Skip to main content
Seminars in Interventional Radiology logoLink to Seminars in Interventional Radiology
. 2021 Nov 24;38(5):515–517. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1736530

A Review of Musculoskeletal Embolization to Treat Pain Outside of the Knee

Abin Sajan 1,, Sandeep Bagla 2, Ari Isaacson 3
PMCID: PMC8612834  PMID: 34853496

Abstract

Chronic inflammation leading to musculoskeletal pain has garnered interest in the past decade with the success of genicular artery embolization for knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis. Outside the knee joint, musculoskeletal embolization has been applied to other anatomical locations, mainly shoulder pain secondary to adhesive capsulitis and elbow pain secondary to lateral epicondylitis. The success of these early trials and other case reports highlights the efficacy of musculoskeletal embolization and its future potential.

Keywords: interventional radiology, musculoskeletal, pain, embolization


Many musculoskeletal conditions that cause pain and disability can be characterized by the presence of chronic inflammation. 1 2 In this milieu, mediators such as C-reactive protein, prostaglandins (PGE2), cytokines (TNF, IL-1B, IL-6, IL-15, IL-17, IL-18, and IL-21), leukotrienes (LKB4), growth factors (transforming growth factor-beta and vascular endothelial growth factor), complement proteins, and nitric oxide upregulate angiogenesis leading to abnormal hypervascularity. 3 Studies suggest that these abnormal vessels could activate neuropeptides resulting in subsequent nerve growth and chronic pain. 4 5 The purpose of embolization is to disrupt this inflammatory cycle and prevent the development of sensory nerves by targeting the hypervascularity. 6 7

This principle has been successfully applied to knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis (OA), as genicular artery embolization (GAE) was found to significantly reduce pain and increase function in patients with mild to moderate OA. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 The success of GAE for OA has led to the application of musculoskeletal embolization to other inflammatory conditions like adhesive capsulitis (AC), lateral epicondylitis (LE), and other isolated cases of tendinitis.

Adhesive Capsulitis

AC, also known as frozen shoulder, refers to the pathological formation of adhesions and scar tissue around the glenohumeral joint leading to pain and stiffness. It has an incidence of around 5% in the general population that rises to around 20% in patients with diabetes. 17 18 Although it is often described as self-limiting in 1 to 3 years, 20 to 50% of patients can develop long-lasting symptoms. 19 20

Okuno et al were the first to describe adhesive capsulitis embolization (ACE) to relieve symptoms in patients with AC. 21 In this study, seven patients underwent ACE with impinem/cilastatin, an antibiotic that crystallizes in solution to form temporary embolic particles. The six arteries of interest targeted were (1) suprascapular artery, (2) thoracoacromial artery, (3) coracoid branch, (4) circumflex scapular artery, (5) anterior circumflex humeral artery, and (6) posterior circumflex humeral artery. Selective angiography of these vessels was performed to evaluate for “tumor blush” ( Fig. 1 ). If present, embolization was performed very slowly with a dilute embolic solution until the “tumor blush” was no longer evident. At 6-month follow-up, there were significant improvements in mean visual analog score (VAS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Patients also reported no major adverse events.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Angiography in the anterior humeral circumflex artery that displays classic hypervascularity ( a ) with a postembolization angiography and return to normal anatomy ( b ).

The success of the initial study was confirmed by Okuno et al and Hwang et al who performed ACE in 8 and 25 patients, respectively. 22 23 Okuno et al had a 36-month follow-up with consistently significant VAS and ASES improvements compared to baseline at the short- and long-term follow-up end points. Reductions in analgesic use were also noted along with the absence of any major adverse events throughout the study period. Hwang et al presented similar data with improvements in shoulder pain and mobility after ACE. Fernández-Martinez et al reported on a larger cohort of 40 patients. 24 Like previous studies, significant improvements were noted in pain scores at 6-month follow-up. Small differences included femoral artery access for almost all patients and the use of detailed range of motion analysis. Bagla et al were the first to perform ACE in the Unites States and used a permanent embolic agent instead of the temporary antibiotic solution that had been used in the previous studies. 16 25 No major differences in AEs and outcomes were noted between the two agents.

The early data on ACE are encouraging and suggest that glenohumeral joint embolization is a safe and effective option for patients with AC resistant to conservative treatment. Future randomized control trials comparing ACE to sham embolization or orthopaedic intervention is necessary to establish ACE in the AC treatment algorithm.

Lateral Epicondylitis

LE or “tennis elbow” is a painful degenerative process involving the extensor carpi radialis brevis with an incidence of 1 to 3%. 26 27 While conservative management resolves the pain in most patients, 5 to 10% of patients can develop chronic symptoms. 28

Iwamoto et al were the first to perform embolization for pain secondary to LE refractory to conservative management . 29 Digital subtraction angiography of the brachial artery was performed to evaluate the radial recurrent artery, interosseous recurrent artery, and the radial collateral artery. Each vessel was checked for hypervascularity and embolized as necessary to decrease the “tumor blush.” Twenty-four patients underwent embolization with a 2-year follow-up. Significant improvements at 2 years were noted with VAS; Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE); and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires. Although a two-stage procedure intervention was part of the original study design, only eight patients required repeat embolization, as the others had complete resolution with no further symptoms.

Hwang et al confirmed the success of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for LE in seven patients and noted significant improvements in pain and elbow function. 23 Unlike the initial trial, Hwang et al were the first to use permanent embolic agents with successful results. There is an ongoing study by Okuno and Shibuya with a sample size of 52 patients that is pending for publication with initial results that are encouraging with significant improvements in outcomes that last almost 4 years after TAE. 30 No major AEs were noted and magnetic resonance imaging analysis 2 years after TAE confirmed lack of side effects. Overall, embolization is a promising minimally invasive option for patients with LE that is refractory to conservative management.

Tendonitis

There have been case reports of embolization for chronic pain secondary to tendonitis in various anatomic locations. Okuno et al described cases of embolization for patellar tendinopathy ( n  = 1), plantar fasciitis ( n  = 1), iliotibial band syndrome ( n  = 1), and Achilles tendinopathy ( n  = 1). 31 Like other musculoskeletal embolization, the procedures involved angiography of the local anatomy with identification of hypervascularity followed by embolization to treat the “tumor blush.” Okuno et al had 4-month follow-up for these patients who reported significant improvements in pain with limited AEs. Correa et al similarly used embolization to safely improve pain secondary to hip synovitis in one patient. 32

Although these individual cases are encouraging, they are limited to case reports. Further clinical and basic science investigation is needed to better understand how embolization affects the chronic inflammatory state that is the common tie to all of the described conditions.

Conclusion

With the recent publication of data supporting embolization for the treatment of knee pain secondary to OA, many investigators have attempted to obtain similar results in different anatomical locations that are affected by musculoskeletal inflammation. Although ACE and embolization for LE have the most data supporting their efficacy, the smattering of additional case reports suggests that we are just crossing the threshold of potential applications.

Disclosures

• S.B. is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Varian Medical Systems, Medtronic, Embolx, IMBiotechnologies, and Phillips Medical System.

• A.I. is a consultant for Terumo, ABK Biomedical, and CrannMed.

• No other disclosures or conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Ashraf S, Mapp P I, Walsh D A. Contributions of angiogenesis to inflammation, joint damage, and pain in a rat model of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(09):2700–2710. doi: 10.1002/art.30422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bonnet C S, Walsh D A. Osteoarthritis, angiogenesis and inflammation. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44(01):7–16. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Costa C, Incio J, Soares R. Angiogenesis and chronic inflammation: cause or consequence? Angiogenesis. 2007;10(03):149–166. doi: 10.1007/s10456-007-9074-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cui J, Lu W, He Y. Molecular biology of frozen shoulder-induced limitation of shoulder joint movements. J Res Med Sci. 2017;22:61. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_1005_16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mapp P I, Walsh D A. Mechanisms and targets of angiogenesis and nerve growth in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(07):390–398. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ewald A. Adhesive capsulitis: a review. Am Fam Physician. 2011;83(04):417–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Xu Y, Bonar F, Murrell G A. Enhanced expression of neuronal proteins in idiopathic frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(10):1391–1397. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.08.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bagla S, Piechowiak R, Hartman T, Orlando J, Del Gaizo D, Isaacson A. Genicular artery embolization for the treatment of knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31(07):1096–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bagla S, Piechowiak R, Sajan A, Orlando J, Canario A DH, Isaacson A. Angiographic analysis of the anatomical variants in genicular artery embolization. J Clin Intervent Radiol ISVIR. 2021 doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1729464. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Landers S, Hely R, Page R. Genicular artery embolization to improve pain and function in early-stage knee osteoarthritis-24-month pilot study results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31(09):1453–1458. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Little M W, Gibson M, Briggs J. Genicular artEry embolizatioN in patiEnts with oSteoarthrItiS of the Knee (GENESIS) using permanent microspheres: interim analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021;44(06):931–940. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02764-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sajan A, Bagla S, Isaacson A. Non-neoplastic disease outside the spine-genicular artery embolization and adhesive capsulitis embolization. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;23(04):100702. doi: 10.1016/j.tvir.2020.100702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lee S H, Hwang J H, Kim D H. Clinical outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolisation for chronic knee pain: mild-to-moderate versus severe knee osteoarthritis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(11):1530–1536. doi: 10.1007/s00270-019-02289-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Okuno Y, Korchi A M, Shinjo T, Kato S. Transcatheter arterial embolization as a treatment for medial knee pain in patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(02):336–343. doi: 10.1007/s00270-014-0944-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Okuno Y, Korchi A M, Shinjo T, Kato S, Kaneko T. Midterm clinical outcomes and MR imaging changes after transcatheter arterial embolization as a treatment for mild to moderate radiographic knee osteoarthritis resistant to conservative treatment. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(07):995–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sajan A, Isaacson A, Bagla S. Adhesive capsulitis embolization: a case of particle embolization for refractory shoulder pain secondary to adhesive capsulitis. J Radiol Nurs. 2021;40(02):136–138. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kingston K, Curry E J, Galvin J W, Li X. Shoulder adhesive capsulitis: epidemiology and predictors of surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(08):1437–1443. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Manske R C, Prohaska D.Diagnosis and management of adhesive capsulitis Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 20081(3-4):180–189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.D'Orsi G M, Via A G, Frizziero A, Oliva F. Treatment of adhesive capsulitis: a review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2012;2(02):70–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fernandes M R. Arthroscopic treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder with minimum follow up of six years. Acta Ortop Bras. 2015;23(02):85–89. doi: 10.1590/1413-78522015230200613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Okuno Y, Oguro S, Iwamoto W, Miyamoto T, Ikegami H, Matsumura N. Short-term results of transcatheter arterial embolization for abnormal neovessels in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a pilot study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(09):e199–e206. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Okuno Y, Iwamoto W, Matsumura N. Clinical outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization for adhesive capsulitis resistant to conservative treatment. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(02):161–1670. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hwang J H, Park S W, Kim K H. Early results of transcatheter arterial embolization for relief of chronic shoulder or elbow pain associated with tendinopathy refractory to conservative treatment. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(04):510–517. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fernández-Martínez A M, Alonso-Burgos A, López R, Cuesta Marcos M T, Baldi S. Clinical outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization for secondary stiff shoulder. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021;32(04):489–496. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bagla S, Piechowiak R, Nagda S. Arterial embolization of the shoulder for pain secondary to adhesive capsulitis: interim results from an investigational device exemption US trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31(03):S6–S7. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Degen R M, Conti M S, Camp C L, Altchek D W, Dines J S, Werner B C. Epidemiology and disease burden of lateral epicondylitis in the USA: analysis of 85,318 patients. HSS J. 2018;14(01):9–14. doi: 10.1007/s11420-017-9559-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shiri R, Viikari-Juntura E, Varonen H, Heliövaara M. Prevalence and determinants of lateral and medial epicondylitis: a population study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164(11):1065–1074. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sanders T L, Jr, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan A J, Ransom J E, Smith J, Morrey B F. The epidemiology and health care burden of tennis elbow: a population-based study. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(05):1066–1071. doi: 10.1177/0363546514568087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Iwamoto W, Okuno Y, Matsumura N, Kaneko T, Ikegami H. Transcatheter arterial embolization of abnormal vessels as a treatment for lateral epicondylitis refractory to conservative treatment: a pilot study with a 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(08):1335–1341. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Okuno Y, Shibuya M. Midterm clinical outcomes after transcatheter arterial embolization for lateral epicondylitis resistance to conservative treatment. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(03):S15. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Okuno Y, Matsumura N, Oguro S. Transcatheter arterial embolization using imipenem/cilastatin sodium for tendinopathy and enthesopathy refractory to nonsurgical management. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(06):787–792. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Correa M P, Puton R C, Saleh J N. Short-term follow-up of embolization of hip synovitis. CVIR Endovasc. 2020;3(01):35. doi: 10.1186/s42155-020-00126-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Seminars in Interventional Radiology are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES