Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Nov 24;10(47):e00885-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00885-21

Draft Genome Sequence of Fusarium equiseti K3, a Fungal Species Isolated from Hexachlorocyclohexane-Contaminated Soil

Nelson Khan a, Rodolfo Brizola Toscan d, Accadius Lunayo c, Benson Wamalwa b, Edward Muge a, Francis J Mulaa a, René Kallies d, Hauke Harms d, Lukas Y Wick d, Ulisses Nunes da Rocha d,
Editor: Antonis Rokase
PMCID: PMC8612084  PMID: 34817210

ABSTRACT

We present the draft genome sequence of Fusarium equiseti strain K3, a fungus isolated from a hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH)-contaminated soil (Kitengela, Kenya). The 37.88-Mb draft genome sequence consists of 206 contigs, 12,311 predicted protein-coding sequences, and 261 tRNA sequences. This genome sequence contributes to our understanding of fungal-bacterial interactions during hexachlorocyclohexane degradation.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The organochlorine pesticide hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) was used for many years to control agricultural pests (1, 2). Despite a complete ban or severe restrictions on the use of HCH in many countries (3, 4), it continues to pose considerable environmental risks due to its toxicity, environmental persistence, and bioaccumulation in the food chain (2). HCH biodegradation as an effective bioremediation approach (5) has been studied extensively in bacteria (6) and white-rot fungi (79). At the same time, fewer data exist on degradation by non-white-rot fungi such as Fusarium species (2, 10).

Here, we present the genome sequence of Fusarium equiseti strain K3, isolated from HCH-contaminated Kenyan soil from a former storage site at Kitengela, Kenya (01.49 S, 37.048 E), highly contaminated by organochloride pesticide (11). We identified our strain as F. equiseti based on a phylogenetic tree constructed using internal transcribed spacer 1, the 5.8S rRNA gene, and internal transcribed spacer 2 (complete sequence) and the large subunit rRNA gene (partial sequence) (Fig. 1). The fungus was isolated on minimum salt medium (MSM) agar plates (12) supplemented with 100 μg/ml γ-HCH in an inverted agar plate microcosm system described by Bravo et al. (13). An axenic fungal colony was obtained by subsequent repeated plating on 1:10 diluted potato dextrose agar supplemented with 100 μg/ml γ-HCH. The fungus’ low HCH degradation capacity was demonstrated in MSM medium as previously described by Sagar et al. (10).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Phylogenetic tree showing the evolutionary relationship of Fusarium equiseti strain K3 (GenBank accession number MK734071.1) within the Fusarium equiseti clade, based on internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1), 5.8S rRNA gene sequences. The tree was constructed using MrBayes, a program for the Bayesian inference of phylogeny that is based on the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. Numbers at the nodes show percentages of posterior probabilities (derived from 1,000 samples), indicating the topological robustness of the tree. Phanerochaete sordida strain HHB-9871-sp was used as an outgroup to root the tree.

Mycelium obtained from an agar plate overgrown with the fungus was used for DNA extraction using a Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, USA) and quantified applying a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). A NEBNext Ultra II FS DNA library prep kit (New England Biolabs, USA) was used to prepare a paired-end 300-bp library for genome sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform according to the manufacturer’s instructions, generating a total of 2,602,796 paired-end reads. We used Sickle v1.33 (14), with a Phred quality score of >30, to control quality and trim the sequences. De novo sequence assembly was performed using SPAdes v3.15.2 (15), while QUAST v5.0.2 (16) and BUSCO v5.0.0 (17), with the fungi_odb10 database, were used for a quality check and to provide completeness of the gene content within the assembly. Genome annotation was performed via the MAKER v2.31.11 pipeline (18) using AUGUSTUS v.3.4.0 (19), and SNAP v2013_11_29 (20) was used for ab initio gene prediction, with Fusarium graminearum PH-1 (GenBank accession number AACM00000000.2) as the training species. Unless otherwise stated, default parameter settings were applied for all software used.

The genome assembly of F. equiseti strain K3 resulted in 206 contigs with a total length of 37,882,472 bp (N50 contig length, 601,073 bp; GC content, 48.03%). The draft genome consists of 12,311 predicted protein-coding sequences. Analysis of the predicted protein-coding sequences using BUSCO (17) and the fungi_odb10 database (total of 758 genes) resulted in 749 (98.8%) complete single-copy genes, 3 (0.4%) complete duplicated genes, 3 (0.4%) fragmented genes, and 3 (0.4%) missing genes. A total of 261 tRNA genes were predicted using ARAGORN v1.2.36 (21). To gain insight into the F. equiseti strain K3 secondary metabolism, we used antiSMASH v6.0.0 (22) to predict the secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters with the “fungi taxon” option. A total of 34 putative biosynthetic gene clusters previously reported for other Fusarium species were predicted. These included clusters likely to produce polyketides (2325), terpenes (25, 26), and nonribosomal peptides (2729).

The availability of the genome sequence of F. equiseti K3, together with ongoing efforts to understand its interactions with HCH-degrading bacteria, may provide invaluable insights into the use of fungal-bacterial cocultures for enhanced bioremediation of organic pollutants such as HCH (30).

Data availability.

We deposited the F. equiseti K3 internal transcribed spacer 1, 5.8S rRNA gene, and internal transcribed spacer 2 (complete sequence) and large subunit rRNA gene (partial sequence) at ENA/DDBJ/GenBank under the accession number MK734071.1. We deposited the F. equiseti K3 whole-genome shotgun project at ENA/DDBJ/GenBank under the accession number CAJSTJ000000000.1. The version described here is the first version. The raw data are available at the ENA Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject accession number PRJEB39686, BioSample accession number SAMEA7112172, and SRA accession number ERR4398881.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The Helmholtz Association supported this project through the Helmholtz Young Investigator grant NG-1248 Micro “Big Data.” N. Khan was supported by funding from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and a grant from the International Federation of Science (IFS grant W/5798-1).

We thank Birgit Würz, Jana Reichenbach, and Rita Remer for skilled experimental help.

Contributor Information

Ulisses Nunes da Rocha, Email: ulisses.rocha@ufz.de.

Antonis Rokas, Vanderbilt University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gvozdenac S, Inđić D, Vuković S, Marković N, Takač A. 2014. Phyto-indicators in detection of lindane residues in water. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci 79:545–551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.de Guillén-Jiménez FM, Cristiani-Urbina E, Cancino-Díaz JC, Flores-Moreno JL, Barragán-Huerta BE. 2012. Lindane biodegradation by the Fusarium verticillioides AT-100 strain, isolated from Agave tequilana leaves: kinetic study and identification of metabolites. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 74:36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.04.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barriada-Pereira M, González-Castro MJ, Muniategui-Lorenzo S, López-Mahía P, Prada-Rodríguez D, Fernández-Fernández E. 2005. Organochlorine pesticides accumulation and degradation products in vegetation samples of a contaminated area in Galicia (NW Spain). Chemosphere 58:1571–1578. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mertens B, Boon N, Verstraete W. 2005. Stereospecific effect of hexachlorocyclohexane on activity and structure of soil methanotrophic communities. Environ Microbiol 7:660–669. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00735.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang W, Lin Z, Pang S, Bhatt P, Chen S. 2020. Insights into the biodegradation of lindane (γ-hexachlorocyclohexane) using a microbial system. Front Microbiol 11:522. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lal R, Pandey G, Sharma P, Kumari K, Malhotra S, Pandey R, Raina V, Kohler H-PE, Holliger C, Jackson C, Oakeshott JG. 2010. Biochemistry of microbial degradation of hexachlorocyclohexane and prospects for bioremediation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74:58–80. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00029-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Singh BK, Kuhad RC. 1999. Biodegradation of lindane (γ-hexachlorocyclohexane) by the white-rot fungus Trametes hirsutus. Lett Appl Microbiol 28:238–241. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00508.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Singh BK, Kuhad RC. 2000. Degradation of insecticide lindane (γ-HCH) by white-rot fungi Cyathus bulleri and Phanerochaete sordida. Pest Manag Sci 56:142–146. doi:. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bumpus JA, Tien M, Wright D, Aust SD. 1985. Oxidation of persistent environmental pollutants by a white rot fungus. Science 228:1434–1436. doi: 10.1126/science.3925550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sagar V, Singh DP. 2011. Biodegradation of lindane pesticide by non-white-rots soil fungus Fusarium sp. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1747–1754. doi: 10.1007/s11274-010-0628-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Klánová J, Cupr P, Holoubek I, Borůvková J, Pribylová P, Kares R, Tomsej T, Ocelka T. 2009. Monitoring of persistent organic pollutants in Africa. Part 1: passive air sampling across the continent in 2008. J Environ Monit 11:1952–1963. doi: 10.1039/b913415h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Senoo K, Wada H. 1989. Isolation and identification of an aerobic γ-HCH-decomposing bacterium from soil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 35:79–87. doi: 10.1080/00380768.1989.10434739. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bravo D, Cailleau G, Bindschedler S, Simon A, Job D, Verrecchia E, Junier P. 2013. Isolation of oxalotrophic bacteria able to disperse on fungal mycelium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 348:157–166. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Joshi N, Fass JN. 2011. Sickle: a sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files, version 1.33. https://github.com/najoshi/sickle.
  • 15.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2015. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cantarel BL, Korf I, Robb SMC, Parra G, Ross E, Moore B, Holt C, Sánchez Alvarado A, Yandell M. 2008. MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res 18:188–196. doi: 10.1101/gr.6743907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stanke M, Keller O, Gunduz I, Hayes A, Waack S, Morgenstern B. 2006. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res 34:W435–W439. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Korf I. 2004. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 5:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-5-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N, Lee SY, Medema MH, Weber T. 2019. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W81–W87. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Janevska S, Arndt B, Niehaus E-M, Burkhardt I, Rösler SM, Brock NL, Humpf H-U, Dickschat JS, Tudzynski B. 2016. Gibepyrone biosynthesis in the rice pathogen Fusarium fujikuroi is facilitated by a small polyketide synthase gene cluster. J Biol Chem 291:27403–27420. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.753053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Studt L, Wiemann P, Kleigrewe K, Humpf H-U, Tudzynski B. 2012. Biosynthesis of fusarubins accounts for pigmentation of Fusarium fujikuroi perithecia. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4468–4480. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00823-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Miyamoto Y, Masunaka A, Tsuge T, Yamamoto M, Ohtani K, Fukumoto T, Gomi K, Peever TL, Tada Y, Ichimura K, Akimitsu K. 2010. ACTTS3 encoding a polyketide synthase is essential for the biosynthesis of ACT-toxin and pathogenicity in the tangerine pathotype of Alternaria alternata. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23:406–414. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-4-0406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brock NL, Huss K, Tudzynski B, Dickschat JS. 2013. Genetic dissection of sesquiterpene biosynthesis by Fusarium fujikuroi. Chembiochem 14:311–315. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201200695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bonsch B, Belt V, Bartel C, Duensing N, Koziol M, Lazarus CM, Bailey AM, Simpson TJ, Cox RJ. 2016. Identification of genes encoding squalestatin S1 biosynthesis and in vitro production of new squalestatin analogues. Chem Commun (Camb) 52:6777–6780. doi: 10.1039/c6cc02130a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wollenberg RD, Saei W, Westphal KR, Klitgaard CS, Nielsen KL, Lysøe E, Gardiner DM, Wimmer R, Sondergaard TE, Sørensen JL. 2017. Chrysogine biosynthesis is mediated by a two-module nonribosomal peptide synthetase. J Nat Prod 80:2131–2135. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sims JW, Fillmore JP, Warner DD, Schmidt EW. 2005. Equisetin biosynthesis in Fusarium heterosporum. Chem Commun (Camb):186–188. doi: 10.1039/b413523g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Espinosa-Ortiz EJ, Rene ER, Gerlach R. 2021. Potential use of fungal-bacterial co-cultures for the removal of organic pollutants. Crit Rev Biotechnol:1–23. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2021.1940831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

We deposited the F. equiseti K3 internal transcribed spacer 1, 5.8S rRNA gene, and internal transcribed spacer 2 (complete sequence) and large subunit rRNA gene (partial sequence) at ENA/DDBJ/GenBank under the accession number MK734071.1. We deposited the F. equiseti K3 whole-genome shotgun project at ENA/DDBJ/GenBank under the accession number CAJSTJ000000000.1. The version described here is the first version. The raw data are available at the ENA Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject accession number PRJEB39686, BioSample accession number SAMEA7112172, and SRA accession number ERR4398881.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES