Abstract
Clostridioides difficile causes nosocomial diarrhoea associated with antibiotic use and immunodeficiency. Although the number of paediatric C. difficile infections (CDIs) has increased worldwide, there are few studies on the molecular characterization of strains causing CDIs among children. We report the clinical features and strain molecular characterization of a CDI in a female child with a history of liver transplantation at 7 months of age. This is the first report of the 046 ribotype causing paediatric diarrhoea.
Keywords: Clostridioides difficile infection, liver transplant, molecular characterisation, paediatric
Introduction
Clostridioides difficile is an anaerobic Gram-positive spore-forming bacillus that is usually spread via the faecal–oral route, and is a primary cause of antibitioc-associated diarrhoea in hospitalized patients [1, 2].
C. difficile has increasingly been reported as an important pathogen in children in recent years [3–5]. This pathogen is responsible for a broad spectrum of diseases in children, ranging from secretory diarrhoea to pseudomembranous colitis, toxic megacolon, intestinal perforation and septic shock [6]. Nevertheless, the incidence and severity of C. difficile infections (CDIs) are not completely understood in this population [7]. Some reported risk factors for CDIs include advanced age, continued use of antibiotics, use of proton pump inhibitors and prolonged hospitalization [8, 9].
The literature has few reports on the occurrence of CDI in transplant paediatric patients, despite the fact that transplant recipients should be more susceptible to CDI because of multiple hospitalizations and immunosupression [10, 11]. A retrospective review of an institutional database in Germany reported CDIs in children after liver and kidney transplant without strain characterization [12]. Molecular characterization reveals how a strain evolves and is transmitted, and it is also important for surveillance and infection control of CDI. Here, we report a case of CDI in a child who received a liver transplant, including molecular characterization of the C. difficile strain.
Case report
A 2.5-year-old girl with a history of liver transplantation at 7 months of age was admitted with diarrhoea at Albert Sabin Children’s Hospital in Fortaleza, Brazil. The stool was bloody and mucoid, with an average frequency of six bowel movements per day, which was unrelated to diet, but was associated with diffuse abdominal pain. There was no vomiting. Physical examination revealed that the patient was in good general condition and afebrile, eupneic, hydrated, anicteric, acyanotic and without cardiopulmonary alterations. Her abdomen was distended but soft and non-tender, with the liver edge 3 cm below the right costal border and the spleen 4 cm below the left costal border. Thorax percussion gave normal results on auscultation.
The compete blood count revealed leukocytosis with neutropenia and lymphocytosis (10 420 mm−3, neutrophils 24 % and lymphocytes 53 %), low haemoglobin (10.5 g dl−1), normal platelets (191 600 mm−3) and normal renal function (urea 26 ml dl−1 and creatinine 0.2 mg dl−1). We did not detect intestinal parasites (i.e. protozoa and helminths), gastrointestinal viruses, gastrointestinal viruses, or enteric pathogens in the patient’s stool sample.
The patient had three prior diarrhoeal illnesses. Her past medical history was notable for biliary atresia diagnosed when she was 3 months of age. A liver transplant was performed when she was 7 months old, and she has been taking immunosuppressive medication (prednisone/tacrolimus/mycophenolate sodium) since that time. No proton pump inhibitor was prescribed.
At our hospital, an initial screen for C. difficile toxins is performed for all patients with diarrhoea who have risk factors. A stool sample was examined on the third day of the onset of diarrhoea that was positive for C. difficile toxin A/B (we used ProSpecT Clostridium difficile Toxin A/B Microplate Remel). We cultured the sample on selective CCFA media (cefoxitin–cycloserine–fructose agar, Oxoid) as well as on fastidious anaerobe broth (FAB), over 5 and 15 days, respectively. We incubated the samples in anaerobic conditions (90 % N2, 10 % CO2). The FAB-positive broth was inoculated onto another CCFA media plate. Characteristic C. difficile colonies appeared on CCFA [13]. These were tinged with yellow colour, and presented a ground-glass appearance characterized by circular elements with slightly filamentous edges. These were flat to low with rounded elevations. We inoculated the colonies onto Brucella agar with 5 % lysed sheep blood and vitamin K (5 mg ml−1) to identify them further and to perform molecular tests.
The C. difficile isolates were confirmed using the RapID ANAII system (Remel) and by PCR amplification [14]of the tpi gene ( C. difficile housekeeping gene).
Using a previously reported method [14], we obtained positive results for amplification assays for tcdA and tcdB gene fragments of PaLoc. By contrast, we obtained negative results for the binary toxin gene cdtB as well as the putative regulatory gene tcdC. We conducted molecular strain typing by amplification of the 16S–23S rRNA intergenic spacer sequences [15] and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with SmaI genomic DNA digestion, as described previously [14]. PCR ribotypes were determined by subjecting data to the database WEBRIBO (http://webribo.ages.at). We compared DNA fragment patterns to those in the database of the National Microbiology Laboratory, Canada, using BioNumerics software (version 5.1. Applied Maths). We designated the isolate as PCR ribotype 046 and the new pulsotype as 1174 .
We determined the antibiotic susceptibility profile using the E-test (bioMérieux) on Brucella agar supplemented with vitamin K (5 mg ml−1) and 5 % defibrinated sheep blood. The isolate was resistant to levofloxacin (4 µg ml−1) and susceptible to vancomycin (1.5 µg ml−1), metronidazole (0.38 µg ml−1), rifampicin (<0.002 µg ml−1), moxifloxacin (1.0 µg ml−1) and clindamycin (1.0 µg ml−1). Resistance breakpoints were set in agreement with the guidelines of the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) (M11-A8). For levofloxacin, we used the moxifloxacin breakpoint; for vancomycin, we used the EUCAST guidelines (http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/); and for rifampicin, we used the breakpoint given by O'Conner et al. [16].
The diarrhoea ceased on the fourth or fifth day after the initiation of therapy with metronidazole (7.5 mg kg−1 three times a day for 14 days). No probiotic therapy was used.
Discussion
Here, we report a case of a child with a history of hospitalization, antibiotic administration, hepatic transplant and immunosuppressive medication therapy, all of which are risk factors for CDI. A recent study reported that 92 % of children with CDI had a history of previous antibiotic use, 60 % were on immunosuppressive treatment, 39 % had malignancy or underwent organ transplantation and 13 % had inflammatory bowel disease [17].
A retrospective review of institutional databases showed that children undergoing solid organ transplant (SOT) accounted for 20 % of all detected CDIs in immunocompromised paediatric patients in Germany [12]. These data reinforce the importance of inquiry for CDI in children after SOT in developing countries [18, 19].
The isolated 046 ribotype strain was toxigenic (tcdA and tcdB gene fragments of PaLoc were positive), which explains the diarrhoea. PCR ribotype 046 has previously been isolated from neonatal pigs and humans in Sweden, indicating its zoonotic potential [20], and in adult tuberculosis patients in Poland, where a highly rifampicin-resistant PCR ribotype 046 clone was isolated [21]. PCR ribotype 046 has also been described as causing adult CDI in Chile [22]. Despite the fact that this ribotype has been isolated in a healthy child in southeast Brazil [23], ours is the first report of this ribotype causing paediatric diarrhoea.
The isolation and identification of strains has been a crucial practice in hospital services to provide a better understanding of the severity, recurrence and antibiotic resistance of CDIs. Although some studies have shown that ribotype 046 is resistant to antibiotics such as amoxicillin, rifaximin and erythromycin [21, 23], the strain isolated in this study did not show antibiotic resistance, except for levofloxacin. Our patient responded to treatment with metronidazole, which is the first-line agent for initial and first recurrence of mild-to-moderate severity in paediatric patients with CDIs [1]. Most children with CDIs are treated with a single agent, typically metronidazole (53–63 %) [24].
This case shows the importance of considering CDI in children following SOT in developing countries. The case highlights the relevance of strain molecular characterization to understand epidemiological spread as well as clinical features. Because CDI prolongs hospitalization time, increases healthcare costs, and can cause death, vigilance in health care units for CDI in the paediatric population, notably in immunosuppressed children after SOT, should be emphasized.
Funding information
This work was supported by CAPES and PRONEX/FUNCAP/CNPq of Brazil through grants: PR2-0101-00060.01.00/15, and Vicerrectoría de Investigación and Acción Social of the University of Costa Rica.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr George Golding and Tim Du (NML, Canada) for allowing access to the PFGE database. We express our gratitude to Pablo Vargas (UCR) and Olavo Moraes (UFC) for their technical assistance.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical statement
Written consent was obtained from the patient’s family for this publication.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: CCFA, cefoxitin-–cycloserine-–fructose agar; CDI, Clostridioides difficile infection; cdtB, binary toxin; FAB, fastidious anaerobe broth; SOT, solid organ transplant; tcdA, toxin A; tcdB, toxin B; tcdC, negative regulator of the toxin genes.
References
- 1.Zilberberg MD, Tillotson GS, McDonald LC. Clostridium difficile Infections among United States, 1997-2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:604–609. doi: 10.3201/eid1604.090680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nasiri MJ, Goudarzi M, Hajikhani B, Ghazi M, Goudarzi H, et al. Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalized patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaerobe. 2018;50:32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Noor A, Krilov LR. Clostridium difficile infection in children. Pediatr Ann. 2018;47:359–365. doi: 10.3928/19382359-20180803-01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Deshpande A, Pant C, Anderson MP, Donskey CJ, Sferra TJ. Clostridium difficile infection in the hospitalized pediatric population increasing trend in disease incidence. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32:1138–1140. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182948518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Clayton JA, Toltzis P. Recent issues in pediatric Clostridium difficile infection. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2017;19:49. doi: 10.1007/s11908-017-0603-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lo Vecchio A, Lancella L, Tagliabue C, De Giacomo C, Garazzino S, et al. Clostridium difficile infection in children: Epidemiology and risk of recurrence in a low-prevalence country. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36:177–185. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2793-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Borali E, De Giacomo C. Clostridium difficile infection in children: a review. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;63:130–140. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Eze P, Balsells E, Kyaw MH, Nair H. Risk factors for Clostridium difficile infections - An overview of the evidence base and challenges in data synthesis. J Glob Health. 2017;7:1–9. doi: 10.7189/jogh.07.010417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Trifan A, Stanciu C, Girleanu I, Stoica OC, Singeap AM, et al. Proton pump inhibitors therapy and risk of Clostridium difficile infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:6500–6515. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mittal C, Hassan S, Arshad S, Jeepalyam S, Bruni S, et al. Clostridium difficile infection in liver transplant recipients: A retrospective study of rates, risk factors and outcomes. Am J Transplant. 2014;14:1901–1907. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Castagnola E, Battaglia T, Bandettini R, Caviglia I, Baldelli I, et al. Clostridium difficile-associated disease in children with solid tumors. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17:321–324. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0507-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Breuer C, Döring S, Rohde H, Rutkowski S, Müller I, et al. Clostridium difficile infection after pediatric solid organ transplantation: a practical single-center experience. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019;334:1269–1275. doi: 10.1007/s00467-019-04219-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Costa CL, BarretoMano de Carvalho CCB, CarvalhoGonzález RH, Gifoni MAC, Ribeiro R de A, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in a Brazilian cancer hospital. Anaerobe. 2017;48:232–236. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Quesada-Gómez C, Rodríguez C, Gamboa-Coronado M del M, Rodríguez-Cavallini E, Du T, et al. Emergence of Clostridium difficile NAP1 in Latin America. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:669–670. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02196-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bidet P, Barbut F, Lalande V, Burghoffer B, Petit JC. Development of a new PCR-ribotyping method for Clostridium difficile based on ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;261–6 doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13629.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.O’Connor JR, Galang MA, Sambol SP, Hecht DW, Vedantam G, et al. Rifampin and rifaximin resistance in clinical isolates of Clostridium difficile. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:2813–2817. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00342-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.El Feghaly RE, Stauber JL, Tarr PI, Haslam DB. Viral co-infections are common and are associated with higher bacterial burden in children with Clostridium difficile infection. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57:813–816. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3182a3202f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Alonso CD, Kamboj M. Clostridium difficile Infection (CDI) in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2014;16:414. doi: 10.1007/s11908-014-0414-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cusini A, Béguelin C, Stampf S, Boggian K, Garzoni C, et al. Clostridium difficile infection is associated with graft loss in solid organ transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2018;18:1745–1754. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Norén T, Johansson K, Unemo M. Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 046 is common among neonatal pigs and humans in Sweden. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:O2–6. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Obuch-Woszczatyński P, Dubiel G, Harmanus C, Kuijper E, Duda U, et al. Emergence of Clostridium difficile infection in tuberculosis patients due to a highly rifampicin-resistant PCR ribotype 046 clone in Poland. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32:1027–1030. doi: 10.1007/s10096-013-1845-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Plaza-Garrido Á, Barra-Carrasco J, Macias JH, Carman R, Fawley WN, et al. Predominance of Clostridium difficile ribotypes 012, 027 and 046 in a university hospital in Chile, 2012. Epidemiol Infect. 2016;144:976–979. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815002459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alcides APP, Brazier JS, Pinto LJF, Balassiano IT, Boente RF, et al. New PCR ribotypes of Clostridium difficile detected in children in Brazil: prevalent types of Clostridium difficile in Brazil. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2007;92:53–59. doi: 10.1007/s10482-006-9134-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shim JO. Clostridium difficile in children: To treat or not to treat? Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2014;17:80–84. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2014.17.2.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
