Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia logoLink to Indian Journal of Anaesthesia
editorial
. 2021 Oct 29;65(10):711–715. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_924_21

Advancing, strengthening and reshaping obstetric critical care with Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS)

Lalit Mehdiratta 1,, Nishant Kumar 1, Sukhminder Jit Singh Bajwa 2
PMCID: PMC8607862  PMID: 34898697

It has been hypothesised since the early 18th century by Spallanzani that sound beyond the reach of human ears is used by bats to navigate.[1] As with most other discoveries, this was first put to use for military purposes by the United States navy during the world wars. The first medical use came much later in the second half of the 20th century when Ian Donald used it for medical purposes in obstetrics and gynaecology. The first ultrasonography (USG) machines were developed in the 1950s, whereas limited, experimental use began not earlier than the 60s. It was in the 1970s that USG started being widely used for various clinical specialities, mainly as a diagnostic tool.[2]

It was the three 'Princes of Serendip' – La Grange, Abramowitz and Kestenbaum who introduced this technique to anaesthesiology by performing USG-guided supraclavicular blocks in complicated patients[1] with improved success rates and a decrease in complications in the late 70s and early 80s.

However, the main inroads in anaesthesiology have been made in the last one decade only. With the turn of the century, the application of USG expanded from the routine regional blocks and central venous catheterisation to perioperative and critical care.[3]

Apart from the usual and new blocks for limb surgeries being performed under vision,[4,5,6,7,8,9] with the diminishing size of the machine and better resolution, a whole armamentarium of fascial plane blocks and surrogate central neuraxial blocks such as paravertebral[10,11,12] and erector spinae plane blocks[13,14,15,16,17] are now available to the anaesthesiologists. Spinal,[18,19] epidural[20,21,22] and even caudal blocks[23] can now be performed under vision, especially in paediatrics.

In addition to that, the chest wall (pectoralis,[15,16,17] serratus anterior plane blocks[24,25]) and abdominal wall[26] (transversus abdominis,[27,28,29] quadratus lumborum,[30,31] rectus sheath blocks) plane blocks are now being routinely performed.

The application of USG in chronic pain cannot be over-emphasised. Chest radiogram and fluoroscopy, which have been the mainstay of diagnosis and therapeutics, have now been largely replaced by USG.

Recent studies have suggested the use of preoperative USG to ascertain residual gastric volume[32,33,34] in patients at high risk for aspiration. The conventional airway examination in the anticipated difficult airways and obese can be objectively assessed using USG with measurements of the tongue thickness, the submandibular space and even the vocal cord status.[35,36,37,38,39,40,41]

Choosing an appropriately sized endotracheal tube and passing an endotracheal tube through the vocal cords detected by the end-tidal carbon dioxide is now done under direct real time visualisation.[42,43,44,45,46] Difficult venous and arterial canulation, insertion of peripheral or central catheters are no longer dependent on the 'feel' of the vessel.[47,48,49,50,51,52]

Postoperative stridor, airway oedema, vocal cord movements, and epiglottic and tracheal anatomy can be directly visualised and are of importance in airway and neck procedures. Front of neck access is now no longer a blind procedure. Percutaneous tracheostomy under USG guidance is now the point of care in the intensive care unit (ICU) and emergency departments.[53]

Transoesophageal echocardiography is a boon to patients undergoing cardiac surgery or high-risk cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery in diagnosing various cardiac derangements and specific embolism intraoperatively.[54] Focussed cardiac ultrasound and comprehensive transthoracic cardiac ultrasound for preoperative assessment of suspected abnormalities in cardiac function (e.g., valvular heart disease, left ventricular dysfunction) or volume status provides valuable information.[55]

Point-of-Care ultrasound (POCUS) is the bedside utilisation of ultrasound in real-time to aid in the early diagnosis and treatment of patients. It is now considered as an extension of the physical examination and serves as a diagnostic adjunct to the treating physician. Unlike conventional ultrasound, it is a rapid, limited study performed at the bedside for a specific diagnosis or therapeutic outcome. POCUS is currently highly utilised by emergency physicians in North America.[56] Nevertheless, its application in the perioperative period is fast-increasing. A number of narrative reviews on the application of POCUS perioperatively have been recently published and all of them have portrayed that it has diverse clinical utility and great potential.[57,58] A recent editorial in the Indian Journal of Anaesthesia (IJA) has highlighted the need to adopt modern strategies to improve the quality of perioperative care.[59] The use of POCUS in the perioperative setting can be a welcome move in this direction.

With its ability to provide a peek in the body cavities and vessels, USG including POCUS is now an integral part of the management of critically ill patients in the emergency department and critical care unit as a valuable diagnostic and monitoring tool. Starting from the cranium, transcranial doppler (vascular sufficiency, cerebral perfusion pressure, vasospasm), optic nerve sheath diameter (intracranial pressure) and brain parenchyma status (midline shift) can be ascertained.[60]

Examination of the lung, which was primarily dependent on chest radiogram and computed tomography scan, has yielded way to bedside diagnosis and therapeutics by USG. Pneumonia, pneumothorax, pulmonary oedema, effusion and even extravascular lung water (EVLW) can be picked up by USG. Assessment of diaphragmatic function has further reduced the incidence of failure to wean from mechanical ventilation.[54]

Volume status can additionally be inferred from the examination of the vena cava and fluid therapy monitored.[54] A study in this issue is based on the prediction of postinduction hypotension in young adults using ultrasound-derived inferior vena cava parameters.[61] The utility of focussed assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) and inpatients with abdominal distension and shock cannot be overemphasised.[54]

POCUS is now the new kid on the block in obstetric critical care. A recent review concluded that POCUS can play an essential role in aspiration risk assessment, airway management, neuraxial anaesthesia, cardiorespiratory diagnosis and decision-making during pregnancy.[62] Another recently conducted observational study in critically ill parturients admitted in a resource-limited obstetric high dependency unit concluded that out of the 166 enroled parturients, 34% presented with respiratory distress, 21% had atleast one pulmonary complication detectable by lung ultrasonography and the incidence was higher in those with respiratory distress. The pulmonary complications that were seen included fluid overload, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pleural effusion, pneumonia and atelectasis. The physiological changes of pregnancy, preeclampsia, and puerperal cardiomyopathy predispose parturients to pulmonary oedema. The use of nifedipine, magnesium sulphate, acute kidney injury related to preeclampsia and iatrogenic fluid overload contribute to pulmonary congestion in the critically ill obstetric patient. Early detection of this congestion to guide fluid administration can prove useful in their clinical management.[63] This issue of the IJA has a systematic review and meta-analysis, wherein the authors have evaluated the role and ability of POCUS in the assessment of volume status and early detection of lung oedema in parturients with severe preeclampsia (SPE). The review concludes that POCUS can be a useful tool in the clinical management of the parturient with SPE to identify and grade the presence of EVLW before it clinically manifests, that is, lung ultrasound can detect subclinical pulmonary oedema and provide a window to the treating physician to prevent further deterioration.[64] POCUS in the hypertensive pregnant patient has some more applications. Measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter provides a surrogate to intracranial pressure management. In a convulsing patient, transcranial doppler and optic nerve sheath diameter monitoring can prevent further complications.[64] An interesting application of POCUS in the preclamptic parturient is depicted in another clinical communication published in this issue of the IJA. This communication cites a case of a preeclamptic parturient on magnesium sulphate who got sedated with loss of sensorium. Ultrasound imaging of the abdomen and pelvis in the ICU helped in the diagnosis in this case by depicting kidney abnormalities to be the cause of delayed excretion of magnesium. The resultant magnesium toxicity had led to altered sensorium.[65]

Despite the shackles of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (PNDT) act,[66] USG remains an invaluable tool in the armamentarium of the anaesthesiologists. With the newer compact, single, all-purpose probes (Butterfly, V-Scan), which can be connected to the smart phone or a tablet, it would not be wrong to say that the time is not far when USG would be the new stethoscope! Smartphone-based POCUS has been recently found to be reliable to detect free fluid in the abdominal cavity, the foetal heart-beat, foetal presentation and the assessment of gestational age in the parturient.[67] This smartphone may be used to detect and estimate the presence of EVLW to guide fluid management in the parturient in the days to come. Nevertheless, POCUS in obstetric critical care has its own share of concerns including barriers like the availability of portable and robust USG equipment for POCUS and the lack of confidence amongst intensivists and obstetricians in doing POCUS. The technique of imaging and the interpretation of the images require training and experience. Several authors, researchers and bodies have recommended the incorporation of ultrasound training in the teaching curriculum of undergraduate medical students and postgraduate students in Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Anaesthesiology.[68]

Most of the literature on POCUS in obstetric critical care is based on observational studies. It is said that the reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality and this hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the study. Furthermore, it is a fact that the quality and reliability of evidence generated from a systematic review are dependent on the quality of the studies that are included in the review.[69] Nonetheless, all the seven studies included in the systematic review published in this issue are observational studies. At this point, it is imperative to note that the design, implementation and reporting of observational studies require methodological and clinical expertise and reporting skills to minimise bias.[70] Neverthelesss, high quality observational studies/randomised controlled trials need to be published on this novel topic of the use of POCUS in obstetric critical care including preeclampsia. Ultrasound is the new 'Brahmastra' (powerful tool) of the anaesthesiologist and POCUS is the obstetric intensivist's new wand that is revolutionising and strengthening obstetric critical care and improving maternal outcomes. POCUS is currently without doubt the new lamp in the labour room and the obstetric critical care unit.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sette P, Dorizzi RM, Castellano G. Short history of US guided regional anaesthesia; from the bats to the Peripheral Nerve Block. Riv Ital Med Lab. 2010;6:224–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kendall JL, Hoffenberg SR, Smith SR. History of emergency and critical care ultrasound: The evolution of a new imaging paradigm. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:S126–30. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000260623.38982.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mariano ER, Marshall ZJ, Urman RD, Kaye AD. Ultrasound and its evolution in perioperative regional anesthesia and analgesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014;28:29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2013.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Saini S, Rao SM, Agrawal N, Gupta A. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of shoulder block versus interscalene block for postoperative analgesia in arthroscopic shoulder surgeries. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:451–7. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_110_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krishna V, Govil N, Tripathi M, Jain G, Goyal T, Aggarwal S. Comparison of adductor canal block with femoral nerve block for post-operative pain relief after bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:S80–5. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1317_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sivapurapu V, Bhat RR, Vani NI, Raajesh JI, Aruna S, Paulose DT. A cadaver study of four approaches of ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:624–30. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_920_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sivakumar RK, Panneerselvam S, Cherian A, Rudingwa P, Menon J. Perineural vs.intravenous dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to bupivacaine in ultrasound guided fascia iliaca compartment block for femur surgeries. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62:851–7. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_397_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chaudhary SK, Verma RK, Rana S, Singh J, Gupta B, Singh Y. Ultrasound-guided femoro-sciatic nerve block for post-operative analgesia after below knee orthopaedic surgeries under subarachnoid block. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60:484–90. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.186027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kumar A, Sharma D, Sibi ME, Datta B, Gogoi B. Comparison of peripheral nerve stimulator versus ultrasonography guided axillary block using multiple injection technique. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58:700–4. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.147138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Swathi KB, Kamal M, Kumar M, Kumar R, Chhabra S, Bhatia P. Comparison of analgesic efficacy of the conventional approach and mid-transverse process to pleura approach of the paravertebral block in video-assisted thoracoscopy surgeries. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:512–8. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_64_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.El Mourad MB, Amer AF. Effects of adding dexamethasone or ketamine to bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62:285–91. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_791_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Syal K, Chandel A. Comparison of the post-operative analgesic effect of paravertebral block, pectoral nerve block and local infiltration in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61:643–8. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_81_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ramachandran S, Ramaraj KP, Velayudhan S, Shanmugam B, Kuppusamy S, Lazarus SP. Comparison of erector spinae plane block and local anaesthetic infiltration of the incision site for postoperative analgesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy – A randomised parallel-group study. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:398–403. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1450_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sinha C, Kumar A, Kumar A, Kumari P, Singh JK, Jha CK. Deep versus superficial erector spinae block for modified radical mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:97–101. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_513_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shah SB, Chawla R, Pahade A, Mittal A, Bhargava AK, Kumar R. Comparison of pectoralis plane blocks with ketamine-dexmedetomidine adjuncts and opioid-based general anaesthesia in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:1038–46. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_8_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sinha C, Kumar A, Kumar A, Prasad C, Singh PK, Priya D. Pectoral nerve versus erector spinae block for breast surgeries. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63:617–22. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_163_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kumar S, Goel D, Sharma SK, Ahmad S, Dwivedi P, Deo N, et al. A randomised controlled study of the post-operative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block in the first 24 h after modified radical mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62:436–42. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_523_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ravi PR, Naik S, Joshi MC, Singh S. Real-time ultrasound-guided spinal anaesthesia vs pre– procedural ultrasound-guided spinal anaesthesia in obese patients. Indian J Anaesth May. 2021;65:356–61. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_446_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bajaj JS, Kane D. Ultrasound-guided subarachnoid block in a case of osteogenesis imperfecta in an adolescent girl presenting with femur fracture – A case report. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63:491–3. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_110_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jain K, Puri A, Taneja R, Jaiswal V, Jain A. Preprocedural ultrasound as an adjunct to blind conventional technique for epidural neuraxial blockade in patients undergoing hip or knee joint replacement surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63:924–31. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_327_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Khemka R, Rastogi S, Desai N, Chakraborty A, Sinha S. Comparison of ultrasound imaging in transverse median and parasagittal oblique planes for thoracic epidurals. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60:377–81. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.183398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mittal AK, Goel N, Chowdhury I, Shah SB, Singh BP, Jakhar P. Acoustic puncture assist device versus loss of resistance technique for epidural space identification. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60:330–6. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.181594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jain A, Barasker SK, Jain S, Waindeskar V. Correlation of correct needle placement in caudal epidural space and anatomical structures of sacral canal in paediatric patients. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:S74–9. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1599_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kumar V, Sirohiya P, Gupta N, Bharati SJ, Garg R, Mishra S. Effect of adding dexamethasone to ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:1032–7. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_261_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Khemka R, Chakraborty A. Ultrasound-guided modified serratus anterior plane block for perioperative analgesia in breast oncoplastic surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63:231–4. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_752_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Saxena R, Joshi S, Srivastava K, Tiwari S, Sharma N, Valecha UK. Comparative study of ultrasound-guided abdominal field blocks versus port infiltration in laparoscopic cholecystectomies for post-operative pain relief. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60:578–83. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.187790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Singla N, Garg K, Jain R, Malhotra A, Singh MR, Grewal A. Analgesic efficacy of dexamethasone versus dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative pain relief in caesarean section: A prospective randomised controlled study. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:S121–6. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_228_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gupta C, Valecha UK, Singh SP, Varshney M. Systemic lidocaine versus ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:31–6. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_430_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Suseela I, Anandan K, Aravind A, Kaniyil S. Comparison of ultrasound-guided bilateral subcostal transversus abdominis plane block and port-site infiltration with bupivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62:497–501. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_55_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sindwani G, Sahu S, Suri A, Sureka S, Thomas M. Efficacy of ultrasound guided quadratus lumborum block as postoperative analgesia in renal transplantation recipients. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:605–10. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_21_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Venkatraman R, Saravanan R, Mohana KV, Pushparani A. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block for post-operative analgesia in unilateral laparoscopic renal surgeries – A randomised controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:1007–11. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_335_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Doctor JR, Chandan P, Shetty N, Gala K, Ranganathan P. Ultrasound-guided assessment of gastric residual volume in patients receiving three types of clear fluids. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:289–94. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1291_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Garg H, Podder S, Bala I, Gulati A. Comparison of fasting gastric volume using ultrasound in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in elective surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:391–6. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_796_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sharma G, Mahankali S. Gastric ultrasound as a point of care tool. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63:162–3. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_5_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Daggupati H, Maurya I, Singh RD, Ravishankar M. Development of a scoring system for predicting difficult intubation using ultrasonography. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:187–92. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_702_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ohri R, Malhotra K. Different 2D ultrasound calculation methods to evaluate tongue volume for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:S193–7. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_843_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Koundal V, Rana S, Thakur R, Chauhan V, Ekke S, Kumar M. The usefulness of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in preanaesthetic airway assessment. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63:1022–8. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_492_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tripathy DK, Dhar M, Haran GH, Chauhan U. Airway management in a patient of Crouzon syndrome for maxillo-facial reconstructive surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63:409–10. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_864_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sivakumar RK, Mohan VK, Venkatachalapathy R, Kundra P. Ultrasonography as a novel airway assessment tool for preoperative dynamic airway evaluation in an anticipated difficult airway. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61:1023–5. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_556_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Reddy PB, Punetha P, Chalam KS. Ultrasonography - A viable tool for airway assessment. Indian J Anaesth. 2016;60:807–13. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.193660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kumar A, Sinha C, Kumar A, Singh AK, Vardhan H, Bhavana K, et al. Assessment of functionality of vocal cords using ultrasound before and after thyroid surgery. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62:599–602. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_197_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Makireddy R, Cherian A, Elakkumanan LB, Bidkar PU, Kundra P. Correlation between correctly sized uncuffed endotracheal tube and ultrasonographically determined subglottic diameter in paediatric population. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:103–8. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_619_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rajasekhar M, Moningi S, Patnaik S, Rao P. Correlation between ultrasound-guided subglottic diameter and little finger breadth with the outer diameter of the endotracheal tube in paediatric patients – A prospective observational study. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62:978–83. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_545_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Abhishek C, Munta K, Rao SM, Chandrasekhar CN. End-tidal capnography and upper airway ultrasonography in the rapid confirmation of endotracheal tube placement in patients requiring intubation for general anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61:486–9. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_544_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rajan S, Surendran J, Paul J, Kumar L. Rapidity and efficacy of ultrasonographic sliding lung sign and auscultation in confirming endotracheal intubation in overweight and obese patients. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61:230–4. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.202164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rajan S, Surendran J, Paul J, Kumar L. A prospective comparative study to evaluate the utility of lung ultrasonography to improve the accuracy of traditional clinical methods to confirm position of left sided double lumen tube in elective thoracic surgeries. Indian J Anaesth. 2015;59:476–81. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.162983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mageshwaran T, Singla D, Agarwal A, Kumar A, Tripathy DK, Agrawal S. Comparative efficacy of supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach of subclavian vein cannulation under ultrasound guidance. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:S69–73. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1316_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Prasad R, Soni S, Janweja S, Rajpurohit JS, Nivas R, Kumar J. Supraclavicular or infraclavicular subclavian vein: Which way to go- A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing catheterization dynamics using ultrasound guidance. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:292–8. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_930_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lal J, Bhardwaj M, Verma M, Bansal T. A prospective, randomised, comparative study to evaluate long axis, short axis and medial oblique axis approach for ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:193–8. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_785_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kumari P, Kumar A, Kumar A, Kumar N, Kumar A. Difficult central venous cannulation in Cushing's syndrome: Ultrasound-guided brachiocephalic vein cannulation to the rescue. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64:243–4. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_746_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kumar A, Sinha C, Kumar A, Kumar N, Singh JK. Ultrasound-guided left brachiocephalic vein cannulation. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63:327–8. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_801_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rastogi A, Agarwal A, Goyal P, Priya V, Dhiraaj S, Haldar R. Ultrasound guided internal jugular vein cannulation in infants: Comparative evaluation of novel modified short axis out of plane approach with conventional short axis out of plane approach. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62:208–13. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_676_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ravi PR, Vijai MN, Shouche S. Realtime ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy in emergency setting: The glass ceiling has been broken? Disaster Mil Med. 2017;3:7. doi: 10.1186/s40696-017-0035-x. doi: 10.1186/s40696-017-0035-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Elsherbiny M, Abdelwahab Y, Nagy K, Mannaa A, Hassabelnaby Y. Role of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac surgery: An observational study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7:2480–3. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ramsingh D, Bronshteyn YS, Haskins S, Zimmerman J. Perioperative point-of-care ultrasound. Anaesthesiology. 2020;132:908–16. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Collins K, Collins C, Kothari A. Point-of-Care ultrasound in obstetrics. AJUM. 2019;22:32–9. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li L, Yong RJ, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Perioperative point of care ultrasound (POCUS) for anaesthesiologists: An overview. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020;24:20. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-0847-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Naji A, Chappidi M, Ahmed A, Monga A, Sanders J. Perioperative point-of-care ultrasound use by anesthesiologists. Cureus. 2021;13:e15217. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bajwa SJS, Mehdiratta L. Adopting newer strategies of perioperative quality improvement: The bandwagon moves on…. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:639–43. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_866_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Bhatt R, Khanna P. Role of ultrasound in neurocritical care? [Last accessed on 2021 Oct 11];J Neuroanaesthesiol Crit Care. 2020 8:1–7. doi: 10.1055/ s-0040-1712069. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mohammed S, Syal R, Bhatia P, Chhabra S, Chouhan RS, Kamal M. Prediction of post-induction hypotension in young adults using ultrasound-derived inferior vena cava parameters: An observational study. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:731–7. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_1514_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.de Putte V, Lynn V, Stefaan B. Point-of-care ultrasound in pregnancy: gastric, airway, neuraxial, cardiorespiratory. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020;33:277–83. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Pisani L, Nicolo AD, Schiavone M, Adeniji AO, Palma AD, Gennaro FD, et al. Lung ultrasound for detection of pulmonary complications in critically ill obstetric patients in a resource-limited setting. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;104:478–86. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bajwa SJ, Kurdi MS, Sutagatti JG, Bajwa SK, Theerth KA. Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for the assessment of volume status and fluid management in patients with severe pre-eclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:716–30. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_820_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Saran S, Preethi A, Jamuda BK, Agrawal A. Utility of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for predicting risk of magnesium toxicity in critically ill pre-eclamptic patients. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65:760–2. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_698_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dhar M, Payal YS, Krishna V. The Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act and its implication on advancement of ultrasound in anaesthesiology; time to change mindsets rather than laws. Indian J Anaesth. 2018;62:930–3. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_518_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kodaira Y, Pisani L, Boyle S, Olumide S, Orsi M, Adeniji AO, et al. Reliability of ultrasound findings acquired with handheld apparatuses to inform urgent obstetric diagnosis in a high-volume resource-limited setting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;153:280–6. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Recker F, Weber E, Strizek B, Gembruch U, Westerway SC, Dietrich CF. Point-of-care ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303:871–6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-05972-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ma LL, Wang YY, Yang ZH, Huang D, Weng H, Zeng XT. Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment of tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better? Mil Med Res. 2020;7:7. doi: 10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Manchikanti L, Singh V, Smith HS, Hirsch JA. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 4: observational studies. Pain Physician. 2009;12:73–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Anaesthesia are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES