Abstract
Background
Because of limited infrastructure and skilled human capital, the etiology of meningitis is rarely identified in developing countries like Ethiopia. This results in unnecessary antibiotics use, economic crisis, hospitalization, and related nosocomial infections. Thus, we aimed to assess the epidemiology of human enteroviruses (HEVs) among clinically suspected meningitis cases in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Method
A cross-sectional study was conducted from January to August 2020 at selected Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was conducted on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) collected from 146 clinically suspected meningitis and bacterial culture-negative patients. SPSS v 21.0 was used for data analysis and bivariate correlation was done for the association between variables of interest.
Results
HEVs were detected in 39 (26.7%) of the 146 clinically suspected meningitis cases. Most of the HEVs cases 28 (71.9%) were detected in younger-aged infants less than 1 year. The most commonly observed clinical manifestations were vomiting (75.5%) followed by fever (56.8%) and impaired consciousness or irritability (50.7%). The mean length of hospital stay for patients with enteroviral meningitis was 9 days. Many patients with HEVs were recovered with sequelae (46.2%), and HEVs has contributed for one out of the nine meningeal deaths (11.1%).
Conclusions
HEVs were found to be the commonest cause of morbidity and mortality in all age groups. Many of the patients were mistreated with antibiotics and hospitalized. The detection of HEVs in 26.7% of clinically suspected meningitis cases indicated the need for molecular tests in investigating the etiology of meningitis. Therefore, we suggest the introduction of molecular tests as a routine practice in referral hospitals and the need to further characterize circulating HEVs strains.
Introduction
Viruses have emerged as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in all age groups under the era of declined incidence of bacterial meningitis [1, 2]. Human enteroviruses (HEVs) are the predominant cause of aseptic or viral meningitis globally. It accounts for more than half of all meningitis cases and affects all age groups, but infants and children are the most susceptible group [3–6]. Several studies conducted in different European and Asian countries estimated that 15% to 60% of viral meningitis cases were caused by non-polio human enteroviruses [7–10]. Unlike temperate region, in the tropical regions, HEVs associated with aseptic meningitis become incidents throughout the year without seasonal variation [11, 12].
In Africa, the poor resources and expense of diagnostic tests have constrained viral investigations. Hence, the exact disease burden and epidemiology of HEVs meningitis is not well known. Limited studies available thus far have assessed the extent of viral meningitis to vary between 8–65% of all meningitis cases [13–16]. Similarly, previous studies in Ethiopia estimated enteroviral meningitis to vary between 9% [17] and 12.8% [18]. This variation would be attributable to the spectrum of disease, seasonal distribution, age, immune status, and geographical locations of patients [19].
The overlapping clinical manifestations of meningitis caused by different etiologic agents, and the inability of clinical and routine laboratory investigation to distinguish bacterial from viral meningitis could result in misdiagnosis, mistreatment with antibiotics, and hospitalization. However, the advent of molecular techniques like RT-PCR has significantly improved the diagnosis of enteroviral meningitis, which subsequently reduces the use of antibiotics, decreases the length of stay in the hospital, and can help to prevent further spread of infection [20]. Early identification and differentiating viral from bacterial causes of meningitis is a critical step for improved management of patients. However, to the best of our knowledge, data regarding viral meningitis is lacking in Ethiopia. We, therefore, aimed to assess the epidemiology of HEVs meningitis among clinically suspected meningitis cases in selected hospitals.
Materials and methods
Study setting
A cross-sectional study was conducted from January-August 2020 in five public Hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: All Africa Leprosy Rehabilitation and Training Hospital (ALERT), Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH), Yekatit 12 Hospital, St. Peter’s Specialized Hospital, and St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC). All of the institutions are fully-fledged government-affiliated hospitals serving as referral hospitals for people who come from all over the country. The target populations of this study were suspected patients of all age and sex in the five public teaching and referral hospitals during the study period.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Aseptic/viral meningitis is a disease with acute onset of symptoms, obvious signs of meningeal involvement, and no growth on routine bacterial culture [21–23]. This study included patients who were clinically suspected of meningitis, negative for routine bacterial culture, and willing to participate in the study. Patients positive for routine bacterial culture were excluded.
Specimen collection
Cerebrospinal fluid was collected from 146 patients clinically suspected meningitis cases based on routine clinical practice, either at admission or later during the hospital stay. Routine diagnostic tests were conducted on all of the collected CSF samples. Leftover CSF samples were stored at -20°C and transported by dry ice to the Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI) for further investigation. The demographic and clinical data such as date of birth, gender, onset of illness, clinical presentation, laboratory findings of the blood and CSF tests, antimicrobial treatment administered, length of hospital stay and clinical outcomes were collected by physician and trained nurses.
Nucleic acid extraction and RT-PCR
Viral nucleic acid was extracted from 200 μl of CSF samples using DAAN Gene (Da An Gene Co., Ltd, of Sun Yat-Sen University, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Reverse transcription was conducted using HEVs specific reverse primer: PanEV2-5ʹNTR R: 5ʹ-CACCCAAAGTAGTC GGTTCCGC-3ʹ [24] in a 20 μL reaction mixture containing 6μl of RNase free water, 1μl of 5mM dNTP, 1 μl of 2uM EV reverse primer, 5μl RNA template, 4μl of 10x SSV buffer, 1μl 10unit/μl RNase inhibitor, 1μl of 100mM DTT and 1μl of superscript IV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, USA). The mixture was incubated at 50 0C for 10 minutes to synthesis cDNA, and the reaction was inactivated by incubating at 80°C for 10 minutes. The cDNA product was then amplified using conventional PCR consisting of 10 μl of hot star master mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 0.5 μl each of forward (PanEV2-5ʹNTR F: 5’CAT GGT GCG AAG AGT CGA TTG A3’) and reverse (PanEV2-5ʹNTR R) primer: 4μl of molecular grade water, and 5μl cDNA template; with final reaction volume of 20μl to get an amplicon size of 144bp. The amplification was done for initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 minutes, then 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 seconds, followed by annealing at 60°C for 60 seconds, and extension at 60°C for 60 seconds. PCR products were visualized on a 2% agarose gel. This protocol was modified from a recently published article [18].
Quality control
The quality of data was ensured through pretesting of the data collection sheet, proper training of data collectors, and sticking to SOPs of the AHRI molecular laboratory. NATrol™ EV (Enterovirus) (Helvetica Health Care, Geneva, Switzerland) and RNase/DNase free water was used as positive and negative test control, respectively.
Statistical analysis
Data entry and analysis were done using SPSS version 21.0 statistical software. Binary logistic regression was conducted for statistical associations between variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ethical issues
The study protocol has been approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College (SPHMMC) (Pm23/423), and by the collaborative Ethical Review Committee of Armauer Hanson Research Institute (AHRI) and All Africa Leprosy Rehabilitation and Training Hospital (ALERT) (AAERC) (PO/04/20). Support letter/ official permission letter was obtained from each health facility. A written informed consent/assent was obtained from study participants, and parents or guardians of children, before including them in the study. The study participants right to refuse or not give CSF samples without affecting their routine medical services were also granted. Samples were coded to keep the confidentiality of the study participants’ personal information.
Result
Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics
A total of 146 clinically suspected meningitis cases with negative bacterial cultures were enrolled in this study. The male to female proportion was 1.2:1, which indicates that cases were distributed nearly equally regardless of gender. The mean (± standard deviation) age of the study participants was 7±14 years, ranging from one day to 74 years. More than two-thirds of patients were under one year old, including 39.0% neonates (age < 28 days), and 28.1% infants aged between 29 days to one year (Table 1). Overall, HEVs were detected in 39 (26.7%) of the total 146 study participants who were clinically suspected of meningitis and negative for routine bacterial culture. HEVs were detected mostly (67.1%) from infants aged less than one year.
Table 1. Bivariate analysis of socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with HEVs positivity at selected hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| Characteristics (n = 146) | Freq. N (%) | HEVs+ No (%) | COR (95%CI) | P- value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Female | 66(45.2%) | 20(51.3%) | 1.396(0.669,2.912) | 0.374 |
| Male | 80(54.8%) | 19(48.7%) | 1 | ||
| Age (years) | <28 days | 57(39.0%) | 16(41.0%) | 2.927(0.600,14.274) | 0.184 |
| 30days-1 year | 41(28.1%) | 12(30.8%) | 3.103(0.613,15.706) | 0.171 | |
| 1–5 | 13(9%) | 5(12.9%) | 4.687(0.736,29.834) | 0.102 | |
| 6–14 | 14(9.6%) | 2(5.1%) | 1.250(0.153,10.226) | 0.835 | |
| 15–18 | 4(2.7%) | 2(5.1%) | 7.500(0.645,87.193) | 0.107 | |
| >18 | 17(11.6%) | 2(5.1%) | 1 | ||
| Antibiotics use before LP | No | 82(56.2%) | 26(66.7%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 64(43.8%) | 13(33.3%) | 0.549(0.255,1.181) | 0.125 | |
| Fever | No | 63(43.2%) | 18(46.2%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 83(56.8%) | 21(53.8%) | 0.847(0.405,1.770) | 0.658 | |
| Headache | No | 105(71.9%) | 29(74.4%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 41(28.1%) | 10(25.6%) | 0.845(0.368,1.941) | 0.692 | |
| Impaired consciousness | No | 72 (49.3%) | 16(41%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 74 (50.7%) | 23(59.0%) | 1.578(0.751,3.316) | 0.228 | |
| Vomiting | No | 36 (24.7%) | 6(15.4%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 110 (75.3%) | 33(84.6%) | 2.143(0.815,5.634) | 0.122 | |
| Stiffness | No | 109 (74.7%) | 27(69.2%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 37 (25.3%) | 12(31.8%) | 1.458(0.646,3.291) | 0.364 | |
| Photophobia | No | 120 (82.2%) | 31(79.5%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 26 (17.8%) | 8(20.5%) | 1.276(0.505,3.227) | 0.607 | |
| Seizure attack | No | 112 (76.7%) | 30(77.0%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 34 (23.3%) | 9(23.0%) | 1.038(0.434,2.483) | 0.934 | |
| Dizziness | No | 119(81.5%) | 28(71.8%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 27 (19.5%) | 11(28.2%) | 2.234(0.930,5.369) | 0.072 | |
| Rash | No | 137 (93.8%) | 36(92.3%) | 1 | |
| Yes | 9 (6.2%) | 3(7.7%) | 1.403(0.333,5.904) | 0.644 | |
| Outcome | Dead | 9(6.2) | 1(2.5%) | 0.625(0.048,8.201) | 0.720 |
| Discharged | 29(19.9) | 6(15.4%) | 1.304(0.223,7.613) | 0.768 | |
| Fully recovered | 48(32.9) | 12(30.8%) | 1.667(0.319,8.703) | 0.545 | |
| Recovered with sequelae* | 48(32.9) | 18(46.2%) | 3.000(0.590,15.262) | 0.186 | |
| Transferred | 12(8.2) | 2(5.1%) | 1 | ||
| Hospital stays | <5days | 29 (19.9%) | 1(2.5%) | 1.080(0.292,3.989) | .908 |
| 6–10 days | 39 (26.7%) | 6(15.4%) | 1.200(0.348,4.137) | .773 | |
| 11-15days | 47 (32.2%) | 12(30.8%) | 0.568(0.159,2.027) | .384 | |
| 16-20days | 14 (9.6%) | 18(46.2%) | 0.655(0.126,3.404) | .614 | |
| >21days | 17 (11.6%) | 2(5.1%) | 1 |
Fever, temperature ≥ 38°C; COR, crude odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; Abcs, Antibiotics; LP, lumbar puncture.
*Meningitis related complications including hearing loss, cognitive impairment, and recurrent seizures.
Vomiting or reduced ability to suck 33 (84.6%), impaired consciousness 23 (59.0%), and fever 21 (53.8%) were the most common clinical presentations among positive cases at admission to the hospitals. Many of the patients had a history of prior antibiotics use before the spinal tap and were also hospitalized for 5–15 days. According to this finding, 39 (26.7%) of patients were mistreated with antibiotics for bacteria where the actual etiologies were HEVs. Regarding the clinical outcome of patients with HEVs infection; more than 46% of patients recovered with sequelae, followed by full recovery (30.8%). A total of 9 patients died of meningitis, of which 1 death was attributable to HEVs. Interestingly, none of the demographics, clinical, and laboratory findings has shown an association with HEVs positivity (p>0.05) (Table 1).
Laboratory findings of study participants
The white blood cells (WBC) count for newborns 7640 to 22160 cells/mm3, children 5000 to 14,000/ mm3, and children over 7 years and adults 3500–10,500 cells/mm3 was considered as a normal reference range [25–28]. In this study, WBC was performed for about 88% (n = 128) of the study participants. The mean WBC count of study participants was 12980 cells/mm3, ranging from 1800 to 66,500 cells/mm3. Relatively a higher WBC count of 20 (51.3%) was observed among HEVs positive cases. Among HEVs positive cases, the majority 30 (77.0%) of CSF samples appeared clear. Astonishingly, none of the laboratory finding was statistically correlated with HEVs meningitis (S1 Table).
Discussion
Human enteroviruses remain the most common causes of aseptic meningitis [13, 29] varying between 6% and 64% worldwide [30]. However, viral etiologies of meningitis are rarely identified in developing countries like Ethiopia owing to a lack of advanced laboratory settings. In this study, we investigate enteroviral meningitis in five public teaching hospitals using molecular diagnostic techniques. We found that 39 (26.7%) of the clinically suspected meningitis cases are due to HEVs infection.
Although the distribution of HEVs meningitis is likely to vary between age groups, our finding was consistent with the finding in Kuwait (24%) [31] and old study in Belgium (27.1%) [7]. However, compare to the findings in Athens (48.9%) [32], France (43.4%) [33], Ireland (61.9%) [23], South Korea (38.4%) [8], Iran (65%) [34] and Egypt (56%) [13], the prevalence in the present study was relatively lower. Nevertheless, the burden of HEVs meningitis in this study was higher compared to findings in USA (12.1%) [35], Cyprus (11.1%) [11], Brazil (15.8%) [36], China (19.2%) [37], and Palestine (18.5%) [30]. This discrepancy could be explained by the difference in age of patients, population location, and seasonal distribution of cases [19, 30, 31, 34].
In Africa, the incidence of aseptic or viral meningitis was shown to vary between 8% in Malawi [15] and 56% in Egypt [13]. The current finding also enlightens this fact. But our result was higher compared to some of the studies in African settings: Uganda (5.9%) [38], Tunisia (9.8%) [16] and South Africa (17%) [9] and to the previous studies in Ethiopia, 9% [17] and 12.8% [18]. The difference might be due to variation in clinical diagnosis, geography, type of study participants, sample size, age, molecular methods used in extraction or amplification [17, 35, 37].
Human enteroviruses remain the commonest causes of childhood meningitis globally [39, 40], and being a young age was reported as an important contributing factor for having viral meningitis [40]. Our study showed that majority of infants (72%) aged less than one year were more susceptible to HEVs meningitis, although it’s statistically insignificant. This finding was in agreement with studies in Iran [41], Palestine [30], China [37], and Ethiopia [17, 18], which showed that younger aged patients were more affected with enteroviral meningitis. The possible justification for this finding could be the less developed immune system in neonates and infants, which makes them more susceptible to enteroviral infections [30].
It is well noted that sex can be an important biological variable in the immune response to infectious diseases. In the present study, the significance of sex with enteroviral meningitis was assessed. Although the association was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05), more than half (51.3%) of positive cases were females regardless of the higher proportion of males. This result was contradictory to the study found in Palestine, where about two-thirds of positive cases were males [30].
Diagnosis of meningitis based on clinical criteria is very challenging in distinguishing viral from bacterial meningitis due to the overlapping symptoms [6, 20]. This made 26.7% of our patients be treated with antibiotics inappropriately instead of giving supportive care. In the present study, vomiting (75.3%), fever (57.5%), and impaired consciousness (50.7%) were the predominant clinical manifestations. This is in agreement with the study in Greece [32], China [37], South Korea [8], and Egypt [13] where fever, headache, and vomiting were the most common clinical symptoms in the majority of patients.
For a definitive diagnosis of meningitis, analysis of CSF is useful in distinguishing some of the etiologic organisms. In the current study, 77% of CSF appeared clear as expected in viral meningitis [42]. However, turbidity does not guarantee the absence of viral etiologies. In this study, 15.3% of HEVs were recovered in turbid CSF, and CSF pleocytosis was noted only in 12.9% of confirmed HEVs cases. Such findings were in line with other studies from South Korea [43], Palestine [30], Canada [44], and Iran [41]. Regarding the outcome of HEVs positive patients, many were recovered with sequelae (46.2%), with only one death registered. The proportion of death possibly attributed to HEVs was 11.1% (1/9). The difference in demographic, clinical, and laboratory findings was not statistically significant in our study (p > 0.05) similar to study elsewhere [13].
To our knowledge, this study is the first to report molecular methods for meningitis diagnosis by involving multicenter health institution in Ethiopia. The high rate of HEVs detection among clinically suspected meningitis cases indicated that the worth of molecular tests in identifying viral etiologies of meningitis. Therefore, we suggest the application of molecular tests as a routine practice in referral hospitals in Ethiopia and also the need of further study to the circulating HEVs. We also recommended further surveillance study to investigate the burden of HEVs at the national level.
Limitation of the study
This study was limited to HEVs and missed other important viral etiologies of meningitis. So that we were unable to determine the proportions HEVs relative to other pathogens.
Supporting information
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We would like to forward our gratitude to patients and/or their guardians, hospitals staffs, the SPHMMC, and AHRI staffs particularly the molecular laboratory staff.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript.
Funding Statement
The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.McIntyre PB, O’Brien KL, Greenwood B, Van De Beek D (2012) Effect of vaccines on bacterial meningitis worldwide. The Lancet 380: 1703–1711. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61187-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.McGill F, Griffiths MJ, Solomon T (2017) Viral meningitis: current issues in diagnosis and treatment. Current opinion in infectious diseases 30: 248–256. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kumar R (2005) Aseptic Meningitis Diagnosis and Managemen. Indian J Pediatr 72: 57–63. doi: 10.1007/BF02760582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tan NW, Lee EY, Khoo GM, Tee NW, Krishnamoorthy S, et al. (2016) Cerebrospinal fluid white cell count: discriminatory or otherwise for enteroviral meningitis in infants and young children? J Neurovirol 22: 213–217. doi: 10.1007/s13365-015-0387-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lee BE, Davies HD (2007) Aseptic meningitis. Current opinion in infectious diseases 20: 272–277. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3280ad4672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Logan SA, MacMahon E (2008) Viral meningitis. Bmj 336: 36–40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39409.673657.AE [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Verstrepen WA, Kuhn S, Kockx MM, Van De Vyvere ME, Mertens AH (2001) Rapid detection of enterovirus RNA in cerebrospinal fluid specimens with a novel single-tube real-time reverse transcription-PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 39: 4093–4096. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4093-4096.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Han SH, Choi HY, Kim JM, Park KR, Youn YC, et al. (2016) Etiology of aseptic meningitis and clinical characteristics in immune-competent adults. J Med Virol 88: 175–179. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Archimbaud C, Chambon M, Bailly JL, Petit I, Henquell C, et al. (2009) Impact of rapid enterovirus molecular diagnosis on the management of infants, children, and adults with aseptic meningitis. J Med Virol 81: 42–48. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ai J, Xie Z, Liu G, Chen Z, Yang Y, et al. (2017) Etiology and prognosis of acute viral encephalitis and meningitis in Chinese children: a multicentre prospective study. BMC Infect Dis 17: 494. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2572-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Richter J, Tryfonos C, Christodoulou C (2019) Molecular epidemiology of enteroviruses in Cyprus 2008–2017. PLoS One 14: e0220938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zaoutis T, Klein JD (1998) Enterovirus infections. Pediatrics in review 19: 183–191. doi: 10.1542/pir.19-6-183 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shaker OG, Abdelhamid N (2015) Detection of enteroviruses in pediatric patients with aseptic meningitis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 129: 67–71. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Smuts H, Cronje S, Thomas J, Brink D, Korsman S, et al. (2018) Molecular characterization of an outbreak of enterovirus-associated meningitis in Mossel Bay, South Africa, December 2015-January 2016. BMC Infect Dis 18: 709. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3641-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Benjamin LA, Kelly M, Cohen D, Neuhann F, Galbraith S, et al. (2013) Detection of herpes viruses in the cerebrospinal fluid of adults with suspected viral meningitis in Malawi. Infection 41: 27–31. doi: 10.1007/s15010-012-0292-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Othman I, Volle R, Elargoubi A, Guediche MN, Chakroun M, et al. (2016) Enterovirus meningitis in Tunisia (Monastir, Mahdia, 2011–2013): identification of virus variants cocirculating in France. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 84: 116–122. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.10.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bårnes GK, Gudina EK, Berhane M, Abdissa A, Tesfaw G, et al. (2018) New molecular tools for meningitis diagnostics in Ethiopia–a necessary step towards improving antimicrobial prescription. BMC infectious diseases 18: 684. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3589-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Geteneh A, Kassa T, Alemu D, Kiros M, Andualem H, et al. (2021) Viral Etiologies of Meningitis in Patients with Presumed Pyogenic Meningitis at University Hospitals in Ethiopia. Infection and Drug Resistance 14: 1083. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S304521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kaminski M, Grummel V, Hoffmann D, Berthele A, Hemmer B (2017) The spectrum of aseptic central nervous system infections in southern Germany–demographic, clinical and laboratory findings. European Journal of Neurology 24: 1062–1070. doi: 10.1111/ene.13335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jin D, Heo TH, Byeon JH, Kim G-H, Kim MK, et al. (2015) Analysis of clinical information and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for early diagnosis of enteroviral meningitis. Korean journal of pediatrics 58: 446. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2015.58.11.446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wright WF, Pinto CN, Palisoc K, Baghli S (2019) Viral (aseptic) meningitis: A review. J Neurol Sci 398: 176–183. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.01.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tattevin P, Tchamgoue S, Belem A, Benezit F, Pronier C, et al. (2019) Aseptic meningitis. Rev Neurol (Paris) 175: 475–480. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2019.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kelly TA, O’Lorcain P, Moran J, Garvey P, McKeown P, et al. (2013) Underreporting of viral encephalitis and viral meningitis, Ireland, 2005–2008. Emerging infectious diseases 19: 1428. doi: 10.3201/eid1909.130201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pabbaraju K, Wong S, Wong AA, Tellier R (2015) Detection of enteroviruses and parechoviruses by a multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay. Molecular and cellular probes 29: 81–85. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2015.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mengistu Sissay T, Tibebu M, Wasihun T, Tsegaye A (2021) Hematological reference intervals for adult population of Dire Dawa town, East Ethiopia. Plos one 16: e0244314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tiruneh T, Kiros T, Getu S (2020) Hematological reference intervals among full-term newborns in Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC pediatrics 20: 1–6. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1898-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Gomani P, Matubu AT, Mujuru HA, Munjoma MW, Tinago W, et al. (2015) Hematological and biochemical laboratory reference intervals for Zimbabwean adolescents. Clin Lab 61: 101–111. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2014.140506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang X, Ding Y, Zhang Y, Xing J, Dai Y, et al. (2019) Age‐and sex‐specific reference intervals for hematologic analytes in Chinese children. International journal of laboratory hematology 41: 331–337. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.12979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McGill F, Griffiths MJ, Bonnett LJ, Geretti AM, Michael BD, et al. (2018) Incidence, aetiology, and sequelae of viral meningitis in UK adults: a multicentre prospective observational cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 18: 992–1003. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30245-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dumaidi K, Al-Jawabreh A (2017) Molecular detection and genotyping of enteroviruses from CSF samples of patients with suspected sepsis-like illness and/or aseptic meningitis from 2012 to 2015 in West Bank, Palestine. PLoS One 12: e0172357. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dalwai A, Ahmad S, Al-Nakib W (2010) Echoviruses are a major cause of aseptic meningitis in infants and young children in Kuwait. Virol J 7: 236. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-7-236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Michos AG, Syriopoulou VP, Hadjichristodoulou C, Daikos GL, Lagona E, et al. (2007) Aseptic meningitis in children: analysis of 506 cases. PLoS One 2: e674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jarrin I, Sellier P, Lopes A, Morgand M, Makovec T, et al. (2016) Etiologies and Management of Aseptic Meningitis in Patients Admitted to an Internal Medicine Department. Medicine (Baltimore) 95: e2372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Izadi A, Rahbarimanesh AA, Mojtahedi Y, Mojtahedi SY (2018) Prevalence of Enterovirus Meningitis in Children: Report from a Tertiary Center. Mædica 13: 213. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2018.13.3.213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Messacar K, Breazeale G, Wei Q, Robinson CC, Dominguez SR (2015) Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of infants with human parechovirus or human herpes virus-6 detected in cerebrospinal fluid tested for enterovirus or herpes simplex virus. J Med Virol 87: 829–835. doi: 10.1002/jmv.24119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dos Santos GP, Skraba I, Oliveira D, Lima AA, de Melo MM, et al. (2006) Enterovirus meningitis in Brazil, 1998–2003. J Med Virol 78: 98–104. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tao Z, Wang H, Li Y, Liu G, Xu A, et al. (2014) Molecular epidemiology of human enterovirus associated with aseptic meningitis in Shandong Province, China, 2006–2012. PloS one 9: e89766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Page AL, Boum Ii Y, Kemigisha E, Salez N, Nanjebe D, et al. (2017) Aetiology and Outcomes of Suspected Infections of the Central Nervous System in Children in Mbarara, Uganda. Sci Rep 7: 2728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-02741-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Martin NG, Iro MA, Sadarangani M, Goldacre R, Pollard AJ, et al. (2016) Hospital admissions for viral meningitis in children in England over five decades: a population-based observational study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 16: 1279–1287. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30201-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rudolph H, Schroten H, Tenenbaum T (2016) Enterovirus Infections of the Central Nervous System in Children: An Update. Pediatr Infect Dis J 35: 567–569. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shahroodi MJG, Ghazvini K, Sadeghi R, Sasan MS (2016) Enteroviral Meningitis in neonates and children of Mashhad, Iran. Jundishapur journal of microbiology 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hristea A, Olaru I, Baicus C, Moroti R, Arama V, et al. (2012) Clinical prediction rule for differentiating tuberculous from viral meningitis. The International journal of tuberculosis and lung disease 16: 793–798. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.11.0687 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yun KW, Choi EH, Cheon DS, Lee J, Choi CW, et al. (2012) Enteroviral meningitis without pleocytosis in children. Archives of disease in childhood 97: 874–878. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-301884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lee BE, Chawla R, Langley JM, Forgie SE, Al-Hosni M, et al. (2006) Paediatric Investigators Collaborative Network on Infections in Canada (PICNIC) study of aseptic meningitis. BMC infectious diseases 6: 68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(DOCX)
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript.
