Abstract
Objectives:
Voice disorders in Parkinson’s disease (PD) are early-onset, manifest in the preclinical stages of the disease, and negatively impact quality of life. The complete loss of function in the PTEN-induced kinase 1 gene (Pink1) causes a genetic form of early-onset, autosomal recessive PD. Modeled after the human inherited mutation, the Pink1−/− rat demonstrates significant cranial sensorimotor dysfunction including declines in ultrasonic vocalizations. However, the underlying genetics of the vocal fold thyroarytenoid (TA) muscle that may contribute to vocal deficits has not been studied. The aim of this study was to identify differentially expressed genes in the TA muscle of 8-month-old male Pink1−/− rats compared to wildtype controls.
Methods:
High throughput RNA sequencing was used to examine TA muscle gene expression in adult male Pink1−/− rats and wildtype controls. Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis was used to construct co-expression modules to identify biological networks, including where Pink1 was a central node. The ENRICHR tool was used to compare this gene set to existing human gene databases.
Results:
We identified 134 annotated differentially expressed genes (p<0.05 cutoff) and observed enrichment in the following biological pathways: Parkinson’s disease (Casp7, Pink1); Parkin-Ubiquitin proteasome degradation (Psmd12, Psmd7); MAPK signaling (Casp7, Ppm1b, Ppp3r1); and inflammatory TNF-α, Nf-κB Signaling (Casp7, Psmd12, Psmd7, Cdc34, Bcl7a, Peg3).
Conclusions:
Genes and pathways identified here may be useful for evaluating the specific mechanisms of peripheral dysfunction including within the laryngeal muscle and have potential to be used as experimental biomarkers for treatment development.
Keywords: thyroarytenoid muscle, Parkinson’s disease, rat, larynx, gene expression
1. Introduction
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a multisystem, degenerative disorder that affects millions of people worldwide.1,2 Cranial sensorimotor deficits, including vocal communication changes and impairments, impact 90% of individuals diagnosed with PD.3–6 Dysarthria, dysphonia, and dysprosody manifest early in disease progression (preclinically), prior to the hallmark nigrostriatal brain degeneration of PD, are refractory to standard pharmaceutical therapies, and significantly diminish social interactions and patient quality of life.7–12 Despite this significant negative health impact, management of vocal dysfunction in PD is limited by our understanding of underlying early-onset disease pathology within the subsystems of voice including the resonating and respiration systems as well as within the laryngeal system including the vocal fold.
The classic pathology of PD is the progressive death of dopaminergic neurons within the substantia nigra along with the accumulation of alpha-synuclein-containing protein aggregations (Lewy bodies). These markers positively correlate to limb motor impairments and progressive cognitive decline at the time of and after a formal diagnosis. However, recent research has shown that PD is a complex disease that likely manifests in multiple systems including the enteric, autonomic, and other peripheral systems up to a decade prior to clinical diagnosis (reviewed in Shapira et al., 2017).13 Of interest, changes to vocalization parameters manifest early and decline in most PD patients. Vocalization impairments do not respond to standard dopamine replacement therapies,14–16 suggesting that the mechanism of dysfunction within the vocal fold muscle differs from that of the limb. Data from human post-mortem (late-stage PD) studies have found the presence and accumulation of abnormal neuromuscular pathology (alpha-synuclein, Lewy Bodies) within the peripheral structures of the pharynx and larynx.17–19 However, the prodromal/preclinical period associated with the onset of vocal dysfunction is a time period that is difficult to study in human subjects. Therefore, a genetic model of early-onset PD, the Pink1−/− (phosphatase and tensin homolog [PTEN]-induced putative kinase 1) rat, is useful to study early-stage tissue pathology.
Rats produce social ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) that occur in the 50-kilohertz (kHz) range and are analogous to human vocal communication.20–23 Rat USVs are generated on an egressive airflow, forced air flow through the vocal fold,24,25 and modulated, in part, by the intrinsic thyroarytenoid (TA) muscles.23,26–28,29 Rat laryngeal anatomy consists of a dense cartilage framework containing an intralaryngeal ventral pouch important to resonatory features of the USV.30 USVs are hypothesized to be produced via an air jet passing glottal and supraglottal spaces. Vocal folds are essential to this whistle-like production because several studies have demonstrated that vocal folds must be adducted for USV production to occur. This complex vocalization behavior requires the contraction of intrinsic muscles, including that of the of the TA which shortens and adducts the vocal fold, all together resulting in the physical mechanism of the egressive airflow and whistle through the larynx and vocal output.31–34 Previous work in normal rats has shown that TA muscle activity (measured by electromyographic recordings) influence USV call duration and frequency.25,32,35 Thus, dysfunction within the TA muscle may provide insight into the pathogenesis of early-onset vocal deficits in PD. Earlier research has shown that male Pink1−/− rats exhibit early and progressive USV deficits compared to healthy wildtype (WT) control rats.36–38 These changes in vocalization, including decreases in intensity (decibels (dB)) and pitch (bandwidth (kHz), peak frequency (kHz)), appear independent of severe nigrostriatal dopamine loss as they do not respond to L-dopa, but may be related to significant neuropathological findings including α-synuclein in the brainstem motor regions that control vocal output.39 Other work has shown that respiratory behavioral measures in Pink1−/− rats are similar to WT controls suggesting that dysfunction may be pinpointed at the level of the laryngeal source of the vocalization (e.g. the primary muscle of the vocal fold), thus providing further evidence to investigate the TA muscle.40 For example, preliminary investigation of the muscular properties of the TA muscle in the Pink1−/− rat show increases in centralized nuclei and changes to muscle fiber profiles with decreases in muscle fiber size and increased 2L myofiber densities.41 These muscular changes are negatively correlated to vocalization intensity (unpublished data), suggesting a deficit in the peripheral muscle relates to vocal performance.
Large scale gene expression studies in post-mortem PD, Alzheimer’s, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) tissue, and normal healthy controls has led to the generation of databases of the gene expression underlying these diseases. Often though, whole genome association studies of PD are performed with late-stage or postmortem tissues. To date, there has been no examination of the gene expression changes in laryngeal muscles in the Pink1−/− rat model of early-onset PD. The goal of the present study was to identify differentially expressed genes using RNA-sequencing and bioinformatic analysis of the TA muscle of male Pink1−/− rats compared to WT controls. We hypothesized that loss of Pink1 from the TA muscle will enable us to: (1) detect changes in expression of genes that interact with Pink1, (2) catalog molecular pathways that may modulate voice and provide avenues for vocal-specific treatments, and (3) compare gene overlap between multiple degenerative disorders.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Rats and housing
Eight (n=4 Pink1−/−, n=4 WT) male Long Evans rats (Envigo™ Research Labs, Boyertown, PA, USA) were aged to 8 months of age.42,43 All rats were housed in groups of two (within like genotypes) in standard polycarbonate cages (290 mm × 533 mm × 210 mm) on a reversed 12:12 hour light: dark cycle. Food and water were available ad libitum. All experimental procedures were approved by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory animals.44
2.2. Muscle tissue harvest and processing
Rats were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and rapidly decapitated. The whole larynx was grossly dissected from the rat. Isolation of the TA muscle was performed as quickly as possible to avoid degradation of biological targets. The chilled larynx was prepared on the dissection surface under a dissection microscope. Using a micro-forceps and micro-scissors, the thyroid cartilage, arytenoid cartilages, and epiglottis were visualized, and TA muscles were isolated by removing them from all cartilaginous attachments. To remove the TA muscle from cartilaginous attachments, the larynx was bisected longitudinally, cutting through the thyroid cartilage vertically to bisect the region between the right and left TA at their insertion into the thyroid cartilage. The posterior larynx was then bisected between the right and left arytenoid cartilage within the back of the larynx. On each side, the TA was dissected away from the thyroid cartilage and arytenoid cartilage.45 Individual dissected samples from the left and right TA muscles were placed in Eppendorf microcentrifuge tubes and promptly frozen at −80 until processing. Samples were processed by an experimenter blinded to genotype. Tissue was homogenized with an electric sonic dismembrator (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH, USA) and RNA was extracted with the Bio-Rad Aurum Total RNA Fatty and Fibrous Tissue Kit (Catalog No. 732-6830; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was measured using a Nanodrop system (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) and the 28S:18S rRNA was quantified with an Agilent RNA 6000 Pico kit (Eukaryote Total RNA Pico, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and verified with the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
2.3. Library construction and RNA sequencing
All RNA-sequencing procedures followed guidelines by ENCODE and were performed by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Biotechnology Center’s Next Generation Sequencing Facility with the Illumina® Total RNA-Seq TruSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The Illumina Stranded Total RNA Library Prep Kit was used to remove rRNA and generate sequencing libraries as described by the manufacturer and in Kelm-Nelson and Gammie, 2020.46 Sequencing was performed on an HiSeq 2000 high-throughput sequencing system within a single run (Illumina, Inc). After removal of adaptor sequences, contamination and low-quality reads, reads were mapped to the annotated rat (Rattus Norvegicus) genome in Ensembl.47 Technical quality was determined using several parameters, detailed in Kelm-Nelson and Gammie, 2020. A number of differentially expressed genes were identified (raw data (RSEM), is displayed in Supplementary Table 1).
2.4. Differential gene expression analysis
Gene analysis was performed using the EdgeR Bioconductor Package, v. 3.9.48 The p-value cutoff was set to 0.05 for significance and a Benjamini-Hochberg correction was applied to control the False Discovery Rate (FDR).49 EdgeR results are provided in Supplementary Table 2. The RSEM approach for normalizing RNA seq data was used.50 Raw data were uploaded to the Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE151209; GSE151209), and genes were ranked according to p value and sorted by up- or down-regulation.
2.5. Weighted gene co-expression network (WGCNA) analysis
A WGCNA was used to construct co-expression networks and modules from the gene expression dataset. Data were log2(x+1) transformed, low expression genes were removed and WGCNA was run (16593 number of genes) using R software (https://www.r-project.org/).51 Correlations were raised to a soft thresholding power β of 12. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering for WGCNA included: the minimum module size of 30 genes, the signed mode, the deepSplit parameter set to 2, the mergeCutHeight parameter set to 0.15, and a threshold setting for merging modules of 0.25. Modules were visualized using Cytoscape (v3.7.1; https://cytoscape.org/).
2.6. Gene enrichment analysis
In order to identify genes that are over-represented in the data and associated with particular functions and relevance to PD, gene enrichment analysis was performed on both the differentially expressed gene dataset and the gene modules produced by the WGCNA analysis. Genes were classified by their gene ontology (GO) and gene enrichment was performed with EnrichR.52
3. Results
Gene expression from the TA muscle of Pink1−/− male rats was compared to WT male rats at 8 months of age. As confirmation of the model, Pink1 was the most significantly downregulated gene. The list of the 134 up- and down-regulated protein coding (annotated) genes and their corresponding GO (verified with NCBI gene ontology based on their function, biological process, and component) are in Supplementary Table 3. Top gene ontology categories were immune, epidermal, metabolism, cell signaling adhesion and transport, as well as muscle and epithelial.
A WGCNA was used to construct the gene co-expression biological networks, with defined modules (clusters and network nodes) from the gene expression dataset searchable networks were created (Supplementary Table 4). There were 51 modules created from the WGCNA analysis. Of these modules, the Lightgreen module (arbitrary name designed by R software) was chosen for further analysis in this study because it contained the Pink1 gene as the central node with 104 interacting genes. The data are visualized using Cytoscape (Figure 1). ENRICHR was used to evaluate gene ontology and biological processes from the Lightgreen module list; several areas of enrichment were identified (Table 1) including TNF-alpha NF-kB signaling pathway, Parkinson disease, and proteasome degradation.
Figure 1. Lightgreen WGCNA module.

The interaction network of the differentially expressed genes was visualized using Cytoscape 3.3.0 software. Data were plotted using weight (level of significance) as a factor. Only annotated genes are plotted from the dataset. Pink1 (yellow) was the top gene with the highest number of significant connections. Lines represent significant correlations between two genes.
Table 1.
Gene enrichment analysis of the “lightgreen” module containing the Pink1 gene.
| ENRICHR WikiPathways | p-value | Genes |
|---|---|---|
| TNF-alpha NF-kB Signaling Pathway: WP246 | 8.43E-05 | CASP7; PSMD12; PSMD7; CDC34; BCL7A; PEG3 |
| Parkinson Disease Pathway: WP3638 | 0.009887 | CASP7; PINK1 |
| Proteasome Degradation: WP519 | 0.017132 | PSMD12; PSMD7 |
| Synthesis and Degradation of Ketone Bodies: WP543 | 0.019104 | BDH1 |
| MAPK Signaling Pathway: WP493 | 0.023501 | CASP7; PPM1B; PPP3R1 |
| Alzheimer’s Disease: WP2075 | 0.033882 | CASP7; PPP3R1 |
Gene Abbreviations: CASP7= Caspase 7; PSMD12= Proteasome 26S Subunit, Non-ATPase 12; PSMD7= Proteasome 26S Subunit, Non-ATPase 7; CDC34= Cell Division Cycle 34, Ubiquitin Conjugating Enzyme; BCL7A= BAF Chromatin Remodeling Complex Subunit BCL7A; PEG3= Paternally Expressed 3; Pink1= PTEN-induced kinase 1; BDH1= 3-Hydroxybutyrate Dehydrogenase 1; PPM1B= Protein Phosphatase, Mg2+/Mn2+ Dependent 1B; PPP3R1= Protein Phosphatase 3 Regulatory Subunit B, Alpha.
4. Discussion
The TA muscle, the primary muscle of the vocal fold, is integral to the anatomic positioning of the vocal fold within the larynx structure to produce the substrate for the air jet as part of the vocalization mechanism and subsequent whistle via egressive airflow.25 The Pink1−/− rat, an early-onset model of inherited PD, demonstrates early and progressive disruption of social communication USVs as well as biological changes to the TA muscle.41,53 The present study used RNA sequencing to evaluate gene expression changes and relevant biological pathways in the TA in both male Pink1−/− rats and healthy WT controls. These findings are critical to establishing links between genetic animal models for research and human disease databases.
The manageably sized list of differentially expressed (annotated) genes that was generated (134) were categorized by biological function, process, and component according to NCBI Gene Ontology (GO). Of this list, only 19 genes were down-regulated in expression, while the remaining 115 genes were up-regulated. One down-regulated gene of interest is neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (Ntrk2) which is involved in both central and peripheral nervous system regulation of neuron survival, proliferation, differentiation, and plasticity through MAPK and NF-κB signaling cascades (discussed below). In addition, only 4% of genes of the significantly expressed genes were muscle-related and included myosin heavy chain 7 (Myh7), myosin light chain 3 (Myl3), troponinI1 (slow skeletal type, TNNI1), and myozenin 2 (Myoz2). Several of these genes are included in the regulation of muscle contraction, development, and response to stress.
The majority of this dataset’s differentially expressed genes were categorized as immune-related (14%). Interestingly, 3% of genes were also related to cell death by apoptosis. These data expand on the ever-growing body of literature that shows that loss of function of Pink1 disrupts immune response pathways and leads to inflammation-induced neuronal cell death.54 For instance, adenosine deaminase (Ada), up-regulated in Pink1−/− rats, is involved in a variety of immune processes including T-cell activation and B-cell differentiation as well as response to cellular stressors such as hydrogen peroxide and hypoxia. In contrast, there were also several down-regulated genes that involve immune processes including C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 (Cxcl9), immunoglobulin heavy constant gamma 1 (Ighg1), Immunoglobulin J chain (Jchain), myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1 (Mx1), and MX dynamin like GTPase 2 (Mx2). Mx1 has also been found to regulate synapse structure or activity and postsynaptic neurotransmitter receptor internalization. This is consistent with previous cell culture work that suggests that Pink1 deficiency increases pro-inflammatory gene expression as well as the presence of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as nitric oxide (NO) in mouse glial cells.54 While inflammation has not yet been fully researched, our data is the first to suggest that inflammatory pathways may be integral in the Pink1 model in vivo; this has been previously demonstrated in muscle cells within other models of PD.55 In humans, symptoms of chronic laryngitis and inflammation of the laryngeal tissues include edema, hoarseness, and loss of voice. Vocal fold edema is known to impact vibration adversely, affecting the pitch. PD inflammation processes within the vocal folds may lead to supraglottal hyperadduction, which can change the structure and function of the speech musculature.56 Future research should investigate the direct role of inflammatory pathways within the TA muscle and subsequent alterations in rodent vocalizations.
Eight genes in the kallikrein family, which have diverse physiological functions and are found in nearly all tissues and fluids, were significantly up-regulated in the TA of Pink1−/− rats. Recent literature suggests kallikreins may serve as possible biomarkers for many diseases. For example, Klk8 is an up-regulated gene of interest as it been implicated as a potential biomarker and future therapeutic target for AD.57 Furthermore, Klk6 is highly expressed in the nervous system and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple disorders including Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and PD. For example, recent studies have shown that Klk6 is directly involved in the degradation and turnover of alpha-synuclein.58 Past work has shown that in Pink1−/− rats, alpha-synuclein is present in brainstem regions important for vocal function as well as in the nucleus ambiguus, where motor neuron cell bodies for speech and swallowing reside.59 While alpha-synuclein accumulation has been found in the larynx of post-mortem (late-stage) human PD samples, this work has not been yet replicated in the Pink1−/− rat.17,19 Increases in alpha-synuclein within the neuromuscular junction, nerves and vessels of 6 month old Pink1−/− rats have been reported in the extrinsic tongue muscle (genioglossus) and has been hypothesized to be a small, disease occurring change in the innervation of the tongue muscles.60 A key interpretation of the current study is that changes in gene pathways (e.g. kallikrein and/or inflammatory pathways) maybe significant in this early disease model, lead to muscle pathology, and therefore, warrants further investigation.
Another goal of the present study was to use bioinformatics to highlight gene pathways within the TA. WGNCA enrichment analysis of the Lightgreen module (containing the Pink1 gene as the central node) showed 6 significant biological pathways (TNF-α NF-κB Signaling, Parkinson Disease, Proteasome Degradation, Synthesis and Degradation of Ketone Bodies, MAPK Signaling, Alzheimer’s Disease). The top significant pathway, TNF-α NF-κB Signaling, and MAPK Signaling are involved in many important biological processes including cell proliferation and apoptosis and the regulation of immune and pro-inflammatory responses. Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) regulates the expression of over 200 genes involved in complex inflammatory pathways;61,62 and has been implicated in the pathophysiology of PD including alpha-synuclein accumulation.63–65 Increased levels of downstream NF-κB signaling targets, such as pro-inflammatory factors (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α), have also been found in the nigrostriatal region of postmortem PD brain tissue and CSF.64,66–68 In addition to NF-κB signaling, evidence has shown that MAPK signaling is triggered in response to oxidative stress and may indirectly induce apoptosis of dopamine neurons via mitochondrial dysfunction.69,70 Previous work within the Pink1−/− rat has shown that mitophagy is a common phenotype and disrupts cellular homeostasis.71 One of the up-regulated genes involved in 4 of the 6 significant pathways is Caspase 7 (Casp7), which is involved in the modulation of the cell cycle and plays a central role in apoptosis. These new data suggest that inflammation is widespread (i.e. not only central nervous system) thus, future research should directly target Casp7 and the NF-κB and MAPK pathways as a mechanism of inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction in the Pink1−/− rat as well as their contribution to muscle cell changes within the vocal fold.
5. Conclusions
Compared to other recently generated gene datasets (i.e. Kelm-Nelson and Gammie 2020, brain tissue), there were significantly fewer differentially expressed genes between Pink1−/− and WT rats in this study. However, WGNCA enrichment databases found significant correlations between this gene dataset and human and cell lines for idiopathic as well as PARK2 and 6 genetic forms of PD. Therefore, this data validates the translatability between human and the Pink1−/− rat model. The additional overlap between PD, Alzheimer’s disease, and multiple sclerosis also suggests that the Pink1−/− animal model may be a relevant model to study common degenerative disease mechanisms. Future studies exploring this gene expression profile in addition to using drug repurposing tools will help identify and validate treatments for the modulation of PD vocal communication and swallowing deficits. In summary, this work is the first to quantify gene expression changes in the TA muscle in the Pink1−/− rat model of early-onset PD.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Table 3. Significant gene list. Results of a differential gene expression (protein coding genes) in the TA of male rats. Significant annotated gene list with categories.
Supplementary Table 1. RSEM output. RNA-Seq data used to analyze differential gene expression using EdgeR. Genotype and rat IDs are listed to the right.
Supplementary Table 2. EdgeR output. Results of a differential gene expression. Analysis of RNA-Seq data using EdgeR. A negative logFC indicates that gene expression is down regulated in the Pink1−/− rats.
Supplementary Table 4. WGCNA data. Gene modules identified by WGCNA.
Acknowledgments:
The authors thank the University of Wisconsin- Madison Biotechnology Center Gene Expression Center & DNA Sequencing Facility for providing library preparation and next-generation sequencing services. We would like to acknowledge the UW Bioinformatics Resource Center for their assistance with data analysis.
Funding:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R21 DC016135 and R01NS117469 (Kelm-Nelson). This project was supported in part by grant 1UL1TR002373 to UW ICTR from NIH/NCATS (Kelm-Nelson and Gammie).
Footnotes
Ethics approval and consent to participate: All procedures were approved by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory animals.
Availability of data and material: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the NCBI GEO Data repository [GSE151209]. Website: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE151209
Financial Disclosure/Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
6. References
- 1.de Lau L, Giesbergen P, de Rijk M. Incidence of parkinsonism and Parkinson disease in a general population: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology 2004; 63:1240–1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Van Den Eeden SK, Tanner CM, Bernstein AL et al. Incidence of Parkinson’s disease: variation by age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:1015–1022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Logemann JA, Fisher HB, Boshes B, Blonsky ER. Frequency and cooccurrence of vocal tract dysfunctions in the speech of a large sample of Parkinson patients. J Speech Hear Disord 1978; 43:47–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sapir S, Ramig L, Fox C. Speech and swallowing disorders in Parkinson disease. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 16:205–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Huber JE, Darling M. Effect of Parkinson’s disease on the production of structured and unstructured speaking tasks: respiratory physiologic and linguistic considerations. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2011; 54:33–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fox CM, Ramig LO. Vocal sound pressure level and self-perception of speech and voice in men and women with idiopathic Parkinson disease. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1997; 6:85–94. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Anand S, Stepp CE. Listener perception of monopitch, naturalness, and intelligibility for speakers with Parkinson’s Disease. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2015; 58:1134–1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kadastik-Eerme L, Rosenthal M, Paju T, Muldmaa M, Taba P. Health-related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: a cross-sectional study focusing on non-motor symptoms. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2015; 13:83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barone P, Antonini A, Colosimo C et al. The PRIAMO study: A multicenter assessment of nonmotor symptoms and their impact on quality of life in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2009; 24:1641–1649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Martinez-Martin P, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Kurtis MM, Chaudhuri KR. The impact of non-motor symptoms on health-related quality of life of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2011; 26:399–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lirani-Silva C, Mourao LF, Gobbi LT. Dysarthria and quality of life in neurologically healthy elderly and patients with Parkinson’s disease. CoDAS 2015; 27:248–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Miller N, Noble E, Jones D, Burn D. Life with communication changes in Parkinson’s disease. Age Ageing 2006; 35:235–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schapira AHV, Chaudhuri KR, Jenner P. Non-motor features of Parkinson disease. Nature Review Neuroscience 2017; 18:435–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gallena S, Smith PJ, Zeffiro T, Ludlow CL. Effects of levodopa on laryngeal muscle activity for voice onset and offset in Parkinson disease. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44:1284–1299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Plowman-Prine EK, Okun MS, Sapienza CM et al. Perceptual characteristics of Parkinsonian speech: A comparison of the pharmacological effects of levodopa across speech and non-speech motor systems. NeuroRehabilitation 2009; 24:131–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sanabria J, Ruiz PG, Gutierrez R et al. The effect of levodopa on vocal function in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 2001; 24:99–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mu L, Chen J, Sobotka S et al. Alpha-Synuclein Pathology in Sensory Nerve Terminals of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract of Parkinson’s Disease Patients. Dysphagia 2015; 30:404–417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mu L, Sobotka S, Chen J et al. Altered pharyngeal muscles in Parkinson disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2012; 71:520–230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mu L, Sobotka S, Chen J et al. Parkinson disease affects peripheral sensory nerves in the pharynx. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2013; 72:614–623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Knutson B, Burgdorf J, Panksepp J. Ultrasonic vocalizations as indices of affective states in rats. Psychol Bull 2002; 128:961–977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Brudzynski SM. Communication of adult rats by ultrasonic vocalization: Biological, sociobiological, and neuroscience approaches. ILAR J 2009; 50:43–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brudzynski SM. Ethotransmission: communication of emotional states through ultrasonic vocalization in rats. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2013; 23:310–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brudzynski SM, Pniak A. Social contacts and production of 50-kHz short ultrasonic calls in adult rats. J Comp Psychol 2002; 116:73–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kelm-Nelson CA, Lenell C, Johnson AM, Ciucci MR. Chapter 4 - Laryngeal Activity for Production of Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Rats. In: Brudzynski SM, ed. Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience: Elsevier, 2018:37–43. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Riede T Subglottal pressure, tracheal airflow, and intrinsic laryngeal muscle activity during rat ultrasound vocalization. Journal Neurophysiology 2011; 106:2580–2592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brudzynski SM. Principles of rat communication: Quantitative parameters of ultrasonic calls in rats. Behav Genet 2005; 35:85–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wöhr M, Houx B, Schwarting RKW, Spruijt B. Effects of experience and context on 50-kHz vocalizations in rats. Physiol Behav 2008; 93:766–776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wöhr M, Schwarting RW. Affective communication in rodents: ultrasonic vocalizations as a tool for research on emotion and motivation. Cell Tissue Res 2013; 354:81–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Johnson AM, Ciucci MR, Russell JA, Hammer MJ, Connor NP. Ultrasonic output from the excised rat larynx. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2010; 128:EL75–EL79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Riede T, Borgard HL, Pasch B. Laryngeal airway reconstruction indicates that rodent ultrasonic vocalizations are produced by an edge-tone mechanism. Royal Society open science 2017; 4:170976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nunez AA, Pomerantz SM, Bean NJ, Youngstrom TG. Effects of laryngeal denervation on ultrasound production and male sexual behavior in rodents. Physiol Behav 1985; 34:901–905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Riede T Stereotypic laryngeal and respiratory motor patterns generate different call types in rat ultrasound vocalization. Journal of experimental zoology Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology 2013; 319:213–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Roberts LH. Evidence for the laryngeal source of ultrasonic and audible cries of rodents. J Zool 1975; 175:243–257. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Roberts LH. The rodent ultrasound production mechanism. Ultrasonics 1975; 13:83–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Riede T Rat ultrasonic vocalization shows features of a modular behavior. J Neurosci 2014; 34:6874–6878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Marquis JM, Lettenberger SE, Kelm-Nelson CA. Early-onset Parkinsonian behaviors in female Pink1−/− rats. Behav Brain Res 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stevenson SA, Ciucci MR, Kelm-Nelson CA. Intervention changes acoustic peak frequency and mesolimbic neurochemistry in the Pink1−/− rat model of Parkinson disease. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0220734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Grant LM, Kelm-Nelson CA, Hilby BL et al. Evidence for Early and Progressive Ultrasonic Vocalization and Oromotor Deficits in a PINK1 Gene Knockout Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease. J Neurosci Res 2015; 93:1713–1727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kelm-Nelson CA, Stevenson SA, Ciucci MR. Atp13a2 expression in the periaqueductal gray is decreased in the Pink1 −/− rat model of Parkinson disease. Neurosci Lett 2016; 621:75–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Johnson RA, Kelm-Nelson CA, Ciucci MR. Changes to Ventilation, Vocalization, and Thermal Nociception in the Pink1−/− Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease. J Parkinsons Dis 2020; 10:489–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Glass TJ, Kelm-Nelson CA, Russell JA et al. Laryngeal muscle biology in the Pink1−/− rat model of Parkinson disease. J Appl Physiol 2019; 126:1326–1334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Baptista MAS, Dave KD, Sheth NP et al. A strategy for the generation, characterization and distribution of animal models by The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research. Dis Model Mech 2013; 6:1316–1324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dave KD, De Silva S, Sheth NP et al. Phenotypic characterization of recessive gene knockout rat models of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 2014; 70:190–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences., 2011. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kletzien H, Russell JA, Connor NP. The effects of treadmill running on aging laryngeal muscle structure. Laryngoscope 2016; 126:672–677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kelm-Nelson CA, Gammie S. Gene expression within the periaqueductal gray is linked to vocal behavior and early-onset parkinsonism in Pink1 knockout rats. BMC Genomics 2020; 21:625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Aken BL, Ayling S, Barrell D et al. The Ensembl gene annotation system. Database 2016; 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010; 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Reiner A, Yekutieli D, Benjamini Y. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures. Bioinformatics 2003; 19:368–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12:323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2008; 9:559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Chen EY, Tan CM, Kou Y et al. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pultorak JD, Kelm-Nelson CA, Holt LR, Blue KV, Ciucci MR, Johnson AM. Decreased approach behavior and nucleus accumbens immediate early gene expression in response to Parkinsonian ultrasonic vocalizations in rats. Soc Neurosci 2016; 11:365–379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sun L, Shen R, Agnihotri SK, Chen Y, Huang Z, Büeler H. Lack of PINK1 alters glia innate immune responses and enhances inflammation-induced, nitric oxide-mediated neuron death. Sci Rep 2018; 8:383–383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Al-Jarrah MD, Erekat NS. Treadmill exercise training could attenuate the upregulation of Interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha in the skeletal muscle of mouse model of chronic/progressive Parkinson disease. NeuroRehabilitation 2018; 43:501–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Countryman S, Hicks J, Ramig LO, Smith ME. Supraglottal Hyperadduction in an Individual With Parkinson Disease. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1997; 6:74–84. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Teuber-Hanselmann S, Rekowski J, Vogelgsang J et al. CSF and blood Kallikrein-8: a promising early biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry 2020; 91:40–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pampalakis G, Sykioti V-S, Ximerakis M et al. KLK6 proteolysis is implicated in the turnover and uptake of extracellular alpha-synuclein species. Oncotarget 2017; 8:14502–14515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cullen KP, Grant LM, Kelm-Nelson CA et al. Pink1−/− rats show early-onset swallowing deficits and correlative brainstem pathology. Dysphagia 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Glass TJ, Kelm-Nelson CA, Szot JC, Lake JM, Connor NP, Ciucci MR. Functional characterization of extrinsic tongue muscles in the Pink1−/− rat model of Parkinson disease. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240366–e0240366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Brasier AR. The NF-kappaB regulatory network. Cardiovasc Toxicol 2006; 6:111–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Liu T, Zhang L, Joo D, Sun S-C. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 2017; 2:17023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Flood PM, Qian L, Peterson LJ et al. Transcriptional Factor NF-κB as a Target for Therapy in Parkinson’s Disease. Parkinsons Dis 2011; 2011:216298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Singh SS, Rai SN, Birla H, Zahra W, Rathore AS, Singh SP. NF-κB-Mediated Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease and Potential Therapeutic Effect of Polyphenols. Neurotox Res 2020; 37:491–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bellucci A, Bubacco L, Longhena F et al. Nuclear Factor-κB Dysregulation and α-Synuclein Pathology: Critical Interplay in the Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s Disease. Front Aging Neurosci 2020; 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Mogi M, Harada M, Kondo T et al. Interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-6, epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-alpha are elevated in the brain from parkinsonian patients. Neurosci Lett 1994; 180:147–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Nagatsu T, Mogi M, Ichinose H, Togari A. Cytokines in Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm Suppl 2000:143–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hunot S, Brugg B, Ricard D et al. Nuclear translocation of NF-kappaB is increased in dopaminergic neurons of patients with parkinson disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94:7531–7536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bohush A, Niewiadomska G, Filipek A. Role of Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase Signaling in Parkinson’s Disease. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:2973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.He J, Zhong W, Zhang M, Zhang R, Hu W. P38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase and Parkinson’s Disease. Transl Neurosci 2018; 9:147–153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Villeneuve L, Purnell P, Boska M, Fox H. Early Expression of Parkinson’s Disease-Related Mitochondrial Abnormalities in PINK1 Knockout Rats. Mol Neurobiol 2014:1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Table 3. Significant gene list. Results of a differential gene expression (protein coding genes) in the TA of male rats. Significant annotated gene list with categories.
Supplementary Table 1. RSEM output. RNA-Seq data used to analyze differential gene expression using EdgeR. Genotype and rat IDs are listed to the right.
Supplementary Table 2. EdgeR output. Results of a differential gene expression. Analysis of RNA-Seq data using EdgeR. A negative logFC indicates that gene expression is down regulated in the Pink1−/− rats.
Supplementary Table 4. WGCNA data. Gene modules identified by WGCNA.
