Abstract
The major obstacle in applying peptides to intracellular targets is their low inherent cell permeability. Standard approaches to attach a fluorophore (e. g. FITC, TAMRA) can change the physicochemical properties of the parent peptide and influence their ability to penetrate and localize in cells. We report a label‐free strategy for evaluating the cell permeability of cyclic peptide leads. Fluorescent tryptophan analogues 4‐cyanotryptophan (4CNW) and β‐(1‐azulenyl)‐L‐alanine (AzAla) were incorporated into in vitro translated macrocyclic peptides by initiator reprogramming. We then demonstrate these efficient blue fluorescent emitters are good tools for monitoring peptide penetration into cells.
Keywords: RaPID, peptides, label-free, cell permeability, fluorescence imaging
Without a trace: Fluorescent amino acids ClAc−4CNW, ClAc−AzAla were incorporated into in vitro translated macrocyclic peptides by genetic code reprogramming. The minimally perturbing dyes were found to be good tools for tracking peptide penetration into cells by fluorescence imaging and flow cytometry.
In recent years cyclic peptides have emerged as promising drug candidates that can combine therapeutic benefits from both small molecules and biologics.[ 1 , 2 ] They show excellent selectivity and tight binding to their targets, and their ability to interact with shallow surfaces makes them suitable for tackling challenging surfaces such as those involved in protein‐protein interactions. [3] High affinity de novo cyclic peptides can be efficiently identified from enormous encoded peptide libraries using e. g. Phage or mRNA display platforms (108–1014 members). In particular the Random nonstandard Peptides Integrated Discovery (RaPID) system allows the identification of cyclic peptides containing a wide range of unnatural amino acids. [4]
One major challenge for the application of peptides to intracellular targets, however, is their low inherent cell permeability. Straightforward assays are therefore required to assess the permeability of promising leads, with fluorescence imaging being a popular approach. Typically, peptide leads are appended with a fluorophore (e. g. FITC, TAMRA, Rhodamine) to assess cell permeability. [5] Whilst widely used, these strategies use the labelled peptide as a proxy for the untagged version of the molecule. This can result in misleading findings where the fluorophore changes the physicochemical properties of the parent peptide and influences their ability to penetrate and localize in cells.[ 6 , 7 ] Use of minimally perturbing dyes or label‐free assays are therefore the gold standard for determining the cell permeability of cyclic peptide leads.
Recently, non‐canonical amino acids 4‐cyanotryptophan (4CNW) and β‐(1‐azulenyl)‐l‐alanine (AzAla) have been shown to be efficient blue fluorescent emitters.[ 8 , 9 ] Benefiting from their close structural similarity with tryptophan, incorporation of such molecules into cyclic peptides is potentially less disruptive to overall structure and permeability properties. Inspired by this, we set out to explore the introduction of 4CNW and AzAla into cyclic peptides by ribosomal translation. We selected the flexible in vitro translation system (FIT), which uses Flexizymes (small flexible tRNA acylation ribozymes) to prepare non‐proteinogenic acyl‐tRNAs using chemically activated amino acids.[ 10 , 11 ]
In a typical RaPID selection, the initiator is reprogrammed with an N‐chloroacetylated amino acid that readily undergoes peptide cyclisation with a downstream cysteine after in vitro translation of the linear peptide.[ 11 , 12 , 13 ] We designed compounds ClAc−4CNW−CME 7 and ClAc−AzAla−CME 8 to explore the inclusion of fluorescent amino acids into in vitro translated cyclic peptides via initiator reprogramming. The chloroacetyl (ClAc) group facilitates peptide cyclisation with a cysteine residue following translation, and the cyanomethyl ester (CME) acts as an efficient leaving group for flexizyme‐mediated tRNA charging. Amino acids 3 and 4 were obtained by enzymatically assembling 4‐cyanoindole (1) or azulene (2) with serine using a tryptophan synthase β‐subunit (TrpB) variant (Tm9D8*) developed by Arnold and co‐workers. [14] Treatment of 3 and 4 with N‐(chloroacetoxy)succinimide gave intermediates 5 and 6 in moderate yields. Finally, esterification of the carboxylic acids with chloroacetonitrile installed the CME functionality of 7 and 8 (Scheme 1).
With compounds 7 and 8 in hand, we set out to assess their tRNA acylation efficiency by using a tRNA analogue, the microhelix RNA (FAM‐MiHx_23b) (Figure 1). The FAM label allows for visualisation through in gel fluorescence and loading yields were calculated by densitometric analysis of RNA bands. Initial studies were carried out with ClAc−4CNW−CME 7 at pH 7.5. We observed a gradual improvement in acylation yields (33–39 %) as reaction time increased from 2 to 16 h. Altering the pH to 9 significantly improved MiHx charging, reaching 50 % after 2 h, but prolonging incubation time under these conditions did not further increase yields. A similar reactivity profile was observed for ClAc−AzAla−CME 8, with the higher pH giving the highest MiHx loading (50 %).
Using the optimised conditions (pH 9.0, 2 h) from the MiHx loading assay, substrates 7, 8 were charged onto initiator tRNAfMet CAU through eFx mediated aminoacylation (Figure 2a). The resulting conjugates were then supplemented to a Met‐free FIT system (PURExpressTM, Δaa, ΔtRNA, NEB). Synthesis of a model cyclic peptide P1 initiated with the fluorescent amino acids or ClAc−W as a control, was monitored by MALDI‐TOF mass spectrometry (MS). The translated cyclic peptide products were detected for both fluorescent initiators (Figure 2b). We noted a minor mass peak corresponding to the incorporation of methionine as the initiator was present for all translations (including the control with Cl‐W‐CME), presumably arising from charged tRNAfMet present in the commercial PURExpress kit.
We also investigated whether fluorescent amino acids 3, 4 could be directly incorporated into a model linear sequence P2 by mischarging onto the tryptophan tRNA by tryptophanyl‐tRNA synthetase. Amino acids 3, 4 were supplemented to a Trp‐free FIT system. MALDI‐TOF MS analysis showed successful expression of the 4‐cyanotryptophan containing peptide 4CNW‐P2, indicating good tolerance of 3 with tryptophanyl‐tRNA synthetase to allow efficient tRNA charging and subsequent translation (Figure 2c). However, consistent with a previous report, [15] attempts at incorporating AzAla 4 were unsuccessful, presumably due to failed recognition by tryptophanyl‐tRNA synthetase owing to ring expansion and removal of the indole amine.
We then explored the fluorescent properties of the in vitro translated peptide containing 4CNW. Translated reaction mixtures (10 μL) were run in a Tricine‐SDS PAGE gel and imaged with a trans‐UV 302 nm excitation light source. In‐gel fluorescence was observed for the translation sample with 4CNW, but not with tryptophan (Figure 2d) confirming that 4CNW is a highly sensitive fluorophore that can be detected in low quantities, such as those present in a 10 μL in vitro translation mixture. In‐gel visualisation of AzAla was not attempted due to a suitable excitation light source being unavailable. [15]
Finally, we assessed the potential of using either 4CNW or AzAla for biological imaging of peptides. Gai and co‐workers have previously demonstrated 4CNW as a satisfactory fluorophore for imaging by coupling to an antimicrobial peptide. [9] However, to the best of our knowledge, the use of AzAla in fluorescence microscopy has not yet been explored. To evaluate their suitability for tracking peptide penetration into cells, 4CNW/AzAla were appended onto the N‐terminus of a well‐characterized cell penetrating peptide, TAT‐NLS P3 (tryptophan was included as a negative control). Human bone osteosarcoma epithelial cells (U2OS) were incubated with peptides 4CNW‐P3, AzAla‐P3, W‐P3 for 20 minutes at a concentration of 50 μM in OPTI‐MEM. A moderate concentration (50 μM) of peptide was required for detection due to current limitations in the sensitivity of our microscopy system. Cells were then washed once with OPTI‐MEM and imaged on a Nikon Ti Eclipse inverted microscope with fluorescence excitation at 340 nm. An ET460/50 m single bandpass emission filter was used to image 4CNW‐P3 and a ET395/25x single bandpass emission filter was used to image AzAla‐P3. Our images show considerable intracellular fluorescence suggesting 4CNW and AzAla are suitable fluorophores for evaluating cell permeability of peptides when coupled with fluorescence microscopy (Figure 3a). We noted significant levels of cytotoxicity for all three TAT‐NLS peptides over longer incubation periods (e. g. 2 h), as measured by the release of lactate dehydrogenase (Figure S6). We envisage the cytotoxicity may be attributed to the combination of the TAT‐NLS sequence and the additional N‐terminal appendage, such that the evaluation of cell viability must be considered when combining these fluorescent amino acids with novel peptide sequences.
To validate the use of 4CNW in studying the cell penetration of de novo cyclic peptides, we also substituted 4CNW for an internal tryptophan residue in a recently reported K48 Ub chain‐binding cyclic peptide P4, identified using the RaPID system. [16] To assess if 4CNW‐P4 was penetrating cells, U2OS cells were incubated with 50 μM peptide for 24 h. Cells were then imaged by fluorescence microscopy using the same conditions as described above. As shown in Figure 3b, appreciable intracellular fluorescence was observed suggesting efficient uptake of the cyclic peptide, consistent with data previously reported. [16]
Flow cytometry has been widely used to study internalization of fluorescently tagged peptides in cells. Therefore, we wanted to explore the use of 4CNW for monitoring cellular uptake of peptides by flow cytometry. U2OS cells were incubated with 50 μM of 4CNW‐P3 or 4CNW‐P4 at different time points and the fluorescence of a single cell solution was measured. After 4 h incubation with 4CNW‐P4 we could detect a small percentage of positive blue fluorescent cells and this percentage was slightly increased at longer incubation times (Figure 3c, Figure S7). Incubation of cells with 4CNW‐P3 for 20 minutes was sufficient for initiating the detection of positive cells. These data indicate that flow cytometry is a good technique for monitoring the uptake of peptides containing 4CNW.
Label‐free assays are the gold standard for determining the cell permeability of cyclic peptide leads. Here, we report the incorporation of ClAc−4CNW and ClAc−AzAla into in vitro translated macrocyclic peptides via initiator reprogramming. In addition, we demonstrate 4CNW and AzAla are good tools for tracking peptide (linear/cyclic) penetration into cells. RaPID selections for de novo cyclic peptides initiated with ClAc−4CNW or ClAc−AzAla will enable the identification of peptide leads that are inherently fluorescent and can be directly assessed for cell permeability by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. 4CNW and AzAla have also recently been used to probe protein‐protein binding interactions by PET, FRET and VET.[ 9 , 17 , 18 ] We therefore also envisage that 4CNW/AzAla initiated peptide leads could be used directly in label‐free binding assays.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Francis Crick Institute which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK (FC001748), the UK Medical Research Council (FC001748), and the Wellcome Trust (FC001748). For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. We thank Matt Renshaw from the CALM STP in the Francis Crick Institute for assistance with fluorescence microscopy. We thank the Flow Cytometry STP in the Francis Crick Institute for assistance with flow cytometry.
Y. Wu, M. T. Bertran, J. Rowley, E. D. D. Calder, D. Joshi, L. J. Walport, ChemMedChem 2021, 16, 3185.
A previous version of this manuscript has been deposited on a preprint server (https://chemrxiv.org/engage/chemrxiv/article‐details/60c7584cf96a008f6f288de7).
References
- 1. Walport L. J., Obexer R., Suga H., Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2017, 48, 242–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Zorzi A., Deyle K., Heinis C., Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2017, 38, 24–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Doak B. C., Zheng J., Dobritzsch D., Kihlberg J., J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 2312–2327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Huang Y., Wiedmann M. M., Suga H., Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 10360–10391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lee J., Schwarz K., Yu H., Krüger A., Anslyn E. V., Ellington A., Moore J. S., Jewett M., Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 2661–2664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Birch D., Christensen M. V., Staerk D., Franzyk H., Nielsen H. M., Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2017, 1859, 2483–2494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hedegaard S. F., Derbas M. S., Lind T. K., Kasimova M. R., Christensen M. V., Michaelsen M. H., Campbell R. A., Jorgensen L., Franzyk H., Cárdenas M., Nielsen H. M., Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Moroz Y. S., Binder W., Nygren P., Caputo G. A., Korendovych I. V., Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 490–492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hilaire M. R., Ahmed I. A., Lin C. W., Jo H., DeGrado W. F., Gai F., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 6005–6009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Goto Y., Katoh T., Suga H., Nat. Protoc. 2011, 6, 779–790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Goto Y., Ohta A., Sako Y., Yamagishi Y., Murakami H., Suga H., ACS Chem. Biol. 2008, 3, 120–129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kawakami T., Murakami H., Suga H., Chem. Biol. 2008, 15, 32–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Yamagishi Y., Shoji I., Miyagawa S., Kawakami T., Katoh T., Goto Y., Suga H., Chem. Biol. 2011, 18, 1562–1570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Boville C. E., Romney D. K., Almhjell P. J., Sieben M., Arnold F. H., J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 7447–7452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Loidl G., Musiol H. J., Budisa N., Huber R., Poirot S., Fourmy D., Moroder L., J. Pept. Sci. 2000, 6, 139–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Nawatha M., Rogers J. M., Bonn S. M., Livneh I., Lemma B., Mali S. M., Vamisetti G. B., Sun H., Bercovich B., Huang Y., Ciechanover A., Fushman D., Suga H., Brik A., Nat. Chem. 2019, 11, 644–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Baumann T., Hauf M., Schildhauer F., Eberl K. B., Durkin P. M., Deniz E., Löffler J. G., Acevedo-Rocha C. G., Jaric J., Martins B. M., Dobbek H., Bredenbeck J., Budisa N., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 2899–2903; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 2925–2930. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Ahmed I. A., Rodgers J. M., Eng C., Troxler T., Gai F., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 12843–12849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.