Abstract
A geometrically constrained phosphine bearing a tridentate NNS pincer ligand is reported. The effect of the geometric constraint on the electronic structure was probed by theoretical calculations and derivatization reactions. Reactions with N−H bonds result in formation of cooperative addition products. The thermochemistry of these transformations is strongly dependent on the substrate, with ammonia activation being thermoneutral. This represents the first example of a molecular compound that reversibly activates ammonia via N−H bond scission in solution upon mild heating.
Keywords: ammonia activation, phosphorus heterocycles, pincer ligands, small molecule activation, sulfur heterocycles
A geometrically constrained phosphine bearing an NNS pincer ligand is reported. The steric and electronic parameters were tuned to allow for unprecedented reversible ammonia activation via N−H bond scission. The phosphine's electronic structure and the associated reaction mechanism of N−H bond scission are elucidated by derivatization reactions and computational methods.
The activation of polar small molecules for the synthesis of value added chemicals has been a point of interest in transition metal chemistry for decades. While transition metal complexes are capable of catalytically converting numerous small molecules through E−H bond cleavage, ammonia still represents a challenging substrate due to its propensity to form Werner‐type complexes, resulting in unfavorable coordination/activation equilibria.[ 1 , 2 , 3 ] In fact, to date there are only two transition metal complexes known, both Ir pincer compounds, that allow for the oxidative addition of NH3 to give isolable, terminal metal amido‐hydride species.[ 3j , 3n ] Main group species offer an attractive alternative to precious metals due to their higher crustal abundance, lower toxicity (in most cases) and reduced tendency to form unreactive ammonia adducts. While numerous examples of oxidative addition of N−H bonds to main group species have been reported over the last decade,[ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ] N−H bond splitting of ammonia still poses a significant challenge and reversible activation of this indispensable nitrogen feedstock close to thermoneutrality remains unprecedented in all of molecular chemistry.
Geometrically constrained phosphines have been shown to exhibit pronounced ambiphilic reactivity due to an accessible lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) featuring empty p orbital type character at the phosphorus center. This allows access to hydrido amino phosphoranes upon reaction with N−H bonds, as initially demonstrated by Radosevich and co‐workers (Scheme 1 A). [7d] However, the two‐electron oxidation towards phosphorus(V) renders these products thermodynamically overstabilized. A recent report by Kinjo and co‐workers showed that cooperative addition along phosphorus ligand bonds is also viable (Scheme 1 B). [7e] The presence of an enamine group in IV resulted in an isomerization to the thermodynamically favored imine V, which precludes the possibility of using this species in catalytic transformations. [8]
We set out to design a ligand to host a phosphorus center which is selective for the cooperative activation of ammonia over formal oxidative addition and does not undergo follow‐up isomerization. For this purpose, the asymmetric NNS ligand 1 was synthesized in a three‐step procedure starting from commercially available N‐phenyl‐o‐phenylenediamine in 62 % yield (Figure 1 A). [9] The reduced basicity of arylamines in contrast to alkyl derivatives and the presence of a sulfur donor is expected to benefit reversible N−H bond formation and disfavor the formation of phosphorus(V) species. Upon heating a mixture of 1, PCl3 and NEt3 in tetrahydrofuran, the geometrically constrained phosphine 2 can be obtained in almost quantitative yield. 2 features a chemical shift in its 31P{1H} NMR spectrum at +165.9 ppm. The molecular structure of 2 in the solid state shows a strongly distorted phosphine, with bond angles of the phosphorus atoms to the proximal ligands close to 90°, while the N1‐P1‐S1 angle is significantly larger (109.74(6)°, Figure 1 B). The P−N bond lengths (d P−N=1.7012(15), 1.7215(16) Å) resemble those of the related phosphorus triamine P(κ3‐N,N,N‐N{2‐NCH3‐C6H4}2) (d P−N=1.7014(14), 1.7190(13) Å). [7c] The computed highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) is delocalized over the ligand framework and the phosphorus center with the main contribution stemming from a p type orbital of the sulfur atom. In accordance with the induction of biphilicity upon geometric constraint, the LUMO mainly consists of an empty p type orbital of the phosphorus which allows for electrophilic reactivity towards substrates (Figure 1 C).
The effect of geometric constraint on the s‐orbital character of the phosphorus lone pair in 2 can be probed via formation of the selenophosphorane 3 upon stirring with an excess of elemental selenium in CDCl3 (Figure 2). 3 features a large phosphorus‐selenium coupling constant of 1 J P−Se=924 Hz indicative of significantly increased s‐character of the phosphorus lone‐pair in comparison to classical phosphines. [10] The molecular structure in the solid state shows a distorted phosphorus center featuring a P=Se bond length of 2.0643(7) Å (Figure 2 B) which relates well with the previously structurally related selenophosphorane P(Se)(κ3‐N,N,N‐N{2‐NCH3‐C6H4}2) (d P−Se=2.0718(11) Å). [7c] The low Lewis‐basicity of 2 is further demonstrated upon addition of B(C6F5)3 to a solution of 2 in tetrahydrofuran which does not lead to any observable changes in the 31P{1H} or 11B{1H} NMR spectra. However, when the solvent is exchanged for benzene a significant broadening and minor NMR signal shifts are observed in the 31P{1H}, 19F{1H} and 11B{1H} NMR spectra upon subsequent addition of 0.5 and 1.0 equiv. of borane suggesting an equilibrium reaction. Slow evaporation of the reaction mixture at room temperature yielded crystals suitable for single crystal X‐ray diffraction confirming Lewis adduct, 4, which exhibits a P−B bond distance of 2.0823(19) Å (Figure 2 C). When compared to 3, a minor elongation of the phosphorus ligand bonds (ca. 0.01 Å) is observed due to the different oxidation states of the phosphorus center. Coordination of the borane to the sulfur atom was computed to be thermodynamically unfavorable. [9]
Addition of one equivalent of para‐anisidine to a solution of 2 showed almost no conversion after 24 h, however when repeating the reaction with an excess of reagent (10 equiv.) cooperative addition along the P−N bond is observed as suggested by 31P and 1H NMR spectroscopy (5 a: 88.4 ppm, 2 J P−H=16 Hz, 5 b: 83.5 ppm, 2 J P−H=11 Hz, Scheme 2), while two electron oxidation towards phosphorus(V) was not detected. The incomplete conversion (66 %) of 2 towards 5 a/b when being exposed to an excess of substrate indicates an overall endergonic process. By analogy to the reported reactivity of P(κ3‐N,N,N‐N{2‐NCH3‐C6H4}2) towards E−H bonds, the observation of two isomers is rationalized by a hindered rotation about the N−C bond which results in slow conversion between 5 a and 5 b on the NMR timescale. The 1:2 ratio of the isomers observed by NMR spectroscopy stems from unfavourable steric interactions in the case of 5 a. [7c] Consequently, both isomers and the excess aniline exchange in solution as shown by 1H EXSY NMR spectroscopy. The endergonic nature of the reaction is confirmed by theoretical calculations which disfavour two electron oxidation of the phosphorus while cooperative addition is computed to be close to thermoneutrality.[ 9 , 11 ]
The reaction of 2 with ammonia in tetrahydrofuran resulted in the immediate and quantitative formation of the aminophosphines 6 a/b in a 1:1.1 ratio (6 a: 90.5 ppm, 2 J P−H=15.2 Hz, 6 b: 88.0 ppm, 2 J P−H=14.8 Hz, ν N−H=3398, 3320 cm−1, Scheme 2) in stark contrast to the reported reactivity of III. In the system reported by Kinjo and co‐workers ammonia activation is non‐quantitative over the course of 16 h with a computed activation barrier of (ΔG ≠ DFT =28.2 kcal mol−1). [7e] After removal of the excess ammonia, the phosphorus NMR spectrum shows reformation of 2 in small amounts (up to 21 %) accompanied by free NH3 which can be detected in solution. The reversibility of the ammonia activation at room temperature could be shown by reaction of 6 a/b with one equivalent of B(C6F5)3 which regenerates 2 and forms the ammonia borane adduct.[ 12 , 13 ] Exposing 2 to an ammonia atmosphere (i.e. an excess of ammonia) in the presence of B(C6F5)3 does not influence the formation of 6 a/b. Heating of 6 a/b to 60 °C in tetrahydrofuran under an argon atmosphere results in the regeneration of 2 (59 %) accompanied by the release of NH3. Upon cooling to room temperature, reformation of 6 a/b occurs. When heated in solution under a static vacuum full conversion towards 2 can be detected. [9] This represents the first report of reversible N−H bond scission and release of ammonia by a molecular compound triggered by heating without the need of further stimuli, for example, vacuum or addition of external reagents.
Recent computational studies have shown that multiple pathways for the cooperative activation of ammonia along phosphorus‐ligand bonds can be envisioned, depending on ammonia concentration, solvent and temperature. [14] By analogy with the results obtained for III, cooperative addition of ammonia along the P−N bond in 2 was found to be associated with an activation energy of ΔG ≠ DFT =22.0 kcal mol−1 in tetrahydrofuran at room temperature, rationalizing the significantly enhanced reaction rate when compared to III. [7e] In accordance with the observed reversibility in solution, the free reaction energy was computed to be essentially thermoneutral at room temperature and slightly endergonic at 60 °C: ΔG DFT (kcal mol−1)=−0.4 (25 °C)/0.6 (60 °C) (6 a); 0.0 (25 °C)/1.1 (60 °C) (6 b). Oxidative addition, producing the phosphorane 6 c, was computed to be endergonic (ΔG DFT=4.91 kcal mol−1) with an activation energy of ΔG ≠ DFT =56.0 kcal mol−1. The isomerization of 6 c towards 6 a in the presence of ammonia was calculated to be associated with an activation energy of ΔG ≠ DFT=28.7 kcal mol−1 and consequently not operative at room temperature. [9] Therefore, further possible mechanisms[ 7c , 14 ] for the production of 6 a from 6 c, were not considered. The relaxed surface scan of the N−H bond activation and analysis via intrinsic bonding orbital (IBO) analysis, [15] reveals that a planarization of the phosphorus center precedes the coordination of ammonia (Figure 3 B). The activation barrier for this bending mode, in the absence of ammonia, was calculated to be ΔG ≠ DFT =10.8 kcal mol−1 in tetrahydrofuran, which relates well with the experimentally derived value for the planarization of P(κ3‐N,N,N‐N{2‐N i Pr‐C6H4}2) (ΔG ≠=10.7(5) kcal mol−1). [7c] The adjacent donor atoms around the phosphorus center stabilize this T‐shape due to π‐donation into the empty p‐type orbital located at the phosphorus center. In a concerted σ‐metathesis mechanism the N−H bond of ammonia is being elongated and acidified by association of the nitrogen lone pair with the empty phosphorus orbital accompanied by P–Nligand bond cleavage (Figure 3 C). This allows for deprotonation of the coordinated NH3 by the flanking bisarylamide resulting in the formation of aminophosphine 6 a. [9] Although the P−S bond in 2 is comparably weaker than the P−N bonds, no suitable pathway for ammonia activation could be identified via DFT due to an overall highly endergonic process of cooperative ammonia splitting along the P−S bond due to the reduced basicity of the sulfur donor and the low bond strength of the resulting S−H bond (ΔG DFT=6.7 kcal mol−1).
With an endergonic and a thermoneutral N−H bond activation in hand, we set out to study the reaction of 2 with an electron rich alkylamine to obtain an exergonic and irreversible N−H bond activation. The reaction of 2 with HNEt2 resulted in the clean formation of the amine 7 a/b in a 1:3.7 ratio (7 a: 105.6 ppm, 3 J P−H=9.4 Hz, 7 b: 98.2 ppm, 3 J P−H=9.1 Hz, ν N−H=3401 cm−1, Scheme 2). The molecular structure of 7 b in the solid state (Figure 4) confirms the proposed structures of the N−H bond activation products. The diethylamine substituent features a planarized nitrogen atom (angle sum: 356°) indicating donation of the nitrogen lone‐pair into a σ* orbital. [7c] The formed 1,3,2‐thiazaphosphole exhibits a flattened structure with the N‐C‐C‐S moiety being strictly planar due to π delocalization in the aromatic system of the ligand backbone. When 7 is exposed to vacuum minor reformation of 2 is observed (1–9 %), consistent with an overall computed free reaction energy of ΔG DFT=−4.0 (7 a) and −3.3 (7 b) kcal mol−1 in tetrahydrofuran at 25 °C.
In conclusion, we report the synthesis of the new geometrically constrained phosphine 2 bearing an asymmetric NNS pincer ligand. The structural rigidity of the pincer scaffold results in a HOMO with pronounced s‐orbital character and a low lying phosphorus centered LUMO. The activation of N−H bonds was shown to result in cooperative activation along the flanking P−N bond of 2 with the overall thermochemistry being highly dependent on the amine used, with ammonia activation being instant, reversible and close to thermoneutrality in solution at room temperature. These results shows how geometrically constrained phosphines can be tuned to facilitate the thermodynamic parameters of E−H bond activation reactions that remain challenging for transition metal complexes and thereby open up new strategy for the catalytic production of organic molecules by small molecule activation reactions.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Acknowledgements
J.A. acknowledges the DFG for funding (AB 820/1‐1). O.P.E.T. and J.M.G. thank Shell Global Solutions International B.V., the EPSRC and the University of Oxford for financial support (Industrial CASE studentship O.P.E.T.). The University of Oxford is also acknowledged for access to Chemical Crystallography facilities.
J. Abbenseth, O. P. E. Townrow, J. M. Goicoechea, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 23625.
Contributor Information
Dr. Josh Abbenseth, Email: josh.abbenseth@chem.ox.ac.uk.
Prof. Jose M. Goicoechea, Email: jose.goicoechea@chem.ox.ac.uk.
References
- 1.
- 1a. Alig L., Fritz M., Schneider S., Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 2681–2751; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 1b. Hanefeld U., Lefferts L., Catalysis: An integrated Textbook for Students, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2018; [Google Scholar]
- 1c. Hartwig J. F., Organotransition Metal Chemistry: From Bonding to Catalysis, University Science Books, Sausalito, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Werner A., Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1893, 3, 267–330. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Selected examples of N−H bond activation of ammonia by transition metal complexes:
- 3a. Munarriz J., Velez E., Casado M. A., Polo V., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 1105–1113; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3b. Betoré M. P., Casado M. A., García-Orduña P., Lahoz F. J., Polo V., Oro L. A., Organometallics 2016, 35, 720–731; [Google Scholar]
- 3c. Brown R. M., Garcia J. B., Valjus J., Roberts C. J., Tuononen H. M., Parvez M., Roesler R., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6274–6277; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 6372–6375; [Google Scholar]
- 3d. Chang Y. H., Nakajima Y., Tanaka H., Yoshizawa K., Ozawa F., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 11791–11794; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3e. Gutsulyak D. V., Piers W. E., Borau-Garcia J., Parvez M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 11776–11779; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3f. Mena I., Casado M. A., García-Orduña P., Polo V., Lahoz F. J., Fazal A., Oro L. A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 11735–11738; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 11939–11942; [Google Scholar]
- 3g. Kimura T., Koiso N., Ishiwata K., Kuwata S., Ikariya T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 8880–8883; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3h. Kläring P., Pahl S., Braun T., Penner A., Dalton Trans. 2011, 40, 6785–6791; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3i. Khaskin E., Iron M. A., Shimon L. J. W., Zhang J., Milstein D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8542–8543; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3j. Morgan E., MacLean D. F., McDonald R., Turculet L., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14234–14236; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3k. Salomon M. A., Jungton A.-K., Braun T., Dalton Trans. 2009, 7669–7677; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3l. Fafard C. M., Adhikari D., Foxman B. M., Mindiola D. J., Ozerov O. V., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10318–10319; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3m. Nakajima Y., Kameo H., Suzuki H., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 950–952; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 964–966; [Google Scholar]
- 3n. Zhao J., Goldman A. S., Hartwig J. F., Science 2005, 307, 1080–1082; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3o. Kanzelberger M., Zhang X., Emge T. J., Goldman A. S., Zhao J., Incarvito C., Hartwig J. F., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13644–13645; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3p. Schulz M., Milstein D., J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1993, 318–319; [Google Scholar]
- 3q. Koelliker R., Milstein D., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 707–709; [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 1991, 103, 724–726; [Google Scholar]
- 3r. Casalnuovo A. L., Calabrese J. C., Milstein D., Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 971–973; [Google Scholar]
- 3s. Hillhouse G. L., Bercaw J. E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 5472–5478; [Google Scholar]
- 3t. Armor J. N., Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17, 203–213; [Google Scholar]
- 3u. Süß-Fink G., Z. Naturforsch. B 1980, 35, 454–457; [Google Scholar]
- 3v. Bryan E. G., Johnson B. F. G., Lewis J., J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1977, 1328–1330. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Recent reviews:
- 4a. Lipshultz J. M., Li G., Radosevich A. T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1699–1721; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4b. Greb L., Ebner F., Ginzburg Y., Sigmund L. M., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020, 3030–3047; [Google Scholar]
- 4c. Abbenseth J., Goicoechea J. M., Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 9728–9740; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4d. Kundu S., Chem. Asian J. 2020, 15, 3209–3324; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4e. Melen R., Science 2019, 363, 479–484; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4f. Brand A., Uhl W., Chem. Eur. J. 2019, 25, 1391–1404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Examples of group 13 compounds capable of ammonia splitting:
- 5a. Feld J., Wilson D. W. N., Goicoechea J. M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 10.1002/anie.202109334; [DOI] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2021, 10.1002/ange.202109334; [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5b. Abdalla J. A. B., Riddlestone I. M., Tifoin R., Aldridge S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 5098–5102; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 5187–5191; [Google Scholar]
- 5c. Zhu Z., Wang X., Peng Y., Lei H., Fettinger C. J., Rivard E., Power P. P., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2031–2034; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 2065–2068. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Examples of group 14 compounds capable of ammonia activation:
- 6a. Do D. C. H., Protchenko A. V., Fuentes M. Á., Hicks J., Vasko P., Aldridge S., Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 4684–4687; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6b. Reiter D., Frisch P., Wendel D., Hörmann F. M., Inoue S., Dalton Trans. 2020, 49, 7060–7068; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6c. Wendel D., Szilvási T., Henschel D., Altmann P. J., Jandl C., Inoue S., Rieger B., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 14575–14579; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 14783–14787; [Google Scholar]
- 6d. Protchenko A. V., Bates J. I., Saleh L. M. A., Blake M. P., Schwarz A. D., Kolychev E. L., Thompson A. L., Jones C., Mountford P., Aldridge S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 4555–4564; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6e. Usher M., Protchenko D. V., Rit A., Campos J., Kolychev E. L., Tirfoin R., Aldridge S., Chem. Eur. J. 2016, 22, 11685–11698; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6f. Alberto M. E., Russo N., Sicilia E., Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 7835–7846; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6g. Wang W., Inoue S., Yao S., Driess M., Organometallics 2011, 30, 6490–6494; [Google Scholar]
- 6h. Präsang C., Stoelzel M., Inoue S., Meltzer A., Driess M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 10002–10005; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 10199–10202; [Google Scholar]
- 6i. Meltzer A., Inoue S., Präsang C., Driess M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3038–3046; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6j. Jana A., Schulzke C., Roesky H. W., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4600–4601; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6k. Jana A., Objartel I., Roesky H. W., Stalke D., Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 798–800; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6l. Peng Y., Guo J.-D., Ellis B. D., Zhu Z., Fettinger J. C., Nagase S., Power P. P., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 16272–16282; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6m. Peng Y., Ellis B. D., Wang X., Power P. P., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12268–12269; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6n. Frey G. D., Lavallo V., Donnadieu B., Schoeller W. W., Bertrand G., Science 2007, 316, 439–441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Examples of group 15 compounds capable of ammonia splitting:
- 7a. Volodarsky S., Dobrovetsky R., Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 6931–6934; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7b. Robinson T. P., De Rosa D. M., Aldridge S., Goicoechea J. M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 13758–13763; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 13962–13967; [Google Scholar]
- 7c. Zhao W., McCarthy S. M., Lai T. Y., Yennawar H. P., Radosevich A. T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 17634–17644; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7d. McCarthy S. M., Lin Y.-C., Devarajan D., Chang J. W., Yennawar H. P., Rioux R. M., Ess D. H., Radosevich A. T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 4640–4650; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7e. Cui J., Li Y., Ganguly R., Inthirarajah A., Hirao H., Kinjo R., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16764–16767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kozuch S., Shaik S., Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 101–110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.See the Supporting Information (SI) for synthetic, spectroscopic, crystallographic and computational details. Deposition Numbers 2097495, 2097496, 2097497, and 2097498 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures.
- 10. Allen D. W., Taylor B. F., J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1982, 51–54. [Google Scholar]
- 11.The reaction of 2 with different anilines was also probed. However, reaction with aniline, para-bromoaniline, para-nitroaniline, para-tolylaniline and para-trifluoromethylaniline in benzene, toluene, THF or chloroform suffered from insufficient solubility of reagents or sluggish reactivity.
- 12.
- 12a. Mountford A. J., Lancaster S. J., Coles S. J., Horton P. N., Hughes D. L., Hursthouse M. B., Light M. E., Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 5921–5933; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12b. Huang W., Besar K., LeCover R., Rule A. M., Breysee P. N., Katz H. E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 14650–14653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.The mechanism of the reaction between 6 a/b and B(C6F5)3 has yet to be determined. Besides the release of ammonia, which would generate 2 and ammonia-borane, a stepwise abstraction mechanism is also possible, accompanied by the formation of [B(NH2)(C6F5)3]−.
- 14. Pal A., Vanka K., Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 558–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.
- 15a. Knizia G., J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013, 9, 4834–4843; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15b. Knizia G., Klein J. E. M. N., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 5518–5522; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 5609–5613. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.