Abstract
Background
Approvals of cancer therapeutics are primarily disease entity specific. Current molecular diagnostic approaches frequently identify actionable alterations in rare cancers or rare subtypes of common cancers for which the corresponding treatments are not approved and unavailable within clinical trials due to entity-related eligibility criteria. Access may be negotiated with health insurances. However, approval rates vary, and critical information required for a scientific evaluation of treatment-associated risks and benefits is not systematically collected. Thus clinical trials with optimized patient selection and comprehensive molecular characterization are essential for translating experimental treatments into standard care.
Patients and methods
Continuous ReAssessment with Flexible ExTension in Rare Malignancies (CRAFT) is an open-label phase II trial for adults with pretreated, locally advanced, or metastatic solid tumors. Based on the evaluation by a molecular tumor board, patients are assigned to combinations of six molecularly targeted agents and a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antagonist within seven study arms focusing on (i) BRAF V600 mutations; (ii) ERBB2 amplification and/or overexpression, activating ERBB2 mutations; (iii) ALK rearrangements, activating ALK mutations; (iv and v) activating PIK3CA and AKT mutations, other aberrations predicting increased PI3K–AKT pathway activity; (vi) aberrations predicting increased RAF–MEK–ERK pathway activity; (vii) high tumor mutational burden and other alterations predicting sensitivity to PD-L1 inhibition. The primary endpoint is the disease control rate (DCR) at week 16; secondary and exploratory endpoints include the progression-free survival ratio, overall survival, and patient-reported outcomes. Using Simon’s optimal two-stage design, 14 patients are accrued for each study arm. If three or fewer patients achieve disease control, the study arm is stopped. Otherwise, 11 additional patients are accrued. If the DCR exceeds 7 of 25 patients, the null hypothesis is rejected for the respective study arm.
Conclusions
CRAFT was activated in October 2021 and will recruit at 10 centers in Germany.
Trial registration numbers
EudraCT: 2019-003192-18; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04551521.
Key words: precision oncology, clinical trial in progress, target therapy, immunotherapy
Highlights
-
•
Actionable genetic alterations are detected in many cancers with unknown efficacy of the corresponding targeted therapies.
-
•
CRAFT, an open-label multicenter phase II trial, uses six molecularly targeted agents and a PD-L1 antagonist in seven treatment arms.
-
•
Patient allocation to trial arms is based on evaluation of molecular tumor characteristics by the German Cancer Consortium.
-
•
The in-depth molecular characterization helps to understand mechanisms underlying primary and acquired therapy resistance.
-
•
The CRAFT trial has been active in Germany since October 2021 and will open at 10 sites during 2022.
Introduction
The cancer genome sequencing efforts of the past decades have led to the discovery of numerous molecularly targeted cancer therapies and associated predictive biomarkers1, 2, 3 and raised hopes that patient outcomes may be improved by comprehensive molecular characterization of individual tumors. The majority of mutations in ‘actionable’ cancer genes, however, were discovered through systematic studies of patient cohorts from common disease categories defined by conventional, histology-based diagnostic criteria, and previous precision oncology trials accordingly included mainly patients with common cancers.4, 5, 6 By contrast, the value of molecular profiling to guide therapeutic decisions in patients with rare cancers—for which there is no internationally agreed definition—is only beginning to emerge.7 Furthermore, many common cancers are now viewed as multiple, molecularly distinct diseases of the same organ. For example, ROS1 alterations in non-small-cell lung cancer,8,9 FGFR alterations in urothelial cancer,10 and NRG1 fusions in KRAS-wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma11,12 define molecular subsets of relatively common cancers for which targeted therapies are highly effective and thus can be regarded as rare cancers that require unique treatment. Given the abundance of rare cancers in a stricter sense, which account for ∼25% of all human neoplasms, and molecular subgroups of common cancers, optimized patient selection and comprehensive molecular analysis to understand mechanisms of response and resistance to targeted treatment are critical for improvement of patient outcomes.
The Molecularly Aided Stratification for Tumor Eradication Research (MASTER) program of the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg/Dresden, and the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) is a clinical platform for molecular stratification of younger adults with advanced-stage cancers across entities and patients with rare cancers across age groups based on whole-exome or genome and RNA sequencing.7,13 This approach enables, in a clinical setting, molecular profiling of all tumor types at a scale beyond that in initiatives such as Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry (TAPUR), Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH), or Tumor-Agnostic Precision Immuno-Oncology and Somatic Targeting Rationale for You (TAPISTRY), ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04589845.14,15 In conjunction with clinical data, such broad molecular analyses not only identify novel drug targets in common cancer types as outlined above, but also aid in identifying complex genetic relationships and biomarker profiles (molecular signatures) for prediction of therapy response within (i.e. histology-specific) and across major cancer types. Clinical evaluation of the molecular data generated in DKFZ/NCT/DKTK MASTER by a dedicated cross-institutional molecular tumor board (MTB) allows categorizing patients into distinct molecular intervention baskets, formulation and ranking of evidence-based treatment recommendations, and assignment of patients to genomics-guided clinical trials. At present, >3200 patients have been analyzed in DKFZ/NCT/DKTK MASTER; however, a key area for improvement concerns translating molecular findings into clinical action, with limited access to drugs and an inadequate number of molecularly stratified clinical trials being important obstacles.
Within Continuous ReAssessment with Flexible ExTension in Rare Malignancies, (CRAFT); EudraCT: 2019-003192-18; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04551521, we implemented seven different study arms to investigate targeted agents and immunotherapy, including—unlike TAPUR, MATCH, and TAPISTRY—rational combinations, in molecularly defined patient populations. Consistently, all treatment arms are evaluated using the same endpoint, that is, the disease control rate (DCR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), and a uniform biometrical, adaptive phase II approach. The two key components of CRAFT are (i) the broad molecular characterization of individual tumors linked to clinical outcome data, which will be used to better identify responders and nonresponders and understand mechanisms underlying primary and acquired therapy resistance, and (ii) the individual evaluation of each tumor’s molecular characteristics by an MTB.
Patients and methods
Trial design and treatment
CRAFT is an open-label, multicenter phase II trial designed to investigate the antitumor activity of seven treatment regimens matching the molecular tumor profiles in adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid cancers. Molecular eligibility will be evaluated by the DKFZ/NCT/DKTK MTB based on analyses performed within DKFZ/NCT/DKTK MASTER (whole-exome or genome and RNA sequencing)7 or in an accredited laboratory (e.g. gene panel sequencing). Eligible patients will be assigned to the following treatment arms (Figure 1): (i) vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily) and cobimetinib (60 mg once daily for 21 days in a 28-day cycle) for 28 days (run-in phase), followed by vemurafenib (720 mg twice daily), cobimetinib (60 mg once daily for 21 days in a 28-day cycle), and atezolizumab (840 mg every 2 weeks); (ii) trastuzumab (8 mg per kilogram of body weight as a loading dose, followed by 6 mg per kilogram every 3 weeks), pertuzumab (840 mg as a loading dose, followed by 420 mg intravenously every 3 weeks), and atezolizumab (1200 mg every 3 weeks); (iii) alectinib (600 mg twice daily); (iv) ipatasertib (400 mg once daily for 21 days in a 28-day cycle) and atezolizumab (1200 mg in the first cycle, followed by 840 mg every 3 weeks); (v) ipatasertib (400 mg once daily for 21 days in a 28-day cycle) and atezolizumab (1200 mg in the first cycle, followed by 840 mg every 3 weeks) combined with docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel according to European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved indication; (vi) cobimetinib (60 mg once daily for 21 days in a 28-day cycle) and atezolizumab (840 mg every 2 weeks); and (vii) atezolizumab (1200 mg every 3 weeks). Benefiting patients may continue study treatment.
Figure 1.
Pathways and study arms of the CRAFT trial.
Molecular eligibility is determined by the DKFZ/NCT/DKTK MTB. Representative examples of eligible molecular alterations include BRAF V600E/K mutations (Arm 1/BRAF); ERBB2 amplification and/or overexpression, activating ERBB2 mutations (Arm 2/ERBB2); ALK rearrangements, activating ALK mutations, alternative ALK transcription initiation, RET rearrangements (Arm 3/ALK); activating PIK3CA mutations, activating AKT mutations, other alterations predicting increased PI3K–AKT pathway activity, for example, PTEN loss, AKT amplification (Arms 4 and 5); alterations other than BRAF V600E/K predicting increased RAF–MEK–ERK pathway activity, for example, BRAF rearrangements, activating MEK mutations (Arm 6/MAPK); high tumor mutational burden, alterations predicting sensitivity to PD-L1 inhibition, for example, DNA mismatch repair deficiency, PD-L1 amplification, PD-L1 overexpression (Arm 7/Immune evasion).
CRAFT, Continuous ReAssessment with Flexible ExTension in Rare Malignancies; DKFZ, German Cancer Research Center; DKTK, German Cancer Consortium; MASTER, Molecularly Aided Stratification for Tumor Eradication Research; MTB, molecular tumor board; NCT, National Center for Tumor Diseases.
The investigational medicinal products used in the CRAFT study are approved for other indications as single agents (vemurafenib, cobimetinib, atezolizumab, trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and alectinib) and combination therapies (vemurafenib/cobimetinib and trastuzumab/pertuzumab) or are in late clinical development with expected approval in the near future (ipatasertib). Thus, the side-effects of these investigational medicinal products and their management are well known. Furthermore, combinations of targeted agents and the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab are studied in several clinical trials, for example, vemurafenib/cobimetinib and atezolizumab in melanoma (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02902029, NCT03625141, NCT02908672);16 trastuzumab/pertuzumab and atezolizumab in breast cancer (NCT03417544, NCT03125928, NCT03199885); ipatasertib and atezolizumab in breast cancer and across entities (NCT03800836, NCT03673787); and cobimetinib and atezolizumab in breast cancer, rare cancers, various solid tumors, lung cancer, and melanoma (NCT03566485, NCT03108131, NCT03264066, NCT03600701, NCT03273153). Within these ongoing trials, no new safety signals have been reported so far. We therefore expect that the combination therapies applied in CRAFT will be safe and tolerable.
Patient population
Adult patients refractory or intolerant to at least one standard medical cancer treatment with molecular tumor characteristics deemed targetable by the DKFZ/NCT/DKTK MTB are eligible for inclusion in the trial. Examples of molecular abnormalities suitable for the different study arms are given in Figure 1. Key clinical inclusion and general exclusion criteria are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Key eligibility criteria
Key inclusion criteriaa
|
Key exclusion criteriaa
|
Complete eligibility criteria: www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04551521.
Patients may be included based on the analysis of archived tissue not older than 3 months following discussion with the principal investigator and/or the clinical coordinator.
Endpoints and assessments
The primary endpoint of the CRAFT trial is the DCR according to RECIST v1.1, including complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) as determined by investigator’s assessment, at day 110 (±5) of treatment, that is, after five 21-day cycles or four 28-day cycles. Imaging will be performed at baseline, at week 8, and at week 16. Secondary endpoints are the progression-free survival (PFS) ratio and the rate of adverse events and severe adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE v5.0). Exploratory endpoints include PFS, the modified PFS ratio,17 overall survival, and tumor response rate, that is, CR and PR, at day 110 (±5) of treatment according to RECIST v1.1. Additional exploratory endpoints include patient-reported outcomes, as assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life and fatigue questionnaires (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-FA12, respectively), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Patient Health Questionnaire for Anxiety and Depression, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function questionnaire. Collateral research includes collecting liquid biopsy samples at every treatment cycle for measurement of circulating tumor DNA and correlation with radiologic response and the option of a new tumor biopsy and multilayered molecular analysis in case of progression.
Sample size and statistical analysis
All study arms are based on the same biometrical assumptions with a DCR ≤0.2 under the null hypothesis and ≥0.45 for the alternative hypothesis. The sample size and power calculations are based on Simon’s optimal two-stage design18 for each study arm and all strata in the stratified arm separately. Type I and II errors are each set at 10%. Here, the null hypothesis that the true DCR is less than or equal to p0 = 0.20 will be tested against a one-sided alternative, where the desired level of response is p1 = 0.45. In each study arm, 25 patients evaluable for the primary endpoint are planned. In the first stage, n1 = 14 patients will be accrued. If there are r1 = 3 or fewer patients with at least SD, the respective study arm will be stopped. Otherwise, 11 additional patients will be accrued for a total of n = 25 patients, applied in each study arm separately. The entire study’s sample size will depend on the sample sizes achieved in the different study arms (minimum, n = 98; maximum, n = 175). In addition, the study aims to reduce the cumulative hazard of the PFS interval observed within the study (PFS2) compared with the cumulative hazard of the PFS interval experienced with the last systemic treatment before inclusion into the study (PFS1). This will be tested using the paired log-rank test.19
Results and discussion
CRAFT is a phase II trial evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of entity-informed, genomics- and transcriptomics-guided treatment in adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid cancers. Combining seven different targeted therapy regimens with a multilayered molecular diagnostics platform will allow for the evaluation of predictive markers for response or resistance. In addition, the systematic collection of patient-reported outcomes will generate a unique dataset with the potential for further refinement of the treatments regarding quality-of-life measures. The study was approved by authorities and the central ethics committee in July 2021 and will be conducted at ≥10 sites across Germany. We anticipate that our findings will contribute to establishing broad molecular diagnostics as an integral component of future clinical trials of targeted cancer treatments.
Acknowledgments
Funding
This trial is supported by the NCT Proof-of-Concept Clinical Trial Program and the NCT Molecular Precision Oncology Program. Study drugs are provided free of charge by Roche Pharma AG.
Disclosure
AV reports speaker, consultancy, and advisory role for Amgen, Roche, Bayer, Sanofi, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, EISAI, AstraZeneca, Merck, Incyte, Ipsen, Pierre Fabre, MSD, Sirtex, BTG, Servier, Terumo, and GSK. AD reports consulting for or advisory board membership with Bayer, Roche, BMS, MSD, Takeda, Janssen-Cilag; as well as travel or accommodation expenses from Celgene. GB reports consulting for or advisory board membership with AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche, and Pfizer; research associations with Roche and MSD; and travel funds from BMS, MSD, and Roche. AS reports sitting on the Advisory Board/Speaker’s Bureau of Aignostics, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, AGCT, Bayer, BMS, Eli Lilly, Illumina, Incyte, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, and Thermo Fisher; Research funding from Bayer, BMS, Chugai, and Incyte. KS reports honorary, partly with travel expenses, from Adviva, Audi, Pierre Fabre, Preventon, Swiss Group for Clinical Research, and Takeda. DJ reports consulting or advisory role for Roche/Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb, BioNTech AG, and Amgen. CH reports consulting for or advisory board membership with Boehringer Ingelheim; honoraria from Roche and Novartis; and research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim. SF: reports consulting for or advisory board membership with Bayer, Illumina, and Roche; honoraria from Amgen, Eli Lilly, PharmaMar, and Roche; research funding from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, PharmaMar, and Roche; travel or accommodation expenses from Amgen, Eli Lilly, Illumina, PharmaMar, and Roche. RFS reports consulting for or advisory board membership with Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Astellas, and Novartis; research funding from PharmaMar, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi Sankyo; travel, accommodations, and expenses covered by Daiichi Sankyo. All others have declared no conflicts of interest.
Ethics statement
The trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of Heidelberg University (protocol number AFmu-070/2021).
References
- 1.International Cancer Genome Consortium, Hudson T.J., Anderson W., et al. International network of cancer genome projects. Nature. 2010;464(7291):993–998. doi: 10.1038/nature08987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Consortium P., Yuan Y., Ju Y.S., et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of mitochondrial genomes in human cancers. Nat Genet. 2020;52:342–352. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0557-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chang K., Creighton C.J., Davis C., et al. The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project. Nat Genet. 2013;45(10):1113–1120. doi: 10.1038/ng.2764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tourneau C.L., Delord J.-P., Gonçalves A., et al. Molecularly targeted therapy based on tumour molecular profiling versus conventional therapy for advanced cancer (SHIVA): a multicentre, open-label, proof-of-concept, randomised, controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(13):1324–1334. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00188-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rodon J., Soria J.C., Berger R., et al. Genomic and transcriptomic profiling expands precision cancer medicine: the WINTHER trial. Nat Med. 2019;25(5):751–758. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0424-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Massard C., Michiels S., Ferte C., et al. High-throughput genomics and clinical outcome in hard-to-treat advanced cancers: results of the MOSCATO 01 Trial. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(6):586–595. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-1396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Horak P., Heining C., Kreutzfeldt S., et al. Comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic analysis for guiding therapeutic decisions in patients with rare cancers. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(11):2780–2795. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shaw A.T., Ou S.-H.I., Bang Y.-J., et al. Crizotinib in ROS1-rearranged non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(21):1963–1971. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Drilon A., Siena S., Ou S.I., et al. Safety and antitumor activity of the multitargeted Pan-TRK, ROS1, and ALK inhibitor entrectinib: combined results from two phase I trials (ALKA-372-001 and STARTRK-1) Cancer Discov. 2017;7(4):400–409. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-1237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Loriot Y., Necchi A., Park S.H., et al. Erdafitinib in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(4):338–348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Heining C., Horak P., Uhrig S., et al. NRG1 fusions in KRAS wild-type pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(9):1087–1095. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Laskin J., Liu S.V., Tolba K., et al. NRG1 fusion-driven tumors: biology, detection and the therapeutic role of afatinib and other ErbB-targeting agents. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(12):1693–1703. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Horak P., Klink B., Heining C., et al. Precision oncology based on omics data: the NCT Heidelberg experience. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(5):877–886. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mangat P.K., Halabi S., Bruinooge S.S., et al. Rationale and design of the Targeted Agent and Profiling Utilization Registry study. JCO Precis Oncol. 2018;2018(2):1–14. doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Flaherty K.T., Gray R.J., Chen A.P., et al. Molecular landscape and actionable alterations in a genomically guided cancer clinical trial: National Cancer Institute Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(33):3883–3894. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gutzmer R., Stroyakovskiy D., Gogas H., et al. Atezolizumab, vemurafenib, and cobimetinib as first-line treatment for unresectable advanced BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma (IMspire150): primary analysis of the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10240):1835–1844. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30934-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mock A., Heilig C.E., Kreutzfeldt S., et al. Community-driven development of a modified progression-free survival ratio for precision oncology. ESMO Open. 2019;4(6):e000583. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10(1):1–10. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jung S.-H. Rank tests for matched survival data. Lifetime Data Anal. 1999;5(1):67–79. doi: 10.1023/a:1009635201363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]