Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2021 Nov 23;326(20):2073–2074. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16685

Trends in Obesity Prevalence Among Adults Aged 18 Through 25 Years, 1976-2018

Alejandra Ellison-Barnes 1,, Sara Johnson 2, Kimberly Gudzune 1
PMCID: PMC8611474  PMID: 34812876

Abstract

This study uses nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to examine changes in obesity prevalence in the US over the last 4 decades among adults aged 18 through 25 years.


Emerging adulthood, from ages 18 through 25 years, is a distinct developmental period characterized by exploration and frequent change (eg, from school to work), ultimately leading to the formation of lifelong habits and adult identity.1,2 Few studies describe obesity in emerging adults; analyses often group these individuals with adolescents (aged 12-19 years) or young adults (aged 20-39 years), limiting opportunities for developmentally informed intervention and treatment.3,4 We examined the changes in obesity prevalence nationally among emerging adults in the US over the last 4 decades.

Methods

We used nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a series of cross-sectional surveys including interviews and physical examinations with a stratified, multistage sampling design. We drew from NHANES II (1976-1980), NHANES III (1988-1994), and the continuous NHANES cycles from 1999 through 2018 (response rate range, 48.8%-80%). We limited our study population to nonpregnant emerging adults (aged 18-25 years) of non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White race with complete data for variables of interest (89.8% of defined population had complete data). Given the changes in how the NHANES assessed race and ethnicity over time, we were limited to the aforementioned groups.

Our outcome of interest was body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). We categorized BMI into standard groups of underweight (<18.5), normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9), and obesity (≥30).5 Covariates included sex (male or female), race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White), and family poverty status (yes or no). We identified family poverty if the NHANES poverty index (the ratio of family income to the US poverty threshold in NHANES II/III and the ratio of family income to the US poverty guidelines in the continuous NHANES) was at or below the poverty threshold or guidelines for that year. We did not include age, given the narrow range of interest.

For each wave, we estimated mean BMI and prevalence of each BMI group along with 95% CIs using NHANES examination weights to account for the complex sampling design and using poststratification to standardize to the internal 1999-2000 study population distribution based on sex, race and ethnicity, and poverty status. To test for trend across all years, we used a nonparametric, Wilcoxon-type test given the time differences between surveys.6 In sensitivity analyses, we combined the continuous NHANES cycles (1999-2018) and conducted a linear or logistic regression, as appropriate, to test for trend over time. Statistical significance was determined by a 2-sided P < .05. All analyses were performed using Stata version 15 (StataCorp). The Johns Hopkins institutional review board reviewed this study and determined that it was not human subjects research.

Results

Across all years, 8015 emerging adults were included. Of these, 3965 were female, 3037 were non-Hispanic Black, and 2386 met criteria for family poverty.

Between 1976 and 2018, mean BMI increased from 23.0 (95% CI, 22.8-23.2) in 1976-1980 to 27.5 (95% CI, 25.5-29.4) in 2017-2018 (P = .005 for trend using a nonparametric test) (Table). The Figure shows the standardized prevalence of BMI groups over time. Between 1976-1980 and 2017-2018, the prevalence of obesity increased from 5.5% (95% CI, 4.3%-7.0%) to 32.6% (95% CI, 22.1%-45.2%; P = .007 for trend using a nonparametric test), whereas normal weight decreased from 70.5% (95% CI, 67.8%-73.0%) to 34.0% (95% CI, 26.1%-42.9%; P = .02 for trend using a nonparametric test). The sensitivity analyses limited to the continuous NHANES cycles had similar results (Table).

Table. Standardized Mean Body Mass Index (BMI) and Prevalence of BMI Groups Among Non-Hispanic Black and Non-Hispanic White Emerging Adults (Aged 18-25 Years), 1976-2018a.

Survey year BMIb BMI groupsb
No.c Mean (95% CI) Underweight (<18.5) Normal weight (18.5-24.9) Overweight (25.0-29.9) Obesity (≥30.0)
No.c Weighted proportion, % (95% CI)d No.c Weighted proportion, % (95% CI)d No.c Weighted proportion, % (95% CI)d No.c Weighted proportion, % (95% CI)d
1976-1980 1974 23.0 (22.8-23.2) 127 5.9 (4.8-7.3) 1361 70.5 (67.8-73.0) 351 18.2 (16.2-20.3) 135 5.5 (4.3-7.0)
1988-1994 1396 24.3 (23.7-24.8) 74 5.8 (3.8-8.9) 811 59.4 (54.5-64.2) 281 20.0 (16.3-24.4) 230 14.8 (11.4-18.9)
1999-2000 359 25.9 (24.8-26.9) 14 4.5 (1.6-12.0) 183 48.1 (39.4-57.0) 83 27.5 (21.1-34.9) 79 19.9 (14.1-27.3)
2001-2002 550 25.8 (25.1-26.6) 33 4.2 (2.4-7.2) 293 52.6 (48.0-57.3) 118 23.8 (18.6-30.0) 106 19.3 (13.9-26.2)
2003-2004 608 26.4 (25.2-27.5) 31 4.2 (2.5-6.8) 304 49.0 (41.9-56.2) 130 23.1 (19.7-26.9) 143 23.8 (16.7-32.7)
2005-2006 616 26.5 (25.5-27.6) 23 5.8 (3.0-11.1) 296 47.1 (39.9-54.4) 135 22.6 (17.2-29.0) 162 24.5 (17.2-33.6)
2007-2008 415 26.3 (24.5-28.0) 18 5.1 (2.7-9.1) 200 50.2 (40.6-59.9) 100 23.1 (17.8-29.4) 97 21.6 (15.1-29.9)
2009-2010 484 26.8 (25.6-28.0) 20 2.7 (1.4-5.3) 242 48.7 (37.5-60.1) 98 22.6 (15.8-31.4) 124 26.0 (19.9-33.1)
2011-2012 481 25.9 (24.9-26.9) 25 5.7 (3.8-8.4) 213 51.7 (42.3-60.9) 111 21.6 (16.6-27.5) 132 21.1 (15.7-27.7)
2013-2014 477 26.7 (25.1-28.3) 22 4.2 (1.8-9.5) 223 48.3 (42.5-54.2) 112 24.5 (20.2-29.4) 120 22.9 (17.3-29.8)
2015-2016 337 27.5 (26.3-28.7) 14 2.9 (2.2-6.8) 153 42.6 (37.0-48.4) 85 26.2 (20.2-33.3) 85 27.3 (21.0-34.7)
2017-2018 318 27.5 (25.5-29.4) 22 8.7 (4.4-16.4) 127 34.0 (26.1-42.9) 64 24.8 (18.2-32.8) 105 32.6 (22.1-45.2)
P valuee .005 .26 .02 .06 .007
P value for sensitivity analysisf .04 .58 .02 .72 .03
a

Data are from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). All estimates were standardized to the internal 1999-2000 study population based on sex, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic White), and poverty status. Race and ethnicity options in NHANES III and the continuous NHANES cycles were defined by the NHANES survey developers and chosen by participants. For NHANES II, the race options were defined by the NHANES survey developers and individuals were classified by observation except in cases when the interviewer was unable to do so, in which case the participant was asked. Ethnicity was not directly assessed. A Hispanic ethnicity variable was constructed based on participant-reported natural origin or ancestry.

b

Calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

c

Counts are unweighted.

d

Examination weights were used to calculate weighted prevalence estimates and 95% CIs. The rare strata with single sampling units in the data were treated as certainty units to perform variance estimation.

e

Estimated using a nonparametric, Wilcoxon-type test for trend.

f

Estimated using survey-weighted, adjusted regressions for pooled data from continuous NHANES, 1999-2018.

Figure. Standardized Prevalence of Body Mass Index Groups Among Emerging Adults (Aged 18-25 Years) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1976-2018.

Figure.

Prevalence estimates calculated using survey weights and standardized to the internal 1999-2000 study population based on sex, race and ethnicity, and poverty status. Groups were defined using body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) as underweight (<18.5), normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9), and obesity (≥30.0).

Discussion

This analysis found that from 1976 to 2018, the prevalence of obesity among emerging adults in the US increased significantly. Limitations of this study include the population being limited to non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White individuals, patterns among whom may not be generalizable to other races or ethnicities, as well as a decline in the NHANES response rate over time. Additionally, survey weights cannot be used in the poststratification analysis, as the initial results rather than the study design determine the relative number in each stratum at this stage.

Emerging adulthood may be a key period for preventing and treating obesity given that habits formed during this period often persist through the remainder of the life course. There is an urgent need for research on risk factors contributing to obesity during this developmental stage to inform the design of interventions as well as policies aimed at prevention.

Section Editors: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Deputy Editor; Kristin Walter, MD, Senior Editor.

Supplement 1.

Retracted article with errors highlighted

Supplement 2.

Replacement article with corrections highlighted

References

  • 1.Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55(5):469-480. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hochberg ZE, Konner M. Emerging adulthood, a pre-adult life-history stage. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;10:918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ogden CL, Fryar CD, Hales CM, Carroll MD, Aoki Y, Freedman DS. Differences in obesity prevalence by demographics and urbanization in US children and adolescents, 2013-2016. JAMA. 2018;319(23):2410-2418. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5158 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Freedman DS, Aoki Y, Ogden CL. Differences in obesity prevalence by demographic characteristics and urbanization level among adults in the United States, 2013-2016. JAMA. 2018;319(23):2419-2429. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.National Institutes of Health . Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. Obes Res. 1998;6(suppl 2):51S-209S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cuzick J. A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. Stat Med. 1985;4(1):87-90. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780040112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplement 1.

Retracted article with errors highlighted

Supplement 2.

Replacement article with corrections highlighted


Articles from JAMA are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES