Abstract
Measles virus is directly responsible for more than 100,000 deaths yearly. Epidemiological studies have associated measles with increased morbidity and mortality for years after infection, but the reasons why are poorly understood. Measles virus infects immune cells, causing acute immune suppression. To identify and quantify long-term effects of measles on the immune system, we used VirScan, an assay that tracks antibodies to thousands of pathogen epitopes in blood. We studied 77 unvaccinated children before and 2 months after natural measles virus infection. Measles caused elimination of 11 to 73% of the antibody repertoire across individuals. Recovery of antibodies was detected after natural reexposure to pathogens. Notably, these immune system effects were not observed in infants vaccinated against MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella), but were confirmed in measles-infected macaques. The reduction in humoral immune memory after measles infection generates potential vulnerability to future infections, underscoring the need for widespread vaccination.
In the time before vaccination, nearly every child experienced measles, which resulted in millions of deaths. Global measles vaccination efforts have led to logarithmic reductions in the incidence of measles virus (MV) infections and measles-related mortality. However, measles remains endemic in much of the world, affecting >7 million people annually and causing >100,000 deaths (1–3). After decades of decline, the number of worldwide cases of measles has increased by nearly 300% since 2018 as a result of reduced vaccination (2). This increase is likely to be accompanied by substantial mortality risks (3). The resurgence of measles underscores the importance of understanding the full consequences of MV infection and accurately estimating the value of measles vaccination (4).
Immunosuppression was first documented when children with measles showed negative cutaneous tuberculin reactions after previously testing positive (5). Subsequent studies have shown decreased interferon signaling, skewed cytokine responses, lymphopenia, and suppression of lymphocyte proliferation shortly after infection (6). The MV receptor CD150/SLAMF1 (signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family member 1) is highly expressed on memory T, B, and plasma cells, resulting in their infection and depletion without an effect on total immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels (7–12). Recovery of the functional immune response, including resolution of lymphopenia, occurs 2 to 4 weeks after viral clearance (6, 10, 13, 14). However, MV replication in immune cells has been hypothesized to impair immune memory, potentially causing “immunological amnesia” (10, 15, 16).
Most bona fide immune memory cells reside in the lymphoid tissues and bone marrow (17–20). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells are often used for evaluating immunological memory repertoires. However, these cells are in relative flux owing to recent infections, which limits their utility for measuring long-term immune memory. Antibodies are thought to better represent long-lived humoral memory (18, 20). Most antibodies in the peripheral blood are produced by bone marrow long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs) and are impervious to disruptions in peripheral memory cells (17–22). Changes in pathogen-specific antibodies measured in the peripheral blood reflect changes in the long-lived permanent memory repertoire.
Epidemiological evidence has associated MV infections with increases in morbidity and mortality for as long as 5 years (15, 23) and suggests that in the pre-vaccine era, MV may have been associated with up to 50% of all childhood deaths from infectious diseases, mostly from non-MV infections (15). This phenomenon might be explained by immune amnesia. However, to date, no study has successfully resolved whether measles-induced immune amnesia—a reduction in the diversity of the immune memory repertoire after measles infections—indeed exists. To address this issue, we have studied paired blood samples collected before and after MV infection using a seroprofiling tool that allows the detection of thousands of pathogen-specific antibodies.
Measuring the consequences of measles on immune memory
During a recent measles outbreak in the Netherlands, families in communities with low vaccination rates consented to provide blood samples. Plasma was collected before and after laboratory-confirmed MV infection from 77 unimmunized children with a mean age of 9 (SD ± 2) years, plus five unimmunized children who remained uninfected during the study (24). Of the 77 children, 34 were reported to have mild measles and 43 to have severe measles [detailed in (24)]. The mean time between sample collections was 10 weeks, and mean time of collection after MV infection was 7 weeks (table S1).
To measure the diversity and magnitude of the epitope-specific antibody repertoires in these children and controls, we used VirScan (25), a phage-display immunoprecipitation and sequencing (PhIP-Seq) technology (26) developed for virome-wide detection of antibodies against viral epitopes. VirScan primarily detects antibodies to short contiguous epitopes as opposed to conformational epitopes. The cells producing antibodies to all epitopes are phenotypically similar, aside from their antibody product. Thus, changes in the antibody repertoire detected by VirScan represent changes across the spectrum of antibodies, and these include neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies. For this study, we generated an expanded VirScan library that encodes the full proteomes of most known human pathogenic viruses (~400 species and strains) plus many bacterial proteins. For each sample, we obtained a comprehensive measure of the individual’s antipathogen antibody repertoire diversity (i.e., the total epitope hits across all pathogen peptides). We also derived an antibody epitope binding signal (EBS), which is a relative measure of antibody titer for each epitope.
We used VirScan to profile the immune memory antibody repertoires before (time 1) and after (time 2) MV infection. Paired samples were also obtained from four control cohorts (n = 119 paired specimens; table S1). These samples were derived from: (i) approximately age-matched controls sampled at similar intervals (~3 months) as the measles cohorts (control A; n = 28 paired specimens); (ii) age-matched controls with samples collected ~1 year apart (control B; n = 31); (iii) adult controls with collection intervals similar to the measles-infected individuals (control C; n = 22); (iv) young children before and after their first measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination (MMR vaccinated; n = 33); and (v) unvaccinated children from the same community as the MV cases but who remained seronegative for MV (MV negative; n = 5). Control cohorts A, B, and C were individuals with no known exposure to MV.
Measles modulates the diversity of the antibody repertoire and causes loss of preexisting antibodies
We assessed changes in antibody repertoire diversity (measured as the total number of unique pathogen epitopes recognized, or epitope hits) before and after measles relative to those observed in controls, standardizing the total number of epitope hits per individual by cohort for comparison (Fig. 1A). We detected substantial reductions in the number of pathogen epitopes recognized after measles but limited changes in the absence of measles. MV infections were associated with a mean reduction of ~20% in the overall diversity or size of the antibody repertoire measured by VirScan (Fig. 1B), and this was consistent across individual pathogens (Fig. 1, D and E, and fig. S1). However, effect sizes varied. Notably, 12 of the 77 children (16%) lost >40% of their overall antibody repertoire diversity. We detected increases in MV-specific epitopes in children after measles infection or MMR vaccination (Fig. 1C). No changes in the total IgG, IgA, or IgM levels were detected, as determined by quantitative ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) (fig. S2). These results suggest that, rather than a simple loss of total IgG, there is a restructuring of the antibody repertoire after measles.
To measure the full effect of measles on the pre-measles repertoire and to circumvent interference from new exposures during follow-up, we next restricted analysis to epitopes detected at the first time point and quantified retention or loss of epitope recognition. After severe or mild measles, children lost a median of 40% (range: 11 to 62%) or 33% (range: 12 to 73%), respectively, of their total preexisting pathogen-specific antibody repertoires (Fig. 2A and fig. S3). In contrast, controls retained ~90% of their repertoires over similar or longer durations.
Controlling for interval duration in a binomial random effects model (see materials and methods), we estimated the per-pathogen probability of antibody retention for each child (Fig. 2, B and C). Loss of antibodies after MV infection varied widely for specific pathogens and between children. A small fraction of MV-infected individuals retained antibodies similar to the bottom quartile of the controls. However, the most-affected 20% of children lost >50% of the pathogen-specific antibodies for most pathogens. In some of these children, up to 70% loss was detected for specific pathogens.
Antibody repertoire retention (~90%) was similar in control cohorts A and B despite the longer sampling interval in B compared with A (1 year versus 3 months). The retained antibody repertoire could represent a core stable LLPC repertoire (~90%), and the 10% that was lost could represent a transient repertoire derived from IgG-secreting B cells and plasmablasts. This result is consistent with previous studies that showed no effect of immunosuppressive therapy, such as B cell–depleting anti-CD19 or anti-CD20 treatment, on retention of the majority of the antibody repertoire (17, 19, 21, 22). Therefore, measles is associated with greater loss of antibody-mediated epitope recognition than can be explained by ablation of B cells, suggesting a direct effect on the LLPC compartment.
Measles decreases the strength of epitope recognition
Simply counting epitope numbers recognized before and after measles underestimates immune memory impairment because epitope recognition can be detected even when a large fraction of cellular clones producing the relevant antibody are eliminated. To quantify the relative abundance of particular antibodies, we generated an EBS metric, which is a z-score that measures the relative enrichment of an epitope in a VirScan immunoprecipitation (see materials and methods). Thus, EBS represents a VirScan analog of relative antibody titers and can be measured over time to detect changes in epitope recognition. Significant increases in EBS for a given epitope usually indicate a new exposure during the follow-up interval. In controls, significant reductions are normally detected when a recent exposure has occurred before the first time point, resulting in a peak around time 1 followed by an expected rapid decay of the antibody signal that is detected at time 2.
To evaluate changes in EBS for each pathogen species in each child, EBS signals were clustered by pathogen species and child (EBSPC) and a paired t test (paired per epitope) was used to test for significant differences at time 2 versus time 1. False discovery rate (fdr)–adjusted P values, sample size, and effect size (calculated as the fold change of the geometric mean at time 2 versus time 1) are shown for each EBSPC cluster (Fig. 3A and fig. S4).
Significant changes in EBSPC were detected in children in each cohort. Among controls, these changes were distributed equally, below and above a fold change of 1, indicating recent pathogen exposures before time 1 or during the follow-up interval, respectively. Unlike the controls, after measles, the significant changes in pathogen-specific EBSPC were both more frequent and nearly uniformly negative with median fold changes (0.58 and 0.62), indicating ~40% reductions in EBSs (Fig. 3A). The effect was stronger after severe versus mild MV infections (P < 0.001). We confirmed these results by comparing the fold changes in EBSPC to quantitative ELISA assays for adenovirus, enterovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in a selection of children who had decreased or increased EBS, and found good correlation (correlation coefficient r = 0.73; P < 0.001) (fig. S5, A and B).
To further clarify cohort-level changes, we combined the epitopes from all individuals and evaluated changes on a per-pathogen-species basis across each cohort (fig. S6). Among MV-infected individuals, the median fold change in EBS measured across all species was a strongly negative effect (median fold change: 0.69 or −31%; P < 0.0001). In contrast, among controls, the antibody EBS was significantly changed only for relatively few pathogen species, and these were roughly balanced between positive and negative effects.
Measles disrupts recognition of pathogen epitopes across the cohort
At the cellular level, MV would not be expected to preferentially infect particular antibody-secreting cells on the basis of their pathogen targets or the type of antibodies produced (i.e., neutralizing or not). We therefore tested for cohort-wide differences in EBSs on a perepitope basis. Across approximately 1100 epitopes each from the control A and B cohorts, none significantly changed (Fig. 3, B and C, and fig. S7), indicating that antibody epitope recognition across a group of individuals is remarkably stable, even when changes are detected at the pathogen species level, as in fig. S6. In contrast, EBS was substantially reduced in 12% of the 855 epitopes evaluated after mild MV infections and in 39% of the 1079 epitopes evaluated after severe MV infections (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 3, B and C). Only one epitope in mild measles and three in severe measles showed a significant increase, <0.2% overall.
VirScan detects neutralizing antibodies when those antibodies target short contiguous epitopes encoded in the phage display. A well-characterized neutralizing short contiguous epitope is the 24-amino-acid target of the anti-RSV monoclonal antibody therapies palivizumab and motavizumab. Among 22 MV-infected children with antibodies against this neutralizing epitope and without evidence of new RSV exposure, we detected a fold change in EBS of 0.59 (SD ± 0.18; P < 0.001) (fig. S8), in line with the observations above and indicating that the effects of MV are the same for the neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibody repertoires.
The MMR vaccine does not impair the immune repertoire
A marked increase in the overall antibody repertoire diversity was noted in MMR-vaccinated controls (Fig. 1), indicating that a similar loss of antibodies does not appear to accompany receipt of MMR vaccines compared with MV infections. However, in infants and young children, such as the MMR-vaccinated cohort in this study, the antibody repertoire continues to add antibody diversity over time (fig. S9). This is particularly true during the second year of life, following depletion of maternal antibodies, when measles vaccines are first given. These overall increases in antibody diversity over time could be obscuring potential minor impairments from measles vaccine, especially given the relatively long sampling interval for the vaccinated controls. To determine whether viral responses before or after MMR vaccination might be impaired, we analyzed EBS for antibodies detected surrounding MMR vaccine. We found no overall change in EBS after MMR vaccination (fig. S10), which is consistent with observations that the MV vaccine strains are not associated with widespread infection of CD150+ lymphocytes (27, 28). Thus, this higher-resolution analysis failed to detect immune impairment at the epitope level. Combined with increased epitope diversity after MMR vaccination (Fig. 1A), this analysis supports decades of observations that MMR vaccines do not increase susceptibility to subsequent infections (29, 30). Nevertheless, because of the naturally rapidly increasing antibody diversity in this young cohort at the time of MMR receipt, we cannot definitively rule out the potential for minor reductions of antibody-producing cells with measles vaccination.
Reconstruction of the antibody repertoire with high-transmission pathogens is spatially clustered
Although antibody diversity and abundance were negatively affected for almost all pathogens, a subset of children had increased EBS and/or epitope hits for particular pathogens after measles (Figs. 1, D and E, and 3A; and figs. S4, S8, and S11), suggestive of potential restoration of immune memory after the initial immune depletion.
Across all of the pathogen-child combinations with significantly increased EBS after measles, 80% were attributable to only six pathogens: adenovirus C, influenza A virus, respiratory syncytial virus, human herpesvirus 4 (Epstein-Barr virus; HHV-4), Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus. In these children, the probability of retaining preexisting antibodies for these pathogens was relatively high (fig. S12).
If reconstruction of the antibody repertoire requires new exposures, children experiencing repertoire reconstruction for transmissible pathogens should cluster spatially. Using postal codes and household identifiers, we observed clustering of pathogen-specific repertoire reconstruction at both the postal code or school level and the household level (Fig. 4). Among 19 children with increased adenovirus C antibody EBS, eight (42%) came from a single postal code (number 7) that included only 12 (16%) of the 77 measles cases (Fig. 4A). Thus, children in this postal code had significantly increased odds [odds ratio (OR) 9.4; Fisher’s exact test, P < 0.001] of recovering their adenovirus C repertoire versus other postal codes, suggesting recovery is associated with pathogen transmission. Moreover, six of these children (75%) shared a household with another child with increased adenovirus C EBS. We found similar clustering effects for other respiratory pathogens: influenza A virus [of eight children with increased influenza A EBS, five (63%) were from a single postal code representing only 26% of the measles cases (OR 5.8; P < 0.05) and two were from the same household; Fig. 4B]; RSV [of nine with increased EBS, five (56%) were from the same postal code (OR 4.5; P < 0.05) and four of them (44%) shared a house; Fig. 4C]; rhinovirus [of 12 with increased EBS, eight (67%) shared a household with at least one other child with increased rhinovirus EBS]; and S. pneumoniae [of 13, seven (54%) came from a single postal code (OR 4.5; P < 0.05) and two shared a household]. Combined, these indicate local pathogen transmission and suggest that reconstruction of the antibody repertoire occurs on a per-pathogen basis and is associated with new exposures.
In contrast to the highly transmissible respiratory pathogens above, where mean EBS was increased after measles infection, we found that for chronic viruses [i.e., HHV-4 and human herpesvirus 5 (cytomegalovirus; HHV-5)], there was no evidence of spatial clustering. Further, only 6 out of 12 individuals (50%) with increased HHV-4 antibody EBS also developed antibodies against new HHV-4 epitopes. HHV-5 behaved similarly, with only 33% of individuals with increased HHV-5 antibody EBS also developing new antibodies to previously untargeted HHV-5 epitopes. The lack of development of antibodies targeting new epitopes, despite increases in EBS of existing antibodies for these two pathogens, is different from what we observed for the more-transmissible viruses noted above, in which 90% of pathogen-specific increases in EBS at time 2 were associated with development of new antibodies against previously unrecognized pathogen-specific epitopes. An increase in EBS without addition of new epitope recognition points toward reinfection with or reactivation of the same virus.
Two additional notable pathogens for which positive changes in EBS were often detected after measles were the bacteria S. pneumoniae and S. aureus. Acute viral respiratory infections, including measles, increase susceptibility to respiratory bacterial infections (6, 31–33). After measles, new acquisitions of bacteria or increased replication of already colonizing bacteria could elicit antibody responses and reinstate antibody diversity and protection against these pathogens. In line with this, we observed net increases in antibody diversity, including development of antibodies against new epitopes, and increases in EBS for S. aureus [the only pathogen for which a net positive change in antibody diversity or EBS was detected after measles; 45 of 77 children (58%) had increased EBS] (Fig. 1 and fig. S11). Increases were also observed for S. pneumoniae, although the overall cohort-level effect remained negative.
Reconstruction of the antibody repertoire through reexposure after measles carries risks
Despite the potential benefits of reinstating the antibody repertoire, exposure to pathogens after measles—especially when in the presence of diminished preexisting immune memory—can carry risks. Ten of 43 children (23%) with severe measles were diagnosed with acute otitis media (AOM; most commonly pneumococcal), which was associated with a threefold increase in odds of carrying greater pneumococcal antibody diversity after measles compared with children without an AOM diagnosis. In addition, two children with mild measles and AOM and one with a diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia had increased pneumococcal antibody diversity at follow-up. Combined, these effects suggest that the antibody repertoire begins rebuilding soon after measles, through pathogen exposures, and that pathogen exposure after measles, while serving to reinstate immune memory, may pose excess risk.
Experimental MV infection confirms a decrease in previously acquired immune memory
To confirm the findings above using a controlled experimental setting with longer follow-up, we used VirScan to profile the antibody repertoire in plasma collected before and 5 months after experimental MV infection of four rhesus macaques (34). The overall diversity of the antibody repertoire was decreased an average of 26% (range: 21 to 35%), and reductions were distributed across pathogens (Fig. 5A). Notable exceptions were observed for simian foamy virus and Epstein-Barr virus, both of which can reactivate during immune dysregulation and thus may be early contributors to repertoire reconstruction. As expected, we detected increases in recognition of MV epitopes (Fig. 5B). Out of 21 MV epitopes recognized after measles, only one (phosphoprotein/V protein 29) was recognized before infection and was reduced by 40%. This likely represented a cross-reactive epitope that was diminished along with the rest of the repertoire.
Each monkey lost, on average, 40 to 60% of its preexisting antibody repertoire (Fig. 5C), and this loss persisted for at least 5 months after MV infection. In each monkey, the fractions lost were distributed across the pathogens, which is expected for a virus that indiscriminately infects antibody-secreting cells.
Cumulative evidence supports the establishment of an immune amnesia state after measles
Using VirScan, we quantified the effects of measles on antipathogen antibody repertoires in plasma obtained before and after natural and experimental MV infections. We found that measles is associated with large reductions in both the diversity of the antibody repertoire and magnitude of the binding signal, likely reflecting reduced antibody titers resulting from diminished numbers of cells producing the respective antibody. The reduction of diversity may be greater than we report because even if particular antibody-producing cells have been eliminated, an antibody half-life of ~3 weeks (35) means that residual antibodies were still detectable at the time of sampling. Our findings show that after recovery from MV infections, individuals enter a state in which immune functionality is restored, but memory cell elimination induced by measles may alter previously acquired memory.
MV can infect 20 to 70% of memory cells, including B cells, T cells, and plasma cells in the lymphoid tissue and peripheral blood during the first 3 to 10 days after infection (7, 10, 24). Clinical trials of systemic administration of engineered MV for oncolytic therapy of multiple myeloma also demonstrated efficient entry of MV into the bone marrow and plasma cell infection (36). In wild-type MV infections, lymphocytes undergo rapid proliferation during immune activation (37), and lymphocyte counts (and other immunological markers) return to normal levels within weeks of infection. Thus, the immunological toll of measles is often considered limited to that period. After experimental MV infection in monkeys, we found that we could no longer detect up to 60% of the antibody repertoire, and this persisted for at least 5 months. This loss could be permanent, owing to elimination of B cells as well as LLPCs (11), although we cannot rule out possible involvement of additional unknown pleiotropic effects that may also cause antibody-secreting cells to down-regulate antibody production. Furthermore, because T cells also express SLAM and are infected by MV, T cell immunity may be diminished through similar mechanisms, and this could explain the loss of cutaneous tuberculin reactions after measles (5). Lasting remissions of autoimmune-related disorders after measles have been detected by researchers since the 1940s (38), supporting the potential persistence of immune suppression and pointing to persistent long-term effects. Because LLPCs are terminally differentiated and do not replicate (39), the rebuilding of immune memory after measles-induced LLPC elimination would likely require reexposures, either through natural infection or vaccination; thus it could potentially take months or years to return the immune repertoire back to baseline for all relevant pathogens. During the rebuilding process, individuals would potentially be at increased risk for other infectious diseases. Revaccination with routine childhood vaccines after measles could help to mitigate long-term suffering that might stem from immune amnesia and subsequent increased susceptibility to other infections.
We previously reported evidence that measles epidemics link to population mortality 2 to 3 years later (15, 40). We hypothesized that the observed dynamics could potentially be explained by an immunomodulatory effect of measles, similar to what we show here. We found no such debilitative effects for the live MMR vaccine (15). Furthermore, because, in the prevaccine era, MV infected nearly all children within the first decade of life, the vaccine may have contributed to considerably greater benefits by preventing measles and immune amnesia. By preserving immunity, measles vaccines may have reset overall baseline morbidity and mortality rates to lower levels (15).
Given the variation in the degree of immune repertoire modulation we observed, we anticipate that future risk of morbidity and mortality after measles would not be homogeneous but would be skewed toward individuals with the most severe elimination of immunological memory. These findings underscore the crucial need for continued widespread vaccination. More than 7 million people are estimated to have been infected with measles in 2018 (1–3). Comprehensive coverage with MV vaccine would not only help prevent the >120,000 deaths that will be directly attributed to measles this year, but, by preventing MV immune amnesia and thus preserving immunity, MV vaccines could also avert potentially hundreds of thousands of additional deaths attributable to the lasting damage to the immune system. The WHO recently reported that between 2000 and 2017, MV vaccines have prevented more than 21 million deaths directly attributable to measles (41). These findings suggest that the number of deaths averted might be much greater, and they attest to the immense public health value of the measles vaccine.
Data and materials availability:
The VirScan library is available under a material transfer agreement. Data are available in the main text, the supplementary materials, or on Dryad (42).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We express our gratitude to the participants, including children, parents, school staff, and other volunteers, who provided time and samples for this work. We also thank B. T. Grenfell and C. J. E. Metcalf for their early insights into this work and E. Shrock for assistance with assays.
Funding: This work was supported by a grant from the Value of Vaccine Research Network to S.J.E. and M.J.M.; a grant from the Gates Foundation to S.J.E.; an NIH/NIAID U24 grant to H.B.L. and S.J.E.; a grant from the European Union Seventh Framework Program (grant 202063) and a grant from the Academy of Finland (Centre of Excellence in Molecular Systems Immunology and Physiology; grant 250114) to M.K.; NIH R01 DK032493 to M.R.; NIH R21 AI095981 and R01 AI131228 to D.E.G.; and a grant from PREPARE Europe (EU FP7 grant 602525) to R.L.d.S. S.J.E. is an Investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Footnotes
Competing interests: M.S.W. and D.F.C. are employees of Genentech. S.J.E. is a founder of TSCAN Therapeutics, MAZE Therapeutics, and Mirimus. S.J.E. serves on the scientific advisory boards of CRISPR Therapeutics, Homology Medicines, TSCAN Therapeutics, and XChem and is an adviser for MPM Capital, none of which affect this work. M.J.M. has served as a member of Sanofi advisory board for RSV therapeutics. D.E.G. is a member of the GlaxoSmithKline Vaccine Research and Development Advisory Board. S.J.E., T.K., and H.B.L. are inventors on a patent application filed by The Brigham and Women’s Hospital (US20160320406A) that covers the use of the VirScan library to identify pathogen antibodies in blood. All other authors declare no competing interests.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.Dabbagh A et al. , MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep 67, 1323–1329 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organization, New measles surveillance data for 2019 (2019); www.who.int/immunization/newsroom/measles-data-2019/en/.
- 3.Portnoy A et al. , Lancet Glob. Health 7, e472–e481 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goodridge HS et al. , Nat. Rev. Immunol 16, 392–400 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pirquet C, Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr 34, 1297–1300 (1908). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Griffin DE, Immunol. Rev 236, 176–189 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.de Swart RL et al. , PLOS Pathog 3, e178 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tatsuo H, Ono N, Tanaka K, Yanagi Y, Nature 406, 893–897 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hahm B, Arbour N, Oldstone MB, Virology 323, 292–302 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.de Vries RD et al. , PLOS Pathog 8, e1002885 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.De Salort J, Sintes J, Llinàs L, Matesanz-Isabel J, Engel P, Immunol. Lett 134, 129–136 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Laksono BM et al. , J. Virol 92, e00131–18 (2018).29437964 [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ryon JJ, Moss WJ, Monze M, Griffin DE, Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol 9, 994–1003 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tamashiro VG, Perez HH, Griffin DE, Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J 6, 451–453 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mina MJ, Metcalf CJE, de Swart RL, Osterhaus ADME, Grenfell BT, Science 348, 694–699 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.de Vries RD, de Swart RL, PLOS Pathog 10, e1004482 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Isnard P et al. , Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 116, 10899–10904 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Halliley JL et al. , Immunity 43, 132–145 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hammarlund E et al. , Nat. Commun 8, 1781 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Amanna IJ, Carlson NE, Slifka MK, Engl N. J. Med 357, 1903–1915 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pescovitz MD et al. , J. Allergy Clin. Immunol 128, 1295–1302.e5 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hill J et al. , Blood Adv 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000717 (2019). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gadroen K et al. , BMJ Open 8, e021465 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Laksono BM et al. , Nat. Commun. 9, 4944 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xu GJ et al. , Science 348, aaa0698 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Larman HB et al. , Nat. Biotechnol 29, 535–541 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.van Binnendijk RS, van der Heijden RW, van Amerongen G, UytdeHaag FG, Osterhaus AD, J. Infect. Dis 170, 443–448 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.de Swart RL et al. , NPJ Vaccines 2, 22 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Coughlin MM, Beck AS, Bankamp B, Rota PA, Viruses 9, 11 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Moss WJ, Griffin DE, Nat. Rev. Microbiol 4, 900–908 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mina MJ, McCullers JA, Klugman KP, mBio 5, e01040–13 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mina MJ, Klugman KP, Lancet Respir. Med 2, 750–763 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cole R, J. Am. Med. Assoc 70, 1147–1153 (1918). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nelson AN et al. , Sci. Rep 7, 11474 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hinton PR et al. , J. Immunol 176, 346–356 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dispenzieri A et al. , Leukemia 31, 2791–2798 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Griffin DE, Ward BJ, Jauregui E, Johnson RT, Vaisberg A, Engl N. J. Med 320, 1667–1672 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Blumberg RW, Cassady HA, Am. J. Dis. Child. 73, 151–166 (1947). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Slifka MK, Antia R, Whitmire JK, Ahmed R, Immunity 8, 363–372 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mina MJ, Grenfell BT, Metcalf CJE, Science 365, eaax6498 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.World Health Organization, Measles fact sheet (2019); www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/measles.
- 42.Mina MJ, Elledge SJ, Measles Immune Amnesia: Data and Code for Mina et al. Science 2019, Dryad; (2019); 10.5061/dryad.5tb2rbp0j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.