Skip to main content
NCBI home page
JMIR Serious Games logoLink to JMIR Serious Games
. 2021 Oct 27;9(4):e27848. doi: 10.2196/27848

An Interactive Physical-Cognitive Game-Based Training System Using Kinect for Older Adults: Development and Usability Study

Teerawat Kamnardsiri 1,2,#, Kochaphan Phirom 3, Sirinun Boripuntakul 3,#, Somporn Sungkarat 3,✉,#
Editor: Nabil Zary
Reviewed by: Maryalice Jordan-Marsh, Yanxin Zhang, Diego Roberto Colombo Dias, Ralf Dörner, Cecilia Sik-Lanyi
PMCID: PMC8581754  PMID: 34704953

Abstract

Background

Declines in physical and cognitive functions are recognized as important risk factors for falls in older adults. Promising evidence suggests that interactive game-based systems that allow simultaneous physical and cognitive exercise are a potential approach to enhance exercise adherence and reduce fall risk in older adults. However, a limited number of studies have reported the development of a combined physical-cognitive game-based training system for fall risk reduction in older adults.

Objective

The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the usability of an interactive physical-cognitive game-based training system (game-based exercise) for older adults.

Methods

In the development phase (Part I), a game-based exercise prototype was created by integrating knowledge and a literature review as well as brainstorming with experts on effective fall prevention exercise for older adults. The output was a game-based exercise prototype that covers crucial physical and cognitive components related to falls. In the usability testing (Part II), 5 games (ie, Fruits Hunter, Where Am I?, Whack a Mole, Sky Falls, and Crossing Poison River) with three difficulty levels (ie, beginner, intermediate, and advanced levels) were tested in 5 older adults (mean age 70.40 years, SD 5.41 years). After completing the games, participants rated their enjoyment level while engaging with the games using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) and commented on the games. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the participants’ characteristics and PACES scores.

Results

The results showed that the average PACES score was 123 out of 126 points overall and between 6.66 and 7.00 for each item, indicating a high level of enjoyment. Positive feedback, such as praise for the well-designed interactions and user-friendly interfaces, was also provided.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that it is promising to implement an interactive, physical-cognitive game-based exercise in older adults. The effectiveness of a game-based exercise program for fall risk reduction has yet to be determined.

Keywords: digital game, interactive game-based training, physical-cognitive training, exergaming, Kinect sensors, older adults, falls, PACES, user-centered design, game-based exercise

Introduction

Declines in multiple physiological systems with ageing contribute to balance and gait deficits, leading to an increased risk of fall [1]. Fall is a serious public health problem, and its consequences have a marked adverse impact on physical and psychological aspects such as injuries, activity restriction, fear of falling, and loss of autonomy [2-4]. Given the substantial impact of falls on health, as well as their medical and economic burden, an effective strategy to prevent falls in older adults is warranted.

Several investigators have consistently reported a strong positive effect of physical exercise on fall prevention among older adults [5-9]. Researchers have also identified a critical role of cognition, especially executive function, attention, and memory, on balance and gait control [10-13]. Many examiners have demonstrated that cognitive training, which is an intervention program aimed at improving, maintaining, or restoring cognitive function via the repeated and structured practice of tasks, can improve balance and gait and reduce fall risk [14-17]. Taken together, incorporating a cognitive component into physical exercise may augment its benefits in fall prevention [11-13,18-20]. A growing number of investigators have documented the effects of combined physical-cognitive exercise training in a simultaneous form (dual-tasking) among older adults. Combined physical-cognitive exercise training programs have resulted in greater improvement in physical and cognitive performance than either type of single training alone [21-25].

As technology advances, a new alternative of rehabilitation approach targeting training of various physical and cognitive components in the form of interactive game-based exercises (exergames) is becoming available [26]. These interactive game-based exercises use technology-driven platforms that require users to move their body in order to complete assigned tasks via video game interface elements [27]. The interactive game-based exercises have advantages in terms of gamification features. Researchers have demonstrated that exergames are attractive because they provide real-time interaction and feedback to users, which enhances motivation and training adherence [28,29]. In addition, game-based exercises allow users to be active with repetitive practice and track progression, which is beneficial for training outcomes [30]. Another advantage of exergames is that they can offer an experience for daily-life task requirements based on concurrent training of physical and cognitive components [31-33]. Moreover, game-based exercises can be applied either in rehabilitation centers or community and home settings [33,34]. Several researchers have shown that game-based training using Nintendo Wii Fit, and Microsoft Kinect sensors were effective in improving physical abilities (eg, balance, gait performance), improving cognitive abilities (eg, executive function, speed of processing), and reducing the risk of falls among older adults [35-42]. However, in most existing training programs available for fall prevention, research concerning simultaneous training of physical and cognitive functions (dual tasking) with the use of exergames has remained scarce.

Among interactive game-based technology for training, the Kinect motion sensor (Microsoft Corporation) has been considered as a high-potential approach because it provides a markerless full-body 3D motion tracker and enables users to virtually interact hands-free with a computer system. Additionally, several examiners have demonstrated that among interactive game-based technology for exercising, Microsoft Kinect has an advantage in that it allows individuals to interact with games using their own body in a natural way [43,44]; this enhances the natural form of human-computer interaction [45]. In addition, the Microsoft Kinect motion sensor is an accurate input device; thus, it allows precise tracking and real-time feedback of user performance [46]. The Microsoft Kinect sensor is proposed to be a feasible and effective tool for training concurrent physical and cognitive components in older adults, with the aim of reducing the intrinsic causes (ie, physical and cognitive) of falls [47-51].

Based on the usability challenges faced by older adults, programmers should develop user interfaces that are user-friendly for older adults and specific for training purposes. A previous investigator has suggested that older adults accept innovative technology when they recognize its benefit and find it meaningful for their lives [52].

Therefore, this study focused on developing a prototype of a game-based exercise that accounts for the target user’s expectation and requirement (eg, enjoyment, attractiveness, user skill-challenge balance, and benefit for training cognitive and physical components). In particular, following a user-centered design approach, acceptability and training adherence in future empirical studies were established.

Methods

Study Design

The present study consists of two parts: (1) the development of a game-based exercise prototype, and (2) evaluation of target users’ feedback, response, and satisfaction regarding the developed game-based exercise prototype. The concept of development and evaluation of the target user’s experience for producing a final prototype followed a user-centered design (UCD) approach [27,46,53-62]. UCD is a user interface design process in which designers focus on gaining a target user’s perspective to create a product with a high degree of usability. The UCD cycle is depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Schematic of the user-centered design cycle [27].

Part I: Development of a Game-Based Exercise Prototype

Development Process

In this part, the 4-phase UCD process was applied [27,46,53-62]. The first phase, the design development process of a game-based exercise prototype, was conducted in the brainstorming phase. A total of 7 team members, including 3 physical therapists and 1 physician (3-20 years of experience in geriatric and cognitive rehabilitation), 2 game programmers (5 years of experience in the Unity 3D game engine), and 1 game designer (10 years of experience in game design and game theory), participated in the brainstorming session. This phase involved generating potential core game ideas by integrating the knowledge and literature review of previous physical and cognitive training programs and interactive exergame interventions for fall prevention in older adults [16,63-65]. In the present study, the core game was composed of two training elements: (1) a physical element, including stepping and balance training, and (2) a cognitive element related to balance and falls in older adults, including executive function, attention, and memory [18,66,67]. To ensure that the difficulty of the games was appropriate for each individual user, the progression of game difficulty was considered. The game-based training program underwent critical appraisal by the physical therapists and physician. In the second phase, after consensus, proven game ideas were used to create a game-based digital exercise game prototype using the Unity 3D game engine software with Kinect Sensor V2 for Windows. In the third phase, user feedback to improve the game-based exercise prototype was provided by end users using a think-aloud method [68]. Finally, the fourth phase concentrated on assessing physical activity enjoyment during game engagement. The Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) questionnaire [69,70], an 18-item scale questionnaire, was used to analyze physical activity enjoyment. Moreover, the usability of the game-based exercise prototype was determined with a structured interview (feedback about the game, themes, user interface, sound effect, graphics, and interaction). Feedback from all participants was considered by the research team to improve the game-based exercise prototype.

Characteristics of the Game-Based Exercise Prototype

The characteristics of the game-based exercise prototype are presented in Table 1. The game can be described as individual interactive game-based training using Kinect. The prototype of the game-based exercise comprised 5 games, including (1) Fruits Hunter, (2) Where Am I ?, (3) Whack a Mole, (4) Sky Falls, and (5) Crossing Poison River. The games had three different levels: beginner, intermediate, and advanced. The level of game complexity progressed by increasing the difficulty of physical demand (ie, movement speed, distance, duration, base of support) and cognitive demand (ie, number of stimuli, complexity of the game’s rules, and amount of cognitive load). The estimated play time was 45 to 60 minutes.

Table 1.

Summary of the characteristics of the developed game-based exercise prototype.

Characteristic Description
Basic characteristics

Health topic A game-based exercise prototype

Targeted age group Older adults (age ≥65 years)

Short description of the game idea The game-based exercise is a virtual, interactive game-based training system using Microsoft Kinect motion sensor technology. The game-based exercise comprises 5 games that include physical and cognitive components associated with balance and falls in older adults.

Target player Individual

Behavior change procedure used A game-based exercise is used to enhance motivation and engagement in older adults.

Clinical support needed Physical therapist and geriatric physicians

Data shared with clinician Data are saved and stored in the hard disk. However, reaction time, error, and score are given as feedback on the display screen (ie, the rubber mat) at the end of each game.

Type of game Physical, action, real-time strategy
Game components

Player’s game goal/objective


Physical components

  • Improve static and dynamic balance

  • Improve stepping reaction and response time

  • Improve lower limb muscle strength


Cognitive components

  • Fruits Hunter: improves response ability and speed of processing via a stepping task.

  • Where am I ?: improves semantic memory and visuospatial ability via visual sense

  • Whack a Mole: improves selective attention ability, visual attention performance, speed of processing, and inhibition ability

  • Sky Falls: improves sequencing and planning ability

  • Crossing Poison River: improve episodic memory via auditory sense


Rules

  • Fruits Hunter: step on the presented fruits as fast as possible within a limited time.

  • Where am I ?: step to the presented objects and remember as many as of them possible. The recall questions are provided at the end of the game.

  • Whack a Mole: respond correctly to different rules of this game as follows:

    • Mole or rabbit: steps on the target 1 time

    • Mole or rabbit with helmet: steps on the target 2 times

    • Bomb: do not step on the target

  • Sky Falls: step with alternating feet to collect as many dropping objects in the basket as possible

  • Crossing Poison River: listen to a short story and remember the content of the story while standing on one leg

Game mechanics The game-based exercise system allows users to interact with the virtual games by stepping on the presented targets in different directions in pursuit of the game’s goals. The game-based exercise also provides audio and visual feedback to the users while they are playing the games.

Virtual environment A forest with fruits, animals, vegetables, and a river

Setting The game-based exercise can be set in a room environment

Device requirements Personal computer/notebook/laptop with LED projector

Sensors used Microsoft Kinect Sensor V2

Estimated play time 45-60 minutes
Open in a new tab

Part II: Evaluation of Target User’s Experience

Recruitment and Participants

A total of 5 community-dwelling older adults were enrolled as representative target users. The inclusion criteria were (1) age 65 years or older, (2) had normal cognitive function (determined by a Mental State Examination T10 [71] score ≥24 points or depending on the level of education), (3) ability to walk without an assistive device for at least 10 m, and (4) ability to step in all directions independently and safely. Exclusion criteria were (1) depressive symptoms (determined by a Thai Geriatric Depression Scale-15 [72] score >6 points), (2) orthopedic deficits, neurological deficits, and/or other significant health problems that precluded the participant from completing the testing protocol, and (3) uncorrected visual and hearing impairment. The study protocol was approved by the Human Ethical Review Board of the principal investigator’s institute (AMSEC-61EX-078). All participants gave written informed consent prior to participating in the study. The demographic data of the participants, which consisted of age, height, weight, medication use, and history of falls in the previous 12 months, were recorded.

Hardware Configuration

To set up the system, the capture volume of the system was configured using the three main devices: Kinect Sensor V2 [73], LED projector, and laptop computer. In the present study, the Kinect Sensor V2 was used because it provides greater precision and more stable results compared to the Kinect Sensor V1 [74]. The Kinect Sensor V2 is a depth sensor camera manufactured by Microsoft that provides information about the depth, color, and skeleton of a user who is standing in front of the sensor. The Kinect sensor and LED projector were set on a portable metal storage rack at a height of 0.8 m and 2.0 m from the floor, respectively. The laptop computer that contained the developed game software was set near the Kinect sensor. The game was projected on a rubber mat (2.0 m width × 1.2 m height) that was placed on the floor; thus, the participants could virtually interact by stepping. The center of the rubber mat was set 2.5 m from the Microsoft Kinect sensor and LED projector. The configuration of hardware for playing the game-based exercise is illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Environment configuration of the game-based exercise system.

Protocol

The game-based exercise was connected with the Microsoft Kinect sensor, an LED projector, and the laptop computer. After that, the system was calibrated by moving four markers in the game-based training system over the four corner marks on the rubber mat. For individualized body position calibration, each participant was asked to perform a T-pose stand for approximately 5 seconds at the center of the rubber mat (Figure 2). After the calibration process, each participant received a comprehensive description of the rules of the games, including a demonstration, and was requested to play the game-based exercise. The American College Sport of Medicine exercise guidelines recommend that older adults should participate in aerobic activities for a minimum of 30 minutes per session to promote and maintain their health-related outcomes [75]. In this study, the exercise duration ranged between 30 and 50 minutes, with a rest interval of between 10 and 15 minutes, depending on the participant performance; this resulted in a total time of 45 to 60 minutes.

After completing the game-based exercise, participants were asked to rate their enjoyment using the PACES questionnaire [69,70]. The PACES is an 18-item scale questionnaire that assesses physical activity enjoyment during game engagement with a 7-point Likert scale (1, strongly disagree, to 7, strongly agree). A higher PACES score reflects a greater level of enjoyment. Moreover, using a structured interview, participants were interviewed about their impressions of the game-based exercise features in terms of rules, mechanics, interfaces, and scoring, as well as their physical and cognitive involvement while playing the games.

Data Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to describe both the participants’ characteristics and their scores on the 18-item PACES questionnaire. All data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 (IBM Corporation).

Results

Part I: Development of a Game-Based Exercise Prototype

The framework of the game-based exercise comprised 6 components (Figure 3), including:

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Framework of the game-based exercise system. GUI: graphical user interface.

  1. The Microsoft Kinect sensor: the depth sensor that was used to track and monitor full-body movements in 3D coordinates (ie, the x-, y-, and z-axes). The tracking data were then converted to the 24 points of the Joint ID Map (body skeleton model). In this study, 4 points of the Joint ID Map [43] (ANKLE_RIGHT, FOOT_RIGHT, ANKLE_LEFT and FOOT_LEFT) were used for the interaction between the user and the game.

  2. Game programmers: the specialists who generated the digital game using the computer programming language and game engine software (the Unity 3D game engine software with Microsoft Kinect sensor V2 for Windows).

  3. Domain knowledge: the experts having core knowledge and experience of physical and cognitive training programs for fall prevention in older adults.

  4. Game-based training system: the digital game system, which comprised 5 games (Games I-V) with 3 levels (levels 1-3) and feedback (ie, score, response time, and error).

  5. User and laptop computer: a system operator who was responsible for controlling the game-based training system while participants were playing the games.

  6. Graphical user interface: a form of user interface that allows participants to interact with the game-based exercise (Figure 4). An example of a participant training with the game-based exercise prototype is displayed in Figure 5.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Screenshots of the 5 games in the game-based exercise system: (A) Fruits Hunter, (B) Where Am I ?, (C) Whack a Mole, (D) Sky Falls, and (E) Crossing Poison River.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Examples of a participant playing the game-based exercise: (A) Whack a Mole, (B) Sky Falls, and (C) Crossing Poison River.

Part II: Evaluation of the Target Users’ Experience

Participant Characteristics

A total of 5 community-dwelling older adults participated in the usability testing phase. Their mean age was 70.40 (SD 5.41) years (range 65-79 years). No participants had any experience with using exergames. They had low incidence rate of falls in the past 12 months, and they either did not take medication or took only one type. The participants’ characteristics are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Characteristics of the study participants.

Characteristic Value Median Range
Age (years), mean (SD) 70.40 (5.41) 68 65-79
Height (cm), mean (SD) 155.20 (6.06) 156 149-164
Weight (kg), mean (SD) 53.40 (8.62) 55 39-60
BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD) 22.08 (2.63) 22.21 17.60-24.30
Education (years), mean (SD) 14.40 (5.90) 16 4-18
Types of medication, mean (SD) 0.20 (0.45) 0 0-1
Falls in the past year, n 1 0 0-1
Open in a new tab

User Experience in Using the Game-Based Exercise System

All 5 participants completed the game-based exercise and answered the PACES questionnaire. The average score on each item was between 6.66 and 7.00, which indicated greater levels of enjoyment. The 18-item PACES scores are illustrated in Table 3.

Table 3.

Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES) rating scores (n=5). All items were rated on a 7-point scale from 1, strongly disagree, to 7, strongly agree.

Question Participants Response rating, mean (SD)

S01 S02 S03 S04 S05
1. I enjoy it; I hate it 7 6 7 7 6 6.80 (0.20)
2. I feel interested; I feel bored 7 6 7 7 7 7.00 (0.00)
3. I like it; I dislike it 7 7 7 7 7 7.00 (0.00)
4. I find it pleasurable; I find it unpleasurable 7 7 7 6 6 6.66 (0.24)
5. I am very absorbed in this activity; I am not at all absorbed in this activity 6 7 7 7 7 6.80 (0.20)
6. It’s a lot of fun; it’s no fun at all 7 7 7 7 7 7.00 (0.00)
7. I find it energizing; I find it tiring 7 6 7 7 7 6.80 (0.20)
8. It makes me happy; it makes me depressed 7 7 7 7 7 7.00 (0.00)
9. It’s very pleasant; it’s very unpleasant 7 7 7 7 6 6.80 (0.20)
10. I feel good physically while doing it; I feel bad physically while doing it 7 7 7 7 7 7.00 (0.00)
11. It’s very invigorating; it’s not at all invigorating 7 7 7 6 7 6.80 (0.20)
12. I am not at all frustrated by it; I am very frustrated by it 7 7 7 7 7 7.00 (0.00)
13. It’s very gratifying; it’s not at all gratifying 7 7 7 6 6 6.66 (0.24)
14. It’s very exhilarating; it’s not at all exhilarating 7 7 7 7 6 6.80 (0.20)
15. It’s very stimulating; it’s not at all stimulating 7 7 7 6 7 6.80 (0.20)
16. It give me a strong sense of accomplishment; it does not give me any sense of accomplishment 7 7 7 6 7 6.80 (0.20)
17. It’s very refreshing; it’s not at all refreshing 7 7 6 6 7 6.66 (0.24)
18. I felt as though there was nothing else I would rather be doing; I felt as though I would rather be doing something else 7 7 7 7 6 6.80 (0.20)
Rating scale of all items (total points: 126) 125 123 125 120 120 123.00 (1.26)
Open in a new tab

User Feedback and Suggestions

The feedback and suggestions provided by the users are presented in Table 4.

Table 4.

Feedback and suggestions provided by the study participants for the game prototype.

Type of feedback or suggestion Feedback
Feedback

Positive

  • “The games’ feature and appearance were very attractive and enhanced my motivation to complete the games.”

  • “The games provided my performance with visible outcomes and scores which motivated me to try harder to get a better score in the next trial.”

  • “The difficultly of each game was optimal; it was not too easy and not too difficult.”

  • “The games had variety of forms and rules that challenged my physical and cognitive abilities.”

  • “The games had a meaningful sound effect which helped me to identify my right or wrong responses.”

  • “The games’ systems were quite simple to set up and easy to manage, thus it appeared to be feasible to use in the community or home settings.”

Negative

  • “In the Whack a Mole, sometimes I did not step on the bomb, but it eventually blew up.”

  • “In the Sky Falls, sometimes it was quite hard to control the movement of the bamboo basket even though I tried to alternate my stepping rhythmically.”
Suggestions

Game rules

  • Clearly state the game instructions and rules at the beginning

Level design

  • Reduce the speed of dropping objects in the beginner level of Sky Falls

  • Use different types of animals and vegetables for each difficulty level of Where Am I?

Graphics/look and feel

  • Adjust the distance of each presented object in Whack a Mole

Audio

  • Increase the display volume

  • Use different background music for each game
Open in a new tab

Discussion

Principal Findings

In this study, we aimed to develop and test the usability of a virtual, interactive game-based training system that is focused on simultaneously training the physical and cognitive function (dual-tasking) of community-dwelling older adults. The core games were formulated by integrating the principal knowledge and existing evidence from the literature related to effective fall prevention exercise programs for older adults as well as by subjecting the games to critical appraisal from experts. We also assessed older adults’ experiences in terms of enjoyment and game features using the PACES questionnaire and a structured interview.

Several intervention studies have reported high dropout rates and limited use of technology-supported platforms for delivering exercise training programs [76-78]. Interactive game-based training may be considered as a more efficient approach for empowering user engagement, which contributes to positive outcomes of an intervention. However, many older adults tend to be less engaged with modern digital technology, and not all are accepting of it. To overcome this limitation, the UCD approach, which incorporates game design principles (ie, goals, rules, feedback, points, time, reward structures, levels, and aesthetics), was used in the process of designing and developing a game-based exercise prototype with an aim to motivate and engage older adults in exercising [54-60]. Researchers have identified the potential benefits of using the UCD concept for developing exergames for older adults with and without health-related problems. For example, Hemingway et al [53] used the UCD process to develop a mobile game to influence the behavior of HIV service uptake among a key population. Lange et al [27] established an interactive game-based program constructed on a UCD design process for training the dynamic balance of individuals who have previously experienced a stroke. Howes et al [79] also used UCD to develop the bespoke Active Computer Gaming system to deliver strength and balance exercise programs for older adults. Together, the present and previous findings consistently suggest that the UCD approach is a core process that should be embedded in health games to ensure usability and acceptability. Therefore, the target users may benefit fully from exergames technology.

To our knowledge, our game-based exercise is the first game prototype that was mainly designed to support older adults in combined physical-cognitive exercising using the Microsoft Kinect motion sensor. In particular, the game-based exercise focused on the core impairment aspects that are related to falls in older adults, including balance and stepping performance as well as executive function, attention, and memory. Several investigators have consistently reported that the most important component of exercise programs for fall prevention is balance training [6,7]. In addition, stepping training, a form of highly specific balance training, has shown to be an effective fall prevention strategy [80]. Thus, balance and stepping training were included in the game-based exercise. Regarding cognition, declined executive function, attention, and memory have been identified as crucial contributors to falls [11-13,19]. Thus, adding these cognitive components to physical training may potentially enhance the efficacy of fall prevention programs for older adults. In addition, age-related perception and sensation decline in older adults were considered. Therefore, visual and audio presentations, such as the size and distance of target objects as well as the level of sound volume, were included. Findings from the study demonstrated that the target users viewed the game-based exercise prototype as an enjoyable and practical intervention approach for their physical and cognitive training at home and in community settings. This may be because the development of the game-based exercise prototype incorporated the current knowledge regarding the key contributing factors for training continuation by using exergames among older adults. These factors gradually increase the level of game difficulty, provide clearer feedback, and offer a simple setup [81]. In this way, we expected that the newly developed exergames would overcome the barrier to exercise in older adults. This enjoyment (determined by PACES scores) and positive feedback from the users may be, at least in part, due to the fundamental elements of the game-based exercise, which feature a real-time interface display and feedback. Consistent with previous studies, our games system provides feedback, including scores and performance outcomes (ie, response time, error), which enhances the motivation of the users [82-84]. Moreover, the positive responses from older learners who are unfamiliar with new technologies can be attributed to the design features of the game-based exercise prototype, such as having a user-friendly interface and providing optimal levels of task difficulty [85]. Nevertheless, some comments indicated that further refinements are required prior to implementation of the game-based exercise among older adults in a realistic context.

Limitations

This study has certain limitations that need to be acknowledged. This study is a preliminary study that involved a small number of participants who were all female. Further, results on the enjoyment and experiences of using the game-based exercise prototype were obtained from a single training session. Thus, the findings should be considered preliminary and interpreted with caution. Future studies with larger sample sizes, a balanced gender ratio, and data obtained from multiple training sessions are warranted. Another limitation concerns the hardware specification of the Microsoft Kinect sensor. In this study, the capture volume of the Kinect sensor was restricted to 0.5 to 4.5 m, which partly limited the design of the configurations of the games. Further studies should consider using multiple Kinect sensors to cover a greater capture volume. Moreover, our game system was designed for the individual player. Exergames systems that allow group players should be considered for promoting social interaction. Finally, this study investigated the enjoyment during game engagement using the 18-item PACES questionnaire. In future studies, the 8-item version of PACES would be an appropriate questionnaire to reduce the completion time.

Conclusions

This preliminary study demonstrated a prototype of a game-based exercise for older adults using the Microsoft Kinect sensor. The game-based exercise prototype contained combined physical and cognitive training elements with different levels of difficulty. The developed game-based exercise was well accepted by the target users, with prominent enjoyment and positive feedback. Thus, the game-based exercise appears to be a promising tool for enhancing older adults’ motivation to engage in physical-cognitive exercise with the aim to reduce the risk of falls.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Research and Researchers for Industries (RRI) Project, Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) Grant MSD61I0015 and TSRI Grant RSA6180023 (SS). Moreover, this research was partially supported by Chiang Mai University and with the collaboration of a research group of Modern Management and Information Technology, College of Arts, Media and Technology, and the Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. In addition, the authors would like to thank K Intanon, P Sirinual, T Kunthadech, and S Korpraphan for their contributions to the development of the games.

Abbreviations

PACES

Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale

UCD

user-centered design

Footnotes

Authors' Contributions: TK, SB, and SS share first authorships, conducted a major part of the methods and experimental design, developed the software, and contributed to the majority of the writing and reviewing of the manuscript. KP conducted a major part of the methods and experimental design, and commented on the manuscript and reviewed the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

  • 1.Osoba MY, Rao AK, Agrawal SK, Lalwani AK. Balance and gait in the elderly: a contemporary review. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019 Feb 04;4(1):143–153. doi: 10.1002/lio2.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Coutinho EDSF, Silva SDD. Uso de medicamentos como fator de risco para fratura grave decorrente de queda em idosos. Cad Saúde Pública. 2002 Oct;18(5):1359–1366. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2002000500029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schwartz AV, Nevitt MC, Brown Jr BW, Kelsey JL. Increased falling as a risk factor for fracture among older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Jan 15;161(2):180–185. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwi023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stevens JA, Corso PS, Finkelstein EA, Miller TR. The costs of fatal and non-fatal falls among older adults. Inj Prev. 2006 Oct 01;12(5):290–295. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.011015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Carlson JE, Ostir GV, Black SA, Markides KS, Rudkin L, Goodwin JS. Disability in older adults. 2: Physical activity as prevention. Behav Med. 2017 Jun 21;24(4):157–168. doi: 10.1080/08964289.1999.11879272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sherrington C, Whitney J, Lord S, Herbert R, Cumming R, Close J. Effective exercise for the prevention of falls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Dec 02;56(12):2234–2243. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02014.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sherrington C, Michaleff ZA, Fairhall N, Paul SS, Tiedemann A, Whitney J, Cumming RG, Herbert RD, Close JCT, Lord SR. Exercise to prevent falls in older adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Oct 04;51(24):1750–1758. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ejupi A, Gschwind YJ, Valenzuela T, Lord SR, Delbaere K. A Kinect and inertial sensor-based system for the self-assessment of fall risk: a home-based study in older people. Hum Comput Interact. 2015 Aug 25;31(3-4):261–293. doi: 10.1080/07370024.2015.1085309. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Li J, Erdt M, Chen L, Cao Y, Lee S, Theng Y. The social effects of exergames on older adults: systematic review and metric analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 28;20(6):e10486. doi: 10.2196/10486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Holtzer R, Friedman R, Lipton RB, Katz M, Xue X, Verghese J. The relationship between specific cognitive functions and falls in aging. Neuropsychology. 2007;21(5):540–548. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.5.540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liu-Ambrose T, Ahamed Y, Graf P, Feldman F, Robinovitch SN. Older fallers with poor working memory overestimate their postural limits. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jul;89(7):1335–1340. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Segev-Jacubovski O, Herman T, Yogev-Seligmann G, Mirelman A, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM. The interplay between gait, falls and cognition: can cognitive therapy reduce fall risk? Expert Rev Neurother. 2011 Jul 09;11(7):1057–75. doi: 10.1586/ern.11.69. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21721921 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martin K, Thomson R, Blizzard L, Wood A, Garry M, Srikanth V. Visuospatial ability and memory are associated with falls risk in older people. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;27(5):451–457. doi: 10.1159/000216840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Valenzuela M, Sachdev P. Harnessing brain and cognitive reserve for the prevention of dementia. Indian J Psychiatry. 2009 Jan;51 Suppl 1:S16–21. http://www.indianjpsychiatry.org/article.asp?issn=0019-5545;year=2009;volume=51;issue=5;spage=16;epage=21;aulast=Valenzuela . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.ten Brinke LF, Best JR, Crockett RA, Liu-Ambrose T. The effects of an 8-week computerized cognitive training program in older adults: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jan 30;18(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0730-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Smith-Ray RL, Hughes SL, Prohaska TR, Little DM, Jurivich DA, Hedeker D. Impact of cognitive training on balance and gait in older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Nov 05;70(3):357–366. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smith-Ray RL, Irmiter C, Boulter K. Cognitive training among cognitively impaired older adults: a feasibility study assessing the potential improvement in balance. Front Public Health. 2016 Oct 17;4:219:1–7. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Amboni M, Barone P, Hausdorff JM. Cognitive contributions to gait and falls: evidence and implications. Mov Disord. 2013 Sep 16;28(11):1520–1533. doi: 10.1002/mds.25674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Holtzer R, Friedman R, Lipton RB, Katz M, Xue X, Verghese J. The relationship between specific cognitive functions and falls in aging. Neuropsychology. 2007 Oct;21(5):540–548. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.5.540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Quigley A, MacKay-Lyons M, Eskes G. Effects of exercise on cognitive performance in older adults: a narrative review of the evidence, possible biological mechanisms, and recommendations for exercise prescription. J Aging Res. 2020 May 14;2020:1–15. doi: 10.1155/2020/1407896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fabre C, Chamari K, Mucci P, Massé-Biron J, Préfaut C. Improvement of cognitive function by mental and/or individualized aerobic training in healthy elderly subjects. Int J Sports Med. 2002 Aug;23(6):415–421. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-33735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Silsupadol P, Shumway-Cook A, Lugade V, van Donkelaar P, Chou L, Mayr U, Woollacott MH. Effects of single-task versus dual-task training on balance performance in older adults: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Mar;90(3):381–387. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Theill N, Schumacher V, Adelsberger R, Martin M, Jäncke Lutz. Effects of simultaneously performed cognitive and physical training in older adults. BMC Neurosci. 2013 Sep 23;14:103–14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-103. https://bmcneurosci.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2202-14-103 .1471-2202-14-103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Quigley A, MacKay-Lyons M, Eskes G. Effects of exercise on cognitive performance in older adults: a narrative review of the evidence, possible biological mechanisms, and recommendations for exercise prescription. J Aging Res. 2020;2020:1407896. doi: 10.1155/2020/1407896. doi: 10.1155/2020/1407896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.de Bruin ED, Schoene D, Pichierri G, Smith ST. Use of virtual reality technique for the training of motor control in the elderly. Some theoretical considerations. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2010 Aug;43(4):229–234. doi: 10.1007/s00391-010-0124-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Oh Y, Yang S. Meaningful Play 2010; October 21-23, 2010; East Lansing, MI. 2010. Oct 21, pp. 1–17. https://meaningfulplay.msu.edu/proceedings2010/mp2010_paper_63.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lange B, Flynn S, Proffitt R, Chang C, Rizzo Albert Skip. Development of an interactive game-based rehabilitation tool for dynamic balance training. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;17(5):345–52. doi: 10.1310/tsr1705-345.3R2237HX21302105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hoffmann K, Sportwiss D, Hardy S, Wiemeyer J, Göbel S. Personalized adaptive control of training load in cardio-exergames—a feasibility study. Games Health J. 2015 Dec;4(6):470–479. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2014.0073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pirovano M, Surer E, Mainetti R, Lanzi PL, Alberto Borghese N. Exergaming and rehabilitation: a methodology for the design of effective and safe therapeutic exergames. Entertain Comput. 2016 May;14:55–65. doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2015.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Deutsch JE, Brettler A, Smith C, Welsh J, John R, Guarrera-Bowlby P, Kafri M. Nintendo wii sports and wii fit game analysis, validation, and application to stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(6):701–19. doi: 10.1310/tsr1806-701.N53686254623G619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.van Diest M, Lamoth CJ, Stegenga J, Verkerke GJ, Postema K. Exergaming for balance training of elderly: state of the art and future developments. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Sep 25;10:101. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-101. https://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-0003-10-101 .1743-0003-10-101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Skjæret N, Nawaz A, Morat T, Schoene D, Helbostad JL, Vereijken B. Exercise and rehabilitation delivered through exergames in older adults: an integrative review of technologies, safety and efficacy. Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jan;85(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.10.008.S1386-5056(15)30051-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Adcock M, Sonder F, Schättin A, Gennaro F, de Bruin ED. A usability study of a multicomponent video game-based training for older adults. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2020 Jan 11;17:3:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s11556-019-0233-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Laver K, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2012 Feb 15;43(2):20–21. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.111.642439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chan CLF, Ngai EKY, Leung PKH, Wong S. Effect of the adapted Virtual Reality cognitive training program among Chinese older adults with chronic schizophrenia: a pilot study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;25(6):643–649. doi: 10.1002/gps.2403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Maillot P, Perrot A, Hartley A. Effects of interactive physical-activity video-game training on physical and cognitive function in older adults. Psychol Aging. 2012 Sep;27(3):589–600. doi: 10.1037/a0026268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Bieryla KA, Dold NM. Feasibility of Wii Fit training to improve clinical measures of balance in older adults. Clin Interv Aging. 2013 Jun;8:775–781. doi: 10.2147/cia.s46164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fu AS, Gao KL, Tung AK, Tsang WW, Kwan MM. Effectiveness of exergaming training in reducing risk and incidence of falls in frail older adults with a history of falls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Dec;96(12):2096–2102. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Park E, Kim S, Lee C. The effects of virtual reality game exercise on balance and gait of the elderly. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Apr;27(4):1157–1159. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fang Q, Ghanouni P, Anderson SE, Touchett H, Shirley R, Fang F, Fang C. Effects of exergaming on balance of healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Games Health J. 2020 Feb;9(1):11–23. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2019.0016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mansor NS, Chow CM, Halaki M. Cognitive effects of video games in older adults and their moderators: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. Aging Ment Health. 2019 Feb 20;24(6):841–856. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1574710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Klompstra LV, Jaarsma T, Strömberg A. Exergaming in older adults: a scoping review and implementation potential for patients with heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Oct 01;13(5):388–398. doi: 10.1177/1474515113512203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yeung LF, Yang Z, Cheng KC, Du D, Tong RK. Effects of camera viewing angles on tracking kinematic gait patterns using Azure Kinect, Kinect v2 and Orbbec Astra Pro v2. Gait Posture. 2021 Jun;87:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sápi M, Fehér-Kiss A, Csernák K, Domján A, Pintér S. The effects of exergaming on sensory reweighting and mediolateral stability of women aged over 60: usability study. JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Jul 21;9(3):e27884. doi: 10.2196/preprints.27884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang Z. Microsoft Kinect Sensor and Its Effect. IEEE Multimedia. 2012 Feb 27;19(2):4–10. doi: 10.1109/mmul.2012.24. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lange B, Chang C, Suma E, Newman B, Rizzo AS, Bolas M. Development and evaluation of low cost game-based balance rehabilitation tool using the Microsoft Kinect sensor. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:1831–1834. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yang CM, Hsieh JS, Chen YC, Yang SY, Lin HC. Effects of Kinect exergames on balance training among community older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine. 2020 Jul 10;99(28):e21228. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000021228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yu TC, Chiang CH, Wu PT, Wu WL, Chu IH. Effects of exergames on physical fitness in middle-aged and older adults in Taiwan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 08;17(7):2565. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Adcock M, Fankhauser M, Post J, Lutz K, Zizlsperger L, Luft AR, Guimarães V, Schättin A, de Bruin ED. Effects of an in-home multicomponent exergame training on physical functions, cognition, and brain volume of older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Front Med. 2020 Jan 28;6:321. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liao YY, Chen IH, Wang RY. Effects of Kinect-based exergaming on frailty status and physical performance in prefrail and frail elderly: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 27;9(1):9353. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45767-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhao Y, Feng H, Wu X, Du Y, Yang X, Hu M, Ning H, Liao L, Chen H, Zhao Y. Effectiveness of exergaming in improving cognitive and physical function in people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: systematic review. JMIR Serious Games. 2020 Jun 30;8(2):e16841. doi: 10.2196/16841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hanson VL. Influencing technology adoption by older adults. Interact Comput. 2010 Nov;22(6):502–509. doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hemingway C, Baja ES, Dalmacion GV, Medina PMB, Guevara EG, Sy TR, Dacombe R, Dormann C, Taegtmeyer M. Development of a mobile game to influence behavior determinants of HIV service uptake among key populations in the Philippines: user-centered design process. JMIR Serious Games. 2019 Dec 20;7(4):e13695. doi: 10.2196/13695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pagulayan R, Keeker K, Wixon D, Romero R, Fuller T. User-centered design in games. In: Jacko J, Sears A, editors. Handbook for Human-Computer Interaction in Interactive Systems. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc; 2003. pp. 883–906. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fullerton T, Swain C, Hoffman S. Designing, Prototyping and Playtesting Games. San Francisco, CA: CMP Books; 2004. Jan, Game design workshop. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Salen K, Tekinba K, Zimmerman E. Game Design Fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004. Rules of play. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H, Benyon D, Holland S, Carey T. Human-Computer Interaction. Edinburgh Gate Harlow, UK: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd; 1994. Oct 01, pp. 82–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Carroll JM. Encountering others: reciprocal openings in participatory design and user-centered design. Hum Comput Interact. 2009 Nov 11;11(3):285–290. doi: 10.1207/s15327051hci1103_5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Schättin A, Häfliger S, Meyer A, Früh B, Böckler S, Hungerbühler Y, de Bruin ED, Frese S, Steinlin Egli R, Götz U, Bauer R, Martin-Niedecken AL. Design and evaluation of user-centered exergames for patients with multiple sclerosis: multilevel usability and feasibility studies. JMIR Serious Games. 2021 May 7;9(2):e22826. doi: 10.2196/22826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chu CH, Biss RK, Cooper L, Quan AML, Matulis H. Exergaming platform for older adults residing in long-term care homes: user-centered design, development, and usability study. JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Mar 9;9(1):e22370. doi: 10.2196/22370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Harte R, Glynn L, Rodríguez-Molinero A, Baker PM, Scharf T, Quinlan LR, ÓLaighin G. A human-centered design methodology to enhance the usability, human factors, and user experience of connected health systems: a three-phase methodology. JMIR Hum Factors. 2017 Mar 16;4(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/humanfactors.5443. http://humanfactors.jmir.org/2017/1/e8/ v4i1e8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ergonomics of human-system interaction. Human-centred design for interactive systems. British Standards Institution. 2010. [2021-08-20]. [DOI]
  • 63.Lord S, Tiedemann A, Chapman K, Munro B, Murray S, Gerontology M, Ther G, Sherrington C. The effect of an individualized fall prevention program on fall risk and falls in older people: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Aug;53(8):1296–1304. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53425.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Choi SD, Guo L, Kang D, Xiong S. Exergame technology and interactive interventions for elderly fall prevention: a systematic literature review. Appl Ergon. 2017 Nov;65:570–581. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.10.013.S0003-6870(16)30226-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lipardo DS, Aseron AMC, Kwan MM, Tsang WW. Effect of exercise and cognitive training on falls and fall-related factors in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Oct;98(10):2079–2096. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Montero-Odasso M, Oteng-Amoako A, Speechley M, Gopaul K, Beauchet O, Annweiler C, Muir-Hunter SW. The motor signature of mild cognitive impairment: results from the gait and brain study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 Sep 02;69(11):1415–1421. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Zhang W, Low LF, Schwenk M, Mills N, Gwynn JD, Clemson L. Review of gait, cognition, and fall risks with implications for fall prevention in older adults with dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019 Nov 19;48(1-2):17–29. doi: 10.1159/000504340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.van Someren MW, Barnard YF, Sandberg JAC. The think aloud method: a practical approach to modelling cognitive processes. London, United Kingdom: Academic Press; 1994. [2021-08-18]. http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/library/vanSomeren_94_think_aloud_method.pdf . [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kendzierski D, DeCarlo K. Physical activity enjoyment scale: two validation studies. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1991 Mar;13(1):50–64. doi: 10.1123/jsep.13.1.50. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mullen SP, Olson EA, Phillips SM, Szabo AN, Wójcicki TR, Mailey EL, Gothe NP, Fanning JT, Kramer AF, McAuley E. Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in older adults: invariance of the physical activity enjoyment scale (paces) across groups and time. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011 Sep 27;27(8:103):1–9. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Boongird P. Mental state examination T10. Webpage in Thai. Dementia Association of Thailand. 2018. [2021-08-11]. http://www.wongpakaran.com/images/sub_1550692605/MSET10_GPsy_8Mar2021.pdf .
  • 72.Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Van Reekum R. The use of GDS-15 in detecting MDD: a comparison between residents in a Thai long-term care home and geriatric outpatients. J Clin Med Res. 2013 Apr;5(2):101–111. doi: 10.4021/jocmr1239w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Kinect for Windows Human Interface Guidelines v2.0. Microsoft Corporation. 2014. [2021-08-18]. http://download.microsoft.com/download/6/7/6/676611b4-1982-47a4-a42e-4cf84e1095a8/kinecthig.2.0.pdf .
  • 74.Gonzalez-Jorge H, Rodríguez-Gonzálvez P, Martínez-Sánchez J, González-Aguilera D, Arias P, Gesto M, Díaz-Vilariño L. Metrological comparison between Kinect I and Kinect II sensors. Measurement. 2015 Jun;70:21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.03.042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.American College of Sports Medicine . ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. In: Riebe D, Ehrman JK, Liguori G, Magal M, editors. American College of Sports Medicine Series. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2016. Dec 13, [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries NK, Brug J, Oenema A. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 6;13(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1639. http://www.jmir.org/2011/1/e2/ v13i1e2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Nyman SR, Victor CR. Older people's recruitment, sustained participation, and adherence to falls prevention interventions in institutional settings: a supplement to the Cochrane systematic review. Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):430–436. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Davies CA, Spence JC, Vandelanotte C, Caperchione CM, Mummery WK. Meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Apr 30;9:52. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-52. http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/9//52 .1479-5868-9-52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Howes SC, Charles D, Pedlow K, Wilson I, Holmes D, McDonough S. User-centred design of an active computer gaming system for strength and balance exercises for older adults. J Enabling Technol. 2019 Apr 16;13(2):101–111. doi: 10.1108/jet-12-2018-0057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Okubo Y, Schoene D, Lord SR. Step training improves reaction time, gait and balance and reduces falls in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Apr;51(7):586–593. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Nawaz A, Skjæret N, Ystmark K, Helbostad J, Vereijken B, Svanæs D. Assessing seniors' user experience (UX) of exergames for balance training. Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction; 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction; October 26-30, 2014; Helsinki, Finland. 2014. Oct 26, pp. 578–587. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Tabak M, Weering MDV, van Dijk H, Vollenbroek-Hutten M. Promoting daily physical activity by means of mobile gaming: a review of the state of the art. Games Health J. 2015 Dec;4(6):460–469. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2015.0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Lewis ZH, Swartz MC, Lyons EJ. What's the point?: a review of reward systems implemented in gamification interventions. Games for Health Journal. 2016 Apr;5(2):93–99. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2015.0078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Da Silva Júnior JLA, Biduski D, Bellei EA, Becker OHC, Daroit L, Pasqualotti A, Filho HT, De Marchi ACB. A bowling exergame to improve functional capacity in older adults: co-design, development, and testing to compare the progress of playing alone versus playing with peers. JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Jan 29;9(1):e23423. doi: 10.2196/23423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lu MH, Lin W, Yueh HP. Development and evaluation of a cognitive training game for older people: a design-based approach. Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 17;8:1837. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JMIR Serious Games are provided here courtesy of JMIR Publications Inc.

RESOURCES