Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 1999 Dec;37(12):3901–3905. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.12.3901-3905.1999

Disseminated Infection with Mycobacterium genavense: a Challenge to Physicians and Mycobacteriologists

Vibeke Østergaard Thomsen 1,*, Ulrik Bak Dragsted 2, Jeanett Bauer 1, Kurt Fuursted 1,, Jens Lundgren 2
PMCID: PMC85841  PMID: 10565904

Abstract

In the present study we compared the clinical presentations of patients with a clinical diagnosis of AIDS and disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection (n = 12) with those of patients with AIDS and disseminated M. avium complex (MAC) infection (n = 24). Abdominal pain was seen more frequently in the group of patients infected with M. genavense than in patients infected with MAC (P = 0.003). Analysis of microbiological data revealed that stool specimens from patients infected with M. genavense were more often smear positive than stool specimens from patients infected with MAC (P = 0.00002). However, M. genavense could be cultured on solid media from only 15.4% of the stool specimens, whereas MAC could be cultured from 71.4% of the specimens. Bone marrow and liver biopsy specimens yielded growth of M. genavense within a reasonably short time, allowing species identification by DNA technology. Microbiological data clearly demonstrated the importance of acidic liquid medium for primary culture, the avoidance of pretreatment and the use of additives in culture, and the necessity for prolonged incubation if M. genavense is suspected. Susceptibility testing showed that M. genavense is sensitive to rifamycins, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides, whereas it is resistant to isoniazid. Susceptibility to ethambutol and clofazimine could not be evaluated. The mean survival times of patients in the two groups were similar.


The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pandemic has resulted in an increase in the incidence of disseminated infections caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) (12, 27). Infections with NTM in AIDS patients are associated with increased morbidity and high rates of mortality. In one study, the mean survival time for untreated patients was found to be only 5.6 months after a diagnosis of disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection (13). Although the most commonly isolated species belong to MAC, several other mycobacterial species have been described as pathogens for HIV-infected patients. In 1990 Hirschel and coworkers (10) described a fatal infection, characterized by fever, massive weight loss, anemia, and diarrhea, caused by an unidentified mycobacterium. This novel mycobacterium was described in 1992 by Böttger et al. (3), who also proposed the name M. genavense. Since then, M. genavense has been isolated from patients throughout Europe (3, 26), Australia (14), and North America (1, 17, 18, 23). In the Swiss HIV cohort study, M. genavense accounted for 12.8% of the disseminated NTM infections diagnosed between 1990 and 1992 (19).

In this study, we compared the clinical presentations of patients with disseminated infection caused by M. genavense to those of patients infected with MAC, which is the most common cause of disseminated NTM disease in Denmark. Results of microbiological analyses performed with clinical specimens from M. genavense- and MAC-infected patients were analyzed, and recommendations for specimen collection and laboratory methodologies for the detection of M. genavense are proposed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimens.

All specimens that were received between January 1991 and April 1995 and that grew M. genavense on culture were identified retrospectively from the laboratory records at the Department of Mycobacteriology at the Statens Serum Institut. That laboratory serves as a central laboratory for diagnostic mycobacteriology in Denmark, receiving roughly 25,000 specimens each year.

Patients and ethics.

For evaluation of symptoms and clinical findings, each patient with disseminated M. genavense infection was matched by nationality (Danish versus foreign subjects) and age (within 5 years) with two patients with disseminated MAC infection who had attended the Department of Infectious Diseases at Hvidovre University Hospital within the study period. For all patients and controls, information regarding symptoms, clinical findings, survival, and results of laboratory investigations were obtained from the patients' medical records and were used to fill in a standard questionnaire. Filing of results was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (file no. 1997-1200-346).

Specimen processing.

Specimens were processed by a standard methodology, although the decontamination procedure for peritoneal fluid, bronchoalveolar lavage, sputum, stool, skin biopsy, lymph node, pus, synovial joint fluid, and urine specimens was changed from the N-acetyl–l-cysteine–sodium dodecyl sulfate method to the NaOH method in August 1993. After decontamination, the bacteria were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 6.8) and concentrated by centrifugation (3,000 × g, 20 min). The pellets were resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline and were used for preparation of smears and for inoculation into culture media. Smears were stained with auramine-rhodamine and were examined for the presence of acid-fast bacilli. The specimens were inoculated into one or more culture media. Blood and bone marrow were inoculated into BACTEC 13A (13A) vials, and the remaining specimens were inoculated into BACTEC 12B (12B) vials and onto a solid medium (Löwenstein-Jensen medium with sodium pyruvate or Middlebrook 7H10 medium). Specimens expected to contain large numbers of contaminating microorganisms, like stool and pus specimens, were inoculated onto solid medium only. The inoculated culture media were incubated for a maximum of 8 weeks (smear-negative specimens) or 16 weeks (smear-positive specimens). Species identification was first performed by hybridization to probes specific for the M. tuberculosis complex and MAC to rule out these species (AccuProbe; GenProbe, Sparks, Md.) (7, 8, 15). If these reactions were negative, PCR-restriction enzyme pattern analysis (25) or automated cycle sequencing of hypervariable region A of the gene encoding 16S rRNA (16) was applied. Identification of the species of second or later mycobacterial isolates from individual patients was performed as described above, or identification to the species level was made according to the growth characteristics, pigmentation, and/or morphology identified from the first specimen.

Optimum pH.

The optimum pH was investigated with M. genavense isolates from six patients. Two hundred microliters from drug-free BACTEC PZA Test Medium vials in which a growth index (GI) of 999 had been reached was transferred to 12B vials in which the pH had been adjusted to 6.8, 6.4, 6.0, 5.5, or 5.0 with phosphoric acid. The daily GI was recorded, and the generation times were calculated from the slope of the growth curve on the basis of daily GI determinations.

Susceptibility testing.

Susceptibility testing was performed by the BACTEC Indirect Qualitative Test as recommended for M. tuberculosis (9) yet modified with the use of BACTEC PZA Test Medium vials to enhance the growth of M. genavense. One hundred microliters of a BACTEC PZA Test Medium vial in which the GI had just reached 999 was used as the inoculum. The isolates were investigated with the following drugs at the indicated concentrations: ethambutol, 2.5 or 7.5 μg/ml; rifampin, 2 μg/ml; isoniazid, 1 μg/ml; amikacin, 5 μg/ml; clofazimine, 1 μg/ml; rifabutin, 0.25 or 1 μg/ml; ciprofloxacin, 2 μg/ml; ofloxacin, 4 μg/ml; roxithromycin, 5 μg/ml; clarithromycin, 2 μg/ml; azithromycin, 2 μg/ml; and fusidic acid, 25 μg/ml. Isolates were regarded as resistant if the daily change in the GI of the drug-containing vial exceeded that for the 1% control vial. Isolates were regarded as sensitive if the GI of the drug-containing vial decreased, whereas isolates were regarded as borderline if the GI increased less than that for the 1% control vial.

Statistics.

The chi-square test with Fisher's exact test (when appropriate) was used to identify possible significant differences in symptoms and clinical findings in patients and controls. Student's t test was used to determine whether differences between continuous data (survival, CD4+ counts, detection times) were significant.

RESULTS

Patients.

Twelve patients with at least one blood, bone marrow, or biopsy specimen that grew M. genavense on culture and 24 patients with disseminated MAC infection were identified. Demographic data and information on mycobacterial prophylaxis and antiretroviral treatment for patients and controls are presented in Table 1. No significant differences were observed between the two groups. The male-to-female ratio was 3:1 for patients infected with M. genavense, whereas the male-to-female ratio was 11:1 for the MAC-infected controls. The general Danish AIDS population had a male-to-female ratio of 10:1 (1,589 males and 155 females) in the second quarter of 1995 (5).

TABLE 1.

Demographics, symptoms, and clinical findings for HIV-positive patients with disseminated M. genavense infection and disseminated MAC infection

Characteristic M. genavense(n = 12) MAC (n = 24)
Sex (no. of patients)
 Men  9 22
 Women  3  2
Nationality (no. of Danes/no. of foreigners) 11/1 22/2
Age (yr [mean/median]) 34.8/34.0 35.2/33.5
Risk group (no. of patients)
 Homosexual  7 18
 Heterosexual  2  5
 Injection drug abuse  0  1
 Blood transfusion  1  0
 Other or unknown  2  0
No. of patients with:
 Antimycobacterial prophylaxis  0  0
 Antiretroviral treatment  7 11
No. of patients with the following/total no.:
 Fever 9/12 20/22
 Weight loss 9/12 16/21
 Anorexia 7/12 10/19
 Lymphadenopathy 6/12 5/18
 Anemia 8/12 11/24
 Pancytopenia 6/10 11/24
 Abdominal paina 6/10 1/24
 Diarrhea 5/12 6/24
 Splenomegaly 5/12 8/24
 Hepatomegaly 3/12 5/24
Mean CD4+ count (106/liter) 18b 15c
Mean survival time (wk) 36d 34c
a

Significant (P = 0.003). 

b

n = 11. 

c

n = 24. 

d

n = 12. 

Symptoms and clinical findings.

Table 1 displays the symptoms and clinical findings recorded in the medical files for patients and controls. Abdominal pain was found significantly more often in M. genavense-infected patients than in MAC-infected patients (P = 0.003). No significant differences in paraclinical manifestations were observed. The mean survival time after collection of the first smear or culture-positive specimen was 36 weeks (range, 6 to 116 weeks) for M. genavense-infected patients and 34 weeks (range, 3 to 163 weeks) for MAC-infected patients, the difference of which is not significant.

Specimens.

Eighty-three specimens (range, 1 to 14 specimens per patient) from the M. genavense-infected patients and 153 specimens (range, 1 to 15 specimens per patient) from the MAC-infected patients were cultured. The results of microbiological analyses are presented in Table 2. Fifty-seven specimens from the M. genavense-infected patients were negative by both smear examination and culture. Acid-fast bacilli were detected by smear examination in 12 (21.1%) specimens, of which 9 (75.0%) were stool specimens. Only 4 (33.3%) of these smear-positive specimens grew M. genavense on culture. M. genavense was cultured from 14 additional smear-negative specimens. We found, however, that only five (5.7%) specimens from MAC-infected patients were smear positive, of which three were also culture positive. A further 75 (50.0%) specimens were culture positive only for MAC. Detection times differed among culture media and among species. For M. genavense, the median detection time was 20 days (range, 7 to 54 days) for 13A, 8 days (range, 6 to 40 days) for 12B, and 41 days (range, 35 to 47 days) for solid media. The corresponding values for MAC were 9 days (range, 6 to 57 days) for 13A, 12.5 days (range, 6 to 50 days) for 12B, and 24 days (range, 11 to 49 days) for solid media.

TABLE 2.

Microbiological results for various specimen categoriesa

Specimen Culture medium M. genavense
MAC
No. (%) of specimens
Median time (days [range]) to culture positivity No. (%) of specimens
Median time (days [range]) to culture positivity
Total Smear positive Culture positive Total Smear positive Culture positive
BAL 12B + solid 1 0 (0) 0 (0) 11 0 (0) 4 (36.4) 10 (8–25)
Blood 13A 22 NA 4 (25)b 46 (30–54) 55 NA 31 (58.5)c 9 (6–52)
Bone biopsy 12B + solid 1 0 (0) 0 (0) 0
Bone marrow 13A 10 1 (16.7)d 7 (70) 15 (7–28) 11 NA 8 (72.7) 10 (6–57)
CSF 12B + Dubos + solid 6 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 0 (0) 1 (33.3) 15
Liver biopsy 12B + solid 4 0 (0) 3 (75) 6 (6–40) 13 0 (0) 9 (69.2) 12 (6–49)
Lymph node 12B + solid 2 2 (100) 1 (50)  8 1 0 (0) 1 (100) 11
Peritoneal fluid 12B + solid 1 0 (0) 0 (0) 0
Pus Solid 4 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 1 (100) 0 (0)
Skin biopsy 12B + solid 1 0 (0) 0 (0) 0
Sputum or gastric lavage 12B + solid 8 0 (0) 1 (12.5) 37 26 2 (7.7) 8 (30.8) 15 (14–42)
Stool Solid 14 9 (64.3) 2 (15.4)e 41 (35–47) 22 0 (0) 15 (71.4)e 24 (11–35)
Synovial fluid 12B + solid 3 0 (0) 0 (0) 0
Urine 12B + solid 5 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 1 (25.0) 1 (25.0) 18
Miscellaneous Variable 1 0 (0) 0 (0) 6 1 (16.7) 0 (0)
 Total Variable 83 12 (21.1) 18 (23.7) 153 5 (5.7) 78 (52.0)
a

Abbreviations: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; solid, a solid medium; NA, not analyzed. 

b

Six specimens were contaminated on all culture media. 

c

Two specimens were contaminated on all culture media. 

d

Four specimens were not analyzed. 

e

One specimen was contaminated on all culture media. 

For specimens that grew M. genavense, the mean detection times for pretreated and nontreated specimens were 31.8 and 23.8 days, respectively. The corresponding values for the specimens that were culture positive for MAC were 21.4 and 14.4 days. The mean detection time was significantly longer for M. genavense than for MAC for both pretreated (P < 0.025) and nontreated (P < 0.010) specimens.

Species identification.

At least one isolate per patient was tested with hybridization probes for M. tuberculosis and MAC. All isolates tested were negative with the M. tuberculosis complex-specific probe, and all MAC-infected patients had at least one positive result with probes specific for species within MAC. For all M. genavense-infected patients, at least one isolate was identified as M. genavense by DNA sequencing of hypervariable region A of the 16S rRNA gene (16).

Optimum pH.

The bacterial generation times estimated from the time that the daily GI started to increase indicate that growth is enhanced at pH 5.5 (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Generation times for M. genavense subcultured at various pHs

pH Generation time (h) for isolates from the following patients:
1 2 5 7 8 10 Mean
6.8 NGa 86 NG 145 NG NG 115.5
6.4 NG 57 336 64 187 302 189.5
6.0 146 43 61 40 82 72 74.0
5.5 50 39 49 39 44 40 43.5
5.0 60 56 84 44 69 44 59.5
a

NG, no growth. 

Susceptibility testing.

The results of susceptibility testing on BACTEC PZA Test Medium (pH 6.0) are presented in Table 4. All M. genavense isolates tested were susceptible to rifampin, rifabutin, roxithromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, and fusidic acid. Ten of 12 strains were susceptible to amikacin, and most strains (9 of 12) were susceptible to the fluoroquinolones ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin. Resistance to ethambutol was detected in 9 of 12 isolates, resistance to clofazimine was detected in 4 of 12 isolates, and resistance to isoniazid was detected in 11 of 12 isolates. In order to investigate whether ethambutol, clofazimine, and isoniazid retained their activities at pH 6.0, we inoculated a susceptible strain of M. tuberculosis at pH 6.0. We found that M. tuberculosis was resistant to both ethambutol and clofazimine and was susceptible to isoniazid at pH 6.0, indicating that ethambutol and clofazimine had decreased activities at pH 6.0.

TABLE 4.

Testing of susceptibility of clinical isolates of M. genavense from 12 patients to antimycobacterial drugs evaluated from BACTEC PZA Test Medium vials at pH 6.0a

Drug Concn (μg/ml) No. of strains
Sensitive Borderline Resistant
Rifampin 2.0 12 0 0
Isoniazid 1.0 0 1 11
Amikacin 5.0 10 2 0
Rifabutin 0.25/1.0b 12 0 0
Ciprofloxacin 2.0 9 2 1
Ofloxacin 4.0 9 2 1
Roxithromycin 5.0 12 0 0
Clarithromycin 2.0 12 0 0
Azithromycin 2.0 6 0 0
Fusidic acid 25.0 12 0 0
a

Susceptibility testing on ethambutol and clofazimine could not be carried out at pH 6.0. 

b

Results are for nine/three isolates, respectively. 

DISCUSSION

Between January 1991 and April 1995, we identified 12 patients whose clinical specimens grew M. genavense on culture. All patients had at least one blood, bone marrow, or biopsy specimen which was culture positive, suggesting that M. genavense was the source of infection and not an opportunistic colonizer. In addition, more than half of the patients had smear-positive specimens that demonstrated numerous bacteria. All patients infected with M. genavense were suffering from AIDS and were severely immunocompromised at the time that specimens containing M. genavense were taken. The median age and HIV risk groups were comparable to those for the general Danish AIDS population (5), whereas the male-to-female ratio was lower.

The only significant difference between patients and controls was more frequent abdominal pain in M. genavense-infected patients. This could possibly be due to the presence of a larger number of bacteria in the intestines of M. genavense-infected patients, as we found that stool specimens from five of six patients who had submitted such specimens were smear positive. Of these, four experienced abdominal pain. No stool specimens from MAC-infected patients were positive. Sex, age, nationality, HIV risk group, and prophylactic treatment were not significantly different between patients and controls. No difference in survival was observed, consistent with the finding of similar CD4+ cell counts in the two groups. No significant differences in the frequencies of fever, weight loss, anorexia, lymph adenopathy, anemia, pancytopenia, diarrhea, splenomegaly, and hepatomegaly were observed between the two groups.

We detected M. genavense by smear examination in bone marrow, stool, and biopsy specimens only, indicating the presence of numerous bacteria in such specimens. It has been described previously (1, 2, 4, 24) that M. genavense grows poorly in vitro. Our data support this observation, as only one-third of the smear-positive specimens became culture positive. Culture-positive specimens comprised blood, bone marrow, liver biopsy, lymph node, sputum, and stool specimens. Several scientists have cultured M. genavense in broth media; however, few have been able to culture M. genavense on solid media (4). Although scanty growth was detected in the condensed water of Löwenstein-Jensen medium, we also found growth to be superior in broth media. Our study therefore supports the recommendation that primary isolation should include a broth medium incubated for at least 8 weeks (4).

The low culture positivity rate for smear-positive specimens raises questions concerning viability after transportation and decontamination and the suitability of culture conditions. The mean detection time for M. genavense was significantly longer than that for MAC in both pretreated and nontreated specimens. Recovery of M. genavense from specimens subjected to decontamination was found to be 10.3%, while recovery was 37.8% for nontreated specimens. It is unlikely that these figures were caused by the presence of larger numbers of bacteria in nontreated specimens, as 1 nontreated and 11 pretreated specimens were smear positive. The low rate of recovery from pretreated specimens is believed to be due to a decontamination that was too harsh or the exclusive use of a solid medium for some specimens.

Realini et al. (22) recently described that the addition of polymyxin B, amphotericin B, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim, and azlocillin (PANTA) antibiotic mixture to primary culture impedes the in vitro growth of M. genavense. This is substantiated by our observation that no specimens culture positive for M. genavense have been identified after an increased amount of PANTA was added to primary cultures in mid-1995 in order to reduce overgrowth by contaminating microorganisms.

Use of BACTEC PZA Test Medium or lowering of the pH of the culture medium might further improve the isolation of M. genavense, as optimal growth was found at pH 5.5. The detection time for M. genavense was seen to be significantly lower for bone marrow and liver biopsy specimens than for other culture-positive specimens (P < 0.005). From the microbiological point of view, microbiological analyses of these specimens are recommended if disseminated M. genavense infection is suspected by the clinician. At present, species identification of M. genavense relies on nucleic acid-based methods. DNA sequencing, which might be a rather unsuitable technique for many laboratories, and the PCR-restriction enzyme pattern analysis method developed by Telenti and coworkers (25) work equally well in our experience (data not shown). Alternatively, a genus-specific PCR followed by an M. genavense-specific hybridization or an M. genavense-specific PCR could be used to identify isolates from solid or liquid media to the species level. As M. genavense did not produce a sufficient amount of colonies on solid media, traditional biochemical tests for comparison with other species could not be performed.

Regarding drug susceptibility, we found that M. genavense, in contrast to MAC, is quite susceptible to common antimycobacterial drugs in vitro. Most isolates were resistant to ethambutol and isoniazid, as has been described previously (24), and one-third were resistant to clofazimine. The use of acidic pH in susceptibility testing might influence the solubility, chemical structure, and activity of the investigated drug; and it has been shown previously that some drugs, e.g., clarithromycin, are less active at pH 6.0 (21). Results from studies with susceptible isolates of M. tuberculosis indicate that ethambutol and clofazimine are not active or are less active at pH 6.0, whereas isoniazid seems to retain its activity at pH 6.0. In conclusion, it is not possible to evaluate the susceptibility of M. genavense to ethambutol and clofazimine at pH 6.0. These results emphasize the need for standardization of susceptibility testing with NTM and the need for a correlation between results of in vitro susceptibility testing and clinical outcome.

Attempts for the identification of a reservoir for M. genavense have been made during the last few years. Although M. genavense was detected in birds in two studies (11, 20), the source of infection for humans and animals remains to be explained. In the Swiss cohort study (19), a reasonably high proportion of disseminated mycobacterial infections were caused by M. genavense. In addition, Dumonceau et al. (6) found that 40% of intestinal tissue specimens from patients with inflammatory and noninflammatory bowel disease were positive for M. genavense by PCR, suggesting a ubiquitous distribution of M. genavense. Subtyping methods like restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis or random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis with PCR might reveal a link between human, animal, and possible environmental strains of M. genavense in the future.

We conclude that patients with disseminated MAC and M. genavense infections have very similar clinical presentations. From the small number of patients that we studied, it seems that patients infected with M. genavense more frequently suffer from abdominal pain. Survival was similar for the two groups. A high rate of smear positivity was found for stool specimens from patients infected with M. genavense, although the culture results for these specimens were disappointing. For M. genavense, the shortest detection times and highest recovery rates by culture were observed with liver biopsy and bone marrow specimens. The use of liquid medium for primary culture and prolonged incubation is essential for culture of clinical specimens, and the use of an acidic culture medium can be expected to further improve recovery rates and reduce detection times.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the staff in the medical wards who allowed us access to the medical records. Åse Bengaard Andersen kindly looked up some of the clinical data. We gratefully acknowledge the dedicated efforts of the technologists in the Department of Mycobacteriology, especially Grethe Danielsen and Yrsa Pedersen.

Vibeke Østergaard Thomsen is supported by a grant from the Danish Research Academy. This work was partly supported by grants from the Danish Lung Association and the Faculty of Health Science at the University of Copenhagen, where Vibeke Østergaard Thomsen was a Ph.D. student at the time of this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bessesen M T, Shlay J, Stone Venohr B, Cohn D L, Reves R R. Disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection: clinical and microbiological features and response to therapy. AIDS. 1993;7:1357–1361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Böttger E C, Hirschel B, Coyle M B. Mycobacterium genavense sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1993;43:841–843. doi: 10.1099/00207713-43-4-841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Böttger E C, Teske A, Kirschner P, Bost S, Chang H R, Beer V, Hirschel B. Disseminated “Mycobacterium genavense” infection in patients with AIDS. Lancet. 1992;340:76–80. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90397-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coyle M B, Carlson L C, Wallis C K, Leonard R B, Raisys V A, Kilburn J O, Samadpour M, Böttger E C. Laboratory aspects of “Mycobacterium genavense,” a proposed species isolated from AIDS patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:3206–3212. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.12.3206-3212.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Department of Epidemiology, Statens Serum Institut. AIDS surveillance, quarterly report June 30. EPI-NEWS, week 37. Copenhagen, Denmark: Department of Epidemiology, Statens Serum Institut; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dumonceau J M, Van Gossum A, Adler M, Van Vooren J P, Fonteyne P A, De Beenhouwer H, Portaels F. Detection of fastidious mycobacteria in human intestines by the polymerase chain reaction. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997;16:358–363. doi: 10.1007/BF01726363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Evans K D, Nakasone A S, Sutherland P A, de la Maza L M, Peterson E M. Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium-M. intracellulare directly from primary BACTEC cultures by using acridinium-ester-labeled DNA probes. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:2427–2431. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.9.2427-2431.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gonzalez R, Hanna B A. Evaluation of Gen-Probe DNA hybridization systems for the identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1987;8:69–77. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(87)90152-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heifets L B, Good R C. Current laboratory methods for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. In: Bloom B R, editor. Tuberculosis: pathogenesis, protection, and control. Washington, D.C: ASM Press; 1994. pp. 85–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hirschel B, Chang H R, Mach N, Piguet P F, Cox J, Piguet J D, Silva M T, Larsson L, Klatser P R, Thole J E, et al. Fatal infection with a novel, unidentified Mycobacterium in a man with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:109–113. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199007123230207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hoop R K, Bottger E C, Ossent P, Salfinger M. Mycobacteriosis due to Mycobacterium genavense in six pet birds. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:990–993. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.4.990-993.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Horsburgh C R., Jr Mycobacterium avium complex infection in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1332–1338. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199105093241906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Horsburgh C R, Jr, Havlik J A, Ellis D A, Kennedy E, Fann S A, Dubois R E, Thompson S E. Survival of patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome and disseminated M. avium complex infection with and without antimycobacterial Chemotherapy. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991;144:577–559. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.3_Pt_1.557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jackson K, Sievers A, Ross B C, Dwyer B. Isolation of a fastidious Mycobacterium species from two AIDS patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:2934–2937. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.11.2934-2937.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kiehn T E, Edwards F F. Rapid identification using a specific DNA probe of Mycobacterium avium complex from patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:1551–1552. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.8.1551-1552.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kirschner P, Springer B, Vogel U, Meier A, Wrede A, Kiekenbeck M, Bange F-C, Böttger E C. Genotypic identification of mycobacteria by nucleic acid sequence determination: report of a 2-year experience in a clinical laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:2882–2889. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.11.2882-2889.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Maschek H, Georgii A, Schmidt R E, Kirschner P, Böttger E C. Mycobacterium genavense. Autopsy findings in three patients. Am J Clin Pathol. 1994;101:95–99. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/101.1.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nadal D, Caduff R, Kraft R, Salfinger M, Bodmer T, Kirschner P, Böttger E C, Schaad U B. Invasive infection with Mycobacterium genavense in three children with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993;12:37–43. doi: 10.1007/BF01997055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pechere M, Opravil M, Wald A, Chave J P, Bessesen M, Sievers A, Hein R, von Overbeck J, Clark R A, Tortoli E, et al. Clinical and epidemiologic features of infection with Mycobacterium genavense. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:400–404. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1995.00430040074009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Portaels F, Realini L, Bauwens L, Hirschel B, Meyers W M, de Meurichy W. Mycobacteriosis caused by Mycobacterium genavense in birds kept in a zoo: 11-year survey. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:319–323. doi: 10.1128/jcm.34.2.319-323.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rastogi N, Goh K S. Effect of pH on radiometric MICs of clarithromycin against 18 species of mycobacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:2841–2842. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.12.2841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Realini L, van der Stuyft P, de Ridder K, Hirschel B, Portaels F. Inhibitory effects of polyoxyethylene stearate, PANTA, and neutral pH on growth of Mycobacterium genavense in BACTEC primary cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:2791–2794. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.11.2791-2794.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shafran S D, Taylor G D, Talbot J A. Disseminated Mycobacterium genavense infection in Canadian AIDS patients. Tuber Lung Dis. 1995;76:168–170. doi: 10.1016/0962-8479(95)90562-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Siddiqi S H, Laszlo A, Butler W R, Kilburn J O. Bacteriologic investigations of unusual mycobacteria isolated from immunocompromised patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1993;16:321–323. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(93)90083-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Telenti A, Marchesi F, Balz M, Bally F, Böttger E C, Bodmer T. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:175–178. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.175-178.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tortoli E, Brunello F, Cagni A E, Colombrita D, Dionisio D, Grisendi L, Manfrin V, Moroni M, Tosi C P, Pinsi G, et al. Mycobacterium genavense in AIDS patients, report of 24 cases in Italy and review of the literature. Eur J Epidemiol. 1998;14:219–224. doi: 10.1023/a:1007401305708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Young L S, Inderlied C B, Berlin O G, Gottlieb M S. Mycobacterial infections in AIDS patients, with an emphasis on the Mycobacterium avium complex. Rev Infect Dis. 1986;8:1024–1033. doi: 10.1093/clinids/8.6.1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES