Abstract
Background. Recovery of motor function after stroke appears to be related to the integrity of axonal connections in the corticospinal tract (CST) and corpus callosum, which may both be affected after cortical stroke. Objective. In the present study, we aimed to elucidate the relationship of changes in measures of the CST and transcallosal tract integrity, with the interhemispheric functional connectivity and sensorimotor performance after experimental cortical stroke. Methods. We conducted in vivo diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), resting-state functional MRI, and behavior testing in twenty-five male Sprague Dawley rats recovering from unilateral photothrombotic stroke in the sensorimotor cortex. Twenty-three healthy rats served as controls. Results. A reduction in the number of reconstructed fibers, a lower fractional anisotropy, and higher radial diffusivity in the ipsilesional but intact CST, reflected remote white matter degeneration. In contrast, transcallosal tract integrity remained preserved. Functional connectivity between the ipsi- and contralesional forelimb regions of the primary somatosensory cortex significantly reduced at week 8 post-stroke. Comparably, usage of the stroke-affected forelimb was normal at week 28, following significant initial impairment between day 1 and week 8 post-stroke. Conclusions. Our study shows that post-stroke motor recovery is possible despite degeneration in the CST and may be supported by intact neuronal communication between hemispheres.
Keywords: brain, stroke, corticospinal tract, diffusion magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tractography, behavior
Introduction
Stroke is one of the most prevalent neurological disorders worldwide and one of the main causes of adult disability, affecting almost 17 million people throughout the world.1,2 The majority of stroke survivors experience long-term sensorimotor and cognitive dysfunction. However, in the weeks and months following a stroke, many patients show partial recovery of sensorimotor (or cognitive) functions. In many cases, functional recovery obeys the recently postulated “proportional recovery rule,” which states that patients should reach about 70% of their maximum potential recovery at 3 months post-stroke. 3 Cross-species validity of the proportional recovery rule has recently been demonstrated in a large study with rats recovering from ischemic stroke. 4 However, the proportional recovery rule does not apply invariably, and many patients experience limited or no functional recovery over time. 3 Furthermore, there has been debate in recent articles about the suitability of the proportional recovery rule from a statistical and methodological perspective.5,6 This strongly emphasizes the need for improved understanding of the underlying mechanisms of (spontaneous) functional recovery after stroke and the identification of biomarkers that can accurately predict functional outcome.
Post-stroke functional recovery has been related to reorganization and restoration of surviving ipsi- and contralesional networks in the brain.7-11 A critical factor for functionally effective neuronal reorganization within the motor system appears to be the integrity of axonal connections in the corticospinal tract (CST) and corpus callosum. However, after stroke, these pathways may be structurally or functionally disrupted, thereby directly affecting motor function along with potential for motor recovery in stroke survivors.7,12-15
Structural and functional connectivity can be mapped at a whole brain level with in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, such as diffusion MRI and functional MRI. Diffusion MRI indirectly probes the arrangement of axonal projections from the random diffusion of water molecules in and around axonal fiber bundles.16,17 Diffusion MRI studies in stroke patients have revealed reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) and increased diffusivity values in the ipsilesional CST, indicative of axonal degeneration. Higher FA and lower diffusivity values are associated with improved motor functions at chronic stages.18-21 Also, measures of the intactness of transcallosal tracts have been shown to be predictive of good motor outcome.19,22
Functional connectivity within brain networks may be assessed with resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI), which measures inter-regional temporal correlation of low-frequency spontaneous fluctuations in blood oxygenation level–dependent signals, reflective of neuronal synchronization. Clinical and pre-clinical studies have reported post-stroke loss of functional connectivity, for example, between the left and right motor cortices, which may recover over time, in parallel with recovery of motor function.7,15,22-25 These findings also point toward the importance of transcallosal tracts—and their integrity—for functional recovery.
Despite increasing insights into the importance of CST and transcallosal tracts for motor recovery after stroke, the relationships between stroke injury, motor function, and structural and functional connectivities within the remaining post-stroke motor network remain unknown. In the present study, we aimed to elucidate the relationship of changes in measures of CST and transcallosal tract integrity vs cortical injury, functional connectivity, and motor performance chronically after experimental cortical stroke. To that aim, we acquired in vivo diffusion MRI, and rs-fMRI data, and behavioral scores from rats at week 1, 8, or 28 after unilateral focal stroke in the motor cortex.
Methods
Animals
Ethical approval was given by the Animal Experiments Committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht and the Utrecht University, and experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the European Communities Council Directive.
The present study was performed with 48 adult male Sprague Dawley rats (Charles River, Germany). An overview of animal weights and ages is given in Table 1. Animals were allowed to acclimatize at least 7 days after delivery. Animals were housed under standard conditions with a light/dark cycle of 12/12 hours, with light on time at 7:00 a.m, and ad libitum access to food and water. A power calculation was conducted with Gpower 3.1.5. A sample size (n = 7) per time point was computed based on a t-test for the difference between independent means, with α = .05, power = 80%, and an effect size of 1.5. The effect size was based on FA values in the anterior internal capsule of rats 7 days post-stroke vs control rats without stroke from a previous study. 22 Hence, a total of 25 animals were subjected to experimental stroke surgery. Three animals died as a consequence of stroke surgery before MRI acquisition. MRI was performed in control animals and animals with stroke at 1 week (n = 7 control, n = 8 stroke), 8 weeks (n = 8 control, n = 7 stroke), or 28 weeks (n = 8 control, n = 7 stroke). In addition, each rat underwent behavioral testing (during light-on time) at multiple time points, up to the day of MRI.
Table 1.
Body Weights and Ages of Rats in the Experimental Groups.
| Time point | Body weight at day of stroke onset (g, mean ± SD) | Body weight at day of MRI (g, mean ± SD) | Age at day of MRI (weeks) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke | Stroke | Control | Stroke and Control | |
| Week 1 | 423 ± 16 | 450 ± 19 | 444 ± 8 | 12 |
| Week 8 | 425 ± 19 | 555 ± 19 | 580 ± 54 | 19 |
| Week 28 | 426 ± 21 | 787 ± 49 | 730 ± 89 | 39 |
Abbreviations: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Stroke Model
Photothrombotic stroke was induced in the right sensorimotor cortex of adult male Sprague Dawley rats at 11 weeks of age (n = 25, for body weights see Table 1), as described in the Supplemental Material. Surgery was performed under isoflurane anesthesia supplied in a mixture of O2/air (1/4) (4% for induction; 1.5–2.0% for maintenance). Rats were mechanically ventilated (UNO Micro Ventilator-03, UNO b.v., The Netherlands) through an endotracheal tube (AbbocathTM-T, 14Gx51 mm, ICU Medical, USA). Blood oxygenation and heart rate were continuously monitored (Nonin Medical 8500V pulse oximeter) and body temperature was maintained at 37 ± .5°C.
MRI Acquisition
MRI was performed on a 9.4T horizontal bore Varian MR System (Palo Alto, CA, USA), equipped with a gradient insert with an inner diameter of 12 cm and a maximum gradient strength of 400 mT/m at a rise time of 130 µs. A home-built Helmholtz volume coil (90 mm diameter) and an actively decoupled surface coil (25 mm diameter) were used for excitation and reception, respectively.
For MRI, rats were anesthetized (4% isoflurane induction; 1.5–2.0% isoflurane maintenance in O2/air (1/4)), endotracheally intubated (AbbocathTM-T, 14G × 51 mm, ICU Medical) and mechanically ventilated (TOPO Small Animal Ventilator Kent Scientific). Oxygen saturation, heart rate (Nonin Medical 8600V pulse oximeter), and expired CO2 (Microstream handheld capnograph, Oridion) were continuously measured and kept within physiological range. Temperature was maintained at 37.0 ± .5°C. To minimize motion artifacts, animals’ heads were fixed with ear- and toothbars inside a home-built animal cradle. Rat heads were carefully positioned underneath the surface coil to obtain full coverage of the cerebrum.
Voxel-based shimming was performed on a rectangular voxel covering the cerebrum and a small fraction of the olfactory bulb and cerebellum, using gradient-echo 3D shimming. Directly following shimming, inspired isoflurane levels were reduced to 1.5% and the imaging protocol was started.
The imaging protocol consisted of anatomical imaging, rs-fMRI, and diffusion MRI. Anatomical images were acquired using a balanced steady-state free precession sequence with an isotropic spatial resolution of 250 μm (see Supplemental Material for parameter settings).
Resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) was performed using a single-shot 3D gradient-echo EPI sequence with an isotropic spatial resolution of 600 μm (see Supplemental Material for parameter settings).
Right after rs-fMRI, the inspired isoflurane level was increased to 2% and maintained until the end of the MRI protocol. Diffusion MRI was executed with a 4-shot 2D spin-echo EPI sequence with diffusion-weighting (see Supplemental Material for parameter settings). For each acquisition, 2 equivalent b0 images without diffusion-weighting were also obtained.
MRI Data Processing
Acquired MR images were post-processed with FSL 5.0 software. 26
Anatomical Imaging–Lesion Segmentation
The brain voxels in the anatomical images were extracted. 27 Images were corrected for signal inhomogeneities and registered to the brain scan of one reference rat from the 1 week stroke group, with affine transformation (FLIRT)28,29 followed by non-linear transformation (FNIRT). 30 Brain lesions were manually segmented in the aligned anatomical images using FSLview. Subsequently, a lesion incidence map was calculated.
Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Tractography
Brain voxels in the diffusion scans were extracted, based on the b0 images. 27 Next, FSL’s DTIFIT was used to calculate FA, mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) from the masked diffusion data. Images from 2 control animals at 1 week were excluded from further analyses because of poor image quality. Deterministic diffusion tensor-based whole-brain tractography was performed in MRtrix3, 31 generating 250.000 streamlines with a step size of 25 μm, an FA threshold ≥ .3 and an angle threshold of 30° (Supplemental Figure 1). Procedures for image registration are described in the Supplemental Material.
To select the left and right CST from the 250.000 streamlines, inverse transformations were applied to register the bilateral internal capsule and striatum (consisting of caudate putamen and globus pallidus atlas regions) back from the reference space to individual animal space.28,29 Additionally, bilateral brain stem (approximately −7 mm posterior from bregma) and optic fiber (approximately −1.5 mm from bregma) regions were manually outlined for each individual animal, which were used to include or exclude streamlines, respectively. The internal capsule also served to include streamlines in the CST selection process. Only streamlines that passed the brain stem and internal capsule were included. In many rats, some streamlines deviated and bent away from the main bundle towards the optic tract. These streamlines were excluded using a manually drawn exclusion area. Next, parts of streamlines that went through the striatum were excluded (i.e., masked out) for further analysis. As a last step, spurious “sprouting” streamlines were manually removed from the CST segmentations (Supplemental Figure 1).
To select the anterior transcallosal tracts, which contain interhemispheric connections between sensorimotor regions, we manually extended the bilateral primary motor (M1) regions in the reference space (ventral direction only), resulting in M1 regions that include underlying white matter. Inverse transformations were applied to register the extended bilateral M1 regions and corpus callosum back from the reference space into individual animal space using FLIRT and FNIRT.28,29 We selected all streamlines that passed through the bilateral extended M1 regions and the corpus callosum. Streamlines were cut off at the outside borders of the bilateral M1 regions. The position of the resulting CST and transcallosal tracts are shown as overlays on the lesion incidence map in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Lesion incidence map and segmented tracts overlaid on anatomical rat brain images at one week post-stroke. Anatomical rat brain images of coronal slices from anterior (left) to posterior (right). Lesion incidence is scaled from 1 (dark red) to 8 (yellow), indicating the number of rats with a lesion in that particular region. The bilateral CST (green) and transcallosal tracts (blue) reconstructions are also shown. CST, corticospinal tract.
Along-tract analysis was performed to obtain the average FA, MD, AD, and RD along left and right CSTs as well as the transcallosal tract. In addition, we also determined the number of streamlines for the left and right CST, and the transcallosal tract. One DTI dataset of a control rat at 1 week could not be included as it was not saved due to a scanner-related problem. Another DTI dataset of a control rat at 1 week had to be excluded because of bad image quality. Resulting group sizes were ncontrol = 6, nstroke = 8 (at 1 week), ncontrol = 8, and nstroke = 7 (at 8 weeks) and ncontrol = 8 and nstroke = 7 (at 28 weeks).
Resting-State Functional Connectivity
The first 20 images of the rs-fMRI time-series were discarded to ascertain steady-state. Next, motion correction was performed to the mean image using FSL’s MCFLIRT, and motion correction parameters were used for regression of the motion-corrected images using FSL’s fsl_glm. The time-series was then bandpass-filtered between .01 and .1 Hz using AFNI’s 3dFourier tool.
Rs-fMRI images were first registered to a reference rat brain (see Supplemental Material), followed by registration to the Paxinos and Watson rat brain atlas,32,33 from which we selected 16 regions of interest (ROIs), that is, the bilateral caudate putamen, M1, secondary motor cortex (M2), forelimb and hindlimb regions of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1FL and S1HL, respectively), secondary somatosensory cortex, thalamus, and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). A temporal-signal-to-noise (tSNR) mask was obtained from the masked motion-corrected rs-fMRI time-series for each rat, by calculating tSNR images and subsequent thresholding of these images at values ≥ 10. The resulting tSNR mask was applied to the selected ROIs, and seed-based Fisher’s z-transformed functional connectivity maps and matrices were calculated from the motion-corrected and regressed rs-fMRI time-series for each rat. Group-average tSNR maps are shown in Supplemental Figure 2.
Seed-based functional connectivity maps with contralesional forelimb or hindlimb regions of the primary somatosensory cortex as seed regions were used to assess data quality. Four datasets were excluded because of major artifacts in the functional connectivity maps (one stroke animal at week 1 and three control animals at week 8). One additional dataset could not be included as it was not saved due to a scanner-related problem (control week 1). Resulting group sizes were ncontrol = 6 and nstroke = 7 (at 1 week), ncontrol = 5 and nstroke = 7 (at 8 weeks), and ncontrol = 8 and nstroke = 7 (at 28 weeks).
Sensorimotor Function Test
Animals were placed in a transparent Perspex vertical cylinder (20 cm diameter, 30 cm height), which was positioned on a horizontal elevated transparent Perspex plate. Videos of the animal were acquired with a video camera (Panasonic HC V520) located underneath the cylinder. We aimed to record 20 paw placements at minimum. The video analysis procedure is described in the Supplemental Material.
For each animal, the first 20 paw placement scores were included for calculation of the forelimb-use score. Subsequently, sum scores were calculated for the paw placements, resulting in a total paw placement score for “left” (PPleft), “right” (PPright), and “both” (PPboth). Forelimb use, expressed as the percentage usage of the left (impaired) forelimb (LF), was calculated according to the following equation
Statistical Analyses
All statistical analyses and visualization were performed in R 3.2 (http://www.r-project.org/), using the packages ggplot2, plyr, and reshape2. We used two-way ANOVA to test changes over time and differences between groups (i.e., stroke vs controls) in behavior, diffusion parameters, and functional connectivity. Post-hoc analysis was performed using the post-hoc Tukey test. We used Pearson’s correlation coefficient to determine the relationship between diffusion parameters, interhemispheric functional connectivity and behavior at the day of MRI. All statistical tests were corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) method. Results with a FDR-corrected P-value < .05 were regarded as significant. For correlation analyses with behavioral measurements, we used the average of post-stroke day 1 and week 1 data as first post-stroke behavioral performance score.
Results
Brain Lesion
Unilateral cortical lesions were evident on anatomical MRI scans at 1 week post-stroke. Lesion incidence maps are depicted in Figure 1 and Supplemental Figure 3, showing the limited inter-subject variance of the lesion location. The mean (±SD) lesion volumes were 34.9 ± 10.9 mm3, 13.8 ± 3.8 mm3, and 6.0 ± 2.6 mm3 at 1, 8, and 28 weeks post-stroke, respectively. Gradual reduction of photothrombotically induced lesion volume on MRI has been reported before and can be explained by edema resorption and cellular infiltration. 34 The lesion covered the sensorimotor cortex, with no or minimal involvement of underlying white matter. 46 ± 15% of M1, 22 ± 15% of M2, 63 ± 15% of S1FL, and 69 ± 21% of S1HL (mean ± SD) were affected by the lesion at 1 week after stroke.
Corticospinal Tract and Transcallosal Tract Integrity
Reconstructions of the segmented transcallosal tracts and CST, displayed in Supplemental Figures 1 and 4, showed that these tracts were not part of the ischemic lesion.
Figure 2 shows representative segmentations (in controls) of the bilateral CST and transcallosal tracts, their diffusion MRI-based characteristics, and their number of streamlines. We found a significantly lower average FA along streamlines in the ipsilesional CST of stroke rats as compared to control rats (ΔFA = −.044, 95% CI = −.058 to −.030, F group = 39.71, P < .0001). Post-hoc tests showed significant differences between FA over the ipsilesional streamlines in stroke and controls at 8 weeks (ΔFA = −.056, 95% CI = −.092 to −.021, P < .001) and 28 weeks post-stroke (ΔFA = −.042, 95% CI = −.078 to −.010, P < .05). In addition, the average RD along streamlines in the ipsilesional CST of stroke rats was significantly higher than in controls (ΔRD (10−3 mm2/s) = .045, 95% CI = .025 to .065, F group = 20.32, P < .0001). Post-hoc tests showed significant differences in RD over the ipsilesional streamlines at 8 weeks (ΔRD (10−3 mm2/s) = .052, 95% CI = .001 to .103, P < .05) and 28 weeks post-stroke (ΔRD (10−3 mm2/s) = .053, 95% CI = .002 to .104, P < .05). Although not statistically significant, AD over the ipsilesional CST streamlines tended to be lower in stroke rats at 1 week and 8 weeks as compared to controls. MD over the ipsilesional CST was not significantly different between stroke and controls rats. For the contralesional CST and the transcallosal tracts, we did not find significant differences over time, or between stroke and control rats.
Figure 2.
Diffusion MRI-based white matter characteristics in stroke and control rats. Representative segmentations of the ipsilesional CST (top row), contralesional CST (middle row), and transcallosal tracts (bottom row) of a control rat projected on an anatomical rat brain image (sagittal plane). Average fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), radial diffusivity (RD), and number of streamlines, in control (gray) and stroke (red) rats, at 1 week, 8 weeks, and 28 weeks post-stroke are shown for each reconstructed white matter pathway. Boxplots show the median and inter-quartile range (IQR), whiskers represent 1.5 times the IQR, and dots represent outliers. MD, AD, and RD values are scaled ( 10−3 mm2/s). *P < .05 (stroke vs control). CST, corticospinal tract; FA, fractional anisotropy; MD, mean diffusivity; AD, axial diffusivity; RD, radial diffusivity; IQR, inter-quartile range.
In stroke rats, the number of CST streamlines in the ipsilesional (right) hemisphere was significantly lower than the number of CST streamlines in the contralesional (left) hemisphere (ΔCSTstreamlines = −556, 95% CI = −888 to −225, F side = 11.20, P < .01), and the number of CST streamlines in the left and right CST of control rats (ΔCSTstreamlines = −670, 95% CI = −1002 to −339, F group = 16.27, P < .0001). Post-hoc testing showed a trend toward a lower number of ipsilesional streamlines after stroke as compared to controls at 8 weeks (ΔCSTstreamlines = −1280, 95% CI = −2626 to 67, P = .08). The number of streamlines in the corpus callosum (CC) was significantly lower after stroke as compared to control rats (ΔCCstreamlines = −684, 95% CI = −1163 to −206, P < .01), which tended to be most apparent at 28 weeks after stroke (ΔCCstreamlines = −1082, 95% CI = −2285 to 120, P = .10). Supplemental Table 1 shows the number of streamlines per time point, ROI and group.
Resting-State Functional Connectivity
Figure 3 shows the interhemispheric functional connectivities for the bilateral S1FL and the bilateral M1. Interhemispheric functional connectivity of S1FL was significantly lowered in stroke rats as compared to control rats (F group = 8.8, P = .005). A similar trend was found for interhemispheric connectivity of M1 (F group = 4.1, P = .050). Post-hoc tests revealed significant differences in interhemispheric functional connectivity of S1FL between stroke and control rats (ΔFCS1FL) at week 8 (ΔFCS1FL = .56, 95% CI = .01 to 1.11, P = .046), and a similar trend at week 1 (ΔFCS1FL = .46, 95% C.I. = −.06 to .98, P = .084). At 28 weeks, there was no significant difference in S1FL’s interhemispheric functional connectivity between stroke and control rats (ΔFCS1FL = .27, 95% CI = −.22 to .76, P = .269). Interhemispheric functional connectivity values for the other sensorimotor ROIs are shown in Supplemental Figure 5. Of these ROIs, only S1HL had a significantly lower interhemispheric functional connectivity after stroke as compared to control rats (F group = 9.9, P = .003). Interhemispheric functional connectivity values between contralesional sensorimotor ROIs and an ipsilesional reference region in the default mode network, that is, mPFC, did not show significant differences between stroke and control rats (Supplemental Figure 6).
Figure 3.
Interhemispheric functional connectivity over time for M1 and S1FL. Functional connectivity as mean (± SD) Fisher’s z for M1 (left) and S1FL (right) at 1 week, 8 weeks, and 28 weeks post-stroke (x-axis), for both controls (gray) and stroke rats (red). *P < .05 (stroke vs control). M1 = primary motor cortex; S1FL = forelimb regions of the primary somatosensory cortex.
Functional Deficits
Figure 4 shows the cylinder test results over time for stroke and control rats. We found a significant decline in left (stroke-affected) forelimb usage between stroke and control groups (LF (%) = −16.2, 95% CI = −12.4 to −20.1, F group = 70.3, P < .0001). Control rats used their left and right forelimbs about equally over all time points. However, stroke rats showed significantly reduced use of the stroke-affected, that is, left, forelimb from the acute stages until 8 weeks post-stroke (F group*time = 3.9, P < .001), which normalized during the chronic stages (F time = 5.4, P < .0001).
Figure 4.
Usage of the left, that is, stroke-affected, forelimb over time. Mean (± SD) forelimb usage before stroke and at 1 day, and 1, 3, 5, 8, 12, 18, and 28 weeks post-stroke (red). The time-course for controls is shown in gray. **P < .01 and *P < .05 (stroke vs control).
Pearson’s correlation coefficients revealed no significant correlations between stroke-affected forelimb usage and diffusion parameters along the ipsilesional CST and CC streamlines or interhemispheric functional connectivity of the sensorimotor ROIs.
Discussion
In the present study, we combined diffusion MRI, rs-fMRI, and behavioral testing to determine to what extent corticospinal and transcallosal tracts are affected in rats recovering from focal cortical stroke and how this may be linked to changes in functional network connectivity and sensorimotor performance. Diffusion MRI revealed a reduction in the number of streamlines, lower FA values, and higher RD values in the ipsilesional CST outside the cortical lesion area. These signs of remote white matter degeneration increased between 1 and 28 weeks post-stroke. The (time-course of) structural features of the transcallosal tracts did not significantly differ between recovering stroke animals and control animals. Resting-state fMRI showed loss of interhemispheric functional connectivity between homologous ipsi- and contralesional S1FL at 1 and 8 weeks after stroke, which was partially restored after 28 weeks. Correspondingly,, use of the stroke-affected forelimb was significantly impaired during the first 8 weeks after stroke, but gradually recovered towards week 28.
To map structural white matter tracts, we applied an advanced approach of diffusion MRI-based tractography that has been effectively utilized in stroke patient studies.19,21,35 Recently, this technique has also been successfully applied and histologically validated for reconstruction of different white matter tracts in rats, 36 thereby offering a powerful and unique means for in vivo assessment of the large white matter tracts in rodents at a whole-brain level. In the present study, we extended this method by developing a pipeline for mapping, segmenting, and analyzing the bilateral CST from the rat brain.
So far, the development of changes in the integrity of the CST has hardly been investigated in pre-clinical stroke studies despite its known significance in (loss and recovery of) sensorimotor function. The diffusion MRI-based tractography approach in the present study provided different metrics indicative of CST integrity as well as the number of reconstructed streamlines. In contrast to metrics such as FA, MD, RD, and AD, the number of streamlines is not a quantitative measure of white matter density or integrity. The number of reconstructed streamlines was found to be highly variable across rats and time points. This may be partly attributed to the lack of normalization procedures, such as between-subject intensity normalization or tractogram filtering procedures like spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms (SIFT).37,38 However, our rat brain data were not well suited for these procedures that have been developed for human brain data with higher numbers of diffusion-weighting directions and voxels with less anisotropic dimensions. In the present study, we tried to minimize within- and between-subject variation by generating a large number of streamlines (250.000) across the entire brain to ensure the reconstruction of specific tracts such as the corpus callosum and CST.
The reduced number of streamlines that we found in the ipsilesional CST after ischemic cortical damage in rats is in line with recent diffusion MRI studies in human stroke patients reporting on reduced structural connectivity (strength) in the ipsilesional CST.21,39,40 Furthermore, across all time points, we measured reduced FA in the ipsilesional CST of stroke rats as compared to controls. This has also been described in earlier stroke studies in rats and human patients18-22,41 and is believed to reflect anterograde (Wallerian) degeneration or extensive white matter edema. An increase in RD, also evident in our data, has previously been related to demyelination of white matter tracts.41-43 Because the segmentations of the CST were located entirely outside the lesioned territory, the observed structural changes are believed to be due to remote degeneration of fiber tracts that are structurally connected to the infarcted cortex. Noteworthy, in the CST of control rats, FA tended to increase over time, that is, between 12 and 39 weeks of age. This has previously been associated with ongoing white matter maturation in rats from early to late adulthood.44,45 As such, the larger difference in FA along the ipsilesional CST between control rats and stroke rats in the chronic phase may also be indicative of disturbed white matter maturation.
Despite the indication of remotely degenerating corticospinal fibers after cortical ischemic injury, our study did not reveal similar signs of degeneration of transcallosal tracts, which are known to also arise from the sensorimotor cortex. Although speculative, we think that recruitment of intact contralesional homotopical cortical regions, which may play a compensatory role in sensorimotor recovery15,22 and sustained interhemispheric neuronal communication through the transcallosal tracts, may counteract or limit secondary white matter degeneration in these tracts. In contrast, decreased usage of the contralateral forelimb, and consequent reduced axonal in- and output may enhance the neurodegenerative processes of the ipsilesional CST (i.e., “use it or lose it”).46,47 Preservation of transcallosal tracts may also have contributed to the preservation of functional connectivity between most of the intact ipsi- and contralesional regions within the sensorimotor network after stroke, as well as to the restoration of interhemispheric functional connectivity of S1FL at 28 weeks. This is in agreement with an earlier study, in which we showed restoration of interhemispheric functional connectivity at 10 weeks after unilateral transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rats, following initial loss of function during the first 3 weeks, together with intact trans-hemispheric neuroanatomical connectivity. 15 Moreover, improved sensorimotor performance was related to normalization of interhemispheric functional connectivity, 15 a finding that has also been reported in human stroke studies.23,48
Our current study shows that despite remote CST degeneration, recovery of sensorimotor function is possible, which may rely on the integrity of transcallosal tracts, although our data do not provide evidence of causality between microstructural integrity and functional connectivity. Other mechanisms, like cortical remapping49-52 or increased involvement of other white matter tracts, such as the rubro-spinal tract39,53,54 and reticulospinal tract,55,56 may also contribute to alleviation of functional impairments. Future research could employ recently developed quantitative diffusion MRI-based approaches, which enable calculation of fiber density and fiber cross-section,57-60 for improved assessment of white matter characteristics in relation to (potential for) stroke recovery. This may lead to the development of novel diagnostic imaging markers that could better predict functional outcome in patients recovering from stroke and guide individualized treatment strategies.
Supplemental Material
Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-1-nnr-10.1177_15459683211041318 for Remote Corticospinal Tract Degeneration After Cortical Stroke in Rats May Not Preclude Spontaneous Sensorimotor Recovery by Michel R. T. Sinke, Geralda A. F. van Tilborg, Anu E. Meerwaldt, Caroline L. van Heijningen, Annette van der Toorn, Milou Straathof, Fazle Rakib, Mohamed H. M. Ali, Khalid Al-Saad, Willem M. Otte and Rick M. Dijkhuizen in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Authors Contribution: R.M.D., G.A.F.v.T., and M.R.T.S. designed the study. G.A.F.v.T., A.E.M., and A.v.d.T. acquired the data. M.R.T.S., G.A.F.v.T., M.S., and C.L.v.H. performed data analyses. C.L.v.H. performed stroke surgery. M.R.T.S., G.A.F.v.T., W.M.O., M.S., F.R., M.H.M.A., K.A.-S., and R.M.D. contributed to the data interpretation and drafting of the article.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was funded by NPRP grant no. NPRP-5-381-3-101 from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of The Qatar Foundation) and a VICI grant (016.130.662) from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research.
Supplemental material: Supplementary material for this article is available on the Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair website along with the online version of this article.
ORCID iDs
Michel R. T. Sinke https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8185-9209
Anu E. Meerwaldt https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5662-6828
References
- 1.Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):245-255. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61953-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sousa RM, Ferri CP, Acosta D, et al. Contribution of chronic diseases to disability in elderly people in countries with low and middle incomes: a 10/66 Dementia research group population-based survey. Lancet. 2009;374(9704):1821-1830. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61829-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Krakauer J, Marshall R. The proportional recovery rule for stroke revisited. Ann Neurol. 2015;78(6):845-847. doi: 10.1109/ISCAS.2011.5937535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jeffers MS, Karthikeyan S, Corbett D. Does stroke rehabilitation really matter? Part A: proportional stroke recovery in the rat. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32(1):3-6. doi: 10.1177/1545968317751210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hope TMH, Friston K, Price CJ, Leff AP, Rotshtein P, Bowman H. Recovery after stroke: not so proportional after all? Brain. 2019;142(1):15-22. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kundert R, Goldsmith J, Veerbeek JM, Krakauer JW, Luft AR. What the proportional recovery rule is (and is not): methodological and statistical considerations. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2019;33(11):876-887. doi: 10.1177/1545968319872996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grefkes C, Fink GR. Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain. 2011;134(5):1264-1276. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cramer SC. Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. mechanisms of spontaneous recovery. Ann Neurol. 2008;63(3):272-287. doi: 10.1002/ana.21393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jiang L, Xu H, Yu C, Jiang L, Xu H, Yu C. Brain connectivity plasticity in the motor network after ischemic stroke. Neural Plast. 2013;2013:1-11. doi: 10.1155/2013/924192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jones TA. Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(5):267-280. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(12):861-872. doi: 10.1038/nrn2735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rehme AK, Grefkes C. Cerebral network disorders after stroke: evidence from imaging-based connectivity analyses of active and resting brain states in humans. J Physiol. 2013;591(1):17-31. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.243469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Carter AR, Shulman GL, Corbetta M. Why use a connectivity-based approach to study stroke and recovery of function? Neuroimage. 2012;62(4):2271-2280. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Crofts JJ, Higham DJ, Bosnell R, et al. Network analysis detects changes in the contralesional hemisphere following stroke. Neuroimage. 2011;54(1):161-169. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.van Meer MPA, van der Marel K, Wang K, et al. Recovery of sensorimotor function after experimental stroke correlates with restoration of resting-state interhemispheric functional connectivity. J Neurosci. 2010;30(11):3964-3972. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5709-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jbabdi S, Johansen-Berg H. Tractography: where do we go from here? Brain Connect. 2011;1(3):169-183. doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.0033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Basser PJ, Pajevic S, Pierpaoli C, Duda J, Aldroubi A. In vivo fiber tractography using DT-MRI data. Magn Reson Med. 2000;44:625-632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lindberg PG, Skejø PHB, Rounis E, et al. Wallerian degeneration of the corticofugal tracts in chronic stroke: a pilot study relating diffusion tensor imaging, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and hand function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(6):551-560. doi: 10.1177/1545968307301886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lindenberg R, Zhu LL, Rüber T, Schlaug G. Predicting functional motor potential in chronic stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33(5):1040-1051. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schaechter JD, Fricker ZP, Perdue KL, et al. Microstructural status of ipsilesional and contralesional corticospinal tract correlates with motor skill in chronic stroke patients. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(11):3461-3474. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lindenberg R, Renga V, Zhu LL, Betzler F, Alsop D, Schlaug G. Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke. Neurology. 2010;74(4):280-287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.van Meer MPA, Otte WM, van der Marel K, et al. Extent of bilateral neuronal network reorganization and functional recovery in relation to stroke severity. J Neurosci. 2012;32(13):4495-4507. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3662-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Carter AR, Astafiev SV, Lang CE, et al. Resting inter-hemispheric fMRI connectivity predicts performance after stroke. Ann Neurol. 2010;67(3):365-375. doi: 10.1002/ana.21905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grefkes C, Fink GR. Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(2):206-216. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70264-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.van Meer MP, van der Marel K, Otte WM, Berkelbach van der Sprenkel JW, Dijkhuizen RM. Correspondence between altered functional and structural connectivity in the contralesional sensorimotor cortex after unilateral stroke in rats: a combined resting-state functional MRI and manganese-enhanced MRI study. J Cerebr Blood Flow Metabol. 2010;30(10):1707-1711. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL. Neuroimage. 2012;62(2):782-790. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17(3):143-155. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jenkinson M, Bannister P, Brady M, Smith S. Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage. 2002;17(2):825-841. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(02)91132-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jenkinson M, Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal. 2001;5(2):143-156. doi: 10.1016/S1361-8415(01)00036-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Andersson JLR, Jenkinson M, Smith S. Non-Linear Registration. Aka Spatial Normalisation. FMRIB Technical Report TR07JA2.; 2007. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tournier JD, Calamante F, Connelly A. MRtrix: diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions. Int J Imag Syst Technol. 2012;22(1):53-66. doi: 10.1002/ima.22005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Paxinos G, Watson W. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 5th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Majka P, Kublik E, Furga G, Wójcik DK. Common atlas format and 3D brain atlas reconstructor: Infrastructure for Constructing 3D brain atlases. Neuroinformatics. 2012;10(2):181-197. doi: 10.1007/s12021-011-9138-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Liu NW, Ke CC, Zhao Y, et al. Evolutional characterization of photochemically induced stroke in rats: a multimodality imaging and molecular biological study. Transl Stroke Res. 2017;8(3):244-256. doi: 10.1007/s12975-016-0512-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Koh CL, Tang PF, Chen HI, Hsu YC, Hsieh CL, Tseng WYI. Impaired callosal motor fiber integrity and upper extremity motor impairment are associated with stroke lesion location. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32(6-7):602-612. doi: 10.1177/1545968318779730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Figini M, Zucca I, Aquino D, et al. In vivo DTI tractography of the rat brain: an atlas of the main tracts in Paxinos space with histological comparison. Magn Reson Imag. 2015;33(3):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Smith RE, Tournier JD, Calamante F, Connelly A. The effects of SIFT on the reproducibility and biological accuracy of the structural connectome. Neuroimage. 2015;104:253-265. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Smith RE, Tournier JD, Calamante F, Connelly A. SIFT: spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms. Neuroimage. 2013;67:298-312. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rüber T, Schlaug G, Lindenberg R. Compensatory role of the cortico-rubro-spinal tract in motor recovery after stroke. Neurology. 2012;79:515-522. doi:P06.243-P0610.1212/wnl.78.1_meetingabstracts.p06.243.Meeting Abstracts 1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cheng B, Schlemm E, Schulz R, et al. Altered topology of large-scale structural brain networks in chronic stroke. Brain Commun. 2019;1(1):fcz020. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcz020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tuor UI, Morgunov M, Sule M, et al. Cellular correlates of longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging of axonal degeneration following hypoxic-ischemic cerebral infarction in neonatal rats. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;6:32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Song SK, Yoshino J, Le TQ, et al. Demyelination increases radial diffusivity in corpus callosum of mouse brain. Neuroimage. 2005;26(1):132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sun SW, Liang HF, Trinkaus K, Cross AH, Armstrong RC, Song SK. Noninvasive detection of cuprizone induced axonal damage and demyelination in the mouse corpus callosum. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55(2):302-308. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mengler L, Khmelinskii A, Diedenhofen M, et al. Brain maturation of the adolescent rat cortex and striatum: changes in volume and myelination. Neuroimage. 2014;84:35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Blockx I, Van Camp N, Verhoye M, et al. Genotype specific age related changes in a transgenic rat model of Huntington’s disease. Neuroimage. 2011;58(4):1006-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zeiler SR, Krakauer JW. The interaction between training and plasticity in the poststroke brain. Curr Opin Neurol. 2013;26(6):609-616. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Allred RP, Kim SY, Jones TA. Use it and/or lose it-experience effects on brain remodeling across time after stroke. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8(JUNE):1-8. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Carter AR, Patel KR, Astafiev SV, et al. Upstream dysfunction of somatomotor functional connectivity after corticospinal damage in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(1):7-19. doi: 10.1177/1545968311411054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RSJ. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain. 2003;126(11):2476-2496. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jaillard A, Martin CD, Garambois K, Lebas JF, Hommel M. Vicarious function within the human primary motor cortex? A longitudinal fMRI stroke study. Brain. 2005;128(5):1122-1138. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dijkhuizen RM, Ren J, Mandeville JB, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reorganization in rat brain after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(22):12766-12771. doi: 10.1073/pnas.231235598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Okabe N, Shiromoto T, Himi N, et al. Neural network remodeling underlying motor map reorganization induced by rehabilitative training after ischemic stroke. Neuroscience. 2016;339:338-362. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Esposito MS, Capelli P, Arber S. Brainstem nucleus MdV mediates skilled forelimb motor tasks. Nature. 2014;508(7496):351-356. doi: 10.1038/nature13023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Takenobu Y, Hayashi T, Moriwaki H, Nagatsuka K, Naritomi H, Fukuyama H. Motor recovery and microstructural change in rubro-spinal tract in subcortical stroke. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;4:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bachmann LC, Lindau NT, Felder P, Schwab ME. Sprouting of brainstem-spinal tracts in response to unilateral motor cortex stroke in mice. J Neurosci. 2014;34(9):3378-3389. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.4384-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zaaimi B, Edgley SA, Soteropoulos DS, Baker SN. Changes in descending motor pathway connectivity after corticospinal tract lesion in macaque monkey. Brain. 2012;135(7):2277-2289. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Tournier JD, Mori S, Leemans A. Diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65(6):1532-1556. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jeurissen B, Tournier JD, Dhollander T, Connelly A, Sijbers J. Multi-tissue constrained spherical deconvolution for improved analysis of multi-shell diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage. 2014;103:411-426. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Raffelt D, Tournier JD, Rose S, et al. Apparent fibre density: a novel measure for the analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage. 2012;59(4):3976-3994. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Raffelt DA, Smith RE, Ridgway GR, et al. Connectivity-based fixel enhancement: whole-brain statistical analysis of diffusion MRI measures in the presence of crossing fibres. Neuroimage. 2015;117:40-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplemental Material, sj-pdf-1-nnr-10.1177_15459683211041318 for Remote Corticospinal Tract Degeneration After Cortical Stroke in Rats May Not Preclude Spontaneous Sensorimotor Recovery by Michel R. T. Sinke, Geralda A. F. van Tilborg, Anu E. Meerwaldt, Caroline L. van Heijningen, Annette van der Toorn, Milou Straathof, Fazle Rakib, Mohamed H. M. Ali, Khalid Al-Saad, Willem M. Otte and Rick M. Dijkhuizen in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair




