Abstract
Protein-mediated DNA looping is fundamental to gene regulation and such loops occur stochastically in purified systems. Additional proteins increase the probability of looping, but these probabilities maintain a broad distribution. For example, the probability of lac repressor-mediated looping in individual molecules ranged 0–100%, and individual molecules exhibited representative behavior only in observations lasting an hour or more. Titrating with HU protein progressively compacted the DNA without narrowing the 0–100% distribution. Increased negative supercoiling produced an ensemble of molecules in which all individual molecules more closely resembled the average. Furthermore, in only 12 min of observation, well within the doubling time of the bacterium, most molecules exhibited the looping probability of the ensemble. DNA supercoiling, an inherent feature of all genomes, appears to impose time-constrained, emergent behavior on otherwise random molecular activity.
INTRODUCTION
Protein-mediated DNA looping is a ubiquitous regulatory process that compacts the genome and may regulate transcription, make DNA more, or less, accessible for replication and facilitate repair (1–5). For instance, effectively switching on or off genes of the lac operon in response to the availability of lactose is advantageous (6,7). One would expect molecules displaying regulatory looping to exhibit behavior typical of the ensemble, and such ergodic behavior should be observable on an appropriate timescale for cellular biochemistry. Yet, in the thermal bath of the eukaryotic nucleus, or prokaryotic nucleoid, molecular motion is random and the behavior of a molecule can only be described in probabilistic terms (8,9). Single-molecule experimentation allows fluctuation analysis (10–12) and has revealed very heterogeneous behavior of molecules (13–18). Measurements have shown that protein-mediated loops form and rupture stochastically, and the lifetimes of such loops span several orders of magnitude (19–22). Notably, different DNA molecules in the single-molecule measurements behaved very differently during observations over a time span of ∼30 min, comparable to the doubling time of Escherichia coli (23), the bacterium in which LacI-mediated DNA looping is physiologically relevant. Such heterogeneity seems ill-suited for biochemical reactions presumably designed to achieve a certain regulatory outcome.
Extending the interval of observation might produce a more homogeneous response (24,25), but other factors might also change looping dynamics to create similar homogeneity within a biologically relevant time interval such as the mitotic cycle. For example, the activity of biological molecules depends on their ionic environment (26) and bacteria like E. coli must contend with large variations in salt concentrations (27). In addition, there is evidence for subdiffusive behavior of biomolecules in cells (28–31). These complicate the identification of factors that tune looping dynamics, but it might be possible to identify such factors as those that produce time-constrained ergodic responses (32,33).
Nucleoid-associated proteins that are abundant in bacteria and are thought to decorate the bacterial genome, organizing and compacting the DNA (34,35), are among possible factors. The HU protein, an abundant nucleoid-associated architectural protein, seems a likely candidate, since knockouts and mutants profoundly modify the E. coli (K12) transcriptome (36,37), and it has been observed to facilitate protein-mediated looping, although not against tension (38). Alternatively, evidence that supercoiling might be important had already appeared in earlier reports of comparisons of LacI dissociation from linearized or supercoiled plasmids containing the O1 and O2 operators separated by 400 bp (39).
In the experiments described below, the distribution of probabilities of DNA looping mediated by the lac repressor was measured versus various concentrations of the HU protein and levels of negative supercoiling. The loop size was 400 bp, which is an optimal compromise of minimizing the separation between binding sites to favor looping and utilizing long enough DNA to overcome stiffness. Furthermore, 400 bp loops are common in bacterial genomes (40). Only supercoiling under tension significantly altered stochastic DNA looping to produce homogeneous behavior among a large set of molecules and on the timescale commensurate with the doubling time of the bacterium.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of proteins and DNA constructs
LacI was provided by Kathleen Matthews (Rice University). Escherichia coli HU protein was overexpressed in E. coli strain BE257recA (C600 leu, pro, lac, tonA, str, recA) carrying plasmid pRLM118 where the hupA and hupB genes are under control of the lambda PL promoter. To express and purify E. coli HU protein, the E. coli strain BE257recA/pRLM118 was grown in 4 l of terrific broth containing 50 μg/ml of ampicillin at 30°C with vigorous aeration to OD595 reaching ∼0.7, and then switched to 42°C by adding 500 ml of 66°C terrific broth per liter and grown for an additional 50 min at 42°C. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6000 rpm at 4°C for 15 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the cell pellet was resuspended in a cold cell lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES–KOH, pH 7.6, 1 M KCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.25 mg/ml lysozyme and 1 mM PMSF). The cells in the cold buffer were incubated on ice for 1 h, then frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in a −80°C freezer. On the following day, the E. coli cells were thawed in a 4°C water bath. After the thawing, the cell lysate was sonicated on ice six times at 30 W with 2-min interval between each sonication and centrifugated at 18 000 rpm for 60 min. The supernatant was dialyzed against buffer A (25 mM HEPES–KOH, pH 7.6, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.25 mg/ml lysozyme, 10% glycerol and 1 mM PMSF) overnight and then loaded onto a 40 ml SP Sepharose FF column equilibrated with buffer A. The HU protein was eluted with a 300 ml NaCl gradient of 0.1–0.6 M NaCl in buffer A. The peak fractions were pooled, dialyzed against buffer A overnight and loaded onto a DNA-cellulose column. The HU protein was eluted with a 300 ml NaCl gradient of 0.1–0.6 M NaCl in buffer A. The purity of E. coli HU protein was monitored using 20% SDS-PAGE and the concentration was determined using the Lowry assay (Bio-Rad). The purified E. coli HU protein is free of nuclease contaminations as determined in the Leng laboratory.
DNA constructs (Supplementary Figure S1) were built similarly to others previously described (38). All DNA fragments for tethered particle motion (TPM) experiments were amplified by PCR using pO1O2 (41) or pZV_21_400 (42) plasmids, as templates, digoxigenin- and biotin-labeled sense and antisense primers (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, or Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2), dNTPs (Fermentas–Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Pittsburgh, PA) and Taq DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). The final 831-bp-long DNA amplicons contained centrally located O1 and O2 operators separated by 400 bp (O1-400-O2 DNA; Supplementary Figure S1A).
DNA tethers used in the magnetic tweezer (MT) measurements were built by amplifying a 3352-, 2115- or 2011-bp-long main fragment containing the O1-400-O2 segment in the middle (Supplementary Figure S1B) and using T7 ligase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) to attach ∼150-bp-long multiply digoxigenin-, or biotin-, labeled DNA fragments at opposite ends. These termini were necessary to securely attach one end of the main DNA fragment to an anti-digoxigenin-coated, flow-chamber surface and the other end to a streptavidin-coated bead.
The main fragments were amplified with a dNTP mix (Fermentas–Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Pittsburgh, PA) and a forward primer containing an ApaI restriction site paired with a reverse primer containing an XmaI restriction site. A double digestion of the amplicon with ApaI and XmaI was purified prior to ligation. Approximately 150-bp biotin- or digoxigenin-labeled DNA anchor fragments were generated by ApaI or XmaI restriction in the middle of 302-bp PCR amplicons produced using dATP, dCTP, dGTP, dTTP (Fermentas–Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Pittsburgh, PA) and digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Roche Life Science, Indianapolis, IN) or biotin-11-dUTP (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) in a molar ratio of 1:1:1:0.7:0.3. The product of ligation of the main fragment and two anchor fragments was purified and the total variation in DNA tether length, due to random placement of 30% biotin or digoxigenin along the anchor fragments, did not exceed 50 bp (16 nm) (38).
Details about template and primers that were used to generate the TPM and MT DNA constructs are summarized in Supplementary Table S1.
Microchamber preparation
Parafilm gaskets were fashioned with a laser cutter (VLS 860, Universal Laser Systems, Middletown, CT) supported on microscope slides, and coverslips were placed on top. Each gasket included inlet and outlet reservoirs positioned just beyond the edges of the coverslip and connected through narrow inlet and outlet channels to the central observation area. The assembly was heated briefly on a hot plate at the minimum setting to seal the components together. The narrow channels reduced evaporation of buffer, while nonhomogeneous flow through the triangular shape of the observation area produced a gradient of tether densities. DNA tethers in
buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4, 200 mM KCl, 5% DMSO, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mg/ml α-casein; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) were introduced into the chamber and attached through a single digoxigenin (TPM) or a multiply digoxigenin-labeled tail (MT) to the coverslip coated with anti-digoxigenin (Roche Life Science, Indianapolis, IN). The opposite end of the DNA was attached to a streptavidin-coated bead via a single biotin (TPM) or a multiply biotin-labeled tail (MT).
The beads used in TPM measurements were 0.32 μm diameter, streptavidin-coated polystyrene beads (Spherotech, Lake Forest, IL), while the beads used in MT measurements were 1.0 μm diameter, streptavidin-coated superparamagnetic beads (Dynabead MyOne Streptavidin T1, Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY).
TPM experiments
All TPM experiments were conducted in
buffer at room temperature. The LacI protein was introduced into the chamber before recording for ∼30 min or longer. For long experiments (up to 5 h), after adding the LacI protein the inlet and outlet of the chamber were sealed with grease to avoid evaporation.
A Leica DM LB-100 microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) with an oil-immersion objective (63×, NA 0.6–1.4) and differential interference contrast optics was used to observe tethered beads with a CV-A60 video camera (JAI, Copenhagen, Denmark). The absolute XY positions of each bead were recorded at 50 Hz with a custom LabVIEW (National Instruments, Austin, TX) program. Vibrational or mechanical drift in the position of each tethered bead was removed by subtracting the average position of multiple, stuck reference bead(s) within the same field of view (43,44). The excursion of each tether was then calculated as
, in which
are 8-s moving averages representing the coordinates of the anchor point of a bead. Changes in the excursion of the bead reflect conformational (length) changes of the DNA tether (45–47).
The beads that exhibited (x, y) position distributions with a ratio of the major to minor axes of >1.07 were discarded (∼20–30%), since they were likely to be tethered by multiple DNA molecules (44). The excursion data from the time records of the beads, in the same experimental conditions, which passed this ‘symmetry test’ were pooled to generate probability distribution histograms. These summarized the average excursion distribution and, in the presence of LacI, included three peaks (two looped states and one unlooped state) (38). The histogram of each selected temporal trace was fitted with three Gaussians, and then the looping probability was calculated by dividing the area under the Gaussians corresponding to the two looped states (peaks with shorter excursion) by the total area under all three Gaussians. The mean value of looping probability under each protein condition was weighted by the length of each trace.
MT experiments
The permanent magnets used in an MT can move vertically along and rotate around the optical axis of the microscope to change the tension, or torsion, on the beads, and thus twist the DNA tethers. The hardware, as well as the bead tracking algorithms, has been previously described (42). Briefly, prior to the start of an experiment, a piezoelectrically controlled objective scanner is used to vary the focus and record a series of images of beads in a field of view. The diffraction patterns of the beads change size as a function of focus and constitute a lookup table that can be used to determine the z position. Then, during the course of an experiment with a stationary objective, the x and y coordinates are determined using the radial symmetry of the diffraction patterns of the beads. Those same patterns are matched to entries in the focal stack that they most closely resemble, yielding the z position. The extension of each DNA tether is calculated using the distance between an immobile reference bead attached to the surface and a tethered bead exhibiting Brownian excursions. Stretching DNA tethers under high tension (∼2 pN) extends a 2115- or 2011-bp DNA template to ∼0.7 or 0.67 μm, which was used to identify tethers with acceptable contour lengths. Twisting DNA tethers to record an extension versus twist curve identifies beads tethered by single DNA molecules for inclusion in the analysis. Selected tethers were recorded for 3 min under three different levels of tension (0.25, 0.45 or 0.75 pN) and at a series of twist settings to determine the DNA extension in each condition before adding LacI protein. After introducing 1 nM LacI protein, x, y, z and t data were recorded for 20 min at each selected tension and twist setting. The DNA extension versus time data were then analyzed to identify probable looping events and calculate looping probability (38).
The position versus time records for each bead were taken holding the magnet at an integral number of turns. However, since there were multiple number of tethers in a field of view, the torsionally relaxed state of each DNA tether was not synchronized with the initial ‘zero’ rotation of the magnet. Thus, the torsionally relaxed state of DNA molecule was obtained by fitting the extension versus twist curve for each molecule with a parabola (Supplementary Figure S2). Then, the effective number of turns applied to a DNA molecule was calculated by subtracting the center of the extension versus twist curve from the turns introduced with the magnet. Finally, the supercoiling density was calculated as the effective number of turns divided by the twist of a torsionally relaxed DNA (number of base pairs/helical pitch).
Looping probability distributions as a function of observation periods
For individual tethers, the duration of looped (
) and unlooped (
) states was determined using the total variation denoising algorithm (48), and the looping probability was calculated as
. When the time series was divided into shorter intervals, the looping probability was calculated as
, where
refers to the sum within a time interval T. Five-hour-long TPM measurements were subdivided into intervals of 10, 20, 40, 60, 80 or 100 min. Twenty-minute-long MT records were subdivided into intervals of 2, 5, 10, 12, 15 or 18 min. Distributions of
and P were processed with the ‘ecdf’ function of MATLAB to obtain the empirical cumulative distribution of looping probabilities for each time interval.
RESULTS
Previous work has shown that the probability of LacI-mediated looping in torsionally unconstrained DNA molecules with two LacI binding sites (operators) depends on the protein concentration (38). When LacI concentration is low, neither operator may be occupied by a LacI tetramer, the looping probability is low, so the DNA tether remains extended, and the attached bead exhibits large excursions. When the concentration is high, both operators become occupied by tetramers that, not being able to bind to each other, cannot form loops. Excursions are large for beads attached to these tethers as well. Only at intermediate concentrations, in which one tetramer may bridge two operators, does the probability of looping increase significantly. When loops form, the tether is less extended, and the excursions of the attached bead are restricted. Average looping probability, calculated as the time spent in the looped state over the total observation time, is indicated by crosses in Figure 1, which summarizes ∼30-min-long TPM (19,44,45) measurements of LacI-mediated DNA looping between the strong O1 and weaker O2 operators separated by 400 bp (38).
Figure 1.

The looping probabilities of different DNA tethers vary widely. (A) The calculated looping probabilities of individual tethers exposed to a range of LacI concentrations are summarized in a box–whisker plot. The whiskers span the entire range of probabilities of the ensemble of DNA tethers monitored in each condition. As the LacI concentration was titrated from 0 to 20 nM, the looping probability increased from 0 to ∼45 and then fell again to 0 when repressor molecules saturated the binding sites. Note, however, that at each concentration of LacI, the looping probabilities based on 30-min observations varied from 0% to 100%. The upper and lower borders of the boxes indicate the upper and lower quartiles, respectively. The midline and cross of each box indicate the median and average of the distribution of looping probabilities, respectively. Schematic diagrams of prevalent DNA/LacI configurations are depicted below their corresponding LacI concentrations. (B) Representative temporal records of the TPM excursion parameter
with 0.5 nM LacI are ranked by looping probability from 0 (top) to 1 (bottom). Unlooped states have larger excursions (tall/red signal) and looped states have narrower excursions (short/blue and green signal). The actual
values are encoded using the color scale at right.
Although the average behavior of the population of DNA tethers is clear and follows expectation, the looping probabilities of individual DNA tethers under any given LacI concentration are very heterogeneous. Indeed, the whiskers of each box in Figure 1A range from 0% to 100% looping probability. Raw data displaying this behavior are shown in representative temporal records for DNA tethers exposed to 0.5 nM LacI (Figure 1B). Each time record corresponds to a different DNA tether. Unlooped states have a larger excursion (tall/red signal), and looped states have a smaller excursion (short/blue and green) (49). Clearly, loop formation and breakdown occur randomly. However, some tethers are never looped, some are always looped and some toggle between looped and unlooped states with various degrees of probability.
To verify that the heterogeneity observed was indeed due to the activity of single lac repressors and not variations among DNA molecules introduced during PCR, a control experiment was performed in which excursions of the tethered beads were monitored for 30 min, and then the first solution containing LacI was washed away with
buffer supplemented with high salt concentration (1 M KCl). To verify washing, the excursions of the same tethered beads were then monitored for 20 min in which no looping was observed. Finally, an identical solution of protein was introduced into the microchamber and excursions of the bead were monitored for another 30 min. For comparison, the percentages of time spent by individual tethers in the looped state during the two observation periods (before and after washout of LacI) were calculated. Supplementary Figure S3 shows the lack of correlation between the looping probabilities measured on individual DNA tethers before and after, suggesting that the looping behavior of a DNA tether is dictated by variations in the activity of associated individual LacI proteins in the two observation periods. While there may be variation in the activity of individual LacI enzymes, the following experiments on supercoiled DNA molecules established conditions in which all DNA tethers exhibited a narrow range of looping probabilities within observations on the timescale of the doubling time of E. coli. Thus, activity variations do not appear to be significant.
Such extreme variation in the stability of lac-mediated loops might occur in vivo, but it is difficult to rationalize how it could benefit E. coli bacteria that must calibrate a response to lactose. Thus, there might be factors in vivo that turn looping into a deterministic process. Since protein-mediated looping is a ubiquitous regulatory mechanism across biological kingdoms, this question transcends the specific organism and is relevant for cells of all organisms. We hypothesized that genome-compacting proteins and DNA supercoiling, which are common to all species, might decrease the variation in looping probability, because they compact DNA, change DNA flexibility and reduce the distance between sites joined by the looping protein. As a model genome-compacting protein, we chose the nucleoid-associated protein HU that is abundant in bacteria, binds nonspecifically to DNA, contributes to the overall architecture of the genome, facilitates protein-mediated looping and influences DNA replication and transcription (38,50–54).
To determine whether HU can eliminate variation in looping probabilities, TPM experiments were conducted at one LacI concentration (2.5 nM), while the HU concentration was titrated from 0 to ∼1 μM. The LacI concentration was chosen such that it would be easy to measure with negligible uncertainty, and increases or decreases in the looping probability would be obvious (38). As shown previously by our lab and others, in the salt condition we use here, the magnitude of excursions of beads tethered to single DNA molecules decreases as HU concentrations increase (38,55–58); this protein-induced DNA compaction facilitates looping (38). Indeed, as shown in Figure 2A, increasing the HU concentration increases the median looping probability driving it from ∼20% to 80%. However, the looping probabilities of single DNA tethers ranged from 0% to 100% at each HU concentration as shown by the whiskers in the plot. The representative temporal traces in Figure 2B show tethers that never looped, tethers that remained looped throughout the observation and others that toggled between the looped and unlooped states. This is similar to what was observed for LacI-induced looping without additional factors (Figure 1), indicating that HU, despite its ability to compact DNA and favor looping overall, did not reduce the variation in the looping probabilities of different DNA tethers.
Figure 2.

HU did not reduce the variation of looping probabilities among different tethers. (A) The calculated looping probabilities of individual tethers, exposed to 2.5 nM and a range of HU protein concentrations, are summarized in a box–whisker plot. The whiskers span the entire range of probabilities of the ensemble of DNA tethers monitored in each condition. As the HU concentration was titrated from 0 to 1056 nM, the average looping probability progressively increased from 25 to just above 80. Note, however, that at each concentration of HU, the looping probabilities for individual DNA tethers varied from 0 to 100. The upper and lower borders of the boxes indicate the upper and lower quartiles, respectively. The midline and cross of each box indicate the median and average of the distribution of looping probabilities, respectively. (B) Representative temporal records of the TPM excursion parameter
with 2.5 nM LacI and 66 nM HU are ranked by looping probability from 0 (top) to 1 (bottom). Unlooped states have larger excursions (tall/red signal) and looped states have narrower excursions (short/blue and green signal). The actual
values are encoded using the color scale at right.
DNA supercoiling is a second factor responsible for genome compaction in live cells. It refers to the over- or underwinding of a DNA molecule, which is often quantified as the ratio of the number of turns added to a DNA molecule over the number of helical turns in the torsionally relaxed state. In live cells, DNA supercoiling is ubiquitous and dynamic (35,59,60), genomes are negatively supercoiled overall, and it has been shown that DNA unwinding under low, physiological forces compacts DNA in a way that facilitates looping by proteins (38).
MTs (61) were used to modulate supercoiling and measure its effect on LacI-induced looping, focusing on the level of heterogeneity of the looping probabilities of different tethers. In these experiments, the magnetic field generated by a pair of magnets above the microchamber attracts and orients the beads applying tension to the DNA. In addition, if the magnets are rotated, DNA will be twisted. If DNA is twisted under low tension, either winding or unwinding will induce plectonemes that decrease the extension of the DNA. LacI-mediated loops persist long enough in supercoiled DNA tethers to reduce the average tether length. These stable intervals of reduced extension mark loop formation and breakdown and endure longer as (−) supercoiling increases.
Figure 3 summarizes measurements of LacI-mediated looping probability for the 2115- and 2011-bp DNA tethers unwound to different degrees under three different tensions. Tension completely suppressed looping in torsionally relaxed DNA, σ ≈ 0%, but negative supercoiling compensated and progressively increased the looping probability at all three levels of tension. This is consistent with enhanced binding of LacI to negatively supercoiled DNA (62). As expected based on previously published data, increasing (negative) supercoiling drove the looping probability to 100% (38). However, it is remarkable that looping probabilities measured for different DNA tethers were tightly grouped around the median values. Whereas the ensemble of torsionally unconstrained DNA tethers in TPM experiments displayed the entire range of looping probabilities, negative supercoiling dramatically reduced variation and produced quite uniform, deterministic behavior at each of the three tensions. This uniformity is illustrated in Figure 3B, in which individual time traces, recorded under 0.45 pN of tension and σ ≈ −2.5%, are quite similar and exhibit frequent switching between unlooped (tall/red) and looped (short/blue-green) states. The effect of positive supercoiling was previously investigated, but (+) winding facilitated looping only at very low forces (0.25 pN). In addition, at higher forces or σ, the signal was noisy and loops were difficult to distinguish unambiguously (38). Genomic DNA has large negatively supercoiled regions as shown by psoralen staining of eukaryotic cells (60) or bacteria (35), and plasmids extracted from bacteria display supercoiling as low as −7.75% and rise to −6.5% as cultures reach saturation (41). Here, much lower levels of supercoiling shift the equilibrium completely to the looped state.
Figure 3.

Supercoiling dramatically reduces the variation of looping probabilities among DNA tethers. (A) The calculated looping probabilities of individual tethers, exposed to 1 nM LacI and negatively supercoiled to varying degrees, are summarized in a box–whisker plot. The whiskers span the entire range of probabilities of the ensemble of DNA tethers monitored in each condition. As the supercoiling was varied from 0% to almost −5% (σ), the average looping probability progressively increased from 0 to 100. Note that at each level of supercoiling, the looping probabilities for individual DNA tethers formed compact distributions. The upper and lower borders of the boxes indicate the upper and lower quartiles, respectively. The midline and cross of each box indicate the median and average of the distribution of looping probabilities, respectively. The whiskers and quartiles are only distinct for intermediate values of negative supercoiling. For low and high levels of negative supercoiling, the whiskers collapse to the median value. (B) Representative temporal records of the instantaneous lengths of DNA tethers exposed to 1 nM LacI while stretched by 0.45 pN of tension and supercoiled to σ = −2.5% are shown. Unlooped states have larger excursions (tall/red signal) and looped states have narrower excursions (short/blue and green signal). The actual tether length values are encoded using the color scale at right.
Since single supercoiled molecules observed over a period of 20 min behaved ergodically, while single, torsionally relaxed molecules, observed for 30 min, did not, we conducted several much longer, up to 5-h, recordings of LacI-mediated looping in torsionally relaxed DNA using TPM (Supplementary Figure S4). We then measured the looping probabilities over temporal windows of different lengths, ranging from 10 min to the entire 5-h-long recording. Figure 4A is an overlay of the cumulative probability distributions for looping percentages calculated for entire 5-h records (black) or divided into shorter segments of 10 min (blue), 30 min (green), 40 min (red), 60 min (cyan), 80 min (magenta) and 100 min (yellow). At least 60 min of observation is required to accurately sample the dynamics of LacI-mediated looping in a DNA construct containing the O1 and O2 operators separated by 400 bp; i.e. ergodicity is attained with recordings of no less than 60 min. The looping probability in records for unwound DNA was analyzed in a similar manner and showed that a cumulative distribution of looping probabilities equivalent to that attained in 20-min-long measurements is achieved in just 12 min (Figure 4B and Supplementary Figure S5).
Figure 4.

Minimum observation times for ergodicity. Cumulative distributions of the looping probability for (A) different periods of TPM observations (10, 30, 40, 60, 80 and 100 min) and (B) different periods of MT observations (2, 5, 10, 12, 15 and 18 min) are plotted along with the cumulative distribution for the entire set of observations (black curves). All records used in this analysis were for 0.25 pN tension and 1.5% supercoiling. Only when observations last at least 60 min (A) or 12 min (B) do the cumulative distributions of the looping probabilities for individual molecules resemble the distributions for the maximum length observations. With shorter observation periods, the looping probabilities measured for individual molecules vary widely. For example, in the TPM data in panel (A), looping probabilities measured for molecules observed for 10-min intervals (blue) displayed a significant fraction of high probabilities that did not appear for the molecules observed for 60 min or more, up to 5 h (black). In panel (B), looping probabilities spanning the entire range result for 2- or 5-min period of observation but narrow to the 40–80% range when observation times are 12 min or longer.
DISCUSSION
Supercoiling makes protein-mediated looping deterministic
In the absence of supercoiling, the probabilities of LacI-mediated DNA looping for individual DNA tethers with, as well as without, HU range from 0% to 100%. In these conditions, in order for the protein to connect them, the LacI binding sites must juxtapose by 3D diffusion opposed by a high-energy barrier. HU protein helps to overcome this barrier and enhance looping by compacting the DNA to reduce the separation between the operators to be bridged. In contrast, supercoiling induces plectonemes that allow slithering of DNA segments past one another (63,64). Thus, the operators may juxtapose through 1D diffusion, across a much lower energy barrier. By reducing the dimensionality of the path to juxtaposition, supercoiling produced homogeneous looping probabilities for different DNA tethers that could not be achieved by adding HU to facilitate juxtaposition in three dimensions.
Since HU binding is known to supercoil DNA (65), it might similarly alter looping in a torsionally constrained DNA tether. This was not possible in a TPM experiment (Figure 2) in which single-bond attachments of the DNA to the surfaces would swivel to release any torsion. However, previously published data (38) showed that 1056 nM HU, which produces a median value of 85% average looping probability in DNA tethers under no tension (Figure 2), produced just 30% or 5% in DNA tethers under 0.25 or 0.45 pN of tension, respectively. If HU were actually supercoiling the DNA, then it should have sustained the looping probability under tension. The fact that it did not suggests that HU binding only compacts but does not significantly supercoil DNA in the conditions used here. To verify this, extension versus twist curves were measured for DNA in the presence of HU. In this assay, any unwinding associated with protein or small molecule binding to the DNA will alter the intrinsic twist of the molecule and shift the maximum extension of the molecule with respect to that of bare DNA (66–68). As can be seen in Supplementary Figure S6, increasing the concentration of HU up to 1000 nM steadily contracted a DNA tether stretched by 0.45 pN in 200 mM KCl but negatively supercoiled the molecule by only −1.35 turns. This is equivalent to −0.4% supercoiling, which is insufficient to produce writhe (69). Furthermore, while HU could be washed out with 300 mM KCl, it remained bound to DNA tethers twisted to high levels of positive or negative supercoiling (Supplementary Figure S7). Thus, HU enhances looping by contracting DNA tethers but does not change the dimensionality of the looping mechanism to promote uniform looping dynamics.
Supplementary Figure S8 is an illustration of hypothetical energy landscapes for looping, which involves bending and possibly twisting the DNA molecule, as shown in the superimposed molecular cartoons. Energy is color-encoded according to the scale at right. The end-to-end distance of the loop segment is represented along the vertical axis. Near-zero end-to-end distance corresponds to the looped state, while the unlooped states are more extended, up to 400 bp. The horizontal axis indicates the supercoiling in the DNA and its handedness. Panel (A) describes the experimental conditions in a TPM measurement; with no applied tension or torsion, the DNA may coil, bend and juxtapose the two operators via 3D diffusion, as shown in the superimposed cartoon. Different pathways may be followed through the broad and shallow saddle point separating the looped and unlooped states. In panel (B), sub-pN tension gently extends DNA in the absence of imposed supercoiling, and the work associated with drawing the two operator sites together increases the energy barrier, effectively attenuating loop formation. These conditions correspond to an MT measurement in which the magnets exert tension but are not rotated to twist the DNA as shown in the superimposed cartoon. However, in plectonemic DNA as shown in the cartoon superimposed on panel (C), operator sites can juxtapose as DNA segments slither past each other in the plectoneme. This 1D search for juxtaposition between looped and unlooped states changes the dynamics of looping with respect to the 3D searches required in torsionally unrestrained DNA tethers.
Supercoiling induces ergodicity within a biologically relevant timescale
The TPM records in this work were between 20 and 30 min long, slightly below or equal to the doubling time of E. coli, which is ∼30 min in the laboratory (23). The heterogeneity of looping probabilities observed in these records without supercoiling was extreme and seemingly at odds with a molecular system designed to respond to the presence of lactose. Such a system was expected to be ergodic, such that sufficiently long observations of single members of the ensemble would have exhibited the statistical behavior of the whole ensemble. When several much longer, 5-h, recordings of LacI-mediated looping in torsionally relaxed DNA were acquired using TPM and the looping probabilities were measured over temporal windows of different lengths, it was clear that observations for periods <60 min exhibit a tail of high looping probabilities that is not present in distributions from longer observations. Only recordings ≥60 min produce distributions like the 5-h distribution. In other words, observations >1 h are required to accurately sample the dynamics of LacI-mediated looping in a DNA construct containing the O1 and O2 operators separated by 400 bp; i.e. ergodicity behavior is not displayed in recordings of <60 min. This is due to the inherent stochastic nature of protein-mediated looping. If, however, DNA molecules are supercoiled, the reduced dimensionality modulating juxtaposition of the protein binding sites accelerates dynamics such that all DNA tethers exhibit similar looping probability, and the statistical behavior of the ensemble can be revealed in much shorter observations of a single molecule. Indeed, analysis of looping probability in records for unwound DNA shows that a cumulative distribution of looping probabilities equivalent to that attained in 20-min-long measurements is achieved in just 12 min (Figure 4B and Supplementary Figure S5B). Thus, looping dynamics in supercoiled DNA are deterministic within the timescale of the doubling time of the bacteria, effectively the cell cycle.
CONCLUSION
Recently, LacI was observed to hop along the double helix (70). This feature together with negative supercoiling is probably key for the protein to efficiently locate a binding site, contact a secondary binding site and maintain a constant ratio of looped versus unlooped states in the various states of tension and torsion that likely develop during the cell cycle. This ratio gives a definitive regulatory outcome to looping based on inherently stochastic molecular activity. Additional parameters may contribute to achieving a specific outcome, but for simple protein-mediated looping, DNA supercoiling appears to be key.
DATA AVAILABILITY
Data for the figures presented in this article are deposited in Emory Dataverse (https://doi.org/10.15139/S3/YTKRI8).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We are grateful to Todd Lillian at the University of Southern Alabama for critical discussions. Kathleen Matthews at Rice University generously provided the LacI protein. Plasmid pRLM118 was a gift from Roger McMacken (Johns Hopkins University).
Author contributions: Conceptualization, D.D., L.F., Y.Y., S.K.; methodology, S.K., Y.Y., W.X., D.D., F.L.; software, S.K., Y.Y., W.X.; formal analysis, Y.Y., W.X., S.K., A.Z.; investigation, S.K., Y.Y., A.Z., W.X.; writing—original draft, L.F., Y.Y., W.X., A.Z.; writing, reviewing and editing, L.F., D.D.; funding acquisition, L.F., F.L.; resources, F.L.
Notes
Present address: Yan Yan, Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Present address: Sandip Kumar, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Contributor Information
Yan Yan, Physics Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Wenxuan Xu, Physics Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Sandip Kumar, Physics Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Alexander Zhang, Physics Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Fenfei Leng, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA.
David Dunlap, Physics Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Laura Finzi, Physics Department, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Supplementary Data are available at NAR Online.
FUNDING
National Institutes of Health [R01 GM084070 to L.F., 1R21AI125973-01A1 to F.L.]. Funding for open access charge: National Institutes of Health [R01 GM084070].
Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1. Brennan L.D., Forties R.A., Patel S.S., Wang M.D.. DNA looping mediates nucleosome transfer. Nature Commun. 2016; 7:13337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Duderstadt K.E., Geertsema H.J., Stratmann S.A., Punter C.M., Kulczyk A.W., Richardson C.C., van Oijen A.M.. Simultaneous real-time imaging of leading and lagging strand synthesis reveals the coordination dynamics of single replisomes. Mol. Cell. 2016; 64:1035–1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hnisz D., Day D.S., Young R.A.. Insulated neighborhoods: structural and functional units of mammalian gene control. Cell. 2016; 167:1188–1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Priest D.G., Cui L., Kumar S., Dunlap D.D., Dodd I.B., Shearwin K.E.. Quantitation of the DNA tethering effect in long-range DNA looping in vivo and in vitro using the Lac and λ repressors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014; 111:349–354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Qian Z., Trostel A., Lewis D.E.A., Lee S.J., He X.M., Stringer A.M., Wade J.T., Schneiders T.D., Durfee T., Adhya S.. Genome-wide transcriptional regulation and chromosome structural arrangement by GalR in E. coli. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2016; 3:74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Dekel E., Alon U.. Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein. Nature. 2005; 436:588–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Jacob F., Monod J.. Genetic regulatory mechanisms in synthesis of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1961; 3:318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Nelson P.C. Biological Physics: Energy, Information, Life. 2003; NY: W.H. Freeman. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Phillips R., Kondev Y., Theriot J., Garcia H.. Physical Biology of the Cell. 2013; Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bido A.T., Nordberg B.G., Engevik M.A., Lindquist N.C., Brolo A.G.. High-speed fluctuations in surface-enhanced Raman scattering intensities from various nanostructures. Appl. Spectrosc. 2020; 74:1398–1406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kundu P., Saha S., Gangopadhyay G.. Stochastic kinetic approach to the escape of DNA hairpins from an alpha-hemolysin channel. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2020; 124:6575–6584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Milenkovic S., Bodrenko I.V., Lagostena L., Gradogna A., Serra G., Bosin A., Carpaneto A., Ceccarelli M.. The mechanism and energetics of a ligand-controlled hydrophobic gate in a mammalian two pore channel. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020; 22:15664–15674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Datta S., Seed B.. Influence of multiplicative stochastic variation on translational elongation rates. PLoS One. 2018; 13:e0191152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Graham J.E., Marians K.J., Kowalczykowski S.C.. Independent and stochastic action of DNA polymerases in the replisome. Cell. 2017; 169:1201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kumar A., Chatterjee S., Nandi M., Dua A.. Emergence of dynamic cooperativity in the stochastic kinetics of fluctuating enzymes. J. Chem. Phys. 2016; 145:085103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Miyashita S., Ishibashi K., Kishino H., Ishikawa M.. Viruses roll the dice: the stochastic behavior of viral genome molecules accelerates viral adaptation at the cell and tissue levels. PLoS Biol. 2015; 13:e1002094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Neuman K.C., Abbondanzieri E.A., Landick R., Gelles J., Block S.M.. Ubiquitous transcriptional pausing is independent of RNA polymerase backtracking. Cell. 2003; 115:437–447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wang M.D., Schnitzer M.J., Yin H., Landick R., Gelles J., Block S.M.. Force and velocity measured for single molecules of RNA polymerase. Science. 1998; 282:902–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Finzi L., Gelles J.. Measurement of lactose repressor-mediated loop formation and breakdown in single DNA molecules. Science. 1995; 267:378–380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Manzo C., Zurla C., Dunlap D., Finzi L.. Lambda genetic switch sensitivity depends on complex looping kinetics driven by nonspecific binding. Eur. Biophys. J. Biophys. Lett. 2011; 40:98–98. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Manzo C., Zurla C., Dunlap D.D., Finzi L.. The effect of nonspecific binding of lambda repressor on DNA looping dynamics. Biophys. J. 2012; 103:1753–1761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zurla C., Manzo C., Dunlap D., Lewis D.E.A., Adhya S., Finzi L.. Direct demonstration and quantification of long-range DNA looping by the λ bacteriophage repressor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37:2789–2795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gibson B., Wilson D.J., Feil E., Eyre-Walker A.. The distribution of bacterial doubling times in the wild. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2018; 285:20180789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Moore C.C. Ergodic theorem, ergodic theory, and statistical mechanics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2015; 112:1907–1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Palmer R.G. Broken ergodicity. Adv. Phys. 1982; 31:669–735. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Benkovic S.J., Hammes-Schiffer S.. A perspective on enzyme catalysis. Science. 2003; 301:1196–1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Record M.T. Jr, Courtenay E.S., Cayley S., Guttman H.J.. Biophysical compensation mechanisms buffering E. coli protein–nucleic acid interactions against changing environments. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1998; 23:190–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Meroz Y., Sokolov I.M., Klafter J.. Subdiffusion of mixed origins: when ergodicity and nonergodicity coexist. Phys. Rev. E. 2010; 81:010101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Magdziarz M., Weron A., Burnecki K., Klafter J.. Fractional Brownian motion versus the continuous-time random walk: a simple test for subdiffusive dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009; 103:180602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Szymanski J., Weiss M.. Elucidating the origin of anomalous diffusion in crowded fluids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009; 103:038102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Lubelski A., Sokolov I.M., Klafter J.. Nonergodicity mimics inhomogeneity in single particle tracking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008; 100:250602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Cayley S., Lewis B.A., Guttman H.J., Record M.T.. Characterization of the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli K-12 as a function of external osmolarity: implications for protein–DNA interactions in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 1991; 222:281–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Golding I. Infection by bacteriophage lambda: an evolving paradigm for cellular individuality. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2018; 43:9–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Macvanin M., Adhya S.. Architectural organization in E. coli nucleoid. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2012; 1819:830–835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lal A., Dhar A., Trostel A., Kouzine F., Seshasayee A.S., Adhya S.. Genome scale patterns of supercoiling in a bacterial chromosome. Nat. Commun. 2016; 7:11055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Koli P., Sudan S., Fitzgerald D., Adhya S., Kar S.. Conversion of commensal Escherichia coli K-12 to an invasive form via expression of a mutant histone-like protein. mBio. 2011; 2:e00182-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Hammel M., Amlanjyoti D., Reyes F.E., Chen J.-H., Parpana R., Tang H.Y.H., Larabell C.A., Tainer J.A., Adhya S.. HU multimerization shift controls nucleoid compaction. Sci. Adv. 2016; 2:e1600650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Yan Y., Leng F., Finzi L., Dunlap D.. Protein-mediated looping of DNA under tension requires supercoiling. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46:2370–2379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Whitson P.A., Hsieh W.T., Wells R.D., Matthews K.S.. Influence of supercoiling and sequence context on operator DNA binding with lac repressor. J. Biol. Chem. 1987; 262:14592–14599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Adhya S. Multipartite genetic-control elements: communication by DNA loop. Annu. Rev. Genet. 1989; 23:227–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Fulcrand G., Dages S., Zhi X., Chapagain P., Gerstman B.S., Dunlap D., Leng F.. DNA supercoiling, a critical signal regulating the basal expression of the lac operon in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 2016; 6:19243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Vörös Z., Yan Y., Kovari D.T., Finzi L., Dunlap D. Proteins mediating DNA loops effectively block transcription. Protein Sci. 2017; 26:1427–1438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Han L., Lui B.H., Blumberg S., Beausang J.F., Nelson P.C., Phillips R.. Benham C.J., Harvey S., Olson W.K., Sumners D.W.L., Swigon D.. Calibration of tethered particle motion experiments. Mathematics of DNA Structure, Function and Interactions. 2009; 150:NY: Springer; 123–138. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kumar S., Manzo C., Zurla C., Ucuncuoglu S., Finzi L., Dunlap D.. Enhanced tethered-particle motion analysis reveals viscous effects. Biophys. J. 2014; 106:399–409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kovari D.T., Yan Y., Finzi L., Dunlap D.. Peterman E.J.G. Tethered particle motion: an easy technique for probing DNA topology and interactions with transcription factors. Single Molecule Analysis: Methods and Protocols. 2018; 1665:2nd ednNY: Springer; 317–340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Priest D.G., Kumar S., Yan Y., Dunlap D.D., Dodd I.B., Shearwin K.E.. Quantitation of interactions between two DNA loops demonstrates loop domain insulation in E. coli cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2014; 111:E4449–E4457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Ucuncuoglu S., Schneider D.A., Weeks E.R., Dunlap D., Finzi L.. Spies M., Chemla Y.R.. Multiplexed, tethered particle microscopy for studies of DNA–enzyme dynamics. Methods in Enzymology. 2017; 582:NY: Academic Press; 415–435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Little M.A., Jones N.S.. Sparse Bayesian step-filtering for high-throughput analysis of molecular machine dynamics. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. 2010; Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; 4162–4165. [Google Scholar]
- 49. Han L., Garcia H.G., Blumberg S., Towles K.B., Beausang J.F., Nelson P.C., Phillips R.. Concentration and length dependence of DNA looping in transcriptional regulation. PLoS One. 2009; 4:e5621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Rouvière-Yaniv J., Yaniv M., Germond J.-E.. E. coli DNA binding protein HU forms nucleosome-like structure with circular double-stranded DNA. Cell. 1979; 17:265–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Berger M., Gerganova V., Berger P., Rapiteanu R., Lisicovas V., Dobrindt U.. Genes on a wire: the nucleoid-associated protein HU insulates transcription units in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 2016; 6:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Morales P., Rouviere-Yaniv J., Dreyfus M.. The histone-like protein HU does not obstruct movement of T7 RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli cells but stimulates its activity. J. Bacteriol. 2002; 184:1565–1570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Bahloul A., Boubrik F., Rouviere-Yaniv J.. Roles of Escherichia coli histone-like protein HU in DNA replication: HU-beta suppresses the thermosensitivity of dnaA46ts. Biochimie. 2001; 83:219–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Yan Y., Ding Y., Leng F.F., Dunlap D., Finzi L.. Protein-mediated loops in supercoiled DNA create large topological domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 46:4417–4424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Xiao B., Johnson R.C., Marko J.F.. Modulation of HU–DNA interactions by salt concentration and applied force. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38:6176–6185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Nir G., Lindner M., Dietrich H.R.C., Girshevitz O., Vorgias C.E., Garini Y.. HU protein induces incoherent DNA persistence length. Biophys. J. 2011; 100:784–790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Sagi D., Friedman N., Vorgias C., Oppenheim A.B., Stavans J.. Modulation of DNA conformations through the formation of alternative high-order HU–DNA complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 2004; 341:419–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. van Noort J., Verbrugge S., Goosen N., Dekker C., Dame R.T.. Dual architectural roles of HU: formation of flexible hinges and rigid filaments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004; 101:6969–6974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Kouzine F., Gupta A., Baranello L., Wojtowicz D., Ben-Aissa K., Liu J.H., Przytycka T.M., Levens D. Transcription-dependent dynamic supercoiling is a short-range genomic force. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013; 20:396–403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Naughton C., Avlonitis N., Corless S., Prendergast J.G., Mati I.K., Eijk P.P., Cockroft S.L., Bradley M., Ylstra B., Gilbert N.. Transcription forms and remodels supercoiling domains unfolding large-scale chromatin structures. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013; 20:387–395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Finzi L., Dunlap D.D.. Single-molecule approaches to probe the structure, kinetics, and thermodynamics of nucleoprotein complexes that regulate transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2010; 285:18973–18978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Whitson P.A., Hsieh W.T., Wells R.D., Matthews K.S.. Supercoiling facilitates lac operator–repressor–pseudooperator interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 1987; 262:4943–4946. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Kim S.H., Ganji M., Kim E., van der Torre J., Abbondanzieri E., Dekker C.. DNA sequence encodes the position of DNA supercoils. eLife. 2018; 7:e36557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. van Loenhout M.T.J., de Grunt M.V., Dekker C.. Dynamics of DNA supercoils. Science. 2012; 338:94–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Guo F., Adhya S.. Spiral structure of Escherichia coli HUαβ provides foundation for DNA supercoiling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007; 104:4309–4314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Lipfert J., Klijnhout S., Dekker N.H.. Torsional sensing of small-molecule binding using magnetic tweezers. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38:7122–7132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Salerno D., Brogioli D., Cassina V., Turchi D., Beretta G.L., Seruggia D., Ziano R., Zunino F., Mantegazza F.. Magnetic tweezers measurements of the nanomechanical properties of DNA in the presence of drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010; 38:7089–7099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Vlijm R., Kim S.H., De Zwart P.L., Dalal Y., Dekker C.. The supercoiling state of DNA determines the handedness of both H3 and CENP-A nucleosomes. Nanoscale. 2017; 9:1862–1870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Brutzer H., Luzzietti N., Klaue D., Seidel R.. Energetics at the DNA supercoiling transition. Biophys. J. 2010; 98:1267–1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Marklund E., van Oosten B., Mao G., Amselem E., Kipper K., Sabantsev A., Emmerich A., Globisch D., Zheng X., Lehmann L.C.et al.. DNA surface exploration and operator bypassing during target search. Nature. 2020; 583:858–861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data for the figures presented in this article are deposited in Emory Dataverse (https://doi.org/10.15139/S3/YTKRI8).
