944. 10.1021/cs200242m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maia L. B.; Moura I.; Moura J. J. G.. Molybdenum and Tungsten-Containing Enzymes: An Overview. In Molybdenum and Tungsten Enzymes, Hille R.; Schulzke C.; Kirk M. L., Eds.; Metallobiology; Royal Society of Chemistry, 2016; pp 1–80. [Google Scholar]
  14. Dobbek H.; Huber R. The molybdenum and tungsten cofactors: a crystallographic view. Metal Ions in Biological Systems 2002, 39, 227–263. 10.1201/9780203909331.ch7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ricard L.; Weiss R.; Newton W. E.; Chen G. J. J.; McDonald J. W. Binding and activation of enzymic substrates by metal complexes. 4. Structural evidence for acetylene as a four-electron donor in carbonylacetylenebis(diethyldithiocarbamate)tungsten. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 1318–1320. 10.1021/ja00472a062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Templeton J. L.; Ward B. C.; Chen G. J. J.; McDonald J. W.; Newton W. E. Oxotungsten(IV)-acetylene complexes: synthesis via intermetal oxygen atom transfer and nuclear magnetic resonance studies. Inorg. Chem. 1981, 20, 1248–1253. 10.1021/ic50218a056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Umland P.; Vahrenkamp H. Siebenfach koordinierte Carbonylkomplexe des Molybdäns und Wolframs, III. Isonitril- und Acetylenkomplexe des Wolframs. Chem. Ber. 1982, 115, 3580–3586. 10.1002/cber.19821151110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nielson A. J.; Ware D. C. Organoimido complexes of tungsten(IV) containing π-acceptor ligands. Polyhedron 1990, 9, 603–610. 10.1016/S0277-5387(00)86240-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Radius U.; Sundermeyer J.; Pritzkow H. Diimidokomplexe [M(NR)2(PMe3)2(L)] des vierwertigen Molybdäns und Wolframs: Struktur, Moleküldynamik und Aktivierung π-acider Liganden. Chem. Ber. 1994, 127, 1827–1835. 10.1002/cber.19941271003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Crane T. W.; White P. S.; Templeton J. L. Conversion of Tungsten(IV) Oxo–Alkyne Complexes to Oxo–Vinylidene Complexes. Organometallics 1999, 18, 1897–1903. 10.1021/om9809926. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Peschel L. M.; Belaj F.; Mösch-Zanetti N. C. Towards Structural-Functional Mimics of Acetylene Hydratase: Reversible Activation of Acetylene using a Biomimetic Tungsten Complex. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 13018–13021. 10.1002/anie.201505764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Helmdach K.; Ludwig S.; Villinger A.; Hollmann D.; Kösters J.; Seidel W. W. Synthesis and activation potential of an open shell diphosphine. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 5894–5897. 10.1039/C7CC02114C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Peschel L. M.; Vidovič C.; Belaj F.; Neshchadin D.; Mösch-Zanetti N. C. Activation and Photoinduced Release of Alkynes on a Biomimetic Tungsten Center: The Photochemical Behavior of the W-S-Phoz System. Chem. - Eur. J. 2019, 25, 3893–3902. 10.1002/chem.201805665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vidovič C.; Peschel L. M.; Buchsteiner M.; Belaj F.; Mösch-Zanetti N. C. Structural Mimics of Acetylene Hydratase: Tungsten Complexes Capable of Intramolecular Nucleophilic Attack on Acetylene. Chem. - Eur. J. 2019, 25, 14267–14272. 10.1002/chem.201903264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vidovič C.; Belaj F.; Mösch-Zanetti N. C. Soft Scorpionate Hydridotris(2-mercapto-1-methylimidazolyl) borate) Tungsten-Oxido and -Sulfido Complexes as Acetylene Hydratase Models. Chem. - Eur. J. 2020, 26, 12431–12444. 10.1002/chem.202001127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ehweiner M. A.; Peschel L. M.; Stix N.; Ćorović M. Z.; Belaj F.; Mösch-Zanetti N. C. Bioinspired Nucleophilic Attack on a Tungsten-Bound Acetylene: Formation of Cationic Carbyne and Alkenyl Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 8414–8418. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Davidson J. L.; Green M.; Nyathi J. Z.; Stone F. G. A.; Welch A. J. Reactions of sixteen-electron bis(alkyne)-molybdenum and -tungsten complexes with phosphines and isocyanides. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1977, 2246–2255. 10.1039/DT9770002246. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Davidson J. L.; Murray I. E. P.; Preston P. N.; Russo M. V.; Manojlović-Muir L.; Muir K. W. Formation of novel η2 -vinyl complexes by nucleophilic attack at co-ordinated hexafluorobut-2-yne. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1981, 1059–1061. 10.1039/C39810001059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Davidson J. L.; Vasapollo G.; Manojlović-Muir L.; Muir K. W. Stabilisation of vinylic intermediate in the addition, cylisation, and oligomerisation reactions of alkynes by co-ordination to molybdenum and tungsten. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1982, 0, 1025–1027. 10.1039/C39820001025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Davidson J. L.; Murray I. E. P.; Preston P. N.; Russo M. V. Co-ordinatively unsaturated alkyne complexes of molybdenum and tungsten. heterocyclic thiolates leading to η2-vinyl complexes. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1983, 1783–1787. 10.1039/DT9830001783. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Davidson J. L.; Wilson W. F.; Manojlović-Muir L.; Muir K. W. Isomerism and fluxional behaviour in η2-vinyl complexes resulting in inversion of configuration at an asymmetric carbon atom. J. Organomet. Chem. 1983, 254, C6–C10. 10.1016/0022-328X(83)85127-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Carlton L.; Davidson J. L.; Miller J. C.; Muir K. W. Reversible migration of a co-ordinated mercapto ligand on to a metal-bound alkyne to give η2-vinyl complexes. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 11–13. 10.1039/C39840000011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Abu Bakar W. W.; Carlton L.; Davidson J. L.; Manojlović-Muir L.; Muir K. W. Metal-promoted insertion and cyclisation reactions of alkynes. J. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 352, C54–C58. 10.1016/0022-328X(88)83133-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Davidson J. L.; Wilson W. F. Cyclo-oligomerisation reactions of bis(alkyne) and η2-vinyl complexes of molybdenum and tungsten with t-butyl isocyanide leading to iminocyclopentadiene derivatives. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1988, 27–34. 10.1039/DT9880000027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hansch C.; Leo A.; Taft R. W. A survey of Hammett substituent constants and resonance and field parameters. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 165–195. 10.1021/cr00002a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. For comparison, see the influence of the substitution on the pKa in the parent pyridine heterocycle: pKa(Py) = 5.2, pKa (4-MePy) = pKa(6-MePy) = 6.0.
  37. Pearson R. G.; Williams F. V. Rates of Ionization of Pseudo Acids. 1 V. Steric Effects in the Base-catalyzed Ionization of Nitroethane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 3073–3075. 10.1021/ja01109a008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ehweiner M. A.; Wiedemaier F.; Belaj F.; Mösch-Zanetti N. C. Oxygen Atom Transfer Reactivity of Molybdenum(VI) Complexes Employing Pyrimidine- and Pyridine-2-thiolate Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 59, 14577–14593. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Templeton J. L.; Ward B. C. Seven-coordinate tricarbonylbis(N,N-dialkyldithiocarbamato)tungsten(II) complexes. Molecular structure and dynamic properties. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 1753–1759. 10.1021/ic50208a066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Garner M.; Lehmann M.-A.; Reglinski J.; Spicer M. D. Soft (S 3 -Donor) Scorpionate Complexes of Molybdenum and Tungsten Carbonyls. Organometallics 2001, 20, 5233–5236. 10.1021/om010559n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. McMullan R. K.; Kvick Å.; Popelier P. Structures of cubic and orthorhombic phases of acetylene by single-crystal neutron diffraction. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 1992, 48, 726–731. 10.1107/S0108768192004774. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gilliam O. R.; Johnson C. M.; Gordy W. Microwave Spectroscopy in the Region from Two to Three Millimeters. Phys. Rev. 1950, 78, 140–144. 10.1103/PhysRev.78.140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

om1c00472_si_001.pdf (3.6MB, pdf)

Articles from Organometallics are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES