Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2021 Oct 12;13(10):e18723. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18723

COVID-19-Induced Cavitary Lesion: A Rare Presentation

Steven Douedi 1,, Sydney Kauffman 2, Mohammed AlAzzawi 1, Swapnil V Patel 1, Ahmad Abu 3
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC8585239  PMID: 34790478

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in widespread infection with significant morbidity and mortality. Primarily involving the respiratory system, COVID-19 has also been known to cause systemic findings. Cavitary lesions in the setting of COVID-19 have been rarely reported in literature and the treatment and management of these lesions are poorly understood and defined. We present a case of a patient with a history of COVID-19 infection found to have cavitary lesions, eventually improving with supportive care. While our patient showed marked improvement with observation, more extensive studies and patient populations are needed to guide clinicians and cavitary lesion management in the setting of COVID-19.

Keywords: severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, hemoptysis, cavitary, pneumonia, covid-19

Introduction

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been recognized as a devastating pandemic leading to sequelae of various organ system involvement. Until now, COVID-19 has infected over 195 million individuals and led to over 4 million deaths globally [1]. Identified as an enveloped, non-segmented positive-sense RNA virus belonging to the beta-coronaviridae family, various pharmaceutical companies have developed an mRNA-based vaccine of which over 3.8 billion individuals have received according to the World Health Organization [1,2]. Known to primarily involve the respiratory system, several meta-analyses have reported common findings on chest computed tomography scans such as peripheral ground-glass opacities, air bronchograms, linear opacities, consolidation, and in late stages traction bronchiectasis [3,4]. Rarely, reports and literature have described an association between COVID-19 infection and the development of cavitary lesions [5,6]. We report a case of an otherwise healthy male with a history of COVID-19 infection presenting with hemoptysis and ultimately found to have multiple cavitary lesions associated with COVID-19.

Case presentation

A 43-year-old male with a medical history of Hashimoto's thyroiditis and COVID-19 infection diagnosed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) four months prior to admission presented to the office with complaints of hemoptysis. During his COVID-19 infection, his primary symptoms were a non-productive cough without shortness of breath or hypoxia, for which he was treated supportively. He denied any other complaints; including fevers, chills, shortness of breath, hematuria, occult blood in his stool, weight loss, or night sweats. He also denied any recent travel or sick contacts. Computed tomography (CT) angiography of the chest obtained during his initial infection four months prior showed multifocal patchy infiltrates with a slight mosaic pattern but no noted cavitary lesion (Figure 1).

Figure 1. CTA of the chest.

Figure 1

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan of the chest showing multifocal patchy infiltrates with slight mosaic pattern but no noted cavitary lesion.

He remained hemodynamically stable and was advised to follow up with a pulmonologist at that time however was lost to follow up. Six months after his initial presentation, he presented to the outpatient office again with complaints of hemoptysis without any associated symptoms. A repeat CT scan of the chest was obtained showing multiple cavities in the right upper and middle lobe (Figure 2).

Figure 2. CT scan of the chest.

Figure 2

CT scan of the chest showing scattered reticular, ground-glass, atelectatic and fibrotic changes again seen in both lungs. These are slightly worsened compared to Figure 1 especially in the right upper lobe where there is a groundglass patchy infiltrate of 5 cm in size with associated new cavity of 2 cm in the right middle lobe (blue arrow). 

Laboratory findings at this visit including complete blood count, complete metabolic panel, antinuclear antibody, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, and QuantiFERON were within normal limits. He was evaluated by the pulmonary team and a bronchoscopy was performed. Bacterial, acid-fast, and fungal cultures were obtained and showed no growth. Bronchoalveolar lavage and cytology showed no abnormalities. He was advised to continue close follow-ups and, one month later, the patient's hemoptysis had resolved. A treatment plan was made to perform routine serial CT scans to monitor for growth or progression of cavitary lesions. Two months after his initial presentation, a repeat CT scan of the chest showed resolving ground-glass opacities and significant improvement of nodules (Figure 3). 

Figure 3. CT scan of the chest on follow-up.

Figure 3

CT chest showing persistent however slightly improved patchy ground-glass opacities seen throughout the lower lobes (panel A and B). The ground-glass upper lobe opacities have improved however there is a persistent 4 mm right upper lobe nodule (blue arrow in panel B).

Discussion

Chest computed tomography scan has been found to be the most helpful for diagnosis, management, and follow-up of COVID-19 due to its high sensitivity at nearly 97% [7]. Thus far, the most common findings of COVID-19 on chest CT are ground-glass opacities, vessel enlargement, consolidation, air bronchograms, and bronchiectasis found in late stages of disease [8]. Our literature search found that cavitations were a very uncommon finding on chest CT in the setting of COVID-19 infections [5,6]. More specifically, many studies reported a temporal change in chest CT findings in follow-up examinations, including a transition from isolated ground glass opacities to a superimposition of ground-glass opacities with cavitation over time [9]. 

Another study looking at 104 symptomatic patients with COVID-19 from seven isolation centers was retrospectively analyzed in early 2020 and showed that 1% of their patients showed cavitations on chest CT imaging [10]. Hugo et al. discovered that 28 studies comprising 3,466 patients showed 0.7% of patients had cavitation found on chest CT [11]. The patient presented in our case did not have the typical findings of COVID-19 on imaging defined in the literature. The cavitary lesions seen in our patient were thoroughly worked up to find the underlying etiology, consistent with the more common causes of cavitary lesions such as mycobacterium, infectious, parasitic, or autoimmune [5]. Given the extensive yet unremarkable work-up for the cavitary lesion etiology, COVID-19 appeared to be the most probable cause. 

The pathophysiology of cavitary lesions in the lung has been well described in the literature. In other disease processes, these lesions are suspected to be primarily due to underlying various types of necrosis or malignancy [12]. In post-mortem analysis of COVID-19-infected patients with cavitary lesions, diffuse alveolar damage or intra-alveolar hemorrhage and necrosis have been implied as possible causes. However, this is still unknown and poorly understood [5,13]. 

Conclusions

Although this finding is rare, it is still important to understand the implications of this finding on chest CT and define a possible course of management. As of now, these cavitary lesions have been managed conservatively. Further studies are needed, and patients with cavitary lesions due to COVID-19 infection should be closely monitored. This case will hopefully contribute to the constantly growing and changing knowledge we have about the COVID-19 virus and its consequences in our patients.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. [ Jul; 2021 ];https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 2021 29:2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19): a case report and review of treatments. Douedi S, Miskoff J. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Meta-analysis of chest CT features of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Zheng Y, Wang L, Ben S. J Med Virol. 2021;93:241–249. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.A systematic review of chest imaging findings in COVID-19. Sun Z, Zhang N, Li Y, Xu X. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020;10:1058–1079. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lung cavitation due to COVID-19 pneumonia. Selvaraj V, Dapaah-Afriyie K. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13 doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-237245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pulmonary cavitation: an under-recognized late complication of severe COVID-19 lung disease. Zoumot Z, Bonilla MF, Wahla AS, et al. BMC Pulm Med. 2021;21:24. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01379-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases. Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, et al. Radiology. 2020;296:0–40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Typical and atypical COVID-19 computed tomography findings. Caruso D, Polidori T, Guido G, et al. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8:3177–3187. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i15.3177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review of imaging findings in 919 patients. Salehi S, Abedi A, Balakrishnan S, Gholamrezanezhad A. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215:87–93. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pattern and age distribution of COVID-19 on pulmonary computed tomography. Sultan OM, Alghazali DM, Al-Tameemi H, et al. Curr Med Imaging. 2021;17:775–780. doi: 10.2174/1573405616666201223144539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chest CT imaging signature of coronavirus disease 2019 infection: in pursuit of the scientific evidence. Adams HJ, Kwee TC, Yakar D, Hope MD, Kwee RM. Chest. 2020;158:1885–1895. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cavitary pulmonary disease. Gadkowski LB, Stout JE. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21:305–333. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00060-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Postmortem examination of COVID-19 patients reveals diffuse alveolar damage with severe capillary congestion and variegated findings in lungs and other organs suggesting vascular dysfunction. Menter T, Haslbauer JD, Nienhold R, et al. Histopathology. 2020;77:198–209. doi: 10.1111/his.14134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES