Abstract
Elizabethkingia meningosepticum (E. meningosepticum) is a ubiquitous microorganism previously known as Chryseobacterium meningosepticum. It is emerging as a pathogen responsible for bacteremia in the immunocompromised population, particularly in cancer patients and those with a history of prolonged hospital stay and frequent instrumentations. A retrospective chart review of all cases over 10 years at the Moffitt Cancer Center showed a total of three patients with E. meningosepticum infection. The first patient (history of multiple myeloma) underwent endoscopy complicated by aspiration pneumonia and positive blood culture for E. meningosepticum infection. The second patient (current acute myelogenous leukemia) had neutropenic fever in the setting of a recent chest port infection. Blood culture from the chest port showed E. meningosepticum. The third patient (history of esophageal adenocarcinoma and acute myelogenous leukemia) had a history of recent pneumonia and cellulitis who presented with recurrent neutropenic fever. Blood culture was positive for E. meningosepticum. E. meningosepticum bacteremia has a high 28-day mortality rate (41%). As these three cases illustrate, early identification of the pathogen along with empiric treatment with a fluoroquinolone and/or minocycline is indicated to reduce morbidity and mortality.
Keywords: cancer patients, severe sepsis, neutropenia, urinary tract infection, gram-negative bacteremia, coagulase-negative staphylococcus, elizabethkingia
Introduction
Elizabethkingia is ubiquitously found in nature and is not a part of the normal human flora [1]. It is a biofilm-forming, non-motile, non-fermenting beta-hemolytic, oxidase and catalase-positive, Gram-negative bacilli that grow yellow-colored colonies after 48 hours of incubation at 37° C in enriched media. Elizabethkingia meningosepticum (E. meningosepticum) was originally identified as Flavobacterium meningosepticum by Elizabeth King in 1959 as she studied unclassified bacteria associated with meningitis in infants [2]. The genus was reclassified in 1994 and the bacteria with the aforementioned characteristics were placed under Chryseobacterium meningosepticum. By 2005, after extensive phylogenetic studies, it was placed under the genus Elizabethkingia [1].
Elizabethkingia infections were more commonly associated with outbreaks of neonatal meningitis; however, they have recently emerged to be an important cause of bacteremia in immunocompromised individuals, especially in those with a history of prolonged hospital stays and frequent instrumentation [3,4]. E. meningosepticum survives in chlorine-treated municipal water and colonizes sinks, basins, and saline solutions. It also has the propensity to colonize medical equipment, making it a significant cause of nosocomial infections in immunocompromised individuals [5]. In this case series, we report three cases of E. meningosepticum bacteremia seen in patients with underlying malignancies who were successfully treated with a multidrug regimen.
Case presentation
Case 1
A 72-year-old male with a past history of metastatic melanoma (treated with excision and radiation, with no current evidence of recurrence), Barrett’s esophagus, and asthma presented for a routine follow-up endoscopy for Barrett’s esophagus. During the endoscopy, the patient became hypoxic after induction of anesthesia and had wheezing. The patient was intubated and admitted to the ICU for possible bronchospasm or aspiration. Vital signs were significant for hypotension (90/69 mmHg), tachycardia (139 bpm [beats per minute]), and temperature of 35.9° C. Labs were notable for leukocytosis (11,000/ml), pre-renal acute kidney injury (blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 21 mg/dL, creatinine 1.4 mg/dL), and respiratory acidosis (pH 7.22, pCO2 60.0). CT of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis showed extensive consolidation predominantly in the left lung and the right lower lobe consistent with multifocal pneumonia (Figure 1). Meropenem and minocycline were empirically started. Blood cultures were positive for E. meningosepticum and susceptible to ciprofloxacin and minocycline. Antibiotics were changed to ciprofloxacin, cefoxitin, minocycline, and metronidazole for broad-spectrum coverage until the susceptible organism was identified. Following the identification of E. meningosepticum, antibiotic coverage was deescalated to align with susceptibility results. His respiratory status improved, and he was extubated after 48 hours. Follow-up blood culture had no growth. He continued to improve clinically and was discharged on ciprofloxacin and minocycline for an additional 10 days.
Figure 1. CT of the thorax on axial (A) and coronal (B) planes showing extensive consolidation of the left lung consistent with multifocal pneumonia.
Case 2
A 50-year-old female with relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), previously treated with 7+3 induction therapy and high-dose cytarabine cycle for consolidation was admitted for cladribine-based salvage chemotherapy. She was recently hospitalized at another institute for a chest port infection. She was treated with intravenous vancomycin, but the port was not removed. At the time of admission, she was febrile (38.5° C), normotensive (118/73 mmHg), had tachycardic (119 bpm), and had a normal respiratory rate. Labs were notable for bicytopenia (hemoglobin 9.7 g/dL, platelets 26,000/ml) and a leukocyte count of 4,050/mL. She was started on empiric antibiotics with meropenem, minocycline, and tobramycin with the removal of the chest port. Blood cultures were positive for Leclercia adecarboxylata and E. meningosepticum (susceptible to ciprofloxacin and minocycline). She was transitioned to ciprofloxacin, meropenem, and minocycline. She later developed neutropenic fever for which voriconazole and acyclovir were added. Repeat blood culture was negative and she was discharged to hospice after relapsed leukemia was noted per bone marrow biopsy after the initiation of cladribine-based salvage chemotherapy.
Case 3
A 65-year-old male with an oncologic history of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (stage IV) and AML was treated with 5-azacytidine (Vidaza®). He was admitted with a new onset of productive cough with blood-tinged sputum for two days and pleuritic chest pain. His past infectious history was notable for pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa followed by mild pneumonia and right lower extremity cellulitis. He recently completed a treatment course of daptomycin. On examination, he was normotensive (BP 140/70 mmHg), had tachycardia (110 bpm), and had a normal respiratory rate with an oxygen saturation of 97% on room air. Physical examination was notable for decreased breath sounds and a right upper chest port with no evidence of infection. His labs were significant for pancytopenia (WBCs: 2,200/mL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC): 1010/mL, hemoglobin: 8.7 g/dL, platelets: 13,000/mL), and acute kidney injury (AKI) (creatinine: 1.4 mg/dL). CT of the thorax showed clustered ground glass nodularity in the left lower lobe indicating focal infection, pulmonary consolidation and adjacent atelectasis of the left lower lobe, and a small left pneumothorax (Figure 2). He was empirically started on piperacillin-tazobactam, which was later changed to meropenem after isolation of Gram-negative rods from blood cultures. Blood and sputum cultures were positive for E. meningosepticum sensitive to minocycline, and ciprofloxacin and minocycline were initiated (Table 1). Follow-up blood cultures were negative. His hospital course was complicated by multi-organ failure (worsening AKI, septic shock, and acute respiratory failure) and required tracheostomy. Following goals of care discussion, withdrawal of care was decided and comfort measures were initiated. He subsequently expired two days later.
Table 1. Susceptibility results for Elizabethkingia meningosepticum in Case 3.
R: resistant; I: intermediate; MDIL: minimum dilutional inhibitory level; MINT: minimum inhibitory concentration interpretation
| Antibiotic | MDIL | MINT |
| Ampicillin | ≥32 | R |
| Ampicillin/Sulbactam | ≥32 | R |
| Cefazolin | ≥64 | R |
| Cefepime | 32 | R |
| Cefoxitin | ≥64 | R |
| Ciprofloxacin | 2 | I |
| Gentamicin | ≥16 | R |
| Meropenem | ≥16 | R |
| Piperacillin/Tazobactam | ≥128 | R |
| Tobramycin | ≥16 | R |
| Trimethoprim/Sulfa | 80 | R |
Figure 2. CT of the thorax showing regions of pulmonary consolidation in the left lung.
Discussion
Infection is a well-known complication in cancer patients that can lead to prolonged hospital stays. Severe sepsis, defined as a systemic inflammatory response leading to acute organ dysfunction, accounts for 16.4 cases per 1000 people with cancer per year [6]. According to the same study, severe sepsis accounts for 8.5% of all cancer deaths. Angus et al. show that one in every six patients with severe sepsis has underlying malignancies that put them at a 30% higher risk of mortality as compared to other patients with severe sepsis [7].
Common causes of bloodstream infections in neutropenic patients include Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. This is followed by Gram-positive bacteria, most commonly from coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. One of the newer and rarer causes of infection is the Gram-negative rod Elizabethkingia meningosepticum [8]. There is a rising trend in the number of E. meningosepticum infections in hospitalized individuals with severe chronic diseases, especially in the past five years. This suggests that E. meningosepticum is emerging as an important pathogen in the immunocompromised population. A recent study noted 118 cases of various presentations of E. meningosepticum in Taiwan and suggested a strong connection of the infection with underlying comorbidities like malignancy (36%) and diabetes mellitus (25%) [9].
In another study of 16 patients, E. meningosepticum bacteremia was associated with nosocomial infections such as pneumonia, endocarditis, soft tissue infections, osteomyelitis, and catheter-related bacteremia [10]. Only two out of the 16 patients in this study had underlying malignancies. Lab findings were significant for leukocytosis in seven patients and leukopenia in two patients. Some patients were also found to have thrombocytopenia (Platelet <100,000/uL). Only three patients had normal blood counts. In our case series, Case 1 showed leukocytosis (WBC 11,000/mL), and Cases 2 and 3 showed thrombocytopenia (Platelet 26,000/mL) and leukopenia (WBC 2,200/mL) respectively in the setting of E. meningosepticum infection; however, this may also be related to their hematological malignancies and chemotherapy and not the ongoing infection (Table 2). It is known that appropriate antimicrobial therapy may be ineffective in resolving E. meningosepticum bacteremia if the implanted devices that are colonized are not identified and removed [11]. Disinfection of instruments and medical equipment with 70% alcohol, reducing the use of unnecessary medical devices and invasive procedures, and replacing faulty equipment have been suggested as methods to contain outbreaks [10].
Table 2. Summary of case findings from the retrospective chart review.
AML: acute myelogenous leukemia
| Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | |
| Age (years) | 72 | 50 | 65 |
| Gender (male/female) | Male | Female | Male |
| Past Medical History | Metastatic melanoma | Relapsed AML | Esophageal adenocarcinoma (stage IV), AML, pneumonia |
| Blood Pressure (mmHg) | 90/69 | 118/73 | 140/70 |
| Heart Rate (bpm) | 139 | 119 | 110 |
| Body Temperature (°C) | 35.9 | 38.5 | - |
| Isolated Microorganism | Elizabethkingia meningosepticum | Elizabethkingia meningosepticum, Leclercia adecarboxylata | Elizabethkingia meningosepticum |
| Pharmacological Treatment | ciprofloxacin, cefoxitin, minocycline, metronidazole | ciprofloxacin, meropenem, minocycline | ciprofloxacin, minocycline |
The etiology of sepsis in neutropenic patients has shifted from Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacteremia over the past few decades. Multidrug-resistant, Gram-negative bacilli are becoming increasingly challenging to treat and therefore current guidelines recommend the use of an anti-pseudomonal beta-lactamase with or without an additional antimicrobial as the empiric therapy in Gram-negative bacteremia [12]. E. meningosepticum is widely resistant to antibiotics frequently prescribed for Gram-negative bacteremia [13]. Many Elizabethkingia spp. possess two different types of β-lactamases: class A extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) rendering them resistant to all β-lactam including carbapenems, aztreonam, tigecycline, and polymyxin [14]. Some patients had a history of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas or Klebsiella infection, which was being treated with colistin prior to acquiring an E. meningosepticum infection. Prior treatment with colistin had a strong association with the emergence of E. meningosepticum bacteremia in these cases owing to their unusual patterns of resistance [15]. High levels of antimicrobial resistance may also be attributed to the patients’ prior history of preceding broad-spectrum antibiotic use, which has been previously shown to be a common factor in infected patients [16].
E. meningosepticum shows varied degrees of susceptibility to antibiotics used to treat Gram-positive infections including piperacillin-tazobactam, fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), vancomycin, and rifampicin [17]. This unique nature makes it difficult to choose the appropriate antibiotic therapy. In the 1990s, vancomycin and rifampicin were considered the optimal choice for empiric therapy; however, increased resistance to these drugs has led to decreased usage. More recently, TMP-SMX and fluoroquinolones have shown excellent in vitro activity against E. meningosepticum making these the empirical therapy of choice [18]. The superior outcome with fluoroquinolone is attributed to its pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic properties along with the ability to maintain optimal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels in vivo [19]. Another study reported that patients with E. meningosepticum bacteremia had 100% susceptibility to minocycline and 74.4% susceptibility to TMP-SMX and ciprofloxacin [20]. All the patients in our case series showed a good response to a combination of minocycline and ciprofloxacin.
Therefore, a combination therapy is recommended over monotherapy in multidrug-resistant E. meningosepticum bacteremia. It has been suggested that prolonged therapy with combinations of rifampin with vancomycin, TMP-SMX, minocycline, or fluoroquinolones may have better clinical outcomes [21]. There is a high 28- day mortality rate (41%) associated with E. meningosepticum bacteremia in healthcare-associated bacteremia in adults with underlying conditions [22]. Given the increased risk of mortality and multidrug resistance associated with the organism, it is imperative that clinicians are able to detect and treat the infection appropriately.
Conclusions
There is a rising trend of E. meningosepticum bacteremia in cancer patients with multiple comorbidities due to prolonged hospitalization and frequent instrumentation. In this report, we present three patients with a hematologic malignancy and neutropenia who developed E. meningosepticum infection. Given the challenging clinical course of these patients, it is important to recognize this pathogen as an important cause of bacteremia in immunocompromised patients. Early identification of the pathogen along with empiric treatment with a fluoroquinolone and/or minocycline is imperative to reduce morbidity and mortality.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study
References
- 1.Case series: Elizabethkingia meningosepticum. Dias M, Fernandes A, Furtado Z. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6:1550–1551. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4076.2557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Studies on a group of previously unclassified bacteria associated with meningitis in infants. KI EO. Am J Clin Pathol. 1959;31:241–247. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/31.3.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Transmission of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica (formerly Chryseobacterium meningosepticum) to tissue-allograft recipients: a report of two cases. Cartwright EJ, Prabhu RM, Zinderman CE, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1501–1506. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chryseobacterium meningosepticum: an emerging pathogen among immunocompromised adults. Report of 6 cases and literature review. Bloch KC, Nadarajah R, Jacobs R. Medicine (Baltimore) 1997;76:30–41. doi: 10.1097/00005792-199701000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Elizabethkingia meningoseptica bacteremia in immunocompromised hosts: The first case series from India. Ghafur A, Vidyalakshmi PR, Priyadarshini K, Easow JM, Raj R, Raja T. South Asian J Cancer. 2013;2:211–215. doi: 10.4103/2278-330X.119912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hospitalized cancer patients with severe sepsis: analysis of incidence, mortality, and associated costs of care. Williams MD, Braun LA, Cooper LM, Johnston J, Weiss RV, Qualy RL, Linde-Zwirble W. Crit Care. 2004;8:0–8. doi: 10.1186/cc2893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1303–1310. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Immunocompromised hosts: infections and biomarkers. Kulkarni AP. South Asian J Cancer. 2013;2:209–210. doi: 10.4103/2278-330X.119907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Clinical features, antimicrobial susceptibilities, and outcomes of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica (Chryseobacterium meningosepticum) bacteremia at a medical center in Taiwan, 1999-2006. Hsu MS, Liao CH, Huang YT, Liu CY, Yang CJ, Kao KL, Hsueh PR. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30:1271–1278. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1223-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Flavobacterium meningosepticum bacteremia: an analysis of 16 cases. Liu CE, Wong WW, Yang SP, Wang FD, Fung CP, You KW, Liu CY. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10222599/ Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 1999;62:125–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Elizabethkingia meningoseptica peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patient: a rare case report with diagnostic challenges. Ranjan S, Veerappan I, Patil SP, Sethuraman R. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2017;60:626–628. doi: 10.4103/IJPM.IJPM_28_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Changing aetiology, clinical features, antimicrobial resistance, and outcomes of bloodstream infection in neutropenic cancer patients. Gudiol C, Bodro M, Simonetti A, et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:474–479. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03879.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Molecular and biochemical heterogeneity of class B carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamases in Chryseobacterium meningosepticum. Bellais S, Aubert D, Naas T, Nordmann P. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1878–1886. doi: 10.1128/aac.44.7.1878-1886.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Multidrug resistant Elizabethkingia meningoseptica bacteremia - experience from a level 1 trauma centre in India. Govindaswamy A, Bajpai V, Trikha V, Mittal S, Malhotra R, Mathur P. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2018;7:172–176. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2018.01077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Elizabethkingia meningoseptica: emerging nosocomial pathogen in bedside hemodialysis patients. Ratnamani MS, Rao R. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2013;17:304–307. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.120323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Elizabethkingia meningoseptica: an important emerging pathogen causing healthcare-associated infections. Jean SS, Lee WS, Chen FL, Ou TY, Hsueh PR. J Hosp Infect. 2014;86:244–249. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.In vitro antibiotic synergy against Flavobacterium meningosepticum: implications for therapeutic options. Di Pentima MC, Mason EO Jr, Kaplan SL. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1169–1176. doi: 10.1086/520309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Elizabethkingia meningosepticum in a patient with six-year bilateral perma-catheters. Boroda K, Li L. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2014;2014:985306. doi: 10.1155/2014/985306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of fluoroquinolone and non-fluoroquinolone treatment in patients with Elizabethkingia meningoseptica bacteraemia. Huang YC, Lin YT, Wang FD. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;51:47–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Identification and epidemiological relatedness of clinical Elizabethkingia meningoseptica isolates from central Taiwan. Chang YC, Lo HH, Hsieh HY, Chang SM. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2014;47:318–323. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Multiresistant Elizabethkingia meningoseptica infections in tertiary care. Khan ID, Lall M, Sen S, Ninawe SM, Chandola P. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71:282–286. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Clinical and microbiological analysis of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica bacteremia in adult patients in Taiwan. Lin YT, Chiu CH, Chan YJ, Lin ML, Yu KW, Wang FD, Liu CY. Scand J Infect Dis. 2009;41:628–634. doi: 10.1080/00365540903089476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


