Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2021 Nov 17;5(11):3057–3067. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2021.08.007

Large magnon-induced anomalous Nernst conductivity in single-crystal MnBi

Bin He 1,2,9,, Cüneyt Şahin 3,4, Stephen R Boona 5, Brian C Sales 6, Yu Pan 1, Claudia Felser 1, Michael E Flatté 3,4, Joseph P Heremans 2,7,8
PMCID: PMC8604385  PMID: 34841198

Summary

Thermoelectric modules are a promising approach to energy harvesting and efficient cooling. In addition to the longitudinal Seebeck effect, transverse devices utilizing the anomalous Nernst effect (ANE) have recently attracted interest. For high conversion efficiency, it is required that the material have a large ANE thermoelectric power and low electrical resistance, which lead to the conductivity of the ANE. ANE is usually explained in terms of intrinsic contributions from Berry curvature. Our observations suggest that extrinsic contributions also matter. Studying single-crystal manganese-bismuth (MnBi), we find a high ANE thermopower (∼10 μV/K) under 0.6 T at 80 K, and a transverse thermoelectric conductivity of over 40 A/Km. With insight from theoretical calculations, we attribute this large ANE predominantly to a new advective magnon contribution arising from magnon-electron spin-angular momentum transfer. We propose that introducing a large spin-orbit coupling into ferromagnetic materials may enhance the ANE through the extrinsic contribution of magnons.

Keywords: thermoelectricity, anomalous Nernst effect, magnons, ferromagnetic bismuthide

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • MnBi shows a remarkable anomalous Nernst thermopower of 10 μV/K at 80 K

  • Anomalous Nernst conductivity reaches 40 A/Km, the highest value reported

  • Magnon-electron drag is likely the source of the large anomalous Nernst effect

Context & scale

Thermoelectricity offers the prospect of generating electric power from heat and controlling temperatures in a directed manner. The oldest thermoelectric devices, dating to the 1800s, were based on Seebeck’s observation of electric fields forming in the direction of a temperature gradient. More recent devices have been based on the transverse thermoelectric effect, in which the voltage and thermal gradients are perpendicular. In the anomalous Nernst effect, a magnetic field normal to a thermal gradient produces a voltage drop transverse to both. This Hall-like effect is poorly understood but has great potential for applications in thermoelectric energy harvesting and cooling. We demonstrate a startlingly large transverse thermoelectric response in MnBi crystals, which traditional approaches cannot fully explain. We believe that it is due to interactions between magnons and electrons. This mechanism may operate in other materials, allowing major advances in thermoelectrics.


Transverse thermoelectrics utilizing the anomalous Nernst effect (ANE) can be a novel approach to energy sustainability. We investigate the thermoelectric transport properties in ferromagnetic MnBi and observe one of the largest ANEs ever reported. We attribute this giant ANE to the coexistence of ferromagnetism and the heavy Bi atom. Our discovery proposes an alternative recipe to generate large ANE, which introduce a large spin-orbit coupling to ferromagnetic systems.

Introduction

With its ability to convert heat directly into electricity and vice versa, thermoelectricity plays a significant role in energy harvesting as well as static cooling applications.1, 2, 3, 4 Since over 90% of the energy humanity uses today comes from thermal processes, even a very slight improvement in efficiency translates into a large amount of energy saved, for example, by recovering the heat wasted in the exhaust of internal-combustion engines. To date, most thermoelectric research has focused on the longitudinal Seebeck effect, in which the temperature gradient is parallel to the voltage generated. In this case, the thermopiles have to be connected in series to generate a high voltage. This requires that electrical contacts be made at the hot side of each of the n- and p-type elements of each couple, a task that requires the development of a contact technology that minimizes thermal diffusion of the contact material into the thermoelectric. The need for individual contacts to each thermocouple elements and the fact that all these contacts are connected in series in the assembled module results in irreversible efficiency loss in contact resistance. Transverse thermoelectric devices, in which the voltage generated is perpendicular to the applied temperature gradient, can avoid these disadvantages. This configuration vastly simplifies the fabrication procedure by making it possible to apply the electrical contact only to a colder side of the thermoelectric material. It also reduces the thermal resistance, where a designated voltage can be generated by simply making the device longer or thicker. The low contact resistance losses of transverse devices compared with Peltier coolers is also an asset on cooling applications. With increasing demand for microdevice cooling, it is essential to achieve large transverse thermoelectric response and reveal the mechanisms to maximize the thermoelectric power output.

Transverse thermoelectrics utilizing the anomalous Nernst effect (ANE) have attracted much attention in recent years.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 In ANE, the thermoelectric voltage, applied temperature gradient, and external field are perpendicular to each other, making it promising for transverse thermoelectric applications. ANE can be viewed as the thermal analog to the anomalous Hall effect (AHE) in magnetic materials. Like the AHE signals, the ANE signal reaches its largest value at the saturation magnetization. ANE has been observed in many magnetic materials, particularly ferromagnets.5, 6, 7, 8,11 With recent progress in understanding the topology of magnetic materials, it is believed that the net Berry curvature is the origin of intrinsic ANE.5,6,10,12 A further approach to enhancing the ANE thermopower is to utilize extrinsic, e.g., magnon contributions.13 One well-established magnon-mediated transport phenomenon is the spin Seebeck effect (SSE),14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 observed in heterostructure thin film devices. In the SSE, a spin current is thermally excited in a ferromagnetic insulator and injected into a detection layer (Pt) with large spin-orbit coupling (SOC), where a transverse voltage is detected via the inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE).20,21 Inspired by the SSE, we expect a magnonic contribution to the total ANE thermopower when introducing large SOC into magnetic materials, since the SSE and ANE share the identical geometry.

To observe a magnon-induced ANE, a large SOC is always required. We decided to focus on magnets with bismuth (Bi), the heaviest stable element with the largest SOC.22 However, Bi-based ferromagnets have always been rare: Bi has difficulty reacting with 3d metals. To date, MnBi is the only know binary ferromagnetic bismuthide with a high Curie temperature (∼630 K),23 making it potentially a high-temperature permanent magnet. Historically the transport properties of MnBi were long uninvestigated due to the lack of single crystals.24,25 In 2014, McGuire et al. published a study of single-crystal MnBi that detailed their successful single-crystal growth using the flux method.26 Combining large SOC and ferromagnetism, single-crystal MnBi is an ideal system to investigate the magnon-induced advective contributions to ANE.

Here, we present our thermomagnetic measurements and the observation of a large ANE signal on two batches of MnBi single crystals, batch-1 (B1) and batch-2 (B2). For each batch, we examine two pieces of crystals for both the in-plane (//) and cross-plane (⊥) properties. We find a large ANE that reaches 10 μV/K at 0.6 T and 80 K. Moreover, the anomalous Nernst conductivity reaches over 40 A/Km (higher than any reported value), as a result of low resistivity and large ANE thermopower. By carefully comparing the experimental data with the tight-binding calculations, we confirm that the intrinsic ANE mechanism is not sufficient to explain the observation. We posit that the large ANE may arise from an additional advective transport process induced by magnons: the thermally driven magnon current may spin-polarize the conduction electrons dynamically, resulting in an additional transverse voltage due to large SOC in MnBi.

Results

A scenario of how magnon-electron interactions can contribute to a large ANE is schematically shown in Figure 1A. When a temperature gradient is applied to a ferromagnetic material, magnons are excited and can interact with electrons in multiple ways further affecting the thermoelectric transport behavior. In the zero-field case, the magnons can transfer their linear momenta (p) to the electrons and generate an advective contribution to the Seebeck coefficient, known as magnon-drag thermopower (SMD).27 In the presence of a magnetic field, magnon spin flux can transfer spin-angular momenta (S) to the itinerant electrons during magnon-electron scattering in the bulk of the FM itself, thereby dynamically spin-polarizing the itinerant electrons beyond what is expected from the thermodynamic equilibrium band structure. This corresponds to spin pumping across an interface in the SSE, except that here the spin pumping occurs in the bulk during scattering processes. This electron polarization then can generate a transverse electric field by ISHE: EISHE=DISHE(JS×σ), where DISHE stands for ISHE efficiency and is determined by the intensity of the SOC. Overall, this additional contribution to the ANE could be labeled a self-SSE term. Since Bi is known to exhibit very large SOC,22 MnBi should have a large DISHE, giving rise to a potentially large extrinsic contribution to the ANE.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Overview of the experiment and longitudinal transport properties

(A) Schematic drawing of the magnon-induced advective transport. When a temperature gradient is applied to a ferromagnet, it is transferred from the phonon system to the magnon system. The magnons can then carry linear momentum (p) and spin angular momentum (S). Transfer of (p) generates the magnon-drag thermopower SMD. In a material with large SOC, transfer of S creates an out-of-equilibrium additional spin polarization of the conduction electrons that can generate a transverse thermoelectric voltage via the inverse spin Hall effect; this contributes to the ANE.

(B) Crystal structure of MnBi, with the preferential spin orientation labeled in red arrow. From 90 to 140 K, the spins reorient from ab-plane to c axis.

(C) Resistivity of four crystals B1// – B2 measured from 80 to 300 K, with B1 and B2 stand for batch-1 and batch-2 crystals. The sample-to-sample variation in resistivity is possibly from different carrier concentration.

(D) Seebeck coefficient of four samples B1// – B2. In-plane thermopowers have a positive temperature dependence, whereas the cross-plane thermopowers show a negative temperature dependence, which we speculate is related to the SMD. Again, due to different carrier density, B1 samples have higher thermopower than B2 samples.

Figure 1B shows the crystal structure and the spin reorientation (SR) process of MnBi, with Mn as the smaller green sphere and Bi as the larger purple sphere. It crystalizes in hexagonal NiAs structure. The magnetic structure of MnBi is complicated because of its SR process.26 Below 90 K, the spins are aligned in the a-b plane; above it, they start to rotate toward the c axis. By 140 K, SR is completed. Because it can change the normal modes of the magnons, SR has a significant influence on the ANE in MnBi

The resistivities of our four crystals increase with temperature, showing a metallic behavior (Figure 1C). A slight difference in resistivity has been observed from batch to batch, a result of different carrier concentrations induced by the different starting composition for the flux method (see section S1 for details). Such differences have also been observed in the Seebeck coefficients. Figure 1D shows the Seebeck coefficient of the four crystals. The in-plane Seebeck coefficients (B1// and B2//) increase as temperature goes up, while the cross-plane thermopowers (B1 and B2) show the opposite trend. The latter behavior is unusual for a metal, and a tentative explanation is presented along with the Nernst discussion. The measurements on the two pairs of freshly prepared samples (B1// and B2//) and (B1 and B2) indicate good sample-to-sample reproducibility. Meanwhile, thermopowers of B2 crystals are slightly lower than those of the B1, because of slightly higher carrier concentration. Lastly, it should be mentioned that the samples are air sensitive; the thermoelectric transport properties, for instance—the Seebeck coefficient and ANE thermopower—degrade with repeated thermal cycling as described in the supplemental information (Figures S3 and S4).

Large ANE signals were observed in both batches of crystals. Figures 2A and 2B show the cross-plane ANE thermopower, Szyx, measured on the samples B1 and B2. The largest Szyx is observed on B1 at 80 K, reaching 10 μV/K at 0.6 T. Noting the complex magnetization process at low temperature, the magnetization curve is carefully analyzed, and the saturation field is confirmed to be 0.6 T at 80 K by the M–H curve (Figures S2A and S2B). Such a large ANE thermopower is higher than most reported values5, 6, 7, 8, 9,11 and is only second to a recently reported compound, UCo0.8Ru0.2Al.28 The Szyx of B2 reaches ∼7 μV/K at 110 K, comparable with that of B1 in the same temperature range. For B1, the Szyx can reach saturation at 1 T from 80 to 140 K. When the SR process is completed, our crystals do not reach saturation magnetization at 1.4 T; thus no saturation in Szyx is observed on B1 from 180 to 300 K. At room temperature, our measured ANE thermopower is 2.5 μV/K for B1 and 1.5 μV/K for B2. Figures 2C and 2D show the in-plane ANE thermopower Syxz, measured on B1// and B2//. For both samples, a clear saturation field of 0.8 T is observed above 140 K. The largest Syxz values of both crystals are around 2 μV/K at 300 K. A nonlinear ANE signal is observed below 140 K on B2//, which possibly originates from a complex magnetic structure induced by the SR process.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Field-dependent anomalous Nernst thermopower of MnBi along different directions

(A–D) Cross-plane ANE Szyx on samples (A) B1 and (B) B2, with applied field parallel to a axis, and in-plane ANE Sxyz on samples (C) B1// and (D) B2//, with applied field parallel to c axis. Measurements were taken down to the 90 K for B2//, below which the magnet anisotropy teared apart the sample. On sample B2, due to the small size of the crystal (∼ 1.2 mm), we were able to create measurable temperature gradient at 110 K. For Sxyz, the average temperature rise is ∼ 7 K with the sink temperature at 110 K. At 100 K, the average temperature rise is over 10 K when a stable measurable temperature gradient is created. For this reason, the thermoelectric transport measurements are terminated at 110 K for B2. For the longer B1, we were able to measure down to 80 K without overheating the sample. The complete field-dependent Nernst thermopower is shown in Figure S6, from which a clear sign change of the ordinary Nernst signal is observed.

Since the origins of intrinsic AHE and ANE are often related to each other, we examined the AHE signals of all four crystals in addition to the ANE. Figures 3A and 3B show the cross-plane AHE resistivities ρzyx on B1 and B2 at various temperatures. Clear AHE signals have been observed on both samples. The AHE signal of B1 is larger than the signal of B2, which is possibly due to different carrier concentrations and scattering effects. Figures 3C and 3D show the in-plane AHE resistivities ρyxz on B1// and B2//. Clear AHE signals are observed above 180 K on both samples, with a clear nonlinear ρyxz on B2// during the SR.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Anomalous hall effect in MnBi

(A–D) Cross-plane anomalous Hall resistivities of two cross-plane samples measured on (A) B1 and (B) B2, with the field applied along a axis, and in-plane AHE resistivities measured on samples (C) B1// and (D) B2//, with applied field parallel to c axis. Nonlinear signals are detected on the field sweep measurement of B2 sample, possibly because of complex magnetic structure induced by spin reorientation and a weak first-order phase transition. We show the complete Hall curves in the supplemental information (Figure S7), from which the ordinary Hall signal is resolved.

Currently, the net Berry curvature is considered to be the intrinsic mechanism of anomalous transverse transport properties, with skew scattering and side jump as the extrinsic mechanisms of AHE.29 The net Berry curvature is considered to dominate the good metal region (104 ∼ 106 S/cm), while the extrinsic skew scattering dominates the high conductivity region (>106 S/cm) and side jump dominates the bad metal region (<104 S/cm). Since the resistivity of MnBi falls in the good metal region, the Berry curvature should dominate the signals in AHE. Experimentally, we observed a nonlinear Hall behavior below 0.3 T in AHE resistivities of the B2 samples (Figures 3B and 3D), which is because of the complex magnetic structure arising from the SR. Additionally, a weak first-order phase transition26 would also affect the magnetic structure. A detailed study of the nonlinear Hall effect is beyond the scope of this paper, but it can be achieved in the future.

In contrast with the AHE signals, the nonlinear ANE signals is only observed on the in-plane measurement (Figure 2D), but not on the cross-plane (Figure 2B). We believe that the nonlinear signals observed in both in-plane AHE (Figure 3D) and ANE (Figure 2D) share the same origin: the Berry curvature shifting during SR. However, for the cross-plane measurements, the nonlinearity is only found on AHE (Figure 3B), but not on ANE (Figure 2B), we therefore speculate that the net Berry curvature is not the dominant mechanism for the ANE. An extrinsic mechanism with a large transverse signal is participating in the ANE. Extrinsic contributions to Nernst effect can arise from interactions between charge carriers and quasiparticles, including magnon drag,30 paramagnon drag,31, 32, 33 and phonon drag.34 Since magnons have been experimentally detected in MnBi single crystals,35 we propose they are playing a significant role in thermomagnetic transport.

Discussion

When the charge carriers are in thermodynamic equilibrium (i.e., in the absence of advective transport processes, such as drag), the ANE is related to the energy derivative of the AHE via the Mott relation in metals and degenerately doped semiconductors.36 However, the Mott relation breaks down in the presence of drag contributions because it assumes an electron energy distribution that follows equilibrium Fermi-Dirac statistics.36,37 Under drag conditions, the electron population, taken in isolation, is not at equilibrium. Since the Mott relation permits the calculation of an intrinsic contribution to the ANE that has the same origin as that of the AHE, we first derive the tensor elements of the experimental thermoelectric conductivity tensor α at various temperatures. This tensor α is related to the thermopower tensor S and the conductivity tensor σ, and in particular, the anomalous Nernst conductivity αxy=Sxxσyx+Sxyσxx.

Figure 4A shows the temperature dependent ANE thermopowers from 80 to 300 K. The in-plane ANE thermopower (Syxz) of both batches increased with temperature, whereas the cross-plane ANE thermopower (Szyx) decreased monotonically with temperature, from a maximum of 10 μV/K at 80 K to about 2 μV/K at room temperature. Figure 4B shows the anomalous Hall conductivities (AHCs) on B1 and B1//. (Note that we are particularly interested in B1 because of the larger ANE signals.) The cross-plane AHC is approximately 800 S/cm below 140 K, while above 140 K it decreases with temperature because of non-saturation behavior. The in-plane AHC increases with temperature, reaching ∼ 200 S/cm at 300 K. The AHCs in both directions fall in the intrinsic region of the AHE, which is consistent with the analysis on the longitudinal electrical conductivity.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Giant transverse thermoelectric conductivity in MnBi single crystal

(A) Temperature dependence of anomalous Nernst thermopower. For in-plane direction, data are taken at 0.8 T. For cross-plane direction, data are taken at saturation field below 140 K, and 1 T above 140 K.

(B) Anomalous Hall conductivity calculated with measured longitudinal and transverse resistivities. Points are calculated σAHE; curves are a guide to the eye.

(C) Theoretical and experimental transverse thermoelectric linear response tensor element αyz and αxy, comparing with tight-binding calculated by the tight-binding Hamiltonian.

(D) Comparison of the experimental αyz and Syz with other magnetic materials. The giant αyz is a result of low resistivity and large anomalous Nernst thermopower. The anomalous Nernst conductivity of MnBi is outstanding compared with other magnetic materials because of the magnon-mediated transport signature. The dashed lines are a guide to the eye.

With the acquired AHCs, we calculated the in-plane and cross-plane thermoelectric linear response tensor elements (α// and α), and compared them with tight-binding results for B1 in Figure 4C. Experimentally, α decreased with temperature, with the largest value of ∼44 A/Km at 80 K. Such a large transverse thermoelectric conductivity is an order of magnitude higher than known ferromagnets and antiferromagnets.5, 6, 7, 8 In theory, both the intrinsic α// and α should increase with temperature (shown in the embedded figure), and have the absolute values between 0 and 1 A/Km, much smaller than the experimental results. In addition, we examined the α with the Fermi energy shifting from −5 to 5 eV, however, the absolute value of α never exceeds 1 A/Km (Figure S5). Thus, the intrinsic contribution does not by itself explain the behavior of the α sufficiently; magnon-mediated transport can cause a much larger transverse thermoelectric response. In a magnon-mediated transport process, large ANE thermopower and longitudinal conductivity are able to coexist because magnons are Bosons, and they are not subjected to the Fermi-Dirac distribution. The large ANE is related to the magnon population and magnon-electron interaction, not to the electronic band structure. With a large ANE thermopower and a low resistivity, we achieve a giant αANE. The observed temperature dependence gives further evidence for this interpretation. At low temperature, the local spins are aligned in the ab-plane, and ΔT is applied along the c axis. The temperature gradient can excite the magnons and give rise to the self-SSE after the domains are aligned by an external field. In this case, self-SSE can be the origin of the giant Nernst thermopower in B1. Between 90 and 140 K, the local spins start to rotate from ab-plane to c axis, and the magnon dispersion relation also begin to change. The spin orientation reduces the total number of magnons excited by the temperature gradient along the c axis direction, so the self-SSE signal should decrease with temperature. We show the temperature normalized ANE thermopower in Figure S8, which is supportive to the proposal of low temperature magnon-drag effect.

This advective picture is also consistent with the fact that the longitudinal cross-plane thermopower decreases with increasing temperature (Figure 1C), assuming a large magnon-drag component. According to a previous study,27 in a simple model the magnon drag thermopower and magnon drag ANE are related to each other by the formula SANE=Cμ0HSmdρ, where C is a material parameter depending on the effective mass and scattering mechanism, μ0H is the applied field, SMD is the magnon-drag thermopower and ρ is the resistivity. Experimentally, both longitudinal and transverse thermopowers decrease with temperature, which agrees qualitatively with the prediction of the formula above. Such a decreasing trend is indicative of the magnon-drag contribution to both longitudinal and transverse thermoelectric response. Lacking the detailed band parameters and scattering parameters, we are unable at this time to further quantify the value of C.

Finally, in Figure 4D we compare our experimental ANE thermopower SANE and transverse thermoelectric conductivity αANE with other magnetic materials with large ANE responses.5, 6, 7, 8, 9,28 MnBi’s SANE is about 25% higher than that of Fe3Ga and Co2MnGa, for both of which the intrinsic contributions are recognized as the origin of the large ANE signal. More importantly, the anomalous Nernst conductivity of MnBi is outstanding among all magnetic materials, reaching over 40 A/Km. Even compared with UCo0.8Ru0.2Al with a larger ANE thermopower, our experimental αANE is still three times higher than that of UCo0.8Ru0.2Al. With the extrinsic magnon-drag contribution, MnBi can have the large ANE thermopower while maintaining a low longitudinal resistivity. Such a large αANE suggests that this magnon-drag-induced spin angular momentum transfer procedure is a highly effective approach to generating a large transverse thermoelectric response, which can be a new strategy for high-performance themoelectric applications.

In summary, MnBi, with a large SOC as well as strong ferromagnetism, is an ideal candidate for studying magnon-mediated transport phenomena, and therefore achieving large transverse thermoelectric response. A large ANE signal of 10 μV/K and a record anomalous Nernst conductivity of over 40 A/Km were observed in single-crystal MnBi at 80 K. This giant transverse thermoelectric response arises from an extrinsic magnon-electron interaction process. The magnon-electron spin angular momentum transfer process significantly enhances the ANE signal, equivalent to a self-SSE. Our study provides a new fundamental understanding of ANE, which can be quite large in ferromagnets with strong spin-orbit interaction. Such utilization of the magnon-electron interactions provides routes for the enhancement of ANE, and will doubtless find applications, as well as be generalized to other topics in the thermoelectrics field.

Experimental procedures

Single crystals of MnBi were grown at Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL) using the method detailed in McGuire et al26; they are called Batch-1 (B1) in this paper. The crystals grown at Max Plank Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids (CPfS) were grown in the same method with a slightly higher starting Mn molar fraction (9%); they are called Batch-2 (B2). Optical image, Laue diffraction result and other details is reported in section S1, Figure S1, and Table S1. MnBi single crystals grow as hexagonal cylinders. We measured the transport properties in a modified Janis liquid nitrogen flow cryostat, as well as a quantum design physical properties measurement system with a breakout box. In both measurement systems, the set-ups were identical as described previously.38 We report our result on B1// and B2// for the in-plane transport properties and B1 and B2 for the cross-plane properties. The temperature dependent magnetization is measured in a quantum design magnetic properties measurement system 3 from 80 to 300 K, up to 5 T.

We use the following notation for the transverse transport properties, which are denoted by indices xyz. Here, x is the direction of the applied thermodynamic flux (charge or heat flux), y is the direction of the measured voltage, and z is the field direction. Thus, Syxz is the in-plane Nernst thermopower with the magnetic field along the z [0001] axis and measured on crystal B1// / B2//, while Szyx is the cross-plane Nernst thermopower with the field parallel to the a axis [21¯1¯0] in the hexagonal lattice, measured on crystals B1/B2. The sign convention in this experiment is opposite to the Gerlach sign conventions.

We constructed a tight-binding Hamiltonian using the parameters derived from the Density Function Theory.39 MnBi has a point group of D6h and a space group of P63, with a hexagonal crystal structure and 4 atoms per unit cell. The lattice constants were taken as a = b = 4.285 Å and c = 6.113 Å. The tight-binding Hamiltonian consisted of p-orbitals of Bi and d-orbitals of Mn. Magnetism was incorporated into the Hamiltonian through the Stoner formalism with parameters 4.5 and 0.2 eV for d- and p-orbitals, respectively. We also have added the spin-orbit Hamiltonian with spin-orbit couplings of 0.048 and 1.4 eV for Mn and Bi, respectively. The Berry curvature Ωij, which is an intrinsic property of the electronic band structure, was computed from this 16-band tight-binding Hamiltonian by:

Ωij(nk)=Imnn<unk|Hki|unk><unk|Hki|unk>(εnεn)2

For zero magnetization (or no external magnetic field) d-orbitals are located densely around 0 eV energy. As magnetization is increased with applied field, bands that predominantly consist of d-orbitals move away from the center to higher and lower energies. The energy-resolved AHC is calculated by integrating the Berry curvatures

σij=e2dknΩij(nk)fnk

where Ωij is the Berry curvature, and the summation is performed over all occupied bands in the first Brillouin zone. The intrinsic contribution to the anomalous Nernst conductivity (ANC) is related to the sum of the Berry curvatures and can be calculated by the well-established relation40:

αij=1edεf(ε)μσij(ε)εμT

where e is the electric charge, f is the Fermi-Dirac distribution, T is the temperature, σ denotes the energy-resolved intrinsic AHC, and μ is the chemical potential.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and materials should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Bin He (bin.he@cpfs.mpg.de).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique materials.

Acknowledgments

B.H. and J.P.H. acknowledge support from the Center for Emerging Materials, an NSF MRSEC grant (DMR-2011876). B.H., Y.P., and C.F. acknowledge support from ERC TOPMAT, the European Union (grant no. 742068), and European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant no. 766566). C.Ş. and M.E.F. acknowledge support from the Center for Emergent Materials, an NSF MRSEC under award no. DMR-1420451. B.C.S. acknowledge support from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, B.H., S.R.B., and J.P.H.; experiments, B.H., S.R.B., B.C.S., and Y.P; calculations, C.Ş. and M.E.F.; analysis and discussion, B.H., C.Ş., S.R.B., Y.P., C.F., M.E.F., and J.P.H.; writing and revision, B.H., C.Ş., S.R.B., B.C.S., Y.P., C.F., M.E.F., and J.P.H.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Published: September 14, 2021

Footnotes

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.08.007.

Supplemental information

Document S1. Supplemental experimental procedures, Figures S1–S8, and Table S1
mmc1.pdf (656.3KB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supplemental information
mmc2.pdf (3.3MB, pdf)

Data and code availability

All data from this study are available from the lead contact upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Goldsmid H.J. Springer; 2010. Introduction to Thermoelectricity. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bell L.E. Cooling, heating, generating power, and recovering waste heat with thermoelectric systems. Science. 2008;321:1457–1461. doi: 10.1126/science.1158899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Snyder G.J., Toberer E.S. Complex thermoelectric materials. Nat. Mater. 2008;7:105–114. doi: 10.1038/nmat2090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Heremans J.P., Dresselhaus M.S., Bell L.E., Morelli D.T. When thermoelectrics reached the nanoscale. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013;8:471–473. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2013.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sakai A., Minami S., Koretsune T., Chen T., Higo T., Wang Y., Nomoto T., Hirayama M., Miwa S., Nishio-Hamane D., et al. Iron-based binary ferromagnets for transverse thermoelectric conversion. Nature. 2020;581:53–57. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2230-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sakai A., Mizuta Y.P., Nugroho A.A., Sihombing R., Koretsune T., Suzuki M.-T., Takemore N., Ishii I., Nishio-Hamane D., Arita R., et al. Giant anomalous Nernst effect and quantum critical scaling in a ferromagnetic semimetal. Nature Phys. 2018;14:1119–1124. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guin S.N., Vir P., Zhang Y., Kumar N., Watzman S.J., Fu C., Liu E., Manna K., Schnelle W., Gooth J., et al. Zero-field Nernst effect in a ferromagnetic Kagome-lattice Weyl-semimetal Co3Sn2S2. Adv. Mater. 2019;31:186022. doi: 10.1002/adma.201806622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Guin S.N., Manna K., Noky J., Watzman S.J., Fu C., Kumar N., Schnelle W., Shekhar C., Sun Y., Gooth J., Felser C. Anomalous Nernst effect beyond the magnetization scaling relation in the ferromagnetic Heusler compound CO2MnGa. NPG Asia Mater. 2019;11:16. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ikhlas M., Tomita T., Koretsune T., Suzuki M.-T., Nishio-Hamane D., Arita R., Otani Y., Nakatsuji S. Large anomalous Nernst effect at room temperature in a chiral antiferromagnet. Nature Phys. 2017;13:1085–1090. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liang T., Lin J., Gibson Q., Gao T., Hirschberger M., Liu M., Cava R.J., Ong N.P. Anomalous Nernst effect in the Dirac semimetal Cd3As2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017;118:136601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.136601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ramos R., Aguirre M.H., Anadón A., Blasco J., Lucas I., Uchida K., Algarabel P.A., Morellón L., Saitoh E., Ibarra M.R. Anomalous Nernst effect of Fe3O4 single crystal. Phys. Rev. B. 2014;90 [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sykora S., Caglieris F., Wuttke C., Büchner B., Hess C. Anomalous Nernst effect in Weyl semimetals TaP and TaAs. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;98:201107. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Papaj M., Fu L. Enhanced anomalous Nernst effect in disordered Dirac and Weyl materials. Phys. Rev. B. 2021;103 [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Uchida K., Takahashi S., Harii K., Ieda J., Koshibae W., Ando K., Maekawa S., Saitoh E. Observation of the spin Seebeck effect. Nature. 2008;455:778–781. doi: 10.1038/nature07321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Uchida K., Xiao J., Adachi H., Ohe J., Takahashi S., Ieda J., Ota T., Kajiwara Y., Umezawa H., Kawai H., et al. Spin Seebeck insulator. Nat. Mater. 2010;9:894–897. doi: 10.1038/nmat2856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jaworski C.M., Myers R.C., Johnston-Halperin E., Heremans J.P. Giant spin Seebeck effect in a non-magnetic material. Nature. 2012;487:210–213. doi: 10.1038/nature11221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Uchida K., Adachi H., An T., Ota T., Toda M., Hillebrands B., Maekawa S., Saitoh E. Long-range spin Seebeck effect and acoustic spin pumping. Nat. Mater. 2011;10:737–741. doi: 10.1038/nmat3099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jaworski C.M., Yang J., Mack S., Awschalom D.D., Myers R.C., Heremans J.P. Spin-Seebeck effect: a phonon driven spin distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011;106:186601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.186601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jaworski C.M., Yang J., Mack S., Awschalom D.D., Heremans J.P., Myers R.C. Observation of the spin-Seebeck effect in a ferromagnetic semiconductor. Nat. Mater. 2010;9:898–903. doi: 10.1038/nmat2860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bauer G.E.W., Saitoh E., van Wees B.J. Spin caloritronics. Nat. Mater. 2012;11:391–399. doi: 10.1038/nmat3301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Boona S.R., Myers R.C., Heremans J.P. Spin caloritronics. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014;7:885–910. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Heremans J.P., Cava R.J., Samarth N. Tetradymites as thermoelectrics and topological insulators. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017;2:17049. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Adams E., Hubbard W.M., Syeles A.M. A new permanent magnet from powdered manganese bismuthide. J. Appl. Phys. 1952;23:1207–1211. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Poudyal N., Ping Liu J.P. Advances in nanostructured permanent magnets research. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2013;46 [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Williams H.J., Sherwood R.C., Boothby O.L. Magnetostriction and magnetic anisotropy of MnBi. J. Appl. Phys. 1957;28:445–447. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McGuire M.A., Cao H., Chakoumakos B.C., Sales B.C. Symmetry-lowering lattice distortion at the spin reorientation in MnBi single crystals. Phys. Rev. B. 2014;90:174425. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Watzman S.J., Duine R.A., Tserkovnyak Y., Boona S.R., Jin H., Prakash A., Zheng Y., Heremans J.P. Magnon-drag thermopower and Nernst coefficient in Fe, Co, and Ni. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;94:14. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Asaba T., Ivanov V., Thomas S.M., Savrasov S.Y., Thompson J.D., Bauer E.D., Ronning F. Colossal anomalous Nernst effect in a correlated noncentrosymmetric kagome ferromagnet. Sci. Adv. 2021;7 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nagaosa N., Sinova J., Onoda S., MacDonald A.H., Ong N.P. Anomalous Hall effect. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2010;82:1539–1592. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Blatt F.J., Flood D.J., Rowe V., Schroeder P.A., Cox J.E. Magnon-drag thermopower in iron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1967;18:395–396. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zheng Y., Lu T., Polash M.M.H., Rasoulianboroujeni M., Liu N., Manley M.E., Deng Y., Sun P.J., Chen X.L., Hermann R.P., Zhao H. Paramagnon drag in high thermoelectric figure of merit Li-doped MnTe. Sci. Adv. 2019;5 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat9461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ahmed F., Tsujii N., Mori T. Thermoelectric properties of CuGa1−xMnxTe2: power factor enhancement by incorporation of magnetic ions. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2017;5:7545–7554. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vaney J.-B., Aminorroaya Yamini S., Takaki H., Kobayashi K., Kobayashi N., Mori T. Magnetism-mediated thermoelectric performance of the Cr-doped bismuth telluride tetradymite. Mater. Today Phys. 2019;9:100090. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ziman J.M. Clarendon Press; 1960. Electrons and Phonons. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Williams T.J., Taylor A.E., Christianson A.D., Hahn S.E., Fishman R.S., Parker D.S., McGuire M.A., Sales B.C., Lumsden M.D. Extended magnetic exchange interactions in the high-temperature ferromagnet MnBi. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016;108:192403. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cutler M., Mott N.F. Observation of Anderson localization in an electron gas. Phys. Rev. 1969;181:1336–1340. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Heremans J.P. Thermal spin transport and spin in thermoelectrics. arXiv. 2020 arXiv:2001.06366. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Heremans J.P., Thrush C.M., Morelli D.T. Thermopower enhancement in lead telluride nanostructures. Phys. Rev. B. 2004;70:115334. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shanavas K.V., Parker D., Singh D.J. Theoretical study on the role of dynamics on the unusual magnetic properties in MnBi. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:7222. doi: 10.1038/srep07222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Xiao D., Yao Y., Fang Z., Niu Q. Berry-phase effect in anomalous thermoelectric transport. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006;97 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.026603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Supplemental experimental procedures, Figures S1–S8, and Table S1
mmc1.pdf (656.3KB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supplemental information
mmc2.pdf (3.3MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

All data from this study are available from the lead contact upon reasonable request.

RESOURCES