Abstract
Radiation attenuated sporozoite (RAS) vaccination offers hope for global malaria control through induction of protective liver-stage-specific memory CD8 T cells. Effective RAS vaccination regimens exist; however, widespread implementation remains unfeasible. A key difficulty resides in the need to administer three or more doses intravenously to achieve sufficient immunity. Strategies to reduce the number of RAS doses are therefore desirable. Here we used mice to model human immune responses to a single, suboptimal weight-normalized RAS dose administered intravenously followed by subunit vaccination to amplify liver-stage-specific memory CD8 T cells. RAS-subunit prime-boost regimens increased the numbers of liver-stage-specific memory CD8 T cells to a level greater than present after one RAS vaccination. Both intravenous and intramuscular subunit vaccine delivery induced immunity in mice, and many vaccinated mice completely cleared liver infection. These findings are particularly relevant to human vaccine development because RAS-prime-subunit-boost vaccination would reduce the logistical challenges of multiple RAS-only immunizations.
INTRODUCTION
Plasmodium, the causative agent of malaria, infects millions of people annually and causes hundreds of thousands of deaths (1). Anti-malarial interventions such as insecticides and medications are problematic with regards to access and compliance (2, 3). Additionally troublesome is the tendency of mosquitos and parasites to develop resistance to chemical agents (4). Thus, efficacious malaria vaccines are of critical importance.
Successful vaccine development relies on understanding the parasite life cycle in the human. After being delivered to the host skin by infected mosquito bite, Plasmodium parasites enter the bloodstream and eventually infect liver hepatocytes. Parasites replicate and differentiate into merozoites over several days (~two in mice and ~seven in humans) to transition to potentially lethal blood-stage infection (5, 6). Liver-stage can be cleared by memory CD8 T cell-mediated immunity (5).
The “gold standard” for induction of liver-stage immunity in mouse models or humans is vaccination with radiation attenuated sporozoites (RAS) (7, 8). Intravenously (iv) injected attenuated sporozoites undergo an abortive liver infection that primes clonally diverse liver-stage-specific cytotoxic memory CD8 T cells (5, 9). These memory CD8 T cells, when present in sufficient numbers, can clear infected hepatocytes and prevent progression to blood-stage infection, termed “sterilizing immunity” (5, 10, 11). RAS vaccination is complicated, however, by logistical hurdles including the need for sporozoite harvest from infected mosquitos by hand, a cold chain, and iv delivery of three or more large doses of parasites (8, 12–14).
RAS immunization is well studied in mice, but often with doses that vastly exceed those used in human vaccine trials (~1–5×104 RAS/mouse versus 1–10×105 RAS in humans with a liver of 103-fold greater size) (15–17). Our studies used a weight-normalized RAS dose of 500 RAS/mouse that is analogous to doses used in humans.
We used a murine immunization model to explore strategies for limiting the logistical burdens of RAS vaccination by boosting with subunit vaccines. Subunit vaccines generate CD8 T cell populations specific for one or more epitopes (18), and, unlike RAS, can be produced, transported, and administered rapidly (19, 20) by either iv or the more efficient intramuscular (im) route. We find that liver-stage malaria-specific memory CD8 T cells primed by weight-adjusted RAS vaccination can be numerically amplified with iv- or im-delivered subunit vaccines to achieve sterilizing liver-stage immunity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mice, Immunizations, and Infections
6–10-week-old female CB6F1 (F1 cross of C57Bl/6 (H-2b) and BALB/c (H-2d)) mice (NCI) were injected iv (tail vein) with 104 Plasmodium berghei ANKA (Pb) RAS for initial vaccination. For booster vaccination, mice received iv 107 ActA−/−InlB−/− Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) expressing the indicated Pb peptide, 106 pfu of MVA-PbCSP (21) or MVA-PR8-NP (21) iv or im (hamstring muscle) at 28 days after RAS vaccination. Mice were injected with iv 103 freshly isolated Pb sporozoites for evaluation of sterilizing immunity and liver parasite burden.
Sporozoites
Pb sporozoites were purified from female mosquito salivary glands (21). RAS were created by irradiating virulent sporozoites with 200Gy using the University of Iowa Free Radical and Radiation Biology Program core facility. Infected mosquitos harboring luciferase expressing Pb sporozoites were sourced from the SporoCore, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Tetramers
Tetramers were conjugated from the following MHC class I monomers: Kd-CS252–260(SYIPSAEKI), Db-GAP5041–48(SQLLNAKYL), Db-TRAP130–138(SALLNVDNL), Kb-RPL6120–127(NVFDFNNL), and Db-NP366(ASNENMETM) (11, 22). 1:100 Fc block was used to prevent non-specific tetramer binding.
Cell isolation, purification, and flow cytometry
Livers were chopped and digested in digest medium (ThermoFisher, 17703034) for 30 minutes at 37°C, shaking at 100 RPM. Tissue was mashed through 70μM cell strainers. Cell suspensions were spun at 5 min 1500 RPM in a 35% Percoll (Cytiva #17089101)/65% HBSS (Gibco #24020–117) gradient. Blood was collected retro-orbitally. Erythrocytes were lysed with 1x Vitalyse (Cmdg, #WBL0100). Cell viability was assayed using the Fix Viability Dye 780.
Liver-stage immunity
Mouse liver parasite burden was assayed by bioluminescence using the Xenogen IVIS 200 instrument. Mouse abdominal fur was shaved prior to imaging. VivoGlo™ Luciferin (Ref #P1043) was injected intraperitoneally 10 minutes before imaging. Fluorescent image capture occurred for 2 minutes with 1.5 cm assumed for subject height.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Weight-normalized dose RAS-prime followed by Lm-CS252-boost vaccination induces protective immunity to liver-stage malaria in mice
CB6F1 mice, which respond to H-2d (BALB/c) and H-2b (C57Bl/6)-restricted CD8 T cell epitopes (22), were vaccinated with iv Pb RAS to generate clonally diverse liver-stage-protective liver Trm cells and potentially protective circulating memory CD8 T cells (17, 23). Vaccinations contained either 104 RAS, a typical mouse dose (17, 22), or a weight-normalized dose of 500 RAS (derived from a human RAS dose of ~5×105) (15, 16) (Supplemental Fig. 1A). Mice were challenged with virulent Pb sporozoites four weeks later. All mice vaccinated with 104 RAS – equivalent to 107 RAS in a human – exhibited sterilizing immunity, while one of eight mice receiving 500 RAS had sterilizing immunity (Supplemental Fig. 1B). Since humans do not develop sterilizing immunity after one RAS vaccination (15, 16), this result supported using 500 RAS vaccination followed by subunit vaccination of mice to study amplification of protective memory CD8 T cell responses and liver-stage immunity.
We determined if a “proof-of-concept” subunit vaccine could boost RAS-induced memory CD8 T cell responses. Recombinant Lm vaccination was used because it stimulates robust expansion of antigen-specific memory CD8 T cells (23). One month after 500 RAS vaccination, mice received iv attenuated Lm expressing secreted CS252, a liver-stage protective CD8 T cell H-2Kd-restricted epitope, or GAP5041, a non-protective H-2Db restricted epitope control (22). Frequencies of circulating CS252-specific memory CD8 T cells in RAS-prime, Lm-CS252-boost (RAS+Lm-CS252)-vaccinated mice exceeded those of RAS+Lm-GAP5041-vaccinated mice 28 days post-Lm (Fig. 1A, Supplemental Fig. 1C). Mouse livers contained CS252-specific memory CD8 T cells of both liver-stage protective resident memory (Trm, CD69+CD62L−) and circulating effector memory (Tem, CD69−CD62L−) phenotypes, and both populations were numerically enriched in RAS+ Lm-CS252-vaccinated mice versus RAS+Lm-GAP5041-vaccinated controls (Fig. 1B & Supplemental Fig. 1D).
Fig. 1: Weight-normalized dose RAS-prime followed by Lm-CS252-boost vaccination induces protective immunity to liver-stage malaria in mice.

CB6F1 mice received iv 500 Pb RAS followed by iv Lm-CS252 or Lm-GAP5041 28 days later and were challenged with iv 103 virulent Pb sporozoites 28 days after Lm vaccination. Blood was collected from all mice 2 days before challenge, while livers were collected from unchallenged mice for T cell analysis.
A) Frequencies of CS252-specific CD8 T cells in the blood of RAS+Lm-vaccinated mice 26 days after Lm vaccination. n=21 (RAS+Lm-GAP5041), n=23 RAS+Lm-CS252)
B) Numbers of CS252-specific Tem (CD69−CD62L−) and Trm (CD69+CD62L−) cells in livers of RAS+Lm vaccinated mice 26 days post-Lm vaccination. n=5 (RAS+Lm-GAP5041), n=5 RAS+Lm-CS252)
C) Liver parasite burden quantification (luciferin radiance) 44 hpi with 103 Pb sporozoites. n=10 (infected control, n=16 (RAS+Lm-GAP5041), n=18 RAS+Lm-CS252), n=3 (uninfected control)
D) Depiction of whether mice exhibited sterilizing immunity (blood-stage-) or developed parasitemia (blood-stage+). Numbers indicate #blood-stage+ mice/#total mice per group. n=10 (infected control, n=16 (RAS+Lm-GAP5041), n=18 RAS+Lm-CS252), n=3 (uninfected control).
Data are combined from two independent experiments, each with at least 3 mice per group. Each circle represents an individual mouse and mean ± SEM are depicted. (A) & (B) Unpaired 2-tailed t-test (C) 1 way ANOVA (Turkey’s post-hoc correction) comparing the mean of each column to the mean of every other column. (D) Chi squared test with 95% confidence interval between individual groups. *p≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001, ns p > 0.05.
Immunized and naïve mice were then challenged with iv 103 luciferase-expressing virulent Pb sporozoites. Liver parasite burden was quantified using IVIS imaging near the end of liver-stage infection (44 hpi) to determine the ability of the memory CD8 T cell response to clear infection. RAS+Lm-GAP5041-vaccinated mice reduced parasite burden (~0.5 Log10 radiance on average) as compared to non-vaccinated controls (Fig. 1D & Supplemental Fig. 1E), however, no RAS+Lm-GAP5041 mouse exhibited sterilizing immunity (Fig. 1E). RAS+Lm-CS252-vaccinated mice, in contrast, exhibited greater reduction in liver parasite burden (~1.5 Log10 radiance on average), and ten out of eighteen exhibited sterilizing immunity (Fig. 1C, 1D & Supplemental Fig. 1E). Of note, humans also develop partial non-sterilizing immunity after a single RAS vaccination (15, 16). These results suggest that subunit vaccination can augment partial liver-stage malaria protection engendered by one weight-normalized RAS vaccination via inducing numerical expansion of antigen-specific memory CD8 T cells.
Subunit vaccination with distinct liver-stage-protective epitopes induces protective immunity in RAS-vaccinated mice
To generalize these results beyond the CS252 epitope, groups of 500 RAS-vaccinated mice received booster vaccinations of Lm expressing different liver-stage protective epitopes, including H-2Db-restricted TRAP and H-2Kb-restricted RPL6 (11, 22). RAS-vaccinated mice that received Lm-CS252 or Lm-TRAP or Lm-RPL6 booster vaccination exhibited antigen-specific memory CD8 T cells in the blood (Fig. 2A) and (Fig. 2B), liver as well as reduced liver parasite burden and sterilizing immunity ranging from 53–90% of mice after sporozoite challenge (Fig. 2C). These results suggested that distinct protective epitopes can be incorporated into subunit booster vaccines, which would give flexibility in designing human vaccines and permit antigen combination in booster vaccinations.
Fig. 2: Lm-boost vaccination utilizing distinct liver-stage-protective epitopes of RAS-primed mice induces protective immunity.

CB6F1 mice received iv 500 Pb RAS followed by iv Lm-CS252, Lm-TRAP, Lm-RPL-6, or Lm-GAP5041 28 days later and were challenged with iv 103 virulent Pb sporozoites 28 days after Lm vaccination. Blood was collected from all mice 2 days before challenge for T cell analysis.
A) Frequencies of antigen-specific CD8 T cells in the blood of RAS+Lm-vaccinated mice 26 days after the Lm vaccination. Each group depicts the frequency of CD8 T cells that were specific for the antigen expressed by the respective Lm vaccination. n=10 (RAS+Lm-GAP5041), n=18 RAS+LmTRAP, n=15 RAS+ Lm-RPL6, n=10 RAS+Lm-CS252)
B) Liver parasite burden quantification (luciferin radiance) 44 hpi with 103 Pb sporozoites. n=9 (infected control), n=10 (RAS+Lm-GAP5041), n=18 RAS+Lm-TRAP, n=15 RAS+ Lm-RPL6, n=10 RAS+Lm-CS252), n=6 (uninfected control).
C) Depiction of whether mice exhibited sterilizing immunity (blood-stage-) or developed parasitemia (blood-stage+). Numbers indicate #blood-stage+ mice/#total mice per group. n=9 (infected control), n=10 (RAS+Lm-GAP5041), n=18 RAS+Lm-TRAP, n=15 RAS+ Lm-RPL6, n=10 RAS+Lm-CS252).
Data are combined from 2 independent experiments, each with a minimum of 4 mice per group. Each circle represents an individual mouse and mean ± SEM are depicted. (C) 1 way ANOVA (Turkey’s post-hoc correction) comparing the mean of each column to the mean of every other column. (D) Chi squared test with 95% confidence interval between individual groups. *p≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001, ns p > 0.05.
Intravenous MVA-CS252 booster vaccination induces liver-stage protection in RAS-vaccinated mice
Although attenuated Lm has been evaluated as a vaccine delivery platform in clinical trials (24), it has not found wide usage in the clinic. Attenuated viral vectors, such as modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) have in contrast been widely used to deliver malaria antigens in mice (19, 20) and to humans in prime-boost clinical trials (25, 26).
To address the utility of MVA-vectored boosting, RAS-vaccinated mice were injected with iv MVA-CS252 or MVA-NP366, the latter an irrelevant CD8 T cell influenza virus epitope. RAS+MVA-CS252-vaccinated mice exhibited higher levels of circulating and liver-localized Tem and Trm CS252-specific memory CD8 T cells than RAS+MVA-NP366-vaccinated counterparts (Fig. 3A & 3B). RAS+MVA-CS252-vaccinated mice demonstrated significantly reduced liver parasite burden (~1 Log10 radiance on average) as compared to RAS+MVA-NP366-vaccinated controls, and 83% of RAS+MVA-CS252-vaccinated mice exhibited sterilizing immunity (Fig. 3C & 3D). Of note, single vaccination with either Lm-CS252 or MVA-CS252 did not discernibly reduce parasite burden or induce sterilizing immunity in mice despite inducing circulating CS252-specific memory CD8 T cells (Supplemental Fig. 2A-D). These data suggested that human MVA vaccines could be used to enhance immunity engendered by one RAS vaccination.
Fig. 3: IV MVA-CS252 vaccination induces liver-stage protection in RAS-vaccinated mice.

CB6F1 mice received iv 500 Pb RAS followed by iv MVA-CS252 or MVA-NP366 28 days later and were challenged with iv 103 virulent Pb sporozoites 28 days after MVA vaccination. Blood was collected from all mice 2 days before challenge, while livers were collected from unchallenged mice for T cell analysis.
A) Frequencies of CS252-specific CD8 T cells in the blood of RAS+MVA-vaccinated mice 26 days after the MVA vaccination. n=19 (RAS+MVA-CS252), n=19 (RAS+ MVA-NP)
B) Numbers of CS252-specific Tem (CD69−CD62L−) and Trm (CD69+CD62L−) cells recovered from the livers of RAS+Lm vaccinated mice 26 days post-Lm vaccination. n=7 (RAS+MVA-CS252), n=7 (RAS+ MVA-NP)
C) Liver parasite burden quantification (luciferin radiance) 44 hpi with 103 Pb sporozoites. n=8 (infected control), n=12 (RAS+MVA-CS252), n=12 (RAS+ MVA-NP), n=8 (uninfected control).
D) Depiction of whether mice exhibited sterilizing immunity (blood-stage-) or developed parasitemia (blood-stage+). Numbers indicate #blood-stage+ mice/#total mice per group. n=8 (infected control), n=12 (RAS+MVA-CS252), n=12 (RAS+ MVA-NP).
Data are combined from 2 independent experiments, each with at least 4 mice per group. Each circle represents an individual mouse and mean ± SEM are depicted. (A) & (B) Unpaired 2-tailed t-test. (C) 1 way ANOVA (Turkey’s post-hoc correction) comparing the mean of each column to the mean of every other column. (D) Chi squared test with 95% confidence interval between individual groups. *p≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001, ns p > 0.05.
Intramuscular subunit vaccine delivery induces liver-stage protection in RAS-vaccinated mice
Intramuscular delivery – widely used in human vaccines (27) – is preferred over the iv route due to simplicity and logistics. Im RAS delivery, however, is ineffective at inducing protective immune responses in humans as compared to iv (12). Because RAS vaccination induced CS252-specific Tem and Trm in previous experiments, iv RAS-vaccinated mice were injected with im MVA-CS252 to determine if one of two iv vaccinations could be replaced while still generating protective memory CD8 T cell-mediated immunity.
RAS-vaccinated mice were given im MVA-CS252 (RAS+ im MVA-CS252) or MVA-NP366. RAS+ im MVA-CS252-vaccinated mice exhibited higher levels of circulating CS252-specific memory CD8 T cells than RAS+ im MVA-NP366-vaccinated counterparts (Fig. 4A). RAS+ im MVA-CS252 booster vaccination reduced liver parasite burden as compared to RAS+ im MVA-NP366 controls (~1 Log10 radiance on average), and 77% of RAS+ im MVA-CS252-vaccinated mice exhibited sterilizing immunity (Fig 4B. & 4C). These data suggest that im subunit vaccine delivery with a translationally relevant vector expands memory CD8 T cells induced by RAS prime vaccination, and that these responses confer increased protection as compared to RAS vaccination alone.
Fig. 4: im MVA-CS252 vaccination induces liver-stage protection in RAS-vaccinated mice.

CB6F1 mice received iv 500 Pb RAS followed by im MVA-CS252 or MVA-NP366 28 days later. Mice were challenged with iv 103 virulent Pb sporozoites 28 days after MVA vaccination. Blood was collected from all mice before challenge for T cell analysis.
A) Frequencies of CS252-specific CD8 T cells in the blood of RAS+MVA-vaccinated mice 26 days after the MVA vaccination. n=13 (RAS+MVA-CS252), n=12 (RAS+ MVA-NP)
B) Liver parasite burden quantification (luciferin radiance) 44 hpi with 103 Pb sporozoites. n=9 (infected control), n=13 (RAS+MVA-CS252), n=12 (RAS+ MVA-NP), n=6 (uninfected control).
C) Depiction of whether mice exhibited sterilizing immunity (blood-stage-) or developed parasitemia (blood-stage+). Numbers indicate #blood-stage+ mice/#total mice per group. n=9 (infected control), n=13 (RAS+MVA-CS252), n=12 (RAS+ MVA-NP),.
Data are combined from 2 independent experiments, each with at least 2 mice per group. Each circle represents an individual mouse and mean ± SEM are depicted. (A) Unpaired 2-tailed t-test (B) 1 way ANOVA (Turkey’s post-hoc correction) comparing the mean of each column to the mean of every other column. (C) Chi squared test with 95% confidence interval between individual groups. *p≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001, ns p > 0.05.
Our findings demonstrate that a weight-normalized dose RAS vaccination – which elicits a full range of malaria-specific Trm and circulating CD8 T cell memory cells – albeit at low non-protective numbers, primed hosts for a substantial secondary response of both CD8 populations following subunit boosting and conferred enhanced pathogen control. Limiting RAS usage to one vaccination would help overcome the logistical challenges of sporozoite immunization while still taking advantage of RAS-generated liver Trm and providing the opportunity to boost clonally distinct CD8 T cell responses. RAS-subunit prime-boost vaccination could therefore be a strategy to reduce the number of sporozoite-based vaccines necessary to induce sterilizing immunity to liver-stage malaria in humans.
Supplementary Material
KEY POINTS.
Weight-normalized RAS vaccination dosing in mice models human immunity
RAS prime-subunit boost vaccination induces immunity to liver-stage malaria in mice
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Harty lab members for helpful discussion, Ivan Badovinac, Barbara Badovinac, Carter Seely, Tavia Dreismeier, Megan Lindeman for maintaining the insectary, and Sheridan E. Young and Noah S. Butler for providing comments on the manuscript. Pb sporozoites expressing luciferase were sourced in part from the SporoCore at the University of Georgia, Athens, GA. Data herein were obtained from the Small Animal Imaging Core and Radiation and Free Radical Research (RFRR) Core, which are Carver College of Medicine Core Research Facilities/Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center Core Laboratories at the University of Iowa.
This work was supported by NIH grants AI085515 and AI100527 (JTH), T32 AI007485 (MNL), T32 007511 (LLD), P30 CA086862 (Free Radical Research (RFRR) Core)
Abbreviations
- RAS
radiation attenuated sporozoites
- Pb
Plasmodium berghei ANKA
- Lm
Listeria monocytogenes
- MVA
Modified vaccinia virus Ankara
- Trm
Tissue resident memory CD8 T cells
- iv
intravenous
- im
intramuscular
REFERENCES
- 1.WHO. 2020. World malaria report 2020: 20 years of global progress and challenges. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kokwaro G 2009. Ongoing challenges in the management of malaria. Malar J 8 Suppl 1: S2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nyunt MH, Aye KM, Kyaw MP, Kyaw TT, Hlaing T, Oo K, Zaw NN, Aye TT, and San NA. 2014. Challenges in universal coverage and utilization of insecticide-treated bed nets in migrant plantation workers in Myanmar. Malar J 13: 211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Crompton PD, Moebius J, Portugal S, Waisberg M, Hart G, Garver LS, Miller LH, Barillas-Mury C, and Pierce SK. 2014. Malaria immunity in man and mosquito: insights into unsolved mysteries of a deadly infectious disease. Annu Rev Immunol 32: 157–187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kurup SP, Butler NS, and Harty JT. 2019. T cell-mediated immunity to malaria. Nat Rev Immunol 19: 457–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cowman AF, Healer J, Marapana D, and Marsh K. 2016. Malaria: Biology and Disease. Cell 167: 610–624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nussenzweig RS, Vanderberg J, Most H, and Orton C. 1967. Protective immunity produced by the injection of x-irradiated sporozoites of plasmodium berghei. Nature 216: 160–162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Doll KL, and Harty JT. 2014. Correlates of protective immunity following whole sporozoite vaccination against malaria. Immunol Res 59: 166–176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Overstreet MG, Cockburn IA, Chen YC, and Zavala F. 2008. Protective CD8 T cells against Plasmodium liver stages: immunobiology of an ‘unnatural’ immune response. Immunol Rev 225: 272–283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lefebvre MN, and Harty JT. 2020. You Shall Not Pass: Memory CD8 T Cells in Liver-Stage Malaria. Trends Parasitol 36: 147–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Valencia-Hernandez AM, Ng WY, Ghazanfari N, Ghilas S, de Menezes MN, Holz LE, Huang C, English K, Naung M, Tan PS, Tullett KM, Steiner TM, Enders MH, Beattie L, Chua YC, Jones CM, Cozijnsen A, Mollard V, Cai Y, Bowen DG, Purcell AW, La Gruta NL, Villadangos JA, de Koning-Ward T, Barry AE, Barchet W, Cockburn IA, McFadden GI, Gras S, Lahoud MH, Bertolino P, Schittenhelm RB, Caminschi I, Heath WR, and Fernandez-Ruiz D. 2020. A Natural Peptide Antigen within the Plasmodium Ribosomal Protein RPL6 Confers Liver TRM Cell-Mediated Immunity against Malaria in Mice. Cell Host Microbe 27: 950–962 e957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sauerwein RW 2009. Clinical malaria vaccine development. Immunol Lett 122: 115–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Itsara LS, Zhou Y, Do J, Grieser AM, Vaughan AM, and Ghosh AK. 2018. The Development of Whole Sporozoite Vaccines for Plasmodium falciparum Malaria. Front Immunol 9: 2748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Richie TL, Billingsley PF, Sim BK, James ER, Chakravarty S, Epstein JE, Lyke KE, Mordmuller B, Alonso P, Duffy PE, Doumbo OK, Sauerwein RW, Tanner M, Abdulla S, Kremsner PG, Seder RA, and Hoffman SL. 2015. Progress with Plasmodium falciparum sporozoite (PfSPZ)-based malaria vaccines. Vaccine 33: 7452–7461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Seder RA, Chang LJ, Enama ME, Zephir KL, Sarwar UN, Gordon IJ, Holman LA, James ER, Billingsley PF, Gunasekera A, Richman A, Chakravarty S, Manoj A, Velmurugan S, Li M, Ruben AJ, Li T, Eappen AG, Stafford RE, Plummer SH, Hendel CS, Novik L, Costner PJ, Mendoza FH, Saunders JG, Nason MC, Richardson JH, Murphy J, Davidson SA, Richie TL, Sedegah M, Sutamihardja A, Fahle GA, Lyke KE, Laurens MB, Roederer M, Tewari K, Epstein JE, Sim BK, Ledgerwood JE, Graham BS, Hoffman SL, and V. R. C. S. Team. 2013. Protection against malaria by intravenous immunization with a nonreplicating sporozoite vaccine. Science 341: 1359–1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jongo SA, Shekalaghe SA, Church LWP, Ruben AJ, Schindler T, Zenklusen I, Rutishauser T, Rothen J, Tumbo A, Mkindi C, Mpina M, Mtoro AT, Ishizuka AS, Kassim KR, Milando FA, Qassim M, Juma OA, Mwakasungula S, Simon B, James ER, Abebe Y, Kc N, Chakravarty S, Saverino E, Bakari BM, Billingsley PF, Seder RA, Daubenberger C, Sim BKL, Richie TL, Tanner M, Abdulla S, and Hoffman SL. 2018. Safety, Immunogenicity, and Protective Efficacy against Controlled Human Malaria Infection of Plasmodium falciparum Sporozoite Vaccine in Tanzanian Adults. Am J Trop Med Hyg 99: 338–349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fernandez-Ruiz D, Ng WY, Holz LE, Ma JZ, Zaid A, Wong YC, Lau LS, Mollard V, Cozijnsen A, Collins N, Li J, Davey GM, Kato Y, Devi S, Skandari R, Pauley M, Manton JH, Godfrey DI, Braun A, Tay SS, Tan PS, Bowen DG, Koch-Nolte F, Rissiek B, Carbone FR, Crabb BS, Lahoud M, Cockburn IA, Mueller SN, Bertolino P, McFadden GI, Caminschi I, and Heath WR. 2016. Liver-Resident Memory CD8+ T Cells Form a Front-Line Defense against Malaria Liver-Stage Infection. Immunity 45: 889–902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moyle PM, and Toth I. 2013. Modern subunit vaccines: development, components, and research opportunities. ChemMedChem 8: 360–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gola A, Silman D, Walters AA, Sridhar S, Uderhardt S, Salman AM, Halbroth BR, Bellamy D, Bowyer G, Powlson J, Baker M, Venkatraman N, Poulton I, Berrie E, Roberts R, Lawrie AM, Angus B, Khan SM, Janse CJ, Ewer KJ, Germain RN, Spencer AJ, and Hill AVS. 2018. Prime and target immunization protects against liver-stage malaria in mice. Sci Transl Med 10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Reyes-Sandoval A, Berthoud T, Alder N, Siani L, Gilbert SC, Nicosia A, Colloca S, Cortese R, and Hill AV. 2010. Prime-boost immunization with adenoviral and modified vaccinia virus Ankara vectors enhances the durability and polyfunctionality of protective malaria CD8+ T-cell responses. Infect Immun 78: 145–153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ozaki LS, Gwadz RW, and Godson GN. 1984. Simple centrifugation method for rapid separation of sporozoites from mosquitoes. J Parasitol 70: 831–833. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Doll KL, Pewe LL, Kurup SP, and Harty JT. 2016. Discriminating Protective from Nonprotective Plasmodium-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses. J Immunol 196: 4253–4262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schmidt NW, Podyminogin RL, Butler NS, Badovinac VP, Tucker BJ, Bahjat KS, Lauer P, Reyes-Sandoval A, Hutchings CL, Moore AC, Gilbert SC, Hill AV, Bartholomay LC, and Harty JT. 2008. Memory CD8 T cell responses exceeding a large but definable threshold provide long-term immunity to malaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 14017–14022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Flickinger JC Jr., Rodeck U, and Snook AE. 2018. Listeria monocytogenes as a Vector for Cancer Immunotherapy: Current Understanding and Progress. Vaccines (Basel) 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ewer KJ, O’Hara GA, Duncan CJ, Collins KA, Sheehy SH, Reyes-Sandoval A, Goodman AL, Edwards NJ, Elias SC, Halstead FD, Longley RJ, Rowland R, Poulton ID, Draper SJ, Blagborough AM, Berrie E, Moyle S, Williams N, Siani L, Folgori A, Colloca S, Sinden RE, Lawrie AM, Cortese R, Gilbert SC, Nicosia A, and Hill AV. 2013. Protective CD8+ T-cell immunity to human malaria induced by chimpanzee adenovirus-MVA immunisation. Nat Commun 4: 2836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ogwang C, Kimani D, Edwards NJ, Roberts R, Mwacharo J, Bowyer G, Bliss C, Hodgson SH, Njuguna P, Viebig NK, Nicosia A, Gitau E, Douglas S, Illingworth J, Marsh K, Lawrie A, Imoukhuede EB, Ewer K, Urban BC, Hill AVS, Bejon P, and group M. 2015. Prime-boost vaccination with chimpanzee adenovirus and modified vaccinia Ankara encoding TRAP provides partial protection against Plasmodium falciparum infection in Kenyan adults. Sci Transl Med 7: 286re285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pollard AJ, and Bijker EM. 2021. A guide to vaccinology: from basic principles to new developments. Nat Rev Immunol 21: 83–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
