Skip to main content
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials logoLink to Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
. 2021 Nov 10;20:77. doi: 10.1186/s12941-021-00481-4

Differences of virulence factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility according to phylogenetic group in uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from Korean patients

Miri Hyun 1,2, Ji Yeon Lee 1,2, Hyun ah Kim 1,2,
PMCID: PMC8579644  PMID: 34758824

Abstract

Background

Escherichia coli is among the most common uropathogens. Increased antibiotic resistance in Gram negative bacilli is global concern. Alternative therapeutic options including vaccines against uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) have been developed. In this study, we compared the genotypic characteristics and antimicrobial susceptibility of UPEC according to phylogenetic groups.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of pyelonephritis patients with UPEC between February 2015 and June 2018. The study was conducted at a medical center in Korea. We compared the clinical and genotypic characteristics of UPEC according to phylogenetic groups. The phylogenetic groups and 29 virulence factors were identified using multiplex polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Phylogenetic group analysis revealed that most uropathogenic E. coli belonged to groups B2 and D: B2 (276, 77.7%), D (62, 17.5%), B1 (12, 3.4%), and A (5, 1.4%). Among the virulence factors, fyuA, fimH, traT, iutA, papG allele II, and papC were the most frequently observed. Phylogenetic group B2 was more closely related to virulence factors, including fimH, sfa/focED, focG, hlyA, cnf1, fyuA, and PAI, than group D. Groups B2 and D showed similar clinical presentations and complications. Group B2 had mostly healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance. Group D mostly had community-acquired infections. The K1 serotype was prevalent in group B2, and K5 was the most prevalent in group D.

Conclusions

Phylogenetic group B2 had more proportions and types of virulence factors than group D. Group B2 showed a high presentation of virulence factors related to adhesions and toxins. An increased presentation of antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infections was also noted. Considering the genetic characteristics of UPEC, alternative therapeutic options targeting frequent virulence factors might be considered in addition to antibiotics.

Keywords: Urinary tract infection, Escherichia coli, Phylogenetic group, Virulence factor, Antimicrobial susceptibility

Background

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections worldwide [1]. Among the uropathogens, uropathogenic Escherichia coli is the most predominant, causing up to 95% of community-acquired UTIs and 50% of healthcare-associated UTIs [24]. The clinical spectrum of UTI ranges from asymptomatic bacteriuria to cystitis, pyelonephritis, and prostatitis, and septic shock [5]. Clinical manifestations of UTI may differ depending on the underlying disease, preceding factors, and infecting bacteria [6, 7]. These manifestations can be influenced by bacterial pathogenicity [8]. In-hospital mortality is more dependent on uropathogens [4].

Increasing number of cases of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli, and decreased efficacy of broad-spectrum antibiotics are global concerns [9, 10]. Ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam, new alternative antibiotics of gram-negative bacilli, have been approved for clinical use; however, antimicrobial resistance to such antibiotics was reported even before the use of such antibiotics [11, 12]. Efforts are being made globally to develop alternative treatments or preventive methods. In addition to antibiotics, immunomodulatory agents, probiotics, and bacteriophages have been proposed as alternative therapeutic options for UTIs [13, 14]. Also, vaccines for uropathogenic E. coli is being developed to prevent recurrent UTI [15].

Uropathogenic E. coli have many virulence factors or properties, including adhesins, toxins, iron acquisition, and immune evasion that enable them to invade, colonize, and survive in the urinary tract [16]. Bacterial adhesion to uroepithelium is a crucial step of development of UTI [17]. The uropathogenic E. coli vaccine conducted up to the phase I study was ExPEC4V, and four types of E. coli O antigen were targeted [18]. Vaccines under development are targeting the virulence factors widely distributed in uropathogenic E. coli [16, 1821]. Most vaccines for uropathogenic E. coli primarily target adhesion molecules, iutA and fyuA [19, 22]. E. coli can be categorized into four major groups, A, B1, B2, and D [23]. Among uropathogenic E. coli, phylogenetic group B2 is the most abundant, and the distributions vary from 33 to 80%. Phylogenetic group D was reported to account for about 10–30% [2428]. The distribution of virulence factors may differ depending on the phylogenetic groups [20, 24]. Therefore, the analysis of virulence factors according to phylogenetic group B2 and D, which account for majority of uropathogenic E. coli cases, is important as basic data.

In this study, we compared virulence factors and antimicrobial susceptibility for the phylogenetic groups B2 and D and determined whether differences exist in clinical manifestations between the two groups. Additionally, the clinical characteristics and predisposing factors for the two groups were examined.

Methods

Study subjects

Patients who visited Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center with uropathogenic E. coli UTI from February 2015 to June 2018 were categorized into phylogenetic group A, B1, B2, or D. Phylogenetic group B2 or D, which account for a large proportion of uropathogenic E. coli, were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups according to phylogenetic group B2 and D. UTI was defined as a quantitative culture of ≥ 105 CFU/mL for E. coli isolated from midstream urine or that collected using a catheter, and the presence of urinary symptoms such as urgency, high frequency of urination, and dysuria. Diagnostic criteria for upper UTI included fever, flank pain, urinary symptoms, and/or tenderness of the costovertebral angle. Patients aged < 18 years or with polymicrobial infections were excluded, along with patients transferred to other hospitals during their treatment period. If the causative bacterium of a patient with UTI was E. coli, it was defined as uropathogenic E. coli. E. coli isolates from the blood, urine, or pus were collected, and only one isolate per patient was examined. The categories of infection were further divided into community-acquired, healthcare-associated, and nosocomial infections. Community-acquired infections were defined as those in which symptoms occurred within 48 h after visiting the hospital. However, patients with community-acquired infections and healthcare-associated risk factors were categorized under healthcare-associated infections. Healthcare-associated risk factors included hospitalization within 90 days, hemodialysis, intravenous medication in outpatient clinics, or residency in long-term care facilities. Nosocomial infections were defined as those in which symptoms occurred 48 h after hospital admission. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center (File No. 2020-02-003). The requirement for written informed consent was waived by the committee because of the retrospective nature of the study and the use of identifiable specimens. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively.

Study design

Data collection

Medical records, including underlying diseases, predisposing factors, antibiotics used within last 3 months, previous hospitalization, antimicrobial susceptibility, clinical features, current antibiotics being administered, and treatment outcomes, were retrospectively analyzed. Obstructive UTI was defined as UTI due to urinary tract obstruction such as one of the following: benign prostate hyperplasia, uterine prolapse, or malignancy. Urinary tract stones were not regarded as obstructive UTI and were classified as a predisposing factor. Severe UTI was defined as UTI combined with multiorgan failure or hypotension and complicated UTI as UTI with predisposing factors for persistent and relapsing infections, such as urinary tract stones, foreign bodies (for example, indwelling urinary catheters or other drainage devices), or obstructions. The short-term treatment outcome was determined after 72 h of empirical antibiotic treatment based on persistent fever and acute kidney injury. Persistent fever was defined as fever persisting over 72 h. Acute kidney injury was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level by > 0.3 mg/dL within 48 h, increase in serum creatinine level to > 1.5 times baseline within 7 days or increase in urine volume < 0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 h. The long-term outcome was determined by infection-related 30-day mortality and relapsed UTI within 3 months. Infection-related 30-day mortality was defined as death due to uropathogenic E. coli UTI or complications of infection within 30 days. McCabe-Jackson score was used as the criteria to predict the survival of patients with gram-negative bacteremia based on the level of the underlying diseases, which were classified as rapidly fatal disease, ultimately fatal disease, and nonfatal underlying disease [29].

Phylogenetic groups

Phylogenetic groups of the E. coli isolates were determined using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method developed by Doumith et al. [1]. E. coli were categorized into one of the four main phylogenetic groups—A, B1, B2, and D—using four phylogenetic group markers—gadA, chuA, yjaA, and TSPE4.C2. The groups were determined according to the different combinations of the four amplicons. Crude deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was prepared by lysis of colonies in 500 μL of sterile distilled water at 100 °C for 15 min, followed by centrifugation. The lysis supernatant was used for the polymerase chain reaction. The polymerase chain reaction conditions were as follows: an initial activation at 94 °C for 4 min; then, 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 65 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s; and finally, extension at 72 °C for 5 min [23]. The primers used in this study are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Primers used for phylogenetic groups in this study

Marker Primer direction Primer sequence (5′-3′) Product length (bp)
gadA

Forward

Reverse

GATGAAATGGCGTTGGCGCAAG

GGCGGAAGTCCCAGACGATATCC

373
ChuA

Forward

Reverse

ATGATCATCGCGGCGTGCTG

AAACGCGCTCGCGCCTAAT

281
yjaA

Forward

Reverse

TGTTCGCGATCTTGAAAGCAAACGT

ACCTGTGACAAACCGCCCTCA

216
TSPE4.C2

Forward

Reverse

GCGGGTGAGACAGAAACGCG

TTGTCGTGAGTTGCGAACCCG

152

Virulence genes

Virulence genes were detected using a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay developed by Johnson and Stell [2]. This involved five primer pools, with 29 primers listed in order of decreasing amplicon size (bp) within each pool as follows: pool 1: PAI, papA, fimH, kpsMT III, papEF, and ibeA; pool 2: fyuA, bmaE, sfa/focDE, iutA, papG allele III, and K1; pool 3: hlyA, rfc, nfaE, papG allele I, kpsMT II, and papC; pool 4: gafD, cvaC, cdtB, focG, traT, and papG allele II; and pool 5: papG allele I, papG alleles II and III, afa/draBC, cnf1, sfas, and K5. The reaction was conducted with an initial activation at 95 °C for 12 min; followed by 25 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 30 s), annealing (63 °C, 30 s), and extension (68 °C, 3 min); and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplicons were electrophoresed in 2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and destained with distilled water [30]. The primers used in this study are listed in Table 2.

Table 2.

Primers used for virulence factors used in this study

Marker Primer direction Primer sequence (5′-3′) Product length (bp)
papA

Forward

Reverse

ATGGCAGTGGTGTCTTTTGGTG

CGTCCCACCATACGTGCTCTTC

720
papC

Forward

Reverse

GTGGCAGTATGAGTAATGACCGTTA

ATATCCTTTCTGCAGGGATGCAATA

200
papEF

Forward

Reverse

GCAACAGCAACGCTGGTTGCATCAT

AGAGAGAGCCACTCTTATACGGACA

336
papG allele I

Forward

Reverse

TCGTGCTCAGGTCCGGAATTT

TGGCATCCCCCAACATTATCG

461
papG allele II

Forward

Reverse

GGGATGAGCGGGCCTTTGAT

CGGGCCCCCAAGTAACTCG

190
papG allele III

Forward

Reverse

GGCCTGCAATGGATTTACCTGG

CCACCAAATGACCATGCCAGAC

258
sfa/focDE

Forward

Reverse

CTCCGGAGAACTGGGTGCATFTTAC

CGGAGGAGTAATTACAAACCTGGCA

410
sfaS

Forward

Reverse

GTGGATACGACGATTACTGTG

CCGCCAGCATTCCCTGTATTC

240
focG

Forward

Reverse

CAGCACAGGCAGTGGATACGA

GAATGTCGCCTGCCCATTGCT

360
afa/draBC

Forward

Reverse

GGCAGAGGGCCGGCAACAGGC

CCCGTAACGCGCCAGCATCTC

559
bmaE

Forward

Reverse

ATGGCGCTAACTTGCCATGCTG

AGGGGGACATATAGCCCCCTTC

507
gafD

Forward

Reverse

TGTTGGACCGTCTCAGGGCTC

CTCCCGGAACTCGCTGTTACT

952
nfaE

Forward

Reverse

GCTTACTGATTCTGGGATGGA

CGGTGGCCGAGTCATATGCCA

559
fimH

Forward

Reverse

TGCAGAACGGATAAGCCGTGG

GCAGTCACCTGCCCTCCGGTA

508
hlyA

Forward

Reverse

AACAAGGATAAGCACTGTTCTGGCT

ACCATATAAGCGGTCATTCCCGTCA

1177
cnf1

Forward

Reverse

AAGATGGAGTTTCCTATGCAGGAG

CATTCAGAGTCCTGCCCTCATTATT

498
fyuA

Forward

Reverse

TGATTAACCCCGCGACGGGAA

CGCAGTAGGCACGATGTTGTA

880
iutA

Forward

Reverse

GGCTGGACATCATGGGAACTGG

CGTCGGGAACGGGTAGAATCG

300
kpsMT II

Forward

Reverse

GCGCATTTGCTGATACTGTTG

CATCCAGACGATAAGCATGAGCA

272
kpsMT III

Forward

Reverse

TCCTCTTGCTACTATTCCCCCT

AGGCGTATCCATCCCTCCTAAC

392
rfc

Forward

Reverse

ATCCATCAGGAGGGGACTGGA

AACCATACCAACCAATGCGAG

788
ibeA

Forward

Reverse

AGGCAGGTGTGCGCCGCGTAC

TGGTGCTCCGGCAAACCATGC

170
cvaC

Forward

Reverse

CACACACAAACGGGAGCTGTT

CTTCCCGCAGCATAGTTCCAT

680
traT

Forward

Reverse

GGTGTGGTGCGATGAGCACAG

CACGGTTCAGCCATCCCTGAG

290
PAI

Forward

Reverse

GGACATCCTGTTACATCGCGCA

TCGCCACCAATCACAGCCGAAC

930

PAI pathogenicity island

Antibiotic resistance and extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-disk diffusion test

Clinical specimens, such as blood, urine, and pus, were collected for microbial identification. E. coli was isolated using a Vitek system (BioMerieux, Lyon, France). Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were determined by interpreting the breakpoints recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline of 2016 [31]. ESBL production was detected using automated methodology, namely, the Phoenix GN Combo Panels 448541, which were used to inoculate and incubate bacteria according to the manufacturer’s recommendations [32]. Disk diffusion test was also performed to double check the ESBL-producing strains. Disk diffusion tests were performed in cases of resistance to cefotaxime or ceftazidime, twice for each specimen, and interpreted according to the 2020 CLSI guidelines, using Mueller-Hinton agar. Thirty microgram disks containing ceftazidime and ceftriaxone and 30/10 μg disks containing cefotaxime/clavulanate or ceftazidime/clavulanate were used (BD BBLTM Sensi-DiscTM Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Discs, BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Maryland, U.S.A) [33].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (version 21.0; SPSS Inc., IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Categories were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. For continuous variables, the normal distribution was calculated using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The Mann–Whitney U test and independent t-test were performed for data that followed non-normal and normal distributions, respectively. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results

Basic characteristics of the study group

Phylogenetic group analysis revealed that most uropathogenic E. coli belonged to groups B2 and D: B2 (276, 77.75%), D (62, 17.46%), B1 (12, 3.38%), and A (5, 1.41%). The clinical characteristics of phylogenetic group A, B1, B2, and D were briefly summarized in Table 3. Among the 4 phylogenetic groups, we compared group B2 and D in this study.

Table 3.

Baseline characteristics of uropathogenic Escherichia coli infection according to phylogenetic group

Phylogenetic group A
(n = 5)
Phylogenetic group B1 (n = 12) Phylogenetic group B2
(n = 276)
Phylogenetic group D
(n = 62)
Age, years 67 (59–84) 74 (69–78) 69.43 ± 14.59 69.16 ± 14.13
Male sex 2 (40.0%) 1 (8.3%) 57 (20.7%) 4 (6.5%)
Category of UTI
 Acute pyelonephritis 5 (100.0%) 12 (100.0%) 269 (97.5%) 61 (98.4%)
 Acute prostatitis 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 8 (2.9%) 2 (3.2%)
 Renal abscess 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 20 (7.2%) 8 (12.9%)
 Prostatic abscess 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 4 (1.4%) 0 (0.0%)
Category of infection
 Community-acquired 4 (80.0%) 8 (66.7%) 192 (69.6%) 52 (83.9%)
 Healthcare-associated 1 (20.0%) 4 (33.3%) 71 (25.7%) 7 (11.3%)
 Nosocomial 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 13 (4.7%) 3 (4.8%)

In group B2, 276 patients were included; 57 (20.7%) were men, and the mean age was 69.43 years. In group D, 62 patients were included; 4 (6.5%) were men, and the mean age was 69.16 years. The proportion of male patients was significantly higher in the group B2 than in other groups (P = 0.009). For the underlying diseases, diabetes mellitus (DM) was more frequently observed in group D (51.6%) than in group B2 (36.6%) (P = 0.029). No significant differences with respect to underlying diseases were observed between the two groups, except for DM. The McCabe-Jackson score indicated no significant differences between the two groups. Obstructive uropathy and previous use of urinary catheters were more frequently observed in group B2 than in other groups, but without significant difference. Complicated UTI was more frequently observed in group B2 than in other groups (P = 0.009). Bacteremic UTI and severe UTIs did not differ significantly between the two groups; besides, analysis of UTI categories revealed no significant difference in the proportions of renal abscess, acute prostatitis, and prostatic abscess. However, analysis of infection categories revealed that the prevalence of community-acquired and healthcare-associated infections were significantly higher in groups D and B2, respectively, than in other groups (Table 4).

Table 4.

Baseline characteristics and clinical manifestations of uropathogenic Escherichia coli infection according to phylogenetic group

Phylogenetic group B2
(n = 276)
Phylogenetic group D
(n = 62)
p value
Age, years 69.43 ± 14.59 69.16 ± 14.13 0.893
Male sex 57 (20.7%) 4 (6.5%) 0.009
Category of UTI
 Acute pyelonephritis 269 (97.5%) 61 (98.4%) 0.999*
 Acute prostatitis 8 (2.9%) 2 (3.2%) 0.999*
 Renal abscess 20 (7.2%) 8 (12.9%) 0.144
 Prostatic abscess 4 (1.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0.999*
Category of infection
 Community-acquired 192 (69.6%) 52 (83.9%) 0.023
 Healthcare-associated 71 (25.7%) 7 (11.3%) 0.015
 Nosocomial 13 (4.7%) 3 (4.8%) 0.999*
Underlying diseases
 Solid tumor 39 (14.1%) 9 (14.5%) 0.937
 Hematologic malignancy 0 0
 Chronic liver disease 43 (15.6%) 7 (11.3%) 0.390
 Liver cirrhosis 14 (5.1%) 0 (0.0%) 0.082*
 Cardiovascular disease 75 (27.2%) 16 (25.8%) 0.826
 Hypertension 143 (51.8%) 39 (62.9%) 0.113
 Neurologic disease 98 (35.5%) 19 (30.6%) 0.467
 Chronic renal disease 14 (5.1%) 4 (6.5%) 0.753*
 Diabetes mellitus 101 (36.6%) 32 (51.6%) 0.029
 Chronic lung disease 28 (10.1%) 7 (11.3%) 0.789
 Solid organ transplantation 2 (0.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0.999*
Predisposing factors
 Pregnancy 1 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0.999*
 Neurogenic bladder 24 (8.7%) 5 (8.1%) 0.873
 BPH or uterine prolapse 26 (9.4%) 2 (3.2%) 0.110
 Urogenic anomaly 4 (1.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0.999*
 Nephrectomy state (one kidney) 3 (1.1%) 1 (1.6%) 0.557*
 Neutropenia 0 0
 Previous genitourinary surgery or procedure within 72 h 0 0
 Recurrent UTI 32 (11.6%) 6 (9.7%) 0.666
 Presence of urologic devices 1 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0.999*
 Intermittent catheterization 2 (0.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0.999*
 Urinary catheter 23 (8.3%) 3 (4.8%) 0.439*
 Prior antibiotics within 3 months 64 (23.2%) 12 (19.4%) 0.514
Type of UTI
 Bacteremic UTI 167 (60.5%) 44 (71.0%) 0.124
 Complicated UTI 57 (20.7%) 4 (6.5%) 0.009
 Severe UTI 94 (34.1%) 21 (33.9%) 0.978

BPH benign prostate hyperplasia, UTI urinary tract infection

*Fisher’s extract test

Comparison of virulence factors between phylogenetic groups B2 and D

FimH and fyuA were the most common virulence factors in both groups. Adhesion molecules were identified in both groups, and their distribution was similar. FimH (99.6% vs. 90.3%, P < 0.001), sfa/focED (17.0% vs. 0.0%, P < 0.001), and focG (12.3% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.036) were more common in phylogenetic group B2 than in D. Phylogenetic group B2 was the most closely related to virulence factors associated with adhesion, toxins, iron metabolism, and PAI. Group B2 had higher levels of toxin-associated virulence: hlyA (phylogenetic group B2 = 33.3% vs. D = 6.5%, P < 0.001), cnf1 (39.9% vs. 0.0%, P < 0.001), and cvaC (8.7% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.011); and iron metabolism-associated virulence factors: fyuA (99.6% vs. 93.5%, P = 0.004); and PAI (88.8% vs. 19.4%, P < 0.001) than group D. With regard to protection molecules, no significant differences were observed between the two groups. The K1 serotype was prevalent in the phylogenetic group B2, whereas K5 was widespread in group D (Table 5).

Table 5.

Virulence factors of uropathogenic Escherichia coli classified by phylogenetic group

Phylogenetic group B2
(n = 276)
Phylogenetic group D
(n = 62)
p value
Adhesion molecule
 papA 186 (67.4%) 41 (66.1%) 0.848
 papEF 40 (14.5%) 7 (11.3%) 0.510
 papC 195 (70.7%) 43 (69.4%) 0.840
 papG 133 (48.2%) 28 (45.2%) 0.666
 papG allele I 1 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0.999*
 papG allele II 196 (71.0%) 46 (74.2%) 0.616
 papG allele III 7 (2.5%) 0 (0.0%) 0.357*
 fimH 275 (99.6%) 56 (90.3%)  < 0.001*
 afa/draBC 38 (13.8%) 12 (19.4%) 0.263
 sfaS 15 (5.4%) 5 (8.1%) 0.385*
 sfa/focED 47 (17.0%) 0 (0.0%)  < 0.001
 bmaE 1 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0.999*
 gafD 0 0
 nfaE 1 (0.4%) 2 (3.2%) 0.088*
 focG 34 (12.3%) 2 (3.2%) 0.036
Toxin
 hlyA 92 (33.3%) 4 (6.5%)  < 0.001
 cnf1 110 (39.9%) 0 (0.0%)  < 0.001
 cvaC 24 (8.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0.011*
 cdtB 0 0
Iron metabolism
 fyuA 275 (99.6%) 58 (93.5%) 0.004*
 iutA 203 (73.6%) 47 (75.8%) 0.715
Protection, Capsule
 kpsMT II 159 (57.6%) 39 (62.9%) 0.444
 kpsMT III 3 (1.1%) 2 (3.2%) 0.228*
 rfc 4 (1.4%) 1 (1.6%) 0.999*
 traT 214 (77.5%) 49 (79.0%) 0.798
Others
 PAI 245 (88.8%) 12 (19.4%)  < 0.001
 ibeA 18 (6.5%) 1 (1.6%) 0.218*
 K1 88 (31.9%) 3 (4.8%)  < 0.001
 K5 60 (21.7%) 21 (33.9%) 0.043

PAI pathogenicity island

*Fisher’s extract test

Comparison of antibiotic resistance, empirical antibiotics, and antibiotic adequacy

The rates of resistance to ciprofloxacin, cefotaxime, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were 50.5%, 45.1%, and 37.1% in group B2 and 22.6%, 29.0%, and 48.4% in group D (P < 0.001; P < 0.001; and P = 0.100, without significance difference). The proportions of ESBL-producing E. coli in Phoenix GN Combo Panels were 44.0% and 27.4% in groups B and D, respectively (P = 0.016): in the double-disk diffusion test, the proportions of ESBL-producing E. coli were 27.2% and 17.7% in groups B2 and D, respectively (P = 0.123) (Table 6). Among ESBL-producing E. coli, resistance rates to ciprofloxacin, piperacillin/tazobactam, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were 87.6%, 14.0%, and 56.2% in group B2 and 47.1%, 11.8%, and 58.8% in group D (P < 0.001; P = 0.999; and P = 0.838, without significance difference). For both groups, the most commonly used empirical antibiotic was ceftriaxone. Eighty-four (66.7%) and 48 cases (77.4%) in groups B2 and D, respectively, were evaluated to have used concordant initial antibiotics.

Table 6.

Antibiotic resistance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli classified by phylogenetic group

Phylogenetic group B2
(n = 276)
Phylogenetic group D
(n = 62)
p value
Resistance
 Amikacin 2 (0.8%) 0 (0.0%) 0.999*
 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 118 (42.9%) 9 (14.6%)  < 0.001
 Ampicillin 210 (76.4%) 47 (75.8%) 0.926
 Aztreonam 120 (43.6%) 17 (27.4%) 0.019
 Cefazolin 134 (48.7%) 18 (29.0%) 0.005
 Cefepime 120 (43.6%) 17 (27.4%) 0.019
 Cefotaxime 124 (45.1%) 18 (29.0%) 0.022
 Cefoxitin 25 (9.1%) 5 (8.1%) 0.804
 Ceftazidime 121 (44.0%) 16 (25.8%) 0.008
 Ciprofloxacin 139 (50.5%) 14 (22.6%)  < 0.001
 Ertapenem 0 0
 Gentamicin 94 (34.2%) 17 (27.4%) 0.315
 Imipenem 0 0
 Piperacillin/tazobactam 25 (9.1%) 3 (4.8%) 0.276
 Tigecycline 0 0
 Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 102 (37.1%) 30 (48.4%) 0.100
ESBL 121 (44.0%) 17 (27.4%) 0.016
ESBL double disk 75 (27.2%) 11 (17.7%) 0.123

ESBL extended-spectrum beta-lactamase

*Fisher’s extract test

Comparison of treatment outcomes

In early outcomes, 22.8% of cases had persistent fever and 17.0% experienced acute kidney injury during the hospital stay for group B2; for D, 22.6% and 17.7% of cases experienced persistent fever and acute kidney injury, respectively. Differences in persistent fever and acute kidney injury were insignificant between the two groups. Duration of hospital stay, 30-day mortalities, and infection-related 30-day mortality were 14.90 days, 1.8%, and 0.7% in group B2 and 12.71 days, 1.6%, and 0.0% in group D (without significant difference; P = 0.999 and P = 0.999). Six and one patient died in groups B2 and D, respectively. After they were diagnosed with UTI, the median period from diagnosis to death in group B2 was 9.5 days (interquartile range 7.0–25.75 days), and in group D, a patient died on day 3. Within 3 months, UTI events relapsed in 7.6% and 8.1% of B2 and D members, respectively, which were not significantly different (Table 7).

Table 7.

Outcomes of uropathogenic Escherichia coli infection classified by phylogenetic group

Phylogenetic group B2
(n = 276)
Phylogenetic group D
(n = 62)
p value
Persistent fever 63 (22.8%) 14 (22.6%) 0.967
Acute kidney injury 47 (17.0%) 11 (17.7%) 0.893
30-Day mortality 5 (1.8%) 1 (1.6%) 0.999*
Infection-related 30-day mortality 2 (0.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0.999*
Total duration of hospital stay, days 14.90 ± 10.70 12.71 ± 7.74 0.128
Time to death, days 9.50 (7.0–25.75) 3 (3–3) 0.313
Relapse within 3 months 21 (7.6%) 5 (8.1%) 0.999*

*Fisher’s extract test

Discussion

In this study, the phylogenetic groups B2 and D exhibited different characteristics. Phylogenetic group B2 had more virulence factors, especially higher presentation of adhesion-related (S fimbriae, F fimbriae), toxin-related (hemolysin A, cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1), and iron metabolism-related virulence factors (fyuA), than group D. Greater antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infection was also noted in group B2 than in group D. Phylogenetic group D was associated with community-acquired UTI and exhibited a lower association with virulence and predisposing factors than group B. No significant differences in clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes between the phylogenetic groups B2 and D occurred.

Pathogenic strains of E. coli have been classified by the identification of O, K, and H antigens [16]. A phylogenetic study revealed that E. coli can be separated into four major groups: A, B1, B2, and D [23] and are classified into three main groups according to genetic and clinical criteria: commensal, intestinal pathogenic, and extraintestinal pathogenic strains [16]. Among the extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli, some strains such as uropathogenic E. coli could survive in the gut and colonize the periurethral area, resulting in UTIs. The uropathogenic E. coli, which are known as the virulent strains, belong to the phylogenetic group B2 or D, and the less virulent strains mainly belong to A or B1 and are commensal strains [30].

The phylogenetic group of uropathogenic E. coli mainly comprised B2 group, but the distributions and proportions of phylogenetic groups and virulence factors vary based on the country where the study was conducted and study settings. In Italy, phylogenetic group B1 was the most prevalent in both community-acquired acute pyelonephritis and recurrent cystitis in females. The distribution and proportion of phylogenetic groups of acute pyelonephritis by uropathogenic E. coli were as follows: group B1, 68.7%; group A, 27.8%; and group D, 11.1%. Toxin-associated and siderophore-associated virulence factors were frequently observed in patients with recurrent cystitis [34]. In a study of community-acquired UTIs in Iran, phylogenetic group B2 was most frequently detected. The phylogenetic groups were as follows: group B2, 67.3%; group D, 21.4%; group A, 6.5%; and group B1, 4.8% [26]. In a study of community-acquired UTIs in Korea, phylogenetic group B2 was the most frequently detected, followed by groups D and A [24]. Previous reports were comparative studies of phylogenetic groups in community-acquired UTI. In Mexico, the phylogenetic groups of outpatient UTI were compared, and B2 (51.0%) was the most common, followed by A (13.4%), B1 (10.3%), and D (9.8%) in that order [27]. A Turkish study evaluated the distribution of phylogenetic groups in community-acquired UTI and nosocomial UTI, including cystitis and pyelonephritis. Phylogenetic group B2 was the most common in both community-acquired UTI and nosocomial UTI [25]. In a study of UTI in Mongolia, the proportion of phylogenetic groups was as follows: 33.8% B2, 28.4% D, 19.6% A, and 18.2% B1 [28]. In our study, we included patients with acute pyelonephritis who needed hospitalization, including cases of community-acquired, healthcare-associated, and nosocomial infections. The distributions of category of infection in this study may have influenced the phylogenetic groups. Analysis of phylogenetic groups including healthcare-associated UTI and nosocomial UTI of uropathogenic E. coli has been rare. Like the results of phylogenetic group analysis of community-acquired UTI in Korea, in this study phylogenetic group B2 was the most common in community-acquired acute pyelonephritis (APN), healthcare-associated APN and nosocomial APN [24]. In addition, recurrent UTI accounted for 11.6% in phylogenetic group B2 and 9.7% in group D, which should be considered when setting the vaccine target.

Uropathogenic E. coli have virulence factors, such as adhesion molecules, toxins, iron acquisition, immune evasion, and protectins [35]. In this study, virulence factors related to adhesion, iron metabolism, and protection were identified in both phylogenetic groups B2 and D. FimH, an adhesion molecule-associated virulence factor and fyuA, an iron metabolism-related virulence factor were the most and second most frequently detected virulence factors. The virulence factors that exhibited differences in distributions between the two groups were type I fimbriae; focG, sfa/focED in adhesion molecules; hlyA, cnf1 in toxins; fyuA in iron metabolism; and PAI. Adhesion molecules, such as type I fimbriae, play an important role in the attachment of E. coli to the mucosal epithelium, initiation of biofilm formation, and persistence in the bladder [17]. In a comparative study of UTIs with and without bacteremia in Sweden, adhesion molecules such as papG (P fimbriae) were more frequently observed in bacteremic UTI than in non-bacteremic UTI [36]. In a study of UTI at outpatient clinics, risk factor analysis of virulence factors affecting phylogenetic groups revealed that strains with papC and sfa genes were associated with the phylogenetic group B2 [26]. In addition, biofilm formation in E. coli was observed in strains harboring adhesion-associated virulence genes [37]. Toxin-related virulence factors are important for mediating bacterial invasion and for the dissemination and persistence of bacteria in the bladder [3840]. HlyA is needed for initial bacterial invasion, and cnf1 is needed for bacteria dissemination and persistence [16, 3941]. In a UTI-infected mouse model, hlyA accelerated bacteremia to fulminant sepsis [41]. HlyA-expressing uropathogenic E. coli activated caspase-independent necroptosis, but not caspase-mediated apoptotic cell death, and the products released from damaged cells by necroptosis induced proinflammatory response in macrophages [39]. In cnf1- and hlyA-expressing uropathogenic E. coli, higher urinary levels of proinflammatory cytokines were detected than in pathogens not expressing such virulence factors [40]. Iron uptake systems and siderophores facilitate iron scavenging in the environment [16]. In a study of E. coli bacteremia in Spain, strains expressing fyuA were associated with increased mortality during hospital stay [42]. FyuA causes invasion of bacteria into the bloodstream from the urinary tract and is associated with highly pathogenic strains [19, 42]. Various vaccines are being developed according to the mechanisms of virulence factors, mainly targeting adhesion molecules and iron metabolism [19, 22]. Vaccines related to toxins have not yet achieved significant results [13].

The phylogenetic group B2 has been associated with high antimicrobial resistance rates [26, 43]; this may have been influenced by a combination of several factors [44]. Several studies have reported that biofilm formation is associated with a high antibiotic resistance rate [34, 45]. Multiple virulence factors, such as α-hemolysin, lipopolysaccharides, proteases, adhesins, aerobactin, and fimbriae significantly affect biofilm formation [16]. The phylogenetic group B2 was associated with adhesion molecules and biofilm formation to a greater degree than other phylogenetic groups [45]. Drug resistance in uropathogenic E. coli strains is more likely caused by biofilm formation, and the biofilms have potential roles in recurrent infections and antibiotic resistance [34, 45, 46]. Several studies have reported virulence factors associated with the antimicrobial resistance of uropathogenic E. coli [25, 26, 34, 47]. PAI is also associated with antimicrobial resistance [26]. In a study of symptomatic UTIs in outpatients in Iran, hlyA, malX, and hlyA were revealed as risk factors among virulence factors affecting antimicrobial resistance to ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone [34]. Another study of UTIs including cystitis and pyelonephritis in Turkey showed that afa/draC and iha were the virulence factors associated with antimicrobial resistance [25]. In phylogenetic group D, among underlying diseases, diabetes mellitus was more common than in phylogenetic group B, and the frequency of bacteremia was also higher. Dysregulated immune pathways in diabetes mellitus contribute to the impairment of host responses in sepsis. Diabetic patients were more likely to develop acute kidney injury [48]. Although the strains of phylogenetic group B were more virulent than the strains of phylogenetic group D, there was no difference in clinical outcomes between the two groups, possibly due to differences in the frequency of underlying diseases, especially diabetes mellitus. Further research will be needed to determine whether there are other factors besides the underlying disease that are not significantly different from the clinical outcomes of phylogenetic groups B2 and D.

There are several limitations to this study. First, this study was retrospective; therefore, we had to rely on the medical records, and it was difficult to evaluate urinary function and identify the subjective urinary symptoms in all patients. Second, we acknowledge that the patients included in this study were at a tertiary hospital, and their condition might have been more severe than that of patients in a primary medical center. Despite these limitations, we found differences in the virulence factors, antimicrobial susceptibility, and clinical presentations of uropathogenic E. coli according to the phylogenetic group.

Conclusion

In conclusion, in cases of pyelonephritis with uropathogenic E. coli, we observed differences in the virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance rates between phylogenetic groups B2 and D. Further studies will be needed to elucidate the virulence factors of uropathogenic E. coli according to phylogenetic group and host interaction. As differences in genetic and phenotypic characteristics occur based on strains, various therapeutic options targeting virulence factors may be considered along with antibiotics.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Eun-Sil Park for data entry and completion.

Abbreviations

UPEC

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli

UTI

Urinary tract infection

PCR

Polymerase chain reaction

DNA

Deoxyribonucleic acid

ESBL

Extended spectrum beta-lactamase

CLSI

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

DM

Diabetes mellitus

APN

Acute pyelonephritis

min

Minute

Authors' contributions

Conceptualization and data curation: HMR. Laboratory experiment and methodology: HMR, KHA. Formal analysis: HMR, LJY. Writing—review and editing: HMR, LJY, KHA. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by a research grant from Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center in 2018.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset of the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center (File No. 2020-02-003). The requirement for written informed consent was waived by the committee because of the retrospective nature of the study and the use of identifiable specimens.

Consent for publication

No applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Miri Hyun, Email: eternity7919@dsmc.or.kr.

Ji Yeon Lee, Email: jirong84@dsmc.or.kr.

Hyun ah Kim, Email: hyunah1118@dsmc.or.kr.

References

  • 1.Flores-Mireles AL, Walker JN, Caparon M, Hultgren SJ. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:269–284. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kashef N, Djavid GE, Shahbazi S. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of community-acquired uropathogens in Tehran. Iran J Infect Dev Ctries. 2010;4:202–206. doi: 10.3855/jidc.540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kahlmeter G, Poulsen HO. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli from community-acquired urinary tract infections in Europe: the ECO.SENS study revisited. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;39:45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Simmering JE, Tang F, Cavanaugh JE, Polgreen LA, Polgreen PM. The increase in hospitalizations for urinary tract infections and the associated costs in the United States, 1998–2011. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4:281. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Foxman B. Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. Dis Mon. 2003;49:53–70. doi: 10.1067/mda.2003.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tan CW, Chlebicki MP. Urinary tract infections in adults. Singap Med J. 2016;57:485–490. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Storme O, Tiran Saucedo J, Garcia-Mora A, Dehesa-Davila M, Naber KG. Risk factors and predisposing conditions for urinary tract infection. Ther Adv Urol. 2019;11:1756287218814382. doi: 10.1177/1756287218814382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nielubowicz GR, Mobley HL. Host-pathogen interactions in urinary tract infection. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7:430–441. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gashaw M, Berhane M, Bekele S, Kibru G, Teshager L, Yilma Y, Ahmed Y, Fentahun N, Assefa H, Wieser A, Gudina EK, Ali S. Emergence of high drug resistant bacterial isolates from patients with health care associated infections at Jimma University medical center: a cross sectional study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7:138. doi: 10.1186/s13756-018-0431-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ismail B, Shafei MN, Harun A, Ali S, Omar M, Deris ZZ. Predictors of polymyxin B treatment failure in Gram-negative healthcare-associated infections among critically ill patients. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018;51:763–769. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2017.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhang P, Shi Q, Hu H, Hong B, Wu X, Du X, Akova M, Yu Y. Emergence of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in China. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(124):e1–e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yin D, Wu S, Yang Y, Shi Q, Dong D, Zhu D, Hu F, China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network Study G. Results from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2017 of the in vitro activities of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 13.Loubet P, Ranfaing J, Dinh A, Dunyach-Remy C, Bernard L, Bruyere F, Lavigne JP, Sotto A. Alternative therapeutic options to antibiotics for the treatment of urinary tract infections. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1509. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wagenlehner FM, Naber KG. A step further in a vaccine for Escherichia coli. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:565–567. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30069-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brumbaugh AR, Mobley HL. Preventing urinary tract infection: progress toward an effective Escherichia coli vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2012;11:663–676. doi: 10.1586/erv.12.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mainil J. Escherichia coli virulence factors. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2013;152:2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2012.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mulvey MA, Lopez-Boado YS, Wilson CL, Roth R, Parks WC, Heuser J, Hultgren SJ. Induction and evasion of host defenses by type 1-piliated uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science. 1998;282:1494–1497. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5393.1494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huttner A, Gambillara V. The development and early clinical testing of the ExPEC4V conjugate vaccine against uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:1046–1050. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brumbaugh AR, Smith SN, Subashchandrabose S, Himpsl SD, Hazen TH, Rasko DA, Mobley HL. Blocking yersiniabactin import attenuates extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in cystitis and pyelonephritis and represents a novel target to prevent urinary tract infection. Infect Immun. 2015;83:1443–1450. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02904-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Agarwal J, Srivastava S, Singh M. Pathogenomics of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2012;30:141–149. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.96657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tarchouna M, Ferjani A, Ben-Selma W, Boukadida J. Distribution of uropathogenic virulence genes in Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infection. Int J Infect Dis. 2013;17:e450–e453. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hasanzadeh S, Habibi M, Shokrgozar MA, Ahangari Cohan R, Ahmadi K, Asadi Karam MR, Bouzari S. In silico analysis and in vivo assessment of a novel epitope-based vaccine candidate against uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Sci Rep. 2020;10:16258. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73179-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Doumith M, Day MJ, Hope R, Wain J, Woodford N. Improved multiplex PCR strategy for rapid assignment of the four major Escherichia coli phylogenetic groups. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:3108–3110. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01468-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lee JH, Subhadra B, Son YJ, Kim DH, Park HS, Kim JM, Koo SH, Oh MH, Kim HJ, Choi CH. Phylogenetic group distributions, virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance properties of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with urinary tract infections in South Korea. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2016;62:84–90. doi: 10.1111/lam.12517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Er DK, Dundar D, Uzuner H, Osmani A. Relationship between phylogenetic groups, antibiotic resistance and patient characteristics in terms of adhesin genes in cystitis and pyelonephritis isolates of Escherichia coli. Microb Pathog. 2015;89:188–194. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yazdanpour Z, Tadjrobehkar O, Shahkhah M. Significant association between genes encoding virulence factors with antibiotic resistance and phylogenetic groups in community acquired uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolates. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20:241. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01933-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Paniagua-Contreras GL, Monroy-Perez E, Bautista A, Reyes R, Vicente A, Vaca-Paniagua F, Diaz CE, Martinez S, Dominguez P, Garcia LR, Uribe-Garcia A, Vaca S. Multiple antibiotic resistances and virulence markers of uropathogenic Escherichia coli from Mexico. Pathog Glob Health. 2018;112:415–420. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2018.1547542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Munkhdelger Y, Gunregjav N, Dorjpurev A, Juniichiro N, Sarantuya J. Detection of virulence genes, phylogenetic group and antibiotic resistance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in Mongolia. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2017;11:51–57. doi: 10.3855/jidc.7903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Waisbren BA, Arena J. Shock associated with bacteremia due to gram-negative bacilli. Autopsy findings. Arch Intern Med. 1965;116:336–339. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1965.03870030016004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Johnson JR, Stell AL. Extended virulence genotypes of Escherichia coli strains from patients with urosepsis in relation to phylogeny and host compromise. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:261–272. doi: 10.1086/315217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Satlin MJ, Lewis JS, Weinstein MP, Patel J, Humphries RM, Kahlmeter G, Giske CG, Turnidge J. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing position statements on polymyxin b and colistin clinical breakpoints. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:e523–e529. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wiegand I, Geiss HK, Mack D, Sturenburg E, Seifert H. Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases among Enterobacteriaceae by use of semiautomated microbiology systems and manual detection procedures. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1167–1174. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01988-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Anonymous. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 30th ed. CLSI supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. 2020.
  • 34.Pompilio A, Crocetta V, Savini V, Petrelli D, Di Nicola M, Bucco S, Amoroso L, Bonomini M, Di Bonaventura G. Phylogenetic relationships, biofilm formation, motility, antibiotic resistance and extended virulence genotypes among Escherichia coli strains from women with community-onset primitive acute pyelonephritis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0196260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jaureguy F, Carbonnelle E, Bonacorsi S, Clec'h C, Casassus P, Bingen E, Picard B, Nassif X, Lortholary O. Host and bacterial determinants of initial severity and outcome of Escherichia coli sepsis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13:854–862. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01775.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Otto G, Magnusson M, Svensson M, Braconier J, Svanborg C. Pap genotype and P fimbrial expression in Escherichia coli causing bacteremic and nonbacteremic febrile urinary tract infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:1523–1531. doi: 10.1086/320511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Surgers L, Boyd A, Girard PM, Arlet G, Decre D. Biofilm formation by ESBL-producing strains of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int J Med Microbiol. 2019;309:13–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2018.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Garcia TA, Ventura CL, Smith MA, Merrell DS, O'Brien AD. Cytotoxic necrotizing factor 1 and hemolysin from uropathogenic Escherichia coli elicit different host responses in the murine bladder. Infect Immun. 2013;81:99–109. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00605-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lu Y, Rafiq A, Zhang Z, Aslani F, Fijak M, Lei T, Wang M, Kumar S, Klug J, Bergmann M, Chakraborty T, Meinhardt A, Bhushan S. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli virulence factor hemolysin A causes programmed cell necrosis by altering mitochondrial dynamics. FASEB J. 2018;32:4107–4120. doi: 10.1096/fj.201700768R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Real JM, Munro P, Buisson-Touati C, Lemichez E, Boquet P, Landraud L. Specificity of immunomodulator secretion in urinary samples in response to infection by alpha-hemolysin and CNF1 bearing uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Cytokine. 2007;37:22–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2007.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Johnsen N, Hamilton ADM, Greve AS, Christensen MG, Therkildsen JR, Wehmoller J, Skals M, Praetorius HA. Alpha-haemolysin production, as a single factor, causes fulminant sepsis in a model of Escherichia coli-induced bacteraemia. Cell Microbiol. 2019;21:e13017. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mora-Rillo M, Fernandez-Romero N, Navarro-San Francisco C, Diez-Sebastian J, Romero-Gomez MP, Fernandez FA, Lopez JRA, Mingorance J. Impact of virulence genes on sepsis severity and survival in Escherichia coli bacteremia. Virulence. 2015;6:93–100. doi: 10.4161/21505594.2014.991234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mittal S, Sharma M, Chaudhary U. Biofilm and multidrug resistance in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Pathog Glob Health. 2015;109:26–29. doi: 10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Calhau V, Domingues S, Ribeiro G, Mendonca N, Da Silva GJ. Interplay between pathogenicity island carriage, resistance profile and plasmid acquisition in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64:828–835. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Javed S, Mirani ZA, Pirzada ZA. Phylogenetic group B2 expressed significant biofilm formation among drug resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Libyan J Med. 2021;16:1845444. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2020.1845444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tewawong N, Kowaboot S, Pimainog Y, Watanagul N, Thongmee T, Poovorawan Y. Distribution of phylogenetic groups, adhesin genes, biofilm formation, and antimicrobial resistance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from hospitalized patients in Thailand. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10453. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Karam MRA, Habibi M, Bouzari S. Relationships between virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli isolated from urinary tract infections and commensal isolates in Tehran, Iran. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2018;9:217–224. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.5.02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Costantini E, Carlin M, Porta M, Brizzi MF. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and sepsis: state of the art, certainties and missing evidence. Acta Diabetol. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s00592-021-01728-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset of the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES