Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0260086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260086

Effects of salt stress on the photosynthetic physiology and mineral ion absorption and distribution in white willow (Salix alba L.)

Xin Ran 1, Xiao Wang 1, Xiaokuan Gao 2, Haiyong Liang 1, Bingxiang Liu 1,3,*, Xiaoxi Huang 1
Editor: Mayank Gururani4
PMCID: PMC8601552  PMID: 34793527

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to explore the adaptive mechanism underlying the photosynthetic characteristics and the ion absorption and distribution of white willow (Salix alba L.) in a salt stress environment in cutting seedlings. The results lay a foundation for further understanding the distribution of sodium chloride and its effect on the photosynthetic system.

Method

A salt stress environment was simulated in a hydroponics system with different NaCl concentrations in one-year-old Salix alba L.branches as the test materials. Their growth, ion absorption, transport and distribution in the roots and leaves, and the changes in the photosynthetic fluorescence parameters were studied after 20 days under hydroponics.

Results

The results show that The germination and elongation of roots are promoted in the presence of 171mM NaCl, but root growth is comprehensively inhibited under increasing salt stress. Under salt stress, Na+ accumulates significantly in the roots and leaves, and the Na+ content and the Na+/K+ and Na+/Ca2+ root ratios are significantly greater than those in the leaves. When the NaCl concentration is ≤ 342mM, Salix alba can maintain relatively stable K+ and Ca2+ contents in its leaves by improving the selective absorption and accumulation of K+ and Ca2+ and adjusting the transport capacity of mineral ions to aboveground parts, while K+ and Ca2+ levels are clearly decreased under high salt stress. With increasing salt concentrations, the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (E) and stomatal conductance (gs) of leaves decrease gradually overall, and the intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) first decreases and then increases. When the NaCl concentration is < 342mM, the decrease in leaf Pn is primarily restricted by the stomata. When the NaCl concentration is > 342mM, the decrease in the Pn is largely inhibited by non-stomatal factors. Due to the salt stress environment, the OJIP curve (Rapid chlorophyll fluorescence) of Salix alba turns into an OKJIP curve. When the NaCl concentration is > 171mM, the fluorescence values of points I and P decrease significantly, which is accompanied by a clear inflection point (K). The quantum yield and energy distribution ratio of the PSⅡ reaction center change significantly (φPo, Ψo and φEo show an overall downward trend while φDo is promoted). The performance index and driving force (PIABS, PICSm and DFCSm) decrease significantly when the NaCl concentration is > 171mM, indicating that salt stress causes a partial inactivation of the PSII reaction center, and the functions of the donor side and the recipient side are damaged.

Conclusion

The above results indicate that Salix alba can respond to salt stress by intercepting Na+ in the roots, improving the selective absorption of K+ and Ca2+ and the transport capacity to the above ground parts of the plant, and increasing φDo, thus shows an ability to self-regulate and adapt.

1 Introduction

As one of abiotic stresses, salt stress can significantly affect plant growth and yield. Today, 1.125 billion hectares of farmland around the world are threatened by salt stress, which is an important issue for agriculture [1]. China also has 367 billion hectares affected by salt stress, accounting for 1,230 hectares of farmland soil [2]. Among the areas of concern, the coastal area, one of the primary types of saline-alkali land, has frequent water-salt interactions and secondary salinization as it is close to the sea [3]. Because the ecological environment of the salinization area is fragile and natural conditions are limited by many factors, it is highly significant to develop and use saline-alkali land scientifically and rationally while under pressure from a rapid population increase and a sharp decline in land resources; the goal is to advance towards the sustainable and healthy development of China’s forestry and ecological environment [4].

Choosing and cultivating excellent salt-tolerant tree species through biotechnology is currently one of the most economical, effective, ecological and environment-friendly biological measures to solve the soil salinization problem [5]. Salix babylonica is a deciduous tree or shrub belonging to Salix in the family Salicaceae. It has strong ecological adaptability and can grow well under saline-alkali, drought and barren soil conditions [6]. Previous studies on the salt tolerance of Salix plants were mostly focused on the physiological responses of seedlings to salt stress [79], but there are few studies on the adaptability of plants to salt stress specific to seedlings. High salt stress will cause plant water loss, ion imbalance and nutrient element deficiency through osmotic stress and ion poisoning [10], which will affect the normal growth and morphology of plants. A series of physiological growth changes in plants under salt stress are the comprehensive embodiment of their salt tolerance ability, among which the growth status of plant roots, the ion accumulation in different organs and the change in photosynthetic fluorescence parameters are important factors affecting the salt tolerance ability of plants [1113]. These indicators not only can represent the extent of the effects of stress factors on plants, but they can also reflect the growth of plants under salt stress, the selective absorption and transport of ions, and the photosynthesis ability. Willow has the characteristics of antipyretic, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, anti-rheumatism, astringent, drought resistance [14] and anti-corrosion [15], among which the bark of White Willow contains salicin [16, 17] with antibacterial, bactericidal, antioxidant, antipyretic, analgesic and other functions, and is a good natural food additive and food resource of health care products [18]. Its roots can also absorb harmful elements, reduce the impact of harmful elements on the surrounding soil [19, 20], and play a role in purifying polluted water [21]. Salix alba has strong adaptability [22], so it has great potential for use and promotion in the ecological management of coastal saline-alkali soil. Therefore, this experiment involved Salix alba branches as the object and used hydroponics to simulate the seedling raising process of cuttings on coastal saline-alkali land to study the growth of their roots, the changing ion contents in the roots and leaves, and the changing photosynthetic fluorescence parameters under different salt concentrations. Exploring the salt tolerance of Salix alba can not only provide theoretical reference for the study of its salt stress adaptation mechanism, but also provide suggestions for the utilization of salix salix salix in coastal saline-alkali areas.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Test materials and test design

The test materials were collected from the germplasm resource nursery of Golden Beach Forest Farm in Huai’an County, Hebei Province. The branches of the Salix alba were basically the same in terms of growth, and those that were robust and free of diseases and insect pests were selected after the leaves fell in December. The middle two-thirds of the selected branches were cut into 20 cm-long cuttings. The uppermost bud was 0.5–1 cm from the top of the cuttings. The upper cut was a flat cut, and the lower cut was an oblique cut. The experiment was performed in the Artificial Climate Room of Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding City, Hebei Province on December 23, 2019. The temperature of the climate room was set to 28°C/25°C (light/dark); the LED cold light source maintained the light intensity at 1000 μmol·m-2·s-1; the photoperiod was 14 h/10 h (light/dark); and the humidity was 60%.

The test material was placed in a 55 cm×38 cm×15 cm (length ×width ×height) plastic box for hydroponic culture (Fig 1). The experiment consisted of 5 treatments, and each treatment was repeated 3 times. We set the concentration of Nacl and the composition of culture medium by referring to existing studies [2325]. A 1/2 dilution of Hoagland’s complete nutrient solution was used as the base to prepare hydroponic solutions with NaCl concentrations of 171mmol、342mmol、513mmol、684mmol, and 1/2 Hoagland’s complete nutrient solution (PH = 7.2) was used as a control (CK). 1/2 Hoagland’s complete nutrient solution includes: Ca(NO3)2·4H2O 472.5mg、K2SO4 303.5mg、NH4H2PO4 57.5mg、MgSO4 246.5mg、NaFeC10H12N2O8·3H2O 30mg、FeSO4 15mg、H3BO3 2.86mg、Na2B4O7·10H2O 4.5mg、MnSO4 2.13mg, CuSO4 0.05mg、ZnSO4 0.22mg、H8MoN2O4 0.02mg. There were 25 cuttings in each treatment, and they were soaked directly in the solution; the height of the solution was approximately more than half of the height of the cuttings. The nutrient solution was changed every 5 days during the growth process. Before the nutrient solution was changed, the cuttings were removed and the roots were rinsed with water to wash away the last residual salt and prevent excessive salt accumulation. The contents of Na+, K+ and Ca2+ ions and the photosynthetic parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence kinetic curve parameters in the roots and leaves were determined following 20 days of treatment.

Fig 1. Experimental scenes of the effects of salt stress on Salix alba L.

Fig 1

2.2 Measured items and methods

2.2.1 Measurement of root growth parameters

During the growth of Salix alba, the number of root sprouting days and the rooting rate of all the cuttings were counted, and the rooting index was calculated according to the number of root sprouting days (rooting index = ∑Gt/Dt, where Dt, the day of the rooting test; Gt, the number of rooting branches on the day, and the rooting index is the number of rooting branches on the day/sum of days). After 20 days of salt stress treatment, 5 uniformly growing cuttings were selected to measure the average root number and average root length.

2.2.2 Determination of ion contents in the roots and leaves, calculation of the ion selective absorption and transport ratio

The measurement method for tracking the ion content was slightly modified relative to the method by Yang Sheng et al. [26] and Yu Bingjun et al. [27]. The sample was first baked at 105°C for 30 min and then dried at 70–80°C to a constant weight. After the sample was ground and passed through a sieve (the aperture was 0.425 mm), the fixed mass was weighed. Thirty mL of deionized water was added to the sample, which was then shaken well and placed in a boiling water bath for 2 h. After cooling, the sample was filtered and diluted to 50 mL. The Na+, K+ and Ca2+ contents were determined by atomic absorption method (Atomic absorption spectrometer: ZEEnit700-700P; analytikjena computer in Germany). The methods of Zheng Qingsong et al. [28] and Yang Xiaoying et al. [29] were used to calculate the selective absorption and transport coefficients of ions X (K+ and Ca2+) by the roots and leaves according to the following formula. Ion absorption coefficient SA x, Na = root ([X]/[Na+])/medium ([X]/[Na+]); ion transport coefficient ST x, Na = leaf ([X]/[Na+])/Root ([X]/[Na+]). In the formula, the K+ content in the medium (culture broth) was 272 mg, and the Ca2+ content was 230 mg.

2.2.3 Determination of photosynthetic parameters in the leaves

Following 20 days of salt stress treatment, the photosynthetic gas exchange parameters of the Salix alba leaves were measured. Five uniformly growing cuttings were selected for each treatment group in the test. After the cuttings were left under normal illumination in the climate room for 3 hours, we selected the 3rd to 5th leaves from the top to bottom with the same position, size, and light-receiving direction and with fully expanded functional leaves. Using a Li-6800 portable photosynthesis meter (LI-COR, USA), the Pn, E, gs and Ci can be determined. The measurement conditions were as follows: the PAR was 1000 μmol·m-2 ·s-1, the CO2 concentration in the fixed system was 400 μmol·mol-1, and the relative humidity was 60%.

2.2.4 Rapid determination of the chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetic curve

After 20 days of salt stress treatment, 5 Salix alba cuttings with average growth were selected from each treatment for measurement. Before the measurement, the leaves were dark-adapted for 15 minutes, and then the rapid chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetic curve and related parameters were measured using a Pocket PEA plant efficiency analyzer (Pocket PEA, Hansatech, UK). The resulting O-K-J-I-P curve was used for rapid chlorophyll fluorescence induction curve data analysis (JIP-test) and calculation [30, 31].

2.3 Data processing

One-way ANOVA and the LSD method were used to test the significance of the differences (α = 0. 05).

3 Results

3.1 Effects of salt stress on Salix albicans root growth

The test results show that although plants under salt stress can reach a 100% rooting rate between treatments, the average root number, average root length and rooting index are quite different among the treatments, and the overall trend is basically the same. The trend is that low-salt stress stimulates root germination and elongation, high-salt stress inhibits root growth, and the intensity of the inhibition is positively correlated with the salt concentration.

Figs 2 and 3 show that when the NaCl concentration was 171mM, the average root number and average root length were significantly increased compared with those of the control. This result may be a stimulating effect of low-salt stress on root growth and then appear again as the stress intensifies, with a gradual downward trend. When the NaCl concentration was 513mM, the root number and length were significantly lower than those of their respective controls by 48.7% and 39.9%, and the root growth was significantly inhibited at that time. Compared with the control, the rooting index did not change significantly when the NaCl concentration was 171mM, but with the increase in stress, the number of days for root germination was delayed, and the rooting index decreased significantly. When the NaCl concentrations were 342mM, 513mM and 684mM, the rooting indexes were significantly lower than that of the control (9.6%, 18.1% and 27.7%).

Fig 2. Changes of root growth of Salix alba L. under salt stress.

Fig 2

Fig 3. Effects of salt stress on root growth of Salix alba L. cuttings.

Fig 3

3.2 Effects of salt stress on ion content, absorption and transport in the roots and leaves of Salix alba

The ion content measurements (Fig 4) showed that under different concentrations of NaCl, the Na+ contents in the roots and leaves of Salix alba were significantly higher than that in the control group, and the range of Na+ change was positively correlated with the stress concentration. The comparison of Na+ contents in the roots and leaves shows that the Na+ content of the roots is much higher than that in the leaves. Under 684mM NaCl stress, the Na+ content in the roots could reach twice that in the leaves. With increasing stress concentration, the K+ content in the leaves first increased and then decreased, reaching a peak at a concentration of 171mM NaCl, which was a significant increase of 14.0% compared to the control group. However, after the NaCl concentration was greater than 342mM, the concentration was significantly lower than that of the control. As the stress concentration increased, the K+ contents in the roots of each treatment group showed a gradual decrease, which were all significantly lower than that of the control. The Ca2+ content in the leaves of Salix alba increased first and then decreased with increasing salt concentration. At 342mM NaCl, compared with the control group, the concentration significantly increased by 13.6% and then showed a significant downward trend. The Ca2+ content in the roots decreased continuously with increasing stress, and when the NaCl concentration was 684mM, the Ca2+ content dropped to 35.6% of the control.

Fig 4. Effects of salt stress on ion content in roots and leaves of Salix alba L.

Fig 4

Figs 5 and 6 show that both the Na+/K+ and Na+/Ca2+ in the roots and leaves increased significantly with increasing NaCl stress concentration. This finding shows that as the stress intensifies, the relative absorption of Na+ by Salix alba increases greatly, but the absorption of K+ and Ca2+ decreases. The Na+/K+ and Na+/Ca2+ contents of all the treatments gradually decreased from root to leaf, and the rising Na+/K+ and Na+/Ca2+ in the roots were significantly (F = 1263.766, df = 4, Sig.<0.001; F = 10485.256, df = 4, Sig.<0.001) higher than those in leaves (F = 1235.223, df = 4, Sig.<0.001; F = 2335.783, df = 4, Sig.<0.001), suggesting that Salix alba could reduce the salt stress damage to young tissues by regulating ion transport.

Fig 5. Effects of salt stress on Na+/ Ca2+ in roots and leaves of Salix alba L.

Fig 5

Fig 6. Effects of salt stress on Na+/ K+ in roots and leaves of Salix alba L.

Fig 6

As shown in Fig 7, with increasing NaCl stress, the SA k, Na, ST k, Na, SA Ca, Na, and ST Ca, Na all showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. When the NaCl concentration was less than or equal to 342mM, the selective absorption capacity of the roots for K+ and Ca2+ and the selective transport capacity of the leaves for K+ () and Ca2+ were enhanced and reached a significant level (F = 998.922, df = 4, Sig.<0.001;F = 1018.689, df = 4, Sig.<0.001; F = 168.047, df = 4, Sig.<0.001; F = 29.925, df = 4, Sig.<0.001). The selective absorption capacity of roots for K+ is greater than that of Ca2+, but the selective transport capacity of the leaves to Ca2+ is greater than that of K+. These results indicated that Salix alba could adjust the upward transport capacity of K+ and Ca2+ via the selective absorption and accumulation of mineral ions to compensate for the change in concentration under salt stress, to prevent the impacts of nutrient deficiency and ion toxicity on the shoot growth.

Fig 7. Effects of salt stress on selective uptake and transportation of ion in roots and leaves of Salix alba L.

Fig 7

3.3 Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic parameters in Salix alba Leaves

Figs 8 and 9 show that the photosynthetic parameters of Salix alba leaves were affected to different degrees under different salt concentrations. When the NaCl concentration was 171mM, the Pn of the leaves increased, but there was no significant difference from the control. Later, as the salt stress intensified, the photosynthetic carbon assimilation ability of Salix alba leaves was significantly inhibited (F = 95.66, df = 4, Sig.<0.001); when the NaCl concentration was greater than 171mM, both the E (F = 100.091, df = 4, Sig.<0.001)and gs (F = 69.346, df = 4, Sig.<0.001) were significantly lower than the control and became stronger; but at a low salt concentration (171mM NaCl), there is no significant difference from the control. With the increased salt concentration, the leaf Ci showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing, reaching the lowest when the salt concentration was 342mM, which was significantly lower than the control by 10.4%, and then it gradually increased. The Ci of leaves (F = 20.50, df = 4, Sig.<0.001) under 513mM and 684mM NaCl treatments were not significantly different from that of the control, but they were significantly higher than the lowest value by 12.4% and 14.6%, respectively.

Fig 8. Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic parameter (Pn and E)in leaves of Salix alba L.

Fig 8

Fig 9. Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic parameter (Ci and gs) in leaves of Salix alba L.

Fig 9

3.4 Effect of salt stress on the rapid chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetic curve (OJIP) of Salix alba leaves

The OJIP curve can provide a great deal of photochemical information about PSⅡ and accurately reflect the state of the plant photosynthetic apparatus and the electron redox state of the PSⅡ donor side, acceptor side and PSⅡ reaction center in the photoreaction [32], thus representing the effects of external stress on the plant photosynthesis ability and even the degree of damage to the photosynthetic organs. Fig 10 shows that with the increasing NaCl concentration, the OJIP curve of Salix alba leaves changes to different degrees. Compared with the control group, under the 171mM NaCl treatment, the fluorescence value of JIP does not change significantly; when the NaCl concentration reaches 342mM and higher, the fluorescence values of I and P drop significantly and there is an obvious inflection point K (approximately 300 μs), and the OJIP curve changes to the O-K-J-I-P curve. The K-phase fluorescence value under high salt treatment is higher than that under low salt treatment, and the maximum fluorescence can be reached faster, which indicates that the higher the salt treatment concentration is, the greater the damage to the leaves of Salix alba.

Fig 10. Effect of salt stress on the fast induction curves of chlorophyll a fluorescence (O-J-I-P curve) of Salix alba L. leave.

Fig 10

3.5 Effects of salt stress on quantum yield and energy distribution ratio

Fig 11 shows that under different salt stresses, the energy absorbed, transformed, used for electron transfer, and dissipated by thermal radiation in the leaves of Salix alba changes. Compared with the control group, with the increasing NaCl concentration, the maximum photochemical efficiency (φPo) of Salix alba leaves after dark adaptation gradually decreased. Under the 342mM NaCl treatment, the φPo was significantly lower than that of the control. At that time, salt stress triggered photoinhibition, and the photosynthetic capacity of the leaves was reduced.

Fig 11. Changes of chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters under salt stress of Salix alba L.

Fig 11

The excitons captured by the reaction center transfer electrons to the electron transport chain, and the ratio of excitons that exceed QA’s other electron acceptors to promote QA reduction excitons (Ψo) and the light energy absorbed by the reaction center are used for electron transfer. The quantum yields (φEo) all increased first and then decreased with the increasing salt stress. At 171mM NaCl, although the Ψo and φEo increased, they were not significantly different from the control. Later, as the stress intensified, both the Ψo and φEo were significantly lower than those of the control. When the NaCl concentration was 342mM, the Ψo and φEo were significantly lower than the 11.1% and 11.9% of the control group, respectively. Compared with the control group, salt stress increased the quantum ratio (φDo) of Salix alba leaves for heat dissipation. When the NaCl concentration was 513mM, φDo was significantly higher than that of the control.

3.6 Influence of salt stress on the performance index and driving force

The performance index and driving force can accurately reflect the changes in the state of the photosynthetic apparatus of plants under stress. PIABS refers to the performance index based on the absorption of light energy, PICSm refers to the performance index based on the unit area, and DFCSm refers to the driving force based on the unit area of the material. Figs 12 and 13 show that as the NaCl stress concentration increases, PIABS, PICSm and DFCSm all show a gradual decline. PIABS showed no significant difference from the control when the NaCl concentration was 171mM, and then with the increased salt concentrations, the difference became more significant (F = 61.074, df = 4, Sig.<0.001), indicating that the Salix alba leaves experienced photoinhibition, the PSⅡ was damaged, and the measurement at the 684mM NaCl concentration was significantly lower than that of the control, by 60.2%. When the NaCl concentrations were 342mM, 513mM and 684mM, the PICSm values were significantly lower (F = 202.821, df = 4, Sig.<0.001) than that of the control by 20.1%, 43.9% and 66.4%; when the NaCl concentrations were 513mM and 684mM, the DFCSm values were significantly lower (F = 40.755, df = 4, Sig.<0.001) than the control by 6.3% and 11.2%. Salt stress seriously affects the absorption of light energy by plants and leads to a decline in the basic driving force.

Fig 12. The changes of performance index and driving force (PIABS and DFCSm) under different salt stress.

Fig 12

Fig 13. The changes of performance index and driving force (PICSm) under different salt stress.

Fig 13

4 Conclusions and discussion

4.1 Influence of salt stress on the root growth status of Salix alba

As the primary organ responsible for plant material exchange, the root system and its growth status are closely related to the growth and development of the aboveground plant parts, whether the root system can function normally, and the plant’s water and nutrient utilization efficiency [33]. Under salt stress, the root system is the first to feel the adversity stress signal, and it is also the most directly affected part [34]. Its ring-stripe inhibition is primarily manifested in the low levels of the root length, surface area and other parameters, and the root system grows slowly. A high-salt environment will cause plants to experience osmotic stress and ion toxicity, which will lead to changes in membrane permeability, which will in turn affect the absorption of water and nutrient elements by the roots, causing the plants to lose a large amount of water; the ions near the roots will be unbalanced, the physiological functions of the roots will eventually be lowered, and even the structure will be destroyed. Some of the aboveground leaves wilt, and photosynthetic production cannot be performed normally, which causes plant growth and metabolic disorders until the loss of physiological functions.

The change in root growth and the time of the root sprouting period can directly reflect the degree of damage to plants by salt stress and represent the strength of plant salt tolerance [35]. This study showed that the 171mM NaCl concentration significantly promoted the increase in the average number of roots and the elongation of the average root length of Salix alba cuttings, and it can promote the rooting of the root system in advance, to a certain extent, which is consistent with Wang Shufeng et al. [36] and Ci Dun. The research results of Wei et al. [35] were basically the same. This growth response may be due to the decrease in water potential outside the roots under salt stress, which stimulates the growth of the roots instead of moderate osmotic stress to ensure the normal absorption of water and nutrients to meet the physiological and metabolic needs of the aboveground parts.

Some plants do have the phenomenon that low salt promotes the increase of some indicators, such as: promoting the germination of sorghum seeds [37], the roots of the seedlings of wolfberry [38] and rice [39], and the growth indicators of corn [40, 41]. Both ChorophyⅡin chrysanthemum [42] and proline content of cherry seedlings [43] are increased, while the net photosynthetic rate of wild chrysanthemum [44] and hazel trees increased [45]. The reason for the low salt concentration may be that the salt stress has a dual effect of stimulus and inhibition on plants. The strong and weak relationship between stimulus and inhibition triggers changes in various plant indicators, resulting in the same low salt. It can promote growth, and it will be inhibited after high salt. This finding shows that Salix alba has some ability to adjust and adapt to salt stress, and this adaptability is of great significance to the survival and continuation of the plant itself under adversity. However, as the salt stress intensifies, the ability of plants to coordinate their own growth is destroyed, root germination and elongation are significantly inhibited and become more intense, the root functions are destroyed, and the plants cannot maintain their normal growth and development.

4.2 Effects of salt stress on ion content, absorption and transport in Salix alba

Ions play an important role in the normal growth of plants, but salt stress can destroy the dynamic balance of ions in plants [46], hinder the absorption of nutrients, and cause plant metabolism disorders. The change in the distribution of ions reflects the degree of damage to plant cells by the external adverse environment. Additionally, plants can maintain balanced nutrition by improving the absorption and transport of ions, which also represents the level of plant resistance to stress. When measuring the ion contents of plant roots and leaves, it is helpful to reveal the salt tolerance or salt damage mechanism of plants.

In this study, when the salt concentration was low, the growth of Salix alba was basically normal, the symptoms of salt damage were not significant, and the damage was obvious under severe stress. Na+ accumulates significantly in the roots and leaves of Salix alba under salt stress, but the Na+ content in different organs is significantly different, and it is primarily concentrated in the roots. This result shows that the willow root system has a compensation mechanism that can reduce the transportation of salt to aboveground parts by enriching Na+ in the root, thereby effectively reducing or delaying the occurrence of salt damage in the aboveground parts. This conclusion is consistent with the study by Hao Han et al. [47]. When the salt stress is too high, this balance is broken, and growth is blocked.

As an important inorganic solute, K+ is essential for reducing the cell osmotic potential and maintaining the water balance. Generally, plants have an antagonistic effect on the absorption of Na+ and K+ [48], and the competition between the two usually leads to a decrease in the K+ content. The loss of K+ will cause changes in the physical structure of the stomata, frustrating photosynthesis [49]. In addition, K+ participates in the metabolism of various enzymes in plants [50]. As salt stress increases, an excessive loss of K+ will lead to K+ dependent enzymes in Salix alba The enzyme activity decreases, which affects the metabolic reactions in which it participates. Therefore, if plants are to grow in a salty environment, the selective absorption of K+ by the root system and the transportation of K+ to the ground are particularly important. This study showed that the K+ content in the roots of Salix alba significantly decreased with increasing stress, but the K+ in the leaves could be maintained at a high level at a 342mM NaCl concentration and below and even increased significantly when the NaCl concentration was 171mM, according to Zhou Qi et al. [51] A study on Carpinus chinensis also confirmed this result. At this time, the value and increase of Na+/K+ in the roots of the Salix alba were greater than that of the leaves, and the SA k, Na and ST k, Na all increased significantly. Studies have shown that under salt stress, the Na+/K+ value can represent the degree of salt damage to the plant, and the lower Na+/K+ value of the leaves can help the plant better maintain its growth and photosynthetic function [52], and the SA k, Na and ST k, Na indicates that the plants can better tolerate salt stress [53]. This result shows that at that time, Salix alba could maintain a relatively stable leaf K+ content and the normal progress of photosynthesis by restricting the transportation of Na+ from the root to the leaves, increasing the selective absorption of K+ through the plant roots and the ability to transport K+ to the ground. The accumulation of Na+ causes damage to plants, which may be an important mechanism by which Salix alba copes with salt stress. Later, with the increase in salt stress, the K+ in the roots and leaves clearly flowed out. A high concentration of Na+ will replace the Ca2+ bound to the membrane system, which will damage the integrity of the membrane structure and membrane function, thereby destroying the ion balance in the plant body and causing a large amount of organic solute extravasation [54]. The establishment of Ca2+ homeostasis in the cytoplasm is a key condition for salt adaptation [55]. This experiment showed that as the salt stress intensified, the Ca2+ content in the Salix alba roots continued to decrease, but it could accumulate in the leaves when the NaCl concentration was ≤342mM. The results of Jia Yin et al. [56] were similar; the Na+/Ca2+ value of white Salix roots was higher than that of the leaves, and the Sa Ca, Na and ST ca, Na were all significantly increased. This result may be due to the large influx of Na+ into the root system under salt stress, activating Ca2+ signal transduction, triggering the sodium elimination system to reduce the damage of Na+, and enhancing the selective absorption of Ca2+ in leaves, thereby enhancing the selective transport of Ca2+ from root to shoot to maintain the low cell osmotic potential and the stability of the cell membrane. In addition, studies have shown that the increase in intracellular Ca2+ contents under salt stress can inhibit the outflow of K+, thereby alleviating the damage of salt stress to plants [57]. Therefore, the upward transportation of Ca2+ in the roots of Salix alba may be an important mechanism for it to maintain the balance of K+ and Na+ in the aerial part, establish ion homeostasis in the aerial part, and adapt to salt stress. However, due to the limited ability of the roots of Salix alba to absorb Ca2+, under high salt stress, the absorption of the roots will not be able to offset the loss of nutrient elements caused by ion poisoning.

4.3 Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic parameters of Salix alba

Photosynthesis is a key metabolic process that provides material energy for plants. High salt stress will comprehensively affect the photosynthesis of plants through osmotic stress, ion toxicity, and feedback inhibition caused by the accumulation of photosynthetic products [58]. These effects will cause the destruction of the membrane structure and the imbalance of ions in tissue cells, affecting the absorption of light energy by plants and the process of carbon assimilation [59]. This change inhibits the formation of leaf primordia and reduces the photosynthetic area and carbon assimilation of individual plants, resulting in physiological metabolic disorders and the accumulation of toxic substances. In fact, the energy supply related to photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and the TCA cycle are all inhibited by salt stress [60].

Because stomata are directly connected to the external environment, their coordinated response under stress determines whether the photosynthetic capacity of the plant is normal [61]. In this experiment, the Pn, E, and gs did not change significantly when the NaCl concentration was 171mM. As the salt concentration further increased, each index decreased significantly, which is basically consistent with the results of previous studies [62, 63]. When the NaCl concentration was less than 342mM, the Ci of the Salix alba leaves decreased with decreasing gs. Thus, the diffusion resistance of CO2 in the leaves increases, and the carbon sequestration ability weakens. The stoma factor is the dominant factor restricting the decline in Salix alba leaf photosynthesis. Later, as the degree of salt stress further intensified, the Ci increased with the decreasing gs, and the photosynthetic system activity of the mesophyll cells decreased, resulting in a decrease in the assimilation capacity, which is a typical non-stomatal limiting factor. Previous studies have shown that under adverse stress, stomatal restriction and non-stomatal restriction and the interaction of the two will reduce the photosynthetic rate of plants; under mild stress, stomatal restriction is dominant; and under severe stress, stomatal restriction leads to non-stomatal restriction [64, 65]. Our experiment also supports this view.

4.4 Effects of salt stress on chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics of Salix alba

The OJIP curve contains a great deal of information about the original photochemical reaction of the PSII reaction center [66]. When environmental conditions change, chlorophyll fluorescence can directly or indirectly affect the photosystem performance of plants [67]. The changes in the PSII can reflect the impact of changes in the stress environment on the photosynthetic capacity of plants and the adaptation mechanism of photosynthetic machinery to environmental changes. High salt stress can inhibit or destroy parts of the functions of PSⅡ, hinder the original photochemical reaction and electron transfer process of PSⅡ, and reduce the photosynthetic capacity of Salix alba leaves. This consequence may be the result of the accumulation of Na+. The typical fast fluorescence kinetics curve generally has O, J, I, and P phases during the rising phase of fluorescence [68]. This study shows that when the concentration of NaCl is ≥ 342mM, the OJIP curve of Salix alba will be deformed to OKJIP, the fluorescence values of points I and P will decrease significantly, and obvious inflection point K will appear. The occurrence of the K point is caused by damage to the PSII donor side oxygen release complex (OEC) due to the inhibition of the water lysis system and the receptor-side part before QA, and the relatively variable fluorescence of the K point can represent the degree of OEC damage [69, 70]. In addition, the high salt treatment greatly shortened the time required to reach the P point (the maximum fluorescence value). This result indicates that the higher the degree of salt stress, the greater the damage to the stability of the PSⅡ reaction center and the OEC on the PSⅡ donor side of Salix alba leaves, the weaker the ability to provide electrons downstream and the stronger the reduction of the PSⅡ acceptor side is hindered.

The φPo, Ψo, φEo, φDo reflect the energy distribution ratio of plants. In this study, when the NaCl concentration was 171mM, there was no significant difference among the indicators. As the stress intensified, the φPo, Ψo and φEo decreased significantly while the φDo increased significantly, which is different from the results of Huang Qinqin et al. [71]. This finding shows that Salix alba adjusted the energy distribution ratio of the PSII reaction center under different degrees of stress. This adjustment occurs to increase the quantum ratio used for heat dissipation and reduce the proportion of energy in photochemical reactions, which is an adaptive regulation mechanism of Salix alba under salt stress. The decrease in the φPo, Ψo and φEo indicates that the photosynthetic machinery is clearly damaged, the ability to reduce the QB and PQ on the PSII receptor side is diminished, and the electron transfer process is inhibited. Plants are prone to occur or aggravate photoinhibition in adverse environments [69]. In this study, when the concentration of NaCl was greater than 171mM, the PIABS, PICSm and DFCSm all showed a significant downward trend. This trend shows that Salix alba leaves exhibit photoinhibition, the PSII reaction center is reversibly inactivated or irreversibly degraded, the conversion efficiency of light energy is reduced, and the function of the photosynthetic apparatus is impaired, which restricts the normal progress of photosynthesis.

In this study, 171mM NaCl stress had no significant effect on the growth status of the Salix alba root system, ion distribution or photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics and even increased these parameters to a certain extent. As the salt treatment concentration gradually increased, the average root number and length, and rooting index decreased significantly; Na+ accumulated in the root system, K+ and Ca2+ were significantly lost; the photosynthetic rate decreased significantly, the PSⅡ reaction center was partially inactivated, and the donor side OEC and the electron acceptor on the acceptor side were damaged. Salix alba can respond to salt stress by intercepting Na+ in the root system, improving the selective absorption of K+ and Ca2+ and the ground transportation capacity, and increasing the quantum ratio used for heat dissipation, indicating that Salix willow has some tolerance to salt stress environments.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. Effects of salt stress on the contents of three ions in roots and leaves of Salix alba L.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We express sincere gratitude to all the authors involved in this study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its S1 Appendix files.

Funding Statement

This study was jointly supported by grants from the Natural Science foundation of Hebei Province(17226320D-4). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Sunjeet Kumar, Li G J, Yang J J, et al. (2021) Effect of Salt Stress on Growth, Physiological Parameters, and Ionic Concentration of Water Dropwort (Oenanthe javanica) Cultivars. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sunjeet Kumar, Li G J, Yang J J, et al. (2020) Investigation of an Antioxidative System for Salinity Tolerance in Oenanthe javanica. Antioxidants 9(10): 1–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.ZHU J F, CUI Z R, WU C H, et al. (2018) Research Advances and Prospect of Saline and Alkali Land Greening in China. World Forestry Research 31(04): 70–75. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.YANG Q S, LIU D, GAO W D, et al. (2016) Research Progress on Stress Resistance of Willow. Forestry Science and Technology Newsletter (07): 24–27. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.WANG Q Z, LIU Q, GAO Y N, et al. (2017) Review on the mechanisms of the response to salinity-alkalinity stress in plants. Acta Ecologica Sinica 37(16): 5565–5577. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.LI Z Y (2017) Physiological responses of Salix psammophila seedlings to complex saline-alkali stress. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry sciences. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.LIU Y M, CHENG C, JIANG L, et al. (2019) Comparisons on growth, salt ion distribution, and relative expression of SOS1 gene in three species of Tamarix Linn. under NaCl stress. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment 28(01): 1–9. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.ZHANG X, HE K N, SHI C Q, et al. (2017) Effects of salt stress on growth and physiological characteristics of Tamarix chinensis and Nitraria tangutorum seedlings. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition) 45(01): 105–111. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.LI Z Y, CONG R C, YANG Q S, et al. (2017) Effects of saline-alkali stress on growth and osmotic adjustment substances in willow seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica 37(24): 8511–8517. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.ZHANG J L, LI H R, GUO S Y, et al. (2015) Research advances in higher plant adaptation to salt stress. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 24(12): 220–236. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.YANG S, LIU Z X, ZHANG H X, et al. (2013) Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance and screening identification indexes for three tree species. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 49(1): 91–98. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.RAUT R, SHARMA S, BAJRACHARYA R M. (2012) Biotic response to acidification of lakes: a review. Kathmandu University Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology 8(1): 171–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.KALAJI H M, JAJOO A, OUKARROUM A, et al. (2016) Chlorophyll a fluorescence as a tool to monitor physiological status of plants under abiotic stress conditions. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 38(4): 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kolozsvári Ildikó,Kun Ágnes, Jancsó Mihály, et al. (2021) Utilization of Fish Farm Effluent for Irrigation Short Rotation Willow (Salix alba L.) under Lysimeter Conditions. Forests 12(4). [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Barnes J, Anderson LA and Phillipson JD. (2007) Herbal Medicines.London. Chicago: Pharmaceutical Press: 598–600. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.HUI Y H, WANG R C.(2004) Determination of salicin in the extract of Salix officinalis by RP-HPLC. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Medicines (05):48–49.[in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.KONG J H, WANG Y F, YANG X F, et al. (2012) Extraction of salicin from populus euphratica leaves by alcohol-alkali method. Food science and technology 37(11):205–209.[in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.DUAN H, ZHAI K F, GAO G Z, et al. (2012) Purification of salicin from the roots of maple leaf by macroporous adsorption resin. Food science 33(22):99–102.[in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mataruga Z, Jarić S, Marković M, et al. (2020) Evaluation of Salix alba, Juglans regia and Populus nigra as biomonitors of PTEs in the riparian soils of the Sava River. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 192(2):131. doi: 10.1007/s10661-020-8085-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Demush Bajraktari, Petrovska Biljana Bauer Zeneli Lulzim, et al. (2020) Soil chemical evaluation and power plant ash impact on chemical properties of Salix alba L. (Fam. Salicaceae): The impact of bioaccumulation. Toxicology Research and Application 4(4). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Luca Regni, Bartucca Maria Luce Pannacci Euro, et al. (2021) Phytodepuration of Nitrate Contaminated Water Using Four Different Tree Species.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) 10(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Quiñones Martorello A. S., Fernández M. E., Monterubbianesi M.G., et al. (2020) Effect of combined stress (salinity + hypoxia) and auxin rooting hormone addition on morphology and growth traits in six Salix spp. clones. New Forests: International Journal on the Biology, Biotechnology, and Management of Afforestation and Reforestation 51(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 23.HU A S, ZHANG X D, GUO W J, et al(2021) Ion Absorption, transport and distribution of Malus petalis under salt Stress. Plant Physiology Journal 57(09):1829–1838. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.LI B B, OU YJ, WANG J Y, et al. (2017) Effects of NaCl on growth, development and some physiological characteristics of salix matsulosa. Journal of tianjin normal university (natural science edition) 37(06):37–42. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.CHEN T, White, James F, (2021) Exogenous spermidine enhances Epichloë endophyte-induced tolerance to NaCl stress in wild barley (Hordeum brevisubulatum). Plant and Soil(prepublish). [Google Scholar]
  • 26.YANG S (2010) Study on selection and evaluation criteria of salinity-tolerance tree species in coastal region. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry sciences. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.YU B J, LUO Q Y, CAO A Z, et al. (2001) Comparison of salt tolerance and ion effect in cultivated and wild soybean. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment 10(01): 25–29. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.ZHENG Q S, WANG R L, LIU Y L (2001) Effects of Ca2+ on Absorption and Distribution of Ions in Salt-treated Cotton Seedlings. Plant Physiology Journal 27(4): 325–330. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.YANG X Y, ZHANG W H, WANG Q Y, et al. (2003) Salt tolerance of wild soybeans in Jiangsu and its relation with ionic distribution and selective transportation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 14(12): 2237–2240. [in Chinese] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.STRASSER R J, SRIVASTAVA A, TSIMILLI-MICHAEL M (2000) The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. In: Yunus M, Pathre U, Mohanty P (eds). Probing Photosynthesis: Mechanism, Regulationand Adaptation. London: Taylor and Francis Press, 445–483. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.STRASSER B J, STRASSER R J (1995) Measuring fast fluorescence transients to address environmental questions: The JIP test. In: Mathis P ed. Photosynthesis: From Light to Biosphere. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: KAP Press; 5: 977~980. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.SUN J, JIA Y X, GUO S R, et al. (2010) Resistance of spinach plants to seawater stress is correlated with higher activity of xanthophyll cycle and better maintenance of the chlorophyll metabolism. Photosynthetica 48(4): 567–579. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.YANG Z Q, QIU Y X, LIU Z X, et al. (2016) Effects of soil water stress on root and overground growth of plant tomato. Acta Ecologica Sinica 36(3): 748–757. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.WANG S F, HU Y X, SUN H J, et al. (2014) Effects of salt stress on growth and root development of two oak seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica 34(4): 1021–1029. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.CI D W, ZHANG Z M, DING H, et al. (2015) Evaluation and selection indices of salinity tolerance in peanut seedling[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica 35(03): 805–814. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.WANG S F, HU Y X, LI Z L, et al. (2010) Effects of NaCl stress on growth and mineral ion uptake, transportation and distribution of Quercus virginiana. Acta Ecologica Sinica 30(17): 4609–4616. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.CHEN X F, ZHANG R D, XINNG Y F, et al. (2021) The efficacy of different seed priming agents for promoting sorghum germination under salt stress. PloS one 16(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.ZHU J J, MA H J, QIN H Y. et al. (2021) Effects of potassium solubilizing bacteria and salt stress on root characteristics and physiological metabolism of Lycium barbarum seedlings. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas 39(05):50–58+65.[in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.LIU S H, ZHU X S, YAN M, et al. (2020) Effects of NaCl immersion on root growth characteristics of hybrid rice seedlings under salt stress. Journal of southwest university (natural science edition) 42(08):59–65.[in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Iqbal M, Ashraf M, Jamil A, et al. (2006) Does seed priming induce changes in the levels of some endogenous plant hormones in hexaploid wheat plants under salt stress. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 48(2): 181–189. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tsegay BA, Yohannes G (2013) The role of seed priming in improving seedling growth of maize (Zea mays L.) under salt stress at field conditions. Agricultural Sciences 4(12): 666–672. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.LI Z L (2020) Evaluation of salt tolerance of four chrysanthemum and its related genera. Liaoning Forestry Science and Technology (02):36–38. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.SHU J, LIU S H, ZHANG A H, et al. (2021) Effects of NaCl stress on photosynthetic characteristics, chlorophyll fluorescence and osmotic regulatory substances in Cherry seedlings. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences 49(07):834–838.[in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.LIU X W, XIA B, CHEN B, et al. (2021) Effects of salt Stress on photosynthetic physiology of Chrysanthemum and Chrysanthemum shennong and their F_1 hybrids. Journal of Northeast Forestry University 49(05):32–39.[in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.LUO D, SHI Y J, SONG F H, et al. (2019) Effects of salt stress on growth, photosynthetic and fluorescence characteristics and root architecture of heterosis hazel seedlings. Chinese journal of applied ecology 30(10):3376–3384.[in Chinese] doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201910.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.RUIZ K B, BIONDI S, MARTINEZ E A, et al. (2016) Quinoa–a model crop for understanding salt-tolerance mechanisms in halophytes. Plant Biosystems 150(2): 357–371. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.HAO H, CAO L, CHEN W N, et al. (2020) Effects of salt stress on the ion balance and physiological-biochemical characteristics of Quercus dentata seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica 40(19): 6897–6904. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.WANG N, QIAN W, LIU X, et al. (2017) Relative contribution of Na+/ K+ homeostasis, photochemical efficiency and antioxidant defense system to different salt tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 119: 121–131. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.08.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.GUO P, WEI H X, ZHANG W J, et al. (2016) Physiological responses of alfalfa to high-level salt stress: root ion flux and stomatal characteristics. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 18(1): 125–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.SINGH V, SINGH A P, BHADORIA J, et al. (2018) Differential expression of salt-responsive genes to salinity stress in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive rice (Oryza sativa L.) at seedling stage. Protoplasma 255(6): 1667–1681. doi: 10.1007/s00709-018-1257-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.ZHOU Q, ZHU Z L (2015) Effects of NaCl stress on seedling growth and mineral ions uptake, distribution and transportation of two varieties of Carpinus L. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 37(12): 7–16. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.ZHU J K (2003) Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 6(5): 441–445. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(03)00085-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.DONG F, CAO J, LI X T, et al. (2016) Effects of various types of salt stress on ion absorption, accumulation and transportation in pea (Pisum sativum) seedlings. Acta Prataculturae Sinice, 25(11): 66–75. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.JIANAER A, YANG C W, SHI D C, et al. (2007) Physiological Response of an Alkali Resistant Halophyte Kochia sieversiana to Salt and Alkali Stresses. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica 27(1): 79–84. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.ZHAO K F (1997) halophyte. Chinese Bulletin of Botany (4): 2–13. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.JIA Y, XIANG Y F, WANG L L, et al. (2020) Effects of salt stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of Primula forbesii. Acta Prataculturae Sinice 29(10): 119–128. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.HAN Y X, CHEN S L, ZHANG Y H, et al. (2013) Exogenous hydrogen peroxide, nitric oxide and calcium mediate root ion fluxes in two non-secretor mangrove species subiected to NaCl stress. Tree Physiology 33(1): 81–95. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.QI Q, MA S R, XU W D (2020) Research progress on the effects of salt stress on plant growth and the physiological mechanism of salt tolerance. Molecular plant breeding 18(8): 2741–2746. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.ZHANG R J, REN F, BAI Y B, et al. (2012) Research progress on the influence of stress on PSII based on the dynamic analysis of fast chlorophyll fluorescence induction. Anhui Agricultural Science 40(7): 3858–3859, 3864. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.PANG Q Y, ZHANG A Q, ZANG W, et al. (2016) Integrated proteomics and metabolomics for dissecting the mechanism of global responses to salt and alkali stress in Suaeda corniculate. Plant and Soil 402(1/2): 379–394. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.WANG Z Y, YANG Y, HUA J F, et al. (2020) Effects of alkali treatment on photosynthetic characteristics and physiology of seedling leaves of Chinese fir 406. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment 29(04): 72–74. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.LI X F, NI Z M, WU Y Y, et al. (2015) Effects of salt stress on photosynthetic characteristics and leaf cell structure of ‘Yinhong’ grape seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica 35(13): 4436–4444. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.YANG J Y, ZHENG W, TIAN Y, et al. (2011) Effects of various mixed salt-alkaline stresses on growth, photosynthesis, and photosynthetic pigment concentrations of Medicago ruthenica seedlings. Photosynthetica 49(2): 275–284. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.LI X X, LIU B X, GUO Z T, et al. (2013) Changes of photosynthetic characteristics and fast chlorophyll fluorescence induced kinetic curve of rhizoma coptidis leaves under NaCl stress. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 24(9): 2479–2484. [in Chinese] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.ZHANG H H, ZHANG X L, LI X, et al. (2012) Effects of NaCl and Na2CO3 stress on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of mulberry seedlings. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 23(3): 625–631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.LI P M, GAO H Y (2005) Application of fast chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics analysis in photosynthesis. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology 31(6): 559–566. [in Chinese] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.KONG F, WANG W C, HU H, et al. (2019) Effects of NaCl Treatment on Photosynthetic and Fast Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics in Herbaceous Peony. Molecular Plant Breeding 17(22): 7531–7537. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.HUANG Q X, ZHAO S, LIU C M, et al. (2015) Effects of Shading Treatments on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics of Sabina vulgaris Seedlings Grown in Iron Tailings Media. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 51(6): 17–26. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.KONG F, LIU X Y, WANG G Z, et al. (2016) Effect of fertilizer application on photosynthesis and fast chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of walnut. Forestry scientific research 29(5): 764–769. [in Chinese] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.LI H, LI H W, LV Y J, et al. (2019) Salt priming protects photosynthetic electron transport against low- temperature-induced damage in wheat. Sensors 20(1): 62. doi: 10.3390/s20010062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.HUANG Q Q, YANG Z Q, LI J S, et al. (2019) Effect of Water and Nitrogen Coupling on Rapid Fluorescence Induction Kinetics Characteristics of Facility Grape Leaves. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology 40(9): 557–573. [in Chinese]. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mayank Gururani

8 Sep 2021

PONE-D-21-23173Effects of salt stress on the photosynthetic physiology and mineral ion absorption and distribution in white willow(Salix alba L.)PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Liu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 24th Sept. 2021. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mayank Gururani

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The study is carefully concepted and methodological approach is satisfactory explained. The manuscript deals with interesting and important changes in response to salt stress on the photosynthetic physiology and mineral ion absorption and distribution in white willow (Salix alba L.). Results and discussion portions are well written. The authors also draw an accurate picture from the results. However, few parameters are missing. The authors should review and cite some more relevant references, and follow suggestion given in detail below. Also needs a proper revision of English language

Many sentences are very confusing. English language and writing style needs to be improved sufficiently

Do not repeat words of the title in the Keywords.

Please for the first use Salix alba L., then please follow the only Salix alba in the manuscript.

Add economic and other importance of plant in introduction to make it more valuable.

It is better to NaCl concentration in mM instead of %.

Line: 25- 27. Please site the reference for hydroponics.

Objective of the study needs to be refined.

Line: 98. Which instrument (its name model, company) used for the determination of ions?

In my opinion, chlorophyll content (a, b, and total) and carotenoids needs to be measured. It have direct link with salt stress and adaptability.

NaCl and RWC have direct link when talking about stress and adaptability. So, I will suggest to study RWC (relative water content) under salt stress.

The effect of salinity on physiology is obvious in every plant. Therefore, authors should narrate and conclude that how their research is different from others and what is the new or strong points of this manuscript.

References need to be revised. Many articles on salinity response are published in high impact factor journals. So try to cite them, so everyone can access the references as well. Also, try to cite the latest articles.

Reviewer #2: As strong adaptability to environmental stress, Salix alba L. has great potential for use and promotion in the ecological management of coastal saline-alkali soil. To investigate the salt tolerance mechanism of Salix alba L, Ren et al treated one-year-old Salix alba L. cuttings with different NaCl concentrations in a hydroponics system. The growth of roots, the ion contents, and the photosynthetic fluorescence parameters under different salt concentrations were detected to evaluate the salt adaption.

The manuscript was well written and the logic of story was clear. All the data supported the issue which is lower salt treatment can not affect the growth of Salix alba L., but the higher salt concentration will destroy the growth of roots then to the plants. To defense the salt stress, Salix alba L. could restrict the ion transportation to maintain normal ion content in leaf. However, this mechanism seems to be general in many plants, as the authors mentioned in the discussion part. But the differences between this paper and previous work was not reflected. I think the most problem of this work is the lack of innovation. And also, as lack of data, the conclusions can not be rich and for further discussion.

Reviewer #3: The manuscript titled “Effects of salt stress on the photosynthetic physiology and mineral ion absorption and distribution in white willow (Salix alba L.)” one of classic example of tree species response to salt stress. The manuscript is well organized and language easy to follow although there were few grammatical and Syntex errors besides SI units. The manuscript can be improved so many ways before making the technical comments and some of my major concerns are;

1. Adapting a hydroponic system to research salt stress may be the most recent best strategy, but there is no way of knowing how the experimental setting was done. Authors may include a photo of the same in order to make any relevant comments.

2. Similarly for rooting length, kindly provide some photo to understand plant response.

3. Throughout the manuscript I can see that salt stress has a significant impact on above-ground biomass, such as leaf area index, shoot length, and so on, but the fact that it was not included in this study is a significant disadvantage. In the meantime, various physiological characteristics have been subjected leaves.

4. When it comes to hydroponic systems, CK medium may be the best option, however, the reaction of Salix alba seedlings is substantially higher than 0.1% NaCl, but no justification from authors how or why although the salt concentration less than 0.1% NaCl.

5. A statistical analysis was performed, however it was not up to scientific merit. For example, the manuscript frequently mentions significance of attributes, but there are no ANOVA tables (except LSD rank), at least as a supplemental to support. I request the authors to include F=xxx, df=xxx, and sig.=>0.001 wherever statistical significance was indicated.

6. Throughout the article, there are discussions about the trends of the morphological and physiological response of plant to the treatments, but the presented table does not provide viewpoints. Authors profusely mentioned the response trends widely without statistical analysis about trends which containing the scatter plot and best fit regression models (r2 and P). I advise authors to use graphs instead of tables, and I've included a sample presentation for ready reference.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr. Sunjeet Kumar

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Edwinraj Esack https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4264-718X

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PlosOne-D-21-23173_Review.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0260086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260086.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


28 Sep 2021

Reply to all comments point-by-point (Manuscript Number: PONE-D-21-23173)

The authors’ replies are in blue.

Editor’s comments:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

[Reply] We have modified the manuscript according to the PLOS ONE's style requirements.

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

[Reply] We will provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access our data. 

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

[Reply] We create a new iD:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1699-7648

COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR:

Reviewer 1#

- The study is carefully concepted and methodological approach is satisfactory explained. The manuscript deals with interesting and important changes in response to salt stress on the photosynthetic physiology and mineral ion absorption and distribution in white willow (Salix alba L.). Results and discussion portions are well written. The authors also draw an accurate picture from the results.

[Reply] Thank you very much for your valuable feedback. We have made corrections based on the suggestions. Please see the manuscript.

- However, few parameters are missing. The authors should review and cite some more relevant references, and follow suggestion given in detail below.

[Reply] We have reviewed and cited more relevant references. Please see line 472-495.

- Also needs a proper revision of English language. Many sentences are very confusing. English language and writing style needs to be improved sufficiently.

[Reply] We have modified the English language appropriately. Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions. We will continue our efforts to improve our English in the future.

- Do not repeat words of the title in the Keywords.

[Reply] We have rewrote Keywords. Please see line 41-43.

- Please for the first use Salix alba L., then please follow the only Salix alba in the manuscript.

[Reply] We have rewrote the name throughout the manuscript. Please look at the example from line 15+18.

- Add economic and other importance of plant in introduction to make it more valuable.

[Reply] We have added economic and other importance of plant in introduction. See Line 64-69 .

- It is better to NaCl concentration in mM instead of %.

[Reply] We've changed % to mM. Please see line 91.

- Line: 25- 27. Please site the reference for hydroponics.

[Reply] We've cited the reference for hydroponics. Please see Line 89 +92-95+441-447.

- Objective of the study needs to be refined.

[Reply] We have refined our research objectives. Please see Line 14-17.

- Line: 98. Which instrument (its name model, company) used for the determination of ions?

[Reply] We have added information about this instrument. We used the atomic absorption spectrometer of Analytikjena in Germany for atomic absorption determination.Please see line 116-117.

- In my opinion, chlorophyll content (a, b, and total) and carotenoids needs to be measured. It have direct link with salt stress and adaptability. NaCl and RWC have direct link when talking about stress and adaptability. So, I will suggest to study RWC (relative water content) under salt stress.

[Reply] This study mainly focuses on the effects of salt ions in plants on photosynthetic performance, without considering chlorophyⅡ and water. Thank you for your valuable suggestions, which will be added and improved in our future studies.

- References need to be revised. Many articles on salinity response are published in high impact factor journals. So try to cite them, so everyone can access the references as well. Also, try to cite the latest articles.

[Reply] We have deleted some references. We have added some influential and recent articles. Please see line 472-495.

COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR:

Reviewer 2#

- However, this mechanism seems to be general in many plants, and also, as lack of data, the conclusions can not be rich and for further discussion.

[Reply] Thank you very much for your suggestions. We have revised the manuscript. Most of the researches on White Willow mainly focus on the medicinal value of substances such as salicin contained in the bark, or the value of studying the enrichment of heavy metals in white willow, which is mainly used to purify water resources and realize agricultural irrigation and fishery breeding. Habitat stress is mainly drought and flooding, but there are few literatures on salt stress, most of which focus on the responses of physiological indexes and photosynthetic indexes of plants to ion absorption and transport under salt stress. This is also one of the reasons for our research. We hope to use white willow as experimental material to observe the various effects of salt stress on plants from this perspective.

COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR:

Reviewer 3#

The manuscript titled “Effects of salt stress on the photosynthetic physiology and mineral ion absorption and distribution in white willow (Salix alba L.)” one of classic example of tree species response to salt stress. The manuscript is well organized and language easy to follow although there were few grammatical and Syntex errors besides SI units.

[Reply] Thank you very much for your suggestions. We have corrected grammatical and syntactic errors .Please see the manuscript.

-1. Adapting a hydroponic system to research salt stress may be the most recent best strategy, but there is no way of knowing how the experimental setting was done. Authors may include a photo of the same in order to make any relevant comments.

[Reply] We have added a picture to the manuscript. Please see the Figure 1.

-2.Similarly for rooting length, kindly provide some photo to understand plant response. 

[Reply] We have added a photo. Please see the figure 2.

-3. Throughout the manuscript I can see that salt stress has a significant impact on above-ground biomass, such as leaf area index, shoot length, and so on, but the fact that it was not included in this study is a significant disadvantage. In the meantime, various physiological characteristics have been subjected leaves.

[Reply] This study mainly focuses on the effects of salt ions in plants on photosynthetic performance, without considering the aspects of leaves and stems. Thank you for your valuable suggestions, which will be added and improved in future research.

-4. When it comes to hydroponic systems, CK medium may be the best option, however, the reaction of Salix alba seedlings is substantially higher than 0.1% NaCl, but no justification from authors how or why although the salt concentration less than 0.1% NaCl.

[Reply] we have made an explanation, please see line 263-269.Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions.

-5. A statistical analysis was performed, however it was not up to scientific merit. For example, the manuscript frequently mentions significance of attributes, but there are no ANOVA tables (except LSD rank), at least as a supplemental to support. I request the authors to include F=xxx, df=xxx, and sig.=>0.001 wherever statistical significance was indicated.

[Reply] We added some these information throughout the manuscript. Please see the example form line 173-175+179+181.

6.Throughout the article, there are discussions about the trends of the morphological and physiological response of plant to the treatments, but the presented table does not provide viewpoints. Authors profusely mentioned the response trends widely without statistical analysis about trends which containing the scatter plot and best fit regression models (r2 and P). I advise authors to use graphs instead of tables, and I've included a sample presentation for ready reference.

[Reply] Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions. We have changed some tables into charts. Please see figure 7.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Mayank Gururani

11 Oct 2021

PONE-D-21-23173R1Effects of salt stress on the photosynthetic physiology and mineral ion absorption and distribution in white willow(Salix alba L.)PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Liu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 25th October 2021. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mayank Gururani

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: All the comments have been addressed. Few minor corrections and suggestion are given below, which needs to be improve

Proper writing style is “Salix alba L.”, not “Salix alba. L”. Correct it and L. should not be italic (keywords and introduction). Also delete the dot after alba “Salix alba.”

Line 40-41: you can cite the 10.3390/antiox9100940 manuscript for latest update about the Chinese areas affected with salinity. For global scenario cite 10.3389/fpls.2021.660409 manuscript

No need to write mM/L. mM is explaining the unit by itself

Still there are many typing and spelling mistakes. Revise the manuscript thoroughly.

Reviewer #3: The author has improved the revised manuscript in numerous ways, but it still lacks scientific merit, novelty, and grammatical errors, in addition to serious issues with SI units. Despite the authors' efforts, to revise the manuscript failed to address the serious concerns of reviewers regarding the experiment's leaf/above ground biomass to support the research. However, without any reasonable justification, the authors submitted the manuscript with careless revision.

Next is statistics and graphs part. The authors made a few changes, but the manuscript required extensive revision. They modified Fig 7, but similar revisions are required for all graphs except Figs 1, 2, and 10, which must be included in the manuscript. The anova results have been included in 165-175 lines, but they must be given wherever the word significant is used.

Figures are should be modified, XY axis legend and labels have to be edited carefully.

The pdf file enclosed contains a list of all typos, grammatical errors, and suggestions.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr. Sunjeet Kumar

Reviewer #3: Yes: Edwinraj Esack

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-23173_R1.pdf

PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0260086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260086.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


24 Oct 2021

REVIEW COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR:

Reviewer 1#

1-All the comments have been addressed. Few minor corrections and suggestion are given below, which needs to be improve.

[Reply] Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions. We have corrected the question you raised. Please look at the following words.

2-Proper writing style is “Salix alba L.”, not “Salix alba. L”. Correct it and L. should not be italic (keywords and introduction). Also delete the dot after alba “Salix alba.”

[Reply] Thank you very much for your advice. We have corrected this writing error in its entirety. We changed ‘Salix alba. L. ’ to ‘ Salix alba L. ’ You can look at line 13 for an example.

We used Salix alba L. at the beginning of the manuscript and Salix alba later.

3-Line 40-41: you can cite the 10.3390/antiox9100940 manuscript for latest update about the Chinese areas affected with salinity. For global scenario cite 10.3389/fpls.2021.660409 manuscript.

[Reply] Thank you for providing us with these two articles, they are very helpful to our article, we have quoted them in line 42-44+421-424.

4-No need to write mM/L. mM is explaining the unit by itself.

[Reply] We have changed mM/L for mM throughout the paper.You can look at line 19 for an example.Thank you very much for your suggestions.

5-Still there are many typing and spelling mistakes. Revise the manuscript thoroughly.

[Reply] Thank you for your advice. We have revised the manuscript thoroughly. We will continue to study English hard in the future.

Finally special thanks to you for your valuable advice. Every suggestion you make will make our manuscript better.

REVIEW COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR:

Reviewer 3#

1-The author has improved the revised manuscript in numerous ways, but it still lacks scientific merit, novelty, and grammatical errors, in addition to serious issues with SI units.Despite the authors' efforts, to revise the manuscript failed to address the serious concerns of reviewers regarding the experiment's leaf/above ground biomass to support the research.

[Reply] Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions.We have changed the error according to the SI units. Most of the researches on White Willow mainly focus on the medicinal value of substances such as salicin contained in the bark, or the value of studying the enrichment of heavy metals in white willow, which is mainly used to purify water resources and realize agricultural irrigation and fishery breeding. Habitat stress is mainly drought and flooding, but there are few literatures on salt stress, most of which focus on the responses of physiological indexes and photosynthetic indexes of plants to ion absorption and transport under salt stress. This is also one of the reasons for our research. We hope to use white willow as experimental material to observe the various effects of salt stress on plants from this perspective. 

In this study, water culture was used to set different salinity gradient, and hard branch cutting was used to analyze the rooting of willow in different salinity. All these measures were to provide theoretical support for willow seedling cultivation in saline-alkali land. In this study, the growth of root system was the key factor to the survival of seedlings, so the rooting index was used in this study. The aboveground biomass can not be used to evaluate the condition of the seedlings because the shoots will die even if they do not take root.

2-Next is statistics and graphs part. The authors made a few changes, but the manuscript required extensive revision. They modified Fig 7, but similar revisions are required for all graphs except Figs 1, 2, and 10, which must be included in the manuscript.

[Reply] Thank you for your advice. We have modified Figs 3,4,5,6,8,9,11,12 and 13. We also used PACE to check our figures.

3-The anova results have been included in 165-175 lines, but they must be given wherever the word significant is used.

[Reply] Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions.We put these data next to the word ‘significant’. Please see line 177-186.

4-Figures are should be modified, XY axis legend and labels have to be edited carefully.

[Reply]Thank you very much for your suggestions. We revised all our Figures according to the journal's requirements.

5-The pdf file enclosed contains a list of all typos, grammatical errors, and suggestions.

[Reply]Thank you very much for your valuable advice. We corrected these errors according to this PDF file.

We will continue to improve our English in the future. Once again, thank you very much for your valuable suggestions..

We appreciate for Editors and reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the corrections will meet with approval.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

Decision Letter 2

Mayank Gururani

1 Nov 2021

PONE-D-21-23173R2Effects of salt stress on the photosynthetic physiology and mineral ion absorption and distribution in white willow(Salix alba L.)PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Liu,

As you had requested earlier, I am sending this submission back to you so you can upload the correct images as mentioned in your email. Please submit your revised manuscript by 10th Nov. 2021. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mayank Gururani

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Dear authors,

As you had requested earlier, I am sending this submission back to you so you can upload the correct images as mentioned in your email.

Kindly submit the revised manuscript asap.

Best regards,

Mayank Gururani

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0260086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260086.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 2


2 Nov 2021

Reviewer 1#

1-All the comments have been addressed. Few minor corrections and suggestion are given below, which needs to be improve.

[Reply] Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions. We have corrected the question you raised. Please look at the following words.

2-Proper writing style is “Salix alba L.”, not “Salix alba. L”. Correct it and L. should not be italic (keywords and introduction). Also delete the dot after alba “Salix alba.”

[Reply] Thank you very much for your advice. We have corrected this writing error in its entirety. We changed ‘Salix alba. L. ’ to ‘ Salix alba L. ’ You can look at line 13 for an example.

We used Salix alba L. at the beginning of the manuscript and Salix alba later.

3-Line 40-41: you can cite the 10.3390/antiox9100940 manuscript for latest update about the Chinese areas affected with salinity. For global scenario cite 10.3389/fpls.2021.660409 manuscript.

[Reply] Thank you for providing us with these two articles, they are very helpful to our article, we have quoted them in line 42-44+421-424.

4-No need to write mM/L. mM is explaining the unit by itself.

[Reply] We have changed mM/L for mM throughout the paper.You can look at line 19 for an example.Thank you very much for your suggestions.

5-Still there are many typing and spelling mistakes. Revise the manuscript thoroughly.

[Reply] Thank you for your advice. We have revised the manuscript thoroughly. We will continue to study English hard in the future.

Finally special thanks to you for your valuable advice. Every suggestion you make will make our manuscript better.

Reviewer 3#

1-The author has improved the revised manuscript in numerous ways, but it still lacks scientific merit, novelty, and grammatical errors, in addition to serious issues with SI units.Despite the authors' efforts, to revise the manuscript failed to address the serious concerns of reviewers regarding the experiment's leaf/above ground biomass to support the research.

[Reply] Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions.We have changed the error according to the SI units. Most of the researches on White Willow mainly focus on the medicinal value of substances such as salicin contained in the bark, or the value of studying the enrichment of heavy metals in white willow, which is mainly used to purify water resources and realize agricultural irrigation and fishery breeding. Habitat stress is mainly drought and flooding, but there are few literatures on salt stress, most of which focus on the responses of physiological indexes and photosynthetic indexes of plants to ion absorption and transport under salt stress. This is also one of the reasons for our research. We hope to use white willow as experimental material to observe the various effects of salt stress on plants from this perspective. 

In this study, water culture was used to set different salinity gradient, and hard branch cutting was used to analyze the rooting of willow in different salinity. All these measures were to provide theoretical support for willow seedling cultivation in saline-alkali land. In this study, the growth of root system was the key factor to the survival of seedlings, so the rooting index was used in this study. The aboveground biomass can not be used to evaluate the condition of the seedlings because the shoots will die even if they do not take root.

2-Next is statistics and graphs part. The authors made a few changes, but the manuscript required extensive revision. They modified Fig 7, but similar revisions are required for all graphs except Figs 1, 2, and 10, which must be included in the manuscript.

[Reply] Thank you for your advice. We have modified Figs 3,4,5,6,8,9,11,12 and 13. We also used PACE to check our figures.

3-The anova results have been included in 165-175 lines, but they must be given wherever the word significant is used.

[Reply] Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions.We put these data next to the word ‘significant’. Please see line 177-186.

4-Figures are should be modified, XY axis legend and labels have to be edited carefully.

[Reply]Thank you very much for your suggestions. We revised all our Figures according to the journal's requirements.

5-The pdf file enclosed contains a list of all typos, grammatical errors, and suggestions.

[Reply]Thank you very much for your valuable advice. We corrected these errors according to this PDF file.

We will continue to improve our English in the future. Once again, thank you very much for your valuable suggestions.

We appreciate for Editors and reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the corrections will meet with approval.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

Decision Letter 3

Mayank Gururani

3 Nov 2021

Effects of salt stress on the photosynthetic physiology and mineral ion absorption and distribution in white willow(Salix alba L.)

PONE-D-21-23173R3

Dear Dr. Liu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mayank Gururani

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Mayank Gururani

9 Nov 2021

PONE-D-21-23173R3

Effects of salt stress on the photosynthetic physiology and mineral ion absorption and distribution in white willow (Salix alba L.)

Dear Dr. Liu:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Mayank Gururani

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Appendix. Effects of salt stress on the contents of three ions in roots and leaves of Salix alba L.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PlosOne-D-21-23173_Review.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-23173_R1.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.doc

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its S1 Appendix files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES