Summary
Impaired hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism are hallmarks of type 2 diabetes. Increased sulfide production or sulfide donor compounds may beneficially regulate hepatic metabolism. Disposal of sulfide through the sulfide oxidation pathway (SOP) is critical for maintaining sulfide within a safe physiological range. We show that mice lacking the liver- enriched mitochondrial SOP enzyme thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (Tst−/− mice) exhibit high circulating sulfide, increased gluconeogenesis, hypertriglyceridemia, and fatty liver. Unexpectedly, hepatic sulfide levels are normal in Tst−/− mice because of exaggerated induction of sulfide disposal, with associated suppression of global protein persulfidation and nuclear respiratory factor 2 target protein levels. Hepatic proteomic and persulfidomic profiles converge on gluconeogenesis and lipid metabolism, revealing a selective deficit in medium-chain fatty acid oxidation in Tst−/− mice. We reveal a critical role of TST in hepatic metabolism that has implications for sulfide donor strategies in the context of metabolic disease.
Keywords: type 2 diabetes, sulfide, persulfidation, gluconeogenesis, fatty liver, thiosulfate sulfur transferase, insulin sensitivity, sulfide oxidation pathway, sulfide donor, TST
Graphical abstract
Highlights
-
•
TST deficiency elevates sulfide, invoking exaggerated hepatic sulfide disposal
-
•
Exaggerated sulfide disposal triggers global hepatic protein underpersulfidation
-
•
Skewed persulfidation is associated with higher gluconeogenesis and impaired fat oxidation
-
•
Diabetogenic hepatic metabolism dominates over apparent peripheral insulin sensitization
Carter et al. show that mice lacking the mitochondrial sulfide oxidation pathway enzyme TST have high systemic sulfide levels that invoke an alternative hepatic sulfide disposal strategy. Consequently, hepatic metabolism is dominantly skewed toward a diabetogenic profile despite peripheral insulin sensitization. This has implications for sulfide donor therapeutic agents.
Introduction
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) continues to soar in parallel with that of obesity (World Health Organization, 2016). Increased hepatic glucose production and aberrant hepatic lipid metabolism are cardinal features of T2D (Consoli et al., 1989; Lewis et al., 2002). Dysregulation of hepatic nutrient metabolism in T2D is a promising area for therapeutic intervention because it precipitates the more severe liver pathologies that manifest along the spectrum of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), steatosis, steatohepatitis, and hepatocellular carcinoma (Caron et al., 2011).
Hydrogen sulfide (hereafter referred to as sulfide), an endogenously produced gaseous signaling molecule (Abe and Kimura, 1996; Wang, 2012; Mishanina et al., 2015; Filipovic et al., 2017), has recently emerged as a modulator of nutrient metabolism (Desai et al., 2011; Szabo, 2011; Hine et al., 2015; Carter and Morton, 2016). Enzymatic sulfide production from sulfur amino acids is catalyzed by cystathionine beta synthase (CBS), cystathionine gamma lyase (CTH) (Chen et al., 2004; Singh et al., 2009), and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (MPST) (Shibuya et al., 2009; Mikami et al., 2011; Yadav et al., 2013). Thioredoxin-mediated reduction of cysteine persulfides on proteins also regulates free sulfide and cysteine persulfide levels (Wedmann et al., 2016). Endogenously produced and exogenously administered sulfide specifically influences hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism (Mani et al., 2014; Pichette and Gagnon, 2016). Thus, in vitro, treatment of murine hepatocytes with sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), or overexpression of rat Cth in HepG2 liver cells increased glucose production through increased gluconeogenesis and reduced glycogen storage (Zhang et al., 2013). Conversely, glucose production was lower in hepatocytes from Cth gene knockout (Cth−/−) mice, which exhibit low sulfide production (Zhang et al., 2013). Elevation of sulfide with NaHS administration in vivo reduced cholesterol and triglyceride accumulation in the liver of high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice (Wu et al., 2015). In contrast, inter-crossing of sulfide production-deficient Cth−/− mice with the hyperlipidemic Apoe−/− mouse strain (Cth−/−Apoe−/−) produced a phenotype of elevated plasma cholesterol following exposure to an atherogenic diet (Mani et al., 2013). Consistent with their higher cholesterol, Cth−/−Apoe−/− mice developed fatty streak lesions earlier than Apoe−/− mice, and this effect was reversed by NaHS administration (Mani et al., 2013). Sulfide may also indirectly affect hepatic nutrient metabolism through its effect on hepatic artery vasorelaxation and, thus, liver perfusion (Fiorucci et al., 2005; Distrutti et al., 2008). The apparently beneficial effects of sulfide administration in multiple disease indications has led to a major drive toward development of targeted H2S donor molecules as a therapeutic approach (Whiteman et al., 2011; Sestito et al., 2017). However, an often overlooked aspect of net sulfide exposure, key to the efficacy of therapeutic H2S donors, is that it is regulated through its oxidative disposal. Thus, endogenous sulfide exposure is actively limited to prevent mitochondrial respiratory toxicity (Reiffenstein, 1992; Tiranti et al., 2009; Libiad et al., 2018). Sulfide is oxidized rapidly (Hildebrandt and Grieshaber, 2008; Norris et al., 2011) through the mitochondrial sulfide oxidation pathway (SOP), consisting of sulfide quinone oxidoreductase (SQOR), persulfide dioxygenase (ETHE1/PDO), and thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (TST; also known as rhodanese) (Hildebrandt and Grieshaber, 2008; Jackson et al., 2012; Libiad et al., 2014). The liver is highly abundant in SOP enzymes and is a major organ of whole-body sulfide disposal (Norris et al., 2011). Mice lacking the Ethe1 gene (Ethe1−/−) die of fatal sulfide toxicity (Tiranti et al., 2009), consistent with its critical role in sulfide oxidation and the severe pathological consequences of unchecked sulfide buildup in tissues. However, the importance of mitochondrial TST in the SOP in vivo remains obscure. In contrast to Ethe1−/− mice, Tst−/− mice were grossly normal despite exhibiting substantially elevated blood sulfide levels, as implied by qualitative measures (Morton et al., 2016). This revealed an important but distinct role of TST in the SOP in vivo. Nevertheless, Tst−/− mice showed an apparently diabetogenic impairment of glucose tolerance (Morton et al., 2016), consistent with the concept that increased sulfide promotes hepatic glucose production (Zhang et al., 2013). Because Tst deficiency is a model of chronic but viable sulfide elevation, determining the molecular mechanisms driving the aberrant metabolic profile can provide important insights into the optimal range for therapeutic sulfide exposure, particularly in light of the current interest in developing mitochondrially targeted sulfide donors (Gerő et al., 2016; Karwi et al., 2018). To this end, we sought to define the effect of Tst deficiency on the underlying molecular pathways that affect hepatic metabolism.
Results
Tst−/− mice exhibit increased hepatic gluconeogenesis and dyslipidemia despite mild peripheral insulin sensitization
TST mRNA expression is highest in the liver (http://biogps.org/#goto=genereport&id=22117; tissue hierarchy of expression was validated in our own mouse substrain; Figure S1A). We therefore hypothesized that liver TST deficiency was the principal driver of the impaired glucose tolerance observed previously in Tst−/− mice (Morton et al., 2016). Tst−/− mice exhibited higher glucose levels than C57BL/6J controls in response to pyruvate challenge, consistent with higher hepatic glucose production (Figure 1A). We next tested phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) activity, a key enzyme of de novo hepatic glucose synthesis, and found that it was higher in liver homogenates from Tst−/− mice (Figure 1B). Next we performed a 1-h 13C3-pyruvate metabolite pulse incorporation experiment in isolated hepatocytes cultured in 12C3-pyruvate-free medium. Hepatocytes from Tst−/− mice displayed 13C labeling consistent with increased metabolism of pyruvate to oxaloacetate, a critical early step in gluconeogenesis. Specifically, aspartate, which is derived from pyruvate via oxaloacetate, was increased significantly in Tst−/− hepatocytes (Figure 1C). A trend toward higher 13C3 malate and lower 13C2 acetyl-coenzyme A (CoA) was also observed (Figures S1B and S1C). 13C3 lactate was similar between genotypes, suggesting a similar activity of glycolytic disposal of pyruvate through lactate dehydrogenase (Figures S1B and S1C). Isotopologue distribution is shown in Figure S1C. Total pool sizes for all measured metabolites were similar between genotypes (Figure S1D). Although not a direct measure of glucose production, the data from in vitro hepatocytes suggested skewing of hepatocyte metabolism toward gluconeogenesis, and we therefore investigated this possibility. Indeed, consistent with increased endogenous glucose production in Tst−/− mice, fasting plasma glucose was higher in Tst−/− mice relative to 6J mice during the pre-clamp 3-3H glucose tracer infusion phase (60–90 min after the tracer) of euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic (EH) clamp experiments (Figure 1D; Table S1A). Higher plasma glucose levels in Tst−/− mice under these conditions was not explained by lower glucose utilization in Tst−/− mice; glycogen synthesis and glycolysis were comparable between genotypes across 60–90 min (Table S1A). Glucose turnover, a derived parameter used to infer glucose production, was also comparable between genotypes (Table S1A). However, derivation of glucose turnover requires that glucose levels are stable during the period in which it is calculated. In our pre-clamp baseline period, a highly significant effect of time (Figure 1D) indicated that this assumption was not met; thus, true endogenous glucose production cannot be inferred from the glucose turnover parameter in this instance. Combined with the pyruvate tolerance, PEPCK activity, and 13C3-pyruvate pulse data, higher fasting glucose levels in Tst−/− mice, given comparable glucose utilization, are most likely due to higher endogenous glucose production.
Figure 1.
Tst deletion results in impaired glucose and lipid metabolism
(A) Plasma glucose over 120 min, following pyruvate (i.p., 1.5 mg/g) administration in overnight-fasted C57BL/6J (black line, n = 9) and Tst−/− (red line, n = 8) ND-fed mice.
(B) Extinction of NADH, measured by absorbance at 340 nm, coupled to PEPCK activity from liver homogenates taken from C57BL/6J (white bar, n = 6) and Tst—/— (red bar, n = 6) ND-fed mice.
(C) Production of 13C (M+3) aspartate generated after a 1-h pulse of 1 mM 3-carbon labeled 13C (M+3) pyruvate in 12C pyruvate-free medium, expressed as a percentage of the total amount of detected metabolite, in primary hepatocytes from C57BL/6J (white bars, n = 6) and Tst−/− (red bars, n = 5) ND-fed mice.
(D) Blood glucose during the pre-clamp phase of the EH clamp from C57BL/6J (black lines) and Tst−/− (red lines) mice fed a control (ND, solid lines, n = 3, 6) or high-fat diet (HFD, broken lines, n = 6, 7).
(E) Mean integrated radioactive glucose (inversely related to whole-body glucose uptake) during a EH clamp from ND-fed C57BL/6J control (white, n = 3) and Tst−/− (red, n = 6) mice.
(F) Plasma glucose, expressed as percent of baseline glucose, over 120 min following insulin (i.p., 1 mU/g) administration in 4-h-fasted C57BL/6J (black line, n = 8) and Tst−/− (red line, n = 7) ND-fed mice.
(G) HPLC-quantified total and VLDL plasma triglyceride in 4-h-fasted C57BL/6J (white bar, n = 6) and Tst−/− (red bar, n = 6) ND-fed mice.
(H) Representative light microscopy images of liver sections stained with oil red O from normal diet (ND)-fed or HFD-fed C57BL/6J and Tst−/− mice. Magnification is 40X.
(I) Analysis of the area of red staining (oil red O) after thresholding, using ImageJ, from ND-fed (no pattern, n = 3–4/genotype) or HFD-fed (hatched pattern, n = 4–5/genotype) C57BL/6J (white bars) and Tst−/− (red bars) mice.
Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Significance was calculated using repeated-measures ANOVA (A and F), 2-way ANOVA (I), 3-way repeated-measures ANOVA (D), or unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test (B, C, E, and G); ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. For (D), significant effects of time (∗∗∗∗), diet (∗) and genotype (∗) were found. For (F), the analysis was performed on absolute glucose values and demonstrated a significant effect of time (∗∗∗∗) and an interaction between time and genotype (∗). t tests revealed that the decrement of glucose from baseline 30 and 60 min after insulin was greater in Tst−/− mice (∗). For (I), no main genotype effect was found, but a significant effect of diet (∗∗∗) and an interaction (∗) were found. Post hoc analysis using Sidak’s multiple comparison test shows an effect of diet on the 6J controls (∗∗∗), whereas no effect of diet is found on Tst−/− mice. See also Figures S1 and S2 and Table S1.
We next wished to explore whether the changes to glucose metabolism were driven by insulin resistance. Liver glycogen, a marker of long-term carbohydrate storage typically impaired with insulin resistance, was comparable between Tst−/− and C57BL/6J control mice (Figure S2A). Despite unchanged steady-state markers of hepatic insulin sensitivity, impaired glucose tolerance, described previously in Tst−/− mice (Morton et al., 2016), suggested that whole-body, and usually hepatic, insulin resistance was present. We investigated this using the euglycemic clamp, where, unexpectedly, we observed whole-body insulin sensitization under these short-term steady-state conditions. During the clamp, when insulin was high and blood glucose levels were maintained constant, the glucose infusion rate was comparable between genotypes (Table S1B). However, an increase in whole-body glucose uptake (integral glucose) by tissues in Tst−/− mice was apparent (Figure 1E; Table S1B), supporting increased peripheral insulin sensitivity, with a directionally consistent trend for increased glucose uptake into several tissues. We confirmed this finding using standard insulin tolerance tests, where the glucose decrement in response to insulin was greater in Tst−/− mice (Figure 1F; Figure S2B). These data demonstrate a net increase in dynamic whole-body insulin sensitivity despite increased hepatic glucose output in Tst−/− mice. Finally, we assessed whole-body glucose homeostasis with the EH clamp method after chronic HFD feeding. Under these conditions, Tst−/− mice maintained increased hepatic glucose output (Figure 1D) but showed convergence of the insulin sensitivity profile with that of insulin-resistant C57BL/6J mice.
We also assessed whether Tst deficiency was associated with impaired lipid metabolism, another hallmark of diabetes. Fast protein liquid chromatography analysis of triglyceride levels and their lipoprotein distribution revealed significantly higher total plasma triglycerides in Tst−/− mice (Figure 1G). The higher triglyceride was selectively associated with an increased very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) triglyceride fraction (Figure 1G), consistent with a dominant liver-driven impairment in lipid metabolism (Mason, 1998). Total and distinct lipoprotein fraction plasma cholesterol levels were similar between genotypes (Figures S2C and S2D), suggestive of a triglyceride-selective effect of Tst deficiency on hepatic lipid efflux. HFD feeding significantly increased the liver lipid content of C57BL/6J mice but did not further increase the elevated lipid levels in the liver of Tst−/− mice (Figures 1H and 1I).
TST deficiency elicits compensatory hepatic sulfide disposal mechanisms that drive reduced global protein persulfidation
A role of TST in disposal of sulfide has been suggested by its participation in the SOP (Hildebrandt and Grieshaber, 2008; Libiad et al., 2014) and supported in vivo by the qualitatively higher blood sulfide of Tst−/− mice (Morton et al., 2016), shown schematically in Figure 2A. Here we quantified circulating sulfide, showing an approximately 10-fold elevation in the blood and plasma of Tst−/− mice (Table 1). Thiosulfate, an oxidized metabolite of sulfide (Vitvitsky et al., 2015, 2017) and a TST substrate (Banerjee et al., 2015), was approximately 20-fold higher in the plasma (Table 1) and profoundly higher (450-fold) in the urine (Table 1) of Tst−/− mice compared with C57BL/6J mice. Reduced glutathione (rGSH) levels were ∼2-fold higher in the plasma of Tst−/− mice (Table 1). To determine any direct hepatic contribution to the elevated systemic sulfide in vivo, whole blood was sampled from the inferior vena cava (IVC) (Table 1). IVC sulfide levels tended to be higher in Tst−/− mice, but the magnitude of the increase (∼3-fold) did not parallel that in trunk blood (∼10-fold), suggesting that the liver was not a major source of the elevated circulating sulfide. Surprisingly, liver homogenate sulfide, thiosulfate, cysteine, and GSH levels were similar between Tst−/− and C57BL/6J mice (Table 1). Further, cultured hepatocytes from Tst−/− and C57BL/6J mice exhibited similar intracellular sulfide levels, as estimated using P3, a sulfide-selective fluorescent probe (Singha et al., 2015; Table 1). Mitochondrial sulfide levels in the liver, reported by MitoA/MitoN (Arndt et al., 2017), were similarly unchanged between genotypes (Table 1). The apparently unaltered hepatic steady-state sulfide levels, despite higher circulating sulfide, suggested that a profound homeostatic mechanism was invoked in the liver of Tst−/− mice. We assessed respiratory sulfide disposal (antimycin sensitive) and found that this was increased markedly in hepatocytes from Tst−/− mice, whereas antimycin-insensitive sulfide disposal was relatively reduced compared with hepatocytes from C57BL/6J mice (Table S2). Isolated liver mitochondria from Tst−/− hepatocytes also exhibited a higher sulfide disposal rate (Table S2). In addition, cysteine and GSH were excreted at higher levels from Tst−/− hepatocytes under basal conditions and after stimulation of sulfur amino acid metabolism by addition of methionine (Figures 2B and 2C). Consistent with higher GSH turnover, hepatocytes from Tst−/− mice showed resistance to exogenous H2O2-mediated mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (Figure S3). We next determined the global hepatic protein persulfidation profile, the major post-translational modification mediated by sulfide (Krishnan et al., 2011; Kabil et al., 2014; Koike et al., 2017). Mass spectrometry analysis of maleimide-labeled liver peptides revealed a greater abundance of peptides with a lower persulfidation level (underpersulfidated) in the liver of Tst−/− mice (Figure 2D). We confirmed this using semiquantitative western blot analysis on pulled down maleimide-labeled proteins (Figure 2E). Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of underpersulfidated peptides (20 GO categories; Table 2) showed enrichment for “FAD-binding, methyl transferase, peroxisome, acyl-CoA dehydrogenase activity, and transaminase.” Overpersulfidated peptides (8 GO categories; Table 2) were predominantly “nicotinamide metabolism.” Pathway-specific peptide analysis showed a bias for over-persulfidation in gluconeogenesis proteins (Figure S4A) and a significantly higher magnitude of change (independent of direction of change) in persulfidation compared with global persulfidomic changes between C57BL/6J and Tst−/− mice (Figure S4B).
Figure 2.
Tst deletion results in increased hepatic sulfur excretion and a reduction of protein persulfidation
(A) Schematic showing mammalian metabolism of hydrogen sulfide. The canonical production enzymes are shown in the cytosol. MPST, mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase; CBS, cystathionine beta synthase; CTH, cystathionine gamma lyase. Mitochondrial oxidation and disposal of hydrogen sulfide occurs through the SOP through the actions of SQOR (sulfide quinone oxidoreductase), ETHE1 (PDO), TST (thiosulfate sulfurtransferase), and SUOX (sulfite oxidase). These seven enzymes are major contributors to intracellular sulfide (and other inorganic sulfur) metabolism. For simplicity, the diagram does not include sulfide production, which can occur within mitochondria, or disposal pathways in the cytosol. The identity of oxidized sulfur species produced by SQOR remain disputed. The precise role of TST and other enzymes shown here remains under investigation.
(B) Cysteine concentrations (MBB-HPLC) in medium incubated with primary hepatocytes in the presence (hatched pattern) or absence (no pattern) of 1 mM methionine from C57BL/6J (white bars, n = 4/treatment) and Tst−/− (red bars, n = 4/treatment) mice.
(C) GSH concentrations (MBB-HPLC) in medium incubated with primary hepatocytes in the presence (hatched pattern) or absence (no pattern) of 1 mM methionine from C57BL/6J (white bars, n = 4/treatment) and Tst−/− (red bars, n = 4/treatment) mice.
(D) Pie chart depicting the proportion of liver peptides that are significantly higher (82 peptides, purple space) or lower (311 peptides, yellow space) in their persulfidation rate in Tst−/− (n = 3) relative to C57BL/6J (n = 3) mice.
(E) Total DTT-released cysteine-persulfidated liver protein as measured by REVERT total protein stain following western blotting, normalized to the total input protein of the sample from Tst−/− (red bar, n = 4) and C57BL/6J (white bar, n = 4) mice.
Data with error bars are represented as mean ± SEM. Significance was calculated using 2-way ANOVA (B and C) or Student’s t test (E); ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01. For (B) and (C), the 2-way ANOVA reveals a main effect of genotype, indicated by ∗ or ∗∗ on the histogram. A significant effect of methionine was also found for (B) and (C), not indicated on the histogram. For (D), peptides were selected as being significant at a P-diff of 0.95 or greater. See also Figure S3 and Table S2.
Table 1.
Sulfur species in blood, urine, tissue, and cells
C57BL/6J | Tst−/− | Tst−/−/6J ratio | Significance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trunk blood (micromolar)a | ||||||
MBB-S (sulfide) | 2.28 ± 0.43 | 22.18 ± 0.85 | 9.73 | ∗∗∗∗ | ||
MBB-SSO3 (thiosulfate) | N/D | 6.25 ± 3.17 | n.c. | ns | ||
Trunk plasma (micromolar)b | ||||||
MBB-S (sulfide) | 1.88 ± 0.64 | 24.50 ± 2.02 | 13.03 | ∗∗∗∗ | ||
MBB-SSO3 (thiosulfate) | 3.99 ± 0.99 | 80.29 ± 13.6 | 20.12 | ∗∗ | ||
MBB-GSH (reduced GSH) | 48.0 ± 1.15 | 86.25 ± 6.27 | 1.80 | ∗∗∗ | ||
Urine (micromoles/creatine/24 h)c | ||||||
MBB-SSO3 (thiosulfate) | 4.99 ± 2.6 | 2374 ± 319 | 475.75 | ∗∗∗∗ | ||
IVC (micromolar)d | ||||||
MBB-S (sulfide) | 1.22 ± 0.20 | 3.58 ± 0.87 | 2.93 | ns (0.08) | ||
MBB-SSO3 (thiosulfate) | 6.58 ± 4.51 | 88.3 ± 13.0 | 13.42 | ∗ | ||
Liver (micromoles/kg wet liver)e | ||||||
MBB-S (sulfide) | 13 ± 1 | 17 ± 3 | 1.31 | ns | ||
MBB-SSO3 (thiosulfate) | 4 ± 1 | 15 ± 7 | 3.75 | ns | ||
DNFB-GSH (reduced GSH) | 6,470 ± 380 | 6,850 ± 30 | 1.04 | ns | ||
DNFB-cysteine (cysteine) | 82 ± 13 | 67 ± 11 | 0.82 | ns | ||
Sulfide P3 fluorescence (A510 nm/protein)f | ||||||
Hepatocyte | 7.22 ± 1.00 | 7.89 ± 0.80 | 1.09 | ns | ||
Mitochondrial sulfide (MitoA)g | ||||||
Liver | 0.78 ± 0.16 | 1.14 ± 0.45 | 1.46 | ns |
Tst deletion results in altered sulfur metabolites in blood and liver. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Significance was calculated using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. MMB; monobromobimane.
Sulfide dibimane and thiosulfate-MBB, measured by fluorescence detection following HPLC, from whole blood taken from trunk blood of ND-fed C57BL/6J (n = 4) and Tst−/− (n = 4) mice.
Sulfide dibimane, thiosulfate-MBB, and rGSH-MBB, measured by fluorescence detection following HPLC, from EDTA-plasma of ND-fed C57BL/6J (n = 4) and Tst−/− (n = 4) mice.
Thiosulfate-MBB corrected for creatinine from 24-h urine samples, taken from ND-fed C57Bl6/J (n = 4) and Tst−/− (n = 5) mice.
Sulfide dibimane and thiosulfate-MBB from whole blood taken from the IVC downstream of the hepatic vein of ND-fed C57BL/6J (n = 3) and Tst−/− (n = 3) mice.
Sulfide dibimane, thiosulfate-MBB, rGSH-MBB, and cysteine-MBB from whole liver (n = 4/genotype) of ND-fed C57BL/6J (n = 4) and Tst−/− (n = 4) mice.
Fluorescence from cultured hepatocytes following incubation with P3 (sulfide reactive probe) from ND-fed C57BL/6J (n = 4) and Tst−/− (n = 4) mice.
Ratio of MitoN/MitoA from the liver of ND-fed C57BL/6J (n = 5) and Tst−/− (n = 5) mice.
Table 2.
Tst deletion results in differential persulfidation rate of liver proteins
GO ID | Name | Direction (Tst−/− versus 6J) | Genes |
---|---|---|---|
GO terms identified by log fold change | |||
0050660 | FAD binding | decreased | 12 |
0008168 | methyltransferase activity | decreased | 9 |
9 | |||
0016741 | transferase activity, transferring one-carbon groups | decreased | 9 |
0008565 | protein transporter activity | decreased | 8 |
0008238 | exopeptidase activity | decreased | 7 |
0005777 | peroxisome | decreased | 7 |
0042579 | microbody | decreased | 7 |
0003995 | acyl-CoA dehydrogenase activity | decreased | 6 |
0008483 | transaminase activity | decreased | 6 |
0016769 | transferase activity, transferring nitrogenous groups | decreased | 6 |
0008757 | S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase activity | decreased | 6 |
0016655 | oxidoreductase activity, acting on NADH/NADPH, quinone | decreased | 5 |
0004177 | aminopeptidase activity | decreased | 5 |
0000059 | protein import into nucleus, docking | decreased | 3 |
0005643 | nuclear pore | decreased | 3 |
0031965 | nuclear membrane | decreased | 3 |
0044453 | nuclear membrane part | decreased | 3 |
0046930 | pore complex | decreased | 3 |
0015629 | actin cytoskeleton | decreased | 3 |
0016652 | oxidoreductase activity, NADH/NADPH, NAD/NADP acceptor | decreased | 3 |
0050662 | coenzyme binding | increased | 5 |
5 | |||
4 | |||
4 | |||
4 | |||
3 | |||
3 | |||
0016651 | oxidoreductase activity, NADH/NADPH, | increased | 5 |
0003954 | NADH dehydrogenase activity | increased | 4 |
0008137 | NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) activity | increased | 4 |
0050136 | NADH dehydrogenase (quinone) activity | increased | 4 |
0006739 | NADP metabolism | increased | 3 |
0006769 | nicotinamide metabolism | increased | 3 |
0006733 | oxidoreduction coenzyme metabolism | increased | 3 |
Shown are significant GO terms represented by peptides with different persulfidation rates in ND-fed Tst−/− mouse liver relative to C57BL/6J mice. “Direction” indicates whether persulfidation is decreased or increased in Tst−/− relative to C57BL/6J mice. “Genes” indicates the number of genes in Tst−/− mice that represent the changes driving the GO term.
The hepatic proteome of Tst−/− mice reveals a distinct molecular signature of altered sulfur and mitochondrial nutrient metabolism
To gain molecular insight into the mechanisms underlying the apparently diabetogenic phenotype in Tst−/− mice, we compared hepatic proteomes of normal diet (ND)-fed mice. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis revealed 4 up-regulated pathways in the liver of Tst−/− mice related to amino acid metabolism, including sulfur amino acids, and sulfur metabolism (Table 3). GO analysis revealed 95 significantly up-regulated categories in the liver of Tst−/− mice (Table S3A). Among the top categories, 7 referred to amino acid metabolism and 1 referred to the organellar term “mitochondrion.” KEGG analysis revealed 27 down-regulated pathways in the liver of Tst−/− mice (Table 3), including phase 1 and 2 detoxification pathways (cytochrome P450s, GSH, and glucuronidation) and “lysosome” and “protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum” organellar terms. 213 GO terms were significantly down-regulated in Tst−/− mice (Table S4B). Among the most significant down-regulated terms were phase 2 detoxification “glutathione binding,” “glutathione transferase activity,” and “endoplasmic reticulum” categories. We validated the broadly consistent direction of change in a representative subset of proteins (Figures S5A and S5D). The most robust change we observed was increased MPST protein in whole liver (Figures S5A and S5D) and mitochondrial subfractions (Figures S5B and S5D). This change was remarkable because mRNA levels for Mpst were lower in Tst−/− mice (Figure S5C), likely as a result of loss of proximal Mpst promoter function; Mpst is a paralog of Tst (Nagahara, 2011) juxtaposed approximately 1 kb from the Tst gene. Protein levels for other sulfide-producing and disposal enzymes were comparable between genotypes (Table S4). A focused comparison of canonical proteins in glucose and lipid metabolism pathways (Table S5) revealed four GO categories that were down-regulated in Tst−/− mice: “lipid metabolic process,” “fatty acid beta-oxidation,” “acyl-CoA dehydrogenase activity,” and “acyl-CoA hydrolase activity” (Table S5). Canonical insulin-regulated proteins were largely comparable between genotypes (Table S6).
Table 3.
Protein abundance and persulfidation in ND-fed Tst−/− liver
Entry | Name | Genes | Significance |
---|---|---|---|
KEGG pathways increased in ND Tst−/−livera | |||
00250 | alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism | 6 | ∗∗∗ |
00260 | glycine, serine, and threonine metabolism | 5 | ∗∗ |
00270 | cysteine and methionine metabolism | 4 | ∗ |
04122 | sulfur relay system | 2 | ∗ |
KEGG pathways reduced in ND Tst−/−liverb | |||
00980 | metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 | 12 | ∗∗∗∗ |
00982 | drug metabolism – cytochrome P450 | 12 | ∗∗∗∗ |
05204 | chemical carcinogenesis | 12 | ∗∗∗∗ |
00480 | glutathione metabolism | 8 | ∗∗∗ |
00040 | pentose and glucoronate interconversions | 5 | ∗∗ |
04142 | lysosome | 6 | ∗∗ |
04390 | Hippo signaling pathway | 4 | ∗∗ |
00500 | starch and sucrose metabolism | 5 | ∗∗ |
05215 | prostate cancer | 3 | ∗∗ |
04024 | cAMP signaling pathway | 4 | ∗ |
04141 | protein processing in ER | 9 | ∗ |
05211 | renal cell carcinoma | 3 | ∗ |
00830 | retinol metabolism | 6 | ∗ |
00053 | ascorbate and aldarate metabolism | 4 | ∗ |
00860 | porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism | 4 | ∗ |
04722 | neurotrophin signaling pathway | 3 | ∗ |
04670 | leukocyte transendothelial migration | 4 | ∗ |
04010 | MAPK signaling pathway | 4 | ∗ |
04720 | long-term potentiation | 2 | ∗ |
04914 | progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation | 2 | ∗ |
04062 | chemokine signaling pathway | 3 | ∗ |
04110 | cell cycle | 3 | ∗ |
04015 | Rap1 signaling pathway | 4 | ∗ |
00983 | drug metabolism – other enzymes | 5 | ∗ |
04918 | thyroid hormone synthesis | 3 | ∗ |
04612 | antigen processing and presentation | 3 | ∗ |
05203 | viral carcinogenesis | 5 | ∗ |
GO terms common to persulfidome and proteome in ND Tst−/−liverc | |||
GO ID | GO term | Persulfidation (Tst−/− versus 6J) | Abundance (Tst−/− versus 6J) |
0008483 | transaminase activity | decreased | increased |
0016769 | transferase activity, transferring nitrogenous groups | decreased | increased |
0003995 | acyl-CoA dehydrogenase activity | decreased | decreased |
0005777 | peroxisome | decreased | decreased |
0042579 | microbody | decreased | decreased |
∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001.
Significant KEGG pathway terms represented by proteins that are more abundant in the liver of ND-fed Tst−/− compared with ND-fed C57BL/6J mice.
Significant KEGG pathway terms represented by proteins that are less abundant in the liver of ND-fed Tst−/−compared with ND-fed C57BL/6J mice. “Genes” indicates the number of genes in Tst−/− mice that represent the changes driving the KEGG pathway.
GO terms that are significantly regulated at the level of cysteine persulfidation and protein abundance in the liver of ND-fed Tst−/−compared with ND-fed C57BL/6J mice.
Hepatic protein expression in Tst−/− mice is consistent with lower NRF2 activation
We performed a transcription factor binding site (TFBS) enrichment analysis in the promoters of proteins that were up-regulated in the liver of Tst−/− mice to look for potential hub transcriptional drivers of the proteome profile (Figure S6A). This revealed a statistically significant under-representation of TFBS for the sulfide-responsive (Yang et al., 2013; Xie et al., 2016) NRF2 transcription factor (Figure S6A). Consistent with reduced hepatic NRF2 activation, 10 of 47 known NRF2-regulated proteins were lower in the liver of ND-fed Tst−/− mice compared with C57BL/6J mice (Figure S6B).
The proteome of TST deficiency versus HFD response in C57BL/6J mice reveals distinct regulation of lipid metabolism, sulfide metabolism, and detoxification pathways
We examined mechanistic commonalities between the diabetogenic hepatic phenotype of Tst−/− mice and that induced by the diabetogenic HFD feeding regimen in C57BL/6J mice. ND-fed Tst−/− mice were in a pre-existing diabetogenic state (Figure 1) that does not worsen with HFD feeding (Figures 1H and 1I; Table S1), suggesting gross phenotypic convergence of the two genotypes after HFD feeding. We compared the identity and direction of change of the 188 proteins differentially expressed in ND-fed Tst−/− mice (versus ND-fed C57BL/6J mice; Figure 3A) with proteins that were differentially expressed in response to HFD feeding in C57BL/6J mice (432 proteins; Figure 3A). There was a striking 67% overlap in individual proteins (126) in this comparison (Figure 3A). When we analyzed these two protein signatures for directionally shared pathways, one upregulated KEGG pathway, “glycine, serine and threonine metabolism” (Table S7A), and 12 downregulated KEGG pathways, including “drug metabolism” and “endoplasmic reticulum” (Table S8B), were common to the liver of ND-fed Tst−/− and HFD-fed C57BL/6J mice. Consistent with a pre-existing HFD-like proteome, the dynamic response to HFD in the liver of Tst−/− mice was muted relative to that observed in C57BL6J mice (106 proteins, a 4-fold lower response; Figure 3B). Focusing on the sulfide pathway, MPST and sulfite oxidase (SUOX) were increased by HFD feeding in C57BL/6J and Tst−/− mice (Table S8). The HFD-induced increase in MPST was less pronounced in the liver of Tst−/− mice, likely reflecting that it is already elevated in ND-fed Tst−/− mice. We then considered contrasting rather than congruent proteomics responses arising from TST deficiency versus HFD responses in C57BL/6J mice to illuminate potential novel pathways underlying the otherwise functionally similar diabetogenic hepatic Tst−/− phenotype. 5 KEGG pathways (Table S9A) and 4 GO terms (Table S9B) were regulated oppositely in this comparison. Strikingly, the GO terms were all related to lipid metabolism, which was up-regulated in the HFD response but down-regulated with TST deficiency (Tables S9A and S9B). An organelle-focused protein analysis showed shared upregulation of mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum pathways between TST deficiency (Figure 3C, top row) and C57BL/6J HFD responses (Figure 3C, bottom row) but a striking discordance in peroxisomal protein pathways (upregulated by HFD feeding and downregulated with TST deficiency) and nuclear proteins (downregulated by HFD feeding and upregulated with TST deficiency; Figure 3C).
Figure 3.
Tst deletion engenders a HFD feeding-like hepatic proteome with a distinct organellar signature
(A) Venn diagram representing the number of proteins significantly different (at p < 0.01) between ND-fed Tst−/− and C57BL/6J mice (red circle) and the number of regulated proteins between HFD-fed and ND-fed C57BL/6J (green circle) mice. The overlap (brown) represents proteins regulated in the same direction by both comparisons (n = 4/genotype).
(B) Number of proteins significantly different (at p < 0.01) between 58% HFD and ND in either C57BL/6J (white bar) or Tst−/− mice (red bar) (n = 4/genotype).
(C) Pie charts depicting the proportion of individual liver proteins that are upregulated (blue space) compared with downregulated (yellow space) after GO term categorization according to subcellular location. Top row: ND-fed Tst−/− relative to ND-fed C57BL/6J mice. Bottom row, HFD-fed C57BL/6J relative to ND-fed C57BL/6J mice. See also Table 3 and Figures S5 and S6.
The Tst−/− liver proteome and persulfidome converge on transamination and lipid oxidation pathways
To assess whether conservation of changes at the protein and post-translational modification levels can illuminate key regulatory hubs driving the hepatic phenotype, we ran a congruence analysis of the proteome and persulfidome. We found that the GO categories “amino acid,” “lipid metabolism,” and “peroxisome” were regulated significantly at the protein abundance and persulfidation levels in Tst−/− mice (Table 3).
Tst−/− hepatocytes exhibit elevated mitochondrial respiration and a defect in medium-chain fatty acid oxidation
Enhanced respiratory sulfide disposal was found from Tst−/− hepatocytes, and enrichment of mitochondrial proteins was suggested from the liver proteome of the Tst−/− mice (Table S4). We therefore sought to determine whether TST deficiency affected respiratory function and substrate utilization of the hepatocyte. Analysis of electron micrographs prepared from the liver of ND-fed Tst−/− mice and C57BL/6J controls showed morphologically normal mitochondria (Figure 4A). Basal respiration, comprising ATP-linked and leak respiration, was significantly higher in hepatocytes from Tst−/− mice (Figures 4B–4D). Maximal hepatocyte respiratory capacity and non-respiratory oxygen consumption were similar between genotypes (Figures S7A and S7B). In line with phenotypic convergence following HFD feeding, hepatocyte respiration was comparable between genotypes from HFD-fed mice (Figures S7C–S7H). A unique feature of the liver from Tst−/− mice was a decrease in proteins and persulfidation levels of proteins in lipid oxidation pathways. We therefore investigated hepatocyte respiration of lipids. Using a low-pyruvate (100 μM) medium to reveal respiratory dependency on other substrates, we showed that CPT1A-mediated mitochondrial oxidation of endogenous long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs; etomoxir inhibited) was similar between genotypes (Figure 4E). Next we bypassed CPT1A-mediated LCFA transfer and revealed a marked deficit in respiration stimulated by the medium-chain fatty acid octanoate in hepatocytes from Tst−/− mice (Figure 4F). A similar experiment adding back pyruvate revealed comparable stimulation of respiration between genotypes (Figure S7I). In amino acid-free medium, combined glutamine-, aspartate-, and alanine-stimulated hepatocyte respiration was comparable between genotypes (Figure S7J).
Figure 4.
Tst deletion results in increased hepatocyte respiration but impaired medium-chain fat respiration
(A) Electron microscopy images of liver, visualizing mitochondria from ND-fed C57BL/6J (n = 4) or Tst−/− (n = 4) mice.
(B) Seahorse trace representing the mean oxygen consumption rate (OCR), normalized to protein, by hepatocytes from ND-fed C57BL/6J (n = 6) or Tst−/− (n = 6) mice during a mitochondrial stress test.
(C) Respiratory OCR linked to ATP production (oligomycin sensitive) by hepatocytes from ND-fed C57BL/6J (n = 6) or Tst−/− (n = 6) mice, calculated from (B).
(D) Respiratory OCR relating to proton leak (oligomycin insensitive) by hepatocytes from ND-fed C57BL/6J (n = 6) or Tst−/− (n = 6) mice, calculated from (B).
(E) Reduction of maximal uncoupled respiration following inhibition of LCFA mitochondrial import using etomoxir (8 μM) from ND-fed C57BL/6J (n = 4) or Tst−/− (n = 4) mice.
(F) Stimulation of maximal uncoupled respiration following addition of MCFA octanoate (250 μM) from ND-fed C57BL/6J (n = 4) or Tst−/− (n = 4) mice.
Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Significance was calculated using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test (C–F); ∗p < 0.05. See also Figure S7.
Discussion
Elevated TST expression in adipose tissue has been identified as a genetic mechanism driving metabolically protective leanness in mice (Morton et al., 2016). Conversely, Tst−/− mice exhibited impaired glucose tolerance (Morton et al., 2016). However, Tst−/− mice had a subtle adipose tissue phenotype, suggesting a non-adipose origin for impaired glucose homeostasis. We found increased gluconeogenesis, steatosis, and elevated plasma VLDL triglycerides consistent with a predominantly hepatic origin for the diabetogenic phenotype. We cannot rule out a contribution of renal gluconeogenesis to the phenotype, and future work will address this limitation. Unexpectedly, and despite the markedly increased circulating sulfide levels (10-fold), the steady-state sulfide level was normal in the liver of Tst−/− mice. Moreover, we found evidence of multiple mechanisms for increased hepatic sulfide disposal, reduced downstream sulfide signaling, and associated underlying molecular links to an apparently diabetogenic phenotype. Our data suggest that the liver of Tst−/− mice has overshot in its attempt to maximize hepatic sulfide removal, leading indirectly to detrimental metabolic consequences. This involves a combination of distinct compartmentalized cellular responses, including increased respiratory sulfide disposal and export of cysteine and GSH. Upregulation of translation and recruitment of MPST to mitochondria of Tst−/− mice is observed. This response, in the face of reduced transcription of Mpst, suggests a powerful post-transcriptional cellular sulfide-sensing mechanism. Interestingly, if MPST is compensating for TST-mediated sulfide disposal in this context, then it implies a subversion of normal MPST function away from sulfide production (Módis et al., 2013; Szabo et al., 2014; Kimura et al., 2017; Nagahara, 2018). Alternatively, this is a response to a perceived lower-sulfide environment. TST levels were also elevated in the liver of Mpst−/− mice, providing further support for a reciprocal compensatory mechanism between these two enzymes (Nagahara et al., 2019).
The unexpected finding of normal hepatic sulfide levels in Tst−/− mice led us to discover that the metabolic phenotype we observed was driven by the very mechanisms invoked to maintain sulfide within a normal range rather than sulfide excess per se. Several observations were consistent with this. For example, the major amino acid pathways increased in the liver of Tst−/− mice were transaminases involved in metabolism of GSH that support increased export of sulfur equivalents as GSH (and cysteine). These same transaminases support gluconeogenesis by redirecting Krebs cycle intermediates (Rui, 2014; Qian et al., 2015; Sookoian et al., 2016). Reprogramming of amino acid metabolism for sulfide disposal with knockon effects to drive hepatic glucose production are suggested, rather than any change to amino acid-linked mitochondrial respiration in hepatocytes. This is supported by the shift in hepatocyte pyruvate metabolism toward aspartate. In addition, glutathione S-transferases (GST) that inhibit gluconeogenesis (Ghosh Dastidar et al., 2018) were lower in the liver of Tst−/− mice. Further, activation of NRF2, which represses gluconeogenesis (Slocum et al., 2016) appears to be lower in the liver of Tst−/− mice. Involvement of NRF2 in the Tst–/– liver phenotype is further supported by the phenotype of Nrf2−/− mice that similarly exhibited steatohepatitis in the absence of insulin resistance (Meakin et al., 2014). However, NRF2 signaling can be complex and dependent on dietary context; Nrf2−/− mice showed improved glucose tolerance after HFD feeding (Zhang et al., 2012), suggesting that any contribution of a NRF2 signaling deficit in the liver of the Tst−/− mice changes upon HFD feeding. Beyond altered pyruvate flux, we also showed that hepatocytes of Tst−/− mice exhibited defective lipid metabolism. Specifically, medium-chain fatty acid (MCFA) oxidation was impaired, associated with selective reduction of the protein and persulfidation levels of lipid catabolic enzymes. This represents a mechanism linking altered sulfide metabolism to lipid oxidation, hepatic lipid accumulation, and dyslipidemia. Consistent with impaired MCFA oxidation defects as one driver of the phenotype, steatosis is observed in medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (Mcad) −/− mice (Tolwani et al., 2005), and dyslipidemia is found in MCADD-deficient humans (Onkenhout et al., 1995). The data we present add to a growing understanding of the link between sulfide regulating genes and nutrient metabolism that has so far focused on the enzymes of sulfide production. Specifically, we provide support for the importance of the sulfide oxidizing pathway as a regulator of cellular sulfide exposure. Unexpectedly, the data reveal cellular mechanisms that are engaged to homeostatically regulate sulfide disposal and can affect cell energetics and nutrient metabolism.
Our findings may have implications for potentially unexpected side effects of sulfide donor therapeutic agents. In normal mice, in vivo sulfide administration for 4 weeks after HFD feeding partially reversed hepatic lipid accumulation invoked by chronic (16 weeks) HFD feeding (Wu et al., 2015). No evidence was provided regarding whether sulfide disposal mechanisms were altered (Wu et al., 2015). This efficacious subchronic sulfide administration regimen contrasts with our genetic model of chronic sulfide elevation as a driver of dysregulated metabolism and NAFLD. Clearly, the normal mice in the Na2S administration studies had a fully functional SOP, suggesting that the presence of TST is required to achieve the beneficial metabolic effects of Na2S administration. This is also consistent with the apparently low sulfide signaling status (evidenced by lower persulfidation and NRF2 target protein abundance) in the liver of the Tst−/− mice. The benefits of elevated sulfide cannot be realized, perhaps because a major mediator of those effects is missing, and the alternate mechanisms invoked do not fully compensate (e.g., MPST) or actively drive aberrant nutrient metabolism. Comparable studies of glucose and lipid metabolism after manipulation of other sulfide-regulating genes are limited. However, in a contrasting model of reduced sulfide production (Cth−/− mice), plasma triglycerides were lowered (Mani et al., 2013), opposite to what we observed with Tst−/− mice. The hepatic sulfide disposal status of the Cth−/− mouse model is unknown, but our findings predict suppression of the SOP to spare the limited endogenous sulfide produced. Intriguingly, they also predict a knockon effect on nutrient homeostasis because of reduced metabolic demand of the TST/SOP axis. A more direct model informing on the effects of impairment of the sulfide disposal pathway is deficiency of the key mitochondrial SOP enzyme ETHE1. Ethe1−/− mice suffer fatal sulfide toxicity (Tiranti et al., 2009); therefore, comparable metabolic studies are lacking. However, one notable observation is that Ethe1−/− mice have apparently 10-fold higher liver sulfide exposure than control mice (Tiranti et al., 2009), in contrast to the normalized hepatic sulfide levels of Tst−/− mice. Circulating sulfide levels were not reported for comparison, but the presumably relatively lower systemic sulfide levels of Tst−/− mice appear to have permitted an effective homeostatic sulfide disposal response in the liver to avoid toxicity, albeit with a metabolic cost. Consequently, the liver of Tst−/− mice has a functional and proteomics profile distinct from that of Ethe1−/− mice. For example, in the liver of Tst−/− and Ethe1−/− mice (Hildebrandt et al., 2013), proteins of the GST Mu type (GSTM) and peroxiredoxin (PRDX) families were altered, but sometimes in the opposite direction or with alteration of distinct protein subclasses. A notable difference is also observed in amino acid metabolism. The liver of Ethe1−/− mice exhibits increased expression of enzymes of branched-chain amino acid metabolism (Hildebrandt et al., 2013), distinct from the predominantly GSH-related amino acid pathways that are increased in the liver of Tst−/− mice. Beyond sulfide, TST may also have distinct cellular roles that affect metabolism, such as mitoribosomal synthesis, ROS attenuation, and modulation of mitochondrial iron-sulfur clusters (Bonomi et al., 1977; Pagani and Galante, 1983; Nandi and Westley, 1998; Nandi et al., 2000; Smirnov et al., 2010).
Given the pro-diabetogenic liver phenotype in Tst−/− mice, its was surprising that insulin signaling in the liver appeared normal and peripheral insulin sensitivity was increased. There are precedents for increased hepatic glucose production independent of insulin resistance, as found in the Nrf2−/− mice (Meakin et al., 2014) and as driven by the transcription factor carbohydrate-response element-binding protein (ChREBP) (Uyeda and Repa, 2006; Kim et al., 2016). There is also evidence to support insulin-sensitizing effects of sulfide administration in vivo in mice and rats (Feng et al., 2009; Geng et al., 2013; Xue et al., 2013), consistent with sulfide-mediated insulin sensitization of non-hepatic tissues in Tst−/− mice. Higher circulating GSH in Tst−/− mice may also promote peripheral insulin sensitization (Jain et al., 2014; Lutchmansingh et al., 2018). Clearly, the net balance of glucose production from the liver and its peripheral disposal remain abnormal in Tst−/− mice. Indeed, the baseline metabolic phenotype of Tst−/− mice resembles in many ways that of a normal mouse fed a HFD, and we showed some overlapping pro-diabetogenic signatures between the liver proteome of Tst−/− mice and that of HFD-fed C57BL/6J mice. However, we also found distinct lipid metabolism and peroxisomal protein changes in Tst−/− mice. Unlike a HFD state, which is associated with dominant hepatic insulin resistance, the increased hepatic glucose production in ND-fed Tst−/− mice occurs despite normal hepatic insulin sensitivity. The significant changes in persulfidation of transaminase and gluconeogenesis proteins suggest that coordinated cross-talk across metabolic pathways underlies this atypical metabolic phenotype.
Sulfide donor therapeutic agents have been proposed as a clinical strategy for improving cardiovascular health (Szabó et al., 2011; Whiteman et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2018). Elevated endogenous sulfide has also been implicated in the beneficial metabolic effects of caloric restriction (Miller et al., 2005; Hine et al., 2015, 2017, 2018; Shimokawa et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2016). Our results suggest that chronic sulfide elevation may have unintended detrimental consequences, driving liver glucose production and fat accumulation to undesirable levels. Fortunately, this may be limited to cases where SOP proteins are compromised through rare genetic effects, such as TST variants (Billaut-Laden et al., 2006; Libiad et al., 2015). More broadly, a number of drugs or supplements are known to increase cyanide, which may dominantly inhibit TST activity and result in secondary sulfide overexposure. These include nitroprusside (Morris et al., 2017) and amygdalin (Bromley et al., 2005; O’Brien et al., 2005). Indeed, the TST metabolite thiosulfate is commonly co-administered with nitroprusside to prevent cyanide toxicity (Curry et al., 1997). Furthermore, dietary and environmental exposure to cyanogenic compounds (Simeonova et al., 2004), e.g., smoking (Vinnakota et al., 2012) or cyanogenic diets (Kashala-Abotnes et al., 2019), may interfere with normal TST function and could lead to increased sensitivity to sulfide therapeutic agents. In contrast, we have shown that administration of the TST substrate thiosulfate can ameliorate diabetes (Morton et al., 2016), further underlining the potential utility of targeting the SOP in metabolic disease. As with all therapeutic strategies, a careful cost-benefit analysis is required. A comparable case of relevance are the statins, one of the most potent and widely used drugs to prevent atherosclerosis, which also carry a higher risk for diabetes (Swerdlow et al., 2015). The full effect of TST manipulation on opposing metabolic pathways requires further study. Our current study sheds light on the underlying hepatic mechanisms invoked for sulfide disposal that are relevant to current sulfide donor strategies and may inform on routes to reduce their potential metabolic side effects.
Limitations of the study
Although the liver is the site of most (∼60%) post-absorptive gluconeogenesis in normal animals within physiological fasting ranges, renal/small intestinal gluconeogenesis begins to substantially contribute to circulating glucose with prolonged fasting/starvation (Sasaki et al., 2017; Mutel et al., 2011; Mithieux et al., 2003; Stumvoll 1998; Owen et al., 1969). We cannot rule out a role of renal or intestinal gluconeogenesis in the diabetogenic phenotype of Tst−/− mice. This will be an important area of future work, although liver TST is at least more than 3-fold that of the kidneys, and small intestinal TST is very low (BioGPS; Figure S1A).
STAR★Methods
Key resources table
REAGENT or RESOURCE | SOURCE | IDENTIFIER |
---|---|---|
Antibodies | ||
Anti-TST | GeneTex | GTX114858; RRID:AB_10620797 |
Anti-MPST | Abcam | ab224043 |
Anti-GOT1 | Abcam | ab170950; RRID:AB_170950 |
Anti-GSTT1 | Proteintech | 15838-1-AP; RRID:AB_2116344 |
Anti-MAT1A | Abcam | ab129176; RRID:AB_11145300 |
Anti-BHMT | Proteintech | 15965-1-AP; RRID:AB_2290472 |
Anti-CSAD | Abcam | ab91016; RRID:AB_10713222 |
Anti-PPCS | Atlas Antibodies | HPA031361; RRID:AB_10602150 |
IRDye 800CW Goat anti-Rabbit | Li-Cor | 926-32211; RRID:AB_621843 |
IRDye 680RD Donkey anti-Mouse | Li-Cor | 926-68072; RRID:AB_10953628 |
Anti-B-Actin | Abcam | ab8226; RRID:AB_306371 |
Anti-CoxIV | Abcam | Ab16056; RRID:AB_443304 |
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins | ||
sodium pyruvate 13C3 | Sigma-Aldrich | 490717 |
Amyloglucosidase | Roche | ROAMYGLL |
Antimycin A | Sigma-Aldrich | A8674 |
B-glycerophosphate | Sigma-Aldrich | G9422 |
B-mercaptoethanol | Sigma-Aldrich | 444203 |
Bovine serum albumin, essentially fatty acid free | Sigma-Aldrich | 10775835001 |
Carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP) | Cayman Chemicals | 15218 |
Oligomycin A | Cayman Chemicals | 11342 |
DL-Carnitine hydrochloride | Sigma-Aldrich | C9500 |
Collagenase type 1 | Worthington Laboratories | LS004194 |
cOmplete, Mini, EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail | Roche | 11836153001 |
Glucose, D-[3-3H] | PerkinElmer | NET331C |
Deoxycholic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | D2510 |
2′-deoxyguanosine 5′-diphosphate, sodium salt | Sigma-Aldrich | D9250 |
Dithiothreitol | Sigma-Aldrich | 43816 |
Durcupan ACM | Sigma-Aldrich | 44610 |
(+)- Etomoxir sodium salt hydrate | Sigma-Aldrich | E1905 |
EZ-link Maleimide-PEG2-Biotin | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 21901BID |
Fetal Calf Serum, Brazilian Origin | SLS Life Science | HYC85 |
Prestained Protein Marker | Proteintech | PL00001 |
Glutamax | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 35050061 |
L-Glutamine | Sigma-Aldrich | G7513 |
Glycine | Sigma-Aldrich | 50046 |
Hematoxylin solution | Abcam | Ab220365 |
Iodoacetamide | Sigma-Aldrich | I1149 |
L-cysteine | Sigma-Aldrich | 30089 |
Lead citrate, tribasic trihydrate | Sigma-Aldrich | 15326 |
Malate dehydrogenase, porcine heart | Sigma-Aldrich | 442610-M |
Skim Milk Powder | Millipore | 70166 |
S-Methyl methanethiosulfonate | Sigma-Aldrich | 64306 |
MitoSOX Red Mitochondrial superoxide indicator | Thermo Fisher Scientific | M36008 |
NADH, Grade I disodium salt | Roche | 10107735001 |
Pierce NEM (N-ethylmaleimide) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 23030 |
Sodium octanoate | Sigma-Aldrich | C5038 |
Oil Red O | Sigma-Aldrich | O0625 |
Oligomycin A | Sigma-Aldrich | 75351 |
Penicillin Streptomycin | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 15140122 |
PERCOLL 8.5-9.5 | Sigma-Aldrich | P1644 |
Phosphoenol pyruvate | Roche | 10108294001 |
cOmplete protease cocktail inhibitor | Roche | 04693159001 |
Rat tail collagen 1 | Sigma-Aldrich | 08-115 |
REVERT total protein stain | LICOR | 926-11011 |
Rotenone | Sigma-Aldrich | R8875 |
Sequencing grade modified Trypsin | Promega | V5111 |
Sodium fluoride | Sigma-Aldrich | S7920 |
Sodium L-lactate | Sigma-Aldrich | 71718 |
Sodium orthovanadate | Sigma-Aldrich | 450243 |
Sodium pyrophosphate | Sigma-Aldrich | 221368 |
Sodium pyruvate | Sigma-Aldrich | P8574 |
Sodium sulfate | Sigma-Aldrich | S9627 |
Sodium thiosulfate | Sigma-Aldrich | 563188 |
Sodium sulfide | Sigma-Aldrich | 407410 |
Sulforhodamine B dye | Sigma-Aldrich | 230162 |
Taurine | Sigma-Aldrich | 86329 |
Tetrabutylammonium phosphate | Sigma-Aldrich | 86833 |
Trichloroacetic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | T6399 |
Triethylammonium bicarbonate | Sigma-Aldrich | 18597 |
Trifluoracetic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | 80457 |
Uranyl acetate | Electron Microscopy Sciences | 22400 |
Urea | Sigma-Aldrich | U5128 |
XF Seahorse Base Media (DMEM) | Agilent | 102353-100 |
14C-2-deoxyglucose | Perkin Elmer | NEC495A |
4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine propanesulfonic acid | Sigma-Aldrich | 1.15230 |
2,4-nitrofluorobenzene | Sigma-Aldrich | D1529 |
Critical commercial assays | ||
Infinity Triglyceride Assay | Thermo Fisher Scientific | TR22421 |
Infinity Cholesterol Assay | Thermo Fisher Scientific | TR13421 |
Glucose Hexokinase Assay | Abcam | Ab136957 |
iTRAQ reagent – 8PLEX | Sigma-Aldrich | 4281663 |
Deposited data | ||
Proteome | ProteomeXchange | PXD028909 |
Persulfidome | ProteomeXchange | PXD028909 |
Experimental models: Cell lines | ||
Primary hepatocytes | C57BL/6J and Tst–/– mice | n/a |
Experimental models: Organisms/strains | ||
C57BL/6J (JAX mice strain) | Charles River | Strain code: 632 |
Tst—/— C57BL/6N mouse (backcrossed for > 10 generations at University of Edinburgh) | University California (Davis) International Mouse Knockout Project | VG13928; model Tsttm1(KOMP)Vlcg |
Oligonucleotides | ||
Tst (mouse) FAM gene expression assay 4331182 | Thermo Fisher | Mm00726109_m1 |
Mpst (mouse) FAM gene expression assay 4331182 | Thermo Fisher | Mm00460389_m1 |
Gapdh (mouse) FAM gene expression assay 4331182 | Thermo Fisher | Mm99999915_g1 |
Tbp (mouse) FAM gene expression assay 4331182 | Thermo Fisher | Mm0000446973_m1 |
Software and algorithms | ||
Microsoft office | N/A | |
Graph Pad Prism v8, 9 and 10 | N/A | |
Other | ||
Amersham Hybond P blotting membranes, PVDF | Merck | GE10600021 |
Microvette CB300 K2E EDTA tubes | Sarstedt | 16.444.100 |
Ultra-0.5 centrifugal filter, 10K cut off | Millipore | UFC501096 |
Streptavidin-agarose beads | Thermo Scientific | 20347 |
Formvar coated grids | Agar Scientific | AGS138 |
Standard rodent diet | SDS | RM1 |
Cornstarch diet | Research Diets | D12383 |
58% High fat diet | Research Diets | D12331 |
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Nicholas M. Morton (nik.morton@ed.ac.uk).
Materials availability
No other new unique reagents were generated for the production of the data in this paper.
Experimental model and subject details
Experimental animals
All experiments were performed according to guidelines set out by the ethical committees of The University of Edinburgh and Physiogenex S.A.S, Prologue Biotech, Labége, FRANCE. Experiments were carried out within the framework of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (1986) of the United Kingdom Home Office or related laws from the European Union (France). In all studies, animals within genotype cohorts were randomly assigned to diet or intervention groups. All animals were maintained in standard housing with 12 hour light and 12 hour dark cycles (7 a.m. to 7 p.m.) and ad libitum access to the appropriate diet. For in vivo experiments (pyruvate tolerance test, insulin tolerance test, euglycaemic clamps), operators and animal handlers were blinded to the data, which was generated by a second individual who was blinded to the treatment regimen until the code was broken. All of the studies used male mice housed in cages of 3-6 individual littermates until intervention. The mice for this study originated from C57BL/6N Tst—/— mice (Morton et al., 2016) backcrossed onto the C57BL/6J genetic background for > 10 generations. Mice were placed onto high fat diet D12331, (58% calories from fat, Research Diets, New Brunswick, USA) from between 6-8 weeks of age, for 6-7 weeks prior to testing, and compared to mice maintained on standard low fat diets, RM1 or D12383 (low-fat high-cornstarch, Research Diets, New Brunswick, USA).
Hepatocyte preparations
Mice were killed by CO2 asphyxiation, followed by cervical dislocation. The chest cavity was opened, the portal vein was cut and the thoracic vena cava was cannulated via the right atrium. The liver was perfused with (37°C) perfusion media (140 mM NaCl, 2.6 mM KCl, 0.28 mM Na2HPO4, 5 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, 0.5 mM EGTA, pH 7.4), 6 mls/min for 10 min. The liver was then perfused with digestion media (perfusion media, without EGTA, including 5 mM CaCl2, and 100 U/ml collagenase type 1) for 5-7 min. Finally, the liver was perfused with perfusion media for a further 10 min. Cells were extruded from liver into DMEM medium (DMEM, 5.5 mM glucose, 10% FCS, 7 mM glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin antibiotics), and then passed through a 40 micron filter. Cells were spun twice and washed with medium, at 500 rpm (47 g) for 5 min. Cells were spun through a 50% Percoll pH 8.5-9.5/DMEM solution at 1000 rpm (190 g) for 15 min to remove dead cells and non hepatocytic liver cell types. Hepatocytes collected in the pellet fractions were resuspended in medium and spun twice with washing at 500 rpm (47 g) 5 minutes. Yields and viability were assessed by counting using a haemocytometer, and proportion of trypan blue exclusion respectively. Yields ranged from between 2 × 106 – 1.5 × 107 viable cells, and viability was above 85%. Unless otherwise stated, hepatocytes were seeded onto collagen coated tissue culture plastic (collagen from rat tails, Sigma), and maintained in DMEM with 5.5 mM glucose, 10% FCS, 7 mM glutamine, and antibiotics).
Method details
Pyruvate tolerance test
Blood glucose was measured from 16 hour fasted mice before (0 time) and following bolus sodium pyruvate administration (i.p. 1.5 mg/g bodyweight). Blood was collected following tail venesection at 0, 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes after injection. Glucose was measured from blood using a Glucometer (OneTouch, Lifescan, Milpitas, USA or Accu-Chek, Performa nano, Roche).
PEPCK activity assay
Activity of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase was measured from cytosol samples obtained from frozen liver. Samples were homogenized in 250 mM sucrose, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.4. and centrifuged at 4°C, 12,000 rpm (17,390 g) for 15 min. Supernatants were ultracentrifuged at 4°C, 60,000 rpm (289,000 g) for 30 min. Activity of PEPCK from cytosolic fractions was inferred in this assay from NADH extinction, linked to the conversion of phosphoenol pyruvate into oxaloacetate in the presence of carbonate, dGDP and MnCl2, and the subsequent conversion of oxaloacetate into malate by adding malate dehydrogenase. Baseline measurements at 340 nM (NADH) were taken for 20 min before adding phosphoenol pyruvate, and the reaction proper was initiated with dGDP. The reaction was then measured for a further 40 min.
13C Pyruvate metabolite tracing
After overnight culture on collagen coated 6-well tissue culture plates, hepatocytes were incubated with 1 mM 13C3 labeled pyruvate in serum free DMEM for 60 min. Metabolites were extracted by washing individual wells with ice-cold PBS and addition of cold extraction buffer (50% methanol, 30% acetonitrile, 20% water solution at −20°C or lower). Extracts were clarified and stored at −80°C until required. LC-MS was carried out using a 100 mm x 4.6 mm ZIC-pHILIC column (Merck-Millipore) using a Thermo Ultimate 3000 HPLC inline with a Q Exactive mass spectrometer. A 32 min gradient was developed over the column from 10% buffer A (20 mM ammonium carbonate), 90% buffer B (acetonitrile) to 95% buffer A, 5% buffer B. 10 μL of metabolite extract was applied to the column equilibrated in 5% buffer A, 95% buffer B. Q Exactive data were acquired with polarity switching and standard ESI source and spectrometer settings were applied (typical scan range 75-1050). Metabolites were identified based upon m/z values and retention time matching to standards.
Plasma lipid analysis
Mice were fasted with free access to water for 4 hours prior to cull by decapitation or pentobarbital euthanasia. Trunk blood (decapitation) was collected directly into Sarstedt Microvette CB 300 K2E EGTA containing plasma sample tubes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany). Venous blood from the abdominal vena cava (post euthanisation) was collected into a BD Plastipak 1 mL syringe (BD, Madrid, Spain). This was then transferred to Sarstedt EGTA containing sample tubes for centrifugation. Blood samples obtained by either method were centrifuged at 20°C and 5000 rpm (2655 g) for 5 min to obtain plasma samples. Plasma samples were analyzed for cholesterol and triglyceride content by as previously described (Peters et al., 1997). Briefly, samples were subjected to gel filtration chromatography using an integrated Alliance HPLC separations module (e2695, Waters, Milford, US) to separate lipoproteins based on size. Effluent was immediately and continuously mixed with either triglyceride (Infinity Triglyceride, Thermo Scientific, Loughborough, UK) or cholesterol (Infinity Cholesterol, Thermo Scientific, Loughborough, UK) enzymatic colormetric detection kits at the correct conditions for reaction (as specified in manufacturer’s guidance). The optical density was then recorded using a spectrophotometer at the appropriate wavelength and the signal turned into a continuous trace i.e., a lipid profile. By identification of the lipoprotein peaks (based on their time of emergence from the chromatograph) the concentration for each could be calculated.
Oil Red-O lipid analysis of liver
5 μm cryostat cut frozen sections of liver were collected onto Superfrost slides (Thermo), and rinsed with 60% isopropanol. Slides were incubated in freshly prepared staining solution (2.1 mg/ml Oil Red O in 40% isopropanol/water) for 10 – 30 min and rinsed with 60% isopropanol. Slides for representative images were counterstained for nuclei in hematoxylin (Harris) for 1 minute. For image analysis, slides were not counterstained. All slides were then rinsed in running tap water for 2 min, before mounting. Sections were captured using an AxioScan Z1 slide scanner at × 40 magnification and analysis of the proportional area of Oil Red O staining (area of stain/unit area of section) was performed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health), assessed by a blinded assessor.
Liver Glycogen measurement
Frozen liver samples (between 30-90 mg) were heated to 100°C in an Eppendorf tube with 0.3 mls of 30% KOH for 30 min with vigorous shaking at 10-min intervals. Samples were heated for a further 2-3 min after addition of 0.1 mL 1M Na2SO4 and 0.8 mL ethanol. Samples were then centrifuged at 4°C at 1011 g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was removed, and the pellet resuspended in distilled H2O before 0.1 mL 1M Na2SO4 and 0.8 mL ethanol were again added, and samples boiled at 100°C for 5 min before centrifugation. This was repeated a final time to wash the sample. The pellet was resuspended in a 10 mg/ml (∼1200 U/ml) amyloglucosidase enzyme in 0.3 M sodium acetate (pH 4.8). Samples were then incubated at 50°C for 2 hours. Quantification of samples was then performed using a standard hexokinase based glucose assay (Glucose (HK) Assay Kit, Sigma, GAHK20). The assay was performed following manufacturer’s instructions and values calculated by extrapolation from a standard curve after measuring absorbance using a plate spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices OPTImax microplate reader and software, Molecular Devices, Wokingham, UK).
Western blotting for protein abundance
Frozen liver samples (stored −80°C) from mice were homogenized in protein lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, 270 mM sucrose, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM B-glycerophosphate, 5 mM Na Pyrophosphate, 1 mM orthovanadate, 0.1% β-Mercaptoethanol, 1 tablet protease inhibitor cocktail inhibitor, pH 7.4, all Sigma Aldritch). Samples were then centrifuged at 13,200 rpm (18500 g) for 15 min at 4°C and the supernatants aliquoted and stored at −80°C. Protein samples were loaded onto 10% acrylamide/bis-acrylamide gels (30% acrylamide, Sigma Aldritch) and separated by electrophoresis. A colored molecular weight marker was also run on all gels (Full range rainbow molecular weight markers, GE Healthcare). Gels were transferred overnight using a Bio Rad wet transfer system onto Amersham Hybond – P membranes (GE Healthcare). After transfer, for normalization of specific targets to total protein, membranes were stained using the REVERT total protein stain (LICOR), according to manufacturers’ instruction. Following stain and wash, lanes of each sample were analyzed using a LI-COR Odyssey scanner (700nm channel). For blots using a house keeping protein for normalization, the total protein stain was not performed, and membranes were transferred directly to blocking. All membranes were blocked in Tris buffered saline with 0.01% tween (TBST, containing 5% skimmed milk powder (Marvel skimmed milk powder) for 1 hour and then rinsed in TBST. Blocked membranes were then incubated with the appropriate primary antibody in TBST containing 5% BSA (Sigma Aldritch) overnight at 4°C. Following three 5 min washes with TBST, secondary antibody incubation for all blots was with an appropriate green or red fluorescent antibody, incubated at room temperature for 2 hours in TBST containing 5% BSA. Membranes were washed three times in TBST then scanned using the LI-COR Odyssey scanner. Odyssey software (LI-COR Biosciences) was used to quantify band intensity. For normalization to a house keeping protein, the individual band intensity of B-actin was used for each sample. Primary antibodies used were; TST, Rabbit, GeneTex, GTX114858, MPST, Rabbit, Abcam, Ab224043, GOT1, Rabbit, Abcam, ab170950, GSTT1, Rabbit, Proteintech, 15838-1-AP, MAT1A, Rabbit, Abcam, ab129176, BHMT Rabbit, Proteintech, 15965-1-AP, CSAD, Rabbit, Abcam, ab91016, PPCS Rabbit, Atlas Antibodies, HPA031361. Secondary antibodies used were; IRDye800CW Goat anti-Rabbit, Li-Cor, 926-32211, IRDye 680RD Donkey anti-Mouse, Li-Cor, 926-68072. For normalization B-Actin, Mouse, Abcam, ab8226 was used for whole tissue, and Cox IV (mitochondrial loading control), Abcam, ab16056 was used for mitochondrial fractions.
Insulin tolerance test
Male C57BL/6J or Tst—/— mice were maintained on standard chow (RM1). Mice were fasted for 4 hours prior to injection i.p. of insulin (1 mU/g bodyweight, NovoRapid 100U/ml, Novo Nordisk). Tail venesection blood samples were taken prior to, and 15, 30, 60 and 120 minutes post injection. Blood glucose was measured from samples using a Glucometer (Accu-Check, Performa Nano, Roche). Blood glucose was plotted across time to evaluate net glucose accumulation in blood.
Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps
Male C57BL/6J or Tst—/— mice were maintained on standard diet (RM1 (E) 801492, SDS) or high fat diet for 6 weeks (58% fat, D12331, Research Diets). Prior to performing the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp an indwelling catheter was placed into the femoral vein under isoflurane anesthesia, sealed under the back skin, and glued onto the top of the skull. Clamps were performed 5-6 days after recovery from catheterization. Mice were fasted 6 hours prior to a basal blood sample was taken for glucose and insulin. Mice then received a bolus of D-[3-3H] glucose (30 μCi) and perfused with 3H-glucose (30 μCi/kg/min at 2 μl/min) for 210 min (which covers the basal phase and hyperinsulinemic clamp). At steady state (60 min after start of perfusion), 5 μl of blood was collected and glycemia measured from tail tip every 10 min over 30 min for 3H-radioactivity analysis for determination of whole body glucose turnover glycolysis and glycogen synthesis rate in the basal state. 90 min after start of perfusion, the hyperinsulinemic clamp starts by co-perfusion with insulin 8 mU/kg/min for the clamped phase over 120 min. Blood glucose was assessed every 10 minutes, and glucose infusion adjusted until steady state blood glucose (120 mg/dl ± 10 mg/dl) was achieved. 5 μl of blood was collected from, tail tip every 10 min for 3H- radioactivity analysis. At 150 min after the start of perfusion, a bolus of 14C-2-deoxyglucose (25 μCi) was perfused to evaluate tissue specific uptake. At the end of the perfusion (210 min), blood is collected from the retro-orbital sinus to measure plasma insulin and mice sacrificed by i.v. injection of pentobarbital and cervical dislocation. Tissues (Inguinal WAT, Epididymal WAT, Soleus muscle, Extensor digitorum longus muscle, Vastus lateralis muscle, Tibialis anterior muscle, Heart apex, Liver) were removed by dissection and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen (stored −80°C until measured). Tracers were used to calculate various aspects of glucose metabolism (Steele et al., 1956; Carter and Morton, 2016). Parameters measured or calculated include body weight, glucose infusion rate, whole body turnover, hepatic glucose production, whole body glycolytic rate, whole body glycogen synthesis rate, and tissue glucose utilization.
MBB derivatization of whole blood and plasma
Whole blood was taken after cull of mice, from trunk (following decapitation), or portal vein (following CO2 euthanasia). EDTA-plasma was obtained from trunk blood following decapitation and collected onto ice. Blood for plasma was centrifuged within 15 min of collection for 5 min at 5000 rpm (2655 g) at 4°C. Blood and plasma samples (15-50 μl) were derivatized with monobromobimane by addition of 200 μL of 80 mM EPPS (4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine propanesulfonic acid, 8 mM DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) pH 8.0, 50% acetonitrile, 2.3 mM monobromobimane. Reaction vials were capped tightly and vortexed for 1 minute and incubated protected from light at room temperature for 30 min. 1 mL ethyl acetate was added, the tube capped and vortexed for 1 min and incubated protected from light for 10 min. The reaction vials were centrifuged at 1800 rpm (350 g) for 7 min to separate aqueous and organic layers. The organic layer was collected from each extraction, transferred to a 1.5 mL brown glass vial and the solvent was evaporated completely under a nitrogen stream. Acetonitrile (200 μL) was added to each vial, and the solvent was again evaporated to remove any traces of ethyl acetate. Dried MBB-derivatives were stored at −20°C until analyzed.
Fluorometric quantification of MBB-sulfur species
MBB-sulfur species (sulfide, thiosulfate, reduced glutathione, and cysteine) in samples was quantified by HPLC separation and detection with a fluorescence detector. The dried MBB derivatives were re-suspended in 50 μL of Buffer A (10 mM tetrabutylammonium phosphate aqueous, 10% methanol, 45 mM acetic acid adjusted to pH 3.4). The entire sample was transferred to an HPLC autosampler vial with a 200 μL glass sample insert, and the vial was closed with a penetrable cap. 20 μL of the sample was injected onto a C8 reverse-phase column (LiChrospher 60 RP-select B 5 μm 4.0 × 125 mm LiChroCART 125-4, Merck KGaA) and a guard column (LiChroCART 10-2, Superspher 60 RP-select B cartridge) on an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC+ focused system (Thermo Scientific). MBB derivatives were eluted with a linear gradient from 10% buffer B (10 mM tetrabutylammonium phosphate in methanol, 10% water, 45 mM acetic acid) to 100% buffer B over 30 min. The eluent was analyzed by fluorescence (λex = 380 nm, λem = 480 nm).
Sulfur metabolite analysis from liver
Livers from mice were removed promptly following decapitation (within 2 min), and frozen on powdered dry ice. Frozen tissue was pulverized and derivatized with either 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene for detecting GSH or monobromobimane for detecting sulfide and thiosulfate as described previously (Mosharov et al., 2000; Vitvitsky et al., 2006, 2015).
P3 fluorescence detection of sulfide in hepatocytes
Hepatocytes were seeded in glass bottomed, collagen coated wells (0.75 cm2, 12,500 hepatocytes per well) and cultured in DMEM with 5.5 mM glucose, 10% FCS, 4 mM glutamax or 7 mM glutamine, and antibiotics overnight. P3 H2S reactive probe (Singha et al., 2015) was added to wells at 10 μM in serum free DMEM for 30 min, prior to gentle washing with Krebs phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4). Plates were measured using the TECAN fluorescence plate reader, following excitation at 375 nm and detection at 510 nm. No-cell control wells were used for subtracting from the cell containing values. Corrected fluorescence emission data was normalized to protein as estimated by sulforhodamine dye. Briefly, after the run cells were fixed with 10% trichloroacetic acid overnight at 4°C. Cells were washed 9 times with tap water, and air-dried. Cells were incubated with 200 μL of 0.4% Sulforhodamine dye/1% acetic acid for 1 hour at room temperature. Stain was removed, and washed 4 times with 1% acetic acid, and then air-dried. Stain was dissolved in 200 μL of 10 mM Tris pH 10.5 for 30 min, and 100 μL was measured by colorimetric absorbance spectroscopy at 540 nm. After subtracting a baseline absorbance from blank controls, the absorbance was used to normalize the fluorescence data from each well.
Quantification of hydrogen sulfide levels using MitoA in vivo exomarker
MitoA and MitoN were quantified in mouse blood using LC-MS/MS. Mice received a tail vein IV injection of 50 nM MitoA in 0.9% saline (100 μL). MitoA was given 1.5 hr to distribute into mitochondria. Mice were culled by decapitation 90 minutes after administration. Liver was excised and flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. MitoA and MitoN were extracted from tissue by homogenization of liver (50 mg) enriched with 5 pg d15-MitoN (95% ACN, 210 μL) which was used as an internal standard (IS). Homogenates were centrifuged (16,000 g, 10 min, RT) and the supernatant was transferred to a clean tube and stored on ice. The pellet was re-extracted (95% CAN, 210 μL), spun down again (16,000 g, 10 min, rT) and the supernatants were combined and incubated at 4°C for 30 mins. Calibration standards comprise MitoA and MitoN standards ranging from 0.01 to 10 pg in 500 μL 95% ACN. 500 μL of the supernatants and calibration standards were loaded onto an ISOLUTE PLD+ protein and phospholipid removal plate (Biotage, Sweden). Samples and standards were pulled through the plate under vacuum into a 2 mL deep-well 96-well plate. Wells were dried completely at 40°C under N2 and resuspended in 100 uL 20% ACN, 0.1% FA. The plate was shaken at (250 rpm, 20 min) to ensure reconstitution. Liquid chromatography-Mass Spectrometry was performed on an I-class Acquity LC system-Xevo TQS triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters, Warrington, UK). Samples were kept at 10°C and injected onto an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column fitted with a 0.2 μm filter (1 × 50 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters). Chromatographic separation of MitoA and MitoN was achieved using mobile phase A composition: water:ACN, (95:5, 0.1% FA), mobile phase B: ACN:water (90:10, 0.1% FA). LC mobile phases were infused at 200 μL/min using the gradient: 0– 0.3 min, 5% B; 0.3–3 min, 5%–100% B; 3– 4 min, 100% B, 4.0– 4.10, 100%–5% B; 4.10– 4.60 min, 5% B. MS/MS analysis was performed under positive ion mode (Source spray voltage, 3.2 kV; cone voltage, 125 V; ion source temperature, 100°C). Curtain and collision gas were nitrogen and argon, respectively. Analytes were detected by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). MitoA undergoes neutral loss of N2 to a nitrene (precursor ion). For quantification the following transitions were used: MitoA, m/z 437.2 →183.1; MitoN, m/z 439.2 → 120.0; d15-MitoN, 454.2 → 177.1 m/z. MassLynx 4.1 software was used to integrate the peak area of the analytes MitoA, MitoN and the d15-MitoN internal standard. Response was calculated by normalizing sample peak areas to the IS peak area. By comparison of sample responses to calibration standard responses the mass of each analyte in the tissue sample was calculated. The mass of analyte was normalized to the mass of tissue homogenizer and MitoN/MitoA ratio was calculated.
Preparation of hepatic mitochondria
Fresh liver was taken from mice, and homogenized in 250 mM sucrose, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM EGTA. 0.5% fatty acid free bovine serum albumin (BSA) pH 7.4 at 4°C, with seven passes of a loose glass Dounce homogenizer (Type A). Homogenates were centrifuged in glass tubes at 2900 rpm (1000 g) for 10 min in a pre-chilled 4°C Beckman centrifuge (JA-20 Fixed angle rotor). The supernatant was then centrifuged in glass tubes at 8500 rpm (8700 g) for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was aspirated and any visible lipid was carefully removed from the sides of the tubes. The pellet was washed with 5 mL of mIR-05 buffer (0.5 mM EGTA, 3 mM MgCl2, 20 mM taurine, 10 mM KH2PO4, 20 mM HEPES, 110 mM sucrose, 1 mg/ml fatty acid free BSA, pH 7.2), and centrifuged at 8500 rpm (8700 g) for 10 min at 4°C. After aspiration and removal of visible lipid, the pellet was suspended in 1ml of mIR-05 buffer and kept on ice until used. All measurements were taken within two hours of preparation. Protein concentration was determined using the DC-Protein Assay (BioRad) as per manufacturers instruction.
Amperometric analysis of sulfide disposal
Hepatocytes were prepared as described, and kept at room temperature in DMEM with 5.5 mM glucose, 10% FCS, 4 mM glutamax or 7 mM glutamine, and antibiotics at a concentration of 4 × 106 per ml. Mitochondria were prepared as described, and maintained on ice in mIR-05 buffer until use. All samples were analyzed within 4 hours of preparation. Sulfide (H2S(g)) was measured (with and without samples) in a 2ml volume plastic chamber, to which an amperometric sensor was inserted, sealed with a rubber O-ring. Voltage measurements from the sensor (linear relationship to H2S(g) concentration) were recorded using a TBR4100 Gas radical analyzer (World Precision Instruments). A gas permeable membrane covered the sensor, and the outer glass sensor compartment was filled with H2S detection fluid (World Precision Instruments). All measurements of H2S(g) from standards and samples were recorded as voltage by the amperometric sensor at ambient temperature. Mitochondrial measurements (and standards) were taken in serum free mIR-05 buffer. Hepatocyte measurements (and standards) were taken in serum-free, bicarbonate-free DMEM, buffered with 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), with 5 mM glucose, 2 mM glutamax and 2 mM pyruvate. Sulfide was added to buffer in the form of Na2S, predicted to equilibriate according to its Pka at this pH to about 1/3 of sulfide as H2S(g) 2/3 as HS-. The probes selectivity to H2S(g) (versus HS-) was confirmed with standards by demonstrating predicted signal amplification to a maximum following acidification of media to pH < 5 (approx. 100% H2S(g)/0% HS-), and signal compression to a minimum following alkalinisation of standard to pH > 10 (Approx 0% H2S(g)/100% HS-/S2-). A final re-acidification recovered the signal to near maximal levels. Standard curves for calculating experimental measurements were prepared using freshly made Na2S solutions ranging from 0.25 – 20 μM (corresponding to approximately 170 nm – 6.7 μM H2S(g)). H2S(g) disposal was measured by recording the extrapolated H2S(g) concentration after 10 min incubation with samples. A baseline without sample was taken for 5 min, and then after sample addition (400,000 hepatocytes, or 1.6 – 2.0 mg of mitochondrial prep), another 5 min baseline with sample was taken. In all experiments, no detectable increase in signal (limit of detection 0.25 μM Na2S) was observed during incubation of hepatocyte or mitochondrial samples from either genotype. Following addition of 10 μM Na2S the (voltage) signal was recorded over a period of 10 min. Disposal rates were calculated after subtraction of a baseline disposal rate in media alone, over a 10 min period, performed each day of experimentation. Sample disposal rates were in the range of 5-20 higher than baseline disposal rate confirming good signal to noise. To determine the rate of disposal that is dependent upon respiration, a fresh aliquot of the same sample was prepared as before, but 5 min after addition of sample to chamber, Antimycin A (2.5 μM, dose titrated) was added. After a further 5 minutes, 10 μM Na2S was added and a disposal rate (after subtraction to sample free baseline rate) was again calculated. The respiratory (Antimycin sensitive/complex III dependent) sulfide disposal rate of samples was calculated as the difference between the nieve sample rate and the Antimycin inhibited rate. After each measurement, the sample was removed, and centrifuged to collect cells or mitochondria for a final protein assessment (DC-Protein Assay, Bio-Rad) for the purposes of normalization.
Mitochondrial ROS (MitoSOX) measurement in H2O2 treated hepatocytes
Hepatocytes were seeded overnight onto 96-well collagen coated plates. Cells were exposed to a range of concentrations of H2O2 (0.125 - 8 μM) for 2 hours. Following 3 washes with PBS, cells were incubated with MitoSOX Red mitochondrial superoxide indicator (Thermo Fisher) for 10 mins prior to three further washes. Measurement of fluorescence was carried out in a fluorescence detector plate reader (TECAN), using 510 nm for excitation and 580 nm for emission detection. Data from each well was normalized to sulfurhodamine dye protein stain.
Persulfidation Mass Spec and GO term analysis
Livers from mice were removed promptly following decapitation (within 2 min), and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. The persulfide proteome analysis using the BTA method was conducted as described previously (Gao et al., 2015). Briefly, 100-150 mg of frozen liver tissue was pulverized and lysed on ice in RIPA buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 25 mM deoxycholic acid, 2 tablets/ 100 mL of cOmplete, Mini, EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche)). The lysates were centrifuged at 14,000 g for 10 min at 4°C and protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford reagent (BioRad). Supernatant containing 6 mg of protein was incubated with 100 μM NEM-biotin (Pierce) for 60 min at room temperature after which the proteins were precipitated with cold acetone (1:4 v/v) for 1 h at −20°C, followed by a centrifugation at 14,000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The precipitated protein was re-suspended in a denaturing buffer containing 7 M urea, 1% SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris, pH 7.5. Then, the samples were diluted 10-fold with trypsin reaction buffer (1 mM CaCl2, 100 mM Tris pH 7.5) and incubated overnight with sequencing grade modified trypsin (1:50 trypsin:protein) (Promega) at 30°C. The digestion products were mixed with streptavidin-agarose beads (ThermoScientific) and incubated at 4° overnight, followed by ten washes with the wash buffer (0.1% SDS, 100 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 600 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100). The streptavidin-agarose bound peptides were incubated with elution buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 30 mM DTT) for 1 hr at room temperature. Persulfidated peptides were eluted by centrifugation and derivatized with 40 mM iodoacetamide for 2 hr at room temperature in the dark. The samples were then passed through a desalting column (Pierce). LC-MS/MS analysis was carried out using an LTQ-Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo-Fisher) coupled to an Ultimate 3000 high-performance liquid chromatography system. The alkylated peptides were loaded onto a 75 μm desalting column, C18 reverse phase resin (Dionex), and eluted onto a Dionex 15 cm x 75 μm id Acclaim Pepmap C18, 2 μm, 100 Å reverse-phase chromatography column using a gradient of 2%–80% buffer B (5% water, 95% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid) in buffer A (0.1% formic acid). The peptides were eluted onto the mass spectrometer at a flow rate of 300 nl/min and the spray voltage was set to 1.9 kV.
GO enrichment analysis
In order to identify differentially persulfidated proteins between the C57BL/6J and Tst—/— samples, we compared the abundances of persulfidated fragments in appropriately treated mass spectrometry datasets to the estimated overall abundance of the corresponding parent proteins in standard label-free quantitation experiments. For each observed persulfidated fragment in each experimental replicate, we calculated the persulfidation rate as the log2 ratio of the count of that persulfidated fragment to the median count of that fragment across all experimental replicates. The observed counts for the Tst—/— replicates were additionally scaled (prior to log transformation) by the ratio of abundances of the parent protein between the C57BL/6J and Tst—/— cells to normalize for differential protein abundance across conditions. For each peptide we then assigned an approximate average log2 fold change in persulfidation rate between the C57BL/6J and Tst—/— conditions. If a persulfidated peptide was identified in at least two biological replicates of one condition and none in the other, we assigned a log2 fold change of ± 5.0 as placeholder values indicating a high confidence change; peptides with only one observation in one condition and none in the other were omitted from our analysis. Having thus obtained estimates for the magnitude of changes in persulfidation rate of each detectable peptide, we then performed gene ontology term enrichment analysis using the estimated log2 fold changes. We consolidated the peptide-level data to protein-level data by taking the largest magnitude change in persulfidation levels across all peptides from a given protein, and then used the iPAGE program [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.016] to identify GO terms with significant mutual information with the profile of persulfidation rates. Arguments to iPAGE were “—max_p=0.1 –minr=0.3 –ebins=9 –exptype=continuous,” indicated that the data were discretized into nine equally populated bins prior to analysis, and that default hypergeometric p value and information content thresholds were relaxed to maximize sensitivity.
Focused analysis of persulfidation in gluconeogenesis proteins
The gluconeogenesis pathway was selected for a focused analysis of the persulfidation rate of all cysteine sites detected in the mass spectrometry data as described above. All peptides from proteins present in the persulfidation dataset used for GO enrichment analysis, that are defined by the GO term gluconeogenesis (GO 0006094) were included, these were Pgk1, Gpi1, Fbp1 and Tpi1 (22 peptides). The log2 rate ratio of persulfidation (Tst—/— /6J) of all of these 22 peptides was compared first to the entire mass spectrometry dataset for log2 rate ratio of persulfidation (1245 peptides after removal of ambiguous peptides, peptides with a P-diff of 0, and the 22 gluconeogenesis peptides). A Mann-Whitney non parametric t test was used to detect significance. A second analysis was performed with the gluconeogenesis pathway. For this analysis, all log2 rate ratio’s were given a positive sign to indicate the magnitude of change in the Tst—/— relative to 6J, independent to the direction of change. A Mann-Whitney non parametric t test was then performed to determine if the magnitude of change in persulfidation in the gluconeogenesis pathway was significantly higher than that of the overall the dataset.
Persulfidation labeling and western blotting from frozen liver
80-120 mg of frozen liver samples were homogenized on ice using a 2 mL glass Dounce homogenizer (Kimble), in 500 μl buffer (7 M urea, 100 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1% deoxycholic acid; supplemented with cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche)). Initial disruption of tissue was achieved with three passes, using the loose (Type A) pestle, and after 5 min incubation on ice; complete homogenization was achieved with 9 passes using the tight fit (Type B) pestle. Homogenates were centrifuged at 5000 rpm (2655 g) for 5 min at 4°C. Protein concentrations of supernatants were determined using the DC BCA protein assay (Bio-Rad). Protein (6 mg) from each sample, was made up to 1 mL with phosphate buffered saline (pH 8.0). Freshly prepared EZ-link Maleimide PEG Biotin EZ-linker (Thermo Fisher 21902BID), was added to samples to 100 μM, and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with gentle mixing. Excess maleimide linker was removed from samples by acetone precipitation (3 volumes) at −20°C for 1 h, followed by centrifugation at 12000 rpm (17390 g) for 10 min at 4°C. Protein pellets were washed with ice-cold acetone and then dissolved in 250 μl of 50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% SDS. To each sample, 750 μl of RIPA buffer (100 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1% deoxycholic acid) was then added. An aliquot (20 μl) was taken from each sample for estimation of total input protein for normalization (described below). The remainder of the samples were split into duplicates and incubated with gentle mixing, overnight at 4°C with 320 μl of pre-washed streptavidin agarose beads (Thermo Fisher 20347). Beads were washed 10 times with 0.8 mL washing buffer (30 mM Tris pH 7.5, 600 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS), followed by one wash with phosphate buffered saline (pH 7.4). Beads were then centrifuged for 1 min at 1000 rpm (106 g) to dry. Elution of the duplicate samples for western blot analysis was performed by adding 300 μl of elution buffer (30 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl). For each sample pair, one duplicate was eluted in buffer supplemented with 10 mM DTT and the other without DTT. The beads were incubated with the elution buffer for 1 hour at RT; and centrifuged for 1 min at 1000 rpm (106 g) to collect the eluate. Each eluted sample was concentrated to 20 ul using an Ultra-0.5 Centrifugal Filter Device, 10 K cut-off (Amicon), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Eluted samples, and input protein samples were loaded in their entirety onto SDS-PAGE gels and transferred overnight at 4°C by western blotting onto PVDF membrane. Total protein from each lane on the membrane was estimated after staining with REVERT total protein stain (LICOR) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, following overnight transfer and after rinsing the blot with water, the membranes were incubated with REVERT total protein stain for 5 min, and rinsed twice with wash solution. Blots were then imaged in the 700 nm channel with an Odyssey imaging system (LICOR). Each lane was measured for its total integrated fluorescence intensity to obtain an estimate of the total protein in each lane. Measurements from no-DTT eluted sample lanes were subtracted from DTT eluted sample lanes. Similar fluorescence measurements of input total protein lanes were used to normalize the eluted sample measurements, and this was used as a measure of relative protein-persulfidation rate.
Mass spec analysis of liver protein
Sample preparation; Tst—/— and wild-type (C57BL/6J) mouse strains were fed either high-fat (58% fat) or normal (low fat) diet. Livers from mice were removed following decapitation, and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Four biological replicates from the 4 conditions were used to isolated proteins and performed protein quantitation using iTRAQ 8plex. Liver tissue was homogenized using 1 mL of 8 M urea with HEPES buffer pH 8.0. The protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad RC DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). One hundred micro grams of protein from each of the samples were reduced with THP (Tris(hydroxypropyl)phosphine), alkylated with MMTS (methyl methanethiosulfonate) in 500 mM triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB, pH 8.5), trypsin digested and subsequently label with iTRAQ 8plex accordingly to the manufacturer’s instructions. Electrostatic Repulsion-Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography (ERLIC) Peptide fractionation; Peptide fractionation was performed using a pH gradient. Labeled peptides were dissolved in 100 μL of buffer A (100 mM formic acid, 25% acetonitrile, pH 3.0), followed by fractionation in a 2.6 × 200 mm, 5 μm, 200 Å PolySulfethyl A column (Poly LC Inc., Columbia, MD), using an Ultimate 3000 UHPLC+ focused (Thermo-Fisher Scientific) system, operating at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. Twenty minutes of isocratic buffer A were followed by a linear gradient from 0% to 100% buffer B (100 mM ammonium formate, 25% acetonitrile, pH 6.0) over 20 min and then a final linear gradient from 0% to 100% buffer C (600 mM ammonium acetate, 25% acetonitrile, pH 6.0) over 10 min. A total of 22 fractions (1-min intervals) were collected. All fractions were lyophilized and stored at −20°C. Nanoflow Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry; NanoLC MS/MS analysis was performed using an on-line system consisting of a nano-pump UltiMate 3000 UHPLC binary HPLC system (Dionex, ThermoFisher) coupled with Q-Exactive mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher, San Jose, CA. iTRAQ-labeled peptides were resuspended in 2% ACN, 0.1% formic acid (20 μL) and 6 μL injected into a pre-column 300 μm × 5 mm (Acclaim PepMap, 5 μm particle size). After loading, peptides were eluted to a capillary column 75 μm × 50 cm (Acclaim Pepmap, 3 μm particle size). Peptides were eluted into the MS, at a flow rate of 300 nL/min, using a 90 min gradient from 0% to 35% mobile phase B. Mobile phase A was 2.5% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid in H2O and mobile phase B was 90% acetonitrile with 0.025% trifluoroacetic acid and 0.1% formic acid. The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent mode, with a single MS scan in the orbitrap (400-2000 m/z at 70 000 resolution at 200 m/z in profile mode); automatic gain control (AGC) was set to accumulate 4 × 105 ions, with a maximum injection time of 50 ms. MS/MS scans were performed in the orbitrap at 17 500 resolution. Ions selected for MS/MS scan were fragmented using higher energy collision dissociation (HCD) at normalized collision energy of 38% with an isolation window of 0.7 m/z. MS2 spectra were acquired with a fixed first m/z of 100. The intensity threshold for fragmentation was set to 50 000 and included charge states 2+ to 7+. A dynamic exclusion of 60 s was applied with a mass tolerance of 10 ppm. Data Analysis; Raw files were converted to MGF files and searched against the mouse UniProt database (81033 sequences, released on March 2014) using MASCOT Version 2.4 (Matrix Science Ltd, UK). Search parameters were peptide mass tolerance of 10 ppm, and MS/MS tolerance of 0.05 amu allowing 2 missed cleavage. iTRAQ8plex (N-term) and iTRAQ8plex (K) were set as fixed modification, and acetyl (Protein N-term), Methylthio (C) and Oxidation (M) were allowed as variable modification. Peptide assignments with ion score cut-off of 20 and a significance threshold of ρ < 0.05 were exported to Excel for further analysis. Data are available from the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD028909.
GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of proteome data
The data generated from the initial mass spectrometric analysis of iTRAQ labeled peptides from the 16 liver samples was analyzed by FIOS. A total of 16 samples were QC analyzed using the arrayQualityMetrics Bioconductor package to identify sub-standard and/or outlier samples. No samples were identified as outliers. All samples passed the manual and automated quality control based on three metrics (MAplot, Boxplot and Heatmap). The exploratory analysis using PCA showed that the samples clustered perfectly into four groups based on the factor Group (representing four genotype-diet combinations). The first PC captures the main source of variation in the dataset and is showing a separation of the samples based on diet, where high-fat diet and control diet samples separate. The second PC shows a separation between genotypes (Tst KO and WT). The hierarchical clustering and PCA plot both show a clear separation based on the iTRAQ labels. This is expected as the iTRAQ labels are confounded with the Groups. While the observed separation of the samples into groups is most likely due to the underlying biological differences, any technical variations (potentially introduced during the wet lab processing) could be masked. The log2 ratio data were subsequently normalized within arrays using loess, followed by normalization between samples using the Gquantile method. A total of 4 single and/or multi-factor comparisons, using statistical approaches, were performed. The contrast “Tst KO vs WT mice (High-fat diet)” was analyzed at a cut-off (unadjusted) p value < 0.01. Due to the known bias in fold-change magnitudes of the iTRAQ technology, no fold-change cut-off was applied to the significant differentially abundant proteins. With this threshold 551 proteins were differentially abundant in at least one of the comparisons. The contrast “High-fat diet vs Control diet (WT)” had the most DAPs (432) while the contrast ” Tst—/— versus 6J mice (High-fat diet)” had the least DAPs (83). Noticeably, the TST protein showed the strongest downregulation for both of the contrasts comparing Tst—/— to 6J mice, consistent with gene deficiency and the fold change compression effect of iTRAQ. The full dataset (4,322 identified proteins) was filtered to remove proteins having less than two detected peptides (on average across all 16 samples); leaving 1,654 proteins for downstream analysis. Exploratory analysis using principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the dataset separated into four distinct groups based on the genotype-diet combinations along the two first principal components (PCs). These 1,654 proteins were used for enrichment analysis for GO terms and KEGG pathways. Individual proteins were considered of interest if they were found significantly different (p < 0.01) between selected pairwise comparisons. The four comparisons were Tst—/— normal diet versus C57BL/6J normal diet, C57BL/6J high fat diet versus C57BL/6J normal diet, Tst—/— high fat diet versus Tst—/— normal diet, and Tst—/— high fat diet versus C57B/6J high fat diet. Normalized mean abundance of proteins was expressed as Log2 fold change ratios for each comparison.
Transcription factor enrichment analysis
43 upregulated proteins were selected for analysis of their promoter sequences (selected on basis of P value < 0.05; adjusted for comparison of diet and genotype). 67 control proteins were selected from the proteome data on the basis of their equivalence of abundance between C57BL/6J and Tst—/—. We used a QIAGEN hosted/SABiosciences mouse database of promoter located transcription factor binding sites. 34 transcription factors were chosen to analyze, based on either their a-priori prevalence in the promoter of Tst—/— upregulated proteins (present in the promoters of more than 50% of the upregulated proteins) or on their links to either sulfide or nutrient metabolism. The proportion of genes containing a TFBS was calculated for the upregulated set (43) and the control set (67). The ratio of upregulated to control was then calculated. The number of genes with and without the presence of the TFBS were analyzed for establishing statistical difference (Upregulated versus Control), using a Fisher Exact test (p < 0.05).
NRF2 target identification and proteome analysis
NRF2 target genes of the mouse liver were compiled from the following reviews (Cuadrado et al., 2019; Tonelli et al., 2018; Rooney et al., 2018; Walsh et al., 2014). 106 genes were identified as target genes (upregulated at mRNA or protein level following NRF2 activation). 47 of these target genes were represented in our liver proteome, and each protein was checked for relative expression between Tst—/— and 6J (on normal diet, threshold of p < 0.01). 10 of the 47 target genes were lower in abundance in the Tst—/— proteome, 37 unchanged, with none upregulated. To analyze whether this was statistically significant, we compared this to the percentage of proteins upregulated, downregulated or unchanged in the proteome database. 5.86% of proteins were upregulated, 5.62% downregulated, and 88.6% unchanged in the full database (1654 proteins total). Expected (mean) numbers of proteins from a hypothetical set of 47 proteins, predict rounded values of 3 upregulated, 3 downregulated and 42 unchanged. We used these as a reference to the actual data for NRF2 target proteins; 0 upregulated, 10 downregulated and 37 unchanged. A Freeman-Halton Fisher Exact test was used for analysis of significance, and a significant difference between predicted and actual distribution was found (PA = 0.039, PB = 0.047).
Electron micrograph imaging
Liver tissue for transmission electron microscopy was prepared following immersion fixation in 0.1 M PB buffer (pH 7.4, EM-grade) containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde. 1mm tissue blocks were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M PB for 45 min before dehydration through an ascending series of ethanol solutions and propylene oxide. Tissue blocks were then embedded in Durcupan before ultrathin sections (∼60/70 nm) were cut and collected on formvar-coated grids (Agar Scientific, UK), stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate in an LKB Ultrostainer and then quantitatively assessed in a Philips CM12 transmission electron microscope (TEM).
Seahorse respiratory analysis
Primary hepatocytes (C57BL/6J and Tst—/— mice) were seeded immediately following purification onto collagen coated V7 Seahorse 24-well cell culture microplates (Agilent Technologies), in 200 μL medium (DMEM, 5.5 mM glucose, 10% FCS, 7 mM glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin antibiotics), for culture in a 5% CO2 37°C incubator. Experiments were performed between 22-28 hours following collection from mice. Optimization experiments determined the optimal seeding density, which was then standardized at 10,000/well. Optimization for drugs and compounds used in Seahorse experiments were performed separately with hepatocytes for each genotype and dietary regime (normal or 58% high fat). This established the doses of drugs for respiratory manipulation, which were the same for both genotypes and diets; oligomycin (2 μM), FCCP (0.5 μM), and antimycin/rotenone (1 μM/0.2 μM). In all experiments, overnight media from cells was replaced, after two washes (0.75 ml), with 525 μL of run media and incubated for 30 mins at 37°C (without CO2), prior to entry into the Seahorse XFe24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Agilent). The analyzer was operated using Wave software (Agilent), and all oxygen consumption rate (OCR) data was normalized to protein using the Sulforhodamine B stain (described above). Data from each biological replicate was averaged from between 4-10 replicate wells, to produce a single value at each measurement time for each biological replicate. Respiratory parameters were calculated as described below for each biological replicate, and this data was used for statistical analysis of genotype effects.
Mitochondrial stress test (MST)
Run media for the MST was Seahorse assay media (Agilent), supplemented with 10 mM glucose, 2 mM sodium pyruvate, pH 7.35 ± 0.5 at 37°C). Most measurements were made using 3 min mixing, 2 min wait, 3 min measure. Measurements following addition of FCCP to hepatocytes from high fat fed mice were measured using 4 min mix, 2 min wait, 2 min measure. Three measurements were taken basally, and three measurements taken after injection of each drug (in sequence; oligomycin for inhibiting ATP-linked respiration, FCCP for eliciting maximal uncoupled respiration, antimycin/rotenone for inhibiting the respiratory electron chain). Respiratory parameters for each biological replicate were calculated from the mean normalized OCR as follows. Basal respiration was calculated by subtracting the third OCR measurement following injection of antimycin/rotenone (12th measurement) from the third basal OCR measurement (3rd measurement). ATP linked respiration was calculated by subtracting the third OCR measurement following the injection of oligomycin (6th measurement) from the third basal OCR measurement (3rd measurement). Maximum (uncoupled) respiration was calculated by subtracting the third OCR measurement after injection of antimycin/rotenone (12th measurement) from the first measurement (peak OCR) following injection of FCCP (7th measurement). Proton leak respiration was calculated by subtracting the third OCR measurement after injection of antimycin/rotenone (12th measurement) from the third measurement following the injection of oligomycin (6th measurement). Non-respiratory OCR was taken from the third measurement after the addition of antimycin/rotenone (12th measurement).
Octanoate rescue test
To investigate lipid respiratory metabolism, hepatocytes were prepared, seeded and cultured overnight as above. Run media for the Octanoate rescue was Seahorse assay media (Agilent), supplemented with 5 mM glucose, 0.1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1 mM sodium lactate, and 0.5 mM carnitine pH 7.35 ± 0.5 at 37°C). All measurements were made using 3 min mixing, 2 min wait, 3 min measure. After washing cells into run media, and 30 min before entry into the analyzer, half of the wells from each genotype were incubated with 8 μM etomoxir (or DMSO vehicle) to block carnitine dependent import of long chain fatty acids into the mitochondria. Three basal measurements were taken prior to injection of oligomycin, two measurements were taken prior to FCCP, two measurements were taken prior to injection of sodium octanoate (250 μM), three measurements taken prior to antimycin/rotenone followed by two final measurements. Standard respiratory parameters were calculated analogous to the above description for the standard mitochondrial stress test, except using the second measurement following injection of drug when only 2 measurements were taken. Dependency upon endogenous fatty acids for supporting uncoupled respiration (Etomoxir inhibited respiration) was calculated for each biological replicate using the maximal respiration prior to the addition of octanoate. Maximal respiration was calculated as the 6th measurement (peak FCCP OCR) – 12th measurement (lowest Antimycin/Rotenone OCR). The mean maximal respiration from the etomoxir treated wells was subtracted from the mean maximal respiration of the vehicle treated wells to calculate the Etomoxir inhibited respiration (long chain fatty acid dependency) for that biological replicate. Octanoate stimulation of respiration (Octanoate stimulated respiration), was calculated for each vehicle well by subtracting the second OCR measurement after injection of FCCP (7th measurement) from the third measurement after injection of octanoate (10th measurement).
Real time for mRNA analysis
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis and real-time PCR were performed as described (Morton et al., 2011; Moreno-Navarrete et al., 2013). Probes were mouse Mpst, Mm00460389_m1, Tst, Mm00726109_m1; Gapdh (internal control), Mm99999915_g1; and Tbp (internal control), Mm0000446973_m1.
Quantification and statistical analysis
For analytes, bioenergetics, fluorescent probes, gene expression, and protein levels, generally group sizes of 6 were calculated to allow detection of differences in these variable parameters to a threshold of 15% (there is sufficient power to detect smaller differences in certain parameters with this cohort size) with a power of at least 0.8. In some studies, limitations in animal numbers, or fewer remaining samples from larger group sizes resulting from their use for multiple end-points, precluded the desired minimum of n = 6 per group. Protein or mRNA differences in validation studies with 2 parameters (e.g., diet with line or genotype) were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA for line and diet effects followed, where appropriate, by post hoc Tukey tests or Holm-Sidak multiple comparison tests using Sigmastat version 3.5 (Systat Software) or Prism (Graphpad Software). For simple 2 condition comparisons, t test was used. For simple control versus treated (including different treatments or concentration response curves) data were analyzed by 1-way ANOVA. For longitudinal measures (e.g., PTT, ITT, bodyweight gain) repeated-measures (RM) ANOVA was used and multiple comparisons determined. For all main in vivo studies, a blinding strategy was used where the operator (e.g., for injections of glucose, or administration of drug) was blind to the genotype of the subject during the experiment. Similarly, for analysis of images (e.g., oil-red O staining) the scorer was blind to genotype and the data coded, with the code broken by a second individual. Downstream analysis of e.g., tissue mRNA and protein content was not generally blinded to allow appropriate data arrangement on e.g., representative western blots. For clamp studies, mean ± standard error of mean (sem) will be presented, statistical analysis will use t test to investigate differences of genotype on each diet (2 independent experiments, normal diet, and high fat diet, are not compared directly to each other). Statistical significance and the number (n) of subjects or samples for analysis are indicated in the figure legends.
Acknowledgments
This work was funded by a Wellcome Trust New Investigator Award (100981/Z/13/Z to N.M.M.) and a Diabetes UK grant (17/0005697). R.C.H. was funded by a Medical Research Council Discovery Award (MC-PC-15076). We would like to thank Prof. Ken Olsen and Eric DeLeon (Notre Dame) for advice regarding establishing sulfide measurement by probe.
Author contributions
N.M.M. and R.N.C. conceived the experiments. R.N.C., M.T.G.G., M.E.B.-L., M.L., V.V., B.E., T.L.B., M.B., H.S., S.G.D., N.Z.M.H., C.M., A.T., N.F., and T.G., performed the experiments. R.N.C., M.E.B.-L., P.L.F., V.V., T.L.B., N.Z.M.H., T.S., F.B., T.G., R.C.H., B.S., G.A.G., A.J.F., C.S., R.B., and N.M.M. analyzed and interpreted data and commented on the manuscript. K.H.A. and S.S. generated reagents. C.M. and R.C.H. generated reagents. R.N.C. and N.M.M. wrote the manuscript.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Published: November 9, 2021
Footnotes
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109958.
Supplemental information
(A) Significant GO terms represented by proteins that are more abundant in the ND-fed Tst—/— liver compared with normal diet-fed C57BL/6J. (B) Significant GO terms represented by proteins that are less abundant in the ND-fed Tst—/— liver compared with normal diet-fed C57BL/6J. ‘Genes’ indicates the number of genes in the Tst—/— that represent the changes driving the GO term. The lists include all regulated GO terms at a significance threshold of p < 0.05
Data and code availability
-
•
Proteomics and persulfidomics root data from the iTraq and persulfidated peptide mass spectrometry experiments have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Perez-Riverol et al., 2019) partner repository with the dataset identifier ProteomeXchange: PXD028909.
-
•
This paper does not report original code.
-
•
Any additional information required to reanalyse the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.
References
- Abe K., Kimura H. The possible role of hydrogen sulfide as an endogenous neuromodulator. J. Neurosci. 1996;16:1066–1071. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-03-01066.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arndt S., Baeza-Garza C.D., Logan A., Rosa T., Wedmann R., Prime T.A., Martin J.L., Saeb-Parsy K., Krieg T., Filipovic M.R., et al. Assessment of H2S in vivo using the newly developed mitochondria-targeted mass spectrometry probe MitoA. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:7761–7773. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.784678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Banerjee R., Chiku T., Kabil O., Libiad M., Motl N., Yadav P.K. Assay methods for H2S biogenesis and catabolism enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 2015;554:189–200. doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2014.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Billaut-Laden I., Allorge D., Crunelle-Thibaut A., Rat E., Cauffiez C., Chevalier D., Houdret N., Lo-Guidice J.M., Broly F. Evidence for a functional genetic polymorphism of the human thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (Rhodanese), a cyanide and H2S detoxification enzyme. Toxicology. 2006;225:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2006.04.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonomi F., Pagani S., Cerletti P., Cannella C. Rhodanese-Mediated sulfur transfer to succinate dehydrogenase. Eur. J. Biochem. 1977;72:17–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1977.tb11219.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bromley J., Hughes B.G., Leong D.C., Buckley N.A. Life-threatening interaction between complementary medicines: cyanide toxicity following ingestion of amygdalin and vitamin C. Ann. Pharmacother. 2005;39:1566–1569. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caron S., Verrijken A., Mertens I., Samanez C.H., Mautino G., Haas J.T., Duran-Sandoval D., Prawitt J., Francque S., Vallez E., et al. Transcriptional activation of apolipoprotein CIII expression by glucose may contribute to diabetic dyslipidemia. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011;31:513–519. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.220723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carter R.N., Morton N.M. Cysteine and hydrogen sulphide in the regulation of metabolism: insights from genetics and pharmacology. J. Pathol. 2016;238:321–332. doi: 10.1002/path.4659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X., Jhee K.H., Kruger W.D. Production of the neuromodulator H2S by cystathionine beta-synthase via the condensation of cysteine and homocysteine. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:52082–52086. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C400481200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Consoli A., Nurjhan N., Capani F., Gerich J. Predominant role of gluconeogenesis in increased hepatic glucose production in NIDDM. Diabetes. 1989;38:550–557. doi: 10.2337/diab.38.5.550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cuadrado A., Rojo A.I., Wells G., Hayes J.D., Cousin S.P., Rumsey W.L., Attucks O.C., Franklin S., Levonen A.L., Kensler T.W., Dinkova-Kostova A.T. Therapeutic targeting of the NRF2 and KEAP1 partnership in chronic diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019;18:295–317. doi: 10.1038/s41573-018-0008-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Curry S.C., Carlton M.W., Raschke R.A. Prevention of fetal and maternal cyanide toxicity from nitroprusside with coinfusion of sodium thiosulfate in gravid ewes. Anesth. Analg. 1997;84:1121–1126. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199705000-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Desai K.M., Chang T., Untereiner A., Wu L. Hydrogen sulfide and the metabolic syndrome. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2011;4:63–73. doi: 10.1586/ecp.10.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Distrutti E., Mencarelli A., Santucci L., Renga B., Orlandi S., Donini A., Shah V., Fiorucci S. The methionine connection: homocysteine and hydrogen sulfide exert opposite effects on hepatic microcirculation in rats. Hepatology. 2008;47:659–667. doi: 10.1002/hep.22037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng X., Chen Y., Zhao J., Tang C., Jiang Z., Geng B. Hydrogen sulfide from adipose tissue is a novel insulin resistance regulator. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;380:153–159. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Filipovic M.R., Zivanovic J., Alvarez B., Banerjee R. Chemical Biology of H2S Signaling through Persulfidation. Chem. Rev. 2017;118:1253–1337. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fiorucci S., Antonelli E., Mencarelli A., Orlandi S., Renga B., Rizzo G., Distrutti E., Shah V., Morelli A. The third gas: H2S regulates perfusion pressure in both the isolated and perfused normal rat liver and in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2005;42:539–548. doi: 10.1002/hep.20817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gao X.H., Krokowski D., Guan B.J., Bederman I., Majumder M., Parisien M., Diatchenko L., Kabil O., Willard B., Banerjee R., et al. Quantitative H2S-mediated protein sulfhydration reveals metabolic reprogramming during the integrated stress response. eLife. 2015;4:e10067. doi: 10.7554/eLife.10067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Geng B., Cai B., Liao F., Zheng Y., Zeng Q., Fan X., Gong Y., Yang J., Cui Q.H., Tang C., Xu G.H. Increase or decrease hydrogen sulfide exert opposite lipolysis, but reduce global insulin resistance in high fatty diet induced obese mice. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e73892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerő D., Torregrossa R., Perry A., Waters A., Le-Trionnaire S., Whatmore J.L., Wood M., Whiteman M. The novel mitochondria-targeted hydrogen sulfide (H2S) donors AP123 and AP39 protect against hyperglycemic injury in microvascular endothelial cells in vitro. Pharmacol. Res. 2016;113:186–198. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghosh Dastidar S., Jagatheesan G., Haberzettl P., Shah J., Hill B.G., Bhatnagar A., Conklin D.J. Glutathione S -transferase P deficiency induces glucose intolerance via JNK-dependent enhancement of hepatic gluconeogenesis. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;315:E1005–E1018. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00345.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hildebrandt T.M., Grieshaber M.K. Three enzymatic activities catalyze the oxidation of sulfide to thiosulfate in mammalian and invertebrate mitochondria. FEBS J. 2008;275:3352–3361. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06482.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hildebrandt T.M., Di Meo I., Zeviani M., Viscomi C., Braun H.P. Proteome adaptations in Ethe1-deficient mice indicate a role in lipid catabolism and cytoskeleton organization via post-translational protein modifications. Biosci. Rep. 2013;33:575–584. doi: 10.1042/BSR20130051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hine C., Harputlugil E., Zhang Y., Ruckenstuhl C., Lee B.C., Brace L., Longchamp A., Treviño-Villarreal J.H., Mejia P., Ozaki C.K., et al. Endogenous hydrogen sulfide production is essential for dietary restriction benefits. Cell. 2015;160:132–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hine C., Kim H.J., Zhu Y., Harputlugil E., Longchamp A., Matos M.S., Ramadoss P., Bauerle K., Brace L., Asara J.M., et al. Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis Regulates Hydrogen Sulfide Production. Cell Metab. 2017;25:1320–1333.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hine C., Zhu Y., Hollenberg A.N., Mitchell J.R. Dietary and Endocrine Regulation of Endogenous Hydrogen Sulfide Production: Implications for Longevity. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018;28:1483–1502. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jackson M.R., Melideo S.L., Jorns M.S. Human sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase catalyzes the first step in hydrogen sulfide metabolism and produces a sulfane sulfur metabolite. Biochemistry. 2012;51:6804–6815. doi: 10.1021/bi300778t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jain S.K., Micinski D., Huning L., Kahlon G., Bass P.F., Levine S.N. Vitamin D and L-cysteine levels correlate positively with GSH and negatively with insulin resistance levels in the blood of type 2 diabetic patients. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014;68:1148–1153. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2014.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kabil O., Motl N., Banerjee R. H2S and its role in redox signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1844:1355–1366. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karwi Q.G., Bice J.S., Baxter G.F. Pre- and postconditioning the heart with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) against ischemia/reperfusion injury in vivo: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Basic Res. Cardiol. 2018;113:6. doi: 10.1007/s00395-017-0664-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kashala-Abotnes E., Okitundu D., Mumba D., Boivin M.J., Tylleskär T., Tshala-Katumbay D. Konzo: a distinct neurological disease associated with food (cassava) cyanogenic poisoning. Brain Res. Bull. 2019;145:87–91. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2018.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim M.S., Krawczyk S.A., Doridot L., Fowler A.J., Wang J.X., Trauger S.A., Noh H.L., Kang H.J., Meissen J.K., Blatnik M., et al. ChREBP regulates fructose-induced glucose production independently of insulin signaling. J. Clin. Invest. 2016;126:4372–4386. doi: 10.1172/JCI81993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimura Y., Koike S., Shibuya N., Lefer D., Ogasawara Y., Kimura H. 3-Mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase produces potential redox regulators cysteine- and glutathione-persulfide (Cys-SSH and GSSH) together with signaling molecules H2S2, H2S3 and H2S. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:10459. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11004-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koike S., Nishimoto S., Ogasawara Y. Cysteine persulfides and polysulfides produced by exchange reactions with H2S protect SH-SY5Y cells from methylglyoxal-induced toxicity through Nrf2 activation. Redox Biol. 2017;12:530–539. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krishnan N., Fu C., Pappin D.J., Tonks N.K. H2S-Induced sulfhydration of the phosphatase PTP1B and its role in the endoplasmic reticulum stress response. Sci. Signal. 2011;4:ra86. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee B.C., Kaya A., Gladyshev V.N. Methionine restriction and life-span control. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 2016;1363:116–124. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis G.F., Carpentier A., Adeli K., Giacca A. Disordered fat storage and mobilization in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Endocr. Rev. 2002;23:201–229. doi: 10.1210/edrv.23.2.0461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Libiad M., Yadav P.K., Vitvitsky V., Martinov M., Banerjee R. Organization of the human mitochondrial hydrogen sulfide oxidation pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:30901–30910. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.602664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Libiad M., Sriraman A., Banerjee R. Polymorphic variants of human rhodanese exhibit differences in thermal stability and sulfur transfer kinetics. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:23579–23588. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.675694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Libiad M., Motl N., Akey D.L., Sakamoto N., Fearon E.R., Smith J.L., Banerjee R. Thiosulfate Sulfurtransferase like Domain Containing 1 Protein Interacts with Thioredoxin. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:2675–2686. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.000826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lutchmansingh F.K., Hsu J.W., Bennett F.I., Badaloo A.V., McFarlane-Anderson N., Gordon-Strachan G.M., Wright-Pascoe R.A., Jahoor F., Boyne M.S. Glutathione metabolism in type 2 diabetes and its relationship with microvascular complications and glycemia. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0198626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mani S., Li H., Untereiner A., Wu L., Yang G., Austin R.C., Dickhout J.G., Lhoták Š., Meng Q.H., Wang R. Decreased endogenous production of hydrogen sulfide accelerates atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2013;127:2523–2534. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mani S., Cao W., Wu L., Wang R. Hydrogen sulfide and the liver. Nitric Oxide. 2014;41:62–71. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2014.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mason T.M. The role of factors that regulate the synthesis and secretion of very-low-density lipoprotein by hepatocytes. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 1998;35:461–487. doi: 10.1080/10408369891234246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meakin P.J., Chowdhry S., Sharma R.S., Ashford F.B., Walsh S.V., McCrimmon R.J., Dinkova-Kostova A.T., Dillon J.F., Hayes J.D., Ashford M.L. Susceptibility of Nrf2-Null Mice to Steatohepatitis and Cirrhosis upon Consumption of a High-Fat Diet Is Associated with Oxidative Stress, Perturbation of the Unfolded Protein Response, and Disturbance in the Expression of Metabolic Enzymes but Not with Insulin Resistance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2014;34:3305–3320. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00677-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mikami Y., Shibuya N., Kimura Y., Nagahara N., Ogasawara Y., Kimura H. Thioredoxin and dihydrolipoic acid are required for 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase to produce hydrogen sulfide. Biochem. J. 2011;439:479–485. doi: 10.1042/BJ20110841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller R.A., Buehner G., Chang Y., Harper J.M., Sigler R., Smith-Wheelock M. Methionine-deficient diet extends mouse lifespan, slows immune and lens aging, alters glucose, T4, IGF-I and insulin levels, and increases hepatocyte MIF levels and stress resistance. Aging Cell. 2005;4:119–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2005.00152.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mishanina T.V., Libiad M., Banerjee R. Biogenesis of reactive sulfur species for signaling by hydrogen sulfide oxidation pathways. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015;11:457–464. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mithieux G., Bady I., Gautier A., Croset M., Rajas F., Zitoun C. Induction of control genes in intestinal gluconeogenesis is sequential during fasting and maximal in diabetes. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003;286:E370–E375. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00299.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Módis K., Coletta C., Erdélyi K., Papapetropoulos A., Szabo C. Intramitochondrial hydrogen sulfide production by 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase maintains mitochondrial electron flow and supports cellular bioenergetics. FASEB J. 2013;27:601–611. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-216507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moreno-Navarrete J.M., Petrov P., Serrano M., Ortega F., García-Ruiz E., Oliver P., Ribot J., Ricart W., Palou A., Bonet M.L., Fernández-Real J.M. Decreased RB1 mRNA, protein, and activity reflect obesity-induced altered adipogenic capacity in human adipose tissue. Diabetes. 2013;62:1923–1931. doi: 10.2337/db12-0977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morris A.A., Page R.L., 2nd, Baumgartner L.J., Mueller S.W., MacLaren R., Fish D.N., Kiser T.H. Thiocyanate Accumulation in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Nitroprusside Infusions. J. Intensive Care Med. 2017;32:547–553. doi: 10.1177/0885066616657004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morton N.M., Nelson Y.B., Michailidou Z., Di Rollo E.M., Ramage L., Hadoke P.W., Seckl J.R., Bunger L., Horvat S., Kenyon C.J., Dunbar D.R. A stratified transcriptomics analysis of polygenic fat and lean mouse adipose tissues identifies novel candidate obesity genes. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e23944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morton N.M., Beltram J., Carter R.N., Michailidou Z., Gorjanc G., McFadden C., Barrios-Llerena M.E., Rodriguez-Cuenca S., Gibbins M.T., Aird R.E., et al. Genetic identification of thiosulfate sulfurtransferase as an adipocyte-expressed antidiabetic target in mice selected for leanness. Nat. Med. 2016;22:771–779. doi: 10.1038/nm.4115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mosharov E., Cranford M.R., Banerjee R. The quantitatively important relationship between homocysteine metabolism and glutathione synthesis by the transsulfuration pathway and its regulation by redox changes. Biochemistry. 2000;39:13005–13011. doi: 10.1021/bi001088w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mutel E., Gautier-Stein A., Abdul-Wahed A., Amigó-Correig M., Zitoun C., Stefanutti A., Houberdon I., Tourette J.A., Mithieux G., Rajas F. Control of blood glucose in the absence of hepatic glucose production during prolonged fasting in mice: induction of renal and intestinal gluconeogenesis by glucagon. Diabetes. 2011;60:3121–3131. doi: 10.2337/db11-0571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagahara N. Catalytic site cysteines of thiol enzyme: sulfurtransferases. J. Amino Acids. 2011;2011:709404. doi: 10.4061/2011/709404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagahara N. Multiple role of 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase: antioxidative function, H2S and polysulfide production and possible SOx production. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018;175:577–589. doi: 10.1111/bph.14100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagahara N., Tanaka M., Tanaka Y., Ito T. Novel Characterization of Antioxidant Enzyme, 3-Mercaptopyruvate Sulfurtransferase-Knockout Mice: Overexpression of the Evolutionarily-Related Enzyme Rhodanese. Antioxidants. 2019;8:116. doi: 10.3390/antiox8050116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nandi D.L., Westley J. Reduced thioredoxin as a sulfur-acceptor substrate for rhodanese. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1998;30:973–977. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(98)00050-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nandi D.L., Horowitz P.M., Westley J. Rhodanese as a thioredoxin oxidase. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2000;32:465–473. doi: 10.1016/s1357-2725(99)00035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Norris E.J., Culberson C.R., Narasimhan S., Clemens M.G. The liver as a central regulator of hydrogen sulfide. Shock. 2011;36:242–250. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3182252ee7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Brien B., Quigg C., Leong T. Severe cyanide toxicity from ‘vitamin supplements’. Eur. J. Emerg. Med. 2005;12:257–258. doi: 10.1097/00063110-200510000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Onkenhout W., Venizelos V., van der Poel P.F., van den Heuvel M.P., Poorthuis B.J. Identification and Quantification of Intermediates of Unsaturated Fatty Acid Metabolism in Plasma of Patients with Fatty Acid Oxidation Disorders. Clin. Chem. 1995;41:1467–1474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Owen O.E., Felig P., Morgan A.P., Wahren J., Cahill G.F., Jr. Liver and kidney metabolism during prolonged starvation. J. Clin. Invest. 1969;48:574–583. doi: 10.1172/JCI106016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pagani S., Galante Y.M. Interaction of rhodanese with mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1983;742:278–284. doi: 10.1016/0167-4838(83)90312-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perez-Riverol Y., Csordas A., Bai J., Bernal-Llinares M., Hewapathirana S., Kundu D.J., Inuganti A., Griss J., Mayer G., Eisenacher M., et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D442–D450. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peters J.M., Hennuyer N., Staels B., Fruchart J.C., Fievet C., Gonzalez F.J., Auwerx J. Alterations in lipoprotein metabolism in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α-deficient mice. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:27307–27312. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.43.27307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pichette J., Gagnon J. Implications of Hydrogen Sulfide in Glucose Regulation: How H2S Can Alter Glucose Homeostasis through Metabolic Hormones. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016;2016:3285074. doi: 10.1155/2016/3285074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qian K., Zhong S., Xie K., Yu D., Yang R., Gong D.W. Hepatic ALT isoenzymes are elevated in gluconeogenic conditions including diabetes and suppressed by insulin at the protein level. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev. 2015;31:562–571. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reiffenstein R. Toxicology Of Hydrogen Sulfide. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1992;32:109–134. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.32.040192.000545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rooney J., Oshida K., Vasani N., Vallanat B., Ryan N., Chorley B.N., Wang X., Bell D.A., Wu K.C., Aleksunes L.M., et al. Activation of Nrf2 in the liver is associated with stress resistance mediated by suppression of the growth hormone-regulated STAT5b transcription factor. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0200004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rui L. Energy metabolism in the liver. Compr. Physiol. 2014;4:177–197. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c130024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sasaki M., Sasako T., Kubota N., Sakurai Y., Takamoto I., Kubota T., Inagi R., Seki G., Goto M., Ueki K., et al. Dual regulation of gluconeogenesis by insulin and glucose in the proximal tubules of the kidney. Diabetes. 2017;66:2339–2350. doi: 10.2337/db16-1602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sestito S., Nesi G., Pi R., Macchia M., Rapposelli S. Hydrogen Sulfide: A Worthwhile Tool in the Design of New Multitarget Drugs. Front Chem. 2017;5:72. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2017.00072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shibuya N., Tanaka M., Yoshida M., Ogasawara Y., Togawa T., Ishii K., Kimura H. 3-Mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase produces hydrogen sulfide and bound sulfane sulfur in the brain. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009;11:703–714. doi: 10.1089/ars.2008.2253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shimokawa I., Komatsu T., Hayashi N., Kim S.E., Kawata T., Park S., Hayashi H., Yamaza H., Chiba T., Mori R. The life-extending effect of dietary restriction requires Foxo3 in mice. Aging Cell. 2015;14:707–709. doi: 10.1111/acel.12340. 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simeonova F.P., Fishbein L., World Health Organization & International Programme on Chemical Safety . 2004. Hydrogen cyanide and cyanides : human health aspects.https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42942 [Google Scholar]
- Singh S., Padovani D., Leslie R.A., Chiku T., Banerjee R. Relative contributions of cystathionine beta-synthase and gamma-cystathionase to H2S biogenesis via alternative trans-sulfuration reactions. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:22457–22466. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.010868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singha S., Kim D., Moon H., Wang T., Kim K.H., Shin Y.H., Jung J., Seo E., Lee S.J., Ahn K.H. Toward a selective, sensitive, fast-responsive, and biocompatible two-photon probe for hydrogen sulfide in live cells. Anal. Chem. 2015;87:1188–1195. doi: 10.1021/ac503806w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slocum S.L., Skoko J.J., Wakabayashi N., Aja S., Yamamoto M., Kensler T.W., Chartoumpekis D.V. Keap1/Nrf2 pathway activation leads to a repressed hepatic gluconeogenic and lipogenic program in mice on a high-fat diet. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2016;591:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2015.11.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smirnov A., Comte C., Mager-Heckel A.M., Addis V., Krasheninnikov I.A., Martin R.P., Entelis N., Tarassov I. Mitochondrial enzyme rhodanese is essential for 5 S ribosomal RNA import into human mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:30792–30803. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.151183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sookoian S., Castaño G.O., Scian R., Fernández Gianotti T., Dopazo H., Rohr C., Gaj G., San Martino J., Sevic I., Flichman D., Pirola C.J. Serum aminotransferases in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease are a signature of liver metabolic perturbations at the amino acid and Krebs cycle level. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016;103:422–434. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.118695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steele R., Wall J.S., De Bodo R.C., Altszuler N. Measurement of size and turnover rate of body glucose pool by the isotope dilution method. Am. J. Physiol. 1956;187:15–24. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1956.187.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stumvoll M. Glucose production by the human kidney--its importance has been underestimated. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 1998;13:2996–2999. doi: 10.1093/ndt/13.12.2996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swerdlow D.I., Preiss D., Kuchenbaecker K.B., Holmes M.V., Engmann J.E., Shah T., Sofat R., Stender S., Johnson P.C., Scott R.A., et al. DIAGRAM Consortium. MAGIC Consortium. InterAct Consortium HMG-coenzyme A reductase inhibition, type 2 diabetes, and bodyweight: evidence from genetic analysis and randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;385:351–361. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61183-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szabo C. Roles of Hydrogen Sulfide in the Pathogenesis of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Complications. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011;17:68–80. doi: 10.1089/ars.2011.4451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szabó G., Veres G., Radovits T., Gero D., Módis K., Miesel-Gröschel C., Horkay F., Karck M., Szabó C. Cardioprotective effects of hydrogen sulfide. Nitric Oxide. 2011;25:201–210. doi: 10.1016/j.niox.2010.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Szabo C., Ransy C., Módis K., Andriamihaja M., Murghes B., Coletta C., Olah G., Yanagi K., Bouillaud F. Regulation of mitochondrial bioenergetic function by hydrogen sulfide. Part I. Biochemical and physiological mechanisms. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014;171:2099–2122. doi: 10.1111/bph.12369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tiranti V., Viscomi C., Hildebrandt T., Di Meo I., Mineri R., Tiveron C., Levitt M.D., Prelle A., Fagiolari G., Rimoldi M., Zeviani M. Loss of ETHE1, a mitochondrial dioxygenase, causes fatal sulfide toxicity in ethylmalonic encephalopathy. Nat. Med. 2009;15:200–205. doi: 10.1038/nm.1907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tolwani R.J., Hamm D.A., Tian L., Sharer J.D., Vockley J., Rinaldo P., Matern D., Schoeb T.R., Wood P.A. Medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency in gene-targeted mice. PLoS Genet. 2005;1:205–212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tonelli C., Chio I.I.C., Tuveson D.A. Transcriptional Regulation by Nrf2. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018;29:1727–1745. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uyeda K., Repa J.J. Carbohydrate response element binding protein, ChREBP, a transcription factor coupling hepatic glucose utilization and lipid synthesis. Cell Metab. 2006;4:107–110. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vinnakota C.V., Peetha N.S., Perrizo M.G., Ferris D.G., Oda R.P., Rockwood G.A., Logue B.A. Comparison of cyanide exposure markers in the biofluids of smokers and non-smokers. Biomarkers. 2012;17:625–633. doi: 10.3109/1354750X.2012.709880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vitvitsky V., Thomas M., Ghorpade A., Gendelman H.E., Banerjee R. A functional transsulfuration pathway in the brain links to glutathione homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:35785–35793. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M602799200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vitvitsky V., Yadav P.K., Kurthen A., Banerjee R. Sulfide oxidation by a noncanonical pathway in red blood cells generates thiosulfate and polysulfides. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:8310–8320. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.639831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vitvitsky V., Yadav P.K., An S., Seravalli J., Cho U.S., Banerjee R. Structural and mechanistic insights into hemoglobincatalyzed hydrogen sulfide oxidation and the fate of polysulfide products. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:5584–5592. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.774943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walsh J., Jenkins R.E., Wong M., Olayanju A., Powell H., Copple I., O’Neill P.M., Goldring C.E., Kitteringham N.R., Park B.K. Identification and quantification of the basal and inducible Nrf2-dependent proteomes in mouse liver: biochemical, pharmacological and toxicological implications. J. Proteomics. 2014;108:171–187. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang R. Physiological implications of hydrogen sulfide: a whiff exploration that blossomed. Physiol. Rev. 2012;92:791–896. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00017.2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wedmann R., Onderka C., Wei S., Szijártó I.A., Miljkovic J.L., Mitrovic A., Lange M., Savitsky S., Yadav P.K., Torregrossa R., et al. Improved tag-switch method reveals that thioredoxin acts as depersulfidase and controls the intracellular levels of protein persulfidation. Chem. Sci. (Camb.) 2016;7:3414–3426. doi: 10.1039/c5sc04818d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whiteman M., Le Trionnaire S., Chopra M., Fox B., Whatmore J. Emerging role of hydrogen sulfide in health and disease: critical appraisal of biomarkers and pharmacological tools. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 2011;121:459–488. doi: 10.1042/CS20110267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization . 2016. Global Report on Diabetes.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565257 [Google Scholar]
- Wu D., Zheng N., Qi K., Cheng H., Sun Z., Gao B., Zhang Y., Pang W., Huangfu C., Ji S., et al. Exogenous hydrogen sulfide mitigates the fatty liver in obese mice through improving lipid metabolism and antioxidant potential. Med. Gas Res. 2015;5:1. doi: 10.1186/s13618-014-0022-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie L., Gu Y., Wen M., Zhao S., Wang W., Ma Y., Meng G., Han Y., Wang Y., Liu G., et al. Hydrogen sulfide induces Keap1 S-sulfhydration and suppresses diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis via Nrf2 activation. Diabetes. 2016;65:3171–3184. doi: 10.2337/db16-0020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xue R., Hao D.D., Sun J.P., Li W.W., Zhao M.M., Li X.H., Chen Y., Zhu J.H., Ding Y.J., Liu J., Zhu Y.C. Hydrogen sulfide treatment promotes glucose uptake by increasing insulin receptor sensitivity and ameliorates kidney lesions in type 2 diabetes. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013;19:5–23. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.5024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yadav P.K., Yamada K., Chiku T., Koutmos M., Banerjee R. Structure and kinetic analysis of H2S production by human mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:20002–20013. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.466177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang G., Zhao K., Ju Y., Mani S., Cao Q., Puukila S., Khaper N., Wu L., Wang R. Hydrogen sulfide protects against cellular senescence via S-sulfhydration of Keap1 and activation of Nrf2. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013;18:1906–1919. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y.K.J., Wu K.C., Liu J., Klaassen C.D. Nrf2 deficiency improves glucose tolerance in mice fed a high-fat diet. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2012;264:305–314. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2012.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L., Yang G., Untereiner A., Ju Y., Wu L., Wang R. Hydrogen sulfide impairs glucose utilization and increases gluconeogenesis in hepatocytes. Endocrinology. 2013;154:114–126. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-1658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L., Wang Y., Li Y., Li L., Xu S., Feng X., Liu S. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S)-releasing compounds: Therapeutic potential in cardiovascular diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2018;9:1066. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
(A) Significant GO terms represented by proteins that are more abundant in the ND-fed Tst—/— liver compared with normal diet-fed C57BL/6J. (B) Significant GO terms represented by proteins that are less abundant in the ND-fed Tst—/— liver compared with normal diet-fed C57BL/6J. ‘Genes’ indicates the number of genes in the Tst—/— that represent the changes driving the GO term. The lists include all regulated GO terms at a significance threshold of p < 0.05
Data Availability Statement
-
•
Proteomics and persulfidomics root data from the iTraq and persulfidated peptide mass spectrometry experiments have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (Perez-Riverol et al., 2019) partner repository with the dataset identifier ProteomeXchange: PXD028909.
-
•
This paper does not report original code.
-
•
Any additional information required to reanalyse the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.