Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is traditionally considered a glycolytic tumor with a poor prognosis while lacking targeted therapies. Here we show that high expression of dihydrolipoamide S-succinyltransferase (DLST), a tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle enzyme, predicts poor overall and recurrence-free survival among TNBC patients. DLST depletion suppresses growth and induces death in subsets of human TNBC cell lines, which are capable of utilizing glutamine anaplerosis. Metabolomics profiling reveals significant changes in the TCA cycle and reactive oxygen species (ROS) related pathways for sensitive but not resistant TNBC cells. Consequently, DLST depletion in sensitive TNBC cells increases ROS levels while N-acetyl-L-cysteine partially rescues cell growth. Importantly, suppression of the TCA cycle through DLST depletion or CPI-613, a drug currently in clinical trials for treating other cancers, decreases the burden and invasion of these TNBC. Together, our data demonstrate differential TCA-cycle usage in TNBC and provide therapeutic implications for the DLST-dependent subsets.
Subject terms: Cancer metabolism, Breast cancer
Shen and Korm et al. investigate the role of dihydrolipoamide S-succinyltransferase (DLST), a tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle enzyme, in the metabolic heterogeneity of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines. They show that either depletion or inhibition of DLST in the dependent cells leads to decreased invasion and metastasis in vitro and in vivo.
Introduction
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive malignancy associated with high recurrence rates for localized disease and increased risk of visceral metastasis, as well as poor prognosis for advanced disease1,2. Due to the absence of hormone receptor overexpression and HER2 amplification, TNBC is not suited for targeted therapy directed against these receptors, with chemotherapy being the main treatment option, especially for those without BRCA1/2 mutations1,3. Moreover, lacking predictive prognostic biomarkers, it remains difficult for clinicians to select effective therapeutic approaches for this disease4. An improved understanding of disease etiology could reveal novel cellular pathways for therapeutic intervention and better TNBC prognostication.
Although targeting metabolic dependencies emerges as an effective approach for the treatment of aggressive malignancies such as acute leukemia5, TNBC cells are highly heterogeneous in terms of their dependence on specific metabolic pathways6. Early studies indicated that TNBC cells utilize predominantly aerobic glycolysis instead of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) for energy production7. A recent study, however, shows that TNBC cells shift from glycolysis to mitochondrial OXPHOS during metastatic spread8. Similarly, upregulated fatty acid oxidation is detected in metastatic breast cancer9. Despite these findings, the dependence of TNBC cells on the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle remains unclear.
Inside the TCA cycle, dihydrolipoamide S-succinyltransferase (DLST) is the E2 transferase of α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex (KGDHC) that regulates the irreversible conversion of α-ketoglutarate to succinyl-CoA10. Here we show that high DLST expression predicts poor overall and recurrence-free survival among TNBC patients. DLST depletion impairs the growth, survival, and migration of TNBC cells that have relatively intact TCA-cycle function, while minimally affecting TNBC cells with the defective TCA cycle function. Importantly, DLST-dependent TNBC cells exhibit decreased tumor burden and invasion in zebrafish xenografts when treated with CPI-613, a lipoate derivative that can inhibit KGDHC activity and is currently in clinical trials for treating other cancers (NCT03793140; NCT03699319; NCT04217317; and NCT04593758). Together, our data demonstrate that DLST-dependence in TNBC dictates their usage of the TCA cycle to promote tumor cell growth and invasion. Our studies provide mechanistic insights for metabolic heterogeneity of TNBC and therapeutic implications for the DLST-dependent subsets.
Results
High DLST expression predicts poor overall and recurrence-free survival among TNBC patients
We previously reported that DLST contributes to MYC-driven leukemogenesis11. To study the role of DLST in breast cancer pathogenesis, we performed in silico Kaplan–Meier survival analysis using an online tool (http://kmplot.com/analysis/)12. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the receptor’s expression in tumor cells: ER+, ER−, and TNBC12. We then correlated the expression of DLST and the other two KGDHC subunits, dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (DLD) and oxoglutarate dehydrogenase (OGDH), with survival probability among each patient group. We found that DLST expression is associated with poor overall survival with a similar trend for recurrence-free survival in the ER+ patients (Fig. 1a, b). Different from ER- patients, which showed inconsistent overall and recurrence-free survival, high DLST expression reliably predicted poor overall and recurrence-free survival among TNBC patients (Fig. 1a, b). A similar observation for recurrence-free survival was made for TNBC patients when analyzing another publicly available database (GSE2034)13 (Supplementary Fig. 1a), despite somewhat different criteria applied in defining receptor positivity compared to the KMplot dataset. Different from DLST, neither DLD nor OGDH expression could similarly predict TNBC patient prognosis in both datasets, although OGDH showed a trend as DLST in predicting TNBC patient prognosis (Supplementary Figs. 1–3). These findings demonstrate that high expression of DLST predicts disease relapse and poor survival among TNBC patients, indicating a different role of DLST in TNBC pathogenesis when compared to leukemia.
Human TNBC cells exhibit differential dependence on DLST
Next, we utilized cell line models to study how DLST contributes to TNBC pathogenesis. Our western blotting analysis revealed that DLST protein expression fluctuates among breast cancer cell lines (Fig. 2a). Interestingly, DLST protein expression in all of the ER+ cell lines tested is lower than that of the non-transformed MCF10A cells (Fig. 2a). However, DLST expression in TNBC cell lines differs, with some having similar protein levels compared to the non-transformed MCF10A cells and others with lower expression of DLST, which mimics its protein and transcript levels in both TNBC patient samples and cell lines (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Fig. 4a–c). Among TNBC cell lines tested, Hs578T and SUM159PT were the only two that showed relatively lower DLST expression on both transcript and protein levels (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Fig. 4c). Next, we knocked down DLST by shRNA in breast cancer cell lines and found that all of the ER+ cell lines were sensitive to DLST depletion, while TNBC cell lines exhibited a differential dependence on DLST (Fig. 2b; Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). DLST knockdown significantly reduced the growth of several TNBC cell lines: HCC1806, BT-549, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-436 (Fig. 2b; Supplementary Fig. 5b). However, DLST depletion minimally impacted SUM159PT and Hs578T TNBC cells, which had the lowest DLST expression, as well as the non-transformed MCF-10A cells (Fig. 2a, b; Supplementary Fig. 5a, b).
To understand the cellular mechanisms underlying TNBC’s differential response to DLST depletion, we analyzed DLST-dependent BT-549 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines, as well as independent Hs578T and SUM159PT cell lines. At 5 days post-transduction of shLuciferase, shDLST1, or shDLST2 virus, we assessed the apoptosis and necrosis of these TNBC cells by measuring Annexin V and Ethidium homodimer III stainings. DLST depletion by shRNA significantly increased apoptosis and necrosis of BT-549 and MDA-MB-231 cells while minimally impacting Hs578T and SUM159PT cells (Fig. 2c; Supplementary Fig. 6a). Cell cycle analysis was then performed for these TNBC cells by propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. DLST depletion caused a significant change in G1-phase and an increase in G2-phase arrest of BT-549 and MDA-MB-231 cells but only a moderate S or G1-phase change in Hs578T and SUM159PT cells (Fig. 2d; Supplementary Fig. 6b). Taken together, the above data support that subsets of the TNBC cell lines depend on DLST for growth and survival.
Human DLST-dependent TNBC cells possess an intact TCA cycle function and utilize glutamine anaplerosis
Since DLST is a TCA cycle transferase11, we next evaluated the ability of these TNBC cell lines, BT-549, MDA-MB-231, SUM159PT, and Hs578T in utilizing the TCA cycle by galactose replacement assay. When galactose replaces glucose in the medium, cells will produce ATP preferentially through the TCA cycle instead of glycolysis14,15. Hence, if a cell can maintain its cellular ATP levels in the galactose medium, its TCA cycle function should be intact, and vice versa. Consistent with their dependence on DLST, BT-549 and MDA-MB-231 cells continuously produced ATP in the galactose medium with cellular ATP levels minimally affected (Supplementary Fig. 7). In contrast, SUM159PT and Hs578T, the two cell lines with lower dependency on DLST, experienced a significant decrease in ATP levels when cultured in the galactose medium (Supplementary Fig. 7). Next, we measured the oxygen consumption rates (OCR) by seahorse technology to further document the differential utilization of the TCA cycle in BT-549 and Hs578T cells. DLST depletion significantly decreased all aspects of OCR in DLST-dependent BT-549 cells, including basal, maximal, ATP-linked, and proton-leak OCR (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 8a). However, OCR is minimally impacted in DLST-independent Hs578T cells upon DLST knockdown (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 8a).
Given that TNBC cells are addicted to glutamine and that DLST/KGDHC governs the entry of glutamine into the TCA cycle16–20, we asked whether TNBC cells utilize glutamine anaplerosis. All TNBC cell lines tested are sensitive to glutamine withdrawal; however, only DLST-dependent TNBC cells can be partially rescued by the addition of exogenous TCA-cycle intermediates, dimethyl-2-oxoglutarate or mono-methyl hydrogen succinate (Supplementary Fig. 8b). Next, we examined the effect of DLST depletion on glutamine anaplerosis in both DLST-dependent and independent TNBC cells. Using 13C-labeled glutamine as a tracer, we measured the percentage changes of glutamine-derived metabolites upon DLST knockdown in DLST-dependent BT-549 and independent Hs578T cells (Fig. 3b). Both cell lines incorporated over 90% of the labeled glutamine in the presence and absence of DLST knockdown (Supplementary Fig. 9a). In addition, over 80% of α-ketoglutarate were labeled with 13C-glutamine carbons in both cell lines without significant differences between control and DLST knockdown cells (Supplementary Fig. 9b). These results indicate that 13C-labeled glutamine was incorporated into these cells efficiently and the α-ketoglutarate carbons were mainly from glutamine. Despite similar glutamine contribution to the TCA cycle, DLST knockdown in BT-549 cells significantly decreased the percentage of M+4 and M + 5 citrate, M+2 succinate, M+4 fumarate, and M+4 malate, while increasing the percentage of M+0/M+4 succinate, M+0/M+1 malate, and M+2 fumarate (Fig. 3c). In contrast, DLST knockdown had minimal effect on the contribution of glutamine to cycle intermediates in Hs578T cells (Fig. 3d). Collectively, these results demonstrate that the TNBC cell lines that depend on DLST for growth and survival have a higher capacity to utilize the TCA cycle, glutamine anaplerosis in particular, compared to the independent ones.
DLST knockdown induces discrete metabolic alterations in human DLST-dependent TNBC cells
Next, we performed unbiased metabolomics profiling to assess the broad metabolic changes induced by DLST inactivation in human TNBC cells. Specifically, BT-549 and Hs578T cells were transduced with the shLuciferase or shDLST hairpin. At early day 4 post-transduction when we could not detect apparent cellular changes, total metabolites were extracted from these TNBC cells for mass spectrometry analysis as described21. Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that DLST inactivation significantly impacted multiple metabolic pathways in DLST-dependent BT-549 cells while minimally impacting DLST-independent Hs578T cells (Fig. 4a). Among those altered pathways, prominent changes were found in aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, pyrimidine metabolism, and amino-acid metabolism pathways (Fig. 4a). As expected, the TCA cycle was significantly altered in BT-549 cells, with decreased succinyl-CoA and significantly increased succinate, phosphoenolpyruvate, isocitrate, and citrate levels (Fig. 4b; Supplementary Fig. 10a).
Besides the changes observed in the TCA cycle, several pathways regulating redox balance, such as glutathione metabolism, cysteine, and methionine metabolism, and the pentose phosphate pathway, were also significantly altered in BT-549 cells (Fig. 4b–e). DLST downregulation in BT-549 cells led to a significant increase of NADPH, glutathione disulfide, and glutamate levels, as well as a mild increase of glycine levels (Fig. 4c, f). However, cysteine showed a decrease under DLST knockdown (Fig. 4c, d), accompanied by apparent changes of cysteine metabolism, with significantly increased levels of S-adenosyl-L-methionine, methionine, and cystine (Fig. 4d). The disturbance of the pentose phosphate pathway upon DLST knockdown led to a significant increase of glucose-6-phosphate, D-erythrose-4-phosphate, and 6-phospho-D-gluconate levels, as well as a decrease in 5-phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate levels (Fig. 4e). In sharp contrast to changes in BT-549 cells, DLST knockdown only caused minimal metabolic changes in Hs578T cells (Fig. 4a; Supplementary Fig. 10a, b). Hence, DLST depletion induces differential metabolic alterations in human TNBC cells based on their dependency on DLST.
DLST depletion induces ROS production in human DLST-dependent TNBC cells
Since the metabolomics data revealed pathway alterations related to redox balance in BT-549 cells, we asked how DLST knockdown influenced the production of ROS in human TNBC cell lines, in the presence or absence of a ROS inducer, tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP). DLST knockdown significantly increased the ROS production in DLST-dependent BT-549 and MDA-MB-231 cells but not in the independent SUM159PT and Hs578T cells (Fig. 5a). To assess the source of ROS production upon DLST knockdown, we stained BT-549 and Hs578T cells with a mitochondrial superoxidase (mitoSOX) dye. DLST inactivation induced a significant increase of mitoSOX signals in BT-549 cells but not in Hs578T cells, indicating mitochondria as the location of ROS production (Fig. 5b, c). To understand whether the increased ROS levels in DLST-dependent TNBC cells contributed to decreased cell growth upon DLST inactivation, we supplemented the media of TNBC cell lines with 2 mM of N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) starting at 2 days post-transduction. Supplement with NAC partially rescued the growth of BT-549 and MDA-MB-231 cells upon DLST inactivation (Fig. 5d). These findings indicate that mitochondrial ROS production serves as one mechanism to impair cell growth upon DLST depletion in TNBC cells.
DLST depletion inhibits the migration, growth, and invasion of human DLST-dependent TNBC cells
TNBC is an aggressive disease and often metastasizes to distant organs in patients22. To understand whether DLST plays a role in TNBC aggression, we performed in vitro transwell migration assays using human BT-549 and MDA-MB-231 cells. DLST depletion significantly slowed the migration of these TNBC cells (Fig. 6a). To assess the contribution of DLST to TNBC aggression in vivo, we transduced BT-549 cells with Doxycycline-inducible shDLST2 and subsequently transplanted BT-549 cells into 2-day-old zebrafish, which lack adaptive immunity, to generate zebrafish xenografts. At 4 days of post-transplantation, DLST depletion significantly reduced tumor burden and invasion, which can be rescued by NAC treatment (Fig. 6b). Immunofluorescent staining of zebrafish xenografts revealed that DLST depletion induced mitochondrial ROS, necrosis, and apoptosis while reducing proliferation in BT-549 cells, all of which were again rescued by NAC treatment (Fig. 7a, b). The above data show that DLST supports the growth, survival, and invasion of TNBC cells that possess the intact TCA cycle function.
DLST-dependent TNBC cells are sensitive to CPI-613 treatment
Since subsets of TNBC depend on DLST for growth and disease invasion, we next asked whether they are sensitive to compounds targeting DLST-mediated TCA functions. CPI-613 is a lipoate derivative that can inhibit KGDHC activity and is currently in clinical trials for treating relapsed/refractory lymphoma, metastatic pancreatic cancer, and clear cell sarcoma (NCT03793140; NCT03699319; NCT04217317; and NCT04593758). We thus applied CP-613 to treat zebrafish xenografts transplanted with human TNBC cells. We found that similar to the effect of DLST depletion, CPI-613 treatment effectively decreased tumor cell invasion in zebrafish xenografts transplanted with BT-549 cells (Fig. 8a, b). Consistent with their sensitivity to DLST depletion, CPI-613 treatment also reduced the tumor burden of these zebrafish xenografts (Fig. 8a, c). However, CPI-613 did not reduce the invasion or tumor burden of zebrafish xenografts transplanted with Hs578T cells, which are insensitive to DLST depletion (Fig. 8a–c). Interestingly, BT549 cells are more invasive in zebrafish xenografts compared to Hs578T cells (Fig. 8a, b). Hence, our data demonstrate that DLST-dependent TNBC cells are sensitive to the TCA-cycle inhibitor CPI-613.
Discussion
TNBC is highly heterogeneous in its usage of metabolic pathways6. However, no viable markers exist to categorize TNBC based on their metabolic dependence. While TNBC has been considered glycolytic cancer with dysfunctional mitochondria7,23,24, recent studies indicate that chemotherapy-resistant TNBC and invasive cells from primary tumors utilize OXPHOS25,26. Despite this knowledge, whether TNBC utilizes the TCA cycle remains elusive. Here we performed DLST inactivation studies in a panel of TNBC cell lines to understand the metabolic heterogeneity and dependence on the TCA cycle. Our studies show that subsets of TNBC are dependent on DLST and the TCA cycle for growth and invasion. Galactose replacement and bioenergetic assays demonstrate that DLST-dependent TNBC cells utilize the TCA cycle and OXPHOS, while the less dependent TNBC cells minimally do. In DLST-dependent TNBC cells, DLST depletion inhibits OCR, leads to prominent alterations of TCA cycle metabolites, slows TNBC cell migration, and decreases disease burden and invasion in zebrafish xenografts. Hence, our studies demonstrate the differential utility of the TCA cycle in TNBC cells and unveil DLST-dependency as a valid molecular marker to predict TCA cycle usage in TNBC.
Glutamine is an important carbon source for TNBC17, but little is known about how glutamine is utilized in human TNBC cells. Our 13C labeled glutamine tracing data show that glutamine contributes to cycle intermediates in both DLST-dependent and independent TNBC cells. However, DLST depletion significantly reduces glutamine-contributed cycle intermediates in DLST-dependent TNBC cells, while minimally affecting independent ones. Consistent with our metabolomics data, DLST-dependent TNBC cells can be partially rescued upon glutamine withdrawal through supplementation of cycle intermediates, while the independent ones cannot. Hence, glutamine metabolism in TNBC is highly heterogeneous, and DLST/KGDHC mediates glutamine anaplerosis only in DLST-dependent TNBC cells. Interestingly, DLST depletion does not enhance the reductive carboxylation pathway, as no increased M+3 malate or M+5 citrate was detected in BT-549 or Hs578T cells. Instead, α-ketoglutarate in DLST-independent Hs578T cells can be converted into glutamate then glutamine to support cell survival under glutamine deprivation conditions27. On the other hand, DLST depletion in BT-549 cells leads to increased M+0/M+4 succinate, M+0/M+1 malate, and M+2 fumarate, indicating metabolic flexibility and compensatory effects. Our unbiased metabolomics profiling analysis reveals that DLST inactivation in BT-549 cells induces significant alterations in the TCA cycle, as well as nucleotide and amino-acid metabolic pathways, such as purine, pyrimidine, and serine and threonine metabolism. These data further support that glutamine anaplerosis replenishes cycle intermediates to support macromolecule and nucleotide synthesis in DLST-dependent TNBC cells.
The aggressive clinical course, dismal prognosis, and lack of effective targeted agents for TNBC render the identification of predictive biomarkers and the development of novel therapeutic approaches critical to improve patients’ survival. In particular, it is difficult to predict the sensitivity of chemotherapy or targeted therapy on TNBC patients, due to its intrinsic molecular and metabolic heterogeneity28,29. Our analysis of clinical data shows that high expression of DLST, a TCA cycle enzyme, is associated with an increased incidence of distant recurrence and poor survival among TNBC patients. Additionally, the majority of human DLST-dependent TNBC cell lines utilize the TCA cycle for growth and survival. Interestingly, TNBC cells with relatively high DLST expression use the TCA and are more invasive yet sensitive to DLST depletion, while most of those with relatively low DLST expression are not. Hence, our findings predict that TNBC patients with relatively high DLST expression in their tumor cells should be sensitive to inhibitors targeting the TCA cycle. CPI-613, an inhibitor targeting DLST/KGDHC in the TCA cycle, is in clinical trials for treating other types of cancers and shows promising safety and efficacy profiles (NCT03793140; NCT03699319; NCT04217317; and NCT04593758)30,31. Our data demonstrate that DLST-dependent TNBC cells are sensitive to CPI-613. Therefore, CPI-613 could serve as a targeted therapy for treating the aggressive TNBC with high DLST expression alone or in combination with chemotherapy.
Methods
Patient sample analysis
To assess the role of DLST in breast cancer pathogenesis, we performed in silico Kaplan–Meier analysis to determine the association of DLST expression with the overall and recurrence-free survival of breast cancer patients using the online tool and database (http://kmplot.com/analysis/)12. We applied the best cut-off, array, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ER, IHC for PR, and array for HER2 to stratify patients, which provides the optimal curve segregation. To further verify the findings, we re-analyzed the publicly available dataset (GSE2034) from NCBI/Genbank GEO database13. We also applied the best cut-off and receptor expression (ER < 1000, PR < 20, and HER2 < 3700 as being negative) to categorize patient samples into three categories: ER+ (n = 200), ER− (n = 86), and TNBC (n = 41). Cox regression analysis was utilized to determine the association of DLST expression with recurrence-free survival among breast cancer patients.
Cell culture
All cell lines were obtained from the ATCC (www.atcc.org) and cultured at 37 °C supplemented with 5% CO2. Hs578T, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-436, SUM159PT, and HEK293T cells were cultured in DMEM medium (MT10013CV, Corning) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, F0926, Sigma). BT-549, HCC1806, ZR-75-1, and HCC1428 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (MT10040CV, Corning) with 10% FBS. MCF10A cells were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in DMEM/F12 medium (SH30023.FS, Hyclone) containing 5% horse serum (26-050-088, Fisher Scientific), 20 ng ml−1 epidermal growth factor (E4127, Sigma), 100 ng ml−1 cholera toxin (C8052, Sigma), 10 ng ml−1 insulin (I9278, Sigma), and 500 ng ml−1 hydrocortisone (H4001, Sigma) as described32. T-47D cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 0.2 U ml−1 bovine insulin (I0516, Sigma). CAMA-1 cells were cultured in EMEM medium (10009CV, Coring) with 10% FBS. MCF7 cells were cultured in EMEM medium with 10% FBS and 0.01 mg ml−1 human recombinant insulin (I9278, Sigma).
Protein extraction and western blotting
Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer supplemented with 1× Halt proteinase inhibitor (87786, Thermo Scientific) and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (BP479, Boston Bioproducts). Primary antibodies include anti-DLST (H00001743, Abnova) and anti-ACTIN (sc-47778, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Secondary antibodies included goat anti-mouse (31430, Thermo Scientific) or anti-rabbit HRP antibodies (65-6120, Thermo Scientific). Chemiluminescence Supersignal West Pico was from Thermo Scientific (Cat# 34080). Autoradiographs were imaged using a G: BOX Chemi XT4 (Syngene).
Lentivirus transduction and cell growth assay
The control and DLST shRNA hairpins (shLuciferase: 5′-CTTCGAAATGTCCGTTCGGTT-3′, shDLST1: 5′-CCCTAGTGCTGGTATACTATA-3′, and shDLST2: 5′-TGTCTCATAGCCTCGAATATC-3′) were cloned into the pLKO.1-puro vector. Lentivirus production and transduction were conducted as previously described33. The medium was changed 16 h (h) after virus transduction, with puromycin (1 μg ml−1, P7255, Sigma) added at 40 h post-transduction. On day 4 post-transduction, the cells were trypsinized and seeded into a 96-well plate at a density of 500 cells per well. CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (G9242, Promega) was used to assess the rates of cell growth according to the manufacturer’s instruction on 4, 6, 8, and 10 days post-transduction. In the N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC, A7250, Sigma) rescue experiment, cell proliferation was observed at day 6 post-transduction.
Cell cycle, apoptosis, and necrosis assay
Two million cells were fixed with 95% precooled ethanol, incubated overnight at −20 °C, washed with Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS, SH30028LS, Corning), and stained with propidium iodide/RNase staining buffer (BDB550825, BD Biosciences) containing 0.1% sodium citrate for 45 min (min) on ice in the dark. These cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry using BD LSRII SORP (BD Biosciences). ModFit LT software (Verify Software House) was used to generate DNA histograms. Each experiment was performed in triplicates.
The Apoptosis and Necrosis Quantification Kit (30017, Biotium) was used to quantify apoptotic and necrotic TNBC cells at 5 days post-transduction, according to the manufacture’s protocol. Images were taken using a Revolve microscope (ECHO) and data were analyzed by Image J software. Apoptotic and necrotic cells were counted and normalized relative to the total number of cells in each well.
ROS detection
ROS detection was performed using 2,7′-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction (ab113851, Abcam) with modifications. Briefly, on day 4 post-transduction, TNBC cells were trypsinized from 6-well plates and incubated with DCFDA (20 µM) with a cell density of 500,000 ml−1 for 45 min at 37 °C in the dark. These cells were then washed with DBPS, seeded into a 96-well plate at a density of 25,000 per well, and treated with or without 50 µM tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) for 16 h. The ROS signals were detected using a microplate reader (BMG LABTECH) under the excitation and emission wavelength at 485 nm and 535 nm, respectively.
Metabolomics profiling and analysis
Glutamine-free DMEM or RPMI medium was supplemented with 12C or 13C isotope-labeled L-Glutamine (G8540 and 605166, Sigma) to prepare media for metabolomics experiments. Lentivirus transduction was performed as described above. On day 3 post-transduction, the medium was replaced with the 2 mM 13C or 12C glutamine medium for BT-549 cells and 4 mM 13C or 12C glutamine medium for Hs578T cells. 24 h later, cells were washed with DPBS twice and extracted for polar metabolites. Specifically, pre-chilled 80% methanol (MeOH, A412P-4, Fisher Scientific) at −80 °C was added to the cells. After 20 min of incubation at −80 °C, the resulting mixture was scraped, collected into a 15-ml centrifuge tube, and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C. Insoluble pellets were re-extracted with 1 ml of MeOH. The supernatants from two rounds of extraction were combined then dried with a Savant DNA 120 speedVac (Thermo Scientific). The unlabeled and 13C labeled metabolites were analyzed by LC-MS at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
The cell number of each sample was used to normalize the raw value of polar metabolites, which were then visualized and analyzed for statistical differences in R v3.5.3. Metabolites with missing values in more than half of the samples were removed and the missing data for the retained metabolites were imputed with the half of minimum values of its corresponding metabolite. Metabolites with either P values less than 0.05 from a two-sided t-test or absolute fold change greater than 1.5 were selected for pathway enrichment analysis by MetaboAnalyst 4.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/). Isotope-labeled data were also processed similarly. FDR (false discovery rate) adjusted P values of pathway enrichment results for BT-549 and Hs578T cells with and without DLST knockdown were used to generate the pathway heatmap using the heatmap.2 function in the R package gplots. Heatmap plots for metabolites in the chosen pathway were generated using the levelplot function in the R package lattice.
Immunofluorescence staining and imaging
TNBC cells were seeded on the sterile cover glass and stained with mitoSOXTM Red (M36008, Thermo Scientific), according to the manufacturing instructions. Cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (158127, Sigma) for 10 min, permeabilized with DPBS containing 0.2% Triton X-100 (T8787, Sigma) for 5 min at room temperature, and co-stained with DAPI (300 nM, D3571, NEB). Cells were mounted using Fluoromount-G (0100-01, SouthernBiotech) on glass slides (12-550-15, Fisher Scientific). Images were captured using an RVL-100-G microscope (ECHO).
Zebrafish xenograft assays
Zebrafish (Danio rerio) husbandry was performed as described34, in the aquatic facility at Boston University School of Medicine (BUSM), following the protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Use and Care Committee at BUSM.
Zebrafish embryos were gradually reared to 37 °C and injected with ~200 TNBC cells into the perivitelline space of each embryo at 2-day post-fertilization (dpf). BT-549 cells were transduced with doxycycline-regulated shDLST2 and stained with a cell tracker dye (C7001, Thermo Fisher). At 3 h post-transplantation, zebrafish xenografts were sorted into four groups and incubated with fish water containing either vehicle (distilled water) or 10 μg ml−1 of doxycycline (D9891, Sigma) to induce shDLST2 expression in the presence and absence of 300 μM NAC (A7250, Sigma). Fish water was refreshed daily. At day 2 post-transplantation, fish were observed under the microscope and their images were captured. For the CPI-613 treatment experiment, BT-549 and Hs578T cells transduced with pWPI-RFP were injected to fish embryos that were treated with 5 μM CPI-613 (HY-15453, MCE) or vehicle. On day 2 post-transplantation, zebrafish were euthanized and fixed with 4% Paraformaldehyde (158127, Thermo Scientific) overnight. The fixed fish were then imaged under the MVX10 microscope (OLYMPUS) or stored in 100% MeOH at −20 °C.
Fixed zebrafish embryos were rehydrated through series dilutions of ethanol (75%, 50%, and 25% in PBS) for 5 min each, permeabilized with DBST containing 1% Triton-100 for 4 × 15 min, and washed with DBST containing 0.2% Triton-100. Antibody blocking buffer (DBST containing 0.2% Triton-100, 10% horse serum, and 1% DMSO) was used to block the samples for 1 h at room temperature. Embryos were then incubated with anti-Ki67 (ab15580, Abcam) or anti-caspase-3 (559565, BD Biosciences) primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with the secondary antibody (anti-Cy5, A10523, Invitrogen) for 2 h at room temperature. Embryos were mounted in a glass dish and subjected to imaging using the RVL-100-G Microscope (ECHO).
Statistics and reproducibility
The association of DLST expression with overall and recurrence-free survival among patients with different subtypes of breast cancer was assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis. The comparison of the statistical difference between the survival curves was done with the log-rank test. The student’s t-test was used to analyze differences in DLST protein expression, OCR, ATP levels, metabolites, and isotope-labeled glutamine contribution to metabolic derivates for TNBC cells with control vs. DLST knockdown. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was utilized to assess differences in cell growth rates, apoptosis, necrosis, cell cycle distribution, and ROS levels among TNBC cells in the presence or absence of DLST knockdown. Two-way ANOVA was used to analyze differences in mitoSOX staining, cell growth rates for NAC rescue experiments, tumor cell migration, tumor burden, and tumor invasion in zebrafish xenografts in the presence or absence of DLST knockdown. All experiments except re-analysis of the publicly available datasets were conducted at least three times independently. P values equal to or less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant without being adjusted for multiple comparisons.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Michael T. Kirber from the Imaging Core Facility at Boston University School of Medicine for expert help with imaging acquisitions; and Dr. Brian Tilton from Boston University Flow Cytometry Core Facility for assistance with cell sorting. This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH; CA134743 and CA215059), the Karin Grunebaum Cancer Foundation, the St. Baldrick’s Foundation, the Mary Kay Ash Foundation, the American Cancer Society (RSG-17-204-01-TBG), and Boston University (a Ralph Edwards Career Development Professorship and a Dahod pilot grant) to H.F; N.S. and D.L. acknowledge the training support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL007501). S.K. was supported by a Dahod International Scholar grant from Boston University. The content of this research is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
Author contributions
H.F. conceived and supervised the project. H.F., N.S., S.K., T.K., D.L., and E.R. designed the experiments. N.S., S.K., T.K., D.L., J.K., E.R., and A.L. performed the experiments. N.S., S.K., T.K., D.L., J.K., E.R., X.Y.Z., H.W., C.T.L., and H.F. analyzed the data. T.K., H.F., S.K., N.S., D.L., and J.E. wrote the manuscript with inputs from all other authors. W.X.Z. and O.S. provided experimental support and intellectual inputs.
Data availability
We confirm that all relevant data and methods are included in the main Article and the Supplementary Information section. The source data for the graphs and charts in the figures is available as Supplementary Data file and any remaining information can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Peer review information Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Anam Akhtar.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Ning Shen, Sovannarith Korm.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42003-021-02805-8.
References
- 1.Malorni L, et al. Clinical and biologic features of triple-negative breast cancers in a large cohort of patients with long-term follow-up. Breast cancer Res. Treat. 2012;136:795–804. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2315-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bianchini G, Balko JM, Mayer IA, Sanders ME, Gianni L. Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2016;13:674–690. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Anders CK, Carey LA. Biology, metastatic patterns, and treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Clin. breast cancer. 2009;9:S73–S81. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2009.s.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Grob TJ, et al. Rare oncogenic mutations of predictive markers for targeted therapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast cancer Res. Treat. 2012;134:561–567. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2092-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pollyea, D. A. et al. Venetoclax with azacitidine disrupts energy metabolism and targets leukemia stem cells in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Med.24, 1859–1866 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 6.Lanning NJ, et al. Metabolic profiling of triple-negative breast cancer cells reveals metabolic vulnerabilities. Cancer Metab. 2017;5:6–6. doi: 10.1186/s40170-017-0168-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pelicano H, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction in some triple-negative breast cancer cell lines: role of mTOR pathway and therapeutic potential. Breast cancer Res. 2014;16:434. doi: 10.1186/s13058-014-0434-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Davis RT, et al. Transcriptional diversity and bioenergetic shift in human breast cancer metastasis revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020;22:310–320. doi: 10.1038/s41556-020-0477-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wright HJ, et al. CDCP1 drives triple-negative breast cancer metastasis through reduction of lipid-droplet abundance and stimulation of fatty acid oxidation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E6556. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1703791114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Berg, J. M., Tymoczko, J. L., Stryer, L. & Stryer, L. Biochemistry, 5th edn (W. H. Freeman, 2002).
- 11.Anderson NM, et al. The TCA cycle transferase DLST is important for MYC-mediated leukemogenesis. Leukemia. 2016;30:1365–1374. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gyorffy B, et al. An online survival analysis tool to rapidly assess the effect of 22,277 genes on breast cancer prognosis using microarray data of 1,809 patients. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2010;123:725–731. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0674-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang Y, et al. Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet (Lond., Engl.) 2005;365:671–679. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17947-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reitzer LJ, Wice BM, Kennell D. Evidence that glutamine, not sugar, is the major energy source for cultured HeLa cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1979;254:2669–2676. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)30124-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Robinson BH, Petrova-Benedict R, Buncic JR, Wallace DC. Nonviability of cells with oxidative defects in galactose medium: A screening test for affected patient fibroblasts. Biochem. Med. Metab. Biol. 1992;48:122–126. doi: 10.1016/0885-4505(92)90056-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.DeBerardinis RJ, et al. Beyond aerobic glycolysis: transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:19345–19350. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709747104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Timmerman LA, et al. Glutamine sensitivity analysis identifies the xCT antiporter as a common triple-negative breast tumor therapeutic target. Cancer Cell. 2013;24:450–465. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kung H-N, Marks JR, Chi J-T. Glutamine synthetase is a genetic determinant of cell type-specific glutamine independence in breast epithelia. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1002229–e1002229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Possemato R, et al. Functional genomics reveal that the serine synthesis pathway is essential in breast cancer. Nature. 2011;476:346–350. doi: 10.1038/nature10350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gross MI, et al. Antitumor activity of the glutaminase inhibitor CB-839 in triple-negative breast cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014;13:890–901. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Asara JM, et al. In-Gel Stable-Isotope Labeling (ISIL): a strategy for mass spectrometry-based relative quantification. J. Proteome Res. 2006;5:155–163. doi: 10.1021/pr050334t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yao Y, Chu Y, Xu B, Hu Q, Song Q. Risk factors for distant metastasis of patients with primary triple-negative breast cancer. Biosci. Rep. 2019;39:BSR20190288. doi: 10.1042/BSR20190288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Palaskas N, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography marks MYC-overexpressing human basal-like breast cancers. Cancer Res. 2011;71:5164–5174. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hussein YR, et al. Glut-1 expression correlates with basal-like breast cancer. Transl. Oncol. 2011;4:321–327. doi: 10.1593/tlo.11256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Echeverria, G. V. et al. Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer mediated by a reversible drug-tolerant state. Sci. Transl. Med.11, 10.1126/scitranslmed.aav0936 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Lee KM, et al. MYC and MCL1 Cooperatively promote chemotherapy-resistant breast cancer stem cells via regulation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Cell Metab. 2017;26:633–647.e637. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bott AJ, et al. Oncogenic Myc induces expression of glutamine synthetase through promoter demethylation. Cell Metab. 2015;22:1068–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.09.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Park JH, Ahn JH, Kim SB. How shall we treat early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): from the current standard to upcoming immuno-molecular strategies. ESMO Open. 2018;3:e000357. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Emens LA. Breast cancer immunotherapy: facts and hopes. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018;24:511–520. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Alistar A, et al. Safety and tolerability of the first-in-class agent CPI-613 in combination with modified FOLFIRINOX in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: a single-centre, open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:770–778. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30314-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stuart SD, et al. A strategically designed small molecule attacks alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase in tumor cells through a redox process. Cancer Metab. 2014;2:4. doi: 10.1186/2049-3002-2-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Imbalzano KM, Tatarkova I, Imbalzano AN, Nickerson JA. Increasingly transformed MCF-10A cells have a progressively tumor-like phenotype in three-dimensional basement membrane culture. Cancer Cell Int. 2009;9:7. doi: 10.1186/1475-2867-9-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Moffat J, et al. A Lentiviral RNAi library for human and mouse genes applied to an arrayed viral high-content screen. Cell. 2006;124:1283–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Westerfield, M. The Zebra fish Book: A Guide for the Laboratory Use of Zebra fish (Brachydanio rerio) (University of Oregon Press, Eugene, OR, USA, 1994).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
We confirm that all relevant data and methods are included in the main Article and the Supplementary Information section. The source data for the graphs and charts in the figures is available as Supplementary Data file and any remaining information can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.