Skip to main content
Respiratory Research logoLink to Respiratory Research
. 2021 Nov 20;22:299. doi: 10.1186/s12931-021-01894-7

Correction to: Measuring disease activity in COPD: is clinically important deterioration the answer?

Dave Singh 1,, Gerard J Criner 2, Ian Naya 3,4, Paul W Jones 3, Lee Tombs 5, David A Lipson 6,7, MeiLan K Han 8
PMCID: PMC8606091  PMID: 34801035

Correction to: Respir Res (2020) 21:134 10.1186/s12931-020-01387-z

The original version of the article unfortunately contained a mistake in the disclosure statement.

It has been corrected in this correction.

It should read as,

Disclosure section

The disclosure statement was incomplete, the correct statement is “MeiLan K Han received writing and research support from GlaxoSmithKline for this work. Outside this work, she also reports personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Merck and Mylan. She also reports research support from Novartis and Sunovion.”

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Reference

  • 1.Singh D, Criner GJ, Naya I, Jones PW, Tombs L, Lipson DA, Han MK. Measuring disease activity in COPD: is clinically important deterioration the answer? Respir Res. 2020;21:134. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01387-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Respiratory Research are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES