Abstract
The occupation of a worker is a determining factor of sickness absence (SA) and can influence both the beginning and continuation of the latter. This study describes SA in Spain, separately in the different Autonomous Communities (AC) in relation to the occupation of workers, with the aim of determining the possible differences in its frequency and duration, relating it also to the diagnosis. A total of 6,543,307 workers, aged 16 years and older, who had at least one episode of SA in the year 2019, constituted the study sample. The obtained results indicate that SA is more frequent and shorter in more elemental occupations. The average duration increases with age and is longer in women, except in technical and administrative occupations, where there is no gender divide. Sickness absences caused by musculoskeletal and mental disorders are more frequent in the lower occupational classes, although their average duration is shorter than in other, more qualified groups. The ACs with shorter duration in almost all the occupational groups are Madrid, Navarre and the Basque Country. In conclusion, SA is more frequent and shorter in lower occupational classes.
Keywords: sickness absence, occupation health, occupational class, Autonomous Community
1. Introduction
In Spain, sickness absence (SA) is defined as that situation in which a worker cannot perform his/her job due to illness or injury and receives financial aid from the Social Security system [1].
The maximum duration of this financial aid is one year, which can be extended up to 6 months if it can be predicted that the worker may improve his/her health state in that period and go back to work. In order to be entitled to this benefit, in case of common disease, the worker must have contributed a minimum of 180 days in the previous 5 years at the beginning of the SA. In the case of professional illness or accident, whether occupational or not, no previous contribution period is required [1].
This situation affects both the workers who carry out their job as employees and those workers who work for themselves, i.e., self-employed workers or business owners.
The recognition of SA requires a medical certificate, generally from a doctor of the National Health System in the case of common eventualities, or a doctor of one of the Insurance Companies Linked to the Social Security System in the case of professional eventualities. These doctors are also in charge of issuing certificates for the worker if the latter continues to be sick or injured, declaring that he/she cannot go back to work, until he/she improves to the point that he/she can resume his/her working activity. In some cases, the consequences of the disease or accident are so severe that the worker can be permanently unable to perform his/her job or any job in general; this recognition is done by the Disability Assessment Team, which proposes a permanent disability to the National Institute of Social Security (INSS) [2,3].
Like most European countries, Spain’s public sickness insurance spending is a major component of its social security system. The total financial cost of SA in consolidated Social Security budgets for 2019 in Spain reached 11,554,711.16 €, which is 8.89% of the general Social Security budget [4]. Besides, the importance of SA caused by disease or accident is not only determined by the social and financial costs that each State dedicates to it, but also by the resources that employers assign to it, as well as the productivity losses and the deterioration of these workers’ health. It has been reported that work absenteeism due to illness is, in itself, a risk factor for falling sick, new periods of SA, unemployment, permanent disability pension, social exclusion and death [5,6,7,8]. Long SA periods generate both an early retirement from the job market, a slower salary increase and an impoverishment of household wealth [9].
Knowledge of the determinants of sickness absence and of the accumulation of sickness absence days is important to be able to target effective measures that aim to prevent both incidence and prolongation of sickness absence and to curb its harmful consequences [10].
Both at the beginning and continuation (i.e., duration) of this situation, there are multiple influencing factors, especially those related to the health-disease binomial, as well as individual, job and socioeconomic factors [11].
Socioeconomic factors are of great relevance regarding SA, since their influence on the health of workers has been demonstrated in numerous studies throughout history [11,12,13].
Among the socioeconomic factors, the more important ones in relation to SA are job hierarchy or occupational class, education level, income, unemployment and other economic aspects [12,14,15].
In all countries, it is stated that SA is higher in the lower occupational classes, that is, those in which workers have a greater physical load and less intellectual responsibility [16]. However, studies indicate that this fact occurs in all occupational classes and remains throughout the years, affecting both men and women. This is also observed in non-manual workers whose activity is carried out in a low occupational class, with great physical and mental demands, as in the case of nurses [17].
Regarding the above mentioned, some studies have reported an association between the occupational class and the duration of SA. It has been observed that, in blue collar workers, SA is shorter and more frequently caused by musculoskeletal problems than in white collar workers. However, when a white collar worker initiates a SA by musculoskeletal cause, it is usually a long SA (longer than 6 months), more frequently associated with mental problems, and with the worker being more likely to be permanently disabled [18]. The authors justify this assertion by considering that, when white collar workers initiate a SA by musculoskeletal cause, this disease is usually more severe and, since many cases are associated with psychic problems, the prognosis worsens, and the duration of the SA and the probability of developing a permanent disability increase.
The studies conducted by Pekkala et al. are also along these lines, indicating that SA is much more frequent in the lower occupational classes, in both men and women [17].
This has been recently corroborated by Blomgren and Jäppinen (2021), who included all occupational classes (employees, business owners or self-employed workers, and unemployed individuals). That is, SA is more frequent in the lower manual occupational classes, regardless of whether they are self-employed workers or employees. In the study mentioned, SA from musculoskeletal problems was similar in the group of employees than in the group of self-employed workers. However, SA by mental problems was more frequent in employees than in business owners. Unemployed individuals also showed a greater SA rate and duration than expected for mental health problems. This seems to be due to the fact that the lower occupational classes have worse physical working conditions and greater psychosocial risks, as they are under more compulsion and have a lower decision-making capacity in their job position. In the group of business owners, the authors of the mentioned study state that both men and women have better mental health due to the natural selection of healthier and psychologically stronger people to occupy these positions, along with the positive influence of their high decision-making capacity and autonomy in their job position [10].
Other studies, such as that of Piha et al., attempted to find a correlation between several socioeconomic factors, mainly education, occupational class, income and SA. These authors found that higher education levels, occupation classes and income were strongly related to a lower SA rate. Controlling for these three variables, education level and occupational class showed stronger correlations with low levels of SA compared to income [19].
Spain is divided into 19 Autonomous Communities. In each region there are significant differences in education, economic situation, unemployment rate and public health system. By sex, the percentage of men and women is balanced. The number of women is slightly higher, although the number of working men remains higher. By age, the regions with the youngest population are those on the Mediterranean coast and also Castile La Mancha, Extremadura and the Community of Madrid. The northwestern regions are more aged. The regions with the highest rates of active population were the Canary Islands, the Balearic Islands, the Community of Madrid and Catalonia and those with the lowest rates were the Cantabrian, Western and Central regions. The service sector contained the majority of the work-force (76%) in the islands, the Community of Madrid and Andalusia. Industry was the predominant sector in Navarre, the Basque Country and La Rioja; construction in Castile La Mancha; and agriculture and farming in Murcia [20].
A descriptive study of SA was conducted in Spain in 2018, and also by Autonomous Community (AC), although SA was not analysed as a function of the worker’s occupation [4]. The authors concluded that further research was necessary due to the differences found in SA in the different ACs regarding age, gender, whether the worker was employed or self-employed, the cause of the sick leave (work-related or non-work-related SA) and the relationship with the activity in the company.
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyze the differences in SA in terms of occupational class, according to the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-08) [21], focusing on the different regions of the country and according to the main characteristics of SA and differences between AC. Thanks to this study, new measures could be introduced to improve workplaces, workers could take up their jobs sooner, SA benefits could be managed more efficiently in AC, and the negative consequences of SA could be reduced.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Participants
A population study was carried out using the databases of the INSS (https://www.seg-social.es/wps/portal/wss/internet/EstadisticasPresupuestosEstudios/Estadisticas/EST45/EST46 (accessed on 25 February 2021)) and the Spanish Statistics Institute (INE) (https://www.ine.es (accessed on 25 February 2021)) including 6,543,307 SA processes (all regimes, including self-employed workers) from the year 2019.
This is an observational study. The statistical calculations used to refer to all the people affiliated with the system who are entitled to receive the SA benefit, calculated according to the data provided by the Public Employment Service, the General Treasury of Social Security, INSS and the Social Institute of the Navy.
The study population was constituted by workers aged 16 years and older who contributed to the Social Security system, excluding civil workers of the State Civil Servant Mutual Society, the General Judicial Mutual Society and the Armed Forces, since their SA management and control system is different from that of the rest of workers.
We analysed a total of 6,543,307 SA processes (all regimes, including self-employed workers) from the year 2019, of whom 5,814,494 had a SA process for common eventualities and 728,813 for professional eventualities; all these SA processes were extracted from the databases of the Social Security system. Of the total sample, 685,752 cases corresponded to the databases of the Medical Units of the INSS (583,118 employees and 102,624 self-employed workers), who were those who underwent a medical inspection check.
The unit of analysis was the Spanish Autonomous Community.
The dependent variable is workers who have started and/or finished a period of SA in 2019.
The independent variables were:
Age: workers aged between 16 and 65 years and older, divided into age ranges: 16–25, 26–35, 36–45, 46–55, 56–65 and >65 years.
Gender: men and women contributing to the Social Security system.
Occupational level: based on the International Standard Classification of Occupations (ISCO-08), developed by the International Labor Organization [21]. Armed forces occupations (Group 10) were excluded, since the SA in these workers is not managed or controlled by the Public Health Service or the INSS. For this study, we used the ISCO in level 1 aggregation, that is, the one that includes the large occupational groups (Group 1 to Group 9).
Diagnostic episode of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), which has been active since January 2016 in Spain.
2.2. Measurement of Sickness Absence
The indicators used regarding SA were:
SA rate: number of workers in SA per 1000 affiliated workers, according to gender, age ranges, AC, occupational level and activity of the company.
Average duration: refers to the duration, in days, of the SA processes that ended in 2019. It was calculated by dividing the total number of days in SA of those processes that started and/or finished a period of SA in 2019 (regardless of its end date) by the total number of SA processes.
Number of SA cases in 2019: means the number of SA processes analysed in the INSS Medical Units in 2019. It shows the SA frequency.
2.3. Statistical Methods
The outcomes of the study were the SA rates, i.e., number of SA cases of average duration SA episode in the study population during 2019. Since both incidence and length of sickness absence are different among men and women, and there are clear differences in the association of occupational class with sickness absence by gender [10], the analyses were performed separately for men and women and also by age.
Descriptive statistics were obtained for all variables on the number of SA cases and the number of absence days for each AC.
Due to the importance of long-term SA, a descriptive study was performed to analyze the following parameters related to SA average duration: central tendency measures (average, median and mode), dispersion measures (standard deviation, variance of the sample and range) and position measures (kurtosis and skewness), with a confidence interval of 95% of the average. For the processing of the data, we used the descriptive statistical program of Excel® 2010 (Microsoft office Excel 2010, USA).
3. Results
The total sample analysed constituted 6,543,307 workers in SA from the year 2019, distributed in the different ACs of Spain. The reason for selecting 2019 over 2020 is that the latter was an atypical year due to the coronavirus pandemic.
The data of some ACs must be interpreted with caution, since there is a high per-centage of cases in which the profession of the worker was not documented, as is the case of Aragon (90%), Extremadura (26%), Navarre (94%) and the Basque Country (90%). In the rest of the ACs, the percentage of non-informed occupations ranges between 3% and 6%, thus these data are more reliable. Despite this limitation, the coverage of this study overcomes this issue.
The results of the descriptive analysis according to ISCO-08 in relation to SA duration in the different ACs are available online (Table S1). The data are highly scattered in all occupations, with “Professional” showing the most homogeneous mean durations in all ACs. The group “Managers” shows the longest mean duration (n = 69.17) and the group “Professional” presents the shortest mean duration (n = 41.96). Moreover, the group “Managers” shows the highest range of variation between mean durations (n = 66.69).
As is shown in Table 1, the groups “Elementary occupations”, “Craft and related trades workers” and “Clerical support workers” present the highest SA rates in almost all the ACs. On the other hand, the group “Managers” show the lowest SA rates.
Table 1.
Managers | Professional | Technicians and Associate Professionals | Clerical Support Workers | Services and Sales Workers | Skilled Agricultural, Forestry and Fishery Workers | Craft and Related Trade Workers | Plant and Machine Operators and Assemblers | Elementary Occupations | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Andalusia | 10.40 | 15.04 | 27.09 | 28.34 | 24.09 | 15.35 | 25.05 | 23.11 | 30.17 |
Aragon | 0.48 | 0.60 | 1.29 | 0.89 | 2.39 | 1.21 | 6.48 | 3.18 | 6.59 |
Asturias | 10.70 | 13.27 | 17.39 | 24.79 | 22.42 | 11.64 | 25.91 | 26.36 | 32.68 |
Balearic Islands | 7.29 | 17.02 | 19.30 | 25.70 | 32.06 | 9.64 | 22.51 | 22.45 | 42.01 |
Canary Islands | 8.18 | 24.55 | 24.76 | 31.69 | 28.76 | 14.80 | 26.73 | 23.94 | 34.79 |
Cantabria | 9.51 | 22.21 | 17.70 | 30.64 | 23.12 | 14.57 | 27.64 | 25.11 | 30.09 |
Castile and Leon | 12.11 | 11.92 | 18.72 | 22.03 | 18.46 | 6.56 | 29.49 | 20.86 | 33.22 |
Castile La Mancha | 9.38 | 12.40 | 16.13 | 26.02 | 19.32 | 6.37 | 24.41 | 19.46 | 36.12 |
Catalonia | 11.86 | 27.41 | 35.77 | 49.62 | 48.11 | 27.34 | 41.33 | 34.60 | 59.60 |
Extremadura | 9.92 | 14.99 | 9.28 | 23.02 | 17.89 | 11.06 | 15.34 | 16.58 | 22.13 |
Galicia | 12.43 | 13.73 | 16.63 | 18.17 | 20.91 | 8.15 | 32.09 | 17.59 | 30.70 |
Madrid | 14.94 | 18.97 | 18.09 | 55.08 | 34.85 | 54.78 | 31.34 | 43.50 | 41.56 |
Murcia | 15.83 | 17.59 | 23.14 | 25.86 | 28.54 | 17.59 | 31.53 | 21.37 | 26.24 |
Navarre | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.89 | 0.42 | 1.86 | 0.72 | 7.60 | 3.77 | 5.62 |
La Rioja | 10.29 | 16.29 | 19.99 | 23.87 | 24.45 | 12.95 | 56.00 | 21.48 | 33.83 |
Valencia | 10.93 | 13.47 | 20.69 | 15.67 | 18.02 | 12.65 | 27.69 | 17.39 | 25.11 |
Basquet Country | 0.51 | 0.69 | 1.50 | 0.72 | 2.98 | 2.36 | 9.29 | 3.98 | 8.79 |
Ceuta | 17.65 | 15.42 | 12.40 | 32.37 | 18.04 | 10.83 | 32.34 | 15.24 | 37.20 |
Melilla | 7.23 | 16.88 | 29.52 | 28.74 | 22.84 | 11.00 | 27.96 | 35.48 | 42.09 |
Besides, the high SA rates in Catalonia are noteworthy, particularly in the groups “Clerical support workers” (n = 49.62), “Services or sales workers” (n = 48.11) and “Elementary occupations” (n = 59.60). La Rioja also stands out in the group “Craft and related trades workers” (n = 56) and Madrid, in the groups “Clerical support workers” (n = 55.08) and “Skilled, agricultural forestry and fishery workers” (n = 54.78).
Table 2 gathers the mean durations (average number of days) by gender and ISCO. The longest duration corresponds to women of the group “Skilled agricultural, forestry and fishery workers” and men of the group “Managers” in almost all ACs, although there is great variability between ACs.
Table 2.
Managers | Professional | Technicians and Associate Professionals |
Clerical Support Workers |
Services and Sales Workers | Skilled Agricultural, Forestry and Fishery Workers |
Craft and Related Trades Workers | Plant and Machine Operators, and Assemblers |
Elementary Occupations |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Man | Woman | Man | Woman | Man | Woman | Man | Woman | Man | Woman | Man | Woman | Man | Woman | Man | Woman | Man | Woman | |
Andalusia | 80 | 68 | 44 | 42 | 45 | 45 | 38 | 38 | 48 | 47 | 75 | 92 | 45 | 51 | 50 | 54 | 51 | 69 |
Aragon | 38 | 36 | 40 | 48 | 37 | 45 | 37 | 46 | 37 | 37 | 40 | 34 | 35 | 33 | 40 | 38 | 32 | 37 |
Asturias | 99 | 84 | 53 | 48 | 61 | 57 | 61 | 52 | 67 | 63 | 107 | 143 | 61 | 72 | 71 | 75 | 54 | 90 |
Balearic Islands | 68 | 60 | 36 | 35 | 32 | 31 | 32 | 31 | 34 | 35 | 39 | 65 | 35 | 42 | 39 | 47 | 30 | 51 |
Canary Islands | 82 | 67 | 35 | 34 | 44 | 43 | 41 | 43 | 44 | 43 | 60 | 61 | 44 | 50 | 53 | 62 | 40 | 58 |
Cantabria | 83 | 71 | 39 | 38 | 53 | 50 | 31 | 41 | 59 | 57 | 115 | 154 | 54 | 66 | 59 | 61 | 49 | 81 |
Castile and Leon | 87 | 86 | 54 | 57 | 52 | 55 | 40 | 44 | 62 | 64 | 93 | 134 | 47 | 51 | 50 | 52 | 47 | 76 |
Castile La Mancha | 73 | 65 | 44 | 54 | 39 | 47 | 29 | 38 | 46 | 51 | 64 | 68 | 39 | 48 | 40 | 41 | 39 | 52 |
Catalonia | 55 | 44 | 24 | 27 | 26 | 27 | 21 | 25 | 30 | 33 | 41 | 49 | 31 | 36 | 34 | 36 | 29 | 47 |
Extremadura | 86 | 91 | 52 | 59 | 46 | 59 | 52 | 54 | 59 | 65 | 76 | 104 | 48 | 69 | 51 | 55 | 52 | 68 |
Galicia | 105 | 95 | 54 | 55 | 63 | 66 | 57 | 60 | 67 | 72 | 119 | 181 | 63 | 78 | 74 | 85 | 64 | 109 |
Madrid | 44 | 39 | 26 | 28 | 25 | 28 | 23 | 25 | 29 | 28 | 30 | 33 | 29 | 31 | 28 | 28 | 24 | 38 |
Murcia | 86 | 92 | 42 | 43 | 46 | 52 | 43 | 44 | 52 | 54 | 76 | 102 | 44 | 69 | 51 | 63 | 51 | 74 |
Navarre | 42 | 25 | 45 | 23 | 29 | 40 | 42 | 35 | 33 | 32 | 22 | 24 | 28 | 34 | 25 | 32 | 31 | 44 |
La Rioja | 66 | 50 | 28 | 34 | 37 | 43 | 36 | 36 | 44 | 45 | 43 | 55 | 34 | 34 | 35 | 32 | 37 | 55 |
Valencia | 83 | 81 | 49 | 51 | 48 | 50 | 38 | 45 | 54 | 54 | 62 | 80 | 45 | 54 | 45 | 53 | 46 | 71 |
Basque Country | 34 | 41 | 39 | 40 | 37 | 43 | 32 | 39 | 31 | 34 | 32 | 33 | 29 | 35 | 31 | 38 | 31 | 40 |
Ceuta | 72 | 49 | 43 | 43 | 54 | 51 | 56 | 44 | 46 | 47 | 54 | 18 | 47 | 62 | 61 | 62 | 49 | 55 |
Melilla | 110 | 90 | 52 | 37 | 57 | 37 | 53 | 47 | 51 | 45 | 37 | 42 | 57 | 28 | 64 | 51 | 40 | 55 |
In many occupational groups, there are very few differences in the mean duration of SA between men and women, as is the case of the group “Technicians and associate professionals” in Andalusia, “Service and sales workers” in Asturias, “Clerical support workers” in Andalusia, “Service and sales workers” in Aragon and Balearic Islands, and “Plant and machine operators, and assemblers” in Madrid.
The greatest difference in SA duration by gender in almost all CAs corresponds to the group “Elementary occupations”, with a much longer mean duration in women, as is the case in Galicia (men: 64 days; women: 109 days), Asturias (men: 54 days; women: 90 days) and Castile and Leon (men: 47 days; women: 76 days).
The ACs with lower gender differences in mean SA duration by occupational group are Madrid, Navarre and the Basque Country, which, in addition, are among the ACs with the shortest duration in all levels (ISCO-08).
As can be observed, the mean durations of all the occupations increase with the age of the worker in all ACs, as is shown in Table 3, except in the group “Elementary occupations”, where the mean duration of SA in people aged over 65 years is shorter than in younger age ranges.
Table 3.
Managers | Professional | Technicians and Associate Professionals |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16–25 | 26–35 | 36–45 | 46–55 | 56–65 | >65 | 16–25 | 26–35 | 36–45 | 46–55 | 56–65 | >65 | 16–25 | 26–35 | 36–45 | 46–55 | 56–65 | >65 | |
Andalusia | 36 | 48 | 57 | 82 | 109 | 144 | 18 | 30 | 38 | 50 | 61 | 88 | 21 | 30 | 40 | 54 | 76 | 102 |
Aragon | 45 | 24 | 24 | 83 | 41 | 35 | 41 | 52 | 59 | 1 | 35 | 35 | 38 | 44 | 48 | 30 | ||
Asturias | 43 | 54 | 69 | 96 | 118 | 114 | 21 | 32 | 43 | 60 | 66 | 80 | 28 | 35 | 53 | 71 | 94 | 111 |
Balearic Islands | 27 | 36 | 46 | 65 | 107 | 153 | 16 | 25 | 32 | 43 | 57 | 57 | 11 | 19 | 30 | 43 | 65 | 63 |
Canary Islands | 38 | 47 | 62 | 75 | 109 | 150 | 15 | 25 | 34 | 38 | 46 | 64 | 22 | 34 | 41 | 53 | 62 | 102 |
Cantabria | 70 | 38 | 53 | 91 | 109 | 87 | 11 | 26 | 35 | 46 | 55 | 72 | 23 | 34 | 46 | 60 | 87 | 150 |
Castile and Leon | 53 | 53 | 65 | 88 | 117 | 137 | 20 | 41 | 52 | 63 | 75 | 79 | 24 | 35 | 48 | 63 | 85 | 101 |
Castile La Mancha | 52 | 45 | 55 | 76 | 100 | 123 | 18 | 41 | 49 | 61 | 67 | 83 | 22 | 30 | 40 | 53 | 66 | 110 |
Catalonia | 14 | 26 | 38 | 56 | 81 | 138 | 11 | 19 | 25 | 33 | 45 | 56 | 11 | 18 | 25 | 35 | 53 | 86 |
Extremadura | 53 | 77 | 73 | 86 | 111 | 142 | 35 | 47 | 58 | 61 | 63 | 59 | 37 | 42 | 49 | 59 | 65 | 18 |
Galicia | 43 | 65 | 81 | 106 | 133 | 162 | 25 | 40 | 53 | 63 | 68 | 66 | 31 | 44 | 59 | 77 | 92 | 127 |
Madrid | 16 | 28 | 36 | 45 | 59 | 86 | 11 | 22 | 28 | 32 | 37 | 50 | 13 | 20 | 26 | 33 | 43 | 63 |
Murcia | 45 | 58 | 71 | 90 | 119 | 184 | 19 | 33 | 39 | 48 | 58 | 44 | 23 | 31 | 45 | 59 | 82 | 106 |
Navarre | 8 | 6 | 22 | 41 | 76 | 14 | 22 | 32 | 36 | 58 | 31 | 28 | 30 | 24 | 57 | 230 | ||
La Rioja | 18 | 34 | 35 | 56 | 103 | 144 | 19 | 24 | 32 | 37 | 42 | 67 | 21 | 26 | 39 | 48 | 62 | 115 |
Valencia | 40 | 56 | 67 | 89 | 108 | 136 | 21 | 38 | 48 | 56 | 70 | 74 | 25 | 34 | 44 | 57 | 77 | 126 |
Basque Country | 30 | 21 | 33 | 35 | 55 | 38 | 40 | 33 | 40 | 43 | 45 | 59 | 47 | 37 | 30 | 43 | 47 | 26 |
Ceuta | 69 | 33 | 26 | 66 | 85 | 93 | 37 | 34 | 37 | 47 | 56 | 22 | 16 | 45 | 50 | 60 | 56 | 144 |
Melilla | 9 | 31 | 72 | 103 | 207 | 203 | 15 | 34 | 35 | 44 | 51 | 158 | 56 | 34 | 44 | 58 | 57 | 9 |
Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5, show that, in all the age ranges, the shortest mean durations are found in the most elemental occupations (i.e., in the lowest hierarchies), and the duration increases in all age ranges with the increasing occupational hierarchy, except in the group “Professionals”, who have shorter means than other groups of lower occupational hierarchy or lower qualification level.
Table 4.
Clerical Support Workers | Service and Sales Workers | Skilled Agricultural, Forestry and Fishery Workers | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16–25 | 26–35 | 36–45 | 46–55 | 56–65 | >65 | 16–25 | 26–35 | 36–45 | 46–55 | 56–65 | >65 | 16–25 | 26–35 | 36–45 | 46–55 | 56–65 | >65 | |
Andalusia | 15 | 29 | 35 | 46 | 60 | 84 | 50 | 44 | 41 | 57 | 79 | 69 | 37 | 48 | 65 | 96 | 118 | 142 |
Aragon | 21 | 30 | 40 | 55 | 47 | 47 | 43 | 58 | 81 | 100 | 240 | 16 | 35 | 43 | 40 | 42 | 103 | |
Asturias | 19 | 36 | 45 | 65 | 77 | 83 | 61 | 54 | 70 | 103 | 115 | 61 | 26 | 74 | 99 | 133 | 156 | 94 |
Balearic Islands | 12 | 19 | 29 | 39 | 56 | 82 | 54 | 53 | 56 | 75 | 124 | 70 | 17 | 27 | 31 | 56 | 82 | 282 |
Canary Islands | 20 | 31 | 43 | 45 | 57 | 80 | 74 | 82 | 71 | 76 | 102 | 86 | 17 | 36 | 48 | 68 | 101 | 77 |
Cantabria | 7 | 26 | 40 | 54 | 70 | 88 | 51 | 54 | 58 | 76 | 102 | 93 | 39 | 59 | 102 | 145 | 161 | 108 |
Castile and Leon | 12 | 31 | 43 | 54 | 70 | 51 | 49 | 40 | 46 | 70 | 89 | 51 | 36 | 62 | 74 | 106 | 133 | 137 |
Castile La Mancha | 14 | 25 | 34 | 46 | 62 | 53 | 48 | 47 | 45 | 72 | 97 | 78 | 41 | 42 | 56 | 76 | 85 | 59 |
Catalonia | 9 | 16 | 23 | 32 | 46 | 84 | 25 | 25 | 27 | 40 | 59 | 58 | 16 | 28 | 36 | 50 | 78 | 113 |
Extremadura | 26 | 38 | 51 | 60 | 69 | 64 | 129 | 132 | 117 | 151 | 165 | 97 | 43 | 58 | 72 | 94 | 106 | 114 |
Galicia | 26 | 44 | 54 | 66 | 85 | 111 | 74 | 64 | 64 | 78 | 92 | 66 | 91 | 87 | 122 | 158 | 190 | 228 |
Madrid | 10 | 19 | 24 | 29 | 38 | 57 | 29 | 23 | 24 | 34 | 49 | 43 | 12 | 19 | 27 | 35 | 50 | 87 |
Murcia | 19 | 30 | 41 | 53 | 71 | 91 | 67 | 52 | 49 | 69 | 87 | 67 | 51 | 62 | 72 | 100 | 131 | 143 |
Navarre | 16 | 42 | 27 | 44 | 68 | 21 | 33 | 51 | 97 | 74 | 104 | 15 | 18 | 20 | 24 | 37 | 17 | |
La Rioja | 13 | 25 | 29 | 41 | 61 | 52 | 30 | 33 | 39 | 68 | 87 | 44 | 15 | 22 | 41 | 54 | 74 | 131 |
Valencia | 17 | 29 | 40 | 52 | 69 | 95 | 53 | 40 | 36 | 45 | 60 | 43 | 31 | 41 | 55 | 74 | 98 | 172 |
Basque Country | 21 | 39 | 31 | 40 | 45 | 26 | 37 | 43 | 68 | 70 | 80 | 16 | 44 | 30 | 32 | 33 | ||
Ceuta | 40 | 28 | 36 | 53 | 64 | 213 | 73 | 92 | 111 | 112 | 103 | 25 | 3 | 315 | 25 | 25 | 53 | 30 |
Melilla | 34 | 49 | 43 | 43 | 70 | 21 | 71 | 83 | 92 | 105 | 169 | 50 | 14 | 12 | 28 | 46 | 67 |
Table 5.
Craft and Related Trades Workers |
Plant and Machine Operators, and Assemblers | Elementary Occupations | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16–25 | 26–35 | 36–45 | 46–55 | 56–65 | >65 | 16–25 | 26–35 | 36–45 | 46–55 | 56–65 | >65 | 16–25 | 26–35 | 36–45 | 46–55 | 56–65 | >65 | |
Andalusia | 15 | 16 | 19 | 26 | 35 | 19 | 8 | 8 | 11 | 16 | 21 | 12 | 23 | 18 | 18 | 29 | 36 | 29 |
Aragon | 54 | 62 | 96 | 99 | 96 | 50 | 16 | 22 | 41 | 53 | 47 | 51 | 30 | 28 | 37 | 42 | 51 | 6 |
Asturias | 17 | 29 | 37 | 48 | 49 | 26 | 9 | 16 | 24 | 32 | 27 | 5 | 13 | 10 | 14 | 27 | 34 | 20 |
Balearic Islands | 13 | 14 | 24 | 34 | 58 | 32 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 15 | 26 | 12 | 14 | 13 | 18 | 32 | 55 | 31 |
Canary Islands | 9 | 13 | 17 | 24 | 31 | 19 | 4 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 25 | 19 | 17 | 22 | 22 | 33 | 42 | 23 |
Cantabria | 14 | 24 | 34 | 42 | 61 | 25 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 24 | 28 | 16 | 11 | 10 | 14 | 23 | 33 | 19 |
Castile and Leon | 29 | 28 | 36 | 45 | 59 | 23 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 25 | 26 | 10 | 17 | 13 | 17 | 32 | 40 | 22 |
Castile La Mancha | 30 | 30 | 36 | 52 | 65 | 49 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 27 | 29 | 11 | 26 | 21 | 24 | 39 | 51 | 42 |
Catalonia | 6 | 8 | 14 | 20 | 31 | 23 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 20 | 12 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 16 | 24 | 17 |
Extremadura | 29 | 31 | 33 | 40 | 45 | 13 | 14 | 13 | 17 | 21 | 20 | 13 | 42 | 36 | 29 | 43 | 44 | 31 |
Galicia | 44 | 44 | 53 | 63 | 84 | 30 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 27 | 28 | 15 | 15 | 13 | 17 | 32 | 49 | 33 |
Madrid | 5 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 12 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 21 | 21 |
Murcia | 30 | 27 | 32 | 42 | 49 | 19 | 11 | 11 | 15 | 25 | 25 | 16 | 34 | 26 | 32 | 41 | 49 | 24 |
Navarre | 45 | 80 | 145 | 188 | 166 | 0 | 15 | 31 | 49 | 86 | 69 | 0 | 15 | 29 | 36 | 70 | 67 | 48 |
La Rioja | 31 | 37 | 48 | 81 | 95 | 18 | 5 | 9 | 15 | 26 | 27 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 13 | 27 | 35 | 23 |
Valencia | 18 | 18 | 23 | 29 | 35 | 16 | 10 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 22 | 12 | 16 | 12 | 14 | 22 | 29 | 11 |
Basque Country | 36 | 52 | 81 | 91 | 90 | 29 | 10 | 18 | 30 | 41 | 37 | 1 | 16 | 21 | 26 | 39 | 35 | 22 |
Ceuta | 15 | 11 | 23 | 28 | 27 | 8 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 22 | 28 | 0 | 15 | 24 | 31 | 47 | 44 | 11 |
Melilla | 16 | 15 | 20 | 28 | 50 | 143 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 19 | 34 | 0 | 22 | 22 | 28 | 50 | 87 |
The shortest mean SA durations are found in the age range 16–25 years in the group “Plant and machine operators, and assemblers”, whereas the longest mean SA durations are found in the group “Managers” in the age range over 65 years.
Interestingly, in the age range 16–25 years the mean duration is longer than in other age ranges in the case of “Service and sales workers”, being longer than that of the next two age ranges (26–35 and 36–45) in almost all ACs.
Data relating to the number of SA cases that finished in 2019, analyzing the different diagnostic episodes (ICD-10) in relation to occupational level following the ISCO-08, are available online (Table S2).
There is a high percentage of cases in which the occupation was coded, which may distort the data.
Among the informed cases, the largest number of workers in SA is concentrated in the episode “Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue”, in the occupational groups “Elementary occupations” (n = 28,626), “Service and sales workers”, (n = 26,448) and “Plant and machine operators, and assemblers” (n = 9267), followed by the episode “Mental and behavioral disorders”, which mainly affects the occupational groups “Service and sales workers” (n = 12,741), “Elementary occupations” (n = 7467) and “Professionals” (n = 6813).
4. Discussion
As we hypothesized that new measures could be introduced to improve workplaces, workers could take up their jobs sooner, and benefits could be managed more efficiently in AC, the results of this study reveal findings related to SA as a function of worker occupation in Spain, describing the situation immediately before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic by Autonomous Community.
The problem when analyzing SA by occupational classes was the high percentage of SA cases in which the occupational class was not documented, which occurred in several specific communities: Navarre (94%), Aragon (90%), the Basque Country (90%) and Extremadura (26%). Therefore, the results in these ACs have not been reliable and may have altered the results, as was previously commented upon; however, the study is still of great interest, as it shows the distribution of SA.
Great differences were found in all occupational groups, as is reflected by the high standard deviations obtained in the statistical analysis.
The highest SA rates correspond to “Elementary occupations”, “Craft and related trades workers” and “Clerical support workers”. These data are in line with the findings of previous studies, especially regarding the most elemental occupations and those with greater physical responsibility [10,22]. The most surprising finding of this study, in contrast with the international literature, could be the high SA rate in workers with administration duties and in office workers [17]. This could be due to the fact that a high percentage of workers with these administrative occupations are in the public sector, who show higher SA rates than those in the private sector [23,24].
Regarding SA duration, the longest durations are found in women of the group “Skilled agricultural, forestry and fishery workers”, especially in Galicia, Cantabria, Castile and Leon, Asturias, Murcia and Andalusia. However, these results must be considered with caution, since the percentage of female workers in this episode is very insignificant with respect to other occupations taken by women [20]. A possible explanation for this finding is the large number of such workers who are self-employed, among whom the mean durations are usually very long [25].
With respect to the analysis by age range, the mean SA duration increases with the age of the worker, with this effect being less pronounced in “Elementary occupations”. This could be due to several reasons. On the one hand, there could be an information bias in these professions, and thus, in reality, there may be few SA processes in which the occupation and age were documented, as was previously commented upon. On the other hand, this could also be due to the natural selection of the more elemental activities, which, for their physical load, exclude workers as their age increases; in addition, the natural process is that older workers go up in the hierarchy of the company, which is why elemental occupations are carried out by younger individuals [26]. Their mean SA duration, by AC and age range, is much shorter than that of other occupational groups, and this group shows the shortest mean durations in people over 65 years of age with respect to other age ranges. The shorter duration in this group could be due to the fact that, in many cases, these are precarious, temporary, half-time jobs performed by workers with little qualification, generally with low economic resources, who fear being fired if they extend their SA without justification [4,27].
In line with what is described above, the results of the number of SA cases as a function of worker occupation and diagnostic episode show that the diagnoses with higher SA rate in all occupations are musculoskeletal disorders, followed by mental disorders [17].
The proportional distribution between groups is the most relevant aspect. Thus, “Service and sales workers”, “Elementary occupations”, “Plant and machine operators, and assemblers” show a much greater rate of musculoskeletal disorders, which, in most cases, is three times more frequent than that of mental disorders. This is in agreement with the results of previous studies on this topic, which report a greater prevalence of pathologies at the locomotor level in blue collar workers, with precarious jobs, more disadvantaged physical conditions and a more demanding physical load [18,22,28,29].
Mental disorders gain relevance in occupations with higher qualification levels, such as “Professional, Managers, and Service” and sales workers. Previous studies have also reported these findings, indicating that these occupations can cause great personal exhaustion, especially those related to healthcare and caregiving [30,31,32], whereas, in managers, SA by mental disorders is rather attributed to the high stress levels, although, in general, few directors and managers initiate a sick leave for this reason [33,34].
It is also important to highlight the proportion of neoplasms and cardiovascular diseases as the cause of AS in managers, as well as neoplasms in scientific and intellectual professionals in health and education, which indicates that in highly qualified workers with a higher education level and higher degree of responsibility, when they initiate a SA process it is generally due to the severity of the pathology that causes it [13,34], with presenteeism being very frequent in both occupational groups [35,36,37]. These data are in line with those of previous studies published internationally and in Spain [38,39,40].
The results of this study show important differences between the Autonomous Communities in Spain.
The Autonomous Communities with the highest SA rates in almost all occupational groups are Catalonia and Madrid. These two Autonomous Communities have the lowest unemployment figures in Spain, the highest salaries and the highest percentage of employed workers [20]. These results could be explained on the basis of other studies showing that employees have higher rates of SA than the self-employed, that in areas where unemployment is lower there is more SA, as the worker is not so afraid of being fired for being on sick leave, and that workers with higher salaries also have more SA [13,27,41,42,43].
The highest average duration is found in Galicia, Extremadura and Castile and Leon. These three Autonomous Communities have an older population, with a higher percentage of self-employed workers and most of their workers are agricultural workers with precarious jobs, which means that sick leave is longer, in line with other studies [4,26,27].
However, we must be careful with these statements, as the descriptive design of the study does not allow us to draw conclusions about causality, and there may be more causes than those described here that explain these findings. It would be interesting to carry out further studies, with a different statistical design, to explore this subject in more detail.
Another important limitation of this study is that only one year is analysed (2019), so we lack a time perspective that would allow us to assess the trend in SA in Spain, in relation to our study hypothesis.
5. Conclusions
The highest SA frequency is found among workers of the lowest occupational classes. The longest mean duration corresponds to workers with higher qualification, especially in the group “Managers”. In Spain, there is a high SA rate in “Clerical support workers”, which is in contrast with the findings of studies conducted in other European countries. In blue collar workers, there is a predominance of SA by musculoskeletal disorders. SA by mental disorders acquires relevance in the occupational groups with higher qualification levels.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the National Institute of Social Security for helping with the databases.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at www.mpdi.com/xxx/s1, Table S1: Descriptive analysis by ISCO-08 sickness absence duration in the Autonomous Communities in Spain and Table S2: Number of sickness absences cases by CIE-10 and ISCO-08.
Author Contributions
M.L.A.-J., M.J.A.-B., N.M.-M., M.T.L.-M. and R.M.-V. conceived the original proposal and drafted the original manuscript. M.L.A.-J., M.J.A.-B., N.M.-M. and R.M.-V. contributed to the development and refinement and statistical analysis of the protocol. All authors critically appraised the drafted manuscript and made important intellectual contributions to the writing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The University of Malaga through a predoctoral grant supports MLAJ, 900004852 a PhD student at the University. Financing is awaiting approval.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Malaga Provincial Investigation Ethics Committee, the day 26 March 2020.
Informed Consent Statement
The patient’s consent was waived, because it was anonymous data.
Data Availability Statement
You can consult the data used in https://www.seg-social.es/wps/portal/wss/internet/EstadisticasPresupuestosEstudios/PublicacionesDocumentacion/47999/c53ff6f9-aef0-4a67-b26f-0c6031efbeb8; https://www.ine.es/ (accessed on 27 August 2021).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Real Decreto 8/2015 por el que se Aprueba el Texto Refundido de la Ley General de la Seguridad Social. Boletín Of del Estado; Madrid, Spain: 2015. [(accessed on 23 April 2021)]. pp. 1–157. Available online: http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/1994/06/29/pdfs/A20658-20708.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Real Decreto 1300 / 1995, de 21 de Julio, por el que se Desarrolla, en Materia de Incapacidades Laborales del Sistema de la Seguridad Social, la Ley 42 / 1994, de 30 de Diciembre, de Medidas Fiscales, Administrativas y de Orden Social. Vol. 198. Boletín Of del Estado; Madrid, Spain: 1995. pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Real Decreto 625/2014, de 18 de Julio, por el que se Regulan Determinados Aspectos de la Gestión y Control de los Procesos por Incapacidad Temporal en los Primeros Trescientos Sesenta y Cinco días de su Duración. Vol. 176. Boletín Of del Estado; Madrid, Spain: 2014. pp. 57579–57595. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Alba-Jurado M.L., Aguado-Benedí M.J., Moreno-Morales N., Labajos-Manzanares M.T., Martín-Valero R. Descriptive study of sickness absence in Spanish regions in 2018: Database study. BMJ Open. 2020;10:1–17. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Helgesson M., Johansson B., Nordqvist T., Lundberg I., Vingard E. Sickness absence at a young age and later sickness absence, disability pension, death, unemployment and income in native Swedes and immigrants. Eur. J. Public Health. 2015;25:688–692. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Salonen L., Blomgren J., Laaksonen M., Niemelä M. Sickness absence as a predictor of disability retirement in different occupational classes: A register-based study of a working-age cohort in Finland in 2007–2014. BMJ Open. 2018;8:1–8. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bryngelson A. Long-term sickness absence and social exclusion. Scand. J. Public Health. 2009;37:839–845. doi: 10.1177/1403494809346871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Airaksinen J., Jokela M., Virtanen M., Oksanen T., Koskenvuo M., Pentti J., Vahtera J., Kivimäki M. Prediction of long-term absence due to sickness in employees: Development and validation of a multifactorial risk score in two cohort studies. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health. 2018;44:274–282. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Virtanen M., Kivimäki M., Vahtera J., Elovainio M., Sund R., Virtanen P., Ferrie J.E. Sickness absence as a risk factor for job termination, unemployment, and disability pension among temporary and permanent employees. Occup. Environ. Med. 2006;63:212–217. doi: 10.1136/oem.2005.020297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Blomgren J., Jäppinen S. Incidence and length of sickness absence among hierarchical occupational classes and non-wage-earners: A register study of 1.6 million finns. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:501. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Salonen L., Blomgren J., Laaksonen M. From long-term sickness absence to disability retirement: Diagnostic and occupational class differences within the working-age Finnish population. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09158-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vuorio T., Suominen S., Kautiainen H., Korhonen P. Determinants of sickness absence rate among Finnish municipal employees. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care. 2019;37:3–9. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1568710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leinonen T., Viikari-Juntura E., Husgafvel-Pursiainen K., Solovieva S. Cause-specific sickness absence trends by occupational class and industrial sector in the context of recent labour market changes: A Finnish panel data study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:1–11. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Magnusson Hanson L.L., Leineweber C., Persson V., Hyde M., Theorell T., Westerlund H. Cohort profile: The Swedish longitudinal occupational survey of health (SLOSH) Int. J. Epidemiol. 2018;47:691I–692I. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ulrik L. Long-Term Sickness Absence: Aspects of Society, Work, and Family. Karolinska Instituted; Stockholm, Sweden: 2010. 56p [Google Scholar]
- 16.Livanos L., Zangelidis A. Sickness Absence: A Pan-European Study. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. 2010. Report No.: 22627. [(accessed on 14 May 2021)]. Available online: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/22627/
- 17.Pekkala J., Blomgren J., Pietiläinen O., Lahelma E., Rahkonen O. Occupational class differences in long sickness absence: A register-based study of 2.1 million Finnish women and men in 1996–2013. BMJ Open. 2017;7:1–8. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Helgadóttir B., Narusyte J., Ropponen A., Bergström G., Mather L., Blom V., Svedberg P. The role of occupational class on the association between sickness absence and disability pension: A Swedish register-based twin study. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health. 2019;45:622–630. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Piha K., Laaksonen M., Martikainen P., Rahkonen O., Lahelma E. Interrelationships between education, occupational class, income and sickness absence. Eur. J. Public Health. 2010;20:276–280. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Instituto Nacional de Estadística . España en Cifras 2019. Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE); Madrid, Spain: 2020. [(accessed on 16 January 2021)]. Available online: http://www.ine.es/prodyser/espa_cifras. [Google Scholar]
- 21.International Labour Office . International Standard Classification of Occupations. Volume 1. ILO Cat Publ Data; Geneva, Switzerland: 2012. p. 433. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pekkala J., Blomgren J., Pietiläinen O., Lahelma E., Rahkonen O. Occupational class differences in diagnostic-specific sickness absence: A register-based study in the Finnish population, 2005–2014. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4674-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alexopoulos E.C., Merekoulias G., Tanagra D., Konstantinou E.C., Mikelatou E., Jelastopulu E. Sickness absence in the private sector of Greece: Comparing shipyard industry and national insurance data. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2012;9:1171–1181. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9041171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zaballa E., Martínez J.M., Duran X., Albertí C., Gimeno Ruiz de Porras D., Benavides F.G. Incidence of sickness absence by type of employment contract: One year follow-up study in Spanish salaried workers. Arch. Public Health. 2016;74:40. doi: 10.1186/s13690-016-0152-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rosta J., Tellnes G., Aasland O.G. Differences in sickness absence between self-employed and employed doctors: A cross-sectional study on national sample of Norwegian doctors in 2010. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2014;14:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Oke A., Braithwaite P., Antai D. Sickness absence and precarious employment: A comparative cross-national study of Denmark, Finland, Sweden, and Norway. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2016;7:125–147. doi: 10.15171/ijoem.2016.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Renahy E., Mitchell C., Molnar A., Muntaner C., Ng E., Ali F., O’Campo P. Connections between unemployment insurance, poverty and health: A systematic review. Eur. J. Public Health. 2018;28:269–275. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Čikeš V., Ribarić H.M., Črnjar K. The determinants and outcomes of absence behavior: A systematic literature review. Soc. Sci. 2018;7:120. doi: 10.3390/socsci7080120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yoshimoto T., Oka H., Katsuhira J., Fujii T., Masuda K., Tanaka S., Matsudaira K. Prognostic psychosocial factors for disabling low back pain in Japanese hospital workers. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0177908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Thorsen S.V., Friborg C., Lundstrøm B., Kausto J., Örnelius K., Sundell T., Kalstø Å.M., Thune O., Gross B., Petersen H., et al. The Sickness Absence in the Nordic Countries. Sickness Absence in the Nordic Countries. Nordic Social Statistical Committee; Copenhagen, Denmark: 2015. pp. 9–13. [Google Scholar]
- 31.de Vries H., Fishta A., Weikert B., Rodriguez Sanchez A., Wegewitz U. Determinants of Sickness Absence and Return to Work Among Employees with Common Mental Disorders: A Scoping Review. J. Occup. Rehabil. 2018;28:393–417. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9730-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Scharf J., Angerer P., Müting G., Loerbroks A. Return to work after common mental disorders: A qualitative study exploring the expectations of the involved stakeholders. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:6635. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kaikkonen R., Härkänen T., Rahkonen O., Gould R., Koskinen S. Explaining educational differences in sickness absence: A population-based follow-up study. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health. 2015;41:338–346. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Seglem K.B., Ørstavik R., Torvik F.A., Røysamb E., Vollrath M. Education differences in sickness absence and the role of health behaviors: A prospective twin study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09741-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lazo Páez A., Roldán Abellán B. Implicaciones del presentismo en la productividad laboral del área de la salud. Med. Leg. Costa Rica. 2015;32:1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bergström G., Gustafsson K., Aboagye E., Marklund S., Aronsson G., Björklund C., Leineweber C. A resourceful work environment moderates the relationship between presenteeism and health. A study using repeated measures in the swedish working population. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:4711. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Johansen V. Sickness presenteeism in Norway and Sweden. Nord. J. Soc. Res. 2013;3 doi: 10.7577/njsr.2063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Peña Longobardo L.M., Aranda Reneo I., Oliva-Moreno J., Vall Castello J. Evaluación de las pérdidas laborales provocadas enfermedades y lesiones en España en el año 2009. [(accessed on 8 April 2021)];Rev. Evaluación Programas Políticas Públicas. 2016 1:66–85. doi: 10.5944/reppp.6.2016.13841. Available online: http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/REPPP/article/view/13841. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nexo M.A., Carlsen K., Pedersen J., Hetland M.L., Watt T., Hansen S.M., Bjorner J.B. Long-term sickness absence of 32 chronic conditions: A Danish register-based longitudinal study with up to 17 years of follow-up. BMJ Open. 2018;8:1–10. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jakovljevic M., Malmose-Stapelfeldt C., Milovanovic O., Rancic N., Bokonjic D. Disability, Work Absenteeism, Sickness Benefits, and Cancer in Selected European OECD Countries—Forecasts to 2020. [(accessed on 24 March 2021)];Front. Public Health. 2017 5:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00023. Available online: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00023/full. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vicente Pardo J.M. La Incapacidad laboral como indicador de gestión sanitaria. Med. Segur. Trab. 2015;61:207–219. doi: 10.4321/S0465-546X2015000200007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Urbanos-Garrido R.M., López-Valcárcel B.G. Unemployment and health: An analysis of the impact of the economic crisis on the health of the Spanish population. Estud. Econ. Apl. 2013;31:303–326. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gomez M.A.L., Serra L., Delclos G.L., Benavides F.G. Employment history indicators and mortality in a nested case-control study from the Spanish WORKing life social security (WORKss) cohort. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0178486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
You can consult the data used in https://www.seg-social.es/wps/portal/wss/internet/EstadisticasPresupuestosEstudios/PublicacionesDocumentacion/47999/c53ff6f9-aef0-4a67-b26f-0c6031efbeb8; https://www.ine.es/ (accessed on 27 August 2021).