Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2021 Sep 15;27(58):14401–14404. doi: 10.1002/chem.202102732

Selective One‐Pot Syntheses of Mixed Silicon‐Germanium Heteroadamantane Clusters

Benedikt Köstler 1, Michael Bolte 1, Hans‐Wolfram Lerner 1, Matthias Wagner 1,
PMCID: PMC8596519  PMID: 34387917

Abstract

SixGey alloys are emerging materials for modern semiconductor technology. Well‐defined model systems of the bulk structures aid in understanding their intrinsic characteristics. Three such model clusters have now been realized in the form of the Si x Ge y heteroadamantanes [0], [1], and [2] through selective one‐pot syntheses starting from Me2GeCl2, Si2Cl6, and [nBu4N]Cl. Compound [0] contains six GeMe2 and four SiSiCl3 vertices, whereas one and two of the GeMe2 groups are replaced by SiCl2 moieties in compounds [1] and [2], respectively. Chloride‐ion‐mediated rearrangement quantitatively converts [2] into [1] at room temperature and finally into [0] at 60 °C, which is not only remarkable in view of the rigidity of these cage structures but also sheds light on the assembly mechanism.

Keywords: cluster compounds, germanium, rearrangements, SiGe alloys, silicon


Toward novel nanoclusters: The fourfold SiCl3‐substituted Si4Ge6 ([0]), Si5Ge5 ([1]), and Si6Ge4 ([2]) heteroadamantane cores are accessible directly from Me2GeCl2 and Si2Cl6/Cl in a time‐ and cost‐efficient synthesis. In a chloride ion‐mediated rearrangement, [2] is converted into [1] at room temperature and into [0] at 60 °C.

graphic file with name CHEM-27-14401-g002.jpg

Introduction

Bulk silicon is the materials basis of semiconductor technology. For the deposition of silicon thin films, oligosilanes have been intensively studied and used as volatile precursors. [1] Marschner's sila‐adamantane [A] is a substructure of bulk cubic silicon and a particularly fine example of a large, monodisperse oligosilane (Figure 1a). [2] The incorporation of Ge atoms into bulk silicon can lead to Si x Ge y alloys with unprecedented optoelectronic properties of exceptional promise. [3] To fully exploit the potential of this class of materials, deeper insight into fundamentally important phenomena, such as σ‐electron conjugation, [4] would be desirable and can best be gained by studying well‐defined molecular model systems. Apart from Kouvetakis’ perhydrogenated single‐source Si x Ge y precursors, which have been successfully used for the CVD of corresponding mixed semiconductors,[ 5 , 6 ] only few examples of complex (polycyclic) Si x Ge y oligomers are known to‐date, making a systematic assessment of their properties difficult.[ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ] In this regard, the neo‐Si3Ge2 structure [B] (Figure 1b) is noteworthy, which was obtained by the du Mont group from Me3GeCl and HSiCl3/NEt3 (Benkeser reagent).[ 15 , 16 ] The analogous reaction with Me2GeCl2 led to the double silylation product Me2Ge(SiCl3)2. Recently, our group succeeded in synthesizing germanide [C] from GeCl4 and the alternative trichlorosilylation system Si2Cl6/Cl,[ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ] which disproportionates into SiCl4 and the actual reactive intermediate [SiCl3]; treatment of [C] with AlCl3 gave the neo‐Si4Ge species [D]. [21]

Figure 1.

Figure 1

a) Solid‐state structure of Marschner's sila‐adamantane [A] (Si: blue, CH3: black). b) Schematic representations of the Si x Ge y oligomers [B], [C] , and [D].

Herein, we describe reactions of Me2GeCl2 with the Si2Cl6/Cl system and show that, in striking contrast to du Mont's results with the Benkeser reagent, three structurally defined Si x Ge y heteroadamantanes, [0], [1], and [2], become accessible in good yields, which can be regarded as long‐sought model systems of Si x Ge y alloys (see Figure 2 for the molecular structures and an explanation of the numbering scheme).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Syntheses of the Si x Ge y heteroadamantanes [0], [1], and [2] from Me2GeCl2 and the Si2Cl6/Cl system in CH2Cl2. Note that the reactions are catalytic in [nBu4N]Cl; in practice ca. 1 equiv. was used. The compound numbers [X] refer to the number, X, of SiCl2 vertices incorporated into the cluster core instead of GeMe2 vertices (ideal number of the latter: 6 in [0]). (i) 1: room temperature, 4 h; 2: removal of SiCl4; 3: 60 °C, 6 d. (ii) room temperature, 13 d, in‐situ crystallization from an unstirred mixture. (iii) room temperature, 6 d, with stirring. (iv) 60 °C, 2 d. (v) 60 °C, 4.5 d.

Results and Discussion

Syntheses and reactivities of the heteroadamantanes [0], [1], and [2]

All reactions were carried out in CH2Cl2 or CD2Cl2. Our initial experiments with Me2GeCl2, Si2Cl6, and cat. [nBu4N]Cl using the theoretically required stoichiometry for the formation of the Si8Ge6 heteroadamantane [0] (i. e., Me2GeCl2/Si2Cl6 6 : 16; see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information for the atom and electron count) gave the target compound in 20 % yield. Further optimization of the reaction conditions led to the following protocol for the synthesis of [0]: in a one‐pot procedure, a Me2GeCl2/Si2Cl6 6 : 24 mixture was first stored at room temperature for 4 h, evaporated to remove the released SiCl4, re‐dissolved, and heated to 60 °C for 6 d.

Heteroadamantane [0] then crystallized from the solution and was isolated in 40–45 % yield (see below for a rationale of the modified stoichiometry). Single crystals of a second heteroadamantane, the Si10Ge4 species [2], grew and were isolated after 13 d in 25–30 % yield, when a 6 : 24 mixture of Me2GeCl2/Si2Cl6 was stored at room temperature without stirring. Compared to [0], in [2] two GeMe2 vertices at opposite positions of the cluster are replaced by SiCl2 groups. A further increase in the crystallization time caused an increasing contamination of the crystal crop by a third heteroadamantane, the Si9Ge5 derivative [1], in which only one of the six GeMe2 vertices of [0] is exchanged for SiCl2. Marschner prepared sila‐adamantane [A], the close molecular relative to [0], [1], and [2], in a fundamentally different way by a reaction inspired by Schleyer's adamantane synthesis (8 steps from SiCl4 and Me3SiLi, 17 % overall yield).[ 2 , 9 ]

How are the formations of [0], [1], and [2] interrelated? While pure [2] is stable over weeks in CH2Cl2 at room temperature, NMR monitoring proved that a continuous conversion [2][1][0] is possible in the presence of [nBu4N]Cl (quantitative with respect to GeMe2 fragments; Figure S2): Reaction [2][1] already takes place at room temperature, whereas reaction [1][0] requires prolonged heating at 60 °C. This temperature dependence allows the selective synthesis of [1] from [2] in 50–55 % yield after workup (Figure 2). Isolation of [2] is thus only possible if [2] is allowed to escape rearrangement by crystallization. Upon going from [2] to [1] and [0], dichlorosilylenes (SiCl2) are extruded from the cluster cores and dimethylgermylenes (GeMe2) are incorporated. Formal cyclocondensation of 6 SiCl2 moieties would give perchlorinated cyclohexasilane, which was indeed detected by 29Si NMR spectroscopy in the form of [cyclo‐Si6Cl12 ⋅ 2Cl]2−.[ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ] The GeMe2 fragments, in turn, must originate from cannibalized heteroadamantanes [2] and [1].

The following conclusions can be drawn: i) the assembly of [0] most likely involves Si‐enriched [2] as a key intermediate, which explains why the best yields of [0] are obtained when the starting materials are combined in the stoichiometry theoretically required for the synthesis of [2] (Figure S1). ii) Since the sequence [2][1][0] cannot be reversed by heating of [0] with [nBu4N]Cl and SiCl4 or Si2Cl6, it apparently represents the downhill pathway to the thermodynamically most favorable species. iii) The reaction critically depends on certain properties peculiar to Ge, because the use of Me2SiCl2 instead of Me2GeCl2 does not lead to the corresponding Si14 heteroadamantane (Me2SiCl2 rather behaved as an innocent bystander of the Cl‐induced Si2Cl6 disproportionation [17] ).

X‐ray crystal structure analysis of the heteroadamantanes [0], [1], and [2]

Compound [0] crystallizes from CH2Cl2 as C 1‐symmetric solvate [0] ⋅ CH2Cl2. [27] The heteroadamantane cluster core is built of six Ge and four Si vertices, arranged in a perfectly alternating manner (Figure 3a). The valences of each Ge or Si vertex are saturated by two Me groups or one SiCl3 substituent, respectively. Thus, [0] combines the structural motifs of neo‐pentatetrelanes and (fused) cyclohexatetrelanes, both of which are frequently encountered in products of Si2Cl6 disproportionation (e. g., [cyclo‐Si6Cl12 ⋅ 2Cl]2− and Si(SiCl3)4).[ 23 , 28 , 29 ] The average Si−Ge bond length of [0] (2.395 Å) is essentially the same as that determined for SiGe alloy in the bulk phase (2.398 Å). [30]

Figure 3.

Figure 3

a) Solid‐state structure of [0] (Si: blue, Ge: purple, Cl: yellow‐green, CH3: black); Si8Ge6 core (left), complete structure (right). b) Schematic representations of [0], [1], and [2] with 29Si NMR chemical shift values given for comparison. c) Sections of the 29Si{1H} NMR spectra of [0], [1], and [2] in CD2Cl2. d) 29Si/1H HMBC NMR spectrum of [1] to prove the proposed structure containing 3 (2) magnetically inequivalent kinds of Me groups (quaternary Si vertices) in the molecule (CD2Cl2).

In the solid state, the molecules of [2] and [1] are located on a threefold rotation axis and a mirror plane, respectively. The GeMe2 groups are disordered with SiCl2 moieties. Structure refinement gave the best figures‐of‐merit when the sum of site occupation factors of all GeMe2 groups was constrained to 4 (rather than 5 or 6) in the case of [2] and 5 (rather than 4 or 6) in the case of [1] (see the Supporting Information for more details). X‐ray analysis thus supports the proposed molecular structures of [1] and [2], but the proof could only be gained in combination with NMR spectroscopy.

NMR spectroscopic characterization of the heteroadamantanes [0], [1], and [2]

The Me groups of [0] give rise to one 1H (0.91 ppm) and one 13C NMR signal (2.6 ppm); the 29Si{1H} NMR spectrum is characterized by two resonances at −83.4 (SiSiCl3) and 16.2 ppm (SiSiCl3; Figure 3b,c). The number of signals is in line with an average Td symmetry of [0] in solution, and the 29Si chemical shift values agree with those of the reference compounds [B] (−84.2 ppm, SiSiCl3; 17.2 ppm, SiSiCl3) [15] and Si(SiCl3)4 (−80.9 ppm, SiSiCl3; 3.5 ppm, SiSiCl3). [28] A 29Si/1H HMBC NMR experiment on [0] gave a pronounced crosspeak between the signals at −83.4 ppm (29Si) and 0.91 ppm (1H), in line with the direct Si(quart)−GeMe2 bond that is the principal interaction within the heteroadamantane scaffold.

Compound [2] (point group D 2d ) retains high symmetry and thus chemically equivalent Me groups, but the corresponding shift values, δ(1H)=1.03 ppm and δ(13C)=1.6 ppm, differ slightly from those of [0]. Three signals are detectable in the 29Si{1H} NMR spectrum, two of them (−81.0 ppm, SiSiCl3; 11.9 ppm, SiSiCl3) appear in the same ranges as the two resonances of [0], the third one is assignable to the SiCl2 centers (29.6 ppm; Figure 3b, c). Crosspeaks are observed between the GeMe2 and SiSiCl3 as well as SiCl2 signals in the 29Si/1H HMBC NMR spectrum of [2].

Compound [1] (point group C 2v ) shows three 1H NMR resonances with integral values of 6H, 12H, and 12H. The five signals visible in the 29Si{1H} NMR spectrum can be assigned to two chemically inequivalent SiSiCl3 units (−80.7, −83.3 ppm), two inequivalent SiSiCl3 moieties (16.2, 12.1 ppm), and one SiCl2 vertex (31.0 ppm; Figure 3b,c). Importantly, the SiSiCl3 signal at −80.7 ppm shows only crosspeaks to the two more intense proton resonances in the 29Si/1H HMBC NMR spectrum, whereas the signal at −83.3 ppm couples to all Me groups present in [1] and consequently corresponds to the two quaternary Si atoms that are linked to the unique GeMe2 group (Figure 3d).

Conclusion

In summary, time‐ and cost‐efficient one‐pot syntheses of Si8Ge6, Si9Ge5, and Si10Ge4 heteroadamantanes [0], [1], and [2] from the simple, commercially available building blocks Me2GeCl2, Si2Cl6, and [nBu4N]Cl have been disclosed. The clusters obtained are subunits of bulk cubic Si x Ge y alloys with the advantage of containing the two elements in different stoichiometries. Theory predicts that a Si10 cluster is already large enough to exhibit representative features of Si nanoparticles. [31] We therefore conclude that our Si x Ge y heteroadamantanes help to bridge the gap between small Si x Ge y molecules, such as [B] and [D], and more‐extended Si x Ge y nanoclusters. The effects of doping the adamantane scaffold with varying numbers of Si and Ge atoms have so far been studied only theoretically. Considerable consequences for the optoelectronic properties of the individual compounds have been predicted[ 32 , 33 , 34 ] and can now be experimentally confirmed (cf. optical band gaps of 4.35, 4.43, and 4.56 eV for [0], [1], and [2], respectively; Table S2). According to works of Tamao et al., [35] the all‐anti conformation of pairs of SiCl3 substituents in [0], [1], and [2] should result in pronounced σ‐conjugation, thereby rendering our heteroadamantanes suitable building blocks for the fabrication of Si x Ge y ‐based molecular wires. [36] The fact that [0], [1], and [2] carry exohedral SiCl3 substituents should be of benefit in this context. Thus, similar to the discovery of carbonaceous diamondoids and the elaboration of their remarkably high application potential,[ 37 , 38 , 39 ] the successful synthesis of [0], [1], and [2] is expected to pave the way to novel and useful Si x Ge y nanostructures.

Conflict of interest

B.K., H.‐W.L., and M.W. are inventors on patent application PCT/DE2021 100470 submitted by Johann Wolfgang Goethe‐Universität, which covers the synthesis and use of [0], [1], and [2].

Supporting information

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supporting Information

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Evonik Operations GmbH, Rheinfelden (Germany), for the generous donation of Si2Cl6 and GeCl4. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

B. Köstler, M. Bolte, H.-W. Lerner, M. Wagner, Chem. Eur. J. 2021, 27, 14401.

References

  • 1.M. A. Brook, Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 2000.
  • 2. Fischer J., Baumgartner J., Marschner C., Science 2005, 310, 825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Fadaly E. M. T., Dijkstra A., Suckert J. R., Ziss D., van Tilburg M. A. J., Mao C., Ren Y., van Lange V. T., Korzun K., Kölling S., Verheijen M. A., Busse D., Rödl C., Furthmüller J., Bechstedt F., Stangl J., Finley J. J., Botti S., Haverkort J. E. M., Bakkers E. P. A. M., Nature 2020, 580, 205–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Miller R. D., Michl J., Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1359–1410. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ritter C. J., Hu C., Chizmeshya A. V. G., Tolle J., Klewer D., Tsong I. S. T., Kouvetakis J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9855–9864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Chizmeshya A. V. G., Ritter C. J., Hu C., Tice J. B., Tolle J., Nieman R. A., Tsong I. S. T., Kouvetakis J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6919–6930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Klemmer L., Huch V., Jana A., Scheschkewitz D., Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 10100–10103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Lee V. Y., Takanashi K., Matsuno T., Ichinohe M., Sekiguchi A., Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2010, 24, 834–836. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Albers L., Rathjen S., Baumgartner J., Marschner C., Müller T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 6886–6892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Schnepf A., Chem. Commun. 2007, 4, 192–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Baines K. M., Mueller K. A., Sham T. K., Can. J. Chem. 1992, 70, 2884–2886. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Al-Rafia S. M. I., Malcolm A. C., McDonald R., Ferguson M. J., Rivard E., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 8354–8357; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 8504–8507. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Waibel M., Benda C. B., Wahl B., Fässler T. F., Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 12928–12931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wagner H., Baumgartner J., Müller T., Marschner C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5022–5023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Müller L., du Mont W.-W., Ruthe F., Jones P. G., Marsmann H. C., J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 579, 156–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Benkeser R. A., Acc. Chem. Res. 1971, 4, 94–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Teichmann J., Wagner M., Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 1397–1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Teichmann J., Bursch M., Köstler B., Bolte M., Lerner H.-W., Grimme S., Wagner M., Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 8683–8688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Georg I., Bursch M., Stückrath J. B., Alig E., Bolte M., Lerner H.-W., Grimme S., Wagner M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 16181–16187; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 16315–16321. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Georg I., Teichmann J., Bursch M., Tillmann J., Endeward B., Bolte M., Lerner H.-W., Grimme S., Wagner M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 9696–9708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Teichmann J., Kunkel C., Georg I., Moxter M., Santowski T., Bolte M., Lerner H.-W., Bade S., Wagner M., Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 2740–2744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Choi S.-B., Kim B.-K., Boudjouk P., Grier D. G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8117–8118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Tillmann J., Meyer L., Schweizer J. I., Bolte M., Lerner H.-W., Wagner M., Holthausen M. C., Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 9234–9239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Tillmann J., Moxter M., Bolte M., Lerner H.-W., Wagner M., Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 9611–9618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Teichmann J., Köstler B., Tillmann J., Moxter M., Kupec R., Bolte M., Lerner H.-W., Wagner M., Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2018, 644, 956–962. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Tillmann J., Meyer-Wegner F., Nadj A., Becker-Baldus J., Sinke T., Bolte M., Holthausen M. C., Wagner M., Lerner H.-W., Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 8599–8606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Deposition Numbers 2091220 (for [0]), 2091221 (for [1]), and 2091222 (for [2]) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service.
  • 28. Meyer-Wegner F., Nadj A., Bolte M., Auner N., Wagner M., Holthausen M. C., Lerner H.-W., Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 4715–4719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Tillmann J., Wender J. H., Bahr U., Bolte M., Lerner H.-W., Holthausen M. C., Wagner M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 5429–5433; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 5519–5523. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Dismukes J. P., Ekstrom L., Paff R. J., J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 3021–3027. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Shiraishi Y., Robinson D., Ge Y., Head J. D., J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 1819–1824. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Fotooh F. K., Atashparvar M., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 2019, 13, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Lehtonen O., Sundholm D., Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 045433. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Marsusi F., Mirabbaszadeh K., Ali Mansoori G., Physica E 2009, 41, 1151–1156. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Tsuji H., Terada M., Toshimitsu A., Tamao K., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7486–7487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Pichierri F., Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 421, 319–323. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Georgakilas V., Perman J. A., Tucek J., Zboril R., Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 4744–4822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Gunawan M. A., Hierso J. C., Poinsot D., Fokin A. A., Fokina N. A., Tkachenko B. A., Schreiner P. R., New J. Chem. 2014, 38, 28–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Schwertfeger H., Fokin A. A., Schreiner P. R., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1022–1036; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 1038–1053. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supporting Information


Articles from Chemistry (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES