Abstract
Mice have served as an excellent model to understand the etiology of lung cancer for years. However, data regarding dual-stage carcinogenesis of lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remain elusive. Therefore, we aim to develop pre-malignant (PM) and malignant (M) lung SCC in vivo using N-nitroso-tris-chloroethylurea (NTCU). BALB/C mice were allotted into two main groups; PM and M groups which received treatment for 15 and 30 weeks, respectively. Then, the mice in each main group were allotted into three groups; control, vehicle, and cancer (n = 6), which received normal saline, 70% acetone, and 0.04 M NTCU by skin painting, respectively. Histopathologically, we discovered a mix of hyperplasia, metaplasia, and dysplasia lesions in the PM group and intracellular bridge; an SCC feature in the M group. The M group was positive for cytokeratin 5/6 protein which confirmed the lung SCC subtype. We also found significantly higher (P < 0.05) epithelium thickness in the cancer groups as compared to the vehicle and control groups at both the PM and M. Overall, this study discovered that NTCU is capable of developing PM and M lung SCC in mice model at appropriate weeks and the vehicle group was suggested to be adequate as control group for future research.
Subject terms: Cancer models, Non-small-cell lung cancer
Introduction
Lung cancer (LC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide with an estimated 1.8 million deaths in 20201. Lung cancer is histologically classified into two types: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The NSCLC subtype accounts for 85% of all lung cancer cases, which are further classified into three main subtypes: large cell lung cancer, adenocarcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Due to their poor therapeutic responses2 and low survival rate3, lung SCC subtypes have received increased attention in the past decades. However, the etiology of lung SCC remains poorly understood. Lung SCC is a heterogeneous disease that progresses through multiple stages4,5. Moreover, the lung SCC subtype has a complex and distinct genetic background when compared to other NSCLC subtypes6–9, which may explain the limitations of current NSCLC therapy in treating lung SCC patients. Notably, most of the studies on NSCLC and lung SCC were conducted in vitro instead of in vivo or animal model10. Thus, there is an urgent need to establish well-characterized and reliable lung SCC animal models for pre-clinical studies that will provide novel insight into lung SCC biology in the future.
The use of mice in pre-clinical lung cancer studies has been shown to improve our understanding of disease pathogenesis and elucidate therapeutic options11. According to a growing number of studies, chemical-induced cancer in animals is the best model for understanding cancer etiology and carcinogenesis as it closely mimics chronic environmental carcinogen exposure12. In this regard, N-nitroso-tris-chloroethylurea (NTCU); a component of nitrosoalkylureas, has been shown to induce lung SCC in mice models with a high degree of similarity and comparable histology to human lung SCC5,13–16. According to Wang et al., NTCU can introduce the same sequence of lung SCC lesions seen in humans, namely ‘normal-hyperplasia-metaplasia-dysplasia-SCC’5. Moreover, RNA sequencing of lung SCC induced in the animal model using NTCU showed a high percentage of mutation similarity to human SCC17. As a result, this model closely resembles human SCC and has been proposed as a feasible reservoir to define SCC biology, which is still poorly understood.
However, the use of NTCU still possess some challenges due to the disparity in the ability of NTCU to induce lung SCC in different strains of mice. Notably, the disparity was also influenced by the dose, volume, and duration of NTCU treatment. Thus, the use of an optimal dose, volume, and duration of treatment, as well as the use of the appropriate strain of mice, is essential to achieve the desired outcome following the research objective. Moreover, the characterization of NTCU-induced lung SCC at the pre-malignant and malignant stages, which is critical for testing the best candidate drugs and preventive agents in pre-clinical studies, is still poorly understood. Therefore, the present study aims to develop the PM and M stages of lung SCC using NTCU and classify the dual-stage based on SCC lesions characteristics in BALB/c mice, which was categorized as an intermediate susceptibility strain to lung SCC carcinogen. The severity of the lesions is determined by referring to histopathology scores and measuring epithelium thickness. Lung SCC subtype of lung cancer was confirmed by positive immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin (CK) 5/6 protein, an SCC Biomarker.
Results
Specific pre-malignant and malignant stages of lung SCC subtype by NTCU
H&E staining is a gold standard assay for determining tissue histology. In this study, SCC lesions were classified as pre-malignant (PM) and malignant (M) stages based on the layer of epithelial cells, the appearance of squamous cells that replaces epithelial cells, the nucleus to cytoplasm ratio, and the formation of intracellular bridges and/or keratin pearls. Figure 1 depicts the H&E staining at the bronchial area after 15 weeks of treatment with normal saline (a and b), acetone (c and d), and NTCU (e and f). Figure 2 shows the H&E staining at the bronchial area after 30 weeks of treatment with normal saline (a and b), acetone (c and d), and NTCU (e and f). Tissues were then scored based on the histology characteristics observed in three sections per mouse, and the score obtained for both treatment durations are shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1.
Group | Histology characteristic | Stage of carcinogenesis | n | Score (Mean ± SEM) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Normal | No | 6 | 0 |
Vehicle | Normal | No | 6 | 0 |
Cancer | Hyperplasia, Metaplasia, and Dysplasia | Early and Intermediate | 6 | 2.00 ± 0.29* |
*Significant difference (P < 0.05) between cancer with vehicle and control groups.
Table 2.
Group | Histology characteristic | Stage of carcinogenesis | n | Score (Mean ± SEM) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | Normal | No | 6 | 0 |
Vehicle | Normal | No | 6 | 0 |
Cancer | SCC | Final | 6 | 4.00 ± 0.00* |
*Significant difference (P < 0.05) between cancer with vehicle and control groups.
In general, mice that were induced with normal saline and acetone for 15 dan 30 weeks show normal bronchial epithelial cell characteristics (Score 0), as represented by a single layer of regular cell shape. This normal characteristic was pointed by arrows in Fig. 1b and d, and Fig. 2b and d at 40× magnification. Meanwhile, mice treated with NTCU for 15 weeks develop a mix of hyperplasia, metaplasia, and dysplasia lesions that can be categorized as PM. Notably, hyperplasia and metaplasia lesions were the most frequent type of lesions discovered, explaining the score of 2.00 ± 0.29. The hyperplasia lesion, presented as multiple and stratified layers of bronchial epithelial cells was pointed by an arrow in Fig. 1f at 40X magnification. Furthermore, mice induced with NTCU for 30 weeks show a mixture of SCC in situ and invasive SCC lesions (score 4), which can be categorized as M stage. The SCC lesions are indicated by arrows in Fig. 2f and g, which shows a cancer cell with a high nuclear to cytoplasm ratio and an intracellular bridge. The intracellular bridge is the distinguishing feature of SCC besides the keratin pearl. However, keratin pearl was not observed in this study.
NTCU-induced lung SCC in female BALB/c mice was found to be histopathologically similar to human lung SCC, suggesting the high reproducibility of NTCU in producing a comparable model of human lung SCC in mice. Table 3 describes the explanation for each lung SCC stage based on the histology characteristic discovered in this study.
Table 3.
Stages | Characteristics |
---|---|
Normal | Single layer of columnar bronchial epithelial cells |
Hyperplasia | > 1 layer of columnar bronchial epithelial cells |
Metaplasia | Columnar bronchial epithelial cells were replaced by squamous epithelial cells while maintaining hyperplasia characteristic |
Dysplasia | A high degree of nuclear pleomorphism and horizontally orientated nuclei were observed at the upper epithelium. The cells also lose orderly differentiation, irregular in shape, and have a high nucleus to cytoplasm ratio through the entire thickened epithelium |
SCC | The neoplastic cells become irregular in shape, increased nucleus to cytoplasm ratio, and some nuclei were observed as hyperchromatic. The cancer cells are capable of invading surrounding stroma by breaching the basement membrane |
Increased epithelium thickness in NTCU-induced pre-malignant and malignant stages
The thickness of the bronchial epithelium was measured from H&E staining and is shown in Fig. 3. At the PM stage, the epithelium thickness of the cancer group (20.72 ± 1.27 μm) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that of the control (11.05 ± 0.23 µm) and vehicle (11.53 ± 0.35 µm) groups. Similarly, at the M stage, the epithelium thickness of the cancer group (39.71 ± 2.27 µm) was found to be significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the control (11.54 ± 0.33 µm) and vehicle (10.86 ± 0.34 µm) groups. Moreover, we found that the bronchial epithelium thickness in the cancer group at the M stage was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in the cancer group at the PM stage. Besides, there was no significant difference in epithelium thickness between control and vehicle from the same stage of carcinogenesis or between two different stages.
Lung SCC subtype confirmation by cytokeratin 5/6 protein expression
IHC staining for cytokeratin 5/6 (CK 5/6) protein, an SCC marker was determined around the bronchial tissue of the M stage. Based on the histological observations, the M cancer group from 30 weeks of NTCU treatment has SCC histological feature, and CK 5/6 protein expression was evaluated to confirm this subtype. As shown in Fig. 4, the cancer group shows positive brown DAB staining for CK 5/6 protein as compared to vehicle. Figure 5 shows a bar chart of DAB pixel intensity, which corresponds to quantitative CK 5/6 protein expression. Based on the bar chart, the cancer group had a significantly higher percentage of pixel intensity (P < 0.05) which was 6.36 ± 0.86% as compared to the vehicle group; 0.44 ± 0.18%.
Discussion
Aside from human tumor xenografts and transgenic animals, chemically induced lung cancers in animal models are also widely used in the studies of lung cancer12. N-nitroso-tris-chloroethylurea (NTCU) is commonly used to induce lung SCC in mouse models, as it gives reproducible results13–15,17–23. NTCU is also easy to administer, requiring only skin painting as compared to benzo(α)pyrene which requires direct instillation into the trachea24,25. Once absorbed through the skin, NTCU acts as an alkylating agent, causing DNA mutation and cancer26. The effectiveness of NTCU in inducing lung SCC depends on the strain of mice, which can be classified into three categories: susceptible (e.g., A/J, NIH Swiss dan SWR/J), intermediate (e.g., BALB/c dan FVB/J), and resistant (e.g., AKR/J, 129/svJ dan C57BL/6 J)13. In this study, we characterized the PM and M stages of lung SCC using NTCU in BALB/c mice which were categorized as the intermediate strain. Our study was the first to determine the optimal treatment duration for inducing PM and M lung SCCs i.e., 15 and 30 weeks, respectively. Briefly, a mixture of hyperplastic, metaplastic, and dysplastic lesions was observed after 15 weeks of NTCU treatment. Together they constitute the PM stage of lung SCC, since the epithelial cells in these lesions were found in prior studies to harbour genetic abnormalities driving the growth of malignant or cancer cells27–29. A mixture of SCC in situ and invasive SCC was observed after 30 weeks of NTCU treatment. They were classified as the M stage because the cancer cells have the potential to invade the surrounding stroma in SCC in situ and metastasize in invasive SCC29.
PM lung SCC has been successfully induced in several prior studies13,18–20. The earliest is by Wang et al. which reported that hyperplastic lesions formed in all categories of mouse strains after 32 weeks of treatment13. However, the exact treatment duration for inducing PM lung SCC was not determined. Another study was conducted to evaluate the effect of different durations of NTCU treatments (4, 8, 12, 16, 25, and 32 weeks) on the types of lung SCC lesions18. It was found that bronchial dysplastic lesions only formed after 25 weeks of NTCU treatment, which is inconsistent with our observation that bronchial dysplasia was induced after 15 weeks of NTCU treatment. It is worth noting that the study by Ghosh et al. used a lower NTCU dose of 0.02 M, as compared to 0.04 M used in our study. This may explain the longer time required to induce bronchial dysplasia, although the same intermediate strain was used which is FVB/n mice13,18. Nevertheless, our tested duration to induce PM stage; 15 weeks was fitted in the range of duration treatment tested by Riolobos et al. which observed hyperplastic lesions after 8 weeks of NTCU treatment and a combination of high-grade hyperplasia, metaplasia, and high-grade dysplasia after 24 weeks of NTCU treatment in FVB/n mice20. We also showed that 30 weeks of treatment was sufficient to induce advanced lung SCC in BALB/c mice, rather than the 32 weeks used by Wang et al.13. This improvement in shortening the period of carcinogen exposure in experimental animals is crucial to minimize the adverse effects caused by the carcinogen. Notably, some studies reported successful induction of lung SCC after 20 weeks21 and 28 weeks of NTCU treatment17. However, the susceptible mouse strains, namely A/J and NIH Swiss, were used in these studies, which may explain the shorter time needed to induce lung SCC.
Additionally, we found that NTCU induced lung SCC through progressive transformations of normal cells in a sequence similar to the pathogenesis of human lung SCC i.e., ‘hyperplasia-metaplasia-dysplasia-SCC’. Our findings are in accordance with a study conducted by Wang et al., who also observed the same sequence of transformations leading to lung SCC lesions in NTCU-treated A/J mice5, confirming the reproducibility and reliability of NTCU-based protocols in inducing lung SCC that closely mimics human lung SCC. Another point worth considering is the dose-dependent action of NTCU. We applied 25 µL of 0.04 M NTCU twice a week to induce lung SCC, as similar dosage was used in previous studies to induce advanced lung SCC in an intermediate strain of mice after 32 weeks of treatment13,14,20. Notably, a lower concentration of 0.02 M was found to yield variable success rates in inducing lung SCC in FVB/n mice. Ghosh et al. found that a concentration of 0.02 M effectively induced lung SCC18; but the same concentration and period of treatment was reported by Riolobos et al. to have failed to induce lung SCC20. In some studies, substantially lower concentrations of 0.008 M and 0.004 M were tested and found to be unable to induce lung SCC after 32 weeks14. Considering the findings of these studies, we suggest that 0.04 M is the optimum NTCU concentration for inducing lung SCC in BALB/c mice.
Because most lung SCC originate in the bronchi epithelial cells, epithelium thickness assessment has become one of the grading criteria for pulmonary lesions of lung SCC30,31. Epithelium thickness marks the progression of lung SCC growth, as evaluated in this study. We found that the bronchial epithelium thickened in the cancer group at both the PM and M stages, as the cells proliferated uncontrollably, resulting in the formation of more than one layer of surface bronchial epithelium, a condition known as hyperplasia. The thickness significantly increased from the PM to the M stage as cell proliferation continued to exceed cell apoptosis32,33. In fact, increased proliferation of bronchial epithelium was observed in NTCU-induced lung SCC in vivo16,18. Our findings are in line with a study by Surien et al., who found increased epithelium thickness in BALB/c mice after NTCU treatment15. For the analysis, we only measured the epithelium thickness of normal to SCC in situ stages as invasive SCC lacks intact basement membranes and cellular organisation, which are both required for epithelium thickness measurement. Based on our findings from the analysis of histopathology and epithelium thickness, we suggest that the vehicle group, which received 70% acetone alone, is adequate as a valid control group because it does not differ significantly from the control group which received normal saline in histological characteristics, histopathology scores, and epithelium thickness. Moreover, the 70% acetone used in the vehicle group had no adverse effects on the mice, as observed in the control group, which received normal saline.
In assessing the histological features of SCC, the formation of intracellular bridges alongside other SCC characteristics, particularly keratin pearls were evaluated. In this study, we found no keratin pearls in the M stage of lung tissue, indicating that our lung SCC model was poorly differentiated. Therefore, immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was used to confirm the lung SCC subtype. According to the 2015 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of lung tumors, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was recommended as the first guideline for classifying lung cancer34. These additional assessments are required to increase the accuracy of lung cancer classification and, as a result, maximize therapeutic benefit as treatments differ depending on the type of lung cancer35. Cytokeratin 5/6 (CK 5/6), P40, and P63 are the most commonly used biomarkers to confirm the squamous lineage or lung SCC. These biomarkers are highly expressed in SCC and have been studied extensively13,14,21. Figure 5 shows that positive CK 5/6 protein expression in lung tissues treated with NTCU for 30 weeks confirmed the lung SCC subtype. CK5/6 is a large molecular weight cytokeratin and is expressed in cancers of epithelial origin, such as oesophageal, cervix, and lung SCC36–39. The protein was found to be expressed in 91.7% of primary and 100% of metastatic lung SCC40. The adenocarcinoma subtype of lung cancer also expressed CK 5/6 but to an appreciably lesser extent than lung SCC; 22.2% of primary adenocarcinomas and 15.4% of metastatic adenocarcinomas have been found to express CK5/640.
Despite its usefulness, this model has a few limitations. The extended treatment duration required to induce lung SCC could result in toxicity, skin inflammation, and reduced gain in body weight. Furthermore, NTCU has been shown to elicit heterogeneous responses depending on the mouse strain. Therefore, the optimal NTCU dosage may vary with the mouse strain used, the research aims, and the experimental designs. Pilot studies may be necessary for new regimens of NTCU treatments to ensure maximum efficacy and reproducibility in inducing SCC lesions in the selected strain of mice.
Conclusion
We discovered NTCU to be a potent chemical capable of inducing lung SCC through multiple steps which allowed for pre-malignant and malignant characterization to be evaluated in BALB/c mice. The malignant stage lung tissue was positive for CK 5/6 which indicated an SCC subtype of lung cancer. Although the NTCU-induced lung SCC mouse models still fall short of accurately replicating the complexity of human lung cancer, the high histopathology similarity suggests that this model is the best at mimicking human lung SCC disease and could be a useful tool to increase our understanding of the disease. From this study also, we suggested that normal saline be excluded as a control group since the acetone-treated group or vehicle group alone is adequate as a control group, reducing the number of animals involved in research. Our suggestion is to uphold the 3Rs principle of animal study, which are reduction, replacement, and refinement.
Materials and methods
Animals
All procedures involving the use of animals were subjected to approval from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Animal Ethics Committee (UKMAEC) (FSK/2017/FATHIAH/24-MAY/846-MAY-2017-MAY-2020). All experimental procedures involving animal were conducted in accordance with the UKMAEC guidelines. This study was also carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines. Five weeks old female BALB/c mice with an average weight of 12–16 g were obtained from the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, and were allowed to adapt to laboratory conditions for two weeks with ad libitum access to water and normal mice diet before the experiment started. Throughout the experiment, all mice were housed under the same laboratory conditions of ambient room temperature and lighting (12 h light–dark cycle). The mice were randomly allotted into two main groups; pre-malignant (PM) and malignant (M). Then, the mice were further assigned into three groups with n = 6 per group: control (received normal saline), vehicle (received 70% acetone), and cancer group (received 25 µL of 0.04 NTCU). The treatment was given twice a week with an interval of 3.5 days for 15 weeks for PM stage groups and 30 weeks for M stage groups via skin painting at the dorsal back between shoulder blades. All mice were euthanized by an overdose of ketamine-xylazine and cervical dislocation at the end of the experiment.
Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) staining
The harvested lung tissues were immediately washed with phosphate buffer saline (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) before being fixed in 10% formalin (Bendosen, Malaysia) for 24 h. Then, the tissues were processed using a tissue processor (Leica TP1020, Germany) and embedded in paraffin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) using a tissue embedder (Leica EG1160, Germany). The tissues were sectioned into 4 µm of thickness using a microtome (Leica RM2135, Germany) from the centre area as lung SCC usually arises centrally. The sectioning was also performed perpendicularly to the bronchi divergence and one section was selected consistently in every five sections (approximately 20 µm apart). After that, the tissues were deparaffinized with xylene (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and rehydrated in graded alcohol (HmbG Chemicals, Malaysia). For H&E staining, the tissues were then stained with hematoxylin (Leica Biosystem, USA), eosin (R&M Chemicals, Malaysia), and dehydrated with alcohol (HmbG Chemicals, Malaysia) and xylene (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) before being mounted with DPX (R&M Chemicals, Malaysia). Tissues were viewed using a light microscope (Nikon Corporation, Japan), and histological scoring of lung SCC was performed with an assistant of a veterinary pathologist. Three different sections of tissues were examined per mouse for histological scoring. The scoring was recorded as follow: normal bronchus = 0, presents with single-layer columnar epithelium; hyperplasia = 1, presents with more than one layer of the columnar epithelium; metaplasia = 2, presents with a combination of columnar and squamous epithelium while maintaining hyperplastic characteristic; dysplasia = 3, presents with disorientation, hyperchromatic and a high degree of nuclear polymorphism cells while maintaining hyperplastic and metaplastic characteristic; SCC in situ /invasive SCC = 4, presents with high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio cells, intracellular bridge, invasive cancer out of basement membrane15. Similarly, epithelium thickness was also measured from three different sections per mouse using ImageJ software (Bethesda, Maryland, USA). Three different airways were chosen from a single section. The epithelium thickness was then measured at three different adjacent areas from a single airway. In brief, the average of epithelium thickness obtained from a mouse was calculated from the cumulative mean of three different areas per airway and three different airways per section.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining
Paraffin-embedded samples were sectioned to 4 µm sections on the charged slide (Porlab Scientific, China) and dried overnight at room temperature. After that, the tissues were deparaffinized in an oven at 60 °C and transferred in xylene for complete removal of paraffin. Then, the tissues were rehydrated in absolute alcohol and incubated with antigen retrieval solution (1 × 10 mM sodium citrate buffer) (Merck, Germany). After that, endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 3% H2O2 (Merck, Germany) for 10 min, and non-specific antibody binding sites were then blocked with 10% normal goat serum (NGS) (Dako, Denmark) for 10 min. The tissues were then incubated with CK 5/6 antibody (diluted to 1:150; Catalog No. PA5-1748; Cell signaling, USA) overnight at 4 °C and incubated with goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (diluted to 1:100; Catalog No. PI-1000; Vector Laboratories, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, the reactions were developed using the 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Dako, Denmark) and counterstaining was performed with hematoxylin. Negative control tissues were incubated with 10% NGS without primary antibody. Semi-quantitative analysis of total pixel intensity of positive DAB brown staining was analyzed using ImageJ FIJI software (Java 8 version 64-bit).
Statistical analysis
All data are presented as mean ± SEM of at least three biological replicates and analyzed using GraphPad Prism version 8.3.0. The normality test was carried out using Shapiro–Wilk. The differences between groups were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and student’s t-test. Statistical significance was considered when P < 0.05.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia, under grant FRGS/1/2018/SKK06/UKM/03/1 for financial support.
Author contributions
M.A.Z. and S.F.M. were employed in the data analysis, drafting, and manuscript writing of the manuscript. S.F.M., E.W.C., N.F.R., and G.T.S. provided substantial contributions to the supervision, finalization, correction, and critical reviewing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Sung H, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 Countries. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liang S, et al. Efficacy of icotinib in advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2018;7:4456–4466. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang B-Y, et al. The comparison between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in lung cancer patients. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2020;146:43–52. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03079-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Minna JD, Roth JA, Gazdar AF. Focus on lung cancer. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:49–52. doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(02)00027-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang Y, et al. Chemoprevention of lung squamous cell carcinoma in mice by a mixture of Chinese herbs. Cancer Prev. Res. 2009;2:634–641. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-09-0052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gandara DR, Hammerman PS, Sos ML, Lara PN, Hirsch FR. Squamous cell lung cancer: from tumor genomics to cancer therapeutics. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015;21:2236–2243. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhao W, et al. ALK, ROS1 and RET rearrangements in lung squamous cell carcinoma are very rare. Lung Cancer. 2016;94:22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hammerman PS, et al. Comprehensive genomic characterization of squamous cell lung cancers. Nature. 2012;489:519–525. doi: 10.1038/nature11404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Miyamae Y, et al. Significance of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in squamous cell lung carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2011;25:921–928. doi: 10.3892/or.2011.1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zakaria MA, Rajab NF, Chua EW, Selvarajah GT, Masre SF. Roles of Rho-associated kinase in lung cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2021;58:185–198. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2020.5164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kwon M, Berns A. mouse models for lung cancer. Lancet. 2013;358:2135. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Liu, J. & Johnston, M. R. Experimental animal models for studying lung cancer. in Lung Cancer Metastasis 241–265 (Springer, 2009).
- 13.Wang Y, et al. A chemically induced model for squamous cell carcinoma of the lung in mice: histopathology and strain susceptibility. Cancer Res. 2004;64:1647–1654. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hudish TM, et al. N-nitroso-tris-chloroethylurea induces premalignant squamous dysplasia in mice. Cancer Prev. Res. 2012;5:283–290. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Surien, O., Ghazali, A. R. & Fathiah Masre, S. Histopathological effect of pterostilbene as chemoprevention in N-NITROSO-TRI-CHLOROETHYLUREA (NTCU)-Induced lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) mouse model. Histol. Histopathol. (2020). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 16.Surien O, Ghazali AR, Masre SF. Chemopreventive effects of pterostilbene through p53 and cell cycle in mouse lung of squamous cell carcinoma model. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94508-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xiong D, et al. Novel mutational landscapes and expression signatures of lung squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2018;9:7424–7441. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ghosh M, et al. Tracheal dysplasia precedes bronchial dysplasia in mouse model of N-nitroso trischloroethylurea induced squamous cell lung cancer. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yamano S, et al. Role of deltaNp63posCD44vpos cells in the development of N-nitroso-tris-chloroethylurea-induced peripheral-type mouse lung squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer Sci. 2016;107:123–132. doi: 10.1111/cas.12855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Riolobos L, et al. The effect of mouse strain, sex, and carcinogen dose on toxicity and the development of lung dysplasia and squamous cell carcinomas in mice. Cancer Prev. Res. 2019;12:507–516. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-18-0442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Azpilikueta A, et al. Successful immunotherapy against a transplantable mouse squamous lung carcinoma with anti-PD-1 and anti-CD137 monoclonal antibodies. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2016;11:524–536. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lieberman R, Pan J, Zhang Q, You M. Rad52 deficiency decreases development of lung squamous cell carcinomas by enhancing immuno-surveillance. Oncotarget. 2017;8:34032–34044. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.You MS, Rouggly LC, You M, Wang Y. Mouse models of lung squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013;32:77–82. doi: 10.1007/s10555-012-9406-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yoshimoto T, et al. Differential induction of squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas in mouse lung by intratracheal instillation of benzo(a)pyrene and charcoal powder. Cancer Res. 1980;40:4301–4307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lijinsky W, Reuber MD. Neoplasms of the skin and other organs observed in Swiss mice treated with nitrosoalkylureas. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 1988;114:245–249. doi: 10.1007/BF00405829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Goodsell DS. The molecular perspective: nicotine and nitrosamines. Stem Cells. 2004;22:645–646. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.22-4-645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brambilla E, et al. p53 mutant immunophenotype and deregulation of p53 transcription pathway (Bcl2, Bax, and Waf1) in precursor bronchial lesions of lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 1998;4:1609–1618. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Denisov EV, et al. Premalignant lesions of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: the molecular make-up and factors affecting their progression. Lung Cancer. 2019;135:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kerr KM. Pulmonary preinvasive neoplasia. J. Clin. Pathol. 2001;54:257–271. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.4.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dacic S. Pulmonary preneoplasia. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2008;132:1073–1078. doi: 10.5858/2008-132-1073-PP. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rooney C, Sethi T. The epithelial cell and lung cancer: the link between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer. Respiration. 2011;81:89–104. doi: 10.1159/000323946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hanahan D, Coussens LM. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:309–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zakaria MA, Rajab NF, Chua EW, Selvarajah GT, Masre SF. The roles of tissue rigidity and its underlying mechanisms in promoting tumor growth. Cancer Invest. 2020;38:445–462. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2020.1802474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Travis WD, et al. The 2015 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors: impact of genetic, clinical and radiologic advances since the 2004 classification. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2015;10:1243–1260. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lemjabbar-Alaoui H, Hassan OUI, Yang YW, Buchanan P. Lung cancer: biology and treatment options. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 2015;1856:189–210. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chu PG, Weiss LM. Expression of cytokeratin 5/6 in epithelial neoplasms: an immunohistochemical study of 509 cases. Mod. Pathol. 2002;15:6–10. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li H, et al. A combination of cytokeratin 5/6, p63, p40 and MUC5AC are useful for distinguishing squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Diagn. Pathol. 2020;15:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13000-020-01018-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Whithaus K, Fukuoka J, Prihoda TJ, Jagirdar J. Evaluation of napsin A, cytokeratin 5/6, p63, and thyroid transcription factor 1 in adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2012;136:155–162. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0232-OA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dimaio MA, Kwok S, Montgomery KD, Lowe AW, Pai RK. Immunohistochemical panel for distinguishing esophageal adenocarcinoma from squamous cell carcinoma: a combination of p63, cytokeratin 5/6, MUC5AC, and anterior gradient homolog 2 allows optimal subtyping. Hum. Pathol. 2012;43:1799–1807. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.03.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gurda GT, et al. Utility of five commonly used immunohistochemical markers TTF-1, Napsin A, CK7, CK5/6 and P63 in primary and metastatic adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: a retrospective study of 246 fine needle aspiration cases. Clin. Transl. Med. 2015;4:1–13. doi: 10.1186/s40169-015-0057-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]