Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2021 Nov 24;87(24):e01588-21. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01588-21

Identification of a MarR Subfamily That Regulates Arsenic Resistance Genes

Yanshuang Yu a, Jichen Chen b, Yuanping Li a, Jinxuan Liang a, Zhenchen Xie a, Renwei Feng a, Hend A Alwathnani c, Barry P Rosen d, Anne Grove e, Jian Chen d,f,, Christopher Rensing a,f,
Editor: Charles M Dozoisg
PMCID: PMC8612249  PMID: 34613763

ABSTRACT

In this study, comprehensive analyses were performed to determine the function of an atypical MarR homolog in Achromobacter sp. strain As-55. Genomic analyses of Achromobacter sp. As-55 showed that this marR is located adjacent to an arsV gene. ArsV is a flavin-dependent monooxygenase that confers resistance to the antibiotic methylarsenite [MAs(III)], the organoarsenic compound roxarsone(III) [Rox(III)], and the inorganic antimonite [Sb(III)]. Similar marR genes are widely distributed in arsenic-resistant bacteria. Phylogenetic analyses showed that these MarRs are found in operons predicted to be involved in resistance to inorganic and organic arsenic species, so the subfamily was named MarRars. MarRars orthologs have three conserved cysteine residues, which are Cys36, Cys37, and Cys157 in Achromobacter sp. As-55, mutation of which compromises the response to MAs(III)/Sb(III). GFP-fluorescent biosensor assays show that AdMarRars (MarR protein of Achromobacter deleyi As-55) responds to trivalent As(III) and Sb(III) but not to pentavalent As(V) or Sb(V). The results of RT-qPCR assays show that arsV is expressed constitutively in a marR deletion mutant, indicating that marR represses transcription of arsV. Moreover, electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) demonstrate that AdMarRars binds to the promoters of both marR and arsV in the absence of ligands and that DNA binding is relieved upon binding of As(III) and Sb(III). Our results demonstrate that AdMarRars is a novel As(III)/Sb(III)-responsive transcriptional repressor that controls expression of arsV, which confers resistance to MAs(III), Rox(III), and Sb(III). AdMarRars and its orthologs form a subfamily of MarR proteins that regulate genes conferring resistance to arsenic-containing antibiotics.

IMPORTANCE In this study, a MarR family member, AdMarRars was shown to regulate the arsV gene, which confers resistance to arsenic-containing antibiotics. It is a founding member of a distinct subfamily that we refer to as MarRars, regulating genes conferring resistance to arsenic and antimony antibiotic compounds. AdMarRars was shown to be a repressor containing conserved cysteine residues that are required to bind As(III) and Sb(III), leading to a conformational change and subsequent derepression. Here we show that members of the MarR family are involved in regulating arsenic-containing compounds.

KEYWORDS: arsenite, antimonite, methylarsenite, MarR, transcriptional repressor, regulator, ArsV

INTRODUCTION

Arsenic and antimony pollution have attracted considerable attention in recent years due to their adverse effect on the environment and human health (1). Although As and Sb pollution poses a health threat to humans, animals, and plants, some microorganisms survive in environments with high concentrations of these metalloids, and even utilize them for growth. These microbes have adapted metabolic pathways that incorporated As and Sb as electron donor or terminal electron acceptor or evolved mechanisms to confer resistance or detoxify them, thus playing a substantial role in the metalloid biogeochemical cycle (2, 3).

Active efflux of As and Sb out of the cytoplasm is the most common mechanism of metalloid resistance in bacteria (4). Such resistance is encoded in various ars operons found in many species of bacteria. These ars operons are carried on plasmids and chromosomes, and their expression is usually induced by As(III) and Sb(III) (5). Among proteins encoded on ars operons, ArsR was the first identified member of the family of ArsR/SmtB transcriptional repressors, regulating its expression and downstream ars genes. In the absence of arsenic, homodimeric ArsR binds to the promoter region of the operon to repress ars gene expression. In the presence of inducers such as As(III), Sb(III) (68), or MAs(III) (9), ArsR undergoes a conformational change and dissociates from the promoter DNA sequence, leading to expression of the operon. The most common ars operons contain an arsR gene, an arsC gene encoding an As(V) reductase, and a gene encoding an As(III) efflux permease, usually either arsB or acr3 (68, 10). Additional common genes include arsA encoding an arsenic ATPase subunit ArsA (11), and arsD encoding an arsenite chaperone that delivers As(III) to the ArsAB transporter complex (12). Additional less common ars genes have been discovered, including arsH, encoding an organoarsenical oxidase (13), arsI, encoding an MAs(III) demethylase (14), arsN, which encodes an N-acetyltranferase that confers resistance to the arsenic antibiotic arsinothricin (15), arsO, encoding a putative flavin-binding monooxygenase (16), arsJ, which confers arsenate resistance together with GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) (17), arsP, encoding a methylarsenite efflux permease (18), arsV, encoding an NADPH-dependent flavin monooxygenase (19), macAB, encoding an ABC-type efflux protein (20), and arsTX, conferring functions related to thioredoxin metabolism (21). It is likely that more ars genes await discovery.

MarR, first identified in Escherichia coli, is a transcriptional repressor phylogenetically unrelated to ArsR (22, 23). It is a multi-antibiotic-resistance regulator that functions as a homodimer, with a characteristic winged helix-turn-helix (wHTH) as the DNA binding motif in addition to a ligand-binding region (24). In the absence of inducer, MarR binds to its own gene promoter, repressing transcription of itself as well downstream genes organized in the same operon. After binding the ligand, MarR dissociates from the promoter region, enabling DNA transcription (25). MarR family proteins regulate functions involving antibiotic resistance and handling of oxidative stress, virulence factor production, catabolism of aromatic compounds, and as a master regulator in bacteria such as Burkholderia sp. (25). In addition, MarRs regulate catabolism of lignin and other substances and synthesis of antibiotics (26).

Some MarR family members interact with metals. The transcription of the zinc transporter operon (zit) in Lactococcus lactis is regulated by the MarR family transcriptional regulator ZitR. When the zinc concentration in the environment is too high, Zn(II) binds to ZitR and changes the conformation of ZitR to tightly bind to the zit promoter, thereby inhibiting the transcription of the zit operon and subsequently reducing transport of Zn into cells. Under Zn starvation, unliganded ZitR dissociates from the zit promoter sequence and relieves inhibition of the zit operon (27, 28). E. coli MarR is a prototypical member of the MarR family. MarR proteins typically regulate small regulons, typically one or two operons encoding a specific function such as antibiotic efflux in the marRAB operon. MarA then functions as an activator of many genes involved in a pleiotropic response. Cu(II) oxidizes a unique cysteine residue (Cys80 in E. coli MarR) in its DNA-binding domain, forming a disulfide bond between two MarR dimers, producing a conformational change that renders it unable to bind to the marRAB promoter, thereby derepressing expression of the marRAB operon (29).

To date, As/Sb has not been shown to regulate any member of the MarR family. In this study, we analyzed the genome of the highly arsenite-resistant bacterium Achromobacter deleyi As-55 (MIC 36 mM) (GenBank accession number: CP074375.1), which was isolated from a corn farm soil near an antimony mine in Lengshuijiang, Hunan Province, China. We identified and characterized a marR gene adjacent to an ars/aio operon and analyzed the As-55 AdMarRars protein at the molecular and genetic levels.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Genes for MarR orthologs are widely distributed in ars operons.

Examination of the Achromobacter sp. strain As-55 genome identified a marR-like gene near an aio/ars operon. Genes annotated as a marR were also located in predicted ars operons of other arsenic-resistant bacteria (Fig. 1). These marR genes are present upstream of an arsV gene in Paenibacillus sp. NC1, Roseateles aquatilis, Ktedonobacter racemifer DSM 44963, Luteitalea pratensis, and Eoetvoesia caeni or located upstream of an arsN gene in Duganella sp. CF458, Chloroflexi bacterium 54-19, Ktedonobacter racemifer DSM 44963, Deinococcus sp. YIM 77859, and Tahibacter aquaticus. This association suggests that this particular type of MarR regulates expression of arsV, arsP, and arsN. These MarR proteins form a distinct subfamily within the MarR family that we renamed for clarity as MarRars (Fig. 2). Interestingly, MarRars is predicted to regulate expression of genes that have previously been shown to confer resistance to the arsenic-containing antibiotics such as MAs(III) and arsenothricin (15, 30), in keeping with the overall role of MarRs as regulators of antibiotic resistance (24).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

marRars genes distributed in ars operons from different organisms. Shown are representative ars operons (accession numbers in parentheses) containing marR genes (black fill). Achromobacter sp. As-55 (NZ_CP074375.1), Paenibacillus sp. NC1 (NZ_QEVW01000012.1), Rhizobacter sp. Root404 (NZ_LMDS01000005.1), Roseateles aquatilis (NZ_NIOF01000003.1), Duganella sp. CF458 (NZ_FOOF01000005.1), Chloroflexi bacterium 54-19 (MKTJ01000032.1), Ktedonobacter racemifer DSM 44963 (NZ_ADVG01000002.1), Clostridium homopropionicum (NZ_FOOL01000002.1), Deinococcus sp. YIM 77859 (NZ_JQNI01000004.1), Luteitalea pratensis (NZ_CP015136.1), Eoetvoesia caeni (NZ_JACCEU010000005.1), Brevibacillus sp. OK042 (NZ_FORT01000019.1), Tahibacter aquaticus (NZ_SNZH01000010.1).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed based on MarR proteins from different bacteria. AdMarRars from Achromobacter sp. As-55 is indicated with an asterisk. The bootstrap values (based on 1,000 replications) are indicated at the branch nodes. GenBank accession numbers are shown after each protein. The bar represents 0.2 amino acid substitution per site.

AdMarRars is an As(III)/Sb(III)-responsive transcriptional repressor.

A marRars deletion mutant (ΔmarRars) of Achromobacter sp. As-55 was generated, and the expression of the adjacent arsV gene was examined by RT-qPCR (Fig. 3). Expression of arsV was upregulated in wild type cells by 0.2 and 2 mM As(III) or 0.05 and 0.2 mM Sb(III) compared to the wild type As-55 with no addition of metalloids. In ΔmarRars cells, arsV was highly expressed even in the absence of metalloids, demonstrating that AdMarRars functions as a repressor of arsV and that the metalloids bind to AdMarRars leading to conformational change and release of AdMarRars and subsequent depression. Consistent with constitutively high expression of arsV in ΔmarRars cells, the marRars deletion conferred resistance to roxarsone (Fig. 4). Rox(III) was shown to be much more toxic than Rox(V). Wild type cells were unable to grow in 16 μM Rox(III), while cells of A. deleyi ΔmarRars grew in 16 μM Rox(III). While both strains were able to grow at 1.6 mM Rox(V) (not shown), only the A. deleyi ΔmarRars grew in 3.2 mM Rox(V). It is conceivable that at high concentrations of Rox(V), small amounts of Rox(V) were reduced to Rox(III), thereby generating toxicity. Reduced organoarsenicals are more toxic than the oxidized species, and resistance against MAs(III) and Rox(III) can be achieved by oxidation to MAs(V) and Rox(V) (31). Reduced organoarsenicals are generally more toxic than As(III) and were proposed to have been antibiotics since early Earth (32). As noted above, arsV is predicted to encode a flavin-dependent oxidoreductase oxidizing MAs(III) (19). Other genes in the vicinity of marRars were shown not to be regulated by MarRars indicating only marR and arsV were regulated by MarRars (Fig. S1 and S2).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Expression of arsV of Achromobacter sp. As-55 (WT) and marRars mutant (ΔmarRars) under As(III)/Sb(III) exposure. WT As 0.2/As 2: Achromobacter sp. As-55 under 0.2/2 mM As(III) exposure; WT Sb 0.05/Sb 0.2: Achromobacter sp. As-55 under 0.05/0.2 mM Sb(III) exposure; ΔmarR As/Sb 0: marRars mutant without metal added; ΔmarR As 0.2/As 2: marRars mutant under 0.2/2 mM As(III) exposure; ΔmarR Sb 0.2/As 2: marRars mutant under 0.05/0.2 mM Sb(III) exposure. The log2(fold change) is reported relative to treatment of Achromobacter sp. As-55 (WT) with no metals added. Data presented are the means of three independent experiments, with error bars representing the SD.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Deletion of AdmarRars confers resistance to roxarsone. (A) Growth of WT and marRars mutant (ΔmarRars) in the absence of roxarsone. ΔmarRars displays resistance to Rox(V) (B) and Rox(III) (C) compared to wild type Achromobacter sp. As-55 (WT). The overnight culture was streaked on R2A solid medium containing 3.2 mM Rox(V) (B), 16 μM Rox(III) (C) and no roxarsone as control.

ArsV confers resistance to organoarsenicals.

To examine the function of the Achromobacter sp. As-55 arsV gene product, the gene was cloned into plasmid pTOPO, constructing plasmid pTOPO-arsV with arsV expressed under the universal Km promoter, which was expressed in the arsenic-sensitive E. coli strain AW3110Δars (33). Metalloid resistance was assayed by measuring growth and reporting OD600 after 1 day exposure to the indicated compounds. The strain containing pTOPO-arsV grew well in lysogeny broth (LB) medium containing 16 μM MAs(III), 4-8 mM Rox(V), or 8 μM Rox(III), while the strain containing the vector did not grow under the same conditions (Fig. 5), demonstrating that ArsV confers resistance to MAs(III), Rox(III), and Rox(V).

FIG 5.

FIG 5

ArsV conferred resistance to MAs(III), Rox(III), and Rox(V) in E. coli AW3110. Growth of E. coli AW3110 containing plasmid pTOPO or pTOPO-arsV was measured after the addition of different concentrations of MAs(III) (A), Rox(III) (B), Rox(V) (C) in liquid LB medium. The data are the averages of three independent replicates with standard deviation.

AdMarRars is derepressed by metalloids.

We hypothesized that AdMarRars is autoregulatory and controls expression of arsV. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were used to examine the interaction between AdMarRars and the regulatory DNA encompassing the non-coding region but also a small part of the coding region up and downstream of the arsV and marRars promoters. Purified AdMarRars was incubated with either Cy5.5-labeled marR promoter or arsV promoter, and electrophoretic mobility of the DNA-protein complexes were retarded compared to the free probe (Fig. 6). With increasing As(III) and Sb(III) concentrations, the electrophoretic shifts of the Cy5.5-labeled probes were gradually reduced, suggesting AdMarRars regulating expression of its own gene and arsV in a metalloid-dependent manner.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

AdMarRars binds arsV and marRars promoters. EMSAs with arsV promoter (A) and marRars promoter (B). Lanes 1: Cy5.5-labeled arsV/marRars promoter probe without AdMarRars protein; Lanes 2: Cy5.5-labeled arsV/marRars promoter probe with MarR protein; Lanes 3–5: Cy5.5-labeled arsV/marRars promoter probe with AdMarRars protein co-incubated with various amount of As(III); Lanes 6–9: Cy5.5-labeled arsV/marRars promoter probe with AdMarRars protein co-incubated with various amount of Sb(III). Representative of three replicates.

Role of conserved cysteine residues in the MarRars subfamily.

Based on the phylogenetic clustering patterns of MarRars proteins observed in the neighbor-joining tree (Fig. 2), we selected genes encoding MarR that were part of an ars operon and selected other representative members of the MarR family of regulators not involved in arsenic resistance. These putative MarRars repressors form a distinct subfamily within the MarR family. A multiple sequence alignment of these MarRars regulatory proteins shows that three cysteine residues (Cys36, Cys37, and Cys157) are conserved in AdMarRars (Fig. S3). Sb(III) binding, since cysteine triads/Sb(III) binding, since cysteine triads generally bind As(III) and Sb(III) in ArsR repressors (34), although their location in the primary sequences of the proteins vary (Fig. S4). A homology model of AdMarRars constructed using the MarR structure from Methanosarcina mazei Go1 (PDB ID: 3S2W) (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/3S2W) as a template indicates that they could form an As(III)/Sb(III) binding site in the folded repressor (Fig. S5). To examine the role of the conserved cysteine residues in MarRars function, Cys36, Cys37, and Cys157 were individually altered to serine residues by site-directed mutagenesis. We used a GFP biosensor strain (35) in which AdmarRars is under the control of the ara promoter and gfp is under the control of the AdmarRars promoter; in cells expressing the C36S, C37S, C157S AdMarRars variants, gfp expression was compared with cells expressing wild type AdMarRars following exposure to 0, 10, 20, 30, or 40 μM As(III) (Fig. 7A). The fluorescence intensity increased with increasing concentrations of As(III). The fluorescence intensity of the cells expressing wild type AdMarRars was much higher than the three mutants, consistent with a loss of As(III) binding by the mutants. In addition, AdMarRars responded to As(III) and Sb(III), but not to As(V) or Sb(V) (Fig. 7B). These findings indicate thiolate-dependent binding due to the soft-metal character of both As(III) and Sb(III) and in analogy to ArsR specificity would be predicted to be achieved by resulting conformational change, not by affinity.

FIG 7.

FIG 7

(A) Binding of As(III) to AsMarRars involves specific cysteine residues. Expression of the gfp reporter gene was assayed as described in materials and methods. GFP induction of cysteine mutants (C36S, C37S, C157S) and AdMarRars (WT) with increasing concentration of As(III). (B) GFP induction with different inducers of AdMarRars in Achromobacter sp. As-55. Comparison of the response of the bacterial biosensor to arsenic and antimony. Data presented are the means of three independent experiments, with error bars representing the SD.

Conclusions.

The results of this study support our hypothesis that AdMarRars is an As(III)/Sb(III)-responsive transcriptional regulator. It regulates genes that confer resistance to the antibiotic MAs(III) such as arsV, which encodes a flavin-dependent monooxygenase that oxidizes highly toxic MAs(III) to relatively nontoxic MAs(V). Genes for MarRars orthologs are widely distributed in bacteria, indicating that the regulatory function mediated by MarRars is a common mechanism for control of ars operons and gene islands involved in resistance to arsenic-containing antibiotics in bacteria. Chemical warfare using arsenic-containing compounds appears to be of ancient origin in microbes. Whether MarRars-dependent regulation is of ancient or relatively more recent origin remains to be determined. This finding enriches our knowledge about the regulation of genes that confer bacterial resistance to a wide variety of arsenic and antimony compounds.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains, plasmids, and primers.

Strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study are listed in Table 1. Achromobacter sp. As-55 and the ΔmarRars mutant were cultured at 28°C aerobically in R2A medium (36). E. coli AW3110 (DE3) [Δars::cam F2IN(rrn-rrnE)] bearing plasmids was grown aerobically in low phosphate medium (37) at 37°C supplemented with the required antibiotics. CV17-Zero Background pTOPO-Blunt Simple Cloning Kit was purchased from Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd (Beijing, China) for construction of deletions. Plasmids pACYC184-PmarRars-gfp and pBAD-AdmarRars were constructed for biosensor assay (35). Primers of target genes used for RT-qPCR were designed using software Beacon designer 8.1.

TABLE 1.

Strains, plasmids and primers used in this study

Strains, plasmids, and primers Description or sequence (5′ to 3′) Source or use
Strains
 Achromobacter deleyi As-55 Wild type, arsenite-oxidizing strain This study
ΔmarRars Deletion of marRars in Achromobacter deleyi As-55 This study
 E. coli AW3110 ΔarsRBC::cam F-IN(rrn-rrnE) Lab stock
Plasmids
pTOPO-Blunt sample Ampr, clone, and expression vector Gene deletion
pBAD/myc-His A Ampr, expression vector Biosensor assay
 pACYC184 Cmr, TCr, expression vector Biosensor assay
Primers
 marR-F GCCAGCCGAATTGTTGATT RT-qPCR
 marR-R AATGGTCTGATATAGCTCGTGTC RT-qPCR
 arsV-F CATACACCACGCCGAACTG RT-qPCR
 arsV-R CCTCCTCCAATGACCAAGACT RT-qPCR
MFS1-F GAGCCGAGATGCCTATGGA RT-qPCR
MFS1-R AGGACAGCCACTACAAGGAT RT-qPCR
 arsO-F GCTTCTGGATGCCGAGAC RT-qPCR
 arsO-R CGCCGTTCATACTGTGAGAG RT-qPCR
 aioA-F GCCATTCGCCATAACGCTAA RT-qPCR
 aioA-R TGACCACGCACTCCTTGT RT-qPCR
 aioX-F AAGAGGTGCGATTCGTTCAG RT-qPCR
 aioX-R CGGCGTTCAGGACATAGG RT-qPCR
 pstS1-F TGTTATCGGCGGCGTAGT RT-qPCR
 pstS1-R CGGATTCAGGTCAGCAATGG RT-qPCR
 bHp-F GGCATTCTCATTCACGCACAT RT-qPCR
 bHp-R GCTCGCTCCATCTCCTTCA RT-qPCR
KCMarFF CAGTGCTGTTGATTGGCGAAT marRars deletion
KCMarFR CATCGATGATGGTTGAGAAGCGTTTCCAGGGCGTAG marRars deletion
KCMarBF CAACGAGCCGATCGCTGAAGCCCGAGGTACTGGATG marRars deletion
KCMarBR TGCCACGACTATTTCATCAACA marRars deletion
TetF TCTCAACCATCATCGATGAATTG marRars deletion
TetR TCAGCGATCGGCTCGTTGCCCTGC marRars deletion
marR-F1 ATGGATCAGAGCACAAGGCGCCCT Deletion verification
marR-R1 CTACGGCTGCGGATCGGCAGCATA Deletion verification
M13F-Cy5.5 TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT EMSA
 marR-P-R GGGCGCCTTGTGCTCTGATCCAT EMSA
 arsV-P-R ATAGGAAGATCATTCTTGTTCAT EMSA

Distribution and sequence alignment of MarRars and phylogenetic analysis.

The genome of Achromobacter sp. As-55 was sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. A putative marR gene was identified adjacent to an ars/aio operon in the draft genome of strain As-55 by functional gene annotation of Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) (38). Acquisition of AdMarRars (MarRars protein of Achromobacter sp. As-55) homologous sequences was performed by searching a list of reference organisms or from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) protein database using a BLASTP search (39). Multiple alignment of MarR homologs sequence was performed using Clustal Omega (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). Phylogenetic analysis was performed to infer the evolutionary relationship among the representative marR adjacent or unrelated to ars/aio operons from various organisms. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method with MEGA 6.0.1 (40). The statistical significance of the branch pattern was estimated by conducting a bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replications.

Deletion of marRars in Achromobacter sp. As-55.

Homologous recombination was used to delete marR. In detail, two primer pairs of KCMarFF/KCMarFR and KCMarBF/KCMarBR were used to amplify the upstream and downstream sequence of marR respectively with genomic DNA of strain As-55 as template. Primers TetF and TetR were used to amplify the tetracycline resistance gene sequence (Table 1). Then the three sequences were assembled with primers KCMarFF and KCMarBR by overlap PCR. The assembled sequence contained the upstream sequence of marR, tetracycline resistance gene sequence, and the downstream sequence of marR. The PCR product of the assembled sequence was purified with a DNA Fragment purification kit (TaKaRa, Dalian of China) and eluted with ddH2O, then 10 μl of the purified sequence was added into 100 μl of competent cell of strain As-55, and electroporation used a Gene Pulser Xcell (BIO-RAD) with 0.1 cm electroporation cuvettes (Cat: 1652083, BIO-RAD) at 25 μF, 200 Ohm, and 1800 V. Agar plates of lysogeny broth medium (41) containing 15 mg L−1 of tetracycline were used for selecting positive transformants. Primers of marR-F1 and marR-R1 were used for marR deletion verification.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays.

The DNA fragments of the marRars promoter and arsV promoter were amplified using two pairs of M13FCy5.5/marR-P-R and M13FCy5.5/arsV-P-R. All reaction mixtures were incubated at room temperature at dark condition in EMSA/Gel-Shift Binding Buffer (5×) (poly(dI-dC), DTT, glycerol, EDTA, NaCl, MgCl2, and Tris) for 20 min. Before being loaded onto a 6% PAGE gel, the binding solution was mixed with EMSA/Gel Shift Loading Buffer. After 2–3 h of running at 60 V in 0.5 × TBE buffer, the gels were exposed in an imaging system (ODYSSEY CLx).

Metalloid resistance assays.

The Achromobacter sp. As-55 arsV gene was cloned and expressed in arsenic-hypersensitive strain E. coli AW3110 (ΔarsRBC). For metalloid resistance assays in liquid media, AW3110 cells bearing vector plasmid pTOPO or pTOPO-arsV were grown overnight with shaking at 37°C in LB containing 100 mg L−1 ampicillin (Amp). The overnight cultures were inoculated into fresh LB medium with 100 mg L−1 Amp containing various concentrations of metal(loid)s and incubated at 37°C with shaking for 24 h. The growth conditions were estimated using absorbance at OD600 nm. For metalloid resistance assays with wild type As-55 and marRars mutant ΔmarRars, cells were streaked on R2A solid media containing different concentrations of metal(loid)s [As(III), Sb(III), Rox(III), Rox(V), Pb(II), Cu(II), Zn(II)].

Total RNA extraction and RT-qPCR.

A single colony of both strain As-55 and of mutant ΔmarRars was incubated in R2A medium overnight. The cultures were diluted to an A600nm of 0.01 into 30 ml of fresh R2A medium. When the A600nm reached 0.5, 0.2 and 2 mM As(III) or 0.05 and 0.2 mM Sb(III) were added, with no metal addition used as control. After incubation for 2 h, 1.5 ml of cells were harvested by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 2 min. Total RNA were extracted using a TRIzol method (36), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA concentrations were quantified using a BioDrop Spectrophotometer (Biochrom Ltd, UK) and were diluted to appropriate concentrations before reverse transcription. cDNA was prepared by reverse-transcription PCR using HiScript III RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) (Vazyme #R323, China). Briefly, gDNA contaminants present in the RNA samples were removed by treatment with 4 × gDNA wiper for 2 min at 42°C, followed by reaction of 5 × HiScript III qRT SuperMix by following a program of 37°C for 15 min and 85°C for 5 sec. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed by using the QuantStudio 6 Flex real-time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with cDNA as the template. 16S rRNA of As-55 was used as an endogenous control. The relative expression was quantified according to the method of 2−ΔΔCT (42).

Construction of an AdMarRars homology model.

The homology model of AdMarRars was constructed using the fully automated protein structure homology modeling server SWISS-MODEL (43) (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/). Model quality was estimated based on the QMEAN scoring function. The model was built using the structure of MarR from Methanosarcina mazei Go1 (PDB ID: 3S2W) as a template, the remainder was built using MODELLER without template with lower confidence. The sequence similarity and identity between the model and template are 30.0 and 20.9%, respectively. The SWISS-MODEL built residues from 10 to 148. The remaining residues from 149 to 163 were built using MODELLER program in CHIMERA software. PyMOL v1.6 was used to visualize the structural models (44) (https://www.pymol.org/citing).

Mutagenesis of cysteine residues.

Mutations in AdMarRars were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis using QuikChange II site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The mutagenic oligonucleotides used for both strands and the respective changes introduced (underlined) are as follows: C36SF: 5′-CCGCGATCGTGATCGCATTAGCTGCTATGACG-3′ and C36SR: 5′-CGTCATAGCAGCTAATGCGATCACGATCGCGG-3′; C37SF: 5′-ATCGTGATCGCATTTGCAGCTATGACGTTTCGGTA-3′ and C37SR: 5′-TACCGAAACGTCATAGCTGCAAATGCGATCACGAT-3′; C157SF: 5′-TGTCGCCTCCACAAGTGCTGCCGATCC-3′ and C157SR: 5′-GGATCGGCAGCACTTGTGGAGGCGACA-3′. Each mutation was confirmed by commercial DNA sequencing (Sequetech, Mountain View, CA).

Plasmid construction and assay of AdMarRars substrate binding in vivo.

AdMarRars transcriptional activity was estimated from inducer-responsive biosensor activity measured by gfp expression (38). A marR gene corresponding to the mRNA sequence of the gene for AdMarRars (QVQ28260.1) in NCBI (CP074375.1) was chemically synthesized with 5′ NcoI and 3′ SalI sites and with codon optimization for expression in E. coli (GenScript, NJ, USA) and subcloned into expression vector pBAD/myc-His A (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) that produces a fusion six-histidine tag at the end. The AdmarRars promoter was chemically synthesized and subcloned into expression vector pACYC184 (NEB, United States), generating plasmid pACYC184-PmarRars-gfp (Fig. S6A). All the constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing (Sequetech, Mountain View, CA). Cultures of the biosensor (E. coli strain AW3110 bearing plasmids pBAD-AdmarRars, where the marRars gene is under the control of the arabinose promoter, and pACYC184-PmarR-gfp, where the marRars promoter is fused to a gfp gene) were grown to mid-exponential phase in low phosphate medium at 37°C with 100 μg ml−1 ampicillin and 34 μg ml−1 chloramphenicol with shaking. Glycerol (0.5%) was added for constitutive expression of gfp. The AdmarRars gene was induced by addition of 0.2% arabinose for 5 h. Derepression was generated by simultaneous addition of arabinose and arsenicals for 5 h. Cell densities were normalized by dilution or suspension to the same A600nm, and expression of gfp was assayed from the fluorescence of cells using a Photon Technology International spectrofluorometer with an excitation wavelength. The GFP induction condition is shown in Fig. S6B.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770123 and 22072017), the International Cooperation Science Foundation of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (no. KXGH17013), and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian province (2018J01668) to C.R., NIH grants R35 GM136211 and R01 GM55425 to B.P.R., and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41967023) to Jian Chen. We also acknowledge the Researchers Supporting Project (RSP-2021/205), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 1
Fig. S1 to S6. Download aem.01588-21-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 2.5 MB (2.5MB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Jian Chen, Email: jianchen@fiu.edu.

Christopher Rensing, Email: rensing@iue.ac.cn.

Charles M. Dozois, INRS—Institut Armand-Frappier

REFERENCES

  • 1.Okkenhaug G, Zhu YG, He J, Li X, Luo L, Mulder J. 2012. Antimony (Sb) and arsenic (As) in Sb mining impacted paddy soil from Xikuangshan, China: differences in mechanisms controlling soil sequestration and uptake in rice. Environ Sci Technol 46:3155–3162. 10.1021/es2022472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang SY, Zhao FJ, Sun GX, Su JQ, Yang XR, Li H, Zhu YG. 2015. Diversity and abundance of arsenic biotransformation genes in paddy soils from southern China. Environ Sci Technol 49:4138–4146. 10.1021/acs.est.5b00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sun LN, Guo B, Lyu WG, Tang XJ. 2020. Genomic and physiological characterization of an antimony and arsenite-oxidizing bacterium Roseomonas rhizosphaerae. Environ Res 191:110136. 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yang H-C, Fu H-L, Lin Y-F, Rosen BP. 2012. Pathways of arsenic uptake and efflux. Curr Top Membr 69:325–358. 10.1016/B978-0-12-394390-3.00012-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rosen BP. 2002. Biochemistry of arsenic detoxification. FEBS Lett 529:86–92. 10.1016/s0014-5793(02)03186-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Shi K, Li C, Rensing C, Dai X, Fan X, Wang G. 2018. Efflux transporter arsK is responsible for bacterial resistance to arsenite, antimonite, trivalent roxarsone, and methylarsenite. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e01842-18. 10.1128/AEM.01842-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tisa LS, Rosen BP. 1990. Molecular characterization of an anion pump: the ArsB protein is the membrane anchor for the ArsA protein. J Biol Chem 265:190–194. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)40214-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li H, Li MS, Huang YY, Rensing C, Wang GJ. 2013. In silico analysis of bacterial arsenic islands reveals remarkable synteny and functional relatedness between arsenate and phosphate. Front Microbiol 4:347. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen J, Nadar VS, Rosen BP. 2017. A novel MAs(III)-selective ArsR transcriptional repressor. Mol Microbiol 106:469–478. 10.1111/mmi.13826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meng YL, Liu Z, Rosen BP. 2004. As(III) and Sb(III) uptake by GlpF and efflux by ArsB in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 279:18334–18341. 10.1074/jbc.M400037200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen CM, Misra TK, Silver S, Rosen BP. 1986. Nucleotide sequence of the structural genes for an anion pump. J Biol Chem 261:15030–15038. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)66824-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lin YF, Walmsley AR, Rosen BP. 2006. An arsenic metallochaperone for an arsenic detoxification pump. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:15617–15622. 10.1073/pnas.0603974103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen J, Bhattacharjee H, Rosen BP. 2015. ArsH is an organoarsenical oxidase that confers resistance to trivalent forms of the herbicide monosodium methylarsenate and the poultry growth promoter roxarsone. Mol Microbiol 96:1042–1052. 10.1111/mmi.12988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yoshinaga M, Rosen BP. 2014. A C-As lyase for degradation of environmental organoarsenical herbicides and animal husbandry growth promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:7701–7706. 10.1073/pnas.1403057111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nadar VS, Chen J, Dheeman DS, Galván AE, Yoshinaga-Sakurai K, Kandavelu P, Sankaran B, Kuramata M, Ishikawa S, Rosen BP, Yoshinaga M. 2019. Arsinothricin, an arsenic-containing non-proteinogenic amino acid analog of glutamate, is a broad-spectrum antibiotic. Commun Biol 2:131. 10.1038/s42003-019-0365-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang L, Chen S, Xiao X, Huang X, You D, Zhou X, Deng Z. 2006. arsRBOCT arsenic resistance system encoded by linear plasmid pHZ227 in Streptomyces sp. strain FR-008. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:3738–3742. 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3738-3742.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen J, Yoshinaga M, Garbinski LD, Rosen BP. 2016. Synergistic interaction of glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and ArsJ, a novel organoarsenical efflux permease, confers arsenate resistance. Mol Microbiol 100:945–953. 10.1111/mmi.13371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chen J, Madegowda M, Bhattacharjee H, Rosen BP. 2015. ArsP: a methylarsenite efflux permease. Mol Microbiol 98:625–635. 10.1111/mmi.13145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang J, Chen J, Wu YF, Wang ZP, Qiu JG, Li XL, Cai F, Xiao KQ, Sun XX, Rosen BP, Zhao FJ. 2021. Oxidation of organoarsenicals and antimonite by a novel flavin monooxygenase widely present in soil bacteria. Environ Microbiol 10.1111/1462-2920.15488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shi K, Cao M, Li C, Huang J, Zheng S, Wang G. 2019. Efflux proteins MacAB confer resistance to arsenite and penicillin/macrolide-type antibiotics in Agrobacterium tumefaciens 5A. World J Microb Biotechnol 35:115. 10.1007/s11274-019-2689-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Achour-Rokbani A, Cordi A, Poupin P, Bauda P, Billard P. 2010. Characterization of the ars gene cluster from extremely arsenic-resistant Microbacterium sp. strain A33. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:948–955. 10.1128/AEM.01738-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Seoane AS, Levy SB. 1995. Characterization of MarR, the repressor of the multiple antibiotic resistance (mar) operon in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 177:3414–3419. 10.1128/jb.177.12.3414-3419.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cohen SP, Hächler H, Levy SB. 1993. Genetic and functional analysis of the multiple antibiotic resistance (mar) locus in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 175:1484–1492. 10.1128/jb.175.5.1484-1492.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Beggs GA, Brennan RG, Arshad M. 2020. MarR family proteins are important regulators of clinically relevant antibiotic resistance. Protein Sci 29:647–653. 10.1002/pro.3769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gupta A, Pande A, Sabrin A, Thapa SS, Gioe BW, Grove A. 2019. MarR family transcription factors from Burkholderia species: hidden clues to control of virulence-associated genes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 83:e00039-18. 10.1128/MMBR.00039-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Grove A. 2017. Regulation of metabolic pathways by MarR family transcription factors. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 15:366–371. 10.1016/j.csbj.2017.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Llull D, Son O, Blanié S, Briffotaux J, Morello E, Rogniaux H, Danot O, Poquet L. 2011. Lactococcus lactis ZitR is a zinc-responsive repressor active in the presence of low, nontoxic zinc concentrations in vivo. J Bacteriol 193:1919–1929. 10.1128/JB.01109-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Varela PF, Velours C, Aumont-Niçaise M, Pineau B, Legrand P, Poquet I. 2019. Biophysical and structural characterization of a zinc-responsive repressor of the MarR superfamily. PLoS One 14:e0210123. 10.1371/journal.pone.0210123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhu RF, Hao ZY, Lou HB, Song YQ, Zhao JY, Chen YQ, Zhu JH, Chen PR. 2017. Structural characterization of the DNA-binding mechanism underlying the copper(II)-sensing MarR transcriptional regulator. J Biol Inorg Chem 22:685–689. 10.1007/s00775-017-1442-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chen J, Yoshinaga M, Rosen BP. 2019. The antibiotic action of methylarsenite is an emergent property of microbial communities. Mol Microbiol 111:487–494. 10.1111/mmi.14169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chen J, Zhang J, Rosen BP. 2021. Organoarsenical tolerance in Sphingobacterium wenxiniae, a bacterium isolated from activated sludge. Environ Microbiol 10.1111/1462-2920.15599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Li YP, Fekih IB, Fru EC, Moraleda-Munoz A, Li X, Rosen BP, Yoshinaga M, Rensing C. 2021. Antimicrobial Activity of Metals and Metalloids. Annu Rev Microbiol 75:175–197. 10.1146/annurev-micro-032921-123231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Carlin A, Shi W, Dey S, Rosen BP. 1995. The ars operon of Escherichia coli confers arsenical and antimonial resistance. J Bacteriol 177:981–986. 10.1128/jb.177.4.981-986.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Garbinski LD, Rosen BP, Chen J. 2019. Pathways of arsenic uptake and efflux. Environ Int 126:585–597. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Viswanathan T, Chen J, Wu M, An L, Kandavelu P, Sankaran B, Radhakrishnan M, Li M, Rosen BP. 2021. Functional and structural characterization of AntR, an Sb(III) responsive transcriptional repressor. Mol Microbiol 116:427–437. 10.1111/mmi.14721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang J, Chai CW, Thomasarrigo LK, Zhao SC, Kretzschmar R, Zhao FJ. 2020. Nitrite accumulation is required for microbial anaerobic iron oxidation, but not for arsenite oxidation, in two heterotrophic denitrifiers. Environ Sci Technol 54:4036–4045. 10.1021/acs.est.9b06702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Oden KL, Gladysheva TB, Rosen BP. 1994. Arsenate reduction mediated by the plasmid-encoded ArsC protein is coupled to glutathione. Mol Microbiol 12:301–306. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01018.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S, Madden TL. 2008. NCBIBLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res 36:W5–W9. 10.1093/nar/gkn201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729. 10.1093/molbev/mst197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2002. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kiefer F, Arnold K, Kunzli M, Bordoli L, Schwede T. 2009. The SWISS-MODEL Repository and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D387–D392. 10.1093/nar/gkn750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Delano EO, Ludlow JB, Ørstavik D, Tyndall D, Trope M. 2001. Comparison between PAI and quantitative digital radiographic assessment of apical healing after endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92:108–115. 10.1067/moe.2001.115466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1

Fig. S1 to S6. Download aem.01588-21-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 2.5 MB (2.5MB, pdf)


Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES