Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Nov 15;16(11):e0259444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259444

Acute effects of the different relaxation periods during passive intermittent static stretching on arterial stiffness

Yuya Higaki 1, Yosuke Yamato 1,2, Shumpei Fujie 1, Kenichiro Inoue 1,3, Mio Shimomura 1, Shosaku Kato 1, Naoki Horii 1,3, Shigehiko Ogoh 4, Motoyuki Iemitsu 1,*
Editor: Vincenzo Lionetti5
PMCID: PMC8592493  PMID: 34780500

Abstract

To clarify whether the relaxation period during stretching affects the degree of elevated shear rate and the degree of reduction of arterial stiffness, we examined relaxation duration to build an adequate stretching protocol. In Experiment 1, the changes in cardiac output, the shear rate in the posterior tibial artery, and blood volume in the calf muscle were measured during recovery (0–60 s) from a single bout of one-legged passive calf stretching in 12 healthy young men. In Experiment 2, the effects of different relaxation periods (5-, 10-, 20-, and 60-s) of passive one-legged intermittent calf stretching (30-s × 6 sets) on the femoral-ankle pulse wave velocity (faPWV) as an index of peripheral arterial stiffness were identified in 17 healthy young men. As a result, the stretched leg’s shear rate significantly increased from 0 to 10th s after stretching. The muscle blood volume in the stretched leg significantly reduced during stretching, and then significantly increased during the recovery period after stretching; however, cardiac output remained unchanged during stretching and recovery. Additionally, the reduction in faPWV from the pre-stretching value in the stretched leg was significantly larger in the protocol with 10-s and 20-s relaxation periods than that in the non-stretched leg, but this did not differ in the 5-s and 60-s relaxation periods. These findings suggest that the relaxation periods of intermittent static stretching that cause a high transient increase in shear rate (via reperfusion after microvascular compression by the stretched calf muscles) are effective to reduce arterial stiffness.

Introduction

Increased arterial stiffness is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, a main causal factor of mortality worldwide [1,2]. Interestingly, habitual static stretching mitigates arterial stiffness [35]; thus, it has the potential to prevent cardiovascular events. Our previous studies demonstrated that even a single bout of whole-body static stretching acutely reduced systemic arterial stiffness [6]. Moreover, this decrease in arterial stiffness occurs only in the lower limb arteries of the stretched limb, but not in the non-stretched leg, indicating that changes in mechanical factors, rather than the hemodynamics caused by stretching induced the decrease in arterial stiffness [7]. Thus, we could expect chronic repetition of stretch stimulation to possibly lead to low basal arterial stiffness; however, the mechanism of static stretching-induced decrease in arterial stiffness remains unclear.

Continuous high shear stress (e.g., shear rate) on endothelial cells induces vasodilation with increased nitric oxide (NO) production, an endothelial-derived relaxation factor [8]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that low arterial stiffness is associated with vasodilation via endothelial functions [9]. Venturelli et al. [10] observed that acute passive quadriceps intermittent stretching, composed of 15-s relaxation after 45-s static stretching, increased blood flow in the femoral artery of the stretched leg, indicating the possibility that stretching may increase the shear rate and induce vasodilation via endothelial function. Our recent study demonstrated that acute passive one-legged calf intermittent stretching (30-s × 6 sets) significantly increased shear rate as well as blood flow in the posterior tibial artery of the stretched leg during a 10-s relaxation period after stretching, when compared to that before stretching [11]. These findings suggest that intermittent calf stretching increases shear rate during the relaxation period and consequently decreases arterial stiffness. It is noteworthy that a single bout of passive 4-min continuous calf stretching increased shear rate as well as blood flow in the popliteal artery until 15 s after stretching and returned to the baseline around 60 s after stretching [12], indicating that different relaxation periods may modify the degree of reduction in arterial stiffness as well as change in shear rate.

Increased blood flow and shear rate in the lower limb arteries of the stretched limb may be included by an increase in central circulation (cardiac output [CO]) during stretching [10,12], because an increase in central circulation is related to increased blood flow and shear rate in the peripheral arteries [13,14]. Additionally, on investigating the dynamics of blood volume in skeletal muscles, it was found that ischemic reperfusion after stretching may also be involved in the increased blood flow and shear rate after stretching [12]. Given this background, we hypothesized that changes in central circulation or different relaxation periods of intermittent stretching affect the degree of increase in shear rate, and consequently determines the degree of reduction in arterial stiffness. In the present study, to test our hypothesis, we examined time-course changes in blood flow and shear rate in the posterior tibial arteries of passive calf-stretched and non-stretched legs, especially during 30-s stretching and 60-s relaxation periods (Experiment 1, Exp. 1). In addition, we measured CO and muscle blood volume to examine the effect of central and peripheral circulation on the stretching-induced increase in shear rate. Moreover, to identify the effects of the different relaxation durations of intermittent stretching on arterial stiffness, we measured pulse wave velocity (PWV) as an index of arterial stiffness in the stretched leg in 5-, 10-, 20-, and 60-s relaxation periods of acute passive one-legged intermittent calf stretching protocol in healthy young men (Experiment 2, Exp. 2). These investigations may provide important information to build an adequate stretching protocol to efficiently reduce arterial stiffness.

Methods

Experiment 1

Subjects

Twelve healthy young men (age, 22.8 ± 0.3 years; height, 174.1 ± 1.7 cm; weight, 65.1 ± 1.6 kg; body mass index, 21.6 ± 0.5 kg/m2) participated in this study. Participants were recruited by flyers and poster placed on the local community. None of the participants habitually exercised (e.g., aerobic and/or resistance training), had cardiovascular disease, were smokers, or used prescription or over-the-counter medications. All participants provided written, informed consent before their participation in this study, which was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ritsumeikan University and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Experimental design

All participants refrained from caffeine, alcohol, and strenuous physical activity for 24 h, which was followed by a 6-hour fast (water could be taken during the fast). The height and body weight (InBody770; Inbody Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea) were then measured (Fig 1A). The diameter and mean blood velocity in the posterior tibial artery, the heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), blood pressures, and total hemoglobin (Hbtot) as an index of blood volume in the stretched skeletal muscle were measured in the supine position after at least 30 min of rest. Posterior tibial artery diameter, mean blood velocity, HR, SV, and Hbtot were measured in the supine position during stretching and till 60 s after stretching. Additionally, blood pressures were measured 60 s after stretching. To normalize the concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin and myoglobin (O2Hb) and the concentration of deoxygenated hemoglobin and myoglobin (HHb), a pneumatic cuff placed proximal to a near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) sensor was inflated for 5 min, followed by rest for 3 min after release. The posterior tibial artery diameter, mean blood velocity, HR, SV, and Hbtot were measured continuously and calculated every 5 s for each point. The room temperature was maintained at 24 ± 1°C during the experiment.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Design of experiments 1 (A) and 2 (B). In Experiment 1, blood pressure is measured before stretching (Pre) and after stretching (Post). Peripheral (artery diameter, mean blood velocity, blood flow, shear rate) and central (heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output) hemodynamics and muscle blood volume (total hemoglobin) are measured during the stretching session. In Experiment 2, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), femoral-ankle PWV (faPWV), heart rate, blood pressures are measured at Pre and Post. low frequency (LF)/high frequency (HF) is measured for 1-min immediately before and after stretching.

Stretching protocol

A single bout of passive one-legged calf static stretching was passively held for 30 s at the end range (point of minimal discomfort), followed by a 60-s rest period. In each participant, the stretched and non-stretched legs were randomized. The investigator passively moved the ankle joint of the stretched leg slowly (for at least 5 s) through the full range of motion. In contrast, the non-stretched leg was not moved.

Measurements of peripheral hemodynamics, HR, SV, and blood pressures

Measurements of the posterior tibial artery diameter and mean blood velocity were performed in the passively stretched and non-stretched legs, behind the malleolus medialis of the tibia, using the Vivid S6 and q ultrasound system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA). Each Vivid S6 and q ultrasound system was equipped with a linear array transducer operating at an imaging frequency of 10 MHz. Posterior tibial artery diameter was determined at an angle perpendicular to the central axis of the scanned area with B-mode imaging. Blood velocity was measured using the PW mode of the same probe at a frequency of 4.2 MHz. All blood velocity measurements were obtained with the probe appropriately positioned to maintain an insonation angle of ≤ 60°. The sample volume was maximized according to the vessel size and centered within the vessel based on real-time ultrasound visualization. The arterial diameter was measured, and mean blood velocity values were automatically calculated using the available software (Vivid S6 and q). The diameter and mean blood velocity were used to calculate the posterior tibial artery blood flow and shear rate. Blood flow was calculated as: mean blood velocity × π (vessel diameter/2)2 × 60 [11,12,15], where blood flow was measured in milliliters per minute (mL/min). Shear rate (per second), a useful estimator of shear stress that does not account for blood viscosity, was defined as: [4 × mean blood velocity]/vessel diameter [11,12,15]. The aortic diameter and blood velocity were measured using the LOGIQ S7 ultrasound system (GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA). HR was automatically calculated using the LOGIQ S7 software before, during, and after the stretching session. The LOGIQ S7 ultrasound system was equipped with a sector scanner transducer operating at an imaging frequency of 2.5 MHz. The aortic diameter was measured at end-diastole during three consecutive cardiac cycles by the leading edge-to-leading edge method, and the mean diameter was determined according to a previous study [16]. The time-velocity integral was derived by digitizing the blood velocity curve, as outlined in the second cardiac cycle, according to a previous study [16]. The SV was calculated as: time-velocity integral × π (aortic diameter/2)2; and CO was calculated as: SV × HR at each point [16]. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured using an automatic blood pressure measuring device (HEM-762; OMRON, Kyoto, Japan) at the right brachial artery immediately before and after the stretching session.

Measurements of blood volume of gastrocnemius medialis muscle

Microvascular O2Hb and HHb were measured using a frequency-domain phase modulation near-infrared spectrophotometer (NIRO-200NX; Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Shizuoka, Japan) at the medial head of the gastrocnemius muscle in the stretched leg. The NIRS probe was placed at one-third the distance between the popliteal crease and the medial malleolus and held in place by elastic tape. NIRS provides continuous, non-invasive monitoring of the relative concentration changes of Hbtot (O2Hb + HHb) as an index of muscle blood volume before, during, and after stretching. Hbtot was assessed at baseline after a 30-min rest, followed by a single bout of stretching of the gastrocnemius muscle. Simultaneously, Hbtot was assessed before, during, and after stretching every 5 s. To normalize the O2Hb and HHb for each subject, a pneumatic cuff (AG101 & E20; D.E. Hokanson Inc., Bellevue, USA) was placed proximal to the NIRS sensor and inflated to 250 mmHg for 5-min, or until O2Hb and HHb reached a plateau, and rested for 3-min after release [12]. The highest value of O2Hb after release was defined as 100%, and the minimum value during ischemia was defined as 0%. The lowest value of HHb after release was defined as 0%, and the maximum value during ischemia was defined as 100%. NIRS measurements of O2Hb and HHb before, during, and after the stretching session were then calculated as relative percent concentration changes of Hbtot.

Statistical analysis

Values are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). Two-way (leg × time) repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the posterior tibial artery diameter, mean blood velocity, blood flow, and shear rate. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA was performed on SV, HR, CO, and Hbtot. If measurements at each time point were significantly different, Fisher’s post hoc test was applied. The t-test was used to compare blood pressures before and after stretching. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using StatView 5.0 (SAS Institute, Tokyo, Japan). Using an alpha error of 0.05, a power (1-β) of 0.80, the effect size of 0.25 [17], the number of groups of 2, and the number of measurements of 20, a sample size resulted in five subjects (G*Power 3.1).

Experiment 2

Subjects

Seventeen healthy young men (age, 23.1 ± 0.4 years; height, 173.5 ± 1.4 cm; weight, 67.7 ± 2.3 kg; body mass index, 22.5 ± 0.8 kg/m2) participated in this study. Participants were recruited by flyers and poster placed on the local community. None of the participants habitually exercised (e.g., aerobic and/or resistance training), had cardiovascular disease, were smokers, or used prescription or over-the-counter medications. All participants provided written, informed consent before their participation in the study, which was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ritsumeikan University and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Experimental design

All participants refrained from caffeine, alcohol, and strenuous physical activity for 24 h, which was followed by a 6-hour fast (water could be taken during the fast). The height and body weight (InBody770; Inbody Co., Ltd.) were measured, and a sit-and-reach test (T.K.K.5112; Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) was performed (Fig 1B). PWV, blood pressures, HR, and low frequency (LF)/high frequency (HF) as an index of sympathetic nerve activity were measured in the supine position after at least 30-min of rest (Pre) and 1-min immediately after stretching (Post). The room temperature was maintained at 24 ± 1°C during the experiment.

Stretching protocol

The participants experienced a single session of passive one-legged calf static stretching, as previously described [11]. In this study, stretching was passively held for 30 s at the end range (point of minimal discomfort), followed by 5-, 10-, 20-, or 60-s relaxation periods for six repetitions. In each participant, the stretched and non-stretched legs, and the order in which relaxation period conditions were performed, were randomized. The investigator passively moved the ankle joint of the stretched leg slowly (at least 5 s) through the full range of motion. In contrast, the non-stretched leg was not moved.

Measurements of PWV, blood pressures, and HR

Bilateral brachial and ankle blood pressures, PWV, and HR were concurrently measured using a vascular testing device (form PWV/ABI; Omron Colin, Kyoto, Japan). Bilateral brachial and posterior tibial arterial pressure waveforms were observed using oscillometric pressure sensors wrapped on both arms and ankles. Femoral arterial pressure waveforms were acquired by placing an applanation tonometry sensor on the left femoral artery, as previously described [6,7,18]. Electrocardiogram electrodes were fixed on both wrists, and a microphone was positioned on the left edge of the sternum to measure the HR. PWV was calculated as the distance between two arterial measuring sites divided by the transit time. The transit time was determined from the time delay between the proximal and distal “foot” waveforms. The foot of the wave was identified as the point of commencement of the sharp systolic upstroke, which was observed automatically. The following PWVs were assessed: brachial-ankle PWV (baPWV) as an index of systemic arterial stiffness, and femoral-ankle PWV (faPWV) as an index of peripheral arterial stiffness.

Heart rate variability assessment

HR variability (HRV) was continuously measured using an R-R monitor (Polar V800, Poral Electro, Kempele, Finland) for 1 min immediately before and after stretching. The sensor-measured HRV was placed at the front of the chest using an exclusive band. The acquired data were analyzed using Kubios HRV Standard version.3.3 (Kubios, Kuopio, Finland). The area underneath the spectral bands within the range of 0.04–0.15 Hz was defined as LF, and the area underneath the spectral band within the range of 0.15–0.40 Hz was defined as HF. LF/HF, as an index of parasympathetic activity, was calculated before and immediately after stretching.

Statistical analysis

Values are expressed as mean ± SE. A three-way (leg × time × condition) repeated-measures ANOVA was performed on the baPWV, faPWV, and blood pressures. A two-way (time × condition) repeated-measures ANOVA was performed on the HR, LF/HF, sit-and-reach test. A two-way (leg × condition) repeated-measures ANOVA was performed on the amount of change in faPWV [(faPWV after stretching)–(faPWV before stretching)] of the stretched and non-stretched legs. If measurements of each condition were significantly different, Fisher’s post-hoc test was applied. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using StatView 5.0 (SAS Institute). Using an alpha error of 0.05, a power (1-β) of 0.80, the effect size of 0.25 [17], the number of groups of 2, and the number of measurements of 4, a sample size resulted in eleven subjects (G*Power 3.1). Cohen’s d was calculated to evaluate the effect size between the 5-s relaxation period and other periods in the amount of change in faPWV in the stretched leg (G*Power 3.1).

Results

Experiment 1

Response to blood pressures before and after stretching

Brachial systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) did not differ between immediately before and after the stretching session (SBP: pre, 112.8 ± 1.9 mmHg; post, 110.8 ± 1.5 mmHg; DBP: pre, 69.4 ± 2.0 mmHg, post, 67.3 ± 1.2 mmHg).

Response to peripheral hemodynamics before, during, and after stretching

The posterior tibial artery diameter in the stretched leg was significantly reduced during 5 s to 30 s of stretching (5 s, P = 0.010; 10 s, P = 0.003; 15 s, P = 0.006; 20 s, P = 0.004; 25 s, P = 0.003; 30 s, P = 0.004), and significantly increased 40 s after stretching compared to that during pre (P = 0.039) (Fig 2A). It also significantly reduced during 5 s to 30 s of stretching (5 s, P = 0.003; 10 s, P < 0.001; 15 s, P = 0.002; 20 s, P = 0.009; 25 s, P = 0.003; 30 s, P = 0.001), and significantly increased 20 s to 55 s after stretching (20 s, P = 0.022; 25 s, P = 0.012; 30 s, P = 0.012; 35 s, P = 0.002; 40 s, P < 0.001; 45 s, P = 0.012; 50 s, P = 0.008; 55 s, P = 0.018) compared to that in the non-stretched leg (Fig 2A; interaction, P < 0.0001). The posterior tibial artery mean blood velocity in the stretched leg was significantly increased 0 to 10 s after stretching compared to that during pre (P < 0.0001) (Fig 2B). It also significantly reduced at 5-s and 20-s during stretching (5-s, P = 0.042; 20-s, P = 0.042), and significantly increased 0 to 10 s after stretching (0 s, P = 0.014; 5 s, P = 0.009; 10 s P = 0.019) compared to that in the non-stretched leg (Fig 2B; interaction, P < 0.0001). The posterior tibial artery blood flow in the stretched leg was significantly increased at 0 to 10-s and 30-s after stretching compared to that during pre (0 s, P = 0.034; 5 s, P = 0.002; 10 s, P = 0.010; 30 s, P = 0.047) (Fig 2C). It also significantly reduced during 5 s to 30 s of stretching (5 s, P = 0.018; 10 s, P = 0.013; 15 s, P = 0.012; 20 s, P = 0.001; 25 s, P = 0.008; 30 s, P = 0.003), and significantly increased at 0 to 10-s, 20-s, and 40-s after stretching (0 s, P = 0.049; 5 s, P = 0.035; 10 s, P = 0.047; 20 s, P = 0.028; 40 s, P = 0.016) compared to that in the non-stretched leg (Fig 2C; interaction, P < 0.01). The posterior tibial artery shear rate in the stretched leg was significantly increased 0 to 10 s after stretching compared to that during pre (0 s, P = 0.001; 5 s, P < 0.001; 10 s, P < 0.001) (Fig 2D). It also significantly reduced at 5-s to 30-s during stretching (5 s, P = 0.017; 10 s, P = 0.030; 15 s, P = 0.032; 20 s, P = 0.003; 25 s, P = 0.013; 30 s, P = 0.008), and significantly increased at 0 to 10 s, and 20 s after stretching (0 s, P = 0.030; 5 s, P = 0.019; 10 s, P = 0.030; 20 s, P = 0.030) compared to that in the non-stretched leg (Fig 2D; interaction, P < 0.0001).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Artery diameter (A), mean blood velocity (B), blood flow (C), and shear rate (D) of the posterior tibial artery before, during, and after passive one-legged calf stretching. Pre, before stretching; * P < 0.05 vs. Pre, † P < 0.05 vs. Non-stretched leg. Data are presented as mean ± SE.

Response to central hemodynamics before, during, and after stretching. SV, HR, and CO did not change during and after stretching (Fig 3A–3C).

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Stroke volume (A), heart rate (B), and cardiac output (C) before, during, and after passive one-legged calf stretching. Pre, before stretching; Data are presented as mean ± SE.

Response to Hbtot before, during, and after stretching. Hbtot was significantly reduced at 5 s to 30 s during stretching (5 s, P = 0.049; 10 s, P = 0.031; 15 s, P = 0.029; 20 s, P = 0.020; 25 s, P = 0.020; 30 s, P = 0.028) and significantly increased 5-s to 60-s after stretching (5 s, P = 0.039; 10 s, P = 0.031; 15 s, P = 0.042; 20 s, P = 0.036; 25 s, P = 0.039; 30 s, P = 0.037; 35 s, P = 0.048; 40 s, P = 0.039; 45 s, P = 0.032; 50 s, P = 0.029; 55 s, P = 0.026; 60 s P = 0.023) compared to pre-stretching (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Total hemoglobin (Hbtot) of the gastrocnemius muscle in the stretched leg before, during, and after passive one-legged calf stretching.

Fig 4

Pre, before stretching; * P < 0.05 vs. Pre. Data are presented as mean ± SE.

Experiment 2

Next, we performed Exp. 1 to investigate the effect of arterial stiffness on different relaxation periods after stretching.

Response to blood pressures, baPWV, faPWV, HR, and LF/HF before and after stretching. Blood pressures, baPWV, faPWV, HR, and LF/HF did not differ between before and after stretching, under all conditions of relaxation (Tables 1 and 2). The amount of change in faPWV in the stretched leg was significantly reduced in the 10-s and 20-s relaxation periods compared to that in the non-stretched leg (Fig 5; 10-s, P = 0.011; 20-s, P = 0.002), but did not differ between stretched and non-stretched legs in the 10- and 20-s relaxation periods. Additionally, the amount of change in faPWV in the stretched leg was significantly reduced in the 10-s, 20-s, and 60-s relaxation periods compared to that in the 5-s relaxation period (10-s: P = 0.022, d = 0.95; 20-s: P < 0.001, d = 1.54; 60-s: P = 0.007, d = 0.86) (Fig 5).

Table 1. Blood pressures, baPWV, and faPWV before (Pre) and after (Post) passive one-legged calf stretching.

5-sec 10-sec 20-sec 60-sec
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
bSBP (mmHg)  
Con 110 ± 3 111 ± 2 109 ± 2 109 ± 2 110 ± 2 109 ± 1 109 ± 2 109 ± 2
Stretch 108 ± 2 109 ± 2 111 ± 2 110 ± 2 109 ± 2 108 ± 1 109 ± 2 108 ± 2
bDBP (mmHg)
Con 62 ± 3 62 ± 2 61 ± 1 62 ± 2 62 ± 1 61 ± 2 62 ± 2 63 ± 3
Stretch 62 ± 2 61 ± 2 62 ± 1 62 ± 2 61 ± 2 60 ± 1 63 ± 2 62 ± 2
aSBP (mmHg)
Con 126 ± 3 127 ± 3 127 ± 2 127 ± 3 125 ± 3 126 ± 3 126 ± 2 127 ± 3
Stretch 125 ± 3 127 ± 3 124 ± 3 126 ± 3 127 ± 2 126 ± 3 121 ± 2 124 ± 2
aDBP (mmHg)
Con 65 ± 2 65 ± 2 67 ± 2 66 ± 2 63 ± 2 64 ± 2 67 ± 2 68 ± 2
Stretch 66 ± 3 66 ± 2 65 ± 2 64 ± 2 64 ± 2 65 ± 2 65 ± 2 66 ± 2
baPWV (cm/sec)
Con 1035 ± 27 1036 ± 28 1035 ± 27 1020 ± 29 1028 ± 24 1011 ± 27 1030 ± 22 999 ± 23
Stretch 1034 ± 31 1032 ± 29 1037 ± 29 1000 ± 28 1045 ± 28 1001 ± 29 1052 ± 21 1011 ± 26
faPWV (cm/sec)
Con 854 ± 23 862 ± 24 853 ± 27 849 ± 29 862 ± 26 851 ± 27 846 ± 26 822 ± 24
Stretch 855 ± 29 857 ± 26 857 ± 29 829 ± 28 881 ± 32 838 ± 29 868 ± 23 835 ± 27

5-sec, condition of relaxation period 5-sec: 10-sec, condition of relaxation period 10-sec: 20-sec, condition of relaxation period 20-sec: 60-sec, condition of relaxation period 60-sec: Pre, before stretching: Post, 1-min immediately after stretching: bSBP, branchial systolic blood pressure: bDBP, brachial diastolic blood pressure: aSBP, ankle systolic blood pressure: aDBP, ankle diastolic blood pressure: baPWV, brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity: faPWV, femoral-ankle pulse wave velocity: Con, non-stretch side: Stretch, stretch side; Data are presented as mean±SE.

Table 2. HR and LF/HF before (Pre) and after (Post) passive one-legged calf stretching.

5-sec 10-sec 20-sec 60-sec
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
HR (beats/min) 52.9 ± 1.5 52.5 ± 1.6 51.3 ± 1.4 51.4 ± 1.7 52.6 ± 1.6 51.9 ± 1.4 52.7 ± 1.5 51.8 ± 1.5
LF/HF 2.0 ± 0.3 1.5 ± 0.3 1.1 ± 0.2 2.2 ± 0.7 1.8 ± 0.5 3.0 ± 0.9 2.1 ± 0.6 3.1 ± 1.1

5-sec, condition of relaxation period 5-sec: 10-sec, condition of relaxation period 10-sec: 20-sec, condition of relaxation period 20-sec: 60-sec, condition of relaxation period 60-sec: Pre, before stretching: Post, 1-min immediately after stretching: HR, heart rate: LF, low frequency: HF, high frequency; Data are presented as mean±SE.

Fig 5. Amount of change in faPWV before and after passive one-legged calf stretching.

Fig 5

5-s, condition of 5-s relaxation; 10-s, condition of 10-s relaxation; 20-s, condition of 20-s relaxation; 60-s, condition of 60-s relaxation; faPWV, femoral-ankle pulse wave velocity; * P < 0.05 vs. 5-s, † P < 0.05 vs. Non-stretched leg. Data are presented as mean ± SE.

Response to sit-and-reach test before and after the stretching. Sit-and-reach test under all conditions did not differ between before and after stretching (5-s relaxation period: Pre, 40.3 ± 1.5 cm; Post, 38.8 ± 1.7 cm; 10-s relaxation period: Pre, 39.0 ± 1.7 cm, Post, 38.6 ± 1.8 cm; 20-s relaxation period: Pre, 41.4 ± 1.5 cm, Post, 40.9 ± 1.5 cm; and 60-s relaxation period: Pre, 40.5 ± 1.8 cm, Post, 40.1 ± 1.8 cm).

Discussion

In Exp. 1 of the present study, we revealed that the blood flow and shear rate in the posterior tibial artery increased from the baseline immediately (10 s) after 30 s of stretching. However, the CO and blood pressures were not affected by stretching. These findings indicate that mild ischemia-reperfusion was caused mechanically by the stretching calf muscles rather than by central hemodynamics, and consequently, it may have induced the increases in blood flow and shear rate in the posterior tibial artery of the stretched leg. Additionally, in Exp. 2, the PWV after acute passive one-legged intermittent calf stretching (30 s × 6 sets) was decreased in the protocols using relaxation periods of 10 s to 20 s but not in those using short (5 s) or long relaxation periods (60 s). These findings suggest that the degree of decrease in arterial stiffness in the intermittent stretching protocol is likely due to a degree of increased shear rate, which is determined by the relaxation duration of the intermittent stretching protocol.

In this study, the blood flow and shear rate in the posterior tibial artery increased from the 0 to 10 s after stretching. Furthermore, the acute passive calf intermittent static stretching protocol (30 s × 6 sets) using 10- and 20-s relaxation periods induced a reduction in arterial stiffness in the stretched leg, but this was not seen in the protocol using 5-s and 60-s relaxation periods. These findings indicate that intermittent stretching-induced arterial stiffness and arterial shear rate are likely affected by the relaxation period. Thus, the intermittent stretching protocol should use adequate relaxation time to achieve a greater shear rate and to thus obtain a greater reduction in arterial stiffness.

Continuous high shear stress (rate) on endothelial cells acutely causes the release of NO via activation of endothelial NO synthase [8,1921], leading to reduction of arterial stiffness with vasodilation [22]. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD), as an index of endothelial function, was identified during the rapid increase in blood flow caused by reperfusion after forearm ischemia, and it is well established that during this measurement, the shear rate acutely increases immediately after reperfusion, and afterwards, the peak increase in arterial diameter for the FMD value occurs around 20 s to 30 s after reperfusion [9]. In other words, there is a time lag between the increase in shear rate and peak vasodilation (~ 40 s) [23]. Similarly, in the present study, a reduction in arterial stiffness occurred after an increase in the shear rate, indicating that the relaxation duration that achieved a higher shear rate likely caused the higher reduction in arterial stiffness. Therefore, the stretching-induced reduction in arterial stiffness may be related to vasodilation via increased shear rate. A recent study has shown that chronic one-legged stretching increased popliteal artery FMD in the stretched leg followed by an increase in that in the non-stretched leg [5]. The acute stretching in this study affected only the stretching leg. Therefore, the local effect of the acute stretching on the whole body may occur later.

An increase in central circulation is related to an increase in vasodilation and a reduction in arterial stiffness in the peripheral arteries [13,14]. For example, it has been reported that increased central hemodynamics lead to peripheral vasodilation via the arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreflex, and this autonomic function-induced peripheral vasodilation results in a reduction of peripheral arterial stiffness [24]. Indeed, acute intermittent stretching-induced increase in central hemodynamics have been shown to increase blood flow in the stretch legs during the relaxation duration [10]. However, in this study, the blood flow in the posterior tibial arteries increased for 10 s after the 30-s passive calf intermittent static stretching, but significant changes in HR and CO were not observed during both the stretching and relaxation periods. This result is consistent with our previous study [11], which reported no change in HR during the stretching and relaxation periods in the same 30-s passive calf intermittent static stretching. Moreover, this study showed that parasympathetic activity, estimated by LF/HF, did not change before and after the acute passive calf intermittent static stretching (30 s × 6 sets) which used different relaxation periods, and it concomitantly did not alter HR, SBP, and DBP. These findings suggest that the increase in peripheral blood flow and shear rate after passive calf intermittent static stretching may be caused by a local mechanism, independent of central hemodynamics and autonomic function. Therefore, the difference in peripheral arterial stiffness responses to the different relaxation periods after stretching is independent of central hemodynamics and is related autonomic regulation.

Kruse et al. [25] reported that the blood volume of the gastrocnemius muscle decreased during stretching of the plantar flexors. Similarly, in this study, the blood volume in the gastrocnemius muscle of the calf-stretched leg decreased during stretching and increased after stretching. In addition, in previous studies, blood flow in the artery distal to the site of occlusion increased with the increase in blood flow in the vascular bed after the release of arterial occlusion [26]. Based on these findings, we speculate that static stretching may compress the capillaries of the stretched muscle and cause congestion, and release this congestion after stretching, resulting in increased blood flow to the vascular bed of the muscle. Indeed, in this study, the diameter of the posterior tibial artery was reduced during stretching, and subsequently, blood flow in the posterior tibial artery increased after stretching. Thus, the stretch-induced mild occlusion in the gastrocnemius muscle may contribute to increased blood flow in the posterior tibial artery and increase blood flow to the vascular bed in the gastrocnemius muscle after stretching. However, further investigations are needed to address this important speculation to identify the mechanism of stretch-induced reduction in arterial stiffness. Additionally, in this study, the value of the sit-and-reach test did not differ between before and after the stretching, therefore, it was not an accurate test to assess the effect of flexibility by calf static stretching. Therefore, further study needs to examine measuring the range of motion of the ankle joint after calf static stretching.

In conclusion, the degree of decrease in arterial stiffness in the intermittent stretching protocol is associated with the relaxation duration rather than central hemodynamics because the relaxation duration modifies the shear rate. Thus, the relaxation duration should be considered while building an adequate stretching protocol to efficiently reduce arterial stiffness.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset

(XLSX)

S2 Dataset

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the participants in this study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its uploaded Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (KAKENHI: 19K22828 for M. Iemitsu). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015;385:117–171. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, Gautier I, Laloux B, Guize L, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2001;37:1236–1241. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.37.5.1236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nishiwaki M, Yonemura H, Kurobe K, Matsumoto N. Four weeks of regular static stretching reduces arterial stiffness in middle-aged men. Springerplus. 2015;4:555. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1337-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shinno H, Kurose S, Yamanaka Y, Higurashi K, Fukushima Y, Tsutsumi H, et al. Evaluation of a static stretching intervention on vascular endothelial function and arterial stiffness. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017;17:586–592. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1284267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bisconti AV, Cè E, Longo S et al. Evidence for improved systemic and local vascular function after long-term passive static stretching training of the musculoskeletal system. J Physiol. 2020;598:3645–3666. doi: 10.1113/JP279866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yamato Y, Hasegawa N, Sato K, Hamaoka T, Ogoh S, Iemitsu M. Acute effect of static stretching exercise on arterial stiffness in healthy young adults. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95:764–770. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yamato Y, Hasegawa N, Fujie S, Ogoh S, Iemitsu M. Acute effect of stretching one leg on regional arterial stiffness in young men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017;117:1227–1232. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3609-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Corson MA, James NL, Latta SE, Nerem RM, Berk BC, Harrison DG. Phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in response to fluid shear stress. Circ Res. 1996;79:984–991. doi: 10.1161/01.res.79.5.984 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Thijssen DH, Black MA, Pyke KE, Padilla J, Atkinson G, Harris RA, et al. Assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans: a methodological and physiological guideline. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;300:H2–H12. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00471.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Venturelli M, Rampichini S, Coratella G, Limonta E, Bisconti AV, Cè E, et al. Heart and musculoskeletal hemodynamic responses to repetitive bouts of quadriceps static stretching. J Appl Physiol. 2019;127:376–384. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00823.2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yamato Y, Higaki Y, Fujie S, Hasegawa N, Horii N, Aoyama H, et al. Acute effect of passive one-legged intermittent static stretching on regional blood flow in young men. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121:331–337. doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04524-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kruse NT, Silette CR, Scheuermann BW. Influence of passive stretch on muscle blood flow, oxygenation and central cardiovascular responses in healthy young males. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2016;310:H1210–H1221. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00732.2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Green DJ, Hopman MTE, Padilla J, Laughlin MH, Thijssen DHJ. Vascular adaptation to exercise in humans: role of hemodynamic stimuli. Physiol Rev. 2017;97:495–528. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00014.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Carter HH, Spence AL, Ainslie PN, Pugh CJA, Naylor LH, Green DJ. Differential impact of water immersion on arterial blood flow and shear stress in the carotid and brachial arteries of humans. Physiol Rep. 2017;5:e13285. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wray DW, Richardson RS. Aging, exercise, and limb vascular heterogeneity in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1804–1810. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000230342.86870.94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lewis JF, Kuo LC, Nelson JG, Limacher MC, Quinones MA. Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window. Circulation. 1984;70:425–431. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.70.3.425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112:155–159. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yamamoto K, Kawano H, Gando Y, Iemitsu M, Murakami H, Sanada K, et al. Poor trunk flexibility is associated with arterial stiffening. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297:H1314–H1318. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00061.2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Higashi Y, Yoshizumi M. Exercise and endothelial function: role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide and oxidative stress in healthy subjects and hypertensive patients. Pharmacol Ther. 2004;102:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2004.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schmitt M, Avolio A, Qasem A, McEniery CM, Butlin M, Wilkinson IB, et al. Basal NO locally modulates human iliac artery function in vivo. Hypertension. 2005;46:227–231. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000164581.39811.bd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhou J, Li YS, Chien S. Shear stress-initiated signaling and its regulation of endothelial function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:2191–2198. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kobayashi K, Akishita M, Yu W, Hashimoto M, Ohni M, Toba K. Interrelationship between non-invasive measurements of atherosclerosis: flow-mediated dilation of brachial artery, carotid intima-media thickness and pulse wave velocity. Atherosclerosis. 2004;173:13–18. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2003.10.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Evanoff NG, Kelly AS, Steinberger J, Dengel DR. Peak shear and peak flow mediated dilation: a time-course relationship. J Clin Ultrasound. 2016;44:182–187. doi: 10.1002/jcu.22324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kingwell BA, Berry KL, Cameron JD, Jennings GL, Dart AM. Arterial compliance increases after moderate-intensity cycling. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:H2186–H2191. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1997.273.5.H2186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kruse NT, Scheuermann BW. Effect of self-administered stretching on NIRS‐measured oxygenation dynamics. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016;36:126–133. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Agewall S, Doughty RN, Bagg W, Whalley GA, Braatvedt G, Sharpe N. Comparison of ultrasound assessment of flow-mediated dilatation in the radial and brachial artery with upper and forearm cuff positions. Clin Physiol. 2001;21:9–14. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.2001.00302.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Vincenzo Lionetti

31 Aug 2021

PONE-D-21-23457

Acute effects of the different relaxation periods during passive intermittent static stretching on arterial stiffness

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Iemitsu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

All issues raised by reviewers are required.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 15 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Vincenzo Lionetti, M.D., PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In the Methods section of the manuscript, please provide additional information regarding how participants were recruited for both of the experiments within the study.

3. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

4. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

5. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

6. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript is focused on a interesting topic and could have some important practical implication.

The Authors tired to find the best relaxation period to optimise the vascular responsiveness (including measures of shear rare and arterial stiffness) of the tibial posterior artery after an unilateral passive stretching bout of the plantar flexor muscles.

The manuscript is on the whole well-written, the methods are technically sounding and the results adequately reported (although I suggest to use the exact P value and at least one measure of effect size to strengthen the results).

I still have some major questions the Authors should replied:

1) Please include and comment both in the Introduction and in the discussion a recent paper of Bisconti AV et al, J Phyisiol 2020 on this topic.

2) Was an a-prior sample size calculation performed for the two experimental set-up? if so, please include a paragraph.

3) Do the Authors feel that the Sit-and-Reach test would be sensitive enough to detect the changes in ROM after just an unilateral passives stretching bout of the plantar flexors? If not, the Authors should recognise that there is no parameter describing the stretch-induce change in ROM.

4) In the Discussion, please comment on the differences between your and Venturelli et al study.

Reviewer #2: The Authors studied the relationship between the relaxation period during stretching and the reduction of arterial stiffness, in healthy young men. In the first series of experiments they evaluated the changes in cardiac output, the shear rate in the posterior tibial artery and blood volume in the calf muscle during recovery (0-60 s) from a single bout of one-legged passive calf stretching. In the second series of experiments, they assessed the effects of different relaxation periods (5-, 10-, 20-, and 60-s) of passive one-legged intermittent calf stretching (30-s × 6 sets) on the femoral-ankle pulse wave velocity (faPWV) as an index of peripheral arterial stiffness. The results indicate that the stretched leg’s shear rate significantly increased from 0 to 10th s after stretching. The muscle blood volume in the stretched leg significantly decreased during stretching; then significantly increased during the recovery period after stretching. It was interesting that cardiac output remained unchanged during stretching and recovery. Moreover, the reduction in faPWV from the pre-stretching value in the stretched leg was significantly larger in the protocol with 10-s and 20-s relaxation periods than that in the non-stretched leg and in the 5-s and 60-s relaxation periods. The Authors suggest that the relaxation periods of intermittent static stretching causing a high transient increase in shear rate (via reperfusion after microvascular compression by the stretched calf muscles) are effective in reducing arterial stiffness. The study was well planned and the results are really interesting, demostrating that central hemodynamics are not really involved in the response to stretching in calf muscle arteries.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Nov 15;16(11):e0259444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259444.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


27 Sep 2021

RESPONSE TO REFEREES (PONE-D-21-23457R1)

We wish to thank you for your constructive comments and suggestions. We have carefully considered all the comments and revised our manuscript accordingly. Our responses to each comment are as follows:

Reviewer #1:

The manuscript is on the whole well-written, the methods are technically sounding and the results adequately reported (although I suggest to use the exact P value and at least one measure of effect size to strengthen the results).

Response: As you suggested, we have added the exact P values and effect size of the amount of change in faPWV in the Results section of the revised manuscript (Please see Page 12-13 and Page 11, Line 252-256).

(1) Please include and comment both in the Introduction and in the discussion a recent paper of Bisconti AV et al, J Phyisiol 2020 on this topic.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. Accordingly, we have cited and discussed in the Introduction and Discussion sections of the paper of Bisconti AV et al, J Phyisiol 2020 (Please see Page 3, Line 49-50, and Page 17, Line 361-365).

(2) Was an a-prior sample size calculation performed for the two experimental set-up? if so, please include a paragraph.

Response: Thank you for your pointing it out. We have performed a-prior sample size calculation in this study. Therefore, we added these sentences in the Methods section (Please see Page 8, Line 187-189 and Page 11, Line 252-256).

(3) Do the Authors feel that the Sit-and-Reach test would be sensitive enough to detect the changes in ROM after just an unilateral passives stretching bout of the plantar flexors? If not, the Authors should recognise that there is no parameter describing the stretch-induce change in ROM.

Response: Thank you for your comments. As you suggested, in this study, the value of the sit-and-reach test did not differ between before and after the stretching, therefore, it was not an accurate test to assess the effect of flexibility by calf static stretching. Therefore, we have added this study limitation and the sentence of ‘Further study needs to examine measuring the range of motion of the ankle joint after calf static stretching’ in the text (Please see Page 19, Line 399-402).

(4) In the Discussion, please comment on the differences between your and Venturelli et al study.

Response: Thank you for your constructive comments. Accordingly, we have discussed the differences in the Discussion section (Please see Page 17-18, Line 370-372).

Thank you so much for your careful review and all your useful comments. We believe that your all comments improved this manuscript. We hope that you are satisfied with this revision.

Reviewer #2:

The Authors studied the relationship between the relaxation period during stretching and the reduction of arterial stiffness, in healthy young men. In the first series of experiments they evaluated the changes in cardiac output, the shear rate in the posterior tibial artery and blood volume in the calf muscle during recovery (0-60 s) from a single bout of one-legged passive calf stretching. In the second series of experiments, they assessed the effects of different relaxation periods (5-, 10-, 20-, and 60-s) of passive one-legged intermittent calf stretching (30-s × 6 sets) on the femoral-ankle pulse wave velocity (faPWV) as an index of peripheral arterial stiffness. The results indicate that the stretched leg’s shear rate significantly increased from 0 to 10th s after stretching. The muscle blood volume in the stretched leg significantly decreased during stretching; then significantly increased during the recovery period after stretching. It was interesting that cardiac output remained unchanged during stretching and recovery. Moreover, the reduction in faPWV from the pre-stretching value in the stretched leg was significantly larger in the protocol with 10-s and 20-s relaxation periods than that in the non-stretched leg and in the 5-s and 60-s relaxation periods. The Authors suggest that the relaxation periods of intermittent static stretching causing a high transient increase in shear rate (via reperfusion after microvascular compression by the stretched calf muscles) are effective in reducing arterial stiffness. The study was well planned and the results are really interesting, demostrating that central hemodynamics are not really involved in the response to stretching in calf muscle arteries.

Response: Thank you so much for your careful review and all your constructive comments. We hope that you are also satisfied with this revision.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers PONE-D-21-23457R1.docx

Decision Letter 1

Vincenzo Lionetti

20 Oct 2021

Acute effects of the different relaxation periods during passive intermittent static stretching on arterial stiffness

PONE-D-21-23457R1

Dear Dr. Iemitsu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Vincenzo Lionetti, M.D., PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The Authors replied satisfactorily to all my points. In my opinion no further revisions are required.

Reviewer #2: The paper has been improved and can be accepted for publication. The Authors prepared a new manuscript implemented and acceptable. The Authors explained their changes in the text and substantially improved their presentation of the manuscript.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Emiliano Cè

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Vincenzo Lionetti

2 Nov 2021

PONE-D-21-23457R1

Acute effects of the different relaxation periods during passive intermittent static stretching on arterial stiffness

Dear Dr. Iemitsu:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Vincenzo Lionetti

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Dataset

    (XLSX)

    S2 Dataset

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers PONE-D-21-23457R1.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its uploaded Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES