Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2021 Nov 23;15(11):e0009913. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009913

Presenting symptoms of leprosy at diagnosis: Clinical evidence from a cross-sectional, population-based study

Xiaohua Chen 1,2, Shun Zha 3, Tie-Jun Shui 3,*
Editor: Carlos Franco-Paredes4
PMCID: PMC8610243  PMID: 34813585

Abstract

Background

Leprosy is associated with different dermatologic and neurologic manifestations within a wide clinical spectrum, causing a great diagnostic challenge. Therefore, we aimed to examine associations between common presenting symptoms of leprosy and stage at diagnosis.

Methodology/Principal findings

In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed population-level data from the Leprosy Management Information System (LEPMIS) in Yunnan, China, from 2010–2020 and enrolled patients with newly detected leprosy. The data of 2125 newly detected leprosy patients, with 5000 symptoms, were analyzed. Numbness (828/5000, 16.56%), erythema (802/5000, 16.04%), Painless nor pruritic skin lesions (651/5000, 13.02%), eyebrow hair loss (467/5000, 9.34%), and tubercles (442/5000, 8.84%) were common symptoms of leprosy. The symptoms related to skin (1935/2533, 76.39%) and leprosy reaction (279/297, 93.94%) were mainly existed in MB group. While the symptoms related to disability (263/316, 83.49%), clinical feature (38/56, 69.09%), and facial features (19/23, 82.61%) were predominantly presented in delayed diagnostic group. Despite low proportions, formic sensation (99/5000, 1.98%), pain (92/5000, 1.84%), pruritus (56/5000, 1.12%), finger contracture (109/5000, 2.18%), muscle atrophy (71/5000, 1.42%), and motor dysfunction (18/5000, 0.36%) were reported during the diagnosis of leprosy. The proportions of skin, skin and nerve, and nerve symptoms as initial symptoms were 33.25%, 44.95%, and 21.80% and as only symptoms were 28.66%, 57.81%, and 13.91%, respectively. In those with physical disability, nerve symptoms were the most frequent symptoms (57.65% and 65.36% for the initial and only symptoms, respectively) compared with skin and skin and nerve symptoms. In the delayed diagnosis group, nerve symptoms were the most frequent symptoms (15.73% and 17.25%) and were associated with the longest diagnostic intervals (mean±SD: 38.88±46.02 and 40.35±49.36 months for initial and only symptoms, respectively) when compared with skin and skin and nerve symptoms.

Conclusions

Understanding the nature of presenting symptoms and developing symptom awareness campaigns would improve the level of leprosy awareness in the community. As nerve symptoms were related to a higher proportion of physical disability and longer diagnosis interval, we should increase awareness about nerve symptoms. Individuals with nerve symptoms should be considered the target group. Neurology outpatient visits may provide potential screening opportunities, and holding focused training for specialized neurology medical staff would enhance the capacity of the health system to recognize leprosy early.

Author summary

Early diagnosis is key in leprosy control; however, the diagnosis of leprosy is still challenging. In this study, we reviewed the common and rare symptoms of leprosy. Numbness, erythema, painless nor pruritic skin lesions, eyebrow hair loss, and tubercles were common symptoms of leprosy. Despite low proportions, formic sensation, pain, pruritus, finger contracture, muscle atrophy, and motor dysfunction were also reported by leprosy patients. As initial symptoms at symptom onset and only symptoms at diagnosis, nerve symptoms were associated with a greater degree of physical disability and a longer diagnosis interval than skin and skin and nerve symptoms. Understanding the presenting symptoms in detail would improve the level of leprosy awareness in the community. Increasing awareness of nerve symptoms, focusing on individuals with nerve symptoms at neurology outpatient visits, and holding focused training for medical staff specializing in neurology would enhance the capacity of the health system to recognize leprosy early.

Introduction

Leprosy is a chronic granulomatous infectious disease caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae), an intracytoplasmic parasite of macrophages and Schwann cells. Depending on the immunologic status of the host, the clinical picture can range from localized to disseminated and self-limiting to progressive. The disease primarily affects the superficial peripheral nervous system and the skin, but it may also involve the upper respiratory tract mucosa, anterior chambers of the eyes, bones, and testes [1].

Although the prevalence and incidence rates for leprosy have been significantly reduced as a result of the control strategies of the World Health Organization (WHO), new cases still occur [1]. Every year, >200,000 new leprosy cases are registered globally. This number has been fairly stable over the past several years [2]. A total of 202,185 new cases were reported from 160 countries in 2019, corresponding to the global new-case detection rate of 25.9 per one million population, with 10,813 leprosy cases associated with grade 2 disability (G2D) at diagnosis globally. The proportion of G2D cases among new cases was 5.3%, corresponding to 1.7 per one million population.

Early diagnosis and prompt treatment of all new cases of leprosy with multidrug therapy (MDT) remain the key strategies for leprosy control [3]. However, as one of the great imitators, the disease exhibits different dermatologic and neurologic manifestations within a wide clinical spectrum, which causes a great diagnostic challenge [1]. Delayed diagnosis of leprosy has been reported globally [46].

As early diagnosis minimizes damage and disability, early symptoms need to be recognized to prevent long-term sequelae associated with irreversible nerve damage [6]. However, the presenting symptoms of leprosy, especially those associated with different diagnostic intervals, have not been described in detail. In this study, we therefore aimed to examine associations between common presenting symptoms of leprosy, different classifications of leprosy, and different diagnostic intervals using data from a population-based cohort of patients with incident leprosy.

Methods

Ethics statement

Ethical approval for this study was obtained by the ethics committee of the Yunnan CDC, Yunnan, China. The data extracted from LEPMIS, which is anonymous without individually identifying data. Individual identifying information was not available and therefore not used.

Study design

For this cross-sectional, population-based study, we analyzed data of patients included in the Leprosy Management Information System (LEPMIS) in Yunnan, China, from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. Trained staff and/or experienced clinicians enter basic information about the disease and the medical data of patients into the database. The data were collated by Yunnan Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Participants

Yunnan, China, bears a significant leprosy burden. The characteristics and types of included patients were representative of a leprosy cohort in contemporary China. Our study was restricted by available data for newly detected leprosy cases, including patients’ basic demographic information (sex, date of birth, and ethnicity) and clinical information (age at confirmed diagnosis, date of symptom onset, date of confirmed diagnosis, duration from symptom onset to confirmed diagnosis, chief complaint, leprosy reaction, grade of physical impairment, Ridley–Jopling classification, and WHO operational classification).

Newly detected leprosy cases were diagnosed by medical staff specializing in leprosy and verified by the Yunnan Province CDC. Leprosy diagnosis was established based on clinical signs and symptoms, skin smears, skin biopsies, and neurophysiologic examinations. The leprosy patients were classified into the following groups based on the Ridley–Jopling [7] classification: tuberculoid (TT), borderline-tuberculoid (BT), borderline-borderline (BB), borderline-lepromatous (BL), and lepromatous (LL) groups and indeterminate (I). Leprosy patients were also classified as multibacillary (MB) or paucibacillary (PB) according to the WHO operational classification [8].

Procedures

For data analysis in this study, leprosy patients were divided into MB and PB groups. The study population was stratified by diagnostic intervals: early diagnosis and delayed diagnosis. The term “early detection” was used if the time between disease onset and diagnosis was within 2 years and the patient had grade 0 or grade 1 disability according to the WHO definition of leprosy-associated disability [8]. “Delayed diagnosis” was defined as a duration between disease onset and diagnosis of more than 2 years and/or grade 2 disability according to the WHO definition of leprosy-associated disability [8]. Information about presenting symptoms was extracted from chief complaint data. In terms of initial symptoms and only symptoms, the symptoms were divided into “skin symptoms”, “skin and nerve symptoms”, and “nerve symptoms”.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis involved comparisons of demographic data and symptoms among groups. The chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were utilized to compare distributions of categorical variables between groups. The t test was used for continuous variables. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software version 5.0 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), and statistical significance was assessed at the 0.05 level.

Results

Characteristics of newly detected leprosy patients

During the eleven-year study period from 2010 to 2020, 2252 records of leprosy cases in Yunnan, China, were retrieved; 117 records were excluded because they were relapsed, imported, or revisited cases, and 10 records were excluded because they were missing chief complaint information (Fig 1). As early diagnosis and delayed diagnosis are related to the grade of physical disability due to leprosy, 56 records were excluded due to a lack of a physical disability grade in the early and delayed diagnosis analysis.

Fig 1. Study Population.

Fig 1

A total of 2125 new cases of leprosy were identified; 698 (32.85%) occurred in females, 1174 (55.25%) occurred in patients belonging to a ethnic minority, 1771 (83.34%) occurred in people between 15 and 59 years of age, 1830 (86.12%) occurred in farmers, 1534 (72.19%) occurred in married individuals, and 1969 (92.66%) occurred in those with an incomplete high school education (Table 1).

Table 1. Basic Characteristics of the Newly Detected Leprosy Cases Enrolled in This Study in Yunnan, China from 2010–2020.

Leprosy (n,%) MB (n,%) PB (n,%) P value (MB vs PB) Early diagnosis (n,%) Delayed diagnosis (n,%) P value (Early vs Delayed)
Total 2125 100,00% 1393 65,55% 732 34,45% 1249 58,78% 820 38,59%
Gender Male 1427 67,15% 944 67,77% 483 65,98% 0,405 819 65,57% 567 69,15% 0,0945
Female 698 32,85% 449 32,23% 249 34,02% 430 34,43% 253 30,85%
Age Median (IQR), y 40 (29–52) 39 (29–50.5) 42 (29–56) 0.0079* 38 (27–49) 44 (32–56) <0.0001*
Mean(Min-Max) 41.13±16.07 (4–89) 40.43±15.18 (9–89) 42.37±17.49 (4–88) 38.76±15.45 (4–89) 44.47±16.19 (9–88)
Age group <15 years 60 2,82% 23 1,65% 37 5,05% <0.0001* 50 4,00% 8 0,98% <0.0001*
15–19 years 125 5,88% 82 5,89% 43 5,87% 83 6,65% 40 4,88%
20–29 years 374 17,60% 268 19,24% 106 14,48% 248 19,86% 117 14,27%
30–39 years 472 22,21% 337 24,19% 135 18,44% 295 23,62% 166 20,24%
40–49 years 454 21,36% 309 22,18% 145 19,81% 266 21,30% 176 21,46%
50–59 years 346 16,28% 209 15,00% 137 18,72% 176 14,09% 163 19,88%
60–69 years 192 9,04% 106 7,61% 86 11,75% 93 7,45% 90 10,98%
70–79 years 89 4,19% 53 3,80% 36 4,92% 34 2,72% 51 6,22%
≥80 years 13 0,61% 6 0,43% 7 0,96% 4 0,32% 9 1,10%
Ethnics Han 951 44,75% 662 47,52% 289 39,48% <0.0001* 512 40,99% 418 50,98% <0.0001*
Hui 8 0,38% 3 0,22% 5 0,68% 3 0,24% 5 0,61%
Tibetan 19 0,89% 15 1,08% 4 0,55% 9 0,72% 10 1,22%
Miao 307 14,45% 127 9,12% 180 24,59% 219 17,53% 84 10,24%
Yi 289 13,60% 176 12,63% 113 15,44% 174 13,93% 108 13,17%
Zhuang 164 7,72% 100 7,18% 64 8,74% 109 8,73% 50 6,10%
Man 1 0,05% 1 0,07% 0 0,00% 1 0,08% 0 0,00%
Yao 16 0,75% 12 0,86% 4 0,55% 12 0,96% 4 0,49%
Bai 44 2,07% 28 2,01% 16 2,19% 22 1,76% 22 2,68%
Hani 44 2,07% 37 2,66% 7 0,96% 29 2,32% 13 1,59%
Dai 113 5,32% 75 5,38% 38 5,19% 75 6,00% 34 4,15%
Lisu 45 2,12% 32 2,30% 13 1,78% 45 3,60% 24 2,93%
Wa 9 0,42% 7 0,50% 2 0,27% 2 0,16% 6 0,73%
Lahu 93 4,38% 66 4,74% 27 3,69% 46 3,68% 35 4,27%
Naxi 7 0,33% 6 0,43% 1 0,14% 5 0,40% 2 0,24%
Jingpo 6 0,24% 5 0,36% 1 0,14% 4 0,32% 2 0,24%
Bulang 2 0,09% 2 0,14% 0 0,00% 1 0,08% 1 0,12%
Achang 1 0,05% 1 0,07% 0 0,00% 1 0,08% 0 0,00%
Pumi 1 0,05% 1 0,07% 0 0,00% 0 0,00% 0 0,00%
De’Ang 1 0,05% 1 0,07% 0 0,00% 1 0,08% 0 0,00%
Jinuo 2 0,09% 0 0,00% 2 0,27% 2 0,16% 0 0,00%
Other 2 0,09% 2 0,14% 0 0,00% 1 0,08% 0 0,00%
Occupation Nursery child 2 0,09% 0 0,00% 2 0,27% 0.0146* 1 0,08% 0 0,00% 0.0085*
Children 2 0,09% 1 0,07% 1 0,14% 2 0,16% 0 0,00%
Student 115 5,41% 62 4,45% 53 7,24% 90 7,21% 24 2,93%
Teacher 9 0,42% 7 0,50% 2 0,27% 5 0,40% 4 0,49%
Food and beverage industry 1 0,05% 1 0,07% 0 0,00% 1 0,08% 0 0,00%
Public place attendant 2 0,09% 0 0,00% 2 0,27% 2 0,16% 0 0,00%
Business Services 5 0,24% 3 0,22% 2 0,27% 5 0,40% 0 0,00%
Medical staff 1 0,05% 1 0,07% 0 0,00% 1 0,08% 0 0,00%
Worker 26 1,22% 18 1,29% 8 1,09% 14 1,12% 12 1,46%
Farmer labourer 42 1,98% 34 2,44% 8 1,09% 24 1,92% 36 4,39%
Farmer 1830 86,12% 1202 86,29% 628 85,79% 1054 84,39% 705 85,98%
Herdsman 2 0,09% 0 0,00% 2 0,27% 2 0,16% 0 0,00%
Seafarers and long-distance drivers 3 0,14% 3 0,22% 0 0,00% 1 0,08% 2 0,24%
Clerks 6 0,28% 4 0,29% 2 0,27% 4 0,32% 2 0,24%
Retired 16 0,75% 11 0,79% 5 0,68% 10 0,80% 6 0,73%
Housework and unemployment 33 1,55% 23 1,65% 10 1,37% 17 1,36% 16 1,95%
others 15 0,71% 9 0,65% 6 0,82% 5 0,40% 9 1,10%
Technical personnel 1 0,05% 1 0,07% 0 0,00% 1 0,08% 0 0,00%
Self employed 12 0,56% 11 0,79% 1 0,14% 8 0,64% 4 0,49%
Unknown 2 0,09% 0 0,00% 2 0,27% 2 0,16% 0 0,00%
Education College education 49 2,31% 36 2,58% 13 1,78% 0,0519 30 2,40% 19 2,32% 0,1463
Senior high school 81 3,81% 62 4,45% 19 2,60% 53 4,24% 28 3,41%
Junior high school 629 29,60% 425 30,51% 204 27,87% 392 31,39% 220 26,83%
Primary school 876 41,22% 569 40,85% 307 41,94% 509 40,75% 346 42,20%
Illiteracy 460 21,65 282 20,24% 178 24,32% 248 19,86% 195 23,78%
Preschool 4 0,19% 16 1,15% 4 0,55% 3 0,24% 0 0,00%
Missing data 26 1,32% 19 1,36% 10 1,37% 14 1,12% 12 1,46%
Marriage Unmarried 453 21,32% 301 21,61% 152 20,77% 0,836 300 24,02% 142 17,32%
Married 1534 72,19% 1003 72,00% 531 72,54% 881 70,54% 612 74,63%
Widowed 75 3,53% 49 3,52% 26 3,55% 34 2,72% 38 4,63%
Divorce 46 2,16% 31 2,23% 15 2,05% 24 1,92% 21 2,56%
Unknown 17 0,80% 9 0,65% 8 1,09% 10 0,80% 7 0,85%
Leprosy classification
Ridley and Jopling I 28 1,32% 0 0,00% 28 3,83% <0.0001* 13 1,04% 14 1,71% <0.0001*
TT 202 9,46% 0 0,00% 201 27,46% 95 7,61% 104 12,68%
BT 503 23,67% 0 0,00% 503 68,72% 282 22,58% 215 26,22%
BB 197 9,27% 197 14,14% 0 0,00% 131 10,49% 62 7,56%
BL 912 42,92% 912 65,47% 0 0,00% 570 45,64% 311 37,93%
LL 283 13,36% 284 20,39% 0 0,00% 158 12,65% 114 13,90%
WHO** PB 732 34,45% 0 0,00% 732 100,00% <0.0001* 390 31,22% 333 40,61% <0.0001*
MB 1393 65,55% 1393 100,00% 0 0,00% 859 68,78% 487 59,39%
Leprosy reactions Total 285 13,41% 225 16,15% 60 8,20% <0.0001* 176 14,09% 86 10,49%
T1R 121 5,69% 71 5,10% 51 6,97% 80 6,41% 37 4,51%
T2R 122 5,74% 115 8,26% 6 0,82% 66 5,28% 46 5,61%
Mixed 42 1,98% 39 2,80% 3 0,41% 30 2,40% 8 0,98%
Physical disability Grade 0 1329 62,54% 926 66,48% 403 55,05% <0.0001* 1040 83,27% 289 35,24% <0.0001*
Grade 1 325 15,29% 230 16,51% 95 12,98% 209 16,73% 116 14,15%
Grade 2 415 19,53% 190 13,64% 225 30,74% 0 0,00% 415 50,61%
Missing data 56 2,64% 47 3,37% 9 1,23% 0 0,00% 0 0,00%
Diagnosis intervals Early Diagnosis 1249 58,78% 859 61,67% 390 53,28% <0.0001* 1249 100,00% 0 0,00% <0.0001*
Delayed Diagnosis 820 38,59% 487 34,96% 333 45,49% 0 0,00% 820 100,00%
Missing data 56 2,64% 47 3,37% 9 1,23% 0 0,00% 0 0,00%
Duration from Symptom onset to clinical confirmation, Median (IQR) 20 (29–52) 21 (17–26) 20 (17–30) 0,0611 18 (16–21) 34 (25–56) <0.0001*
Mean±SD (Min-Max) 29.54±33.57 (1–364) 28.56±31.7 (1–361) 31.43±36.83 (1–364) 17.29±5.135 (1–23) 48.68±47.46 (1–364)

I: inderminate;TT: tuberculoid (TT); BT: borderline-tuberculoid; BB: borderline-borderline;BL: borderline-lepromatous;LL:lepromatous.MB:multibacillary; PB: paucibacillary. WHO

**: world health orgnazation.

*P<0.05.

T1R:Reversal reaction or type 1 reaction, T2R:Erythema nodosum leprosum or type 2 reaction.

Regarding operational classification, 1393 cases (65.55%) were MB, and 732 (34.45%) were PB (Table 1). Regarding Ridley–Jopling classification, the predominant form was BL (n = 912, 42.92%), followed by BT (n = 503, 23.67%), LL (n = 284, 13.36%), TT (n = 201, 9.46%), BB (n = 197, 9.27%), and indeterminate (I) (n = 28, 1.32%) (Table 1). A leprosy reaction was reported in 285 (13.41%) cases (Table 1). With regard to physical disability, 1239 (58.78%) patients had grade 0 disability, 325 (15.29%) had grade 1 disability, and 415 (19.53%) had grade 2 disability (Table 1).

Symptom signatures of leprosy

Among 2125 newly detected cases of leprosy disease with symptom signatures, 5000 symptoms were recorded, averaging 2.4 symptoms per case. A total of 34 distinct presenting symptoms were reported in the study population, and 76 symptoms were described in LEPMIS (Table 2). The presenting symptoms were divided into symptoms related to clinical features, skin (skin appendages and skin lesions), nerves, leprosy reactions, disability, and facial and other organ features (Table 2). The predominant symptoms were skin symptoms (n = 2533, 50.66%), followed by nerve symptoms (n = 1775, 35.50%), disability (n = 316, 6.32%), and leprosy reactions (n = 297, 5.94%) (Table 3). Symptoms related to skin (1935/2533, 76.39%) and leprosy reactions (279/297, 93.94%) mainly occurred in the MB group. Symptoms related to disability (263/316, 83.23%), clinical features (38/56, 69.09%), and facial features (19/23, 82.61%) predominantly occurred in the delayed diagnosis group (Table 3).

Table 2. The defined symptoms of interest as derived from those described in the LEPMIS in Yunnan, China 2010–2020.

Symptom construct Symptom(s) as originally described in LEPMIS Category
Injury Injury Clnical feature
Refractory Refractory Clnical feature
Weak Weak Clnical feature
Eyebrows hair loss Eyebrows fall off Skin Symptoms (Skin appendages)
Eyelashes loss Skin Symptoms (Skin appendages)
Hair Loss Skin Symptoms (Skin appendages)
Anhidrosis & Dryness Anhidrosis Skin Symptoms (Skin appendages)
Hypohidrosis Skin Symptoms (Skin appendages)
Dryness Skin Symptoms (Skin appendages)
Infiltration Facial infiltration Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Auricular infiltration Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Trunk infiltration Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Erythema Erythema Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Erythema Pallidum Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Dark Erythema Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Tubercle Tubercle Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Blisters Blisters Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Light-colored spot Light-colored spot Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
White spot Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Pale white spot Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Plaque Plaque Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Papules Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Rashes Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Skin lesion Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Mass Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Brown spot Brown spot Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Black spot Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Moss Scale Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Moss Skin Symptoms (Skin lesion)
Numbness Numbness Nerve symptoms
Painless nor pruritic skin lesions Neither pain nor pruritus of skin lesion Nerve symptoms
Pain Pain Nerve symptoms
Formic sensation Formic sensation Nerve symptoms
Creeping sensation Nerve symptoms
Needling sensation Nerve symptoms
Burning sensation Nerve symptoms
Pruritus Pruritus Nerve symptoms
Sensory disturbance Sensory disturbance Nerve symptoms
Loss of sensation Nerve symptoms
Insensibility to pain Nerve symptoms
Hypoesthesia Nerve symptoms
Paresthesia Nerve symptoms
Redness and/or swelling Facial redness Leprosy reaction (I/II)
Facial redness and swelling Leprosy reaction (I/II)
Facial Edema Leprosy reaction (I/II)
Limbs Edema Leprosy reaction (I/II)
Limbs redness and swelling Leprosy reaction (I/II)
Limbs redness Leprosy reaction (I/II)
Body redness and swelling Leprosy reaction (I/II)
Body Edema Leprosy reaction (I/II)
Fever Fever Leprosy reaction (I/II)
High fever Leprosy reaction (I/II)
Erythema nodosum Erythema nodosum Leprosy reaction (I/II)
Ulcer Ulcer Disability
Fester and erode Disability
Ulceration Disability
Chapped Disability
Finger contracture Hook fingers Disability
Muscle atrophy* Muscle Atrophy Disability
Shortening of fingers and toes Shortening of fingers and toes Disability
Motor dysfunction Motor dysfunction Disability
Stiff Disability
Claw hand and/or foot Claw hand Disability
Claw foot Disability
Eyelids Incomplete closure Eyelids Incomplete closure Facial feature
Red eyes Red eyes Facial feature
Angle of mouth askew /facial paralysis Angle of mouth askew Facial feature
Facial paralysis Facial feature
Nasal symptoms Nose collapsed Facial feature
Nasal deformity Facial feature
Nasal Erythema Facial feature
Nasal numbness Facial feature
Nasal congestion Facial feature
Turbinate enlargement Facial feature
Larynx Hoarseness Other organ
Scrotum Scrotal swelling Other organ

* Muscle atrophy presented in hand and lower limbs.

Table 3. Observed Proportions of Presenting Symptoms in Newly Detected Leprosy Cases in Yunnan, China, 2010–2020.

Leprosy MB PB P value Early diagnosis Delayed diagnosis P value
N % 95%CI N % 95%CI N % 95%CI N % 95%CI N % 95%CI
Clinical features 56 1,12% 0,83% 1,41% 27 0,78% 0,49% 1,08% 29 1,84% 1,18% 2,51% 0,8502 17 0,59% 0,31% 0,87% 38 1,93% 1,32% 2,53% 0.0001*
Skin 2533 50,66% 49,27% 52,05% 1935 56,22% 54,56% 57,87% 612 38,93% 36,52% 41,34% <0.0001* 1581 54,91% 53,10% 56,73% 865 43,86% 41,67% 46,05% <0.0001*
(Skin appendages) 656 13,12% 12,18% 14,06% 546 15,86% 14,64% 17,08% 110 7,00% 5,74% 8,26% <0.0001* 364 12,64% 11,43% 13,86% 262 13,29% 11,79% 14,78% <0.0001*
(Skin lesion) 1877 37,54% 36,20% 38,88% 1389 40,35% 38,72% 41,99% 502 31,93% 29,63% 34,24% <0.0001* 1217 42,27% 40,47% 44,08% 603 30,58% 28,54% 32,61% <0.0001*
Nerve 1775 35,50% 34,17% 36,83% 1080 31,38% 29,83% 32,93% 695 44,21% 41,76% 46,67% <0.0001* 1050 36,47% 34,71% 38,23% 674 34,18% 32,09% 36,27% <0.0001*
Leprosy reaction (I/II) 297 5,94% 5,28% 6,60% 279 8,11% 7,19% 9,02% 18 1,15% 0,62% 1,67% <0.0001* 175 6,08% 5,21% 6,95% 113 5,73% 4,70% 6,76% <0.0001*
Disability 316 6,32% 5,65% 6,99% 104 3,02% 2,45% 3,59% 212 13,49% 11,80% 15,17% <0.0001* 52 1,81% 1,32% 2,29% 263 13,34% 11,84% 14,84% <0.0001*
Facial feature & Other organ 23 0,46% 0,27% 0,65% 17 0,49% 0,26% 0,73% 6 0,38% 0,08% 0,69% 0.0028* 4 0,14% 0,00% 0,28% 19 0,96% 0,53% 1,39% <0.0001*

MB: multibacillary, PB: paucibacillary.

*P<0.05.

Skin symptoms were divided into skin lesions (n = 1877, 37.54%) and skin appendage symptoms (656, 13.12%). The common symptoms of skin lesions were erythema (n = 802, 16.04%), tubercles (n = 442, 8.84%), plaques (n = 231, 4.62%), infiltration (139, 2.78%), light-colored spots (n = 129, 2.58%), and blisters (n = 107, 2.14%). The common symptoms affecting skin appendages were eyebrow hair loss (n = 467, 9.34%) and anhidrosis and dryness (n = 189, 3.78%). Regarding nerve symptoms, the most common symptom was numbness (n = 828, 16.56%), followed by painless nor pruritic skin lesions (n = 651, 13.02%). It is worth noting that formic sensation (n = 99, 1.98%), pain (n = 92, 1.84%), and pruritus (n = 56, 1.12%) were also reported by patients with leprosy. Redness and/or swelling was the most common symptom of a leprosy reaction (n = 257, 5.14%). Finger contracture (n = 109, 2.18%), ulcers (n = 101, 2.02%), and muscle atrophy (n = 71, 1.42%) were three most common symptoms of physical disability (Table 3). Injury (n = 14, 0.30%), refractory illness (n = 20, 0.22%) and weakness (n = 22, 0.26%) were related clinical features. Other involved organs included the eyes (n = 8, 0.16%), nose (n = 7, 0.14%), mouth (n = 6, 0.12%), larynx (n = 1, 0.02%), and scrotum (n = 1, 0.02%) (Table 3).

Symptoms related to MB and PB leprosy

The distributions of symptoms in MB and PB patients are shown in Fig 2. Similar proportions of clinical symptoms were found in MB and PB patients: injury [MB vs. PB, 50.00% (7/14) vs. 50.00% (7/14)], refractory illness [MB vs. PB, 55.00% (11/20) vs. 45.00% (9/20)] and weakness [MB vs. PB, 40.91% (9/22) vs. 59.09% (13/22)] (Table 4). With regard to symptoms of skin appendages, no significant differences in anhidrosis and dryness (MB vs. PB, 52.38% (99/189) vs. 47.67% (90/189)] were present between MB and PB patients, while eyebrow hair loss [MB vs. PB, 95.72% (447/467) vs. 4.28% (20/467)] was predominant in MB patients (Table 4). Among those reporting skin lesion-related symptoms, light-colored spots mainly occurred in PB patients [MB vs. PB, 37.21% (48/129) vs. 62.79% (81/129), while other skin lesions, including erythema (521/802, 64.69%), tubercles (438/442, 99.10%), blisters (73/107, 68.22%), papules (165/231, 71.43%), and infiltration (127/139, 91.37%) mainly occurred in MB patients (Table 4). With regard to nerve symptoms, the proportions of numbness [MB vs. PB, 56.34% (464/828) vs. 43.66% (364/828)] and pain [MB vs. PB, 56.52% (52/92) vs. 43.48% (40/92)] were similar between the MB and PB patient groups (Table 4). Painless nor pruritic skin lesions (408/651, 62.67%), formic sensation (77/99, 77.78%), pruritus (44/56, 78.57%) and sensory disturbance (35/49, 71.43%) were predominant in the MB group (Table 4). Symptoms related to leprosy reactions, including redness and/or swelling (240/257, 93.39%), fever (26/27, 96.30%), erythema nodosum (13/13, 100.00%), and facial features (17/23, 73.91%), mainly occurred in the MB group (Table 4). In contrast, some symptoms related to disability, such as finger contracture (82/109, 78.90%), muscle atrophy (56/71, 78.87%), and motor dysfunction (16/18, 88.89%), mainly occurred in the PB group, while ulcer [MB vs. PB: 54.46% (55/101) vs. 45.54% (46/101)] and shortening of the fingers and toes [MB vs. PB: 50.00% (6/12) vs. 50.00% (6/12)] occurred at similar rates in the MB and PB groups (Table 4). The odds ratios of symptoms in MB and PB patients are shown in S1 Table.

Fig 2. Observed Proportions of Presenting Symptoms in MB and PB Leprosy Patients.

Fig 2

Table 4. Observed Proportions of Presenting Symptoms in MB and PB of Newly Detected Leprosy Cases in Yunnan, China 2010–2020.

Symptoms Leprosy(n, %) 95%CI MB(n, %) 95%CI PB(n, %) 95%CI P value
Injury 14 0.28% 0.13% 0.43% 7 0.20% 0.05% 0.35% 7 0.45% 0.12% 0.77% >0.9999
Refractory 20 0.40% 0.23% 0.57% 11 0.32% 0.13% 0.51% 9 0.57% 0.20% 0.95% 0.7524
Weak 22 0.44% 0.26% 0.62% 9 0.26% 0.09% 0.43% 13 0.83% 0.38% 1.27% 0.366
Eyebrows fall off 467 9.34% 8.53% 10.15% 447 12.99% 11.86% 14.11% 20 1.27% 0.72% 1.83% <0.0001*
Anhidrosis& dryness 189 3.78% 3.25% 4.31% 99 2.88% 2.32% 3.43% 90 5.73% 4.58% 6.87% 0.4106
Erythema 802 16.04% 15.02% 17.06% 521 15.14% 13.94% 16.33% 281 17.88% 15.98% 19.77% <0.0001*
Tubercle 442 8.84% 8.05% 9.63% 438 12.73% 11.61% 13.84% 4 0.25% 0.01% 0.50% <0.0001*
Plaque 231 4.62% 4.04% 5.20% 165 4.79% 4.08% 5.51% 80 5.09% 4.00% 6.18% <0.0001*
Infiltration 139 2.78% 2.32% 3.24% 127 3.69% 3.06% 4.32% 12 0.76% 0.33% 1.19% <0.0001**
Light-colored spot 129 2.58% 2.14% 3.02% 48 1.39% 1.00% 1.79% 81 5.15% 4.06% 6.25% <0.0001*
Blisters 107 2.14% 1.74% 2.54% 73 2.12% 1.64% 2.60% 34 2.16% 1.44% 2.88% <0.0001*
Brown spot 14 0.28% 0.13% 0.43% 9 0.26% 0.09% 0.43% 5 0.32% 0.04% 0.60% 0.2568
Moss 13 0.26% 0.12% 0.40% 8 0.23% 0.07% 0.39% 5 0.32% 0.04% 0.60% 0.4338
Numbness 828 16.56% 15.53% 17.59% 464 13.48% 12.34% 14.62% 364 23.16% 21.07% 25.24% <0.0001*
Painless nor pruritus of skin lesion 651 13.02% 12.09% 13.95% 408 11.85% 10.77% 12.93% 243 15.46% 13.67% 17.25% <0.0001*
Formic sensation 99 1.98% 1.59% 2.37% 77 2.24% 1.74% 2.73% 22 1.40% 0.82% 1.98% <0.0001*
Pain 92 1.84% 1.47% 2.21% 52 1.51% 1.10% 1.92% 40 2.54% 1.77% 3.32% 0.1046
Pruritus 56 1.12% 0.83% 1.41% 44 1.28% 0.90% 1.65% 12 0.76% 0.33% 1.19% <0.0001*
Sensory disturbance 49 0.98% 0.71% 1.25% 35 1.02% 0.68% 1.35% 14 0.89% 0.43% 1.36% <0.0001*
Redness and/or swelling 257 5.14% 4.53% 5.75% 240 6.97% 6.12% 7.82% 17 1.08% 0.57% 1.59% <0.0001*
Fever 27 0.54% 0.34% 0.74% 26 0.76% 0.47% 1.04% 1 0.06% -0.06% 0.19% <0.0001*
Erythema nodosum 13 0.26% 0.12% 0.40% 13 0.38% 0.17% 0.58% 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% <0.0001*
Finger contracture 109 2.18% 1.78% 2.58% 23 0.67% 0.40% 0.94% 86 5.47% 4.35% 6.59% <0.0001*
Ulcer 101 2.02% 1.63% 2.41% 55 1.60% 1.18% 2.02% 46 2.93% 2.09% 3.76% 0.2602
Muscle atrophy* 71 1.42% 1.09% 1.75% 15 0.44% 0.22% 0.66% 56 3.56% 2.65% 4.48% <0.0001*
Shortening of fingers and/or toes 12 0.24% 0.10% 0.38% 6 0.17% 0.03% 0.31% 6 0.38% 0.08% 0.69% >0.9999
Motor dysfunction 18 0.36% 0.19% 0.53% 2 0.06% -0.02% 0.14% 16 1.02% 0.52% 1.51% <0.0001*
Claw hand and/or foot 5 0.10% 0.01% 0.19% 3 0.09% -0.01% 0.19% 2 0.13% -0.05% 0.30% >0.9999
Facial features and others 23 0.46% 0.27% 0.65% 17 0.49% 0.26% 0.73% 6 0.38% 0.08% 0.69% 0.0028*
Eyelids Incomplete closure 7 0.14% 0.04% 0.24% 4 0.12% 0.00% 0.23% 3 0.19% -0.02% 0.41% >0.9999
Red eyes 1 0.02% -0.02% 0.06% 1 0.03% -0.03% 0.09% 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% >0.9999
Angle of mouth askew 6 0.12% 0.02% 0.22% 4 0.12% 0.00% 0.23% 2 0.13% -0.05% 0.30% 0.5671
Nasal symptoms 7 0.14% 0.04% 0.24% 6 0.17% 0.03% 0.31% 1 0.06% -0.06% 0.19% 0.0291*
Larynx 1 0.02% -0.02% 0.06% 1 0.03% -0.03% 0.09% 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% >0.9999
Scrotum 1 0.02% -0.02% 0.06% 1 0.03% -0.03% 0.09% 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% >0.9999

MB: multibacillary, PB: paucibacillary.

*P<0.05.

Symptoms related to early and delayed diagnoses

As 56 records were missing information about the stage of leprosy, 2069 newly detected leprosy patients were included in the analysis of symptoms related to early or delayed diagnosis. In total, 1249 (58.78%) and 820 (38.59%) patients were divided into early and delayed diagnosis groups, respectively. The proportions of symptoms in the early and delayed diagnosis groups are shown in Fig 3. Injury (10/14, 71.43%), refractory illness (11/19, 57.89%) and weakness (17/22, 77.27%), the symptoms of clinical features, were mainly present in the delayed diagnosis group. Despite the substantial proportion of patients with early diagnosis, few newly detected leprosy patients in the early diagnosis group had recorded clinical features such as injury (4/14, 28.57%), refractory illness (3/9, 33.33%), or weakness (5/22, 22.73%) (Table 5). With regard to symptoms of skin appendages, no significant differences in eyebrow hair loss (59.59% vs. 41.32%) or anhidrosis and dryness [59.59% (261/438) vs. 40.41% (177/438)] was observed between the early and delayed diagnosis groups (Table 5). Among those reporting skin lesion-related symptoms, erythema (555/786, 70.61%), tubercles (274/418, 65.55%), infiltration (91/132, 68.94%), and light-colored spots (80/126, 63.49%) mainly occurred in the early diagnosis group (Table 5). With regard to nerve symptoms, the rates of numbness [52.40% (425/811) vs. 47.60% (386/811)] and pain [55.06% (49/89) vs. 44.94% (40/89)] were similar between the early and delayed diagnosis groups (Table 5). Painless nor pruritic skin lesions (460/636, 72.33%), formic sensation (61/93, 65.59%) and pruritus (34/53, 64.15%) were predominant in the early diagnosis group (Table 5). Symptoms related to leprosy reactions mainly occurred in the early diagnosis group: redness and/or swelling (151/249, 60.64%), fever (14/26, 53.85%), and erythema nodosum (10/13, 76.92%) (Table 5). In contrast, symptoms related to disability, such as finger contracture (104/109, 95.41%), ulcers (74/100, 74.00%), muscle atrophy (53/71, 74.65%), motor dysfunction (16/18, 88.89%), shortening of the fingers and toes (11/12, 91.67%), claw hands and/or foot deformity (5/5, 100.00%), and facial features (19/23, 82.61%), mainly occurred in the delayed diagnosis group (Table 5). The odds ratios of symptoms in the early diagnosis group are shown in S2 Table.

Fig 3. Observed Proportions of Presenting Symptoms in Leprosy Patients with Early and Delayed Diagnosis.

Fig 3

Table 5. Observed Proportions of Early Diagnosis and Delayed Diagnosis Associated with Presenting Symptoms in Newly Detected Leprosy Cases in Yunnan, China, 2010–2020.

Symptoms Leprosy (n,%) 95%CI Early diagnosis(n, %) 95%CI Delayed diagnosis(n, %) 95%CI P value
Injury 14 0.29% 0.14% 0.44% 4 0.14% 0.00% 0.28% 10 0.51% 0.19% 0.82% 0.057
Refractory 19 0.39% 0.22% 0.57% 8 0.28% 0.09% 0.47% 11 0.56% 0.23% 0.88% 0.5171
Weak 22 0.45% 0.26% 0.64% 5 0.17% 0.02% 0.33% 17 0.86% 0.45% 1.27% 0.0007*
Eyebrows fall off 438 9.02% 8.21% 9.82% 261 9.07% 8.02% 10.11% 177 8.98% 7.69% 10.20% <0.0001*
Anhidrosis& dryness 188 3.87% 3.33% 4.41% 103 3.58% 2.90% 4.26% 85 4.31% 3.40% 5.19% 0.0794
Erythema 786 16.18% 15.14% 17.22% 555 19.28% 17.84% 20.72% 231 11.71% 10.26% 13.09% <0.0001*
Tubercle 418 8.60% 7.82% 9.39% 274 9.52% 8.45% 10.59% 144 7.30% 6.13% 8.42% <0.0001*
Plaque 226 4.65% 4.06% 5.24% 151 5.24% 4.43% 6.06% 75 3.80% 2.95% 4.63% <0.0001*
Infiltration 132 2.72% 2.26% 3.17% 91 3.16% 2.52% 3.80% 41 2.08% 1.44% 2.70% <0.0001*
Light-colored spot 126 2.59% 2.15% 3.04% 80 2.78% 2.18% 3.38% 46 2.33% 1.66% 2.99% <0.0001*
Blisters 106 2.18% 1.77% 2.59% 52 1.81% 1.32% 2.29% 54 2.74% 2.01% 3.45% 0.8908
Brown spot 13 0.27% 0.12% 0.41% 8 0.28% 0.09% 0.47% 5 0.25% 0.03% 0.47% 0.4338
Moss 13 0.27% 0.12% 0.41% 6 0.21% 0.04% 0.37% 7 0.35% 0.09% 0.62% >0.9999
Numbness 811 16.69% 15.65% 17.74% 425 14.76% 13.47% 16.06% 386 19.57% 17.76% 21.25% 0.0591
Painless nor pruritus skin lesions 636 13.09% 12.14% 14.04% 460 15.98% 14.64% 17.32% 176 8.92% 7.64% 10.15% <0.0001*
Formic sensation 93 1.91% 1.53% 2.30% 61 2.12% 1.59% 2.64% 32 1.62% 1.06% 2.17% <0.0001*
Pain 89 1.83% 1.45% 2.21% 49 1.70% 1.23% 2.17% 40 2.03% 1.40% 2.64% 0.2303
Pruritus 53 1.09% 0.80% 1.38% 34 1.18% 0.79% 1.58% 19 0.96% 0.53% 1.39% 0.0063*
Sensory disturbance 49 1.01% 0.73% 1.29% 21 0.73% 0.42% 1.04% 28 1.42% 0.89% 1.94% 0.2253
Redness and/or swelling 249 5.13% 4.51% 5.75% 151 5.24% 4.43% 6.06% 98 4.97% 4.00% 5.91% <0.0001*
Fever 26 0.54% 0.33% 0.74% 14 0.49% 0.23% 0.74% 12 0.61% 0.26% 0.95% 0.7819
Erythema nodosum 13 0.27% 0.12% 0.41% 10 0.35% 0.13% 0.56% 3 0.15% -0.02% 0.32% 0.0169*
Finger contracture 109 2.24% 1.83% 2.66% 5 0.17% 0.02% 0.33% 104 5.27% 4.27% 6.24% <0.0001*
Ulcer 100 2.06% 1.66% 2.46% 26 0.90% 0.56% 1.25% 74 3.75% 2.90% 4.58% <0.0001*
Muscle atrophy* 71 1.46% 1.12% 1.80% 18 0.63% 0.34% 0.91% 53 2.69% 1.97% 3.39% <0.0001*
Motor dysfunction 18 0.37% 0.20% 0.54% 2 0.07% -0.03% 0.17% 16 0.81% 0.41% 1.20% <0.0001*
Shortening of fingers and/or toes 12 0.25% 0.11% 0.39% 1 0.03% -0.03% 0.10% 11 0.56% 0.23% 0.88% 0.0001*
Claw hand and/or foot 5 0.10% 0.01% 0.19% 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 5 0.25% 0.03% 0.47% 0.0079*
Facial features and others 23 0.47% 0.28% 0.67% 4 0.14% 0.00% 0.28% 19 0.96% 0.53% 1.39% <0.0001*
Eyelids Incomplete closure 7 0.14% 0.04% 0.25% 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 7 0.35% 0.09% 0.62% 0.0006*
Red eyes 1 0.02% -0.02% 0.06% 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.05% -0.05% 0.15% >0.9999
Angle of mouth askew 6 0.12% 0.02% 0.22% 1 0.03% -0.03% 0.10% 5 0.25% 0.03% 0.47% 0.0801
Nasal symptoms 7 0.14% 0.04% 0.25% 2 0.07% -0.03% 0.17% 5 0.25% 0.03% 0.47% 0.2861
Larynx 1 0.02% -0.02% 0.06% 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1 0.05% -0.05% 0.15% >0.9999
Scrotum 1 0.02% -0.02% 0.06% 1 0.03% -0.03% 0.10% 0 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% >0.9999

*P<0.05.

Initial symptoms at symptom onset and only symptoms at diagnosis

A total of 2069 and 2125 newly detected leprosy patients were included in the analyses of initial symptoms and only symptoms related to physical disability and diagnosis interval, respectively. The initial symptoms at symptom onset and the only symptoms at diagnosis were divided into skin, skin and nerve, and nerve symptoms (Table 6). The proportions of skin, skin and nerve, and nerve symptoms as initial symptoms were 33.25%, 44.95%, and 21.80% and as only symptoms were 28.66%, 57.81%, and 13.53%, respectively. Regarding initial symptoms, the proportions of patients with physical disability (G1D + G2D) were 28.92%, 30.32% and 57.65% for skin, skin and nerve, and nerve symptoms, respectively. Regarding only symptoms, the proportions were 25.97%, 33.78% and 65.36%, respectively. Similarly, regarding skin, skin and nerve, and nerve symptoms as initial symptoms, the proportions of patients with a diagnosis interval of more than 5 years were 8.72%, 5.70%, and 15.97%, respectively. For these symptoms as the only symptoms, the proportions were 7.25%, 7.78%, and 17.50%, respectively (Table 6). In addition, for skin, skin and nerve, and nerve symptoms as the initial symptoms, the means±standard deviations (SDs) of the diagnosis intervals were 28.77±31.55, 25.60±26.20, and 38.88±46.02, respectively. For these symptoms as the only symptoms, the means±SDs of the diagnosis intervals were 27.52±28.89, 28.07±30.66, and 40.35±49.36, respectively (Table 6).

Table 6. Initial Symptoms at Symptom Onset and Only Symptoms at Diagnosis in Newly Detected Leprosy Cases in Yunnan, China, 2010–2020.

Presenting symptoms First symptoms(n, %) Only Symptoms(n, %)
Skin Skin & nerve Nerve Skin Skin & nerve Nerve
Physical disability Total 688 33.25% 930 44.95% 451 21.80% 593 28.66% 1196 57.81% 280 13.53%
G0D 489 71.08% 648 69.68% 191 42.35% 439 74.03% 792 66.22% 97 34.64%
G1D 111 16.13% 127 13.66% 88 19.51% 93 15.68% 176 14.72% 57 20.36%
G2D 88 12.79% 155 16.67% 172 38.14% 61 10.29% 228 19.06% 126 45.00%
G1D+G2D 199 28.92% 282 30.32% 260 57.65% 154 25.97% 404 33.78% 183 65.36%
Diagnosis interval (years) Total 708 33.32% 953 44.85% 464 21.83% 603 28.38% 1238 58.26% 284 13.36%
≤2 y 492 69.49% 700 73.45% 245 52.80% 432 71.64% 856 69.14% 149 52.46%
2–5 y 156 22.03% 200 20.99% 146 31.47% 129 21.39% 287 23.18% 86 30.28%
5–10 y 43 6.07% 36 3.78% 45 9.70% 29 4.81% 68 5.49% 27 9.51%
≥10 y 17 2.40% 17 1.78% 28 6.03% 13 2.16% 27 2.18% 22 7.75%
≥5 y 60 8.47% 53 5.56% 73 15.73% 42 6.97% 95 7.67% 49 17.25%
Diagnosis interval (months) Median (IQR) 20 (17–26) 20 (17–25) 23 (17–39) 20 (17–25) 20 (17–27) 23 (17–40)
Min-Max 1–341 1–360 1–364 1–273 1–361 1–364
Mean±SD 28.77±31.55 25.60±26.20 38.88±46.02 27.52±28.89 28.07±30.66 40.35±49.36
95%CI of Mean 26.44–31.10 23.97–27.26 34.68–43.08 25.21–29.83 26.36–29.78 34.59–46.12

IQR:interquartile range.

Discussion

Understanding the symptoms associated with leprosy, the subtypes of leprosy, and the diagnostic interval will help guide early diagnosis initiatives. In this retrospective analysis, we described the main complaints in newly detected leprosy patients over the past decade in Yunnan, China, a region with a high burden of leprosy, and revealed the common symptoms of leprosy and the symptoms associated with different subtypes of leprosy and different diagnostic intervals using data from a population-based cohort of patients with incident leprosy.

Information about presenting symptoms in the patient population was obtained via symptom self-reports and record-based symptom information extraction. To collect data on self-reported symptoms, information about presenting symptoms can be directly elicited from patients through semistructured interviews or questionnaires [9]. Alternatively, for record-based symptom information collection, information on presenting symptoms can be recorded during healthcare encounters (e.g., with a primary care physician) and captured as part of the patient’s health record [9]. In this study, we used the latter approach, as self-reported symptoms captured retrospectively (after diagnosis) would have a high risk of bias [9].

Presenting symptoms have been reported in numerous studies and included weakness [10], anhidrosis and dryness [10], eyebrow hair loss [11], eye closure weakness [12], a collapsed nose [13], edema [14], erythema nodosum [15], numbness [16], loss of sensation [10], pain [17], pruritus [18], muscle atrophy [19], and claw hand deformity [20,21]. Initially, the small sensory and autonomic nerve fibers in the skin are damaged, causing local loss of hair, an inability to sweat and difficulty detecting temperature and touch sensations. Damage to peripheral nerves can lead to widespread skin dryness, loss of sensation, and weakness or paralysis of the muscles in areas of the body supplied by the affected nerve. Eyes, hands, and feet with loss of sensation, paralysis or dryness have an increased risk of injury. Dry skin can lead to cracks. If cracks, injuries, and ulcerations are not cared for and healed, they can become infected, leading to further injury and destruction, resulting in visible damage and destruction of the eyes, hands, and feet. These are easily observed impairments; these injuries, along with paralysis, are obvious and considered grade 2 disability in leprosy [10].

A symptom signature denotes the nature and relative frequency of symptoms (or symptom combinations) at presentation to the medical facility by patients later diagnosed with leprosy or with a particular subtype or stage of leprosy. As leprosy mainly affects the skin and peripheral nervous system, skin symptoms and nerve symptoms were predominant. Numbness (nerve symptoms), erythema (skin lesions), painless nor pruritic skin lesions (nerve symptoms), eyebrow hair loss (skin appendage), and tubercles (skin lesion) were common symptoms of leprosy. Despite the low proportions, nerve (formic sensation, pain, and pruritus) and disability (finger contracture, muscle atrophy, and motor dysfunction) symptoms, which have been seldom mentioned as physical symptoms of leprosy previously, were obvious in this study.

Among the newly detected cases of leprosy with symptom signatures in this study, the majority of cases were MB cases, while minority were PB cases. Describing only the symptoms related to leprosy would lead to bias in the presenting symptoms; thus, we analyzed the symptoms related to the subtypes of leprosy in detail. Light-colored spots and pale-white spots mainly occurred in PB cases, while other skin symptoms, including erythema, eyebrows hair loss, tubercles, blisters, plaques, infiltration, and papules, mainly occurred in MB cases. Symptoms related to leprosy reactions and facial features mainly occurred in MB cases, while symptoms related to physical disability, such as finger contracture, muscle atrophy, and motor dysfunction, mainly occurred in the PB group. In addition, painless nor pruritic skin lesions, formic sensation, pruritus, and sensory disturbance were predominant in the MB group. The diverse clinical manifestations are strongly correlated with the host’s immune response to M. leprae [22]. Symptom signatures can be described as “narrow”, when most patients present with a particular symptom, or “broad”, when patients present with a wide range of symptoms [9]; eyebrow hair loss, tubercles, papules, and symptoms related to leprosy reactions, such as redness and/or swelling, fever, and erythema nodosum, which all had proportions higher than 90% in MB cases, were considered narrow signatures of MB leprosy. In this study, we also found that finger contracture, muscle atrophy, and motor dysfunction were potential symptoms of PB leprosy.

Early diagnosis is an important aspect of leprosy control strategies, as early case detection, regular and complete MDT, and early detection of impairment and disability have played a pivotal role in reducing the disease and disability burdens in the community [2]. Awareness of presenting symptoms will improve the level of leprosy awareness in the community and the capacity of the health system to recognize leprosy early, thus influencing the length of the interval from symptom onset to presentation (the patient interval) and from initial presentation to specialist referral (the primary care interval) [5]. We described the symptoms related to the different stages of diagnosis. All the skin and leprosy reactions symptoms and some of the nerve symptoms, including painless nor pruritic skin lesions, formic sensation, and pruritus, mainly existed in the early diagnosis group, while all symptoms related to clinical features, facial features and physical disability mainly occurred in the delayed diagnosis group. Finger contracture, shortening of the fingers and toes, and claw hand and/or foot deformity were regarded as narrow signatures and associated with delayed diagnosis of leprosy. It is worth noting that painless nor pruritic skin lesions, formic sensation and pruritus occurred in not only the MB group but also the early diagnosis group, while symptoms related to physical disability, such as finger contracture, muscle atrophy, and motor dysfunction, were associated with not only PB but also delayed diagnosis, which implies that diagnosis of PB leprosy, which usually presents as physical disability even in the early stage of disease onset, is a critical problem that needs further research.

Leprosy neuropathy is considered the most common peripheral neuropathy with an infectious etiology worldwide and a public health problem [23]. Diagnosing leprosy in the absence of typical dermatological features is challenging, and a lack of features frequently causes a delay in diagnosis [24]. Primary neural leprosy (PNL), also known as pure neural or neuritic leprosy, was initially described in the Indian classification in 1955 [25]. Since then, it has been a challenge to clinically diagnose, as no skin lesions occur and slit skin smear bacilloscopy is negative. In a previous study, 4–8% (up to 18% in some Indian case series) of patients with leprosy may present with PNL, characterized by evidence of nerve deficit or thickening, with or without tenderness in the absence of skin involvement [26]. According to another Indian study, on average, PNL accounts for 5–17.7% of all leprosy cases [27]. In this study, 21.80% and 13.53% of the newly detected leprosy patients presented with nerve symptoms as the first symptoms and the only symptoms, respectively, consistent with previous studies. Despite having the lowest patient proportion, the nerve symptom group had the highest proportion of physical disability and the longest diagnosis interval compared with the skin and skin and nerve groups. These results imply that we should increase awareness of nerve symptoms. Individuals with nerve symptoms should be considered the new target population, neurology outpatients should undergo leprosy screening, and focused training should be provided for specialized neurology medical staff to enhance the capacity of health systems to recognize leprosy early.

In summary, this study provides a detailed description of the symptom signatures of leprosy, including MB/PB leprosy, leprosy with an early/delayed diagnosis, leprosy for which the first/only symptoms are physical disability and leprosy diagnosed at different intervals, among newly detected leprosy patients. Numbness, erythema, painless nor pruritic skin lesions, eyebrow hair loss, and tubercles were common symptoms of leprosy. Despite their low proportions, formic sensation, pain, pruritus, finger contracture, muscle atrophy, and motor dysfunction were reported during the diagnosis of leprosy. In detail, finger contracture, muscle atrophy, and motor dysfunction mainly occurred in the PB group. These symptoms, along with other symptoms related to disability, were predominantly in the delayed diagnosis group. This implies that leprosy diagnosis, especially PB leprosy diagnosis, is still a challenge. As nerve symptoms were related to physical disability and a longer diagnosis interval, increasing awareness of nerve symptoms would be helpful for preventing physical disability and promoting the early detection of leprosy cases.

To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date to examine the symptoms of newly detected leprosy cases before diagnosis. Our findings are based on a large cohort of newly detected leprosy patients and self-reported data on symptoms, WHO classification, diagnosis interval and physical disability. The study participants were largely representative of leprosy patients nationwide, with some underrepresentation of reversal reaction and erythema nodosum leprosum.

This study has some limitations. First, as there is no standard assessment tool for risk of bias in observational nonrandomized studies, we could not evaluate the risk of bias. Second, because the disease exhibits different dermatologic and neurologic manifestations within a wide clinical spectrum, many diseases should be considered in the differential diagnosis [1]. We described only the symptoms relevant to leprosy and did not describe the symptoms used to form the differential diagnosis. Despite suspected symptoms, a leprosy diagnosis still needs to be confirmed with a special medical examination performed by trained medical staff according to the criteria of leprosy diagnosis. Third, the clinical features of the disease depend on bacterial proliferation, the immunologic response of the host to M. leprae, and peripheral neural involvement. According to the clinical features, leprosy can be divided into indeterminate leprosy, TT, BT, BB, BL, LL, type I leprosy reaction (reversal reaction), type II leprosy reaction, and some rare clinical forms, such as pure neural-type leprosy, histoid leprosy, localized lepromatous or borderline disease, and Lucio leprosy (lepra bonita) (erythema nodosum leprosum reaction) [1]. The number of leprosy patients enrolled in this study was limited; therefore, it was difficult to cover every subtype of leprosy. Further investigations in larger populations will increase confidence in the diagnostic and discriminatory value of the suspected symptoms.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the diagnosis of leprosy is still challenging because leprosy is one of “the great imitators” and a disease with “many faces” [1]. Expanding knowledge about the presenting symptoms will be helpful in the detection new leprosy cases. Elucidating suspected symptoms of leprosy would improve the clinical diagnosis rate and promote early diagnosis, thereby preventing physical disability in leprosy patients.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Odds ratios of MB of leprosy disease by presenting symptoms.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Odds ratios of early diagnosis of leprosy disease by presenting symptoms.

(XLSX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Health Commission of Yunnan Province (No:2017NS098) by TS. The funder played no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Kundakci N, Erdem C. Leprosy: a great imitator. Clin Dermatol. 2019;37: 200–212. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Naaz F, Mohanty PS, Bansal AK, Kumar D, Gupta UD. Challenges beyond elimination in leprosy. Int J Mycobacteriol. 2017;6: 222–228. doi: 10.4103/ijmy.ijmy_70_17 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Global leprosy update, 2016: accelerating reduction of disease burden. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2017;92: 501–519. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gómez L, Rivera A, Vidal Y, Bilbao J, Kasang C, Parisi S, et al. Factors associated with the delay of diagnosis of leprosy in north-eastern Colombia: a quantitative analysis. Trop Med Int Health. 2018;23: 193–198. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Da Silva Souza C, Bacha JT. Delayed diagnosis of leprosy and the potential role of educational activities in Brazil. Lepr Rev. 2003;74: 249–258. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leon KE, Jacob JT, Franco-Paredes C, Kozarsky PE, Wu HM, Fairley JK. Delayed diagnosis, leprosy reactions, and nerve injury among individuals with hansen’s disease seen at a United States clinic. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016;3: ofw063. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ridley DS, Jopling WH. Classification of leprosy according to immunity. A five-group system. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1966;34: 255–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.WHO. World health organization expert committee on leprosy: Seventh report. Technical Report Series 847. Geneva: WHO; 1998.
  • 9.Koo MM, Hamilton W, Walter FM, Rubin GP, Lyratzopoulos G. Symptom signatures and diagnostic timeliness in cancer patients: a review of current evidence. Neoplasia. 2018;20: 165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2017.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lockwood D, Colston MJ, Fine PE, Lucas S, Rose SP, McDougall AC. Prevention of disabilities and rehabilitation. Lepr Rev. 2002;73: S35–S43. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ferreira RC, Gonçalves TX, Soares A, Carvalho LRA, Campos FL, Ribeiro MTF, et al. Dependence on others for oral hygiene and its association with hand deformities and functional impairment in elders with a history of leprosy. Gerodontology. 2018. doi: 10.1111/ger.12346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Reinar LM, Forsetlund L, Lehman LF, Brurberg KG. Interventions for ulceration and other skin changes caused by nerve damage in leprosy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;7: CD012235. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012235.pub2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Husain S. Reconstruction of moderately depressed nose in leprosy (a long-term follow-up). Indian J Lepr. 2013;85: 115–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chandan N, Ashack KA, Hill C. Ulcers and edema in a patient with leprosy. Int J Dermatol. 2020;59: 1073–1075. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Narang T, Ashraf R, Kaushik A, Dogra S. Apremilast in multibacillary leprosy patients with chronic and recurrent erythema nodosum leprosum: a prospective single-centre pilot study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021. doi: 10.1111/jdv.17585 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hanewinckel R, van Oijen M, Ikram MA, van Doorn PA. The epidemiology and risk factors of chronic polyneuropathy. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31: 5–20. doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0094-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Raicher I, Stump PR, Baccarelli R, Marciano LH, Ura S, Virmond MC, et al. Neuropathic pain in leprosy. Clin Dermatol. 2016;34: 59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2015.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Noormohammadpour P, Kamyab-Hesari K, Razavi Z, Dolatyabi N, Taghizadeh Fazli J, Daneshpazhooh M, et al. An unusual case of multibacillary leprosy mimicking prurigo nodularis. Clin Case Rep. 2020;8: 1234–1237. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shrestha BK, Ranabhat K, Pant R, Sapkota S, Shrestha S. Neuritic leprosy; an intriguing re-visit to a forbidden ailment. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2019;17: 73–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miyashiro D, Cardona C, Valente NYS, Avancini J, Benard G, Trindade MAB. Ulcers in leprosy patients, an unrecognized clinical manifestation: a report of 8 cases. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19: 1013. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4639-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Riyaz N, Sehgal VN. Leprosy: trophic skin ulcers. Skinmed. 2017;15: 45–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Froes LAR Jr., Trindade MAB, Sotto MN. Immunology of leprosy. Int Rev Immunol. 2020: 1–21. doi: 10.1080/08830185.2020.1851370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Santos DFD, Mendonça MR, Antunes DE, Sabino EFP, Pereira RC, Goulart LR, et al. Revisiting primary neural leprosy: clinical, serological, molecular, and neurophysiological aspects. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11: e0006086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ooi W, Saini S. Diagnostic pitfalls in an atypical case of primary neuritic leprosy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;105: 490–493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Indian Association of Leprologists. Classification of leprosy adopted at all India leprosy workers conference. Lepr India. 1955;27: 93. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wilder-Smith E. Diagnosis of pure neuritic leprosy. Neurol J Southeast Asia. 2002;7: 61–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Girdhar BK. Neuritic leprosy. Indian J Lepr. 1996;68: 35–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Odds ratios of MB of leprosy disease by presenting symptoms.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Odds ratios of early diagnosis of leprosy disease by presenting symptoms.

(XLSX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES