Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 12.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2021 Apr 21;593(7860):607–611. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03478-3

Extended Data Table 1 |.

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement, and validation statistics

WT pore WT prepore L192E pore (EMDB-21160) (PDB 6VFE) L192E prepore (EMDB-21161)
Data collection and processing
Magnification 81,000 81,000 105,000 105,000
Voltage (kV) 300 300 300 300
Electron exposure (e–/Å2) 48.58 48.58 63.25 63.25
Defocus range (μm) −1.0 to −2.5 −1.0 to −2.5 −0.8 to −2.5 −0.8 to −2.5
Pixel size (Å) 0.53 0.53 0.85 0.85
Symmetry imposed C33 C34 C33 C33
Initial particle images (no.) 60,082 94,352 41,413 21,200
Final particle images (no.) 60,082 94,352 2,734 11,640
Map resolution (Å) 5.8 7.3 3.9 6.9
 FSC threshold 0.143 0.143 0.143 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) 60.0–5.8 60.0–7.3 60.0–3.9 60.0–6.9
Refinement
Initial model used (PDB code) 6N90 6N90
Model resolution (Å) 3.7/4.2 7.3/10.6
 FSC threshold 0.143/0.5 0.143/0.5
Model resolution range (Å) 59.0–3.4 45.9–3.4
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) −168.81 −652.00
Model composition
 Non-hydrogen atoms 62,238 46,299
 Protein residues 7,953 5,742
 Ligands 0 0
B factors (Å2)
 Protein 73.57 215.68
 Ligand N/A N/A
R.m.s. deviations
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.007 0.005
 Bond angles (°) 0.943 1.153
Validation
 MolProbity score 2.81 3.00
 Clashscore 6.96 26.07
 Poor rotamers (%) 6.76 4.32
Ramachandran plot
 Favored (%) 89.82 87.35
 Allowed (%) 10.18 12.65
 Disallowed (%) 0.00 0.00