Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.
Key Words: simple bone cyst, EWSR1-NFATC2, vascular malformation, bone tumor, hemangioma
Abstract
A simple bone cyst (SBC) is a cystic bone lesion predominantly affecting young males. The cyst is lined by a fibrous membrane and filled with serosanguinous fluid. EWSR1/FUS-NFATC2 rearrangements were recently identified in SBC. We here report exactly the same rearrangement in 3 lesions diagnosed as vascular malformations of 2 elderly patients. In total, through Archer FusionPlex, fluorescence in situ hybridization and/or reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction the EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangement was identified in 6 of 9 SBC, 3 of 12 benign vascular tumors, and none of 5 aneurysmal bone cyst lacking USP6 fusion. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, it was apparent that amplification of the fusion, as seen in EWSR1-NFATC2 round cell sarcomas, was absent, and that in the vascular tumors the fusion was present both in the lining cells as well as in the surrounding spindle cells. Of note, not all of the spaces in the vascular malformations were lined by endothelial cells. Aggrecan was positive in all cases but was not specific. NKX2-2 and NKX3-1 staining were negative in all cases. Thus, even though the overlap between the 2 entities is limited to the presence of few thick-walled cysts lacking endothelial lining in the benign vascular malformations, the spectrum of benign tumors containing NFATC2 fusions should be expanded and contains not only SBC in the young, but also vascular malformation/hemangioma in elderly patients.
Rearrangements involving EWSR1 or FUS and NFATC2 were recently shown to characterize simple (solitary) bone cyst (SBC).1 Two separate series have been reported and of 18 cases that were successfully analyzed, 11 cases (∼60%) showed NFATC2 rearrangement with either FUS (6/11) or EWSR1 (5/11).1,2 SBC is an intramedullary, usually unilocular, cystic bone lesion lined by a fibrous membrane and filled with serosanguinous fluid.3 This lesion predominantly affects the long tubular bones during the first 2 decades of life and is more common in males. The lesions can be asymptomatic, cause pain or swelling, or cause a pathologic fracture. Histologically, fibrous septations can be seen representing the wall of the cyst, with foci of chronic inflammation, multinucleated giant cells, myxoid change, and reactive bone. Typical fibrin-like collagen deposits are common. The lesions are not reported to have any specific immunohistochemical profile and the diagnosis is usually not difficult and made based on hematoxylin and eosin in correlation with clinical and radiologic findings.
The finding of EWSR1/FUS-NFATC2 rearrangements in SBC is remarkable as the same alterations have been reported previously to characterize a small blue round cell sarcoma, at the time referred to as Ewing-like sarcoma.3,4 Currently, the group of undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas of bone and soft tissue contains 4 entities; (a) Ewing sarcoma (characterized by fusions involving one member of the FET family of genes [EWSR1/FUS] and a member of the ETS family of transcription factors), (b) round cell sarcoma with EWSR1/FUS gene fusion with non-ETS family members (which includes NFATC2), (c) CIC-rearranged sarcoma, and (d) sarcoma with BCOR-genetic alterations.3 Round cell sarcoma with EWSR1/FUS-NFATC2 fusion manifests as a locally destructive bone lesion that may extend into the soft tissue, with a wide age range (12 to 67 y), and a strong male predominance. EWSR1/FUS-NFATC2 round cell sarcomas are composed of undifferentiated small to medium-sized round cells, with limited cytoplasm. These cells can be arranged in cords or small nests and the stroma can be prominent. Necrosis and mitoses can be observed. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells can show diffuse staining for CD99 in ∼50% of the reported cases.3 NKX2-2 and PAX7 can also be expressed5,6 and dot-like keratin or epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), focal WT-1, CD138, SATB2, p63, and smooth muscle actin (SMA) staining can be observed in a subset.5,7,8 Desmin, S100, synaptophysin, and chromogranin are negative.4,7–10 Thus, even though NFATC2 rearranged round cell sarcoma and SBC share the same fusion gene, any morphologic and immunohistochemical overlap is absent and their clinical behavior is entirely different.
More recently, 2 novel markers were identified for EWSR1-NFATC2 round cell sarcomas: NKX3-1 was reported to be moderately or strongly expressed in 82%, while other round cell tumors and a single case of FUS-NFATC2 sarcoma were negative.11 Expression was subsequently confirmed in 3 cases using a monoclonal antibody as well as at the RNA level.12 In contrast, Perret et al9 reported focal or diffuse staining of aggrecan in all cases, while NKX3-1 was negative in all 6 NFATC2-rearranged round cell sarcomas tested.9 Nothing is known about the expression of aggrecan in SBC, while 2 cases of SBC were negative for NKX2-2 and NKX3-1.2 Of note, expression of CD99, SMA, and EMA was recently reported in SBC.1
We here report that the same EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangement is also recurrent in benign vascular tumors. In addition to a series of SBCs occurring in the long bones of young patients, we describe 2 elderly patients presenting with vascular malformations carrying EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangement, which were multifocal in 1 patient. There was only very limited morphologic overlap with SBC. We show the presence of the fusion in both the lining/endothelial cells as well as the surrounding spindle cells. In addition, we evaluate the expression of recently reported markers (including aggrecan, NKX3-3, and NKX2-2). This way we further expand the clinical spectrum of EWSR1-NFATC2-rearranged tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Case Selection
Two tumors with EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangement were encountered in our routine consultation practice with the different clinical and histopathologic presentations. One rib tumor displayed the morphology of a vascular malformation (L6829), while the other was a cystic lesion in the femur of a young child (L6831). On the basis of the morphologic variation we proceeded onto an extensive query search from the archives of Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden for patients diagnosed with either SBC, aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC) lacking USP6 rearrangement, hemangioma of bone, or vascular malformation of bone. Vascular malformation cases in either bone or soft tissue were also retrieved from the archives of the Bone Tumor Reference Center in Basel, Switzerland. Including the 2 index cases, 7 ABC of 7 patients, 12 SBC of 12 patients, and 18 benign vascular tumors of 16 patients were investigated. The benign vascular tumors included vascular malformations (admixed thick and thin-walled large and small caliber vessels) (n=10) as well as hemangioma of bone (thin-walled vessels in the medulla of bone at typical locations in axial skeleton) (n=7). In addition, one of the index patients also had a spindle cell hemangioma previously. Detailed information of all 37 cases (35 patients) is listed in Supplementary Table 1 (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/PAS/B162). Surgical pathology specimens were routinely decalcified with formic acid. Frozen tissue was available for 15 patients. Slides were reviewed by experienced bone tumor pathologists (J.V.M.G.B., A.H.G.C., or C.D.S.H.). All samples were handled according to the ethical guidelines described in “Code for Proper Secondary Use of Human Tissue in the Netherlands” in a coded (pseudonymized) manner, as approved by the Leiden University Medical Center Ethical Board (B20.025).
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues were cut on DAKO glass slides (Agilent, S3003) with 3 to 5 µM thickness. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed using the Histology FISH accessory kit according to standard procedure (Agilent, K5799). Two types of the probe were utilized: either Kreatech EWSR1-NFATC2 t(20;22) dual-color single-fusion FISH probe for the detection of colocalization of translocated regions of EWSR1 and NFATC2 (Leica, KBI-10751) or using a split apart in-house designed bacterial artificial chromosome probe set: RP5-994O24 and RP5-1114A1 bracketing the proximal and distal regions of NFATC2 on chromosome 20, respectively, using an indirect detection system as described in detail by Szuhai and colleagues. Images were scanned using 3DHISTECH Pannoramic scannerP250 (3DHistech, Hungary) then visualized and scored in CaseViewer, version 2.3.0.99276 (3DHistech). The total number of nuclei counted varied from 43 cells to 431 depending on size and/or quality of the material. Translocation cases were considered positive when a translocation event was detected in at least 20% of the total nuclei counted.
Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction
RNA was isolated from frozen tissue, available for 8 of the 37 cases, using TRIzol (Ambion, 15596018), chloroform extracted, isopropanol precipitated, and resuspended in RNase-free water. Purified RNA samples were then DNase treated (Qiagen, 29254) and column purified (Qiagen, 74104). AMV reverse transcriptase (Roche, 109118) was used to synthesize 1 µg of total RNA into cDNA. Before real-time PCR (Bio-Rad, 1708886), cDNA samples were diluted 5× with milliQ water. Samples were run in technical duplicates. Primers used for EWSR1-NFATC2 and GAPDH expression are 5′-CAACCTCAATCTAGCACAGG-3′, 3′-AGTCCCAGAGGCTTGTT-5′ and 5′-TTCCAGGAGCGAGATCCCT-3′, 3′-CACCCATGACGAACATGGG-5′, respectively.
Anchored Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction FusionPlex
Cases that failed FISH were not processed for anchored multiplex polymerse chain reaction (AMP) analysis. The AMP system was used to amplify target-enriched cDNA libraries from FFPE and frozen tissues isolated RNA as described before.13 Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis of first-strand and second-strand was performed and a library of targeted cDNA was generated using Ion Torrent Archer FusionPlex Sarcoma kit v1 (Archer, Boulder, CO). This assay targets and identifies fusions of 26 genes associated with soft tissue tumors including EWSR1 and FUS. cDNA synthesis, thermal cycler settings, and sample reaction for each amplification step were carried out according to Archer FusionPlex Protocol for Ion Torrent. The readouts were analyzed using Archer Analysis software, version 6.2.3 (ArcherDX). The percentage of fusion reads were calculated based on the number of unique reads spanning the breakpoints and supporting the event, divided by the total number of unique reads that span either breakpoint. The quality of the fusion reads was assessed based on the following criteria; quantification cycle of real-time quantitative PCR (QC score) <32, a minimal total read number of 1.5 million a Fusion QC of >10 and >40% RNA reads as advised by the technical support of Archer.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry for all antibodies except aggrecan was performed using standard diagnostic procedures using the Omnis autostainer (Dako, Agilent). Depending on the type of antibody, antigen retrieval was carried out in either Tris-EDTA pH 9.0 or citrate pH 6.0. Details of antibodies dilutions, use of linkers, and other information are listed in Supplementary Table 2 (Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/PAS/B163). For aggrecan, 4-µm deparaffinized FFPE sections were rehydrated and endogenous peroxidase blocked. Antigen retrieval was performed with citrate, pH 6.0. Tissue sections were then incubated with antibody overnight at 4°C in 1:16,000 dilution. Detection was applied using immunologic Poly-HRP-GAM/R/IgG (VWR, DVPO110HRP) and Dako liquid DAB+ Substrate Chromogen System (K3468) as described.14 Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. Round cell sarcomas with molecularly proven EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangement, previously described as index cases, located in the femur of 16 years old male (L1857) and the humerus of 36 years old male (L1231) were used as control.4
RESULTS
NFATC2 Fusions Are Common in SBC and Vascular Malformation/Hemangioma
From the 12 SBC cases, 6 were found to carry an NFATC2 fusion (Table 1), while these fusions were absent in the ABCs that lacked USP6 rearrangement. For 3 SBCs and 1 ABCs, the material was insufficient for molecular analysis, probably due to prolonged decalcification. In 4 of the 6 SBC cases, the fusion partner was EWSR1. For the other 2, NFATC2 rearrangement was shown by FISH, but RNA isolation failed and there was no tissue left to do FISH for EWSR1 and/or FUS, so the fusion partner remains unknown.
TABLE 1.
Case No. | Case ID | Original Diagnosis | Age/Sex | Tumor Location | Tumor Size | Archer (Breakpoints) (% of Reads) | FISH (Fusion Positive %) | RT-PCR (Breakpoints) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | L6829 | Vascular malformation | Female/63 | Costa 5 anterior | 5 cm | EWSR1-NFATC2 (exon 7—exon 3) (19%) | EWSR1-NFATC2 (49.4%) | EWSR1-NFATC2 (exon 7—exon 3) |
L6952 | Sacrum lesion | 4.5 cm | No cDNA measured | EWSR1-NFATC2 (53.2%) | NP | |||
L6947 | Foot lesion | 1.6 cm | No cDNA measured | failed | NP | |||
2 | L6959 | Vascular malformation | Male/50 | Retrobulbar soft tissue | 3.0 cm | No cDNA measured | EWSR1-NFATC2 (36%) | NP |
3 | L6830 | SBC | Male/8 | Femur | Maximal diameter: 4.5 cm | EWSR1-NFATC2 (exon 6—exon 3) (40%) | NFATC2 split (20.2%) | No amplifcation |
4 | L6831 | SBC | Male/15 | Femur | Maximal diameter: 5 cm | EWSR1-NFATC2 (exon 6—exon 3) (8%) | Failed | EWSR1-NFATC2 (exon 6—exon 3) |
5 | L6861 | SBC | Male/9 | Femur | 2.5 cm at presentation, later 10 cm | EWSR1-NFATC2 (exon 6—exon 3) | EWSR1-NFATC2 (39.7%) | NP |
6 | L6863 | SBC | Male/8 | Femur | Unknown | No cDNA measured | NFATC2 split (24.4%) | NP |
7 | L7186 | SBC | Male/9 | Femur | 7 cm | EWSR1-NFATC2 (exon 5—exon 3) | — | NP |
8 | L6837 | SBC | Female/29 | Finger proximal phalanx digit 4 | Maximal diameter: 2 cm | No cDNA measured | NFATC2 split (51.2%) | NP |
NP indicates not performed.
Of the 16 patients with benign vascular tumors, 2 showed the presence of EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangement in their tumors. For 5 patients, the molecular analysis failed mostly due to prolonged tissue decalcification procedure. A summary of the molecular findings of the positive cases is shown in Table 1. Using AMP-based targeted NGS (Archer) for fusion analysis of 5 patients, we identified an EWSR1 (exon 7; NM_001163285)—NFATC2 (exon 3; NM_012340.4) fusion in case 1, an EWSR1 (exon 6; NM_005243.3)—NFATC2 (exon 3; NM_012340.4) in cases 3, 4, and 5 and an EWSR1 (exon 5; NM_005243.3)—NFATC2 (exon 3; NM_012340.4) fusion in case 7 (Fig. 1A). The percentage of fusion reads was above the minimal quality control as defined above. RNA was isolated from frozen tissue of 8 cases for reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplification spanning the region between EWSR1 exon 6 (NM_001163285) and NFATC2 exon 4 (NM_005243.3). Among the 8 cases, only 2 cases revealed amplification of the fusion transcript using RT-PCR confirmed by subsequent Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1B) (Supplementary Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/PAS/B162). FISH was carried out with either NFATC2 split (Fig. 1C) or EWSR1-NFATC2 (Fig. 1D) colocalization probes and was successful in 7 tumors, confirming NFATC2 rearrangement. No amplification of the signals was seen. The percentage of fusion nuclei was calculated and ranges from 20.2% to 53.2%.
EWSR1-NFATC2-rearranged Vascular Malformation/Hemangioma
Case 1
A 63-year-old female patient presented with pain on the chest at the Cardiology Department, without any other complaints. Diagnostic workup revealed multiple skeletal lesions, as demonstrated by bone scintigraphy showing increased uptake of the tracer in the rib, the spine, the skull, and pelvis (Fig. 2A). On positron emission tomography-computed tomography (CT) the lesions were mildly fluorodeoxyglucose avid. A conventional radiograph of the skull showed a well-defined osteolytic lesion with a central area of sclerosis. A conventional chest radiograph followed by CT demonstrated an expansile predominantly osteolytic lesion in the fifth rib on the right anterior side (Fig. 2B). CT study of the pelvis demonstrated lesions in the sacrum, iliac wings, pubic bone on the left and right ischial bone. These lesions were partially osteolytic and osteoblastic. On an magnetic resonance (MR) of the sacrum, the masses had a low to intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images and mixed low to intermediate to high on T2-weighted images, and surrounding bone marrow edema was visualized (Fig. 2C). Mild to marked enhancement was observed after contrast administration. Radiologic differential diagnostic considerations were metastases of an unknown primary tumor, brown tumors in hyperparathyroidism, and Langerhans cell histocytosis despite the rather advanced age of the patient. Subsequent biopsy of the rib was nonrepresentative, while the biopsy of the sacral mass showed a marked increase of vessels between the bony trabeculae (Fig. 2D) (L6952). Most of these vessels where thin-walled in a notable background of loose myxoid to more fibrous stroma with bland stromal cells. Focally, thick-walled vessels were present suggestive of a vascular malformation. Since based on the multifocality and the radiologic findings there was uncertainty about the diagnosis, a diagnostic resection of the rib was performed (L6829).
Evaluation of the gross specimen (Fig. 2E) revealed a sharp demarcated red to brown nodule of 4×3×5.5 cm, located in the medullary cavity of the ventral part of the rib. Cortical expansion with cortical destruction and soft tissue extension were observed. Resection margins were free from tumor. Histologic examination showed a well-circumscribed, noncapsulated lesion, mainly composed of large dilated blood vessels of variable caliber lying among preexisting trabecular bone (Fig. 2F). Blood vessels were lined by one layer of flattened, bland, and mitotically inactive cells. Most vessels showed a thin wall (Fig. 2G). Nuclear atypia and mitoses were absent. Very focally, smaller vessels with a more lobular architecture could be appreciated. Here, the endothelial cells showed a somewhat more abundant cytoplasm. No atypia was present. Immunohistochemistry for CD31, CD34, and ERG confirmed endothelial differentiation of the lining cells, although some of the spaces that showed a thicker wall were entirely negative (Figs. 2H–J, Table 2). At the background, reactive changes such as hemorrhage with hemosiderin-laden macrophages and reactive woven bone were seen. On the basis of morphology, including the admixture of small and large caliber vessels, a vascular malformation was diagnosed. Both the rib as well as the sacral tumor were shown to carry an EWSR1-NFATC2 fusion (Table 1).
TABLE 2.
Case No. | Case ID | CD31 | CD34 | ERG | EMA | CD99 | SMA | NKX2-2 | NKX3-1 | Aggrecan |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | L6829 | Weak | Mosaic† | Mosaic | − | Weak* | Mosaic | − | − | Mosaic |
L6952 | + | Mosaic | + | − | +* | + | − | − | Focal | |
L6947 | Focal | Mosaic | + | − | − | Focal strong | − | NP | NP | |
2 | L6959 | Mosaic | + | Weak | Focal | Focal | + | − | − | Mosaic |
3 | L6830 | − | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | + |
4 | L6831 | − | − | − | Focal | Focal weak | Focal | − | − | + |
5 | L6861 | − | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | Focal |
6 | L6863 | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP | NP |
7 | L7186 | − | − | − | + | + | − | − | − | NP |
8 | L6837 | − | − | − | − | + | NP | NP | NP | Focal |
9 | L1857 | Focal weak | − | − | Focal weak | + | − | Focal weak | Focal weak | +‡ |
10 | L1231 | − | − | − | + | + | − | Focal weak | Focal weak | +‡ |
Lining cells and stromal cells.
Some larger cysts are entirely negative.
Diffuse.
− indicates negative staining; +, positive staining; NP, not performed.
Interestingly, her medical record revealed a third vascular tumor, not in bone but in the soft tissue of the foot, resected 22 years earlier. The morphology was revised (L6947) but was slightly different from the lesions in the sacrum and the rib, and was suggestive of a spindle cell hemangioma, with numerous large dilated, thin-walled vessels lined by nonatypical endothelial cells, containing prominent phleboliths, admixed with focal spindle cell areas (Figs. 2K, L). Unfortunately, the molecular analysis failed. Three years later, the patient died of an unrelated cause.
Case 2
A 50-year-old male patient presented with progressive exophthalmos on the left side without significant visual impairment. MR image showed a well-delineated retrobulbar mass in the soft tissue measuring 3 cm in largest diameter which was subsequently excised with clear margins. Histologically, the lesion consisted of haphazardly arranged blood-filled spaces that were lined by a thin layer of endothelial cells (Fig. 3A). In greater magnification, the vessel walls appeared uniformly thin with only a few layers of smooth muscle cells, the lining cells lacked cytologic atypia and mitotic activity (Fig. 3B). Immunohistochemistry confirmed the endothelial differentiation (CD31 positive) and proliferative activity (MIB-1) was very low except for a few inflammatory infiltrates. The diagnosis of vascular malformation was made and the patient remained in clinical controls for >18 years without showing evidence of recurrent disease.
NFATC2-rearranged SBCs
Cases 3 to 7 were young boys (range between 8 and 15 y) presenting with a SBC in the femur (Fig. 4). In all cases, radiology showed an osteolytic, cystic lesion with fluid-fluid levels on MR with variable sizes and rim enhancement after contrast administration (Figs. 4A–G, Table 1). The radiologic differential diagnosis included a SBC and an ABC. In case 4, fibrous dysplasia was also considered. Histologically, all cases showed comparable morphology. Fibrous septa of variable thickness were encountered, which contained osteoid (Fig. 4H). Fragments of loose connective tissue with abundant eosinophilic “cloud-like” amorphous material were observed (Fig. 4I). Thin septations were lined by a layer of flattened cells, whereas thickened septa were more cellular, showed reactive changes with signs of bleeding and influx of inflammatory cells, and were lined by flattened to occasionally more enlarged protruding cells (Figs. 4J, K). Atypia and overt mitotic activity were not present.
Case 8 involved a 29-year-old female patient with a well-defined eccentric expansile osteolytic lesion of 2 cm in the proximal phalanx of the fourth finger of the left hand. On MR, the tumor was largely cystic with some strands of solid tissue. The morphologic evaluation revealed fragments of woven bone and abundant eosinophilic amorphous material. Focally, few septa were present with osteoclast-like giant cells and deposition of hemosiderin (Figs. 4L, M). Radiology and morphology were compatible with a SBC.
Mapping of the Fusion to the Lining Cells as Well as the Surrounding Spindle Cells
To identify the neoplastic cells in these benign lesions that were previously thought to be reactive, we carefully correlated the FISH results to the corresponding adjacent hematoxylin and eosin slides. In the vascular tumors, fusions were identified in both the endothelial lining cells as well as in the spindle cells in the stroma surrounding the vessels (Figs. 5A–C). We scored cells that line either the walls and the spindle cells in the stroma in various areas separately. In case 1, the fusion was much more common in the endothelial lining cells (27/37 nuclei, 73%) as compared with the surrounding spindle cells (15/42 nuclei, 35.7%), whereas in case 2, there was a more equal distribution (155/431 nuclei, 36% and 77/228 nuclei, 33.8%, respectively) (Figs. 5D–G). These findings suggest that in EWSR1-NFATC2-rearranged vascular malformation both the lining cells as well as the surrounding spindle cells are neoplastic. It was not possible to score lining cells and spindle cells separately in SBC.
Immunohistochemistry
To look for potential overlap in differentiation between the vascular tumors and SBC, immunohistochemistry using common endothelial markers CD31, CD34, and ERG was done (Table 2). As expected in SBC, vascular markers (CD31, CD34, and ERG) were negative; none of them displayed endothelial differentiation (Table 2). Interestingly, in the 3 vascular malformations, not all spaces were lined by cells expressing vascular markers; a mosaic pattern was seen in which some of the larger spaces with thicker walls were negative (Figs. 2H–J). On the basis of a recent publication indicating CD99, EMA, and SMA expression in SBC,1 we evaluated the expression of these markers in our series. While focal EMA expression was seen in SBC, this was absent in the 3 NFATC2 rearranged vascular tumors. Expression of SMA and CD99 was more variable in both entities. NKX3-1 and NKX2-2, 2 recently reported markers for round cell sarcomas, including those with EWSR1-NFATC2 fusion, were consistently negative in both vascular malformation and SBC in our cohort. Focal expression of aggrecan was found in all cases, and seemed to follow the mosaic pattern described above in the vascular malformations (Fig. 6). However, aggrecan staining was also observed in EWSR1-NFATC2 negative vascular malformation (n=2) and SBC (n=2). Thus, aggrecan is not specific for EWSR1-NFATC2-rearranged tumors and cannot be used as a diagnostic marker in SBC and vascular malformation.
DISCUSSION
In addition to EWSR1-NFATC2-rearranged round cell sarcoma and SBC, identical fusions also occur in vascular malformations of bone (Fig. 7). Three vascular malformations of 2 patients revealed EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangements. Only 6 vascular malformations of 5 patients could be successfully analyzed, suggesting a frequency as high as 50%, but further studies are needed. The high failure rate is probably due to the prolonged tissue decalcification procedure which is required as these lesions usually cause excessive reactive bone formation. All of 6 conventional hemangiomas of bone were negative. Moreover, since we primarily focused on vascular tumors of bone, it would be interesting to see whether the fusions are also recurrent in soft tissue vascular tumors.
One vascular malformation patient (case 1) presented with multiple skeletal lesions, 2 of which were histologically analyzed, diagnosed as a benign vascular tumor, and confirmed to carry the EWSR1-NFATC2 fusion. RNA analysis failed on one of them, so it was not possible to see whether both lesions had identical breakpoints in the fusion to confirm a clonal relation. The lesions were at distant sites (sacrum and rib, and probably also the skull) so it is unlikely that this reflects locoregional spread. Also, since both lesions did not show any sign of malignancy, it is also unlikely that they represent hematogenous metastases. It is well known that vascular tumors have a preference to affect multiple bones, which includes both malignant (epithelioid hemangioendothelioma) as well as nonmalignant (epithelioid hemangioma) tumors.15,16
Using careful mapping of the FISH results within the morphologic context, the EWSR1-NFATC2 fusion was shown to be localized in the lining cells as well as in the spindle cells in the stroma surrounding the spaces, suggesting that both of these are neoplastic in vascular malformations. It is therefore tempting to hypothesize that translocation is an early event occurring in a progenitor cell such as the mesenchymal stem cells that can differentiate towards a stromal fibroblast as well as to an endothelial cell.17 In vitro mesenchymal stem cell can indeed differentiate to endothelial cells.17
The presence of a gene fusion indicates that these tumors are neoplastic and that the term “malformation” is actually a misnomer for these specific tumors. Therefore, in line with the fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of bone and soft tissue tumors, in which lesions previously referred to as arteriovenous malformation in soft tissue, are renamed as “arteriovenous malformation/hemangioma” based on the presence of MAP2K1 gene mutations3 we propose to refer to the vascular lesions reported here as “vascular malformation/hemangioma with EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangement.”
Using AMP deep sequencing, FISH, and/or RT-PCR analysis, we also successfully analyzed 9 SBC, 6 of which demonstrated NFATC2 rearrangement (66%). This is in line with previous reports on, in total, 18 cases of which 11 (~60%) showed NFATC2 rearrangement.1,2 In our series, EWSR1 was the most common fusion partner (at least 4/6) which is a bit higher as compared with previous reports where FUS was slightly more common (6/11) as compared with EWSR1 (5/11).1,2 NFATC2 fusions were absent in 6 tumors previously diagnosed as ABC, and in which the characteristic USP6 fusion was lacking.18
There was limited morphologic overlap between the 3 vascular malformations/hemangiomas and SBC. The vascular malformations/hemangiomas demonstrated a mixture of thin-walled and thick-walled spaces of variable size. The amorphous eosinophilic cloud-like material that was frequently seen in the SBC cases, was absent in the vascular tumors. However, the lining cells in some of the cystic spaces in the vascular malformation/hemangioma, especially those displaying a thicker wall, lacked endothelial differentiation by immunohistochemistry, which was the only overlapping histologic feature between the SBC and the vascular malformation cases in our series. However, we cannot entirely rule out that this is artificial. Also, recently reported novel markers for EWSR1-NFATC2-rearranged round cell sarcoma such as NKX2-2 and NKX3-15,6,11 were negative in the vascular malformations/hemangiomas with EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangement and SBCs. Staining of aggrecan was variably and sometimes extensively positive in the vascular tumors as well as in the SBCs. However, staining was also seen in cases that were negative for the NFATC2 fusion, and hence it is not a good diagnostic marker.
While in SBC and in the 3 vascular malformations/hemangiomas with EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangement reported here morphologic features of malignancy are lacking, this is in sharp contrast to NFATC2-rearranged round cell sarcoma which are undifferentiated and clinically aggressive tumors, and thereby overtly malignant. Of interest, in round cell sarcomas, the EWSR1-NFATC2 fusion is amplified, which is obvious when FISH analysis is done using probes flanking EWSR1.4 Of note, in nodular fasciitis, which is a benign mesenchymal tumor known to spontaneously regress, USP6 rearrangement is a common finding, however, 2 cases with USP6 rearrangement and amplification of the fusion are reported to show malignant behavior.19,20 Amplification of the fusion was absent in all cases of the current series. This suggests that in addition perhaps to the cell of origin, also the level of expression of the fusion transcript, determines tumor cell fate and biologic behavior. Amplification of the fusion in a cell may enhance its propensity for tumorigenesis. EWSR1 is expressed in most cell types and has diverse roles in various cellular processes such as gene expression, meiotic and mitotic cell division.21 The N-terminal domain of EWSR1, which is usually retained during chromosomal translocation, was found to serve as a constitutive transcriptional activator to its fused partner.22,23 NFATC2 is a transcription factor with documented roles in the immune system.24,25 Dysregulation of NFATC2 revealed various effects from cell cycle regulation to oncogenic functions. A study using breast-derived and colon-derived cell lines provided evidence that both NFATC2 and NFATC5 promote carcinoma invasion through α6β4 integrin dependent pathway.26 Interestingly, in vitro study of NFATC2 demonstrated an ability to activate MDM2 oncogene independent of TP53 through direct binding to its promoter and in turn reduces TP53 activation and functions.27 Moreover, overexpression of NFATC2 has been demonstrated to function as an oncogene by promoting the stemness of colorectal cancer stem cells through the Hippo pathway.28 The fusion leads to a truncation of the N-terminal part of the NFATC2 protein resulting in a loss of the regulatory elements and phosphorylation sites, while the EWSR1 partner adds a nuclear localization signal allowing a constitutional activation of the transcription factor.4 As such, amplification of the NFATC2 fusion may result in the oncogenicity and aggressiveness of the tumor due to overexpression and gene dosage effect, however, the role of secondary changes involving any other coamplified gene cannot be ruled out. Therefore, further investigation is required to confirm this. A possible relationship between the level of EWSR1/FUS-NFATC2 transcripts and the tumor spectrum identified in sarcomas is depicted in Figure 7.
Of interest, a hemangioma of bone with EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangement was reported previously in a 32-year-old man presenting with 2 intraosseous vascular lesions diagnosed as benign hemangioma.29 NFATC1 is another member of the same gene family as NFATC2 and the functional effects may be comparable. EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangements have not been reported in round cell sarcoma or SBC. While the vascular malformations/hemangiomas with EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangement reported here also show the presence of thick-walled vessels, for the EWSR1-NFATC2 rearranged hemangioma the presence of only thin-walled vessels of varying caliber, embedded in a loose fibrous stroma is reported.29 However, no conclusions can be drawn as case numbers are very small.
It is not novel that identical gene fusions are found in different tumor entities. For instance, EWSR1 or FUS can fuse to ATF1 or CREB1 in clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue as well as angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma. Moreover, outside the soft tissues, these identical fusions can be found in hyalinizing clear cell carcinoma of the salivary gland (EWSR1-ATF1)30 or pulmonary myxoid sarcoma (EWSR1-CREB1).31 Clear cell sarcoma is a highly aggressive soft tissue sarcoma displaying melanocytic differentiation by immunohistochemistry, whereas angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma is a rare neoplasm of intermediate (rarely metastasizing) malignant potential containing nodules of epithelioid to ovoid cells arranged in syncytial-like sheets.3 Similarly, ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusions can be found in a wide range of tumor types, including congenital tumors (infantile fibrosarcoma and mesoblastic nephroma), secretory breast carcinoma, secretary carcinoma of the salivary gland, acute myeloid leukemia, and chronic eosinophilic leukemia.32–37
Thus, EWSR1-NFATC2 rearrangement is another promiscuous gene fusion that can occur in a wide array of tumors: not only in malignant NFATC2-rearranged round cell sarcoma (with amplification of the fusion) and benign SBC (without amplification of the fusion), but now also in vascular malformation/hemangioma in elderly patients (Fig. 7).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge Karin Kleiverda, Hans Baelde, and Panche Zdravkovski for excellent technical assistance, Robert Vink for providing a case, and Uta Flucke for useful discussions.
Footnotes
S.L.M.O. and K.S.: performed and analyzed FISH experiments. I.H.B.-d.B.: performed immunohistochemistry. B.E.W.M.A.: performed RT-PCR. L.S.W., A.H.G.C., K.S., D.B., C.D.S.-H., and J.V.M.G.B.: provided cases and/or reviewed clinical and histologic data. A.-M.C.-J. and B.E.W.M.A.: performed and analyzed anchored multiplex PCR. H.M.K.: interpreted radiologic data. J.V.M.G.B.: supervised the study. S.L.M.O. and J.V.M.G.B.: wrote the paper.
Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding: Supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (ZON-MW VICI 170.055 to J.V.M.G.B.). In the past, the Departments of Pathology and Cell and Chemical Biology, LUMC, received royalty payments from Kreatech/Leica for EWSR1/NFATC2 probes. The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article.
Contributor Information
Sheena L.M. Ong, Email: s.ong@lumc.nl.
Suk Wai Lam, Email: S.W.Lam@lumc.nl.
Brendy E.W.M. van den Akker, Email: B.E.W.M.van_den_Akker@lumc.nl.
Herman M. Kroon, Email: H.M.J.A.Kroon@lumc.nl.
Inge H. Briaire-de Bruijn, Email: I.H.Briaire-de_Bruijn@lumc.nl.
Arjen H.G. Cleven, Email: A.H.G.Cleven@lumc.nl.
Dilara C. Savci-Heijink, Email: c.d.savciheijink@amsterdamumc.nl.
Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen, Email: A.M.Cleton-Jansen@lumc.nl.
Daniel Baumhoer, Email: Daniel.Baumhoer@usb.ch.
Karoly Szuhai, Email: K.Szuhai@lumc.nl.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pizem J, Sekoranja D, Zupan A, et al. FUS-NFATC2 or EWSR1-NFATC2 fusions are present in a large proportion of simple bone cysts. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44:1623–1634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hung YP, Fisch AS, Diaz-Perez JA, et al. Identification of EWSR1-NFATC2 fusion in simple bone cysts. Histopathology. 2020;78:849–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.WHO Classification of Tumours Editiorial Board. WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, 5th ed. Lyon, France: IARC; 2020:3. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Szuhai K, Ijszenga M, de Jong D, et al. The NFATc2 gene is involved in a novel cloned translocation in a Ewing sarcoma variant that couples its function in immunology to oncology. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:2259–2268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang GY, Thomas DG, Davis JL, et al. EWSR1-NFATC2 translocation-associated sarcoma clinicopathologic findings in a rare aggressive primary bone or soft tissue tumor. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43:1112–1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Charville GW, Wang WL, Ingram DR, et al. EWSR1 fusion proteins mediate PAX7 expression in Ewing sarcoma. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:1312–1320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sadri N, Barroeta J, Pack SD, et al. Malignant round cell tumor of bone with EWSR1-NFATC2 gene fusion. Virchows Arch. 2014;465:233–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Diaz-Perez JA, Nielsen GP, Antonescu CR, et al. EWSR1/FUS-NFATc2 rearranged round cell sarcoma: clinicopathological series of 4 cases and literature review. Hum Pathol. 2019;90:45–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Perret R, Escuriol J, Velasco V, et al. NFATc2-rearranged sarcomas: clinicopathologic, molecular, and cytogenetic study of 7 cases with evidence of AGGRECAN as a novel diagnostic marker. Mod Pathol. 2020;33:1930–1944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bode-Lesniewska B, Fritz C, Exner GU, et al. EWSR1-NFATC2 and FUS-NFATC2 gene fusion-associated mesenchymal tumors: clinicopathologic correlation and literature review. Sarcoma. 2019;2019:9386390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yoshida KI, Machado I, Motoi T, et al. NKX3-1 is a useful immunohistochemical marker of EWSR1-NFATC2 sarcoma and mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2020;44:719–728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yoshida A, Hashimoto T, Ryo E, et al. Confirmation of NKX3-1 expression in EWSR1-NFATC2 sarcoma and mesenchymal chondrosarcoma using monoclonal antibody immunohistochemistry, RT-PCR, and RNA in situ hybridization. Am J Surg Pathol. 2021;45:578–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lam SW, Cleton-Jansen AM, Cleven AHG, et al. Molecular Analysis of gene fusions in bone and soft tissue tumors by anchored multiplex PCR-based targeted next-generation sequencing. J Mol Diagn. 2018;20:653–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Baranski Z, Booij TH, Cleton-Jansen AM, et al. Aven-mediated checkpoint kinase control regulates proliferation and resistance to chemotherapy in conventional osteosarcoma. J Pathol. 2015;236:348–359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nielsen GP, Srivastava A, Kattapuram S, et al. Epithelioid hemangioma of bone revisited: a study of 50 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33:270–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Campanacci M, Boriani S, Giunti A. Hemangioendothelioma of bone: a study of 29 cases. Cancer. 1980;46:804–814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Oswald J, Boxberger S, Jorgensen B, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells can be differentiated into endothelial cells in vitro. Stem Cells. 2004;22:377–384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oliveira AM, Hsi BL, Weremowicz S, et al. USP6 (Tre2) fusion oncogenes in aneurysmal bone cyst. Cancer Res. 2004;64:1920–1923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guo R, Wang X, Chou MM, et al. PPP6R3-USP6 amplification: novel oncogenic mechanism in malignant nodular fasciitis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2016;55:640–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Teramura Y, Yamazaki Y, Tanaka M, et al. Case of mesenchymal tumor with the PPP6R3-USP6 fusion, possible nodular fasciitis with malignant transformation. Pathol Int. 2019;69:706–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Thway K, Fisher C. Mesenchymal tumors with EWSR1 gene rearrangements. Surg Pathol Clin. 2019;12:165–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ohno T, Ouchida M, Lee L, et al. The EWS gene, involved in Ewing family of tumors, malignant melanoma of soft parts and desmoplastic small round cell tumors, codes for an RNA binding protein with novel regulatory domains. Oncogene. 1994;9:3087–3097. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fujimura Y, Ohno T, Siddique H, et al. The EWS-ATF-1 gene involved in malignant melanoma of soft parts with t(12;22) chromosome translocation, encodes a constitutive transcriptional activator. Oncogene. 1996;12:159–167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McCaffrey PG, Luo C, Kerppola TK, et al. Isolation of the cyclosporin-sensitive T cell transcription factor NFATp. Science. 1993;262:750–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bettelli E, Dastrange M, Oukka M. Foxp3 interacts with nuclear factor of activated T cells and NF-kappa B to repress cytokine gene expression and effector functions of T helper cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:5138–5143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jauliac S, Lopez-Rodriguez C, Shaw LM, et al. The role of NFAT transcription factors in integrin-mediated carcinoma invasion. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:540–544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zhang X, Zhang Z, Cheng J, et al. Transcription factor NFAT1 activates the mdm2 oncogene independent of p53. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:30468–30476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lang T, Ding X, Kong L, et al. NFATC2 is a novel therapeutic target for colorectal cancer stem cells. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:6911–6924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Arbajian E, Magnusson L, Brosjo O, et al. A benign vascular tumor with a new fusion gene: EWSR1-NFATC1 in hemangioma of the bone. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:613–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Antonescu CR, Katabi N, Zhang L, et al. EWSR1-ATF1 fusion is a novel and consistent finding in hyalinizing clear-cell carcinoma of salivary gland. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011;50:559–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thway K, Nicholson AG, Lawson K, et al. Primary pulmonary myxoid sarcoma with EWSR1-CREB1 fusion: a new tumor entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35:1722–1732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Knezevich SR, McFadden DE, Tao W, et al. A novel ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion in congenital fibrosarcoma. Nat Genet. 1998;18:184–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tognon C, Knezevich SR, Huntsman D, et al. Expression of the ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion as a primary event in human secretory breast carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2002;2:367–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Skalova A, Vanecek T, Sima R, et al. Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of salivary glands, containing the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene: a hitherto undescribed salivary gland tumor entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34:599–608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rubin BP, Chen CJ, Morgan TW, et al. Congenital mesoblastic nephroma t(12;15) is associated with ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion: cytogenetic and molecular relationship to congenital (infantile) fibrosarcoma. Am J Pathol. 1998;153:1451–1458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kralik JM, Kranewitter W, Boesmueller H, et al. Characterization of a newly identified ETV6-NTRK3 fusion transcript in acute myeloid leukemia. Diagn Pathol. 2011;6:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Forghieri F, Morselli M, Potenza L, et al. Chronic eosinophilic leukaemia with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion transcript in an elderly patient affected with pancreatic carcinoma. Eur J Haematol. 2011;86:352–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.