Skip to main content
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) logoLink to Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
. 2021 Sep 3;36(12):3122–3130. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab201

Preconception leukocyte telomere length and pregnancy outcomes among women with demonstrated fecundity

Alexandra C Purdue-Smithe 1, Keewan Kim 1, Victoria C Andriessen 1, Anna Z Pollack 2, Lindsey A Sjaarda 1, Robert M Silver 3, Enrique F Schisterman 4, Sunni L Mumford 1,
PMCID: PMC8600655  PMID: 34477845

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

Is preconception leukocyte telomere length associated with fecundability, pregnancy loss and live birth among women attempting natural conception with a history of 1–2 prior pregnancy losses?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Preconception leukocyte telomere length is not associated with fecundability, pregnancy loss or live birth.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

As women increasingly delay childbearing, accessible preconception biomarkers to predict pregnancy outcomes among women seeking natural conception could improve preconception counseling. Findings of small case–control or cross-sectional studies suggest that telomere attrition is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes among women undergoing fertility treatment, but prospective studies in non-clinical populations are lacking.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Participants included 1228 women aged 18–40 years with a history of 1–2 prior pregnancy losses who were recruited at four university medical centers (2006–2012).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Preconception leukocyte telomere length was measured at baseline using PCR and reported as a ratio (T/S) in relation to population-specific standard reference DNA. Women were followed for up to six cycles while attempting to conceive. Associations of telomere length with fecundability, live birth and pregnancy loss were estimated using discrete Cox proportional hazards models and log-binomial models.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

After adjustment for age, BMI, smoking and other factors, preconception telomere length was not associated with fecundability (Q4 vs Q1 FOR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.79, 1.27), live birth (Q4 vs Q1 RR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.85, 1.19), or pregnancy loss (Q4 vs Q1 RR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.78, 1.62).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Telomere length was measured in leukocytes, which is an accessible tissue in women attempting natural conception but may not reflect telomere length in oocytes. Most women were younger than 35 years, limiting our ability to evaluate associations among older women. Participants had a history of 1–2 prior pregnancy losses; therefore, our findings may not be widely generalizable.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Despite prior research suggesting that telomere length may be associated with pregnancy outcomes among women seeking fertility treatment, our findings suggest that leukocyte telomere length is not a suitable biomarker of pregnancy establishment or maintenance among women attempting natural conception.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; contract numbers HHSN267200603423, HHSN267200603424 and HHSN267200603426). The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00467363.

Keywords: telomere / fertility / reproductive aging / biologic aging / pregnancy loss / fecundity

Introduction

Female reproductive aging is characterized by the gradual decline of the quantity and quality of oocytes in the ovarian cortex, beginning in utero and ending at menopause (Broekmans et al., 2007). The decline of the ovarian follicle pool confers greater risk of meiotic non-disjunction and embryonic aneuploidy, which in turn contributes to a lower likelihood of pregnancy and live birth, and higher risk of pregnancy loss (Te Velde and Pearson, 2002). The inability to conceive as desired can have psychological and financial consequences (Broekmans et al., 2007) as infertility treatment is frequently costly, invasive and not always effective, particularly in the context of advanced maternal age (Smith et al., 2015). Chronologic age is the only established biomarker of subfertility and infertility among women attempting natural conception (DeCherney and Berkowitz, 1982; Dunson et al., 2004), but considerable interindividual variation in reproductive longevity exists, presumably related to genetic traits and lifestyle, environmental and social factors that slow or accelerate the reproductive and biologic aging process (Te Velde and Pearson, 2002; Gold, 2011). Biomarkers of ovarian reserve, such as anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), reliably predict oocyte yield among women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF (Wu et al., 2009), but have little utility in predicting pregnancy outcomes among women attempting natural conception (Zarek et al., 2015, 2016; Steiner et al., 2017). As women increasingly delay childbearing into the later reproductive years (Te Velde and Pearson, 2002), identifying accessible preconception biomarkers that improve prediction of pregnancy outcomes beyond chronologic age in non-clinical populations could enhance preconception counseling by providing women with a more individualized estimate of their likelihood pregnancy and live birth.

Telomeres, non-coding DNA regions that preserve genomic stability and ensure proper chromosome segregation, are hypothesized to play a role in the poor pregnancy outcomes associated with reproductive aging, and may offer promise as a potential preconception biomarker (Keefe et al., 2006). The telomeres of oocytes remaining in the ovarian cortex during the later reproductive years are shorter owing to the accumulation of DNA damage from reactive oxygen species throughout the lifetime, which may contribute to the genetic abnormalities associated with subfertility and pregnancy loss (Keefe et al., 2007; Shammas, 2011). Most, but not all (Keefe et al., 2005; Hanna et al., 2009; Cheng et al., 2013; Czamanski-Cohen et al., 2015; Morin et al., 2018; Hanson et al., 2021) epidemiologic data suggest that shorter telomere length is associated with infertility and poorer IVF treatment outcomes; however, studies among women attempting natural conception are lacking. Additional studies have reported shorter telomere length among women with recurrent pregnancy loss (Hanna et al., 2009; Thilagavathi et al., 2013) as well as higher parity (Gray et al., 2014; Pollack et al., 2018), suggesting that having more children may accelerate telomere attrition. However, inference from these studies is limited by cross-sectional design or modest sample sizes.

Considering the need for noninvasive preconception biomarkers and the lack of prospective data on preconception telomere length and pregnancy outcomes among women attempting natural conception, the objective of our study was to evaluate associations of preconception leukocyte telomere length, a biomarker that can be measured by standard blood collection, with fecundability, pregnancy loss and live birth among 1228 healthy reproductive-age women attempting pregnancy who had a history of 1–2 pregnancy losses.

Materials and methods

Study population

This was a secondary analysis of the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction (EAGeR) trial, a multi-center, block-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial designed to determine the effect of preconception-initiated daily low-dose aspirin on reproductive outcomes in women with history of pregnancy loss (Schisterman et al., 2013, 2014). The trial design and overall results have been described previously (Schisterman et al., 2013).

Study participants were 1228 women attempting pregnancy, aged 18–40 years, with 1–2 prior pregnancy losses. Women with a known history of infertility treatment, pelvic inflammatory disease, tubal occlusion, endometriosis, anovulation and polycystic ovary syndrome, or uterine abnormality were excluded from participation. Participants were recruited at four clinical sites in the USA from 2007 to 2011 and followed for up to six menstrual cycles while attempting pregnancy and then throughout pregnancy for women who conceived. Baseline demographic characteristics and reproductive history information was obtained via questionnaire. Follow-up was completed by 1088 participants (89%).

Ethical approval

The institutional review board at each US study site (Salt Lake City, UT, USA; Denver, CO, USA; Buffalo, NY, USA; Scranton, PA, USA) and data coordinating center approved the trial protocol and all participants provided written informed consent prior to enrolling. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00467363.

Biomarker assessment

After enrollment in the EAGeR trial and prior to randomization, women provided blood samples in EDTA lavender-top tubes at the clinic, which were frozen and stored at −80°C until analysis (Tsai Lab, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Leukocyte DNA was extracted from buffy coat samples using the PureGene DNA Isolation reagents from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany). The concentration of DNA was determined using a NanoDrop Spectrophotometer and PicoGreen quantification assay provided by Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR, USA). The telomere repeat copy number to single gene copy number (T/S) ratio was determined using a previously described method (McGrath et al., 2007), except in a 384-well format using a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Leukocyte telomere length was measured in relation to a standard DNA reference as a T/S ratio in duplicate 1–2 times. Leukocyte telomere length was equal to the mean of the 2–4 T/S ratio measurements for each individual. The corresponding number of base pairs was calculated using the following formula: 3274 + 2413 × (T/S ratio). In total, 1171 women in the study population had available leukocyte telomere length measurements.

Preconception AMH concentrations were measured in serum samples collected on Days 2–4 of the menstrual cycle using the GEN II ELISA™ assay (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). All machine observed concentrations were used without substitution of concentration below the limits of detection (0.006 ng/ml) (Craciunas et al., 2015). The inter-assay laboratory coefficients of variation were 6.2% and 6.6% at mean concentrations of 8.9 and 3.1 ng/ml, respectively, for lyophilized manufacturer’s controls and 6.3% for an in-house pooled serum control.

Pregnancy outcomes

Outcomes examined included time to hCG-detected pregnancy (in menstrual cycles), pregnancy loss and live birth. Urine hCG tests were conducted at home, on the expected day of menses, or in the clinic if the participant reported a missed menses. Tests were sensitive to 25 mIU/ml (Quidel Quickvue, Quidel Corp, San Diego, CA, USA). β-hCG was also measured from first-morning daily urine samples provided by participants on the last 10 days of their menstrual cycle during Cycles 1 and 2, and from spot urine samples collected at all end of cycle visits. Two assays (initial test: catalogue no. RIS0011R, BioVendor, Asheville, NC, USA; confirmatory test: catalogue no. 4221-16, Diagnostic Automation Inc., Calabasas, CA, USA), performed sequentially, detected very early pregnancies with higher sensitivity. Clinically confirmed intrauterine pregnancies were confirmed by ultrasound visualization at clinic visits during gestational weeks 6 and 7.

Pregnancy loss was defined as a positive pregnancy test at home or at the clinic site followed by the absence of a clinically confirmed pregnancy; or positive hCG from batched augmented urine samples followed by the absence of a positive at home or clinic pregnancy test; or a loss occurring after clinical ultrasound confirmation but prior to 20 weeks after the last menstrual period. Live birth was defined as a live-born infant after 23 weeks’ gestation.

Statistical analysis

We first plotted the distribution of telomere length to assess normality. Using generalized linear models, we compared the distribution of sociodemographic characteristics, reproductive history and anthropometric measurements according to quartiles of telomere length. We addressed missing data on leukocyte telomere length and covariate data using multiple imputation with fully conditional specification and 10 replications. The telomere length was missing for 57 women (5%) and less than 8% of women had missing covariate data.

For all analyses, we modeled leukocyte telomere length in both its continuous form and in quartiles because established cut-points for telomere length are not available. We used discrete-time Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate fecundability odds ratios (FOR) and 95% CI per 1000 base-pairs or compared to the lowest quartile of leukocyte telomere length. Models accounted for left truncation (i.e. cycles attempting pregnancy before enrollment) and right-censoring. An FOR describes the probability of becoming pregnant in a given cycle, conditional on not being pregnant in the previous cycle. An FOR >1 indicates improved fecundability or shorter time to pregnancy, whereas an FOR <1 indicates reduced fecundability or longer time to pregnancy.

We utilized log-binomial models to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% CI for pregnancy loss and live birth according to leukocyte telomere length. Models evaluating live birth included all women in the EAGeR population (n = 1228) and answer the question, ‘Based on preconception telomere length, what is the likelihood of having a live-born baby?’, which is presumably the question of greatest interest to a woman or clinician in the preconception period. Models evaluating pregnancy loss were limited to women who became pregnant, which could introduce selection bias if factors that affect selection into the pregnant group also affect pregnancy loss (Flannagan and Mumford, 2020). To address this potential bias, we employed inverse-probability weights to account for the selection bias imposed by conditioning on pregnancy (Cole and Hernan, 2008). The logistic regression models used to generate the inverse-probability weights included factors associated with pregnancy in this cohort, including age, BMI, number of previous losses, number of previous live births, smoking status, alcohol use, race, multivitamin use and income. In this context, the RRs for pregnancy loss estimated from inverse-probability weighted models can be interpreted as the association of preconception leukocyte telomere length and pregnancy loss that would be observed if, possibly counter to fact, all women in the EAGeR population had become pregnant. Estimates from these models answer the question, ‘Based on preconception telomere length, what is the likelihood of a pregnancy loss, conditional on an hCG-detected pregnancy?’ This would be a relevant question for a woman at a preconception visit, who may want to know her likelihood of pregnancy loss if she goes on to conceive.

We identified potential confounders using directed acyclic graphs (Shrier and Platt, 2008). In analyses, we specified three sets of models: unadjusted (Model 1); adjusted for BMI (continuous), number of previous losses (1 or 2), number of previous live births (0, 1, or 2), smoking status (smoker or non-smoker), alcohol use (drinker or non-drinker), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white or other), multivitamin use (yes or no) and income (≥$40 000 or <$40 000) (Model 2); and adjusted for factors included in model 2 + age (continuous) (Model 3). We included models not adjusted for age (Model 2) to estimate the overall association of telomere length, as a marker of biological aging on pregnancy outcomes. In Model 3, which was adjusted for age, we estimated the associations of telomere length with pregnancy outcomes, independent of chronologic age (as a marker of the passage of time).

To determine whether associations may be limited to women at the older end of the age range in our population, we also stratified each of our analyses by age (<30 vs ≥30 years). Because race itself is not a cause, but rather a poor proxy for social determinants of health or genetic factors, we conducted sensitivity analyses in which we omitted race from multivariable models. To assess whether our use of multiple imputation to impute exposure data may have impacted our results, we also conducted sensitivity analyses limited to women with complete data on telomere length (n = 1171). In models examining pregnancy loss as an outcome, we additionally conducted sensitivity analyses that did not include an inverse-probability weight in the model. To facilitate comparison of the EAGeR population with previous cross-sectional data, which suggests that higher parity is associated with shorter telomeres (Pollack et al., 2018), we further explored the cross-sectional association of baseline parity and leukocyte telomere length in our study population using generalized linear models adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, race/ethnicity, income, education and age at menarche. All analyses were run using SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Among 1228 women in the EAGeR trial, average age at baseline was 28.7 years (SD = 4.8). Preconception leukocyte telomere length was normally distributed in the population with a mean T/S ratio of 0.94 (SD = 0.17; range = 0.43–1.51). At baseline, younger women and women who self-identified as non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity and reported lower alcohol consumption, lower income and fewer live births had longer telomere length, on average. Women with higher AMH also had slightly longer telomere length (Table I).

Table I.

Baseline characteristics by mean preconception leukocyte telomere length among 1171 women in the EAGeR trial.

Leukocyte telomere lengtha,b
Q1 (median = 0.75) Q2 (median = 0.89) Q3 (median = 0.99) Q4 (median = 1.14)
N 279 304 290 298
Age, years 29.4 (5.0) 29.4 (4.7) 28.7 (4.7) 27.6 (4.6)
 <30 157 (56) 175 (58) 180 (62) 217 (73)
 30–34 80 (27) 91 (30) 76 (26) 58 (20)
 35–37 14 (5) 17 (6) 17 (6) 12 (4)
 38–40 24 (9) 16 (5) 15 (4) 9 (3)
BMI, kg/m2 26.3 (6.3) 26.2 (6.5) 26.2 (6.4) 26.5 (6.6)
 <18.5 14 (5) 5 (2) 8 (3) 10 (3)
 18.5–24.9 129 (46) 160 (53) 140 (48) 138 (46)
 25.0–29.9 66 (24) 66 (22) 72 (25) 73 (25)
 >30.0 67 (24) 70 (23) 66 (23) 72 (24)
Race/ethnicity
 White 270 (97) 286 (94) 274 (94) 278 (93)
 Non-white 9 (3) 18 (6) 16 (6) 20 (7)
Smoking status
 Never 240 (86) 263 (87) 255 (88) 258 (87)
 Past 27 (10) 16 (5) 19 (7) 22 (7)
 Current 10 (4) 21 (7) 15 (5) 16 (5)
Multivitamin use
 Yes 257 (92) 279 (92) 261 (90) 274 (92)
 No 18 (7) 23 (8) 23 (8) 22 (7)
Alcohol use
 Never 181 (65) 200 (66) 195 (67) 196 (66)
 Sometimes 84 (30) 92 (30) 88 (30) 96 (32)
 Frequently 9 (3) 8 (3) 4 (1) 5 (2)
Exercise
 Low 72 (26) 69 (23) 82 (28) 81 (27)
 Moderate 112 (40) 132 (43) 124 (43) 110 (37)
 High 95 (34) 103 (34) 84 (29) 107 (36)
Income
 <$19 999 16 (6) 29 (10) 16 (6) 30 (10)
 $20 000–$39 999 63 (23) 62 (20) 75 (26) 100 (34)
 $40 000–$74 999 42 (15) 50 (17) 39 (14) 43 (14)
 $75 000–$99 999 38 (14) 37 (12) 40 (14) 29 (10)
 >$100 000 120 (43) 126 (42) 119 (41) 96 (32)
Number of previous live births
 0 128 (46) 137 (45) 119 (41) 159 (53)
 1 97 (35) 110 (36) 113 (39) 102 (34)
 2 54 (19) 57 (19) 58 (20) 37 (12)
Number of previous losses
 1 192 (69) 205 (67) 177 (61) 207 (70)
 2 87 (31) 99 (33) 113 (34) 91 (31)
Anti-Müllerian hormone, ng/ml
 <1.00 38 (14) 34 (11) 24 (8) 20 (7)
 1.00–3.5 152 (55) 148 (49) 136 (47) 148 (50)
 >3.5 88 (32) 119 (39) 127 (44) 129 (43)
a

Values are means ± SD or N (%).

b

Quartile ranges are Q1: 0.10–0.83; Q2: 0.83–0.94; Q3: 0.94–1.05; Q4:1.05–1.51.

Data may not sum to 1171 due to missing data.

EAGeR, Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction.

During follow-up, 797 women became pregnant, 188 experienced a pregnancy loss and 597 experienced a live birth. In unadjusted and adjusted analyses, telomere length was not associated with fecundability (Q4 vs Q1, Model 1 FOR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.76, 1.20; Model 2 FOR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.81, 1.30). Further adjustment for age did not materially change these associations (Q4 vs Q1, Model 3 FOR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.79, 1.27) (Table II). Similarly, the telomere length was not associated with live birth (Q4 vs Q1, Model 3 RR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.85, 1.19) or pregnancy loss (Q4 vs Q1, Model 3 RR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.78, 1.62) in fully adjusted models (Table III). The telomere length was not associated with fecundability, live birth, or pregnancy loss in analyses stratified by age (≥30 vs <30 years) (Table IV). Results did not substantively change when race/ethnicity was omitted from Model 3 (FOR Q4 vs Q1 FOR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.78–1.25; live birth Q4 vs Q1 RR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.84–1.18; pregnancy loss Q4 vs Q1 RR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.76–1.53). Findings were also unchanged in models limited to women with complete telomere length data (n = 1171; Model 3 Q4 vs Q1 FOR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.81–1.29; live birth Q4 vs Q1 Model 3 RR = 1.01; 95% CI = 0.86–1.19; pregnancy loss Q4 vs Q1 Model 3 RR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.75–1.56). Unweighted models for pregnancy loss produced similar estimates to the inverse-probability weighted models (Model 3 Q4 vs Q1 RR = 1.08; 95% CI = 0.74–1.58).

Table II.

Associations of mean leukocyte telomere length and fecundability in the EAGeR trial.

Model 1a
Model 2b
Model 3c
Nd FOR 95% CI FOR 95% CI FOR 95% CI
Per 1k base pairs 797 1.01 0.83 1.23 1.07 0.87 1.30 1.04 0.85 1.27
 Quartile 1 (median = 0.75) 195 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 Q2 (0.89) 203 0.98 0.78 1.23 0.98 0.78 1.24 0.99 0.79 1.24
 Q3 (0.99) 202 1.04 0.82 1.31 1.04 0.82 1.32 1.03 0.82 1.31
 Q4 (1.14) 197 0.96 0.76 1.20 1.03 0.81 1.30 1.00 0.79 1.27
a

Unadjusted model.

b

Multivariable Model 2 adjusted for race/ethnicity, BMI, number of previous losses, number of previous live births, smoking, alcohol consumption, marital status, income and multivitamin use.

c

Multivariable Model 3 adjusted for Model 2 covariates + age.

d

Pregnancies.

Table III.

Associations of mean leukocyte telomere length with pregnancy loss and live birth in the EAGeR trial.

Model 1a
Model 2b
Model 3c
Nd RR 95% CI RR 95% CI RR 95% CI
Live birth
 Per 1k BP 597 1.03 0.89 1.19 1.04 0.91 1.20 1.02 0.89 1.18
 Quartile 1 147 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 Q2 153 0.99 0.84 1.17 0.96 0.82 1.13 0.95 0.81 1.12
 Q3 150 1.02 0.86 1.21 0.99 0.84 1.16 0.98 0.83 1.15
 Q4 147 0.99 0.83 1.18 1.02 0.87 1.21 1.00 0.85 1.19
Ne RR 95% CI RR 95% CI RR 95% CI
Pregnancy lossf
 Per 1k BP 188 1.10 0.80 1.51 1.08 0.78 1.49 1.13 0.82 1.56
 Quartile 1 43 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
 Q2 49 1.04 0.71 1.50 1.01 0.70 1.47 0.99 0.69 1.44
 Q3 49 1.13 0.78 1.63 1.11 0.77 1.61 1.11 0.77 1.61
 Q4 47 1.10 0.76 1.59 1.07 0.74 1.54 1.12 0.78 1.62
a

Unadjusted model.

b

Multivariable Model 2 adjusted for race/ethnicity, BMI, number of previous losses, number of previous live births, smoking, alcohol consumption, marital status, income, multivitamin use.

c

Multivariable Model 3 adjusted for Model 2 + age.

d

Live births.

e

Pregnancy losses.

f

Models include inverse-probability weights to account for selection on pregnancy (n = 797).

Table IV.

Associations of mean leukocyte telomere length and pregnancy outcomes stratified by age in the EAGeR trial.

<30 years
≥30 years
Model 3a Model 3a
Fecundability Nb FOR 95% CI Nb FOR 95% CI
 Quartile (Q)1 112 1 1 1 83 1 1 1
 Q2 123 1.04 0.77 1.42 80 0.91 0.63 1.30
 Q3 128 1.04 0.77 1.40 74 0.96 0.66 1.40
 Q4 144 0.95 0.71 1.28 53 1.12 0.75 1.67
Nc RR 95% CI Nc RR 95% CI
Live birth
 Q1 87 1 1 1 60 1 1 1
 Q2 95 0.98 0.80 1.20 58 0.91 0.70 1.19
 Q3 98 1.01 0.83 1.23 52 0.90 0.69 1.19
 Q4 113 1.04 0.85 1.27 34 0.92 0.68 1.25
Nd RR 95% CI Nd RR 95% CI
Pregnancy losse
 Q1 22 1 1 1 21 1 1 1
 Q2 28 1.25 0.71 2.20 21 0.86 0.49 1.50
 Q3 28 1.36 0.78 2.37 21 1.11 0.64 1.91
 Q4 28 1.22 0.71 2.11 19 1.21 0.69 2.13
a

Model 3 adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, BMI, number of previous losses, number of previous live births, smoking, alcohol consumption, marital status, income, multivitamin use.

b

Pregnancies.

c

Live births.

d

Pregnancy losses.

e

Models include inverse-probability weights to account for selection on pregnancy.

In unadjusted cross-sectional analyses that treated parity as the exposure and telomere length as the outcome, compared to nulliparous women those with one prior live birth had 0.65% (95% CI = −1.47, 2.77%) shorter telomeres and those with two prior live births had 3.68% (95% CI = 1.03, 6.32%) shorter telomeres. However, after adjusting for potential confounders in multivariable models, the mean differences comparing women with one prior live birth (0.01%; 95% CI = −2.12, 2.14%) and two prior live births (2.30%; 95% CI = −0.39, 4.99%) to nulliparous women were largely attenuated.

Discussion

As women delay childbearing in the later reproductive years, identifying biomarkers to improve the prediction of pregnancy outcomes beyond chronological age could greatly improve preconception counseling, particularly among women attempting natural conception. We hypothesized that leukocyte telomere length, as a marker of biologic aging, could serve as one such biomarker. However, in this prospective study of healthy women with a history of 1–2 pregnancy losses, we did not find leukocyte telomere length to be associated with fecundability, pregnancy loss, or live birth, overall or within strata of chronologic age. Although unadjusted models suggested shorter telomeres among women with higher parity, adjustment for age, BMI and other factors largely attenuated this association. Collectively, these findings do not support a role of leukocyte telomere length, an accessible marker of biological aging, in pregnancy establishment or maintenance in a non-clinical population of women attempting to conceive.

Telomere attrition has been hypothesized to play a role in the phenotypic manifestations of reproductive aging including subfertility and pregnancy loss through increased meiotic dysfunction (Keefe et al., 2006, 2007). According to the telomere theory of reproductive senescence, telomere attrition in oocytes likely occurs through at least two mechanisms (Keefe et al., 2006, 2007). First, during oogenesis, oocytes undergo several mitotic divisions that shorten telomeres before they enter meiosis in waves. The oocytes that enter meiosis last during oogenesis, which have undergone a greater number of replication cycles, are also the last to be ovulated in adult life (Polani and Crolla, 1991). Second, reactive oxygen species induce DNA damage that shortens telomeres in the years between oogenesis and ovulation (Liu et al., 2002; Passos and von Zglinicki, 2005). The resulting shortened telomeres of oocytes present in the ovarian cortex during the later reproductive years may contribute to reduced chiasmata, spindle dysmorphology, disrupted chromosome recombination, and genetic abnormalities in embryos, leading to subfertility, pregnancy loss and lower likelihood of live birth.

Despite biological plausibility, epidemiologic studies on telomere length and reproductive outcomes are somewhat sparse and yield conflicting results. In the present study of healthy women attempting natural conception, we did not find any associations of preconception leukocyte telomere length with fecundability, pregnancy loss, or live birth. Several studies in clinical populations, however, reported associations of telomere length or telomerase, the polymerase responsible for telomere maintenance, with IVF treatment (Czamanski-Cohen et al., 2015) and IVF outcomes, including oocyte quality (Cheng et al., 2013), embryonic aneuploidy (Hanson et al., 2021). embryo fragmentation (Keefe et al., 2005; Cheng et al., 2013) and clinical pregnancy (Wang et al., 2014), as well as recurrent miscarriage (Hanna et al., 2009; Thilagavathi et al., 2013). For example, in a small case–control study (n = 30), women undergoing IVF had significantly shorter lymphocyte telomere length than healthy controls (Czamanski-Cohen et al., 2015). In two other small studies among IVF patients, longer telomere length measured in oocytes and cumulus cells were associated with less embryo fragmentation and better oocyte quality (Keefe et al., 2005; Cheng et al., 2013). More recently, another study (n = 175) reported that shorter white blood cell, but not cumulus cell, telomere length was associated with embryonic aneuploidy (Hanson et al., 2021). Likewise, women with recurrent miscarriage had shorter telomeres compared to healthy controls in two additional small case–control studies (Hanna et al., 2009; Thilagavathi et al., 2013). Granulosa cell telomerase activity, but not telomere length, was associated with a higher clinical pregnancy rate in another study of 76 women presenting for IVF (Wang et al., 2014).

The findings of these studies cannot be directly compared with ours but imply that shorter telomeres may be detrimental to pregnancy outcomes. Because women in the EAGeR trial had demonstrated fecundity and were not seeking fertility treatment, many of the intermediate outcomes (e.g. oocyte and embryo quality) evaluated in previous studies are unobservable in a population of women attempting natural conception such as ours. We cannot rule out the possibility that leukocyte telomere length may be related to oocyte and embryo quality in healthy women, but any influence on these intermediate parameters does not translate to reduced fecundability or likelihood of live birth, or higher risk of pregnancy loss, according to our results.

In cross-sectional analyses, we also observed slightly shorter telomeres among women with baseline higher parity among participants of the EAGeR population, though this association was attenuated after adjustment. Similarly, Gray et al. reported shorter telomeres among post-menopausal women with higher parity in crude analyses; however, adjusted models were not presented (Gray et al., 2014). Among women in the cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) study, leukocyte telomere length of parous women was ∼6000 base-pairs shorter than nulliparous women after adjusting for age, BMI, smoking and other factors (Pollack et al., 2018). Finally, a prospective study of 75 Mayan women reported a positive association of number of surviving children and leukocyte telomere length (Barha et al., 2016). Differences in findings between our study population and others may relate, in part, to differences in the study populations themselves, particularly with respect to reproductive history and the underlying age distribution of participants. For example, the mean age of EAGeR participants at baseline was 28.7 years (range = 18.7–40.1), and only 12% were older than 35 years. In contrast, the age of women included in the NHANES analysis ranged from 20 to 44 years, with 37% older than 35 years. Furthermore, EAGeR women had a history of 1–2 pregnancy losses, which could be stressful events that shorten telomeres. Indeed, EAGeR participants had a shorter mean telomere length in our population (nulliparous women mean T/S ratio = 0.95; parous women mean T/S ratio = 0.93) than in NHANES women (nulliparous women mean T/S ratio = 1.17; parous women mean T/S ratio = 1.10) (Pollack et al., 2018).

Strengths of our study include a large sample size and prospective design with preconception measurements of leukocyte telomere length. Furthermore, women enrolled in the EAGeR trial were healthy and had demonstrated fecundity, improving generalizability to women attempting pregnancy without the assistance of fertility treatment. Additionally, the collection of daily urine samples during active follow-up, coupled with augmented β-hCG testing, allowed for the earliest possible detection of pregnancies and pregnancy losses. Finally, follow-up in the EAGeR trial was high (89%), reducing the potential for selection bias arising from loss to follow-up.

Our study also has limitations. First, we quantified telomere length in leukocytes rather than oocytes or cumulus or granulosa cells, which are not accessible among women attempting natural conception. Measurement of granulosa cell, cumulus cell, or oocyte telomere length requires women to undergo egg retrieval, an invasive procedure involving ovarian stimulation, multiple monitoring visits and general anesthesia. In contrast, leukocyte telomere length can be measured non-invasively with a standard blood collection and would, therefore, be a potentially useful biomarker in women seeking unassisted conception. However, telomere length in leukocytes may not reflect telomere length in granulosa or cumulus cells (Lara-Molina et al., 2020) or oocytes, which cannot be measured non-invasively, but may be the more relevant tissues of interest. Second, women in the EAGeR study were relatively young, limiting our ability to evaluate telomere length and pregnancy outcomes at the older end of the age range. Third, residual confounding in measured or unmeasured factors is possible, as in any observational study. Finally, our study sample included women with 1–2 prior pregnancy losses and excluded women with a history of infertility treatment and those with conditions associated with infertility, which importantly extends the literature by examining the relation between telomere length and pregnancy outcomes in a population of women with demonstrated fecundity. Nevertheless, these eligibility criteria may limit generalizability to women with a similar reproductive history, particularly considering the shorter telomere length in our population relative to the NHANES population (Pollack et al., 2018). Relatedly, women in the EAGeR trial identified mostly as non-Hispanic white, limiting our ability to examine associations in other racial and ethnic groups. Because telomere length varies by race/ethnicity (Diez Roux et al., 2009), likely resulting from different cumulative lifetime stressors that affect telomere length, and disparities in fertility and adverse pregnancy outcomes exist (Huddleston et al., 2010; Mukherjee et al., 2013), future studies should examine these relations in more diverse cohorts.

In conclusion, our findings do not support an association of preconception leukocyte telomere length with fecundability, pregnancy loss, or live birth. As such, leukocyte telomere length, a measure of biologic aging, is unlikely to be a useful preconception marker of reproductive outcomes among women attempting natural conception with a history of pregnancy loss.

Data availability

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Authors’ roles

E.F.S., R.M.S. and S.L.M. designed and executed the study. A.C.P.-S. and S.L.M. conducted data analyses and drafted the manuscript. E.F.S., R.M.S., S.L.M., K.K., V.C.A., A.Z.P. and L.A.S. revised the manuscript and participated in the critical discussion of the intellectual content.

Funding

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; contract numbers HHSN267200603423, HHSN267200603424 and HHSN267200603426).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Barha CK, Hanna CW, Salvante KG, Wilson SL, Robinson WP, Altman RM, Nepomnaschy PA.. Number of children and telomere length in women: a prospective, longitudinal evaluation. PLoS One 2016;11:e0146424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Broekmans FJ, Knauff EA, Te Velde ER, Macklon NS, Fauser BC.. Female reproductive ageing: current knowledge and future trends. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2007;18:58–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cheng EH, Chen SU, Lee TH, Pai YP, Huang LS, Huang CC, Lee MS.. Evaluation of telomere length in cumulus cells as a potential biomarker of oocyte and embryo quality. Hum Reprod 2013;28:929–936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cole SR, Hernan MA.. Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. Am J Epidemiol 2008;168:656–664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Craciunas L, Roberts SA, Yates AP, Smith A, Fitzgerald C, Pemberton PW.. Modification of the Beckman–Coulter second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay protocol improves the reliability of serum antimullerian hormone measurement. Fertil Steril 2015;103:554–559.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Czamanski-Cohen J, Sarid O, Cwikel J, Douvdevani A, Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Har-Vardi I.. Cell-free DNA and telomere length among women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015;32:1697–1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DeCherney AH, Berkowitz GS.. Female fecundity and age. N Engl J Med 1982;306:424–426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Diez Roux AV, Ranjit N, Jenny NS, Shea S, Cushman M, Fitzpatrick A, Seeman T.. Race/ethnicity and telomere length in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Aging Cell 2009;8:251–257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dunson DB, Baird DD, Colombo B.. Increased infertility with age in men and women. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:51–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Flannagan KSJ, Mumford SL.. Preconception exposures and postconception outcomes: selection bias in action. Fertil Steril 2020;114:1172–1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gold EB. The timing of the age at which natural menopause occurs. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2011;38:425–440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gray KE, Schiff MA, Fitzpatrick AL, Kimura M, Aviv A, Starr JR.. Leukocyte telomere length and age at menopause. Epidemiology 2014;25:139–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hanna CW, Bretherick KL, Gair JL, Fluker MR, Stephenson MD, Robinson WP.. Telomere length and reproductive aging. Hum Reprod 2009;24:1206–1211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanson BM, Tao X, Zhan Y, Kim JG, Klimczak AM, Herlihy NS, Scott RT, Seli E.. Shorter telomere length of white blood cells is associated with higher rates of aneuploidy among infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2021;115:957–965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huddleston HG, Cedars MI, Sohn SH, Giudice LC, Fujimoto VY.. Racial and ethnic disparities in reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:413–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Keefe DL, Franco S, Liu L, Trimarchi J, Cao B, Weitzen S, Agarwal S, Blasco MA.. Telomere length predicts embryo fragmentation after in vitro fertilization in women – toward a telomere theory of reproductive aging in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1256–1260; discussion 1260–1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Keefe DL, Liu L, Marquard K.. Telomeres and aging-related meiotic dysfunction in women. Cell Mol Life Sci 2007;64:139–143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Keefe DL, Marquard K, Liu L.. The telomere theory of reproductive senescence in women. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006;18:280–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lara-Molina EE, Franasiak JM, Marin D, Tao X, Díaz-Gimeno P, Florensa M, Martin M, Seli E, Pellicer A.. Cumulus cells have longer telomeres than leukocytes in reproductive-age women. Fertil Steril 2020;113:217–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu L, Trimarchi JR, Smith PJ, Keefe DL.. Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to telomere attrition and genomic instability. Aging Cell 2002;1:40–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McGrath M, Wong JYY, Michaud D, Hunter DJ, De Vivo I.. Telomere length, cigarette smoking, and bladder cancer risk in men and women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:815–819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Morin SJ, Tao X, Marin D, Zhan Y, Landis J, Bedard J, Scott RT, Seli E.. DNA methylation-based age prediction and telomere length in white blood cells and cumulus cells of infertile women with normal or poor response to ovarian stimulation. Aging (Albany, NY) 2018;10:3761–3773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mukherjee S, Velez Edwards DR, Baird DD, Savitz DA, Hartmann KE.. Risk of miscarriage among Black women and white women in a US prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2013;177:1271–1278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Passos JF, von Zglinicki T.. Mitochondria, telomeres and cell senescence. Exp Gerontol 2005;40:466–472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Polani PE, Crolla JA.. A test of the production line hypothesis of mammalian oogenesis. Hum Genet 1991;88:64–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pollack AZ, Rivers K, Ahrens KA.. Parity associated with telomere length among US reproductive age women. Hum Reprod 2018;33:736–744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schisterman EF, Silver RM, Lesher LL, Faraggi D, Wactawski-Wende J, Townsend JM, Lynch AM, Perkins NJ, Mumford SL, Galai N.. Preconception low-dose aspirin and pregnancy outcomes: results from the EAGeR randomised trial. Lancet 2014;384:29–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schisterman EF, Silver RM, Perkins NJ, Mumford SL, Whitcomb BW, Stanford JB, Lesher LL, Faraggi D, Wactawski-Wende J, Browne RW. et al. A randomised trial to evaluate the effects of low‐dose aspirin in gestation and reproduction: design and baseline characteristics. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2013;27:598–609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shammas MA. Telomeres, lifestyle, cancer, and aging. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2011;14:28–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Shrier I, Platt RW.. Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs. BMC Med Res Methodol 2008;8:70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith A, Tilling K, Nelson SM, Lawlor DA.. Live-birth rate associated with repeat in vitro fertilization treatment cycles. JAMA 2015;314:2654–2662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Steiner AZ, Pritchard D, Stanczyk FZ, Kesner JS, Meadows JW, Herring AH, Baird DD.. Association between biomarkers of ovarian reserve and infertility among older women of reproductive age. JAMA 2017;318:1367–1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Te Velde ER, Pearson PL.. The variability of female reproductive ageing. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:141–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Thilagavathi J, Mishra SS, Kumar M, Vemprala K, Deka D, Dhadwal V, Dada R.. Analysis of telomere length in couples experiencing idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. J Assist Reprod Genet 2013;30:793–798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang W, Chen H, Li R, Ouyang N, Chen J, Huang L, Mai M, Zhang N, Zhang Q, Yang D.. Telomerase activity is more significant for predicting the outcome of IVF treatment than telomere length in granulosa cells. Reproduction 2014;147:649–657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wu CH, Chen YC, Wu HH, Yang JG, Chang YJ, Tsai HD.. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone predicts ovarian response and cycle outcome in IVF patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 2009;26:383–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zarek SM, Mitchell EM, Sjaarda LA, Mumford SL, Silver RM, Stanford JB, Galai N, Schliep KC, Radin RG, Plowden TC. et al. Antimüllerian hormone and pregnancy loss from the Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction trial. Fertil Steril 2016;105:946–952.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zarek SM, Mitchell EM, Sjaarda LA, Mumford SL, Silver RM, Stanford JB, Galai N, White MV, Schliep KC, DeCherney AH. et al. Is anti-Müllerian hormone associated with fecundability? Findings from the EAGeR Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:4215–4221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.


Articles from Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES