Skip to main content
Journal of Surgical Case Reports logoLink to Journal of Surgical Case Reports
. 2021 Nov 11;2021(11):rjab503. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjab503

Surgical radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter: which operation should we choose?

Fengjie Chen 1, Jin Gao 2, Chen Song 3, Zhiwei Wang 4, Hui Xiong 5, Ligang Ding 6, Ge Gao 7, Hongguang Fan 8,
PMCID: PMC8599057  PMID: 34804486

Abstract

The treatment of atrial flutter (AFL) in patients without structural heart disease (SHD) by transcatheter radiofrequency ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) and bilateral pulmonary veins has achieved good results. We report three cases of typical AFL treated by surgical radiofrequency ablation. One patient, without SHD, successfully underwent CTI ablation and cardioversion. The other two patients, with SHD, underwent CTI ablation, partial right atrial ablation and pulmonary vein isolation, but a normal sinus rhythm was not achieved. Therefore, standard maze IV surgery may be the best choice in patients with AFL and SHD.

INTRODUCTION

Atrial flutter (AFL) is common in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). There is no consensus on the surgical treatment of AFL because of its complex pathogenesis, and no relevant literature has been published. However, the pathogenesis of typical AFL is relatively simple, and physicians generally use interventional catheters to ablate the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), with good results.

We performed surgical radiofrequency ablation in three patients with typical AFL (Table 1). Two patients, with SHD, underwent CTI plus partial right atrial ablation and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), with cardioversion failure; the other patient, without SHD, underwent only CTI ablation, with successful sinus rhythm recovery. We report these three cases and summarize our experiences as follows.

Table 1.

Clinical data of the patients

Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3
Sex Female Female Male
Age (years) 54 69 55
Preoperative diagnosis ASD+ severe TR+ typical AFL RHD+ moderate MS+ mild MR+ mild TR+ mild AR+ typical AFL CHD+ typical AFL
Preoperative AFL duration (years) 3 5 1
SHD With With Without
Operative methods ASDR+ TVP+ LAAR+RFA MVR+ TVP+ LAAR+ RFA CABG+ RFA
Ablation route CTI+ Partial RA+ PVI CTI+ Partial RA+ PVI CTI
Preoperative cardiac rhythm (Fig. 1b) Typical AFL Typical AFL Typical AFL
Postoperative cardiac rhythm Atypical AFL Atypical AFL* SR

*Patient 2 recovered SR after surgery and reverted to atypical AFL on the fifth day after surgery.

ASD, atrial septal defect; ASDR, atrial septal defect repair; TR, tricuspid regurgitation; RHD, rheumatic heart disease; MS, mitral stenosis; MR, mitral regurgitation; AR, aortic regurgitation; CHD, coronary heart disease; TVP, tricuspid valvuloplasty; LAAR, left atrial appendage resection; MVR, mitral valve replacements; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; RA, right atrium; SR, sinus rhythm.

CASE REPORTS

The patients all underwent median thoracotomy, and cardiopulmonary bypass was established through the ascending aorta, superior vena cava and inferior vena cava. Bipolar radiofrequency ablation forceps (Medtronic, Inc., Michigan, USA) were used for radiofrequency ablation. The ablation route in patients 1 and 2 included bilateral PVI, the midpoint of the border crest of the incision in the right atrium to the midpoint of the annulus of the anterior leaflet of the tricuspid valve (Fig. 1a), the border crest side of the right atrium to the inferior vena cava orifice, and the tricuspid valve ring side of the right atrium to the front end of the right atrial appendage. Only CTI ablation was performed in patient 3.

Figure 1 .


Figure 1

(a) Ablation at the midpoint of the annulus of the anterior leaflet of the tricuspid valve; to avoid injuring the right coronary artery during the operation, the right coronary artery was freed, and ablation forceps were placed under it during ablation to ensure that the ablation line extended to the tricuspid annulus and was completely transmural. (b) The preoperative ECG of all patients showed typical AFL.

DISCUSSION

Typical AFL is a type of macroreentrant atrial tachycardia. The most common type of typical AFL is CTI-dependent AFL, in which electric stimulation is conducted around the tricuspid annulus in a large reentrant loop with the CTI as the lower boundary of the reentrant loop [1]. Atypical AFL is a narrative term for atrial tachycardia; its pathogenesis is complex and not yet fully clear. In general, atypical AFL is CTI-independent macroreentrant atrial tachycardia [1].

In typical AFL, the reentrant loop is mostly CTI dependent. Theoretically, most reentrant loops can be successfully interrupted by the ablation of a right atrial maze.

Patient 3, in whom only CTI ablation was performed, showed successful sinus rhythm conversion. Although typical AFL was interrupted successfully in patients 1 and 2, atypical AFL eventually developed. Additionally, even though PVI was also performed, we still failed to achieve a permanent sinus rhythm in these two cases. Related studies have also shown that after the successful elimination of a simple typical AFL by catheter radiofrequency ablation, 82% of patients will experience at least one new episode of atrial fibrillation (AF) during the follow-up period [2]. Mohanty et al. [3] reported that for patients with simple AFL without AF, adding PVI to CTI can increase the rate of sinus rhythm maintenance (71.3 vs. 60.2%). The short-term and long-term results are mainly related to the diameter of the left atrium; the larger the diameter of the left atrium, the lower the rate of success [2].

The two patients with SHD in this report had a long history of AFL, and CTI ablation plus partial right atrial ablation and PVI failed to restore the sinus rhythm permanently. The pathological mechanism of AFL caused by severe SHD may be more complicated than previously thought, which may be related to abnormal electrical conduction in different parts of the heart or to focal excitability [4]. The presence of SHD can also affect the distinction between focal tachycardia and macroreentrant atrial tachycardia [5], thereby affecting the choice of the correct surgical approach. AFL and AF have the same risk factors, such as valvular heart disease, cardiac insufficiency and hypertension. AFL and AF also have an inseparable relationship in terms of pathogenesis. Atrial electrical remodeling and anatomical remodeling are common triggering factors and maintenance matrices. Under certain conditions, AFL and AF can transform into each other [6].

In addition, although typical AFL has very stable electrophysiological and anatomical characteristics [7], the electrocardiogram (ECG) morphology is also regular. However, even if the ECG shows typical AFL, it is not necessarily CTI dependent [8]. There may be a reentry mechanism involving the left atrium, coronary sinus and other areas. According to our experience, in patients with AFL and SHD, even CTI plus partial right atrial ablation and PVI cannot cure AFL. Perhaps standard maze IV surgery is the only way to interrupt reentry beyond the right atrium and increase the rate of success.

In summary, in patients with severe SHD, even those with a stable typical AFL confirmed by ECG, to increase the success rate of the operation, a complete standard maze IV operation may be the best treatment strategy.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None declared. No medical ethics were involved in this study. All patients provided written informed consent.

FUNDING

Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline Construction Fund (No. SZXK019).

Contributor Information

Fengjie Chen, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen, China.

Jin Gao, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen, China.

Chen Song, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen, China.

Zhiwei Wang, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen, China.

Hui Xiong, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen, China.

Ligang Ding, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Ge Gao, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Hongguang Fan, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

References

  • 1. Calkins H. The 2019 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular tachycardia. Eur Heart J 2019;40:3812–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Voight J, Akkaya M, Somasundaram P, Karim R, Valliani S, Kwon Y, et al. Risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation and stroke after radiofrequency ablation of isolated, typical atrial flutter. Heart Rhythm 2014;11:1884–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mohanty S, Natale A, Mohanty P, di Biase LUIGI, Trivedi C, Santangeli P, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation to reduce future risk of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing typical flutter ablation: results from a randomized pilot study (REDUCE AF). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2015;26:819–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rogers AJ, Moosvi NF, Brodt CR, Narayan SM. Structurally-based electrical predictors of atrial arrhythmias. Int J Cardiol 2019;278:151–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Akca F, Bauernfeind T, De Groot NM, Shalganov T, Schwagten B, Szili-Torok T. The presence of extensive atrial scars hinders the differential diagnosis of focal or macroreentrant atrial tachycardias in patients with complex congenital heart disease. Europace 2014;16:893–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Waldo AL. Atrial fibrillation-atrial flutter interactions: clinical implications for ablation. Circulation 2007;116:2774–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Olgin JE, Kalman JM, Fitzpatrick AP, Lesh MD. Role of right atrial endocardial structures as barriers to conduction during human type I atrial flutter. Activation and entrainment mapping guided by intracardiac echocardiography. Circulation 1995;92:1839–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Barbato G, Carinci V, Tomasi C, Frassineti V, Margheri M, Di Pasquale G. Is electrocardiography a reliable tool for identifying patients with isthmus-dependent atrial flutter? Europace 2009;11:1071–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Surgical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES