Table 2.
References | Types of Biomaterial | Composition | Study Design | Result | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zhao et al., 2021 [70] | Hydrogel | 3-acrylamido phenylboronic acid (APBA), acrylamide |
|
ROS assay: Intracellular ROS reduction Wound: (Day 18) 2.0% wound closure, thicker tissue granulation |
Able to induce intracellular ROS. In vivo: Promote tissue granulation, neovascularisation, angiogenesis, and high collagen deposition |
Sun et al., 2020 [53] | Nanoparticles | Ascorbic acid, gelatine, chitosan |
|
Wound: (Day 10) Epithelium completely healed in treatment group (visible neovascular vessels, hair follicles, and skin attachments) Healing rate: Significantly higher than other groups (p > 0.001). |
In vivo: Accelerate collagen accumulation, enhance angiogenesis, and suppress inflammatory cells infiltration |
S. Lee et al., 2020 [51] | Coated film | Polycaprolactone (PCL) |
|
Apoptotic gene: ↓BAX Anti-apoptotic genes: ↑BCL2, ↑BCL2-L1 Anti-oxidative catalase: ↑FOXO3, ↑GPX-1 |
Effectively protect against ROS-induced oxidative damage |
Kar et al., 2019 [52] | Hydrogel-based wound patches | Guar gum (GG), sodium alginate (SA), silver nanoparticles (AgNP) |
|
Wound: (Day 9) ~30% remaining to heal (p < 0.0001) compared to control 75% | In vivo: Accelerate collagen deposition, wound healing, angiogenesis, neovascularisation, modulate growth factors, and inflammatory cytokines |
Pires et al., 2019 [54] | Nanofiber membrane | Polycaprolactone (PCL), gelatine |
|
H2O2 exposure: Membranes drops to ~20% compared to control ~45% UV exposure: Cell survival percentage > 76.9% (treatment); 52.9% (control) |
Stagnant oxidative-stress cell damage |
Liu et al., 2017 [58] | Hydrogel | Hyaluronic acid (HA) |
|
Inhibit macrophages-mediated ROS | ROS levels significantly reduced compared to unstimulated macrophages |
Chu et al., 2017 [56] | Membrane | Collagen |
|
0.064% collagen-EGCG shows highest cell proliferation | Downregulating MAPK signalling pathway, induce ROS |