Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2021 Nov 18;59(12):e01446-21. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01446-21

Single-Amplicon Multiplex Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR with Tiled Probes To Detect SARS-CoV-2 spike Mutations Associated with Variants of Concern

Ahmed Babiker a,b,#, Katherine Immergluck a,c,#, Samuel D Stampfer a, Anuradha Rao c,d,e, Leda Bassit c,d,e, Max Su a, Vi Nguyen a,c, Victoria Stittleburg a, Jessica M Ingersoll b,c, Heath L Bradley b, Maud Mavigner c,d, Nils Schoof c,d, Colleen S Kraft a,b, Ann Chahroudi c,d,e, Raymond F Schinazi c,d,e, Greg S Martin c,f, Anne Piantadosi a,b, Wilbur A Lam b,c,g,h, Jesse J Waggoner a,c,i,
Editor: Melissa B Millerj
PMCID: PMC8601233  PMID: 34432488

ABSTRACT

To provide an accessible and inexpensive method to surveil for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mutations, we developed a multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) assay, the Spike single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay, to detect specific mutations in the spike receptor binding domain. A single primer pair was designed to amplify a 348-bp region of spike, and probes were initially designed to detect K417, E484K, and N501Y. The assay was evaluated using characterized variant sample pools and residual nasopharyngeal samples. Variant calls were confirmed by SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing in a subset of samples. Subsequently, a fourth probe was designed to detect L452R. The lower limit of 95% detection was 2.46 to 2.48 log10 genome equivalents (GE)/ml for the three initial targets (∼1 to 2 GE/reaction). Among 253 residual nasopharyngeal swabs with detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA, the Spike SNP assay was positive in 238 (94.1%) samples. All 220 samples with threshold cycle (CT) values of <30 for the SARS-CoV-2 N2 target were detected, whereas 18/33 samples with N2 CT values of ≥30 were detected. Spike SNP results were confirmed by sequencing in 50/50 samples (100%). Addition of the 452R probe did not affect performance for the original targets. The Spike SNP assay accurately identifies SARS-CoV-2 mutations in the receptor binding domain, and it can be quickly modified to detect new mutations that emerge.

KEYWORDS: COVID-19, diagnostics, molecular epidemiology, variants

INTRODUCTION

Viral mutations are a natural phenomenon and a by-product of replication (1). Like other RNA viruses, coronaviruses rely on an error-prone RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) for replication (2). Coronaviruses also encode a 3′-to-5′ exoribonuclease that provides a proofreading function and reduces error rate, resulting in a comparatively low rate of viral mutation (approximately 1 or 2 nucleotides per month) and low sequence diversity (3). While many mutations are inconsequential, over time, mutations that confer a fitness advantage with respect to viral replication, transmission, or escape from immunity will be positively selected (1). Since its identification in China in late 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused more than 167 million infections and more than 3.4 million deaths worldwide (1). With high transmission rates globally, there has been a dramatic increase in the emergence of variants with concerning mutations and phenotypic traits (2, 3). These lineages, many of which share common mutations in the spike protein (e.g., N501Y, E484K and L452R), have been declared variants of concern (VOC) by public health authorities (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant-info.html). Since their emergence, studies have confirmed increased transmissibility and decreased susceptibility to antibody neutralization of strains bearing these mutations compared to those of ancestorial lineages (2, 47).

Global genomic surveillance and rapid, open-source sharing of viral genome sequences have facilitated the detection and tracking of VOC. SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing remains the gold standard to identify circulating variants. However, given the limited availability, technical requirements, and turnaround time for viral genome sequencing, broadly accessible and inexpensive assays would be advantageous to track specific mutations around the world, analogous to the initial use of the S gene target failure to track and monitor the emergence of B.1.1.7 (8, 9). To this end, we designed and validated a single-reaction multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) assay to detect specific mutations associated with VOC, here referred to as the Spike SNP assay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design.

Spike single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) primers and probes were initially designed based on available whole-genome sequences of VOC. The assay was optimized and evaluated using characterized variant sample pools. Finally, clinical evaluation was performed by testing a convenience set of clinical samples in the Spike SNP assay and a comparator SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR assay. Mutation calls were evaluated by SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing in a subset of samples.

Spike SNP design and optimization.

The Spike SNP assay was designed from an alignment of all whole-genome sequences of B.1.351 and P.1 variants that were uploaded into the GISAID database between 1 September 2020, and 4 February 2021. Sequences were downloaded into Geneious Prime software (version 2021.1.1) and aligned to the reference strain hCoV-19/USA/WA1/2020 (GenBank accession number MN985325.1). Target regions for primer design in the spike gene were selected manually by identifying fully conserved regions 5′ to codon 417 (forward primer) and 3′ to codon 501 (reverse primer). Primers and probes were designed in Primer3 (version 4.1.0; https://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3/). Probes were designed for SNPs that confer mutations at amino acids 417, 484, and 501 in spike, with the goal of positioning the SNP in the middle of the probe. Probe sequences from Primer3 were entered into OligoAnalyzer (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA) and altered to (i) include 3 consecutive locked nucleic acids (LNAs) centered on the SNP and (ii) shorten probe length to maintain the predicted melting temperature. An unmodified probe for 452R was later designed using similar methodology. Candidate probes were manually redesigned based on Primer3 results to have melting temperatures similar to those of the LNA probes.

Singleplex assays were initially evaluated using SARS-CoV-2 RNA and each primer/probe set with 400 nM each primer and 200 nM probe in the final reaction mixture. PCR cycling conditions were optimized to improve signal differentiation between variant and nonvariant strains. Probes were then combined sequentially, and each multiplex assay was compared side-by-side with the component singleplex assays (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). As no change in threshold cycle (CT) value or fluorescence was observed in the multiplex design during optimization, the Spike SNP assay was further evaluated only as a multiplex test, with probes for the targeted mutations labeled with the following fluorophores: for K417, fluorescein (FAM); 484K, cyanine 5 (Cy5); 501Y, 6-carboxy-2,4,4,5,7,7-hexachlorofluorescein (HEX); and for 452R, Cal Fluor red 610 (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Spike SNP assay primers and probes

Primer or probe name Sequencea Concn (nM)b Location (5′–3′)c
Primers
    SpikeSNP Ext TGAAGTCAGACAAATCGCTCC 400 22777–22797
    SpikeSNP R1 TGGTGCATGTAGAAGTTCAAAAG 400 23103–23125
LNA probes
    K417 5′-FAM-CAAACTGGA+A+A+G+ATTGCTG-IABkFQ-3′ 200 22802–22820
    484K 5′-Cy5-ACCTTGTAATGGTGT+T+A+AAGGTTTT-IAbRQSp-3′ 200 22996–23020
    501Y 5′-HEX-CCCAC+T+T+ATGGTGTTGG-IABkFQ-3′ 200 23057–23073
Unmodified probes
    452R 5′-CFR610-ATAATTACCGGTATAGATTGTTTAGGAAGT-BHQ-2-3′ 200 22908–22937
a

Probe sequences are listed in the following order: 5′-fluorophore-sequence-quencher-3′. A plus sign (+) before a base indicates a locked nucleic acid; underlined and boldfaced bases indicate targeted single-nucleotide change. BHQ, black hole quencher; HEX, 6-carboxy-2,4,4,5,7,7-hexachlorofluorescein; CFR610, Cal Fluor red 610; Cy5, cyanine 5; FAM, fluorescein; IABkFQ and IAbRQSp, Iowa Black quenchers.

b

Concentration in the final reaction mixture.

c

Nucleotide location in the Wuhan-Hu-1 complete genome sequence (NCBI reference sequence accession number NC_045512.2).

rRT-PCR performance.

Clinical samples were extracted on either an EMAG (bioMérieux, Durham, NC) or an Abbott m2000sp (Abbott, Chicago, IL) instrument. All variant sample pools were extracted on the EMAG instrument. Nucleic acids were extracted from 500 μl of nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs or from 100 μl of variant sample pools and eluted in 50 μl. All rRT-PCRs were performed on a Rotor-Gene Q instrument (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) using 20-μl reaction mixtures of the Luna probe one-step reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) and 5 μl of nucleic acid eluate. Samples were tested with a duplex reaction for the SARS-CoV-2 N2 target and RNase P (referred to as N2-RP) and with the Spike SNP assay. N2-RP was performed using the primer and probe concentrations described previously (10). The Spike SNP assay was performed on a separate run with the following conditions: 52°C for 15 min, 94°C for 2 min, and 45 cycles of 94°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s. Fluorescent signal was acquired in all channels at 60°C. Thresholds were established for each channel during assay optimization, as described previously (11), and used for analysis of all subsequent runs. During Spike SNP analysis, outlier removal was performed to remove any signal that did not reach 10% (K417) or 20% (484K and 501Y) of the maximum fluorescence in a given channel.

Reference strains and variant sample pools.

Extracted SARS-CoV-2 RNA from cultured strains of B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 were used for assay evaluation and optimization. Following 1 or 2 passages in cell culture, variants were confirmed by sequencing prior to testing in the Spike SNP assay. Inactivated variant sample pools were obtained through the NIH/RADx Variant Task Force for the following variants: B.1.1.7, B.1.2, B.1.351, B.1.375, B.1.427, B.1.429, B.1.525, B.1.526, P.1, and P.2 (Table 2). Briefly, inactivated samples in saline from sequence-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 variants were provided by Helix (San Mateo, CA). Samples were matched based on lineage and specific mutations in spike, and pools were made from a combination of samples, followed by dilution and aliquoting. Initial pools were extracted and tested in the N2-RP rRT-PCR assay. Dilution series (5- or 10-fold, based on initial CT) were prepared, coded, and tested in a blind fashion in the N2-RP and Spike SNP rRT-PCR assays. Dilutions of BEI 52286 were included as a wild-type control.

TABLE 2.

CT values for dilution series of pooled variant samples in the N2RP and Spike SNP assays, with expected Spike SNP results shown for each variant

Variant Concn (log10 genome equivalents/ml)a CT value for:
N2 Spike SNP assay
K417 484K 501Y
B.1.1.7 (K417, 501Y) 6.5 21.24 25.95 25.18
5.5 25.69 30.03 29.27
4.5 29.59 35.45 34.58
3.5 33.03 38.27 37.51
2.5 35.23
1.5
B.1.2 (K417) 4.5 28.59 33.40
4.2 29.69 34.13
3.5 32.12 38.07
2.8 34.89
2.0 37.53
B.1.351 (484K, 501Y) 4.7 27.77 32.86 31.50
4.3 29.38 34.31 32.95
3.6 31.88 38.47 37.41
2.7 35.15
1.7
B.1.375 (K417) 4.5 28.59 34.70
3.5 31.72 36.04
2.5 35.50 41.48
1.5 40.31
B.1.427 (K417) 7.1 18.76 23.44
6.1 22.69 27.58
5.1 27.03 32.45
4.1 30.87 36.43
3.1 35.45 39.40
2.1
B.1.429 (K417) 5.8 23.85 28.58
4.5 28.31 33.35
3.1 33.46 37.10
2.1
B.1.525 (K417, 484K) 6.2 22.39 27.00 27.43
5.2 25.98 30.81 31.41
4.2 30.71 36.18 36.60
3.2 34.52 40.43 40.84
2.2 40.50 40.97
1.2
B.1.526 (K417, 484K) 6.3 21.77 26.26 29.37
5.3 26.54 31.22 33.96
4.3 29.83 35.47 38.69
3.3 33.23 39.27 41.38
2.3 37.65
P.1 (484K, 501Y) 5.8 23.71 28.70 27.21
4.8 27.67 32.78 31.40
3.8 32.70 37.90 36.61
2.8 34.67
1.8
P.2 (K417, 484K) 5.8 23.67 27.67 28.34
4.8 27.85 31.98 32.55
3.8 31.58 36.00 36.48
2.8 35.19 39.75 40.24
1.8
BEI 52286 (K417) 7.1 18.93 22.94
6.1 24.11 28.24
5.1 28.00 31.99
4.1 31.83 36.34
3.1 36.60 39.39
2.1 36.44 39.31
1.1
a

Calculated from a standard curve of quantitative synthetic RNA (catalog no. NR-52358; BEI).

Analytical evaluation.

Linearity and lower limit of 95% detection (95% LLOD) of the Spike SNP assay were determined for each target using quantified genomic RNA from B.1.1.7 and B.1.526 variant sample pools. RNA was quantified in genome equivalents per milliliter on a single run of the N2-RP assay with a standard curve of quantitative synthetic RNA (catalog no. NR-52358; BEI Resources, Manassas, VA). Linearity and 95% LLOD were then evaluated on a single run of the Spike SNP assay by testing 5 serial 10-fold dilutions of each strain in quadruplicate, ensuring that <4/4 replicates were detected for at least one dilution. The 95% LLOD was calculated by probit analysis.

Clinical evaluation.

Residual SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive NP samples were obtained from the Emory Hospital Laboratory. Samples included in the current analysis were collected from adults in the Emory Healthcare System between 1 January and 31 March 2021. NP swabs had originally been collected into saline or viral transport medium. Once collected, samples were deidentified, aliquoted, and stored at −80°C until nucleic acid extraction. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Emory Institutional Review Board (STUDY00000260).

Sequence analysis.

Genome sequencing of RNA from clinical samples was performed as previously described (12). Genomes were aligned to a reference genome using Geneious Prime software (version 2021.1.1). Spike SNP calls were compared to the aligned whole-genome sequences for confirmation.

Statistical analysis.

Basic statistical analyses were performed using Prism version 9.0.2 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). The 95% LLOD was calculated by probit analysis using MedCalc version 19.8 (MedCalc Software Ltd., Ostend, Belgium).

RESULTS

Spike SNP assay target in silico evaluation.

The Spike SNP assay amplifies a 348-bp region of spike using a single primer set and probes for specific mutations tiled across the amplicon, which encompasses codons 413 to 514 between the primer sequences. This region contains the receptor-binding motif of spike protein found at the distal aspect of the receptor-binding domain (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Probes using locked nucleic acids (LNAs) centered on specific mutations to selectively detect sequences encoding K417 (reference), E484K (GAA→AAA), and N501Y (AAU→UAU). The nonvariant 417 sequence was targeted to yield (i) signal dropout for B.1.351 (AAG→AAU) and P.1 (AAG→ACG) variants, which harbor distinct mutations in this codon, and (ii) positive-control signals for strains bearing no mutations in targeted codons. Representative results from testing specific SARS-CoV-2 variants, along with result interpretation, are shown in Fig. 1.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Spike SNP assay distinguishes mutations occurring in different lineages. (A to C) Representative results of variant detection from a single Spike SNP run are shown for mutations in the codons for K417 (A) and mutations that encode 484K (B) and 501Y (C). Curves show dilutions of the following variants: blue, BEI 52286 (wild type); pink, B.1.1.7; purple, B.1.525; green, P.1. Variant pools were used for B.1.1.7, B.1.525, and P.1 strains. Curves are displayed for a given dilution in each channel. (D) Result interpretation.

An in silico evaluation of Spike SNP primers and probes was performed using a set of 382 complete genome sequences from the state of Georgia. In total, 380 sequences completely matched the forward primer sequence (99.48%), and 381 completely matched the reverse primer (99.74%). Two and one sequences harbored a single base pair difference compared to the forward and reverse primers, respectively. No mutations were identified in probe target regions that would alter the identification of targeted SNPs.

Analytical evaluation and testing of variant sample pools.

Linearity and the lower limit of 95% detection of the Spike SNP assay were evaluated with dilution series of quantified genomic RNA from variant pools of B.1.1.7 and B.1.526 (Fig. 2A to F). The linear range of the assay extended from 3.3 to 6.3 log10 genome equivalents (GE)/ml for the K417 and 501Y targets (B.1.1.7 pool) and from 3.2 to 6.2 log10 GE/ml for the K417 and 484K targets (B.1.526 pool). The highest concentrations tested for B.1.1.7 and B.1.526 in this analysis were 6.3 and 6.2 GE/ml, respectively. The lower limit of 95% detection in log10 GE/ml was estimated by probit analysis to be 2.46, 2.54, and 2.48 for the K417, 484K, and 501Y targets, respectively. These values correlate to ∼1 to 2 GE/reaction.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Spike SNP assay linearity and limit of detection. Linearity and limit of detection of K417 (A and B), 484K (C and D), and 501Y (E and F) in the Spike SNP assay were established using 10-fold dilutions of quantified pools of B.1.1.7 (K417 and 501Y) and B.1.526 (K417 and 484K). Amplification curves (A, C, and E) and graphs of threshold cycle (CT) values versus concentration (B, D, and F) are displayed for each probe. (G) Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 detection with the Spike SNP assay compared to detection of the N2 target using dilution series of 11 pools of variant and wild-type strains. Results are expressed as the percentage of pools detected within a given concentration range. Numbers above the graph represent the number of pools tested. Viral loads were calculated from N2 CT values and a standard curve of BEI quantitative synthetic RNA.

Sample pools were prepared for the following 10 SARS-CoV-2 variants: B.1.1.7, B.1.2, B.1.351, B.1.375, B.1.427, B.1.429, B.1.525, B.1.526, P.1, and P.2 (Table 2). Dilution series of variant pools plus one nonvariant strain (BEI 52286) were tested in a blind fashion in the N2-RP and Spike SNP assays. The Spike SNP assay accurately detected the expected mutations in all strains at concentrations of ≥3.0 log10 GE/ml (Fig. 2G and Table 2). Of 11 dilutions tested at concentrations of 2 to 3 log10 GE/ml, Spike SNP detected 4 (36.4%), compared to 10 (91.1%) detected in the N2-RP assay.

Clinical evaluation.

A total of 262 residual NP swabs were tested side by side with the N2-RP and Spike SNP rRT-PCR assays, such that all results were available on the same day as sample processing and no additional freeze-thaw was necessary. Of these, 253/262 samples (96.6%) had detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the N2-RP assay, with a median N2 CT of 20.3 (range, 10.8 to 37.9). All samples gave the expected signal for the RNase P specimen control. The Spike SNP assay detected a positive signal in at least one channel in 238/253 (94.1%) N2-positive samples and gave a negative result for 15 (5.9%). N2 CT values were significantly higher in samples that tested negative in the Spike SNP assay (median, 35.2; range, 31.3 to 37.9) compared to those that tested positive (median, 20.0; range, 10.8 to 35.9; P < 0.0001; Fig. 3A). All samples with N2 CT values of <30 (220/220) were detected in the Spike SNP assay, whereas 18/33 samples with N2 CT values of ≥30 were detected (Fig. 3B).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Clinical evaluation of the Spike SNP assay. (A) SARS-CoV-2 N2 CT values for clinical samples that tested positive or negative in the Spike SNP assay (****, P < 0.0001). (B) Distribution of clinical samples tested and the percentage detected in the Spike SNP assay based on an N2 CT value cutoff of 30.

Results from the Spike SNP assay were consistent with SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing for 50/50 samples (100%) with complete genome sequences (Table 3). Notably, two samples from one patient had signal for E484K (2/2) and N501Y (1/2), which were not identified in the consensus. Upon review of all reads from these samples, the mutations were found as minor variants in 20 to 45% of reads.

TABLE 3.

Results of the Spike SNP clinical evaluation based on availability of whole-genome sequence data

Characteristicsa Results with:
Sequence confirmed No sequence data
Total no. 50 212
N2 target positive 50 (100) 203 (95.8)
    N2 CT, mean (SD) 18.95 (4.00) 21.66 (6.58)
Spike SNP positive 50 (100) 188 (88.7)
    K417 49 (98.0) 188 (100)
    484K 6 (12.0) 6 (3.2)
    501Y 15 (30.0) 6 (3.2)
a

Data are displayed as n (%) unless otherwise noted.

Modification to detect emerging mutations.

During the evaluation of the Spike SNP assay, an unmodified probe (without LNAs) was designed in response to the emergence of 452R (CUG→CGG) in the amplified region (Table 1). The probe was designed without modification to hasten production and evaluate assay specificity with standard chemistries. The 452R probe was incorporated into the existing Spike SNP triplex, and variant pools were used to evaluate probe performance over two runs on a single day following receipt of the probe. Addition of the 452R probe had no effect on CT values for the other three probes in the Spike SNP assay (Fig. 4) and demonstrated specific detection of 452R in B.1.427 and B.1.429 variant pools, as well as in four clinical samples known to carry that mutation.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Addition of 452R probe does not affect signal from other Spike SNP probes. (A to D) Curves generated from probes for K417 (A), 452R (B), 484K (C), and 501Y (D) are displayed from a single run that included the Spike SNP assay without the 452R probe (panels A, C, and D; dashed curves), the 452R singleplex assay (panel B; dashed curve), or the Spike SNP assay with the 452R probe (solid curves). Variants tested included BEI 52286 (blue), B.1.427 (orange), B.1.351 (purple), and B.1.1.7 (green).

DISCUSSION

The rapid development and distribution of diagnostics has been an integral component of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic response to date and will remain essential in the response to emerging variants (13). Here, we developed and validated a single-step multiplex rRT-PCR for the detection of spike SNPs harbored by SARS-CoV-2 VOC. The assay demonstrated an analytical sensitivity correlating to a limit of detection ∼1 to 2 GE/reaction, excellent clinical performance, including detection of samples with N2 CT values of >30, and perfect concordance with SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing.

Mutations in the spike protein such as N501Y (present in B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1) and E484K (present in B.1.351, B.1.525, B.1.526, B.1.620, B.1.621, P.1, P.2 and P.3), among others, are likely driving worrisome phenotypes seen with emerging variants (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant-info.html). In particular, N501Y has been shown to increase binding affinity to human ACE2, leading to increased infectivity (14), while E484K has been shown to decrease neutralization by monoclonal antibodies, as well as that by convalescent and postvaccine sera (1417). The Spike SNP assay was designed to amplify a 348-bp region of the spike receptor-binding domain in a single amplicon with two primers located in conserved flanking regions. Probes were then tiled across the amplicon to specifically detect 484K and 501Y, as well as mutations in codon 417.

To provide sensitive discrimination of single-nucleotide difference, we initially designed Spike SNP probes with LNA monomers (18). LNA-DNA binding exhibits increased affinity and specificity compared to DNA-DNA binding, thereby increasing melting temperatures, allowing for shorter probe lengths and preserved discrimination of single-base-pair mismatches (19). Furthermore, LNA-probes can be designed to optimize specific SNP detection with minimal loss of assay sensitivity. As the thermodynamic effects of LNAs are localized within one nucleotide of the LNA modification, discriminatory power is generally highest with three LNAs in sequence and the mismatch target as the middle nucleotide (18). Unmodified probes were also designed to rapidly detect emerging SARS-CoV-2 mutations. These demonstrated similar analytical performance to LNA probes and present an option for future assay customization. New probe designs will therefore need to balance the shorter probe length afforded by LNAs with increased availability of unmodified probes.

The simple design of the SNP assay provides consistent amplification of the target region, limits the potential for amplicon dropout from mutations in the primer sequences, and facilitates the addition of new probes to detect emerging mutations identified among SARS-CoV-2 variants (e.g., L452R). Indeed, no difference in assay results were observed with the sequential addition of probes during assay development (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) or the later addition of an unmodified probe for 452R detection (Fig. 4). An advantage of our assay and others that screen for SNPs (20, 21), rather than deletions (22, 23), is the specificity of these SNPs relative to the phenotypes of concern. Furthermore, our single-reaction multiplex design, which can be run in parallel or as reflex to a positive RT-PCR, is of importance when considering scalability and implementation into existing workflows, allowing for faster turnaround times and reagent conservation. The Spike SNP and N2RP assays are currently run in parallel in our research laboratory, providing results within 2 h of assay setup. This contrasts with multistep processes and assays described by others (24, 25). One could envision a real-word clinical use scenario where the Spike SNP assay is performed in a reflex manner for all SARS-CoV-2-positive samples, regardless of CT value. However, if no signal was detected in any of the SNP assay channels (including the positive control, K417) for the SNP assay, results would not be released so as to not falsely assure interpreting clinicians.

Rapid sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 offers the ability to detect new emerging variants in near-real time. Despite concerted national efforts to increase genomic surveillance, most states lag behind the estimated 5% sequencing threshold required to detect emerging strains when they are less than 1% of all strains in a population (26, 27). Moreover, the global use and application of genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 remains highly varied, with many countries having no sequence data uploaded to GISAID (28, 29). This highlights the profound disparities in the ability to sequence genomes and the acute need for an assay which can be run on existing lab infrastructure. Even at centers with access to genomic technologies, recovery of a full genome and variant calling can be restricted by sample viral load (12). This may limit the ability to perform surveillance among cases that present later in their disease course or in those who develop infection after vaccination or natural infection, where partial immune protection may lead to lower viral loads (30). Our assay, along with others (20, 21, 23), represents an important and efficacious step toward an equitable global response to emerging variants.

RT-PCRs for VOC may also serve as an adjunct to enhance sequencing efforts. Although care must be taken to not overly bias genomic surveillance, such assays can be applied as a screening step to select samples for further sequencing and VOC confirmation, as performed in our research laboratory. A screening strategy in which positive samples, in addition to a proportion of negative samples (to allow for detection of novel mutations and VOC), are selected for sequencing would allow centers to enrich samples of interest and capitalize on existing sequencing infrastructure. In California, use of a targeted SNP assay allowed for real-time surveillance of the emergence of variants harboring the L452R mutation (20). In addition to surveillance efforts, such assays may have a role in clinical decision making. Due to the rise of E484K and the inability of clinical labs to screen for this mutation, the Food and Drug Administration revoked the emergency use authorization of bamlanivimab when administered alone (https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-revokes-emergency-use-authorization-monoclonal-antibody-bamlanivimab). Here, application of a E484K SNP assay could allow for the selection of appropriate monoclonal antibodies, akin to the role of HIV genotyping in antiretroviral regimen selection.

The limitations of this work include targeting one region of the genome for amplification and identification of mutations. While our assay targets important mutations in spike, this cannot provide phylogenetic and other comprehensive information gained through sequencing. In addition, sporadic E484K and N501Y mutations may be present and may not necessarily be indicative of VOC; however, these mutations are likely still of phenotypic significance. This is evidenced by repeated convergent evolution of tolerable mutations such as E484K and N501Y. The set of clinically significant mutations in this region continues to increase and highlights the utility of the Spike SNP design, where probe sets can be quickly modified and adapted for relevant emerging SNPs. Multiplexing in this region, however, will be limited by the number of fluorophores that can be detected by most real-time PCR instruments (4 or 5), as well as by the inherent constrains of tiling probes within a given region. These limitations were avoided in the current design, which targets a limited number of key nonoverlapping mutations to be detected by probes of restricted length and similar annealing temperatures. With the emergence of mutations nearer to one another (e.g., 478K and 490S), implementing laboratories may need to select the most informative probe sets for their specific region.

Detection and surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 variants is of great public health importance. While sequencing remains the gold standard, broadly accessible and inexpensive assays are needed to enhance variant surveillance and detection worldwide. Here, we describe the development and validation of a highly sensitive and specific assay for the detection and surveillance of mutations in the spike receptor-binding motif. Centered around a methodology ubiquitous to clinical labs offering SARS-CoV-2 testing, the Spike SNP assay can be adapted and implemented widely to greatly increase the capacity for detection of these mutations.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We recognize our colleagues at the Emory University Healthcare Microbiology, Molecular, and Referral laboratories, who have worked tirelessly to provide necessary care to our patients during this time. We also thank ACME-POCT staff and collaborators, the General Clinical Research Center, and Candace Miller for their contributions and effort to make this project possible.

Funding was provided by National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering grant U54 EB027690 02S1 (G.S.M. and W.A.L.), National Institutes of Health grant UL1 TR002378 (G.S.M. and W.A.L.), Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Clinical Scientist Development Award 2019089 (J.J.W.), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contract 75D30121C10084 (A.P.), Emory Woodruff Health Sciences Center COVID-19 CURE Award (A.P.), and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases under award T32AI074492 (S.D.S.).

Author contributions were as follows. Conceptualization: A.B., K.I., S.D.S., A.R., L.B., A.P., J.J.W. Methodology: A.B., K.I., A.R., L.B., M.S., V.N., V.S., J.M.I., M.M., N.S., C.S.K., A.C., A.P., J.J.W. Investigation: A.B., K.I., S.D.S., A.R., L.B., M.S., V.N., V.S., J.M.I., H.L.B., M.M., N.S., C.S.K., A.C., G.S.M., A.P., W.A.L., J.J.W. Visualization: A.B., J.J.W. Funding acquisition: A.B., R.F.S., G.S.M., A.P., W.A.L., J.J.W. Project administration: A.B., K.I., A.R., L.B., G.S.M., A.P., W.A.L., J.J.W. Supervision: C.S.K., A.C., R.F.S., G.S.M., A.P., W.A.L., J.J.W. Writing—original draft: A.B., K.I., M.S., J.J.W. Writing—review & editing: A.B., K.I., S.D.S., A.R., L.B., M.S., V.N., J.M.I., H.L.B., M.M., N.S., C.S.K., A.C., R.F.S., G.S.M., A.P., W.A.L., J.J.W.

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 1
Fig. S1 and S2. Download jcm.01446-21-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.4 MB (431.5KB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Jesse J. Waggoner, Email: jjwaggo@emory.edu.

Melissa B. Miller, UNC School of Medicine

REFERENCES

  • 1.Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. 2020. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis 20:533–534. 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30120-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Davies NG, Abbott S, Barnard RC, Jarvis CI, Kucharski AJ, Munday JD, Pearson CAB, Russell TW, Tully DC, Washburne AD, Wenseleers T, Gimma A, Waites W, Wong KLM, van Zandvoort K, Silverman JD, Diaz-Ordaz K, Keogh R, Eggo RM, Funk S, Jit M, Atkins KE, Edmunds WJ, COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium. 2021. Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England. Science 372:eabg3055. 10.1126/science.abg3055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tegally H, Wilkinson E, Giovanetti M, Iranzadeh A, Fonseca V, Giandhari J, Doolabh D, Pillay S, San EJ, Msomi N, Mlisana K, von Gottberg A, Walaza S, Allam M, Ismail A, Mohale T, Glass AJ, Engelbrecht S, Van Zyl G, Preiser W, Petruccione F, Sigal A, Hardie D, Marais G, Hsiao N-y, Korsman S, Davies M-A, Tyers L, Mudau I, York D, Maslo C, Goedhals D, Abrahams S, Laguda-Akingba O, Alisoltani-Dehkordi A, Godzik A, Wibmer CK, Sewell BT, Lourenço J, Alcantara LCJ, Kosakovsky Pond SL, Weaver S, Martin D, Lessells RJ, Bhiman JN, Williamson C, de Oliveira T. 2021. Detection of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in South Africa. Nature 592:438–443. 10.1038/s41586-021-03402-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Edara VV, Norwood C, Floyd K, Lai L, Davis-Gardner ME, Hudson WH, Mantus G, Nyhoff LE, Adelman MW, Fineman R, Patel S, Byram R, Gomes DN, Michael G, Abdullahi H, Beydoun N, Panganiban B, McNair N, Hellmeister K, Pitts J, Winters J, Kleinhenz J, Usher J, O’Keefe JB, Piantadosi A, Waggoner JJ, Babiker A, Stephens DS, Anderson EJ, Edupuganti S, Rouphael N, Ahmed R, Wrammert J, Suthar MS. 2021. Infection- and vaccine-induced antibody binding and neutralization of the B.1.351 SARS-CoV-2 variant. Cell Host Microbe 29:516–521.e3. 10.1016/j.chom.2021.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Galloway SE, Paul P, MacCannell DR, Johansson MA, Brooks JT, MacNeil A, Slayton RB, Tong S, Silk BJ, Armstrong GL, Biggerstaff M, Dugan VG. 2021. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage—United States, December 29, 2020–January 12, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 70:95–99. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7003e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Volz E, Mishra S, Chand M, Barrett JC, Johnson R, Geidelberg L, Hinsley WR, Laydon DJ, Dabrera G, O’Toole Á, Amato R, Ragonnet-Cronin M, Harrison I, Jackson B, Ariani CV, Boyd O, Loman NJ, McCrone JT, Gonçalves S, Jorgensen D, Myers R, Hill V, Jackson DK, Gaythorpe K, Groves N, Sillitoe J, Kwiatkowski DP, Flaxman S, Ratmann O, Bhatt S, Hopkins S, Gandy A, Rambaut A, Ferguson NM. 2021. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England: insights from linking epidemiological and genetic data. medRxiv 10.1101/2020.12.30.20249034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang P, Casner RG, Nair MS, Wang M, Yu J, Cerutti G, Liu L, Kwong PD, Huang Y, Shapiro L, Ho DD. 2021. Increased resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variant P.1 to antibody neutralization. bioRxiv 10.1101/2021.03.01.433466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Public Health England. 2020. Investigation of novel SARS-CoV-2 variant 202012/01. Technical Briefing 2.
  • 9.Washington NL, White S, Barrett KMS, Cirulli ET, Bolze A, Lu JT. 2020. S gene dropout patterns in SARS-CoV-2 tests suggest spread of the H69del/V70del mutation in the US. medRxiv 10.1101/2020.12.24.20248814. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Waggoner JJ, Stittleburg V, Pond R, Saklawi Y, Sahoo MK, Babiker A, Hussaini L, Kraft CS, Pinsky BA, Anderson EJ, Rouphael N. 2020. Triplex real-time RT-PCR for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Emerg Infect Dis 26:1633–1635. 10.3201/eid2607.201285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Waggoner JJ, Gresh L, Mohamed-Hadley A, Ballesteros G, Davila MJ, Tellez Y, Sahoo MK, Balmaseda A, Harris E, Pinsky BA. 2016. Single-reaction multiplex reverse transcription PCR for detection of Zika, chikungunya, and dengue viruses. Emerg Infect Dis 22:1295–1297. 10.3201/eid2207.160326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Babiker A, Bradley HL, Stittleburg VD, Ingersoll JM, Key A, Kraft CS, Waggoner JJ, Piantadosi A. 2020. Metagenomic sequencing to detect respiratory viruses in persons under investigation for COVID-19. J Clin Microbiol 59:e02142-20. 10.1128/JCM.02142-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Babiker A, Myers CW, Hill CE, Guarner J. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 testing: trials and tribulations. Am J Clin Pathol 153:706–708. 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nelson G, Buzko O, Spilman P, Niazi K, Rabizadeh S, Soon-Shiong P. 2021. Molecular dynamic simulation reveals E484K mutation enhances spike RBD-ACE2 affinity and the combination of E484K, K417N and N501Y mutations (501Y.V2 variant) induces conformational change greater than N501Y mutant alone, potentially resulting in an escape mutant. bioRxiv 10.1101/2021.01.13.426558. [DOI]
  • 15.Widera M, Wilhelm A, Hoehl S, Pallas C, Kohmer N, Wolf T, Rabenau HF, Corman V, Drosten C, Vehreschild MJGT, Goetsch U, Gottschalk R, Ciesek S. 2021. Bamlanivimab does not neutralize two SARS-CoV-2 variants carrying E484K in vitro. J Infect Dis 10.1093/infdis/jiab355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jangra S, Ye C, Rathnasinghe R, Stadlbauer D, Alshammary H, Amoako AA, Awawda MH, Beach KF, Bermúdez-González MC, Chernet RL, Eaker LQ, Ferreri ED, Floda DL, Gleason CR, Kleiner G, Jurczyszak D, Matthews JC, Mendez WA, Mulder LCF, Russo KT, Salimbangon A-BT, Saksena M, Shin AS, Sominsky LA, Srivastava K, Krammer F, Simon V, Martinez-Sobrido L, García-Sastre A, Schotsaert M. 2021. SARS-CoV-2 spike E484K mutation reduces antibody neutralisation. Lancet Microbe 2:e283–e284. 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00068-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Collier DA, De Marco A, Ferreira IATM, Meng B, Datir RP, Walls AC, Kemp SA, Bassi J, Pinto D, Silacci-Fregni C, Bianchi S, Tortorici MA, Bowen J, Culap K, Jaconi S, Cameroni E, Snell G, Pizzuto MS, Pellanda AF, Garzoni C, Riva A, Baker S, Dougan G, Hess C, Kingston N, Lehner PJ, Lyons PA, Matheson NJ, Owehand WH, Saunders C, Summers C, Thaventhiran JED, Toshner M, Weekes MP, Bucke A, Calder J, Canna L, Domingo J, Elmer A, Fuller S, Harris J, Hewitt S, Kennet J, Jose S, Kourampa J, Meadows A, O’Brien C, Price J, Publico C, Rastall R, COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium. 2021. Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 to mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies. Nature 593:136–141. 10.1038/s41586-021-03412-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Petersen M, Bondensgaard K, Wengel J, Jacobsen JP. 2002. Locked nucleic acid (LNA) recognition of RNA: NMR solution structures of LNA:RNA hybrids. J Am Chem Soc 124:5974–5982. 10.1021/ja012288d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.You Y, Moreira BG, Behlke MA, Owczarzy R. 2006. Design of LNA probes that improve mismatch discrimination. Nucleic Acids Res 34:e60. 10.1093/nar/gkl175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang H, Miller JA, Verghese M, Sibai M, Solis D, Mfuh KO, Jiang B, Iwai N, Mar M, Huang C, Yamamoto F, Sahoo MK, Zehnder J, Pinsky BA. 2021. Multiplex SARS-CoV-2 genotyping RT-PCR for population-level variant screening and epidemiologic surveillance. J Clin Microbiol 59:e00859-21. 10.1128/JCM.00859-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Banada P, Green R, Banik S, Chopoorian A, Streck D, Jones R, Chakravorty S, Alland D. 2021. A simple RT-PCR melting temperature assay to rapidly screen for widely circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants. medRxiv 10.1101/2021.03.05.21252709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Korukluoglu G, Kolukirik M, Bayrakdar F, Ozgumus GG, Altas AB, Cosgun Y, Ketre Kolukirik CZ. 2021. 40 Minutes RT-qPCR assay for screening spike N501Y and HV69-70del mutations. bioRxiv 10.1101/2021.01.26.428302. [DOI]
  • 23.Vogels CBF, Breban MI, Ott IM, Alpert T, Petrone ME, Watkins AE, Kalinich CC, Earnest R, Rothman JE, Goes de Jesus J, Morales Claro I, Magalhães Ferreira G, Crispim MAE, Singh L, Tegally H, Anyaneji UJ, Hodcroft EB, Mason CE, Khullar G, Metti J, Dudley JT, MacKay MJ, Nash M, Wang J, Liu C, Hui P, Murphy S, Neal C, Laszlo E, Landry ML, Muyombwe A, Downing R, Razeq J, de Oliveira T, Faria NR, Sabino EC, Neher RA, Fauver JR, Grubaugh ND, Brazil-UK CADDE Genomic Network, Network for Genomic Surveillance in South Africa. 2021. Multiplex qPCR discriminates variants of concern to enhance global surveillance of SARS-CoV-2. PLoS Biol 19:e3001236. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bal A, Destras G, Gaymard A, Stefic K, Marlet J, Eymieux S, Regue H, Semanas Q, d’Aubarede C, Billaud G, Laurent F, Gonzalez C, Mekki Y, Valette M, Bouscambert M, Gaudy-Graffin C, Lina B, Morfin F, Josset L. 2021. Two-step strategy for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 and other variants with spike deletion H69-V70, France, August to December 2020. Euro Surveill 26(3):pii=2100008. https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.3.2100008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Perchetti GA, Zhu H, Mills MG, Shrestha L, Wagner C, Bakhash SM, Lin M, Xie H, Huang M-L, Mathias P, Bedford T, Jerome KR, Greninger AL, Roychoudhury P. 2021. Specific allelic discrimination of N501Y and other SARS-CoV-2 mutations by ddPCR detects B.1.1.7 lineage in Washington State. medRxiv 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Vavrek D, Speroni L, Curnow KJ, Oberholzer M, Moeder V, Febbo PG. 2021. Genomic surveillance at scale is required to detect newly emerging strains at an early timepoint. medRxiv 10.1101/2021.01.12.21249613. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021. COVID Data Tracker: published SARS-CoV-2 sequences. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#published-sars-cov-2-sequences. Accessed 31 May 2021.
  • 28.Elbe S, Buckland-Merrett G. 2017. Data, disease and diplomacy: GISAID’s innovative contribution to global health. Glob Chall 1:33–46. 10.1002/gch2.1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.The Lancet. 2021. Genomic sequencing in pandemics. Lancet 397:445. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00257-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Babiker A, Marvil CE, Waggoner JJ, Collins MH, Piantadosi A. 2021. The importance and challenges of identifying SARS-CoV-2 reinfections. J Clin Microbiol 59:e02769-20. 10.1128/JCM.02769-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1

Fig. S1 and S2. Download jcm.01446-21-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.4 MB (431.5KB, pdf)


Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES