Skip to main content
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene logoLink to The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
. 2021 Jul 8;105(3):622–626. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0136

A Novel Luminescence-Based Serum Bactericidal Assay for Vibrio cholerae Reduces Assay Variation, Is Time- and Cost-Effective, and Directly Measures Continuous Titer Values

Taylor A Wahlig 1, Ben J Brintz 2, Melanie Prettyman 1, Andrew S Azman 3, Daniel T Leung 1,4,*
PMCID: PMC8592349  PMID: 34237020

ABSTRACT.

Cholera remains a significant public health burden worldwide, and better methods for monitoring cholera incidence would enhance the effectiveness of public health interventions. The serum bactericidal assay (SBA) has been used extensively for Vibrio cholerae vaccine assessments and serosurveillance. Current SBA approaches for V. cholerae rely on colony enumeration or optical density (OD600nm) readings to measure viable bacteria following complement-mediated lysis. These methods provide titer values that are constrained to discrete dilution values and rely on bacterial outgrowth, which is time consuming and prone to variation. Detection of bacterial proteins following complement-mediated lysis presents a faster and potentially less variable alternative approach independent of bacterial outgrowth. Here, we present an SBA that measures luciferase luminescence driven by lysis-released adenylate kinase. This approach is faster and less variable than growth-dependent SBAs and directly measures continuous titer values. This novel SBA method can potentially be applied to other bacteria of interest.

INTRODUCTION

The serum bactericidal assay (SBA) is an effective tool for determining levels of functional antibodies in serum. The SBA is traditionally performed by generating dilutions of heat-inactivated serum from the study subject, which are then incubated with exogenous complement. The amount of cell lysis induced by antibody and complement can then be measured by enumeration of viable colonies, bacterial outgrowth, or measurement of bacterial lysis products. Colony enumeration SBAs have been developed for a variety of pathogens, but require overnight incubations and time-consuming plating and enumeration.16 Incorporation of automated plating and counting technologies can increase throughput, but overnight incubations are often still required.711 Plating and overnight incubations can be avoided through the use of the microtiter plate SBA, which measures bacterial outgrowth directly in the microtiter plate used for serum dilutions. Bacterial growth can be measured by optical density (OD600nm) or through colorimetric metabolic indicators.1217 Determining titer through OD600nm or metabolic indicator reduces total assay time, but variations in bacterial outgrowth can impact titer determination.

Measuring bacterial lysis products offers an alternative approach that does not require overnight incubation and is not impacted by variation in bacterial outgrowth. Serum bactericidal assays measuring extracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) as a proxy for bacterial lysis have been developed for several pathogens.1821 In addition to ATP, adenylate kinase activity, which catalyzes the reaction 2 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) ←→ ATP + adenosine monophosphate (AMP), can also be used as a proxy for cell lysis.22,23 Levels of extracellular adenylate kinase released during cell lysis can be measured through the addition of exogenous ADP, luciferin, and luciferase (Figure 1). Lysis-released adenylate kinase converts the added ADP to ATP, which then drives quantifiable luciferase luminescence.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Overview of luminescence-based serum bactericidal assay. (A) Up to eight serum samples are diluted in 2-fold dilutions across a microtiter plate and incubated with Vibrio cholerae cells and guinea pig complement. (B) Anti-cholera antibodies attach to bacterial antigen and membrane attack complex from guinea pig complement lyses bacterial cells. (C) Lonza ToxiLight reagent containing adenosine diphosphate (ADP), luciferin, and luciferase is added to wells. Lysis-released adenylate kinase converts 2ADP to adenosine monophosphate (AMP) + adenosine triphosphate (ATP), which drives luciferase luminescence. This figure appears in color at www.ajtmh.org.

Cholera remains a significant public health burden worldwide, causing millions of cases and tens of thousands of deaths annually.24 Despite their shortcomings, colony enumeration and microtiter plate SBAs remain standard assays for use in Vibrio cholerae vaccine assessment and serosurveillance and are the only assays available to assess correlate of protection against V. cholerae infection.6,2529 To address the inter- and intra-assay variability and low throughput of the microtiter plate SBA method, our goal was to develop an alternative approach, through the measurement of lysis-released adenylate kinase. This luminescence-based approach reduces assay time, cost, and variability, while increasing throughput and directly measures continuous titer values.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, growth, and storage.

Vibrio cholerae Ogawa O1 (strain X-25049) was used in all experiments. Vibrio cholerae Ogawa O1 stocks were stored at −80°C in Luria Bertani (LB) broth with 20% glycerol. Overnight cultures were grown in LB broth inoculated directly from glycerol stocks and incubated at 37°C with shaking (180 rpm).

Preparation of serum.

Healthy donor serum was purchased from a commercial source (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Deidentified clinic-collected serum samples were collected from healthy adult volunteers at the University of Utah. Deidentified field-collected samples were collected as part of a study of cholera patients in Haiti (gift from Dr. J. Glenn Morris, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL). Deidentified pre- and post-vaccine samples (gift from Dr. David Sack, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, Baltimore, MD) were collected prior to, and at 8 and 14 days after, vaccination of a healthy adult volunteer with a live oral cholera vaccine. Healthy donor serum and clinic-collected sera were filtered with a 0.22-μm filter. Clinic-collected sera were used without dilution following filter sterilization. Field-collected and pre- and postvaccine sera were diluted 1:10 in saline and were not filter sterilized. All serum samples were incubated at 56°C for 30 minutes to inactivate endogenous complement. Monoclonal anti-O-specific polysaccharide antibody used in all spiked sera experiments was provided as a gift by Dr. Jason Harris, Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA).30 For titer drift experiments, monoclonal anti-OSP antibody was added in four different concentrations (serum A–D) to pooled healthy donor serum. For comparison of OD600nm and luminescence assay experiments, monoclonal anti-OSP antibody was added to pooled healthy donor serum and three dilutions (1:4, 1:8, 1:16) were performed in healthy donor serum. Stocks of each dilution of spiked serum were aliquoted for use in optical density and luminescent SBAs, stored at −20°C, and used immediately after thawing. Clinic-collected, field-collected, and pre- and postvaccine deidentified serum samples were used for unspiked serum experiments.

Optical density-based serum bactericidal assay.

Luria Bertani broth was inoculated 1:100 with overnight V. cholerae Ogawa O1 culture and incubated for 3 hours at 37°C with shaking (180 rpm). Cells were collected by centrifugation and washed twice with 0.9% saline. Cell pellets were resuspended in 0.9% saline to OD600nm = 0.3. Growth indicator solution was prepared in 0.9% saline with 10% guinea pig complement (Sigma Aldrich) and 5% OD600nm = 0.3 bacterial suspension. Transparent 96-well plates were prepared by serially diluting serum by 2-fold dilutions in 0.9% saline. Growth indicator solution was added 1:1 to wells with serum dilutions and positive growth controls containing 0.9% saline. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour with shaking (60 rpm). Luria Bertani media was added 3:1 to all wells, and plates were incubated at 37°C with shaking (60 rpm). Optical density at 600 nm was read every 10 minutes after 1 hour and 40 minutes of incubation, until the average of the positive growth controls was above OD600nm = 0.2. Titers were determined to be the reciprocal of the serum dilution with the OD600nm closest to half of the average of the positive growth control OD600nm.

Luminescence-based serum bactericidal assay.

Luria Bertani broth was inoculated 1:100 with overnight V. cholerae Ogawa O1 culture and incubated for 3 hours at 37°C with shaking (180 rpm). Cells were collected by centrifugation and washed twice with 0.9% saline. Cell pellets were resuspended in 0.9% saline to OD600nm = 0.3. Growth indicator solution was prepared in 0.9% saline with 10% guinea pig complement (Sigma Aldrich) and 5% OD600nm = 0.3 bacterial suspension. White-walled 96-well plates were prepared by serially diluting serum by 2-fold dilutions in 0.9% saline. Growth indicator solution was added 1:1 to wells with serum dilutions. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 1 hour with shaking (60 rpm). ToxiLight BioAssay reagent (Lonza, Morristown, NJ) was prepared according to manufacturer protocol and added 2:1 to all wells. Plates were developed for 30 minutes and luminescence was read on a Biotek Synergy H1M plate reader (Winooski, VT). For Max/2 titer calculations, titers were determined to be the reciprocal of the serum dilution closest to half of the maximal luminescence observed. For lethal dose 50% (LD50) titer calculations, percent maximal luminescence was calculated by dividing all luminescence values by the maximal luminescence value. Values under 15% were excluded, and remaining values were plotted on a log2 scale. An exponential line was fit to the data and the LD50 titer was calculated using the equation of the line, with the y value set to 50. Max/2 and LD50 titer calculation examples are provided in the supplemental protocol.

Calculation of assay cost.

The cost of all reagents and consumables was obtained from manufacturer websites and adjusted to the cost per assay. Cost was calculated assuming the OD600nm SBA was performed in technical duplicate with three patient samples per plate, and the luminescence SBA was performed with eight patients per plate. Labor cost was calculated assuming a technician is paid $15/hr and can prepare six plates simultaneously.

Statistical analysis.

The χ2 test was used to compare the agreement of technical replicates between OD600nm and luminescence methods. Coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated between trials using titer values determined from averaged technical duplicate wells. To ensure all titer calculations could be performed without experience with more sophisticated analysis programs, all titer calculations were performed in Microsoft Excel, as shown in the supplemental protocol.

RESULTS

Impact of incubation time on titer in OD600nm SBA.

Titers were determined using optical density for four spiked serum samples (serums A–D) after 2, 2.5, 3, and 3.5 hours of incubation (Table 1). The titers of serum A, B, and C decreased 2-fold between 2 hours (512, 256, and 64, respectively) and 3 hours (256, 128, and 32, respectively). The titer of serum D decreased 2-fold every 0.5 hours, from 16 to 1, over the course of 1.5 hours.

Table 1.

Titers of four spiked serum samples read at four time points

2 hours 2.5 hours 3 hours 3.5 hours
Serum A titer 512 512 256 256
Serum B titer 256 256 128 128
Serum C titer 64 64 32 32
Serum D titer 16 8 4 1
Growth control OD600nm 0.213 0.253 0.246 0.247

OD = optical density.

The luminescence-based SBA has lower inter- and intra-assay variability and directly measures continuous titer values.

Titers were determined for spiked serum and 1:4, 1:8, and 1:16 dilutions of spiked serum using OD600nm, Max/2 luminescence, and LD50 luminescence approaches (Table 2). The luminescence-based SBA has lower inter- and intra-assay variability and provides direct measurement of continuous titer values. Titers were determined for spiked serum and 1:4, 1:8, and 1:16 dilutions of spiked serum using OD600nm, Max/2 luminescence, and LD50 luminescence. Average titer values decreased with dilution for OD600nm (341, 107, 43, 27), Max/2 luminescence (256, 107, 64, 32), and LD50 luminescence (280, 98, 54, 32) approaches. The average of the OD600nm titers for the four serum dilutions tested had greater CV percentage (43.3%, 34.6%, 43.3%, 34.6%) than the average of three of four Max/2 titers (0%, 34.6%, 0%, 0%) and all of the average LD50 titers (2.5%, 1%, 7.7%, 10.2%). Variation between technical replicates was also evaluated by comparing titers of individual technical replicates. OD600nm technical replicates had greater disagreement (6 of 27 replicates disagreed) than luminescence technical replicates calculated with the Max/2 approach (1 of 27 replicates disagreed). This difference was statistically significant at P < 0.05 without Yates correction (χ2statistic = 4.1, P = 0.04) and had a P value of 0.11 with Yates correction (χ2 statistic = 2.6).

Table 2.

Comparison of titers calculated from OD-based vibriocidals and luminescence-based vibriocidals using healthy donor serum spiked with anti-OSP monoclonal antibody

OD600nm Max/2 luminescence LD50 luminescence
Spiked serum 256, 512, 256* 256, 256, 256 280, 273, 287
1:4 serum 64, 128, 128 64, 128, 128 97, 98, 99
1:8 serum 32, 64, 32 64, 64, 64 51, 59, 53
1:16 serum 16, 32, 32 32, 32, 32 28, 33, 34

LD = lethal dose; OD = optical density.

*

Titer values from three independent trials

The luminescence SBA can be used for field-collected and pre- and postvaccine sera and is complement specific.

Clinic-collected sera from two donors with previously known positive cholera SBA titers based on OD600nm SBA analysis, seven field-collected sera from Haiti, and a pre- and postvaccine serum sample were tested using the OD600nm SBA and the luminescence SBA (Table 3). The Max/2 luminescence approach and the LD50 luminescence approach provided titer values for all serum samples tested and most values agreed with the OD600nm titer or were within a 2-fold dilution. To determine background signal produced from serum and complement specificity, sera from three separate donors was tested using the luminescence SBA with and without complement (Supplemental Table 1). Serum wells without complement had reduced signal across all dilutions and background signal from the sera did not exceed 10% of the signal in titer-determining, complement-containing wells.

Table 3.

Titers calculated from OD-based vibriocidals and luminescence-based vibriocidals using unspiked donor serum

Serum donor OD600nm Max/2 luminescence LD50 luminescence
Clinical donor 1* 16 16 39
Clinical donor 2 512 512 623
Field donor 1* 10 20 32.3
Field donor 2 40 160 185
Field donor 3 80 160 187
Field donor 4 20 40 58
Field donor 5 640 640 800
Field donor 6 640 2560 2120
Field donor 7 640 1280 2080
Prevaccine 10, 10 20, 20 34, 35
Postvaccine day 8** 40, 40 80, 80 104, 85
Postvaccine day 14 320, 320 640, 640 751, 826
*

Clinic-collected samples were filter sterilized and used undiluted.

Field-collected samples were used unfiltered and diluted 1:10.

Pre- and postvaccine samples were used unfiltered, diluted 1:10, and tested in two independent replicates.

The luminescence SBA is more time- and cost-effective.

Total time to perform the luminescence SBA (5 hours) was less than the time required to complete the OD600nm SBA (7–8 hours) and the estimated cost per sample for the luminescence SBA ($11.82) was less than the estimated cost per sample for the OD600nm SBA ($19.63).

DISCUSSION

Colony enumeration and optical density SBAs have been used extensively for V. cholerae vaccine assessment and serosurveillance,6,2529 as the SBA has been shown to be the best serologic marker for protection and prior infection. Although these assays have provided valuable data, the colony enumeration approach is resource- and time-intensive, and the OD600nm approach is prone to variability and drifting titer values (Table 1). Thus, our goal was to develop a method that addresses these deficiencies. By measuring levels of adenylate kinase released following complement-mediated cell lysis, the luminescence-based SBA avoids additional bacterial culturing and the time, resources, and variability associated with it. The luminescence SBA was used to calculate titers across a range of common values, and we demonstrated it could be used to test filtered sera, for situations where sterility is a concern, and unfiltered sera, for situations where serum volume is limited.

The variability in the OD600nm SBA has traditionally required serum samples to be tested in technical duplicate; however, technical replicates showed greater agreement in the luminescence SBA as compared with the OD600nm assay, potentially allowing for testing of samples with a single replicate test well. Although we acknowledge the value of testing in technical duplicate, the increase in throughput and decrease in cost provided by testing in singlet may be beneficial in settings with limited resources. Additionally, the OD600nm SBA traditionally leaves the edge wells of the microtiter plate empty due to edge well growth variation, which limits plate capacity to three samples, if testing in duplicate. As the luminescence SBA does not rely on bacterial outgrowth, all of the wells of the microtiter plate can be used without concern for edge well growth effects. This increases the throughput of the luminescence SBA to eight samples per plate in singlet, in comparison to three samples per plate in duplicate for the OD600nm SBA. The increase in number of samples per plate and the reduction in reagent and consumable usage from elimination of technical replicates reduce the estimated cost of the luminescence SBA to $11.82 per sample, compared with $19.63 per sample for the OD600nm SBA (Table 4), despite requiring an additional detection reagent. A potential up-front cost in performing the luminescence SBA is a plate reader equipped with a luminometer; however, many plate readers used for OD600nm measurements are already equipped with a luminometer and there are a number of affordable luminometer options if a laboratory was not already equipped with one.

Table 4.

Comparison of optical density SBA and luminescence SBA

Optical density Luminescence
Cost/sample* $19.63 $11.82
Assay time 7–8 hours 5 hours
Samples/plate 3–4 8
Values provided Discrete Discrete or continuous

SBA = serum bactericidal assay.

*

Cost per sample includes all required reagents and consumables and assumes a technician paid at $15/hr can run six plates simultaneously. Cost was calculated with optical density plates containing three samples in technical duplicate and luminescence plates containing eight samples.

The luminescence SBA provides an additional advantage by producing data with increased resolution. Although traditional SBA approaches provide titer values that are constrained to discrete dilutions (i.e., interval censored), the luminescence-based approach allows for the direct measurement of continuous titer values. This approach allows for more accurate determination of titer. This is illustrated in the titer values for the 1:4 antibody dilution in Table 2. Replicates of the OD600nm titer values (64, 128, 128) were either higher or lower than the LD50 titer values (97, 98, 99), which could represent a more accurate measure of the true titer of the sample. Increasing the resolution of the data provided by the SBA will enhance vaccine development and serosurveillance efforts by providing more accurate titer values.

Determining titer by measuring the levels of lysis-released adenylate kinase could be applied to a variety of pathogens for which traditional SBA approaches are being used. The luminescence SBA could be particularly useful for bacteria with slow growth rates or challenging culture conditions. The reduced variability and ability to directly measure continuous titer values make this approach a more robust and accurate alternative to current approaches.

Supplemental material

Supplemental materials

tpmd210136.SD1.pdf (848KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to acknowledge Md. Saruar Bhuiyan and Ioana Pop for technical assistance and discussion. We also thank Dr. Jason Harris, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, for providing monoclonal anti-OSP antibody; Dr. Robert Campbell, PhD, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, for providing deidentified clinic-collected healthy volunteer samples; Dr. David Sack, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, for providing deidentified pre- and postvaccine samples; and Dr. J. Glenn Morris, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, for providing deidentified field samples. Illustrations were created using Biorender.

Note: Supplemental material appears at www.ajtmh.org.

References

  • 1.Boyd MA, Tennant SM, Saague VA, Simon R, Muhsen K, Ramachandran G, Cross AS, Galen JE, Pasetti MF, Levine MM, 2014. Serum bactericidal assays to evaluate typhoidal and nontyphoidal Salmonella vaccines. Clin Vaccine Immunol 21: 712–721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Corbeil LB, Wunderlich AC, Ito JI, McCutchan AJ, 1978. Plaque assay for measuring serum bactericidal activity against gonococci. J Clin Microbiol 8: 618–620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Martin D, McCallum L, Glennie A, Ruijne N, Blatchford P, O’Hallahan J, Oster P, 2005. Validation of the serum bactericidal assay for measurement of functional antibodies against group B meningococci associated with vaccine trials. Vaccine 23: 2218–2221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Muschel LH, Treffers HP, 1956. Quantitative studies on the bactericidal actions of serum and complement: I. a rapid photometric growth assay for bactericidal activity. J Immunol 76: 1–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Townsend K, Ladhani SN, Findlow H, Borrow R, 2014. Evaluation and validation of a serum bactericidal antibody assay for Haemophilus influenzae type b and the threshold of protection. Vaccine 32: 5650–5656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Attridge SR, Qadri F, Albert MJ, Manning PA, 2000. Susceptibility of Vibrio cholerae O139 to antibody-dependent, complement-mediated bacteriolysis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 7: 444–450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jang MS, Sahastrabuddhe S, Yun C, Han SH, Yang JS, 2016. Serum bactericidal assay for the evaluation of typhoid vaccine using a semi-automated colony-counting method. Microb Pathog 97: 19–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Liu X, Wang S, Sendi L, Caulfield MJ, 2004. High-throughput imaging of bacterial colonies grown on filter plates with application to serum bactericidal assays. J Immunol Methods 292: 187–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nahm MH, Yu J, Weerts HP, Wenzel H, Tamilselvi SC, Chandrasekaran L, Pasetti MF, Mani S, Kaminski RW, 2018. Development, Interlaboratory evaluations, and application of a simple, high-throughput Shigella serum bactericidal assay. mSphere 3: 1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Weerts HP, Yu J, Kaminski RW, Nahm MHA, 2019. A high-throughput Shigella-specific bactericidal assay. J Vis Exp 144: 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yang JS Kim HJ Yun C Kang S Im J Kim H Han SH, 2007. A semi-automated vibriocidal assay for improved measurement of cholera vaccine-induced immune responses. J Microbiol Methods 71: 141–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ayalew S, Confer AW, Shrestha B, Payton ME, 2012. A rapid microtiter plate serum bactericidal assay method for determining serum complement-mediated killing of Mannheimia haemolytica. J Microbiol Methods 89: 99–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sharma SK, Fatma T, Thukral SS, 1999. A simple and rapid serum bactericidal assay and its evaluation in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Microbiol Methods 39: 45–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Rouphael NG, Satola S, Farley MM, Rudolph K, Schmidt DS, Gomez-de-leo P, Robbins JB, Schneerson R, Carlone GM, Romero-Steiner S, 2011. Evaluation of serum bactericidal antibody assays for Haemophilus influenzae serotype a. Clin Vaccine Immunol 18: 243–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mountzouros KT, Howell AP, 2000. Detection of complement-mediated antibody-dependent bactericidal activity in a fluorescence-based serum bactericidal assay for group B Neisseria meningitidis. J Clin Microbiol 38: 2878–2884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Romero-Steiner S, Spear W, Brown N, Holder P, Hennessy T, de Leon PG, Carlone GM, 2004. Measurement of serum bactericidal activity specific for Haemophilus influenzae type b by using a chromogenic and fluorescent metabolic indicator. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 11: 89–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rodriguez T, Lastre M, Cedre B, del Campo J, Bracho G, Zayas C, Taboada C, Diaz M, Sierra G, Perez O, 2002. Standardization of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B colorimetric serum bactericidal assay. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9: 109–114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Necchi F, Saul A, Rondini S, 2017. Development of a high-throughput method to evaluate serum bactericidal activity using bacterial ATP measurement as survival readout. PLoS One 12: e0172163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Necchi F, Saul A, Rondini S, 2018. Setup of luminescence-based serum bactericidal assay against Salmonella Paratyphi A. J Immunol Methods 461: 117–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rossi O, Molesti E, Saul A, Giannelli C, Micoli F, Necchi F, 2020. Intra-laboratory evaluation of luminescence based high-throughput serum bactericidal assay (L-SBA) to determine bactericidal activity of human sera against Shigella . High Throughput 9: 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Clow F, O’Hanlon CJ, Christodoulides M, Radcliff FJ, 2019. Feasibility of using a luminescence-based method to determine serum bactericidal activity against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Vaccines (Basel) 7: 191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jacobs AC, Didone L, Jobson J, Sofia MK, Krysan D, Dunman M, 2013. Adenylate kinase release as a high-throughput-screening-compatible reporter of bacterial lysis for identification of antibacterial agents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57: 26–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dzeja P, Terzic A, 2009. Adenylate kinase and AMP signaling networks: metabolic monitoring, signal communication and body energy sensing. Int J Mol Sci 10: 1729–1772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ali M, Nelson AR, Lopez AL, Sack DA, 2015. Updated global burden of cholera in endemic countries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9: e0003832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Attridge SR, Johansson C, Trach DD, Qadri F, 2002. Sensitive microplate assay for detection of bactericidal antibodies to Vibrio cholerae O139. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9: 383–387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Azman AS. et al. , 2019. Estimating cholera incidence with cross-sectional serology. Sci Transl Med 11: 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Richie E. et al. , 2000. Efficacy trial of single-dose live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in North Jakarta, Indonesia, a cholera-endemic area. Vaccine 18: 2399–2410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tacket CO. et al. , 1999. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentered trial of the efficacy of a single dose of live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in preventing cholera following challenge with Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor Inaba three months after vaccination. Infect Immun 67: 6341–6345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Boutonnier A, Dassy B, Dumenil R, Guenole A, Ratsitorahina M, Migliani R, Fournier J, 2003. A simple and convenient microtiter plate assay for the detection of bactericidal antibodies to Vibrio cholerae O1 and Vibrio cholerae O139. J Microbiol Methods 55: 745–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kauffman RC. et al. , 2016. Single-cell analysis of the plasmablast response to Vibrio cholerae demonstrates expansion of cross-reactive memory B cells. mBio 7: 1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental materials

tpmd210136.SD1.pdf (848KB, pdf)

Articles from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene are provided here courtesy of The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

RESOURCES