Skip to main content
Gut Microbes logoLink to Gut Microbes
. 2021 Nov 18;13(1):1988390. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1988390

Yersinia pseudotuberculosis YopE prevents uptake by M cells and instigates M cell extrusion in human ileal enteroid-derived monolayers

Alyssa C Fasciano a, Gaya S Dasanayake b, Mary K Estes c, Nicholas C Zachos d, David T Breault e, Ralph R Isberg a,b, Shumin Tan b, Joan Mecsas a,b,
PMCID: PMC8604394  PMID: 34793276

ABSTRACT

Many pathogens use M cells to access the underlying Peyer’s patches and spread to systemic sites via the lymph as demonstrated by ligated loop murine intestinal models. However, the study of interactions between M cells and microbial pathogens has stalled due to the lack of cell culture systems. To overcome this obstacle, we use human ileal enteroid-derived monolayers containing five intestinal cell types including M cells to study the interactions between the enteric pathogen, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (Yptb), and M cells. The Yptb type three secretion system (T3SS) effector Yops inhibit host defenses including phagocytosis and are critical for colonization of the intestine and Peyer’s patches. Therefore, it is not understood how Yptb traverses through M cells to breach the epithelium. By growing Yptb under two physiological conditions that mimic the early infectious stage (low T3SS-expression) or host-adapted stage (high T3SS-expression), we found that large numbers of Yptb specifically associated with M cells, recapitulating murine studies. Transcytosis through M cells was significantly higher by Yptb expressing low levels of T3SS, because YopE and YopH prevented Yptb uptake. YopE also caused M cells to extrude from the epithelium without inducing cell-death or disrupting monolayer integrity. Sequential infection with early infectious stage Yptb reduced host-adapted Yptb association with M cells. These data underscore the strength of enteroids as a model by discovering that Yops impede M cell function, indicating that early infectious stage Yptb more effectively penetrates M cells while the host may defend against M cell penetration of host-adapted Yptb.

KEYWORDS: M cell, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, human ileal enteroid, polarized epithelial, transcytosis, organoid, cell extrusion, type three secretion system, YopE, YopH

Introduction

Many diverse bacterial and viral pathogens, including enteric Yersinia spp., exploit specialized epithelial microfold (M) cells that reside within the follicular associated epithelium (FAE) above Peyer’s patches (PP) to gain access to deeper tissues.1–3 M cells play a major role in immunosurveillance by taking up and delivering luminal contents to PP and have distinct morphology including apical polarization of β1 integrin and the lack of tightly packed apical microvilli present on neighboring enterocytes.1,4–6 The enteropathogenic bacteria, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis (Yptb) and Y. enterocolitica, are primarily transmitted via ingestion of contaminated food by the fecal-oral route and are psychrotrophs that can grow at temperatures below 4°C.7 Thus, outbreaks have been associated with food stored in the cold such as milk products and vegetables.8–12 After ingestion, Yptb primarily targets to the terminal ileum and gain access to underlying lymph tissues to cause acute intestinal illness and mesenteric lymphadenitis and in rare cases can spread systemically.13 In murine intestinal ligated loop infection models, Yptb has been shown to bind to β1 integrins on M cells using the bacterial adhesin protein invasin.2,14 After breaching the intestinal layer, Yersinia establish infection in PP and form extracellular microcolonies derived from a clonal bacterium.15–18

Critical to Yptb virulence is a type three secretion system (T3SS) encoded on a 70-kb plasmid that functions to inject effector proteins, called Yops, into host cells disrupting antimicrobial functions.19–22 T3SS expression is regulated by temperature and is induced at 37°C,23,24 so Yptb consumed via food in cold-storage conditions may reach the intestine before expressing the T3SS. When Yptb expresses the T3SS, host cell contact, mediated by adhesin proteins invasin and YadA, induces Yop injection directly into the host cell cytoplasm.25,26 YopE, YopH, and YopO contribute to the anti-phagocytic activity of Yptb.27–31 YopE is a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for the Rho family of GTP-binding proteins.28,32 It prevents Yptb internalization by non-polarized epithelial cells via its Rac1-GAP activity and causes cell rounding in non-polarized epithelial cells and limits Yop injection via its RhoA-GAP activity.28,33,34 YopH is a protein tyrosine phosphatase and contributes to inhibiting phagocytosis by immune cells and uptake by epithelial cells.27,35,36 YopO has serine/threonine protein kinase and RhoGDI activities and Y. enterocolitica YopO participates in preventing internalization by macrophages and neutrophils in vitro.37,38

YopE and YopH are required for Yptb survival in intestinal tissues and PP,39,40 yet paradoxically function to prevent internalization raising the conundrum of how Yptb traverses across the FAE containing M cells to establish infection. The attenuation of yopE and yopH mutants in the GI tract39,40 and the sparsity of M cells in the epithelium has made it difficult to study the detailed molecular host-pathogen interactions that occur at the host epithelium using murine models. So whether Yptb Yops are delivered into and/or function within M cells has not been described. Further, widely used in vitro cell culture systems do not mimic the microenvironment and cellular complexity of the human intestine.41 Using human enteroids derived from intestinal biopsies in vitro has helped progress the study of intestinal infections (reviewed in42,43), with a key advantage being the ability of self-renewing Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells to differentiate into four major intestinal cell subpopulations.44,45 While these cultures initially lack M cells, we and others have described a method to induce development of functional M cells in human ileal enteroids by adding RANKL and TNFα to differentiation media.46–49

In the current study, we used human ileal enteroid-derived monolayers containing M cells to reconstruct the cellular microenvironment of the intestine and to visualize how Yptb exploits M cells to gain access to underlying lymph tissues. We find that the consequences of the interaction between M cells and Yptb depend on T3SS status. Yptb lacking T3SS expression more efficiently breached monolayers containing M cells and reduced the association of T3SS-expressing Yptb with M cells in subsequent infection. Conversely, T3SS-expressing Yptb prevented M cell invasion and induced M cell extrusion indicating methods by which infection in PP may be limited. Thus, these studies with enteroids contribute new visual and mechanistic insights into early interactions between Yptb and M cells in the human intestinal epithelium that were previously unattainable in other models.

Materials and methods:

Seeding and differentiation of enteroids as monolayers on transwells

Growth and propagation of enteroids is described in.50 All media compositions can be found in.49 Noggin conditioned media was prepared according to protocols in.51 Enteroids were grown in a tissue culture incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2 for about 1 week in Matrigel (Corning) with the following modifications. Growth media was sometimes used at 75% v/v or 50% v/v Wnt3a conditioned media as needed per cell line to ensure that the stem cells remained in the undifferentiated state. Transwells of 0.4 µm, 1 µm, or 3 µm pore size were seeded and maintained as in.49 To differentiate monolayers on Transwells, growth media was removed from the apical and basolateral chambers after 1–3 days post-seeding, (once monolayers were 80–95% confluent) and was replaced with differentiation media. To induce M cell development, the basolateral chamber differentiation media was supplemented with 200 ng/mL RANKL (Peprotech; cat #: 310–01) and 50 ng/mL TNFα (Peprotech; cat #: 315–01A). The media was replaced every other day and monolayers were used for infection experiments on day 4– 7 post-seeding based on monolayer confluence and increased transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measured with a Millicell ERS-2 Voltohmmeter device.

Bacterial strains and infections

Yptb YPIII strains used for this work are listed in Table S5. The following strains were generated using bacterial conjugation described in.52 To generate ΔyopH and ΔyopO, pCVD442-yopHKO or pCVD442-yopOKO were conjugated into WT YPIII (JM301), respectively. To generate ΔyopEH and ΔyopEO, pCVD442-yopHKO or pCVD442-yopOKO were conjugated into ΔyopE YPIII (WS125c), respectively. Plasmids are described in.39 To generate ΔyadA and Δinv, pCVD442-yadAKO or pCVD442-invKO was conjugated into WT YPIII (JM301), respectively. To generate Δinv/yadA, pCVD442-yadAKO was conjugated into Δinv (ERG9). Plasmids are described in.53

Yptb strains constitutively expressed either green fluorescent protein (GFP) via transformation of the pACYC184-GFP plasmid (chloramphenicol resistant) or the red fluorescent protein, mCherry, via transformation of the pMMB67EH-mCherry plasmid (carbenicillin resistant). Yptb strains were grown in 2xYT broth with appropriate drugs (20 µg/mL chloramphenicol, 100 µg/mL carbenicillin) at 26°C with aeration overnight. In the morning, cultures were diluted at 1:40 in 2xYT with appropriate antibiotics in either a low calcium condition (Figures 1–2) or a high calcium condition, which is a more physiologically relevant condition, for T3SS activity assays (Figures 3–7). Low calcium media contained 2xYT supplemented with 20 mM sodium oxalate and 20 mM MgCl2. High calcium media contained 2xYT supplemented with 5 mM CaCl2. Cultures were grown at 26°C for 2 hours with aeration and were shifted to 37°C for 2 hours with aeration to induce T3SS expression. All mutant strains were shifted to 37°C unless otherwise specified. The bacterial cultures were resuspended in differentiation media at 5 × 106 CFU in 200 µL at 37°C. Transwells were infected apically for 2.5, 3 or 5 hours as indicated, and all experiments took place in a tissue culture incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2. After infection, the media was gently removed from the apical chamber and Transwells were washed 2x with room temperature PBS. Monolayers were fixed with room temperature 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 25 minutes followed by 3 washes with PBS and stored in PBS at 4°C until they were processed for immunofluorescence microscopy.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

WT Yptb binds to enteroid-derived M cells in large numbers. HIE25 ileal monolayers were differentiated under (a-b) RT- or (c-d) RT+ conditions (200 ng/ml RANKL and 50 ng/ml TNFα). Monolayers were infected for 5 hours with 5 × 106 CFU WT YPIII Yptb expressing GFP (green) and stained with anti-GP2 antibody (M cells-red), DAPI (nuclei-blue), and phalloidin (F-actin-cyan). XY planes are maximum intensity projections. White circles/Orange arrows denote a single bacterium. Green arrows denote multiple Yptb. (b, d) Orthogonal XZ and YZ planes are shown. (e) The percentage of Yptb-associated cells per field was plotted according to the number of Yptb (1, 2–5, or 6+) bound to a cell. Each field is 1/320 of a Transwell. (f) The number of Yptb-associated cells per field was plotted according to the number of Yptb (1, 2–5, or 6+) bound to a cell. (e-f) Data were pooled from 3+ independent experiments with 2–4 fields analyzed per Transwell and averaged. Each symbol represents the average from one Transwell. Bars indicate mean and SEM. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison test

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Yptb binds to M cells using invasin. (a-b) Differentiated uninfected HIE25 ileal monolayers (a) RT- or (b) RT+ were stained for apical β1 integrin (red) and DAPI (nuclei-blue). (c) XZ plane of RT+ monolayer shows β1 integrin+ M cell and neighboring non-M cells stained with phalloidin (F-actin-cyan). (d) Fluorescence intensity of F-actin was measured for each M cell and corresponding adjacent non-M cells and divided by cell area. Each point represents an M cell or the average of the corresponding neighboring non-M cells. Bars indicate mean and SD. Data were pooled from 3 images from 3 independent experiments. (e-i) Differentiated HIE25 RT+ monolayers were infected for 5 hours with 5 × 106 CFU (e) WT, (f) ΔyadA, (g) Δinv, or (h) Δinv/yadA YPIII Yptb expressing GFP (green) and stained with anti-β1 integrin antibody (red) and DAPI (nuclei-blue). Magnified insets of an M cell are shown in upper right corner. XY planes are maximum intensity projections. (i) The percentage of Yptb-associated cells per field was plotted according to the number of Yptb (1, 2–5, or 6+) bound to a cell. (j) The number of Yptb-associated cells per field was plotted according to the number of Yptb (1, 2–5, or 6+) bound to a cell. (i-j) Data were pooled from 3+ independent experiments with 2–4 fields analyzed per Transwell and averaged. Each symbol represents the average from one Transwell. Bars indicate mean and SEM. Statistical significance was determined using a two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison test, with comparisons between columns within each row

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Yptb breaches the epithelium in the presence of M cells. (a) Differentiated HIE25 ileal monolayers were RT-, RT+, or RT+ with 100 ng/mL CD137L. Monolayers were infected for 3 hours with 5 × 106 CFU of WT 37°C, ΔyscNU 37°C, or WT 26°C, all expressing GFP, and basolateral media was plated for CFU. Data were pooled from 3+ independent experiments. (b) Differentiated HIE59 ileal monolayers (RT- or RT+) were infected as in (A). Data were pooled from 3+ independent experiments. (a-b) Each point represents one Transwell. Bars indicate geometric mean. Dotted line indicates limit of detection. Open shapes indicate CFU values below limit of detection. Statistics were performed on the log-transformed values with a two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison tests

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

YopE and YopH contribute to inhibition of Yptb internalization by M cells. (a-j) Differentiated HIE25 RT+ ileal monolayers were (a) uninfected or infected for 5 hours with 5 × 106 CFU of (b) WT 37°C, (c) ΔyscNU, (d) WT 26°C, (e) ΔyopO, (f) ΔyopH, (g) ΔyopE, (h) ΔyopE + yopErec, (i) ΔyopEO, and (j) ΔyopEH YPIII Yptb expressing GFP (green). Monolayers were stained with DAPI (nuclei-blue) and phalloidin (F-actin-cyan). (A) was stained with anti-GP2 antibody (M cells-red). Orthogonal XZ planes were analyzed for the presence of Yptb on an M cell surface (0 Yptb internalized-Orange arrows), partially internalized in an M cell (1–9 Yptb internalized-gray arrows), or fully internalized in an M cell (10+ Yptb internalized-blue arrows). (k) Number of Yptb internalized in each M cell was determined and the percentage of cells with the specified number of internalized Yptb per field was plotted. Error bars indicate SEM. Data were pooled from 3+ independent experiments with 2–4 fields analyzed per Transwell and averaged. Statistics were performed using a two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison tests and are shown in Table S1

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Yptb T3SS causes M cell extrusion independent of cell death. (a) Differentiated HIE25 RT+ ileal monolayers were infected for 5 hours with 5 × 106 CFU of WT 37°C, ΔyscNU, or WT 26°C YPIII Yptb expressing GFP. The percentage of extruding infected M cells per field was plotted. Each point represents one Transwell. Bars indicate mean and SEM. Data were pooled from 3+ independent experiments with 2–4 fields analyzed per Transwell and averaged. Statistics were performed with a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison tests. (b) HEp-2 cells were infected for 1 h, 2 h, or 3 h with WT YPIII Yptb expressing YopETEM grown at 37°C or 26°C and were analyzed for % blue cells (TEM-positive). Each point represents an independent experiment. Statistics were performed with a two-way ANOVA on paired data and Sidak’s post hoc multiple comparison tests. (c-f) Differentiated HIE25 RT+ ileal monolayers were (d) uninfected or infected for 5 hours with 5 × 106 CFU (e) WT 37°C, or (f) ΔyscNU YPIII Yptb expressing GFP (green) and stained with Zombie Live/Dead stain (red), DAPI (nuclei-blue), and phalloidin (F-actin-cyan). Orthogonal XZ planes are shown. (c) Sum fluorescence intensity of Zombie. Each point represents a dead extruding cell or an M cell that was uninfected (GP2+) or infected with WT 37°C or ΔyscNU YPIII Yptb expressing GFP. 37 uninfected, 32 WT 37°C-infected, and 27 ΔyscNU-infected M cells were analyzed. Horizontal line indicates limit of detection. Data were pooled from 3 independent experiments. (g-i) Differentiated HIE25 RT+ ileal monolayers were (g) uninfected, (h) treated with 13 µM raptinal, or (i) infected for 5 hours with 5 × 106 CFU WT 37°C YPIII Yptb expressing GFP (green) and stained for cleaved caspase 3 (red), DAPI (nuclei-blue), and phalloidin (F-actin-cyan). (j) Sum fluorescence intensity of cleaved caspase 3. Each point represents either a raptinal-induced apoptotic epithelial cell or a WT 37°C-infected M cell. 40 WT 37°C-infected M cells were analyzed. Horizontal line indicates limit of detection. (k) TEER was measured before and after infection and plotted as % decrease. Statistics were performed with a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison tests. (j-k) Data were pooled from 3–4 independent experiments

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

YopE causes M cell extrusion. (a-h) Differentiated HIE25 RT+ ileal monolayers were infected for 5 hours with 5 × 106 CFU of (a) WT 37°C, (b) ΔyopO, (c) ΔyopH, (d) ΔyopE, (e) ΔyopE+yopErec, (f) ΔyopE+yopER144A, (g) ΔyopE+YopE1-100SptP166-293 or (h) ΔyopE+yopEL109A YPIII Yptb expressing GFP (green). Monolayers were stained with DAPI (nuclei-blue) and phalloidin (F-actin-cyan). Orthogonal XZ planes were analyzed for M cell extrusion. (i) The percentage of extruding infected M cells per field was plotted. Each point represents one Transwell. Bars indicate mean and SEM. Statistics were performed with a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison tests. (j) The number of Yptb internalized in each M cell was determined and the percentage of cells with specified number of internalized Yptb per field was plotted. Error bars indicate SEM. The data for WT 37°C and ΔyopE are the same as in Figure 4 k. Statistics were performed using a two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison tests and are shown in Table S4. (i-j) Data were pooled from 3+ independent experiments with 2–4 fields analyzed per Transwell and averaged

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

M cells infected with WT 26°C have reduced ability to be reinfected by WT 37°C. (a-d) Differentiated HIE25 RT+ ileal monolayers were (a) mock infected with noninfectious media, washed, and infected for 2.5 hours with 5 × 106 CFU of WT 37°C expressing mCherry (red), or (b) infected for 2.5 hours with 5 × 106 CFU of WT 26°C expressing GFP (green), washed, and infected for 2.5 hours with 5 × 106 CFU of WT 26°C expressing mCherry (red), or (c) infected for 2.5 hours with 5 × 106 CFU of WT 26°C expressing GFP (green), washed, and infected for 2.5 hours with 5 × 106 CFU of WT 37°C expressing mCherry (red). Monolayers were stained with DAPI (nuclei-blue). XY planes are maximum intensity projections. Magnified insets of an M cell are shown in upper left corner. (d) The number of mCherry Yptb per cell were counted using Volocity software. Each point represents an infected M cell. Bars indicate mean and SD. Data were pooled from 3 independent experiments with 3 fields analyzed per Transwell and averaged. Statistics were performed using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison tests

Transcytosis assays

On the day of infection, the TEER of monolayers that were grown on 3 µm Transwells was measured to ensure the monolayer was polarized (TEER > 400 Ω·cm2). Infections were carried out for 3 hours. After infection, Transwells were removed from the 24 well plate and placed in a new 24 well plate for fixation and the basolateral chamber media was plated on L irgasan (0.5 µg/mL) agar plates to determine the CFU. After fixation, the monolayers were permeabilized with 0.1% TritonX-100 in 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and stained with Alexa Fluor 647 phalloidin and DAPI. Every monolayer was scrutinized on a Nikon A1R confocal microscope for the presence of holes, defined as regions with loss of DAPI and phalloidin stains with GFP bacteria bound to the Transwell filter membrane. Monolayers with holes were omitted from further analysis of basolateral chamber CFU.

β-lactamase translocation assay

Translocation of YopE into host cells was measured using a β-lactamase assay. HEp-2 cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. On the day before the experiment, 1 × 105 HEp-2 cells were plated in 1 mL DMEM + 10% FBS in a 24-well plate and left to adhere overnight. On the day of the experiment, the DMEM in each well was replaced with enteroid differentiation media. HEp-2 cells were infected with WT YPIII Yptb grown at 37°C or 26°C expressing the fusion protein YopE1-100-β-lactamase at an MOI of 5:1 for either 1 h, 2 h, or 3 h in a tissue culture incubator at 37°C and 5% CO2. As a negative control, cells were also infected with a WT YPIII Yptb strain that does not express the fusion protein. Cells were then washed 2x with PBS to remove bacteria and treated with 100 µL trypsin for 2–3 minutes to lift cells off the plate. Trypsin was inactivated with DMEM + 10% FBS and cells were passed through cell strainers and placed into FACS tubes. Cells were incubated in DMEM with 1 µg/mL CCF2-AM (Invitrogen), 1.5 mM probenecid, 0.6% solution B, and 100 µg/mL gentamicin to kill extracellular bacteria. Unstained cells were included as a negative control. Blue and green fluorescent cells were quantified using flow cytometry and data was analyzed using FlowJo software.

Zombie live/dead cell death assays

The Zombie Red Live/Dead Discrimination Stain was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the following modifications. At 4.5 hours after infection, the media in the apical chamber was gently removed and monolayers were washed 1x with PBS. Zombie Red Live/Dead Discrimination Stain was diluted 1:200 in PBS and 100 µL was added to monolayers and incubated at 37°C in tissue incubator for 30 minutes. Following incubation, the monolayers were washed 2x with 1% BSA in PBS and were fixed and stored as described above.

Staining and confocal immunofluorescence microscopy

For surface staining of β1 integrin and GP2, monolayers were not permeabilized before primary staining. For staining of cleaved caspase 3, monolayers were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in 1% BSA in PBS for 5 minutes before primary staining. After permeabilization, Transwells were blocked in 5% BSA in PBS for 30 minutes at room temperature. Primary antibodies were diluted in 1% BSA in PBS at 1:100 with 100 µL applied per Transwell. Primary antibodies included GP2 (MBL International; cat #: D277-3), β1 integrin/CD29 (Fisher Scientific; cat #: BDB555442), and cleaved caspase 3 (Cell Signaling; cat #: 9661). The primary stain was carried out at room temperature in the dark for 1 hour. Transwells were then washed 3 times with PBS. Corresponding anti-mouse secondary Alexa Fluor antibodies were diluted 1:200 in 1% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, along with 1 µg/mL 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Invitrogen; cat#: 62,248) to stain the nuclei and Alexa Fluor 647 phalloidin at 1:100 (Invitrogen; cat #: A22287) to stain F-actin. The secondary stain was carried out at room temperature in the dark for 30 minutes and then the Transwells were washed 3 times. Stained monolayers were carefully cut from the Transwell using a scalpel and placed on glass slides with the cell layer facing up. Monolayers were covered with Prolong Gold antifade (Invitrogen; cat #: P36930) and mounted with a glass coverslip. Glass slides were placed at 4°C in the dark until they were brought to the microscope for image acquisition. Images were acquired with a Nikon A1R confocal microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc.) using a 40x oil immersion objective with 0.5 µm z-stacks. Images were analyzed using FIJI ImageJ or Volocity 6.3 software (Quorum Technologies).

Image acquisition and analysis

In initial experiments, M cells were located by presence of apical β1 integrin or GP2 proteins. After analysis of Yptb binding experiments, M cells were defined as cells that contained 6+ Yptb bound to the apical surface so that other antibody stains could be used. Images taken for RT+ monolayers were obtained in a blinded manner such that the only requirement for selecting a field for image capture was that at least 1 M cell was present in the field. While scanning the monolayers, the first three fields with M cells present were selected for image capture in each Transwell. Only Transwells with 4 + M cells cumulatively across the 3 images were used for subsequent analysis to ensure that data was being collected from monolayers that achieved robust M cell differentiation. The numbers of M cells per field depended on the pore size and experiment and ranged from 1 to 10 M cells per field. In RT- monolayers, three non-contiguous fields were randomly selected for analysis.

Images were blinded for all subsequent analysis and quantification. To analyze Yptb binding to differentiated cells of the intestinal monolayer, cells were manually counted for the presence of Yptb on the apical surface. When a single bacterium was present at a junction point between two cells, this was counted as one bacterium bound to one cell. To quantify M cell extrusion and Yptb internalization into M cells, the orthogonal views of the monolayers were observed with an image processing software. M cells were manually counted as apically extruding if any part of the M cell volume resided above the apical plane of the neighboring cells. Fully extruded cells that contained Yptb were eliminated from the analysis to prevent counting cells that had extruded in normal epithelial turnover prior to infection. Internalized Yptb were manually counted by locating the boundaries of a cell with F-actin. GFP Yptb that fell within the boundaries of the F-actin stain were counted as internalized. The fluorescence intensity for phalloidin was measured as described in.49

For Zombie Live/Dead cell analysis, Volocity was used to measure the sum fluorescence intensity of the Zombie Red channel. Dead cells were determined by locating cells that were Zombie positive, extruding, and had a ratio of sum DAPI fluorescence/DAPI volume that was greater than that for live cells to signify bright condensing nuclei. For cleaved caspase 3 analysis, Volocity was used to measure the sum fluorescence intensity of the Alexa Fluor 594 channel (cleaved caspase 3). Cells were induced to undergo apoptosis using 13 µM raptinal (AdipoGen; cat#: AG-CR1-2902) and apoptotic cells were defined as cells positive for cleaved caspase 3.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were completed using GraphPad Prism Software version 8. Statistical tests used are described in individual figure legends, where * p < .05, ** p < .01, *** p < .001, **** p < .0001, and ns = no significance for all figures and supplemental tables.

Tissue collection / ethics statement

Human ileal enteroid cultures were obtained from de-identified biopsy tissue from healthy subjects who provided informed consent. Methods were performed following regulations that were approved by the Baylor College of Medicine’s Institutional Review Board and the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board.

Results:

Large numbers of Yptb bind to enteroid-derived M cells in an invasin-dependent manner

Infections of murine ligated loop models have established that Yptb targets to M cells. However, it has been challenging to understand cellular events at the Yptb-M cell interface due to the lack of an appropriate intestinal cell culture system that faithfully recapitulates the cellular microenvironment found in the ileum overlaying PP. We overcome this critical block in the field by using human ileal enteroid-derived monolayers containing at least four major intestinal cell types and M cells.49 To investigate the ability of Yptb to bind to these intestinal cells, monolayers derived from human ileal enteroid line HIE25 were differentiated in the presence of RANKL and TNFα (RT+), conditions that promote M cell development,49 or in their absence (RT-). Monolayers were apically infected with WT Yptb YPIII expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP). After 5-hour infection, RT- monolayers had few Yptb bound to the apical surface of cells (Figure 1a, white circles). Investigation of the orthogonal planes indicated that a single Yptb bacterium was often located at intercellular junctions (Figure 1b, orange arrows). By contrast, RT+ monolayers had many Yptb bound to the surface of GP2+ M cells (Figure 1c-d, green arrows). Quantification of Yptb binding showed that more than 90% of Yptb-associated cells in RT- monolayers had only 1 Yptb bound per cell, while the remaining Yptb-associated cells had 2–5 Yptb bound (Figure 1e). In RT+ monolayers, over 40% of Yptb-associated cells per field had 6+ Yptb bound which corresponded to approximately 3 cells per field and these cells often had over 30 Yptb bound per cell (Figure 1c-f). The remaining cells had either 1 Yptb or 2–5 Yptb bound, consistent with the pattern of binding observed in RT- monolayers (Figure 1e). The number of cells associated with either 1 Yptb per field or 2–5 Yptb per field was not significantly different between RT- and RT+ monolayers (figure 1f).

In RT+ monolayers, we occasionally noted that cells with 6+ Yptb bound had no or low expression of GP2 and that some GP2+ cells did not have Yptb bound (Figure 1c). Since GP2 is a late marker of M cells,54,55 we evaluated Yptb adhesion by locating M cells with apical β1 integrin expression (Figure 2). Apical β1 integrin staining was detected in RT+ monolayers, but not in RT- monolayers (Figure 2a, b). As observed previously with GP2+ M cells,49 staining with the F-actin labeling dye phalloidin showed reduced apical F-actin expression on β1 integrin+ M cells compared to neighboring non-M cells (Figure 2c, d). These M cells were frequently bound by more than 6 Yptb (Figure 2e). Quantification of the number of GP2+ or β1 integrin positive cells that were associated with 6+ Yptb showed that 52% of the GP2+ cells and 68% of the β1 integrin+ cells had 6+ Yptb bound. Since no instances of 6+ Yptb bound to a cell were found in RT-monolayers, M cells were defined as cells with 6+ Yptb bound for further analyses.

To determine which adhesin proteins are important for binding to M cells, RT+ monolayers were infected with WT Yptb and the adhesin mutant strains, ΔyadA, Δinv, and Δinv/yadA, all expressing GFP. There was no difference in the percentage of cells with 6+ Yptb bound when infected with WT and ΔyadA (Figure 2e, f, i). In the absence of invasin, almost no cells were detected with 6+ Yptb bound (Figure 2g, h, i, j). All strains bound singly or in smaller groups (1–5 bacteria) throughout the monolayers (Figure 2i, j). Thus, invasin promotes Yptb adhesion to enteroid-derived M cells.

Combined, these data show that Yptb bound sparsely to ileal epithelial monolayers, however when M cells were present, most bacteria were bound to M cells in large numbers in an invasin-dependent manner. Therefore, the enteroid-derived monolayer model is a valuable system that recapitulates Yptb binding observed in vivo in murine models. Importantly, this allows us for the first time to examine the fate of Yptb-infected M cells in the context of an epithelium that maintains distinct cellular functions.

T3SS non-expressing Yptb efficiently gain access to the basolateral side in the presence of M cells compared to Yptb expressing the T3SS

To determine if Yptb reaches the basolateral side during infection in an M cell-dependent manner, HIE25 ileal monolayers were infected with WT Yptb grown at 37°C (WT 37°C), conditions which induce T3SS expression. Infections lasted 3 hours to limit bacterial replication in the basolateral chamber. Increased colony forming units (CFU) were detected in the basolateral chamber of RT+ monolayers compared to RT-monolayers (Figure 3a). The transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) was taken to assess monolayer integrity and confirmed that the increase in CFU was not due to compromised barrier function in RT+ monolayers (TEER, 550 ± 57 Ω·cm2) compared to RT- monolayers (TEER, 619 ± 45 Ω·cm2).

Since the Yptb T3SS prevents internalization and phagocytosis,19,30 we evaluated the role of the T3SS in transcytosis by M cells using a strain of Yptb genetically lacking the T3SS (ΔyscNU 37°C) and WT Yptb grown at 26°C (WT 26°C), conditions under which the T3SS is not expressed.24 These strains were transported through M cell-containing monolayers at levels nearly 10-fold above WT 37°C, indicating that the absence of T3SS expression allows for more efficient access to the basolateral side. The CFU recovered for ΔyscNU 37°C and WT 26°C in RT-monolayers were near the limit of detection and similar to WT 37°C.

The receptor CD137 on M cells in mice has been reported to contribute to M cell functional maturity and increased transcytosis of particles.56 CD137L is the ligand for CD137 and is a TNF superfamily member that is present on stromal cells and bone marrow-derived cells in PP.56 To determine if CD137L increased enteroid-derived M cell functionality by means of increased transcytosis of Yptb, CD137L was added to the M cell induction media with RANKL and TNFα during differentiation. The CFU recovered in the basolateral chamber of RT+/CD137L monolayers were slightly but not significantly increased for the T3SS non-expressing strains with respect to RT+ monolayers (Figure 3a).

To confirm that M cell transcytosis was not confined to a single line of ileal enteroids, transcytosis was investigated with a different human ileal enteroid line, HIE59.57 As with HIE25, the CFU recovered in the basolateral chamber of ΔyscNU 37°C or WT 26°C infected RT+ monolayers were increased 10-fold compared to WT 37°C (Figure 3b). The CFU recovered in RT- monolayers were near or at the limit of detection in all infection conditions. Similarly, the TEER did not differ significantly between RT- (TEER, 681 ± 153 Ω·cm2) and RT+ (TEER, 588 ± 133 Ω·cm2) monolayers.

Yptb T3SS reduces entry of Yptb into M cells

To gain insight into the result that T3SS non-expressing Yptb reached the basolateral compartment in larger numbers compared to Yptb expressing the T3SS, we analyzed the orthogonal planes of infected monolayers (Figure 4a-j). Most WT 37°C Yptb remained extracellularly bound to the surface of M cells, although uptake of a few Yptb by some M cells was observed (Figure 4b). To quantify the degree of bacterial internalization, we determined the percentage of M cells with 0 Yptb internalized (Yptb remained bound to the M cell surface), 1–9 Yptb internalized (Yptb on surface and internalized), or 10+ Yptb internalized (Yptb fully internalized) (Figure 4k, Table S1). About 80% of M cells infected with WT 37°C had no Yptb internalized and a smaller percentage of M cells had 1–9 Yptb internalized (Figure 4b, k, Table S1). By contrast, over 95% of M cells infected with ΔyscNU or WT 26°C had at least one Yptb internalized with over 80% of M cells having 10+ Yptb internalized (Figure 4c, d, k, Table S1). Combined with the transcytosis data, these results indicate that T3SS non-expressing Yptb are more efficiently internalized whereas T3SS expression greatly reduces, but does not fully prevent, Yptb internalization and transcytosis by M cells.

YopE and YopH contribute to the inhibition of Yptb internalization by M cells

Given the well-established role of the T3SS effectors YopE, YopH, and YopO in preventing Yptb uptake in a variety of cells,27–31 we next probed for their involvement in Yptb internalization by M cells. Similar to WT 37°C, the interaction of ΔyopO or ΔyopH with M cells was mostly restricted to cell surface binding, although a sizable, but not statistically different, minority of M cells had 1–9 ΔyopH internalized (Figure 4e, f, k, Table S1). After infection with ΔyopE, the three internalization classes were almost evenly divided (Figure 4g, k). This intermediary phenotype of ΔyopE was reflected in the percentage of M cells with 10+ Yptb internalized, which was significantly increased compared to WT 37°C, but significantly decreased compared to T3SS non-expressing strains (Table S1). Complementation of ΔyopE by expressing YopE from its native locus (yopErec) restored the phenotype back to WT 37°C (Figure 4h, k, Table S1). ΔyopEO had a phenotype between ΔyopE and ΔyopO, with the majority of M cells taking up 1–9 Yptb (Figure 4i, k, Table S1). Finally, the percentage of M cells with 10+ Yptb internalized of ΔyopEH was similar to the T3SS non-expressing strains but significantly different from ΔyopE (Figure 4j, k, Table S1). Combined, these data indicate that the inhibition of internalization seen in ΔyopE is abrogated by ΔyopEH, suggesting that together YopE and YopH contribute to inhibition of internalization by M cells while YopO has less of an effect.

Yptb T3SS causes M cell extrusion from ileal monolayers independent of cell death

We noted that infected M cells bound by WT 37°C were extruding apically from the monolayers (Figures 4b, 5a). By contrast, uninfected M cells and M cells infected with ΔyscNU or WT 26°C remained flat within the monolayer indicating that extrusion is dependent on the T3SS (Figure 4a, c, d, 5a). The slight but non-significant increase in M cell extrusion after infection with WT 26°C compared to ΔyscNU is likely explained by 37°C-induced expression of the T3SS in WT 26°C that remained apically present during infection. To explore when the T3SS is expressed by WT 26°C under these in vitro growth conditions, HEp-2 cells in enteroid differentiation media were infected with WT Yptb grown at 37°C or 26°C expressing a YopE-β-lactamase fusion protein (Figure 5b). This assay measures injection of Yops into host cells by using a cell permeable fluorescent dye that is cleaved by β-lactamase to cause blue fluorescence, whereas uninfected cells fluoresce green. At 1 hour of infection, the percentage of blue cells was significantly higher when infected with WT 37°C compared to WT 26°C (Figure 5b). At 2 hours of infection, the percentage of blue cells was similar between infection with WT 37°C or WT 26°C (Figure 5b). This suggests that under these in vitro growth conditions, WT 26°C turns on the T3SS and injects effectors into host cells within two hours and thus could account for the small percentage of WT 26°C-induced extruding cells. It is possible that Yptb can reach M cells before maximal expression of the T3SS because the intestinal transit time to the terminal ileum varies widely between individuals but averages between 2 and 6 hours58 and it is also unclear how transit through harsh environments like the stomach affects T3SS expression.

Cell extrusion can occur when epithelial cells die, which can be induced by infection with some enteric pathogens such as Salmonella and EHEC.59,60 To determine if Yptb causes infected M cells to die, a Zombie Live/Dead discrimination stain was used to observe if infected M cells lose membrane integrity during the 5-hour infection (Figure 5c-f). Dead extruding cells, defined by bright condensed nuclei, were sparsely located in uninfected monolayers and were used as a positive control for Zombie staining (red) (Figure 5c, d, Table S2). Uninfected monolayers had 0.4–3.1% of non-extruding cells stain with Zombie at two orders of magnitude below the positive controls (Table S2). 10 of 32 WT 37°C-infected and 5 of 27 ΔyscNU-infected M cells (31% and 18.5%, respectively) had Zombie fluorescence that was also within the fluorescence range of uninfected non-extruding positive cells. For comparison, 2 of 37 of uninfected GP2+ M cells (5.4%) had Zombie fluorescence within this range (Figure 5c). The majority of WT 37°C-infected and ΔyscNU-infected M cells (60% and 81.5%, respectively) were not Zombie positive (Figure 5c, e, f, Table S2). Three WT 37°C- infected M cells had Zombie fluorescence levels similar to dead cells (Figure 5e, panel 2). These M cells appeared to be almost fully extruded, although not all nearly extruded M cells had Zombie intensity at the level of dead cells (Figure 5e, panel 2). Since 60% of WT 37°C-infected M cells did not lose detectable membrane integrity, these data indicate that Yptb-induced M cell extrusion begins prior to loss of membrane integrity and suggest that Yptb is not triggering lytic cell death prior to extrusion.

Cells undergoing early apoptosis do not lose membrane integrity, yet apoptotic signals often lead to cell extrusion.61 Cleavage of caspase 3, an executioner caspase, leads to downstream pathways that initiate apoptotic features.62,63 To evaluate whether WT 37°C causes M cells to undergo apoptosis, monolayers were stained for cleaved caspase 3. Uninfected monolayers had 1.5–5.1% of cells stain positively for cleaved caspase 3 (Figure 5g, Table S3). Monolayers treated for 5 hours with raptinal, an apoptosis inducer, had many cells stain positively for cleaved caspase 3 (red) (Figure 5h). By contrast, 36 of 40 WT 37°C-infected extruding M cells (90%) were negative for cleaved caspase 3 (Figure 5i, j). The 4 infected M cells above the limit of detection had fluorescence levels below that of raptinal-induced apoptotic cells (Figure 5j). TEER measurements taken before and after raptinal treatment or infection revealed a severe loss in monolayer integrity after raptinal treatment, but a small non-significant decrease in TEER in infection conditions compared to uninfected monolayers (Figure 5k). Collectively, the Zombie, cleaved caspase 3, and TEER results support the idea that Yptb-induced M cell extrusion occurs independently of cell death and does not cause significant disruptions to monolayer integrity.

YopE RhoA-GAP activity is primarily responsible for M cell extrusion

Since M cells, but not adjacent cells, were extruding from the monolayer, this event was likely due to Yptb binding or injection of Yops into M cells. To investigate the involvement of Yops in M cell extrusion, orthogonal planes of monolayers infected with yop mutants were analyzed. Infection with ΔyopO or ΔyopH caused levels of M cell extrusion similar to WT 37°C (Figure 6a-c, i). By contrast, M cells infected with ΔyopE rarely extruded (Figure 6d, i). Complementation of ΔyopE (yopErec) restored M cell extrusion back to the level seen with WT 37°C (Figure 6a, e, i). Since over 30% of M cells infected with ΔyopE had 10+ Yptb internalized (Figure 4k), this raised the possibility that these ΔyopE-infected M cells simply might not extrude because rapid uptake of Yptb results in no Yop injection. However, of the M cells with 0 ΔyopE internalized, only 11% were extruding, implying that YopE plays an active role in causing extrusion.

YopE targets Rac1 and RhoA of the Rho GTPase family of proteins that are involved in actin organization and assembly at cell-cell junctions.64 To determine if YopE-GAP activity is needed for M cell extrusion, monolayers were infected with the YopE catalytic mutant, yopER144A, which binds to small GTPases but lacks GAP activity.32 The catalytic mutant yopER144A behaved similarly to ΔyopE, with a significant reduction in M cell extrusion compared to WT 37°C (figure 6f, i). Analysis of Yptb internalization revealed that yopER144A also behaved similarly to ΔyopE having an intermediary phenotype between the three internalization classes (Figure 6j, Table S4). The contribution of YopE-GAP activity to M cell extrusion was evaluated using two additional YopE mutants, yopESptP or yopEL109A. YopE1-100SptP166-293 is a fusion protein that has the secretion and translocation domains of YopE and the GAP activity of Salmonella SptP, which lacks RhoA-GAP activity and has slightly weaker Rac1-GAP activity (about 80% of WT YopE).33 Yptb expressing yopESptP was significantly impaired in causing M cell extrusion and remained mostly bound to the apical surface of M cells (Figure 6g, i, j, Table S4). By contrast, infection with yopEL109A, which has partially reduced RhoA-GAP activity (about 70% of WT YopE) and normal Rac1-GAP activity,33 caused M cell extrusion similar to WT 37°C and had a Yptb internalization phenotype similar to WT 37°C (Figure 6h-j, Table S4). Combined, these data suggest that the RhoA-GAP activity of YopE is primarily responsible for causing M cells to extrude from the epithelium. Furthermore, since both yopESptP and yopEL109A retain Rac1-GAP activity, while yopER144A does not, these data also support the idea that the Rac1-GAP activity of YopE contributes to inhibiting internalization by M cells.

M cells infected with WT 26°C have a reduced ability to be reinfected by WT 37°C

Since Yptb infections are often acquired by eating contaminated food stored at cold temperatures, the bacteria may reach the intestine before fully expressing the T3SS, with subsequent growth in the intestine causing induction of T3SS expression. To model this scenario, we evaluated the interaction of Yptb with M cells that were first infected with GFP-expressing WT 26°C and then challenged 2.5 hours later with mCherry-expressing WT 26°C or WT 37°C (Figure 7). The number of mCherry-expressing Yptb associated with M cells grown under either condition were compared to the number of mCherry-expressing WT 37°C associated with M cells without prior Yptb infection. Prior infection with WT 26°C dramatically decreased the ability of WT 37°C to associate with M cells during subsequent infection (Figure 7a, c, d). By contrast, mCherry-expressing WT 26°C associated with M cells after prior infection as efficiently as infection with WT 37°C without prior infection (Figure 7a, b, d). These results are consistent with the idea that prior infection with WT 26°C reduces the number of apically exposed β1 integrins so WT 37°C that express reduced invasin65,66 are at a competitive disadvantage in associating with M cells.

Discussion

M cells are used by many pathogens to penetrate the intestinal epithelial barrier, yet the intricate host-pathogen interactions that occur at the M cell interface have been challenging to study in vitro due to biological limitations of current transformed cell culture models.41 By employing human enteroid-derived monolayers containing functional M cells interspersed among an epithelium containing at least 4 other intestinal cell types, we reproduced the findings in ligated loop models that Yptb binds and congregates specifically to M cells in an invasin dependent manner.2,14 We further exploit this model to discover how Yops impact M cell function and fate, to find that the consequences of these interactions could affect the ability of Yptb to establish a successful foothold in underlying tissues.

By exploiting the Transwell model, we distinguish the impact of early infectious state (low levels of Yop-expression) from host-adapted state on M cells to understand the conundrum of how Yptb gets through M cells when YopE and YopH prevent internalization and phagocytosis, yet are essential for survival in the intestinal tract and PP.15,28,30,31,39,40,67,68 Yops were injected into and were effective in M cells because WT 37°C caused M cell extrusion in a YopE GAP-dependent manner and were rarely internalized by M cells due to YopE and YopH. However, an important consideration in envisioning initial steps in the establishment of Yptb infection is that Yptb consumed in contaminated liquids or food at cold temperatures may reach the intestine and encounter M cells before fully expressing the T3SS. Consistent with this idea, up to 60% of ingested dyes can reach the terminal ileum in humans as fast as 1.5–4 hours in some studies.58,69 Here, we found that transcytosis of Yptb grown at ambient temperatures mimicking the early infectious stage (WT 26°C) occurred at levels 10 times that of host-adapted (WT 37°C) Yptb expressing the T3SS. In the non-polarized model, injection of Yops by Yptb grown at ambient temperature was very low after 1 hour incubation at 37°C, but comparable to the levels observed by Yptb grown at 37°C after the 2 hour incubation. However, this system does not take into account the acidic environment encountered by Yptb during transit and its potential impact on T3SS expression and it has recently been shown that low acidic environment causes base components of the Y. enterocolitica T3SS to disassociate.70 Therefore, it is plausible that Yptb may not be fully expressing the T3SS when it first encounters M cells.

Even though transcytosis of WT 37°C was less frequent, it was still significantly detected in the presence of M cells compared to the absence, demonstrating that M cell-containing monolayers are required for detectable transcytosis in this model. Murine studies with T3SS mutants, such as yscNU, have shown that these bacteria are able to colonize PP but are far less likely to survive at 24 hours post-infection.39,68 Since the T3SS gives Yptb an advantage upon encountering immune cells,22 it is possible that the rare T3SS-expressing Yptb that breach M cells are ultimately more successful in animal infection. Alternatively, the successful bacteria may be those that are expressing low levels of Yops during encounter with M cells but are ramping up T3SS expression as they travel through the M cell. In fact, consistent with this idea, during infection Yersinia can respond rapidly to environmental cues, such as host cell contact, to increase the copy number of the plasmid carrying the T3SS, which is essential for virulence.71

Intestinal cell extrusion is a normal part of epithelial regeneration that occurs when cells are shed from the epithelium and undergo anoikis, a detachment induced form of apoptosis.72 In addition, pathogens can also induce different inflammatory and non-inflammatory cell extrusion processes, which are often characterized by cell death.73 Salmonella promotes destruction and death of M cells in murine ileal ligated loops resulting in open gaps in the FAE that allow for additional invasion of bacteria.74 Salmonella has also been shown to induce death and extrusion of intestinal epithelial cells characterized by inflammatory caspase activation.59,75 By contrast, Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli infection of MDCK cells activates RhoA to cause a non-cell death extrusion.60 Here we show that Yptb-induced M cell extrusion was dependent on the RhoA-GAP activity of YopE and was not triggered by cell death.

How does the loss of RhoA activity promote M cell extrusion? RhoA stimulates contractility and promotes actin stress fiber formation by regulating actomyosin complexes that control tension and forces between cells, which helps to maintain epithelial monolayer integrity.64,76,77 Widespread inactivation of RhoA, using the Rho specific inhibitor C3 transferase, prevents apical extrusion of apoptotic cells.78 During Yptb infection, targeted injection of Yops into only M cells limits the inhibitory effects of YopE on RhoA to within infected M cells. Therefore, localized M cell extrusion may be similar to a cell non-autonomous extrusion process whereby neighboring cells actively participate by recognizing local changes in tension.79 Two recent reports have shown that contractile tension that occurs in response to a perturbation, such as apoptosis or inducible expression of the epithelial morphogenesis transcription factor Snail6SA in some cells, activates RhoA in neighboring cells resulting in apical extrusion of affected cells.80,81 Based on these findings, it is plausible that YopE inhibition of RhoA activity in M cells results in the generation of contractile tension that is sensed by neighboring cells that respond by activating RhoA to contract and squeeze the infected M cell out of the monolayer. The idea that neighboring cells respond to infected M cells is supported by our findings that the TEER did not decrease after infection and that monolayers stained for F-actin appeared to be closing up beneath extruding M cells (unpublished data). Therefore, unlike Salmonella induced destruction of M cells,74 it is not likely that Yptb-induced M cell extrusion creates holes in the FAE as additional access points for Yptb.

In mice, sequential infection with green-fluorescing Y. enterocolitica followed by infection with red-fluorescing Y. enterocolitica 2 days later resulted in infection by red bacteria of PP that were not already colonized by green bacteria.17 In addition, enteric Yersinia form clonal microcolonies in PP and deeper tissues.15,17,18 These findings show that the host may limit infection at the level of PP invasion and/or survival in PP.17 Our observation that M cells infected with WT 37°C induced M cells to extrude indicate a possible means by which a secondary infection could be limited via temporary depletion of M cells above a PP. M cell depletion has been described after reovirus type I infection in mice and porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) infection in pigs,82,83 although the mechanisms are not defined. It remains to be observed what the long-term (48-hour post infection) effects of infection with WT 26°C may be and whether this too could impair M cell function.

Our studies of Yptb interactions with M cells provide two important insights into M cell development and function. First, as M cells develop after exposure to RANKL and TNFα,46,47 they gain expression of various markers including GP2, a late stage marker of M cells indicative of maturity.54,55 When expression of apical β1 integrin occurs in the developmental timeline is unknown; however, the observation that a population of GP2 low/negative cells bound Yptb and that these cells were β1 integrin+ supports the idea that apical β1 integrin may be expressed earlier in M cell development. While GP2 low/negative cells have reduced uptake capabilities,84 Yptb uptake by these M cells is likely efficient given the nature of the strong invasin-β1 integrin interaction.85,86 These M cells could also be at risk for depletion from the FAE by YopE-induced extrusion implying that multiple developmental stages of M cells may be affected by Yptb. Second, M cell functionality can be induced by molecules other than those that contribute to M cell lineage commitment including CD137L, S100A4, and retinoic acid/lymphotoxin (LT-α2β1).56,87,88 The combination of CD137L with RANKL and TNFα during differentiation yielded no further increase in transcytosis of Yptb. Since CD137L is a TNFα family member, it is possible that CD137L and TNFα stimulate similar signaling pathways to invoke M cell functional maturation and their presence together is redundant.

In summary, this study emphasizes the power of using enteroid models to uncover new insights into pathogen-epithelium interactions. Using this approach, we discovered that Yptb Yops impair M cell function by reducing Yptb uptake and causing M cell extrusion, both of which may benefit the host. These findings support the idea that efficient transit of Yptb through M cells occurs before high levels of T3SS expression. Future work is focused on increasing the complexity of this enteroid system by including immune cells to explore how the status of T3SS expression of WT Yptb affects Yptb survival as it breaches the FAE and encounters immune cells.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material

Acknowledgments

We thank Eric Stas (Boston Children’s Hospital), Igor Brodsky (University of Pennsylvania), Alenka Lovy, members of the Kaplan, Ng, and Ward Labs (Tufts Medical Center), Lamyaa Shaban, Giang Nguyen, Anne McCabe, Pathricia Leus, Rebecca Silver, Yoelkys Morales, and previous members of the Mecsas Lab for technical support, strains, and/or critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by NIAID U19AI131126 to RRI (Tufts University School of Medicine) and Dr. Kaplan (Tufts University) with JM serving as Project 2 Leader; NIAID R21AI128093 to JM; NIH U19AI116497 to MKE; the Integrated Physiology Core of the Hopkins Conte Digestive Disease Basic and Translational Research Core Center (NIH DK-809502) for HIE59; and the Tufts Center for Neuroscience Research, P30 NS047243 for confocal imaging. DTB was supported in part by the Harvard Digestive Disease Center P30 DK034854. ACF was supported in part by NIAID T32AI007077.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [U19AI131126]; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [U19AI116497]; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R21AI128093, U19AI131126]; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [T32AI007077]; National institute of diabetes and digestive and kidney diseases [DK034854]; National institute of diabetes and digestive and kidney diseases [DK-809502].

Data Availability:

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, JM, upon reasonable request.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.

References

  • 1.Mabbott NA, Donaldson DS, Ohno H, Williams IR, Mahajan A.. Microfold (M) cells: important immunosurveillance posts in the intestinal epithelium. Mucosal Immunol. Jul 2013;6(4):666–22. doi: 10.1038/mi.2013.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clark MA, Hirst BH, Jepson MA. M-cell surface beta1 integrin expression and invasin-mediated targeting of yersinia pseudotuberculosis to mouse peyer’s patch M cells. Infect Immun. Mar 1998;66(3):1237–1243. doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.3.1237-1243.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jensen VB, Harty JT, Jones BD. Interactions of the invasive pathogens salmonella typhimurium, listeria monocytogenes, and shigella flexneri with M cells and murine peyer’s patches. Infect Immun. Aug 1998;66(8):3758–3766. doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.8.3758-3766.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dillon A, Lo DD. M cells: intelligent engineering of mucosal immune surveillance. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1499. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Owen RL. Uptake and transport of intestinal macromolecules and microorganisms by M cells in peyer’s patches–a personal and historical perspective. Semin Immunol. Jun 1999;11(3):157–163. doi: 10.1006/smim.1999.0171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kucharzik T, Lugering N, Rautenberg K. Role of M cells in intestinal barrier function. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;915:171–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05240.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brocklehurst TF, Lund BM. The influence of pH, temperature and organic acids on the initiation of growth of yersinia enterocolitica. J Appl Bacteriol. Sep 1990;69(3):390–397. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1990.tb01529.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Centers for Disease C, Prevention . Notes from the field: yersinia enterocolitica infections associated with pasteurized milk — southwestern Pennsylvania, March-August, 2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Oct 21 2011;60(41):1428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.MacDonald E, Heier BT, Nygard K. Yersinia enterocolitica outbreak associated with ready-to-eat salad mix, Norway, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis. Sep 2012;18(9):1496–1499. doi: 10.3201/eid1809.120087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nuorti JP, Niskanen T, Hallanvuo S. A widespread outbreak of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis O:3 infection from iceberg lettuce. J Infect Dis. Mar 1 2004;189(5):766–774. doi: 10.1086/381766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Parn T, Hallanvuo S, Salmenlinna S. Outbreak of yersinia pseudotuberculosis O:1 infection associated with raw milk consumption, Finland, spring 2014. Euro Surveill. 2015;20(40). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2015.20.40.30033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rimhanen-Finne R, Niskanen T, Hallanvuo S. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis causing a large outbreak associated with carrots in Finland, 2006. Epidemiol Infect. Mar 2009;137(3):342–347. doi: 10.1017/S0950268807000155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dube P. Interaction of yersinia with the gut: mechanisms of pathogenesis and immune evasion. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2009;337:61–91. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-01846-6_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Marra A, Isberg RR. Invasin-dependent and invasin-independent pathways for translocation of yersinia pseudotuberculosis across the peyer’s patch intestinal epithelium. Infect Immun. Aug 1997;65(8):3412–3421. doi: 10.1128/IAI.65.8.3412-3421.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mecsas J, Bilis I, Falkow S. Identification of attenuated yersinia pseudotuberculosis strains and characterization of an orogastric infection in BALB/c mice on day 5 postinfection by signature-tagged mutagenesis. Infect Immun. May 2001;69(5):2779–2787. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.5.2779-2787.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Barnes PD, Bergman MA, Mecsas J, Isberg RR. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis disseminates directly from a replicating bacterial pool in the intestine. J Exp Med. Jun 12 2006;203(6):1591–1601. doi: 10.1084/jem.20060905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Oellerich MF, Jacobi CA, Freund S. Yersinia enterocolitica infection of mice reveals clonal invasion and abscess formation. Infect Immun. Aug 2007;75(8):3802–3811. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00419-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Davis KM, Mohammadi S, Isberg RR. Community behavior and spatial regulation within a bacterial microcolony in deep tissue sites serves to protect against host attack. Cell Host Microbe. Jan 14 2015;17(1):21–31. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Viboud GI, Bliska JB. YERSINIA OUTER PROTEINS: role in modulation of host cell signaling responses and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2005;59(1):69–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Plano GV, Schesser K. The yersinia pestis type III secretion system: expression, assembly and role in the evasion of host defenses. Immunol Res. Dec 2013;57(1–3):237–245. doi: 10.1007/s12026-013-8454-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Whelan R, McVicker G, Leo JC. Staying out or going in? the interplay between type 3 and type 5 secretion systems in adhesion and invasion of enterobacterial pathogens. Int J Mol Sci. Jun 8 2020;21(11). doi: 10.3390/ijms21114102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bliska JB, Wang X, Viboud GI, Brodsky IE. Modulation of innate immune responses by yersinia type III secretion system translocators and effectors. Cell Microbiol. Oct 2013;15(10):1622–1631. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bolin I, Wolf-Watz H. The plasmid-encoded Yop2b protein of yersinia pseudotuberculosis is a virulence determinant regulated by calcium and temperature at the level of transcription. Mol Microbiol. Mar 1988;2(2):237–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1988.tb00025.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Skurnik M, Bolin I, Heikkinen H, Piha S, Wolf-Watz H. Virulence plasmid-associated autoagglutination in yersinia spp. J Bacteriol. Jun 1984;158(3):1033–1036. doi: 10.1128/JB.158.3.1033-1036.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rosqvist R, Magnusson KE, Wolf-Watz H. Target cell contact triggers expression and polarized transfer of yersinia YopE cytotoxin into mammalian cells. EMBO J. Feb 15 1994;13(4):964–972. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06341.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pettersson J, Nordfelth R, Dubinina E. Modulation of virulence factor expression by pathogen target cell contact. Science. Aug 30 1996;273(5279):1231–1233. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5279.1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Andersson K, Carballeira N, Magnusson KE. YopH of yersinia pseudotuberculosis interrupts early phosphotyrosine signalling associated with phagocytosis. Mol Microbiol. Jun 1996;20(5):1057–1069. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02546.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Black DS, Bliska JB. The RhoGAP activity of the yersinia pseudotuberculosis cytotoxin YopE is required for antiphagocytic function and virulence. Mol Microbiol. Aug 2000;37(3):515–527. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cornelis GR. The yersinia Ysc-Yop ‘type III’ weaponry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. Oct 2002;3(10):742–752. doi: 10.1038/nrm932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fallman M, Andersson K, Hakansson S, Magnusson KE, Stendahl O, Wolf-Watz H. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis inhibits Fc receptor-mediated phagocytosis in J774 cells. Infect Immun. Aug 1995;63(8):3117–3124. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.8.3117-3124.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fallman M, Deleuil F, McGee K. Resistance to phagocytosis by yersinia. Int J Med Microbiol. Feb 2002;291(6–7):501–509. doi: 10.1078/1438-4221-00159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Von Pawel-Rammingen U, Telepnev MV, Schmidt G, Aktories K, Wolf-Watz H, Rosqvist R. GAP activity of the yersinia YopE cytotoxin specifically targets the Rho pathway: a mechanism for disruption of actin microfilament structure. Mol Microbiol. May 2000;36(3):737–748. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01898.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Songsungthong W, Higgins MC, Rolan HG, Murphy JL, Mecsas J. ROS-inhibitory activity of YopE is required for full virulence of yersinia in mice. Cell Microbiol. Jul 2010;12(7):988–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01448.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mejia E, Bliska JB, Viboud GI. Yersinia controls type III effector delivery into host cells by modulating rho activity. PLoS Pathog. Jan 2008;4(1):e3. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Persson C, Nordfelth R, Andersson K, Forsberg A, Wolf-Watz H, Fallman M. Localization of the yersinia PTPase to focal complexes is an important virulence mechanism. Mol Microbiol. Aug 1999;33(4):828–838. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01529.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bliska JB, Guan KL, Dixon JE, Falkow S. Tyrosine phosphate hydrolysis of host proteins by an essential yersinia virulence determinant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Feb 15 1991;88(4):1187–1191. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.4.1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Grosdent N, Maridonneau-Parini I, Sory MP, Cornelis GR. Role of yops and adhesins in resistance of yersinia enterocolitica to phagocytosis. Infect Immun. Aug 2002;70(8):4165–4176. doi: 10.1128/iai.70.8.4165-4176.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Groves E, Rittinger K, Amstutz M. Sequestering of rac by the yersinia effector YopO blocks Fcgamma receptor-mediated phagocytosis. J Biol Chem. Feb 5 2010;285(6):4087–4098. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.071035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Logsdon LK, Mecsas J. Requirement of the yersinia pseudotuberculosis effectors YopH and YopE in colonization and persistence in intestinal and lymph tissues. Infect Immun. Aug 2003;71(8):4595–4607. doi: 10.1128/iai.71.8.4595-4607.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Logsdon LK, Mecsas J. The proinflammatory response induced by wild-type yersinia pseudotuberculosis infection inhibits survival of yop mutants in the gastrointestinal tract and peyer’s patches. Infect Immun. Mar 2006;74(3):1516–1527. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.3.1516-1527.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pearce SC, Coia HG, Karl JP, Pantoja-Feliciano IG, Zachos NC, Racicot K. Intestinal in vitro and ex vivo models to study host-microbiome interactions and acute stressors. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1584. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fasciano AC, Mecsas J, Isberg RR. New age strategies to reconstruct mucosal tissue colonization and growth in cell culture systems. Microbiol Spectr. Mar 2019;7(2). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.BAI-0013-2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ranganathan S, Smith EM, Foulke-Abel JD, Barry EM. Research in a time of enteroids and organoids: how the human gut model has transformed the study of enteric bacterial pathogens. Gut Microbes. Nov 9 2020;12(1):1795492. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1795389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sato T, Stange DE, Ferrante M. Long-term expansion of epithelial organoids from human colon, adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and barrett’s epithelium. Gastroenterology. Nov 2011;141(5):1762–1772. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature. May 14 2009;459(7244):262–265. doi: 10.1038/nature07935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.de Lau W, Kujala P, Schneeberger K. Peyer’s patch M cells derived from Lgr5(+) stem cells require SpiB and are induced by RankL in cultured “miniguts”. Mol Cell Biol. Sep 2012;32(18):3639–3647. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00434-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wood MB, Rios D, Williams IR. TNF-alpha augments RANKL-dependent intestinal M cell differentiation in enteroid cultures. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. Sep 1 2016;311(3):C498–507. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00108.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ranganathan S, Doucet M, Grassel CL, Delaine-Elias B, Zachos NC, Barry EM. Evaluating shigella flexneri pathogenesis in the human enteroid model. Infect Immun. Apr 2019;87(4). doi: 10.1128/IAI.00740-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fasciano AC, Blutt SE, Estes MK, Mecsas J. Induced differentiation of M cell-like cells in human stem cell-derived ileal enteroid monolayers. J Vis Exp. Jul 26 2019;(149). doi: 10.3791/59894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zou WY, Blutt SE, Crawford SE. Human intestinal enteroids: new models to study gastrointestinal virus infections. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1576:229–247. doi: 10.1007/7651_2017_1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Heijmans J, Van Lidth De Jeude JF, Koo BK. ER stress causes rapid loss of intestinal epithelial stemness through activation of the unfolded protein response. Cell Rep. Apr 25 2013;3(4):1128–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mecsas J, Raupach B, Falkow S. The yersinia yops inhibit invasion of listeria, shigella and edwardsiella but not salmonella into epithelial cells. Mol Microbiol. Jun 1998;28(6):1269–1281. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00891.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Durand EA, Maldonado-Arocho FJ, Castillo C, Walsh RL, Mecsas J. The presence of professional phagocytes dictates the number of host cells targeted for Yop translocation during infection. Cell Microbiol. Aug 2010;12(8):1064–1082. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01451.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kanaya T, Hase K, Takahashi D. The Ets transcription factor Spi-B is essential for the differentiation of intestinal microfold cells. Nat Immunol. Jun 17 2012;13(8):729–736. doi: 10.1038/ni.2352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ohno H. Intestinal M cells. J Biochem. Feb 2016;159(2):151–160. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvv121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hsieh EH, Fernandez X, Wang J. CD137 is required for M cell functional maturation but not lineage commitment. Am J Pathol. Aug 2010;177(2):666–676. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Staab JF, Doucet M, Latanich R. Coronin-1 is necessary for enteric pathogen-induced transcytosis across human ileal enteroid monolayers expressing M cells. bioRxiv. 2020:2020.10.12.305565. doi: 10.1101/2020.10.12.305565. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Szarka LA, Camilleri M. Methods for the assessment of small-bowel and colonic transit. Semin Nucl Med. Mar 2012;42(2):113–123. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Knodler LA, Vallance BA, Celli J. Dissemination of invasive salmonella via bacterial-induced extrusion of mucosal epithelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct 12 2010;107(41):17733–17738. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006098107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Simovitch M, Sason H, Cohen S. EspM inhibits pedestal formation by enterohaemorrhagic escherichia coli and enteropathogenic E. coli and disrupts the architecture of a polarized epithelial monolayer. Cell Microbiol. Apr 1 2010;12(4):489–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01410.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Patel VA, Longacre A, Hsiao K. Apoptotic cells, at all stages of the death process, trigger characteristic signaling events that are divergent from and dominant over those triggered by necrotic cells: implications for the delayed clearance model of autoimmunity. J Biol Chem. Feb 24 2006;281(8):4663–4670. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508342200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Jelinek M, Balusikova K, Schmiedlova M. The role of individual caspases in cell death induction by taxanes in breast cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2015;15(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12935-015-0155-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.McIlwain DR, Berger T, Mak TW. Caspase functions in cell death and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. Apr 1 2013;5(4):a008656. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a008656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hall A. Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science. Jan 23 1998;279(5350):509–514. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5350.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Isberg RR, Swain A, Falkow S. Analysis of expression and thermoregulation of the yersinia pseudotuberculosis inv gene with hybrid proteins. Infect Immun. Aug 1988;56(8):2133–2138. doi: 10.1128/IAI.56.8.2133-2138.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pepe JC, Badger JL, Miller VL. Growth phase and low pH affect the thermal regulation of the yersinia enterocolitica inv gene. Mol Microbiol. Jan 1994;11(1):123–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00295.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Persson C, Carballeira N, Wolf-Watz H, Fallman M. The PTPase YopH inhibits uptake of yersinia, tyrosine phosphorylation of p130Cas and FAK, and the associated accumulation of these proteins in peripheral focal adhesions. EMBO J. May 1 1997;16(9):2307–2318. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.9.2307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Balada-Llasat JM, Mecsas J. Yersinia has a tropism for B and T cell zones of lymph nodes that is independent of the type III secretion system. PLoS Pathog. Sep 2006;2(9):e86. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Maurer AH. Gastrointestinal motility, part 2: small-bowel and colon transit. J Nucl Med. Sep 2015;56(9):1395–1400. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.134551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wimmi S, Balinovic A, Jeckel H. Dynamic relocalization of cytosolic type III secretion system components prevents premature protein secretion at low external pH. Nat Commun. Mar 12 2021;12(1):1625. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21863-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wang H, Avican K, Fahlgren A. Increased plasmid copy number is essential for yersinia T3SS function and virulence. Science. Jul 29 2016;353(6298):492–495. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Ohsawa S, Vaughen J, Igaki T. Cell extrusion: a stress-responsive force for good or evil in epithelial homeostasis. Dev Cell. Feb 5 2018;44(3):284–296. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Gudipaty SA, Rosenblatt J. Epithelial cell extrusion: pathways and pathologies. Semin Cell Dev Biol. Jul 2017;67:132–140. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jones BD, Ghori N, Falkow S. Salmonella typhimurium initiates murine infection by penetrating and destroying the specialized epithelial M cells of the peyer’s patches. J Exp Med. Jul 1 1994;180(1):15–23. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.1.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Rauch I, Deets KA, Ji DX. NAIP-NLRC4 Inflammasomes coordinate intestinal epithelial cell expulsion with eicosanoid and IL-18 release via activation of caspase-1 and −8. Immunity. Apr 18 2017;46(4):649–659. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M, Burridge K. Rho-stimulated contractility drives the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesions. J Cell Biol. Jun 1996;133(6):1403–1415. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.6.1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lessey EC, Guilluy C, Burridge K. From mechanical force to RhoA activation. Biochemistry. Sep 25 2012;51(38):7420–7432. doi: 10.1021/bi300758e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rosenblatt J, Raff MC, Cramer LP. An epithelial cell destined for apoptosis signals its neighbors to extrude it by an actin- and myosin-dependent mechanism. Curr Biol. Nov 27 2001;11(23):1847–1857. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00587-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Nanavati BN, Yap AS, Teo JL. Symmetry breaking and epithelial cell extrusion. Cells. Jun 7 2020;9(6). doi: 10.3390/cells9061416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wee K, Hediyeh-Zadeh S, Duszyc K. Snail induces epithelial cell extrusion by regulating RhoA contractile signalling and cell-matrix adhesion. J Cell Sci. Jul 6 2020;133(13). doi: 10.1242/jcs.235622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Duszyc K, Gomez GA, Lagendijk AK. Mechanotransduction activates RhoA in the neighbors of apoptotic epithelial cells to engage apical extrusion. Curr Biol. Feb 5 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bass DM, Trier JS, Dambrauskas R, Wolf JL. Reovirus type I infection of small intestinal epithelium in suckling mice and its effect on M cells. Lab Invest. Feb 1988;58(2):226–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chen YM, Helm ET, Groeltz-Thrush JM, Gabler NK, Burrough ER. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition of absorptive enterocytes and depletion of peyer’s patch M cells after PEDV infection. Virology. Jan 2 2021;552:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2020.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kimura S, Yamakami-Kimura M, Obata Y. Visualization of the entire differentiation process of murine M cells: suppression of their maturation in cecal patches. Mucosal Immunol. May 2015;8(3):650–660. doi: 10.1038/mi.2014.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Isberg RR, Leong JM. Multiple beta 1 chain integrins are receptors for invasin, a protein that promotes bacterial penetration into mammalian cells. Cell. Mar 9 1990;60(5):861–871. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90099-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Van Nhieu GT, Isberg RR. The yersinia pseudotuberculosis invasin protein and human fibronectin bind to mutually exclusive sites on the alpha 5 beta 1 integrin receptor. J Biol Chem. Dec 25 1991;266(36):24367–24375. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)54238-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kunimura K, Sakata D, Tun X. S100A4 Protein is essential for the development of mature microfold cells in peyer’s patches. Cell Rep. Nov 26 2019;29(9):2823–2834e7. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ding S, Song Y, KF B. Retinoic Acid and lymphotoxin signaling promote differentiation of human intestinal M cells. Gastroenterology. Jul 2020;159(1):214–226 e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, JM, upon reasonable request.


Articles from Gut Microbes are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES