Abstract
Background and Objectives
To determine the role of complement in the disease pathology of multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), we investigated complement activation, and inhibition, on binding of MMN patient-derived immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies in an induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived motor neuron (MN) model for MMN.
Methods
iPSC-derived MNs were characterized for the expression of complement receptors and membrane-bound regulators, for the binding of circulating IgM anti-GM1 from patients with MMN, and for subsequent fixation of C4 and C3 on incubation with fresh serum. The potency of ARGX-117, a novel inhibitory monoclonal antibody targeting C2, to inhibit fixation of complement was assessed.
Results
iPSC-derived MNs moderately express the complement regulatory proteins CD46 and CD55 and strongly expressed CD59. Furthermore, MNs express C3aR, C5aR, and complement receptor 1. IgM anti-GM1 antibodies in serum from patients with MMN bind to MNs and induce C3 and C4 fixation on incubation with fresh serum. ARGX-117 inhibits complement activation downstream of C4 induced by patient-derived anti-GM1 antibodies bound to MNs.
Discussion
Binding of IgM antibodies from patients with MMN to iPSC-derived MNs induces complement activation. By expressing complement regulatory proteins, particularly CD59, MNs are protected against complement-mediated lysis. Yet, because of expressing C3aR, the function of these cells may be affected by complement activation upstream of membrane attack complex formation. ARGX-117 inhibits complement activation upstream of C3 in this disease model for MMN and therefore represents an intervention strategy to prevent harmful effects of complement in MMN.
Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare chronic, presumably inflammatory, pure motor polyneuropathy leading to slowly progressive muscle weakness, mainly of the hands and forearms and lower legs.1,2 Specific pathophysiologic characteristics of MMN include the presence of immunoglobulin M (IgM) autoantibodies against the ganglioside GM1 and conduction block, i.e., impaired propagation of action potentials along the axon. GM1 is widely expressed in the nervous system by neurons, particularly around the nodes of Ranvier, and Schwann cells (SCs).3-5 Whether MMN is primarily a demyelinating or axonal neuropathy has been debated. Initial reports included the presence of demyelination and axonal degeneration in damaged nerves, but the number of pathologic studies is limited, and their results are inconsistent. The prevailing view is currently that GM1 antibodies target the axolemma at nodes of Ranvier. This is thought to interfere with axon–Schwann cell interactions, causing widening of the node and axonal damage.1,2,6 Presence and titers of IgM anti-GM1 antibodies, as well as their complement activating properties, correlate with clinical features such as weakness and axonal damage.7 Moreover, the binding of anti-GM1 IgM from patients to motor neurons (MNs) derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and subsequent activation of the classical complement pathway causes disturbed calcium homeostasis and structural damage of these cells in vitro resembling changes occurring in MMN.8 These findings suggest a central role of IgM anti-GM1 and complement targeting to motor axons in the etiology of MMN.
High-dose IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment is the only approved treatment for MMN, with subcutaneous Ig as an alternative.9,10 This treatment often improves muscle strength—but needs to be repeated regularly in the short term—and is less effective at preventing progression of axonal loss in the long term.1,11 The immunomodulatory effects of high-dose IVIg include the inhibition of the classical pathway of the complement system, which is the main effector mechanism of IgM antibodies.12 Therefore, it can be postulated that IgM anti-GM1 antibodies bound to the axolemma disturb the function of MNs by classical pathway activation and the subsequent formation of C3 and C5 convertases and formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC).13
We hypothesize that targeting the classical complement pathway is a potential therapeutic approach in MMN. We investigated the interaction of circulating anti-GM1 IgM from patients with MMN with complement in detail using iPSC-derived MNs. In this disease model for MMN, we evaluated the effects of ARGX-117, a novel monoclonal antibody that inhibits complement factor C2.
Methods
Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents
This study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the UMC Utrecht for both the generation of iPSC-derived MNs (METC protocol nr: NL39918.041.12) and the collection of MMN patient material (METC protocol nr: 14-528). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Patients and Controls
Blood samples were obtained from patients who met the diagnostic consensus criteria for MMN14 (eTable 1, links.lww.com/NXI/A652). All patients received IVIg therapy at sampling. Routine clinical evaluation of patients with MMN includes measurement of circulating IgM antibodies against GM1 with ELISA.15 Titers of anti-GM1 antibodies used for the present study were obtained from the clinical records. In case this titer had not been measured at the same day as the blood sample used for the present study had been collected, the titer determined at the most nearby time point was used. Blood samples from healthy volunteers were collected via the in-house donor facility of the UMC Utrecht. Serum samples were heat inactivated (30 minutes 56°C) and stored in aliquots at −80°C until used.
Antibodies and Reagents
ARGX-117 is a humanized, Fc-engineered human IgG1 inhibitory anti-C2 antibody in development by argenx. Its characterization is described elsewhere.16 The commercial antibodies used are given in the online supplement. Other reagents were cholera toxin B subunit-AF488 (Thermo Fisher, #C34775, 1:500), complement-active human pooled serum (Innovative Research), complement-active C2-depleted serum (Complement Technology), purified human serum C2 (Complement Technology), EDTA (Riedel de Haen), MgEGTA (Complement Technology), and veronal buffered saline, pH 7.4 (VB, Lonza).
iPSC-Derived MNs and sNF96.2 Cell Line
Human iPSC lines derived from fibroblasts by lentiviral reprogramming passed tests for mycoplasma infection, chromosomal aberrations, and pluripotency and were cultured maximum 60 passages.8,17 iPSCs were cultured and differentiated into MNs according to adapted protocols as described previously.8,18,19 In summary, iPSCs were aggregated into embryoid bodies and exposed to dual SMAD inhibition, retinoic acid, and smoothened agonist. The embryoid bodies were then dissociated and plated in single cell suspension on PDL-laminin coated coverslips and cocultured with mouse glia in neuronal medium containing neurotrophic factors brain-derived neurotrophic factor, glial cell–derived neurotrophic factor, and ciliary neurotrophic factor. In agreement with previous publications, the resulting neuronal cultures consisted of up to 50% of MNs, as identified by the expression of MN markers FoxP1, ChAT, and Isl1.8,18,19 Despite this heterogeneity of MN cultures, GM1 expression assessed with its high-affinity ligand cholera toxin subunit B was uniform and present on all cells.
The Schwann cell line sNF96.2 (ATCC, CRL-2884) was derived from a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor and found positive for cytoplasmic Schwann cell markers S100 and p75. Cholera toxin B subunit confirmed GM1 expression. Cells were cultured in T75 or T175 flasks (Greiner) in DMEM medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin (both from Life Technologies), and 10%, v/v, fetal calf serum (FCS; Bodinco) at 37°C at 5%, v/v, CO2. Cells were passaged or collected for experiments twice weekly, when confluency was >80%. Passaging was performed by washing in 10 mL phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4 (PBS; Sigma-Aldrich), incubating in 3 or 5 mL Accutase cell detachment solution (eBioscience) at 37°C, adding 7 or 10 mL culture medium and centrifuging (10 minutes at 125g), and pellets were resuspended in 10 mL culture medium. Cells were counted using a CASYton cell counter (OMNI Life Science).
Microscopy
MNs were seeded 80,000–150,000 cells per 13-mm coverslips (VWR) in 24-well plates (Greiner) and matured for 12–14 days, and SCs were seeded at a density of 10.000 cells/well on coverslips in 24-well plates and grown for 2 days at 37°C, 5%, v/v, CO2. Cells were fixed using 4% PFA (Klinipath) for 10 minutes at room temperature (RT) (MNs) or 4°C (SCs) and stored in PBS at 4°C until usage. Before removal from 24-well plate, fixed cells were washed 3 times with 0.5 mL PBS. The remaining incubations were performed by placing coverslips top-down in 100 μL droplets on parafilm and washing by dipping in PBS: 50 mM NH4Cl for 5 minutes at RT to quench autofluorescence, 1× wash, blocking with PBS-2% BSA (Fraction V, Sigma) for 2 hours RT, wash, heat-inactivated MMN patient serum 1:50 in PBS-2% BSA for 1 hour at RT, 1× wash. Then, coverslips were incubated top-up with 15% v/v complement-active human pooled serum (with or without preincubation with complement blocking antibodies) for 30 minutes at RT and washed once in PBS. Subsequently, cells were incubated top-down with antibodies diluted in PBS-2% BSA for 1 hour at RT in the dark and washed with PBS. Finally, cells were washed with PBS and distilled water (Milli-Q). After wicking of excess liquid on a tissue, coverslips were mounted on an object glass in 7 μL ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant with DAPI (Invitrogen) and dried overnight at RT. Cells were analyzed using a Zeiss Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy) with Colibri LEDs with the following settings: ×20 magnification, 25% LED, 400 ms for Alexa Fluor 488 channel, 100 ms for APC channel, and 50 ms for DAPI channel (unless otherwise indicated in the respective experiment). Four pictures were taken per condition throughout the image field. All pictures were exported in single and merged channel to noncompressed TIFF-format using ZEN 2 software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy). Mean Gray Value was calculated of each single channel using ImageJ (Fiji 1.51 g).
Flow Cytometry
For SCs, surface staining for complement receptors and other membrane proteins was measured by fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FACS), which allows higher throughput than microscopy (which was difficult to optimize for MNs). SCs were transferred to V-bottom plates (Greiner) at a density of 50,000 cells/well. Cells were stained with respective antibodies (see Antibodies and Reagents) diluted in FACS buffer (PBS-1% BSA-0.01% sodium azide) for 45 minutes on ice in the dark. Cells were washed once before, between, and after antibody incubations by adding 100 μL FACS buffer and centrifuging for 5 minutes at 125g. Finally, cells were resuspended in 100 μL FACS buffer and analyzed using a FACS Canto II and accompanying FACS DIVA software (BD Biosciences). When applicable, cells were washed in ice cold PBS and in 100 μL Annexin V binding buffer (BD Biosciences) and stained with cell death markers PE Annexin V (BD Biosciences) and 7-AAD (BD Pharmingen) for 15 minutes at RT, before FACS analysis.
To assess complement activation, cells were opsonized with 20 μL final volume of MMN heat-inactivated patient serum (1:20 dilution in veronal buffer (Lonza) supplemented with CaCl2 to a final concentration of 1.25 mM (VB-Ca)) for 1 hour at RT. Next, cells were washed with 100 μL VB-Ca. When applicable, SCs were subjected to PL-C (Invitrogen) treatment (0.5 U/mL, 1 hour 37°C) before opsonization. Next, the supernatant was discarded, and cells were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with 100 μL fresh serum diluted 1:20 in VB-Ca. This serum was preincubated with EDTA, serum components, or respective antibodies for 15 minutes at RT. After incubation, cells were centrifuged and stained for fixed complement factors according to the above-mentioned staining protocol.
Statistics
GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software) was used for all statistical analyses and visualization of the data. Correlation between parameters was evaluated using Spearman rank correlation coefficient analysis. A 2-sided p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Data Availability
Anonymized data and documentation of this study will be shared on reasonable request from any qualified researcher. Standard data sharing agreements apply.
Results
IgM-Anti-GM1 Antibodies in Sera From Patients With MMN Bind to MNs
Twenty MMN patient sera were used for analyses. On incubation with these sera, binding of IgM to iPSC MNs was observed (Figure 1A), although this binding was different among patients (Figure 1A, quantified in Figure 1B). Staining intensities significantly correlated with anti-GM1 ELISA titers (Figure 1C, rs: 0.87, p < 0.0001).
Expression of Complement-Related Membrane Proteins by iPSC MNs
To prevent complement-mediated damage, cells are equipped with membrane-bound complement regulatory proteins (mCRPs) CD46, CD55, and CD59. CD46 functions as cofactor for factor I–mediated cleavage of C3b and C4b, CD55 inhibits C3 activation by accelerating the decay of C3 convertase, and CD59 inhibits MAC formation.13,20 All mCRPs are expressed by MNs (Figure 2A), with the highest expression found for CD59, whereas that of CD55 and CD46 was lower. The receptor for the anaphylatoxin C3a, C3aR, was also expressed by MNs, as well as lower levels of C5aR and C3b/C4b receptor CD35 (CR1). No expression was found for iC3b receptors CD11b (CR3), and CD11c (CR4) (Figure 2, A and B). High mCRP levels and lower expression of C3aR were confirmed via qPCR (eFigure 1, links.lww.com/NXI/A652).
IgM From Patients With MMN Activates Complement on Binding to MNs
Using microscopy, fixed MNs were found to activate complement on sequential incubation with heat-inactivated MMN serum and fresh serum as complement source, as evidenced by binding of C4 and C3 to the cells. Preincubation of the fresh serum with 10 mM EDTA completely abolished activation. Preincubation with the anti-C2 antibody ARGX-117 (480 μg/mL) prevented C3, but not C4, fixation, demonstrating a main role of the classical or lectin pathway in the activation of complement by IgM bound to MNs. An inhibitory anti-C5 mAb (480 μg/mL) had no effect on C4 or C3 fixation (Figure 3A). Opsonization with different MMN patient sera resulted in variable C3 fixation. C3 fixation to MNs correlated significantly with IgM staining of the cells (rs = 0.60, Spearman rank correlation coefficient, p = 0.0055, Figure 3B) and with IgM anti-GM1 antibody titers determined with ELISA (rs = 0.65, p = 0.0019, Figure 3C).
Expression of mCRPs Protects Against IgM Anti–GM1-Induced Complement-Mediated Cell Lysis
High levels of CD59 protect cells against complement-dependent cytotoxicity. For technical reasons, we could not study the effect of CD59 on complement cytotoxicity of MNs. Therefore, we used a GM1/CD59-positive cell line to study the protective effect of CD59 after IgM anti-GM1 initiated complement activation. The Schwann cell line sNF96.2 expresses GM1 and complement regulatory proteins CD59 and CD55. Incubation of sNF96.2 cells with MMN patient serum indeed showed IgM binding to these cells (Figure 4, A and B). Treatment of SCs with phospholipase C reduced expression of GPI-linked CD55 and CD59 but not that of transmembrane CD46 or GM1 (Figure 4A). Using Annexin V/7-AAD staining to assess pore formation in the cell membrane, we confirmed viability of SCs after incubation with IgM anti-GM1 containing MMN patient serum and complement. In contrast, SCs with strongly reduced CD55 and CD59 levels became permeable on opsonization and complement activation as evidenced by an increase in numbers of Annexin V/7-AAD double-positive cells. This cytotoxic effect of complement was dependent on opsonization of the cells with MMN serum and was not observed without opsonization (VB only, Figure 4C). Reduced protection against complement activation was also reflected by increased C3 and MAC deposition onto SCs that survived complement cytotoxicity (Figure 4, D and E). Thus, CD59-expressing cells are protected against complement activation induced by IgM anti-GM1, presumably at the level of MAC formation and insertion in the cell membrane.
ARGX-117 Inhibits IgM-Mediated Classical Pathway Complement Activation on MNs
ARGX-117 is a novel inhibitory mAb against C2 that blocks the classical and lectin pathway upstream of C3 convertase formation. To estimate the C2 dependency of complement activation by MNs sensitized with serum from patients with MMN, C3 fixation was investigated using C2-depleted serum supplemented with various amounts of C2, as complement source. C3 fixation on MNs was abrogated when C2-depleted serum was used (Figure 5,A and B). Reconstitution of depleted serum with C2 up to physiologic levels (30 μg/mL) dose dependently restored C3 fixation (Figure 5, A and B). Next, complement-active sera were incubated with ARGX-117 (200, 50, 12, 3 μg/mL) before incubation with sensitized MNs (Figure 5, C and D). ARGX-117 strongly inhibited C3 fixation on MNs by >90% at approximately equimolar concentrations (50 μg/mL) to C2.
Discussion
In this study, we investigated complement activation by anti-GM1 IgM antibodies from MMN patient sera in a disease model for MMN and characterized expression of complement receptors and membrane-bound complement regulators on iPSC-derived MNs. We found that IgM anti-GM1 binding to MNs triggers complement activation, which is dependent on C2, and does not induce lysis because of CD59 expression. This activation is effectively inhibited by a novel antibody targeting C2, ARGX-117. Thus, C2 represents a promising new target for the treatment of MMN.
The disease model used in this study lacks the interplay between SCs and MNs and does not account for myelination or the formation of the nodes of Ranvier, which are implicated in the pathogenesis of MMN.1,2,5 Despite these limitations, we believe that the in vitro model in its current form is suitable for studying some mechanistic aspects of the potential pathologic effects of IgM anti-GM1 antibodies and evaluate novel treatment strategies,8 especially because suitable animal models for MMN are lacking.
The binding of IgM to iPSC-derived MNs in this disease model correlated with IgM anti-GM1 antibody titers determined with ELISA,3 implying that most IgM bound to iPSC-derived MNs is directed against GM1. Importantly, both IgM anti-GM1 antibody titers and IgM binding to MNs significantly correlated with complement activation, as reflected by C3 fixation. This confirms earlier results with ELISAs that IgM anti-GM1 antibody titers correlate with complement fixation7 and our previous report that IgM anti-GM1 also activates complement in an iPSC-model for MMN.8 Because anti-GM1 antibodies in MMN are almost exclusively of the IgM isotype,21 the main effector system recruited by these autoantibodies is complement activation, in particular via the classical pathway, although some human IgM also can activate the lectin pathway of complement.22
iPSC-derived MNs express the mCRPs CD46 and CD55 and in particular CD59. These expression patterns not only are consistent with postmortem and biopsy studies of the sciatic nerve and of primary cells cultured from sural nerves23-25 but also predict protection against the cytotoxic effects of MAC. For technical reasons, such protective effect could not be demonstrated with iPSC-derived MNs, but was demonstrated for SCs that also express GM1 and mCRPs. Removal of CD55 and CD59 made these cells highly sensitive to lysis by anti-GM1 induced complement activation (Figure 4).
Because iPSC-derived MNs express the anaphylatoxin receptors C3aR and C5aR, fluid-phase complement activation products, such as C3a or C5a, may play a dominant role in the pathophysiology of MMN.26 Overall, the data on expression of mCRPs and CRs suggest that MNs and SCs possess sophisticated complement sensing and modulating capacities,27,28 the biological relevance of which needs to be further elucidated.
IV immunoglobulins are the only approved treatment for MMN.9,10 IVIg may contain IgG antineuronal antibodies, and it has been proposed that these could elevate titers of presumed pathogenic antibodies.29 The samples used in the present study were previously screened using a GM1 ELISA. IgG anti-GM1 was only detected in 1 of 110 patients with MMN, and this patient was not included in this study.30 The strong correlation between IgM anti-GM1 titers in the ELISA, IgM binding, and subsequent C3 fixation to MNs suggested that IgM anti-GM1 antibodies are the major driver of complement activation in the MMN disease model. Because IVIg contains only trace amounts of IgM,31 it is not a likely source of pathogenic IgM anti-GM1 antibodies.
Among the proposed immune modulatory effects of IVIg is inhibition of complement activation at multiple levels, including deposition of C3 on activators.32-34 Indeed, IVIg infusion reduces classical complement activity in patients with MMN, whereas titers and complement-activating capacity of IgM anti-GM1 remained unchanged.15 To avoid a potential interference of IVIg in the assays described here, we used heat-inactivated MMN serum to opsonize the cells, subsequently washed these to remove patient serum including IVIg when present, and then added fresh normal human serum as complement source. Therefore, IVIg treatment of the patients with MMN has not influenced the results of our study.
The results of our study may explain the negative outcome of an open-label trial using eculizumab, an anti-C5 mAb, in addition to IVIg maintenance therapy.35 Considering their high CD59 expression, iPSC-derived MNs seem to have a high innate ability to inhibit the terminal part of the complement cascade. Targeting C5 to preserve the function of MNs on complement activation by anti-GM1 IgM antibodies may therefore have limited effect. Moreover, C5 is downstream of C3, whereas the presence of C3aR on MNs suggests that complement activation upstream of C5 may have functional consequences for MNs. Therefore, targeting C2, which is at the junction of the classical and lectin pathway, seems an interesting approach in MMN, the more because IgM can activate both pathways. Moreover, the clinical phenotype of a C2 deficiency is less severe than that of C3 or C4 deficiency.36,37 ARGX-117, a novel potent antibody targeting C216, indeed abrogates C3 fixation induced by IgM anti-GM1 on MNs in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 5).
In conclusion, we have characterized complement activation by GM1 autoantibodies derived from patients with MMN, using iPSC-derived MNs as an ex vivo disease model for MMN. Patient-derived IgM antibodies bind to iPSC MNs and activate complement. These results emphasize the role of IgM anti-GM1 and complement in MMN pathogenesis. Moreover, complement activation by IgM anti-GM1 on MNs can be effectively inhibited by targeting C2 using ARGX-117. Considering that IVIg treatment, though effective in MMN, can often not prevent a progressive disease course, we propose based on the data described here, to evaluate ARGX-117 as a treatment of MMN.
Glossary
- DAPI
4'6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
- EDTA
ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid
- FACS
fluorescent-activated cell sorting
- IgM
immunoglobulin M
- iPSC
induced pluripotent stem cell
- IVIg
IV immunoglobulin
- MAC
membrane attack complex
- MMN
multifocal motor neuropathy
- MN
motor neuron
- RT
room temperature
- SC
Schwann cell
Appendix. Authors
Contributor Information
Kevin Budding, Email: k.budding@umcutrecht.nl.
Lill Eva Johansen, Email: l.e.johansen@vu.nl.
Inge Van de Walle, Email: ivandewalle@argenx.com.
Kim Dijkxhoorn, Email: k.dijkxhoorn@umcutrecht.nl.
Elisabeth de Zeeuw, Email: e.dezeeuw@umcutrecht.nl.
Lauri M. Bloemenkamp, Email: l.m.bloemenkamp-2@umcutrecht.nl.
Jeroen W. Bos, Email: j.w.bos-6@umcutrecht.nl.
Marc D. Jansen, Email: m.d.jansen-6@umcutrecht.nl.
Chantall A.D. Curial, Email: cc27862002@yahoo.com.
Karen Silence, Email: ksilence@argenx.com.
Hans de Haard, Email: hdehaard@argenx.com.
Christophe Blanchetot, Email: cblanchetot@argenx.com.
Liesbeth Van de Ven, Email: liezievdv@gmail.com.
Jeanette H.W. Leusen, Email: jleusen@umcutrecht.nl.
R. Jeroen Pasterkamp, Email: r.j.pasterkamp@umcutrecht.nl.
Leonard H. van den Berg, Email: l.h.vandenberg@umcutrecht.nl.
C. Erik Hack, Email: c.erikhack@gmail.com.
Peter Boross, Email: peterboross@gmail.com.
Study Funding
No targeted funding reported.
Disclosure
I. van de walle, H. de Haard, C. Blanchetot, and L. van de Ven: employees and equity ownership in argenx BVBA. C. Erik Hack: employee of Prothix BV and providing consultancy services for argenx BVBA. P. Boross: employee of Prothix BV. K. Silence: providing consultancy services for argenx BVBA. W. Ludo van der Pol serves on the scientific advisory board for SAB SMA Europe; provides ad hoc consultancy for argenx, Biogen, and AveXis; and receives research support from the Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds, Vriendenloterij and Stichting Spieren voor Spieren. L. H. van den Berg serves on scientific advisory boards for Orion, Biogen, and Cytokinetics; received an educational grant from Takeda; serves on the editorial boards of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration and the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry; and receives research support from the Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds, Netherlands ALS Foundation, and the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (Vici Scheme, JPND [SOPHIA, STRENGTH, ALSCare]). Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.
References
- 1.Beadon K, Guimarães-Costa R, Léger JM. Multifocal motor neuropathy. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018;31(5):559-564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nobile-Orazio E. Multifocal motor neuropathy. J Neuroimmunol. 2001;115(1-2):4-18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cats EA, van der Pol WL, Piepers S, et al. Correlates of outcome and response to IVIg in 88 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy. Neurology. 2010;75(9):818-825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Morikawa M, Kuwahara M, Ueno R, Samukawa M, Hamada Y, Kusunoki S. Serological study using glycoarray for detecting antibodies to glycolipids and glycolipid complexes in immune-mediated neuropathies. J Neuroimmunol. 2016;301:35-40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Martinez-Thompson JM, Snyder MR, Ettore M, et al. . Composite ganglioside autoantibodies and immune treatment response in MMN and MADSAM. Muscle Nerve. 2018;57(6):1000-1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yeh WZ, Dyck PJ, van den Berg LH, Kiernan MC, Taylor BV, Taylor BV. Multifocal motor neuropathy: controversies and priorities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91(2):140-148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Vlam L, Cats EA, Harschnitz O, et al. Complement activity is associated with disease severity in multifocal motor neuropathy. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2015;2(4):e119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Harschnitz O, van den Berg LH, Johansen LE, et al. Autoantibody pathogenicity in a multifocal motor neuropathy induced pluripotent stem cell-derived model. Ann Neurol. 2016;80(1):71-88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.van der Pol WL, Cats EA, van den Berg LH. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in multifocal motor neuropathy. J Clin Immunol. 2010;30(suppl 1):S79-S83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Al-Zuhairy A, Jakobsen J, Andersen H, Sindrup SH, Markvardsen LK. Randomized trial of facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin in multifocal motor neuropathy. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26(10):1289-e82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Herraets I, van Rosmalen M, Bos J, et al. Clinical outcomes in multifocal motor neuropathy: a combined cross-sectional and follow-up study. Neurology. 2020;95(14):e1979-e1987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lucisano Valim YM, Lachmann PJ. The effect of antibody isotype and antigenic epitope density on the complement-fixing activity of immune complexes: a systematic study using chimaeric anti-NIP antibodies with human fc regions. Clin Exp Immunol. 1991;84(1):1-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dalakas MC, Alexopoulos H, Spaeth PJ. Complement in neurological disorders and emerging complement-targeted therapeutics. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(11):601-617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Van den Berg-Vos RM, Franssen H, Wokke JH, Van Es HW, Van den Berg LH. Multifocal motor neuropathy: diagnostic criteria that predict the response to immunoglobulin treatment. Ann Neurol. 2000;48(6):919-926. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Piepers S, Jansen MD, Cats EA, van Sorge NM, van den Berg LH, van der Pol WL. IVIg inhibits classical pathway activity and anti-GM1 IgM-mediated complement deposition in MMN. J Neuroimmunol. 2010;229(1-2):256-262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Van de Walle I, Silence K, Budding K, et al. . ARGX-117, a therapeutic complement inhibiting antibody targeting C2. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147(4):1420-1429.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ormel PR, Vieira de Sá R, van Bodegraven EJ, et al. Microglia innately develop within cerebral organoids. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dimos JT, Rodolfa KT, Niakan KK, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells generated from patients with ALS can be differentiated into motor neurons. Science. 2008;321(5893):1218-1221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Amoroso MW, Croft GF, Williams DJ, et al. Accelerated high-yield generation of limb-innervating motor neurons from human stem cells. J Neurosci. 2013;33(2):574-586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim DD, Song WC. Membrane complement regulatory proteins. Clin Immunol. 2006;118(2-3):127-136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cats EA, van der Pol WL, Tio-Gillen AP, Diekstra FP, van den Berg LH, Jacobs BC. Clonality of anti-GM1 IgM antibodies in multifocal motor neuropathy and the Guillain-Barré syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86(5):502-504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.McMullen ME, Hart ML, Walsh MC, Buras J, Takahashi K, Stahl GL. Mannose-binding lectin binds IgM to activate the lectin complement pathway in vitro and in vivo. Immunobiology. 2006;211(10):759-766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vedeler C, Ulvestad E, Bjørge L, et al. The expression of CD59 in normal human nervous tissue. Immunology. 1994;82(4):542-547. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.de Jonge RR, Vreijling JP, Meintjes A, et al. Transcriptional profile of the human peripheral nervous system by serial analysis of gene expression. Genomics. 2003;82(2):97-108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Koski CL, Estep AE, Sawant-Mane S, Shin ML, Highbarger L, Hansch GM. Complement regulatory molecules on human myelin and glial cells: differential expression affects the deposition of activated complement proteins. J Neurochem. 1996;66(1):303-312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.van Beek J, van Meurs M, 't Hart BA, et al. . Decay-accelerating factor (CD55) is expressed by neurons in response to chronic but not acute autoimmune central nervous system inflammation associated with complement activation. J Immunol. 2005;174(4):2353-2365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nataf S, Stahel PF, Davoust N, Barnum SR. Complement anaphylatoxin receptors on neurons: new tricks for old receptors? Trends Neurosci. 1999;22(9):397-402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Davoust N, Jones J, Stahel PF, Ames RS, Barnum SR. Receptor for the C3a anaphylatoxin is expressed by neurons and glial cells. Glia. 1999;26(3):201-211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dimitriadou MM, Alexopoulos H, Akrivou S, Gola E, Dalakas MC. Anti-neuronal antibodies within the IVIg preparations: importance in clinical practice. Neurotherapeutics. 2020;17(1):235-242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cats EA, Jacobs BC, Yuki N, et al. Multifocal motor neuropathy: association of anti-GM1 IgM antibodies with clinical features. Neurology. 2010;75(22):1961-1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Laursen IA, Blou L, Sullivan JS, Bang P, Balstrup F, Houen G. Development, manufacturing and characterization of a highly purified, liquid immunoglobulin G preparation from human plasma. Transfus Med Hemother. 2014;41(3):205-212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Arumugam TV, Tang SC, Lathia JD, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) protects the brain against experimental stroke by preventing complement-mediated neuronal cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(35):14104-14109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Basta M, Van Goor F, Luccioli S, et al. F(ab)'2-mediated neutralization of C3a and C5a anaphylatoxins: a novel effector function of immunoglobulins. Nat Med. 2003;9(4):431-438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Basta M, Dalakas MC. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin exerts its beneficial effect in patients with dermatomyositis by blocking endomysial deposition of activated complement fragments. J Clin Invest. 1994;94(5):1729-1735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fitzpatrick AM, Mann CA, Barry S, Brennan K, Overell JR, Willison HJ. An open label clinical trial of complement inhibition in multifocal motor neuropathy. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2011;16(2):84-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tedesco F. Inherited complement deficiencies and bacterial infections. Vaccine. 2008;26(suppl 8):I3-I8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Macedo AC, Isaac L. Systemic lupus erythematosus and deficiencies of early components of the complement classical pathway. Front Immunol. 2016;7:55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Anonymized data and documentation of this study will be shared on reasonable request from any qualified researcher. Standard data sharing agreements apply.