Abstract
Ultrasound is a noninvasive technique that provides real-time imaging with excellent resolution, and several studies demonstrated the potential of ultrasound in acute ischemic stroke monitoring. However, only a few studies were performed using animal models, of which many showed ultrasound to be a safe and effective tool also in therapeutic applications. The full potential of ultrasound application in experimental stroke is yet to be explored to further determine the limitations of this technique and to ensure the accuracy of translational research. This review covers the current status of ultrasound applied to monitoring and treatment in experimental animal models of stroke and examines the safety, limitations, and future perspectives.
Keywords: animal model, hemorrhagic, ischemic, stroke, ultrasound
1. Introduction
Ultrasound has several well-known advantages, including its noninvasiveness, low cost, portability, safety, and rapid real-time imaging [1,2]. Point-of-care ultrasound therefore became an important modality for clinically evaluating critically ill and injured patients in emergency medicine [3,4,5]. Ultrasound could be an essential tool in many neurological diseases, particularly in stroke, in which “time is brain” and “imaging is brain” [6]. Ultrasound imaging not only enables the study of anatomical structures but also provides useful information on the organs’ function, blood vessel characteristics, and blood flow (Doppler imaging) [7]. Ultrasound can therefore help speed the decision-making process and improve and accelerate the diagnosis and treatment, resulting in reduced neurological sequelae.
Due to the enormous potential of ultrasound, we reviewed its application in experimental animal models of stroke (ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH]), in monitoring and therapeutics (Figure 1), and assessed its safety, limitations, and future perspectives.
Figure 1.
Potential of ultrasound in animal models of stroke. Ultrasound applied to brain after stroke can provide rapid and additional information for monitoring or as a specific and local treatment. Main effects of ultrasound in monitoring and as a therapeutic tool are summarized in the figure. CBF: cerebral blood flow. Up arrows mean increase and down arrows mean decrease.
For this review, we conducted a search on the Google Scholar, PubMed, and grey literature databases, employing the search terms ultrasound, ultrasonography, Doppler, microbubbles, stroke, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, rat, animals, animal model, treatment, therapeutic, diagnostic, safety, limitations, brain, ultrasound frequency, low-frequency ultrasound, and high-frequency ultrasound. We restricted the search to animal studies, ultrasound, and stroke; however, no restriction was applied to the year of publication.
2. Ultrasound Applications in Ischemic Stroke
Ischemic stroke is the most common stroke type [8] and it occurs when a blood vessel is occluded by a thrombus or embolism, leading to loss of oxygen and glucose in cerebral tissue [9]. The resulting cerebral ischemia causes neuronal damage in the core zone shortly after onset. Surrounding the core zone is an area known as the penumbra [10], where the cells are not yet irreversibly damaged and can be recovered if cerebral blood flow (CBF) is restored [9]. Ultrasound can therefore play an important role in monitoring ischemic stroke.
2.1. Ultrasound Monitoring in Ischemic Stroke
In a 1999 study conducted on focal cerebral ischemia in rabbits, Els T et al. demonstrated the usefulness of ultrasound for the continuous monitoring of CBF velocity to follow rapid changes in the dynamics of the ischemic process [11], thereby offering a tool for stroke control from early monitoring to therapy. These changes in CBF were studied using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) [12], Doppler velocimetry [13], and functional ultrasound [14]. Ultrasound contrast agents are encapsulated microbubbles in suspension with great echogenicity that can enhance the echo signals [15,16]). These microbubbles accumulate in the microvasculature providing anatomical reference information or molecular characteristics at target sites [15,16]. Microbubbles can be filled with air or gas. The most common gases are sulfur hexafluoride, decafluorobutane, perfluorobutane, perflutren, and octafluoropropane [15,16]. Microbubbles also need a cover to reduce gas diffusion into the blood. This cover can be made from polymers, lipids, or denatured albumin [15]. Along with the microbubble cover, other compounds like PEG (polyethylene glycol) can be used to enhance stability and reduce immune system recognition. Despite microbubble are the most frequently used, other options, such as perfluorocarbon nanoparticles or echogenic liposomes, are being studied to improve ultrasound imaging [15]. Premilovac D et al. applied transcranial CEUS to rats with middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) to measure cerebral perfusion after stroke in real-time. In this noninvasive manner, the authors observed a reduction in cerebral perfusion during ischemia and hyperperfusion during recanalization [12].
Doppler ultrasound made it possible to determine blood flow velocities in rats with ischemic stroke [17,18]. Specifically, ultrasound imaging of the circle of Willis made it possible to obtain information on cerebral collateral recruitment and thus the presence or absence of ischemic lesions, reflow, hemodynamic changes, and reperfusion, all of which can clarify the underlying recovery mechanism after stroke [17,18]. Functional ultrasound is a useful imaging technique for studying brain perfusion during and after MCAO in rats with acute and postacute stroke [14,19]. In a thromboembolic MCAO model of mice treated with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), the ultrafast ultrasound study of brain reperfusion in the ischemic lesion helped predict the prognostic outcomes and thrombolytic treatment response [20]. There is also an enhanced form of Doppler ultrasound known as the triplex ultrasonographic mode, which can be useful for studying blood flow in experimental animal models of stroke [13] (Table 1). This evidence indicates that ultrasound is a feasible, effective, and rapid method for evaluating/monitoring the dynamics of the ischemic process in experimental studies.
Table 1.
Main experimental animal models of stroke (ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage) using ultrasound with monitoring and therapeutic application.
| ISCHEMIC STROKE | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | Sex/Species/n | Stroke type | Ultrasound | Frequency | Duration | Application | Findings |
| Els T. [11] | M/New Zealand rabbits/9 | MCAO | Transcranial Doppler | 4 MHz | Burst interval of 2 s | Monitoring: CBF velocity measurements | Decrease in CBF in the affected hemisphere |
| Premilova D. [12] | M/SD rats/16 | MCAO | Transcranial CEU | 15.2 Hz | 3 times, 60 s |
Monitoring: CBF velocity measurements | Hyperemia poststroke |
| Brunner C. [14] | M/SD rats18 | MCAO | fUS | 15 MHz | 3 min | Monitoring: CBF velocity measurements | Mapping changes of CBF in stroke |
| Li L. [17] | M/SD rats/12 | MCAO | Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography | 6.3 MHz | -- | Monitoring: CBF velocity measurements | Redistribution of CBF after stroke |
| Bonnin P. [18] | M&F/Wistar rats/92 | MCAO | Colour Doppler | 12 MHz | 15 min | Monitoring: CBF velocity measurements | Collateral CBF protective role |
| Brunner C. [19] | M/SD rats/12 | MCAO | fUS | 1.43 MHz | 30 min (baseline), 90 min (occlusion period) and 90 min (after clip removal) |
Monitoring: CBF velocity measurements | Contralesional CBF response after stroke |
| Hingot V. [20] | M/Swiss mice/19 | MCAO | Ultrafast | 500 Hz | -- | Monitoring: CBF measurements |
Hypoperfusion in ischemic lesion after stroke |
| Guo T. [21] | M/SD rats/38 | MCAO | pTUS | 0.5 MHz | 60 min | Therapeutic: protective role of ultrasound | Promotion of CBF, decrease of ischemic lesion |
| Alexandrov AV. [22] | --/Long-Evans rats/32 | MCAO | Pulsed-wave transcranial | 2 MHz | 90 min | Therapeutic: effect on infarct volume | Reduction of ischemic brain damage and oedema Promotion of microcirculation |
| Chen CM. [23] | M/C57BL/6 mice/18 | MCAO | Low-intensity pulsed | 1 MHz | 15 min daily | Therapeutic: protective effect | Reduction of brain damage VEGF levels recovered Increase BDNF protein expression |
| WU CT. [24] | M/C57BL/6 mice/40 | MCAO | Low-intensity pulsed | 1 MHz | 15 min daily | Therapeutic: prevention of recurrent stroke | Reduction of lethality rate Prevent histopathological changes in brain |
| Cho SE. [25] | M/C57BL/6N mice/30 | Photothrombosis | -- | 0.04 MHz | 20 min/day | Therapeutic: evaluation of ultrasound effect in vitro and in vivo | Promotion of neuronal differentiation and neurogenesis |
| Daffertshofer M. [26] | --/Wistar & SD rats/47 | Embolic stroke | Low-intensity | 22.570 Hz | 1 h | Therapeutic: ultrasound with tPA | Reduction of infarct volume |
| Brown AT. [27] | --/New Zealand rabbits/-- | Emboli | -- | 1 MHz | 60 min | Therapeutic: ultrasound and MB with tPA | Significant clot lysis. Reduction of infarct volume and ICH |
| Gao S. [28] | --/Pigs/-- | Bilateral ICAO | Transcranial | 1.6 MHz | 5 and 20 µs | Therapeutic: ultrasound w/o MB | Improvement in CBF |
| Culp WC. [29] | --/New Zealand Rabbits/74 | Internal carotid embolization | Pulsed-wave | 1 MHz | 1 h | Therapeutic: ultrasound and MB or tPA | Reduction of infarct volume |
| Fatar M. [30] | M/Wistar rats/16 | MCAO | TCCD | 2 MHz | 30 min | Therapeutic: ultrasound and MB | Reduction of infarct volume |
| Schleicher N. [31] | M/Wistar rats/36 | MCAO | Transcranial | 3 MHz | 60 min | Therapeutic: ultrasound and MB with tPA | Improvement of microvascular patency |
| Culp WC. [32] | --/Pigs/15 | Autogenous thrombus | LFUS | 1 MHz | 24 min | Therapeutic: ultrasound and MB with glycoprotein | Augmented thrombolysis |
| Rodríguez-Frutos B. [33] | M/SD rats/143 | Subcortical stroke | UTMD | 7 MHz | 5 min | Therapeutic: ultrasound and MB with trophic factor | Functional recovery. Fiber connectivity restoration Increased brain marker expression |
| Zhao R. [34] | M/SD rats/30 | Intraluminal MCA blockage | UTMD | 1.03 MHz | 60 s | Therapeutic: ultrasound and MB with phosphatidylserine | Reduction in time of BBB opening Produced an early activated microglia/macrophage |
| Wang HB. [35] | F/CD1 mice/-- | Transient MCAO | UTMD | 1.6 MHz | 5 min | Therapeutic: ultrasound and MB with VEGF gene | Infarct areas and apoptosis reduction Increased vessel density |
| HEMORRHAGIC STROKE | |||||||
| Reference | Species | Stroke type | Ultrasound type | Frequency | Duration | Application | Findings |
| Mu HM. [36] | M/SD rats/280 | ICH | Therapeutic | 1 MHz | 15 min, once daily | Therapeutic: effects on brain angiogenesis | Increase expression of integrins and collagen Microvessels formation promotion Functional recovery |
| Ke Z. [37] | M/SD rats/18 | ICH | Transcranial Doppler | 4–13 MHz | -- | Monitoring: CBF velocity measurements | Flow velocity changes after stroke |
| Stroick M. [38] | M/Wistar rats/14 | ICH | Transcranial | 2 MHz | 30 min | Therapeutic: ultrasound and MB safety | Ultrasound + MB due not increase additional damage |
| Zhou X. [39] | M/Dogs/12 | ICH | Contrast-enhanced ultrasound | 7 MHz | Every 30 min until hematoma formed | Monitoring: hematoma visualization | Brain hemorrhage imaging |
Abbreviations: BBB, blood brain barrier; CBF, cerebral blood flow; CEU, contrast-enhanced ultrasound; F, female; fUS, functional ultrasound; ICAO, internal carotid artery occlusion; ICH, intracerebral haemorrhage; LFUS, low-frequency ultrasound; M, male; MB, microbubbles; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MCAO, middle cerebral artery occlusion; MHz, megahertz; pTUS, pulsed transcranial ultrasound; SD, Sprague-Dawley; TCCD, transcranial color-coded duplex sonography; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator; UTMD, ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction; --, not indicated.
2.2. Therapeutic Ultrasound in Ischemic Stroke
In a 1974 study by Sobbe et al., ultrasound was employed to recanalize thrombosed femoral arteries in dogs, obtaining good results with no complications [40]. The application of low- or high-intensity pulsed ultrasound in an MCAO rat model opens possibilities for developing new therapies [21,22]. Specifically, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (0.5 MHz) might have protective effects and promote CBF [21], while 1 MHz can trigger the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), reduce brain damage [23], and reduce neuronal apoptosis [24]. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (2 MHz) can reduce brain oedema and ischemic damage [24], thus facilitating the recovery of ischemic areas. In a mouse stroke model after the administration of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, ultrasound was shown to promote neuronal differentiation, improving functional recovery, and reducing infarct volume [25].
Ultrasound is known to enhance thrombolytic drug activity [41,42] and to improve clot lysis. High-intensity focused ultrasound (1.5 MHz) initiates thrombolysis safely and effectively in rabbits subjected to an embolic stroke [43]. Low-intensity ultrasound (25.570 Hz) was employed in parallel to tPA infusion in a rat model of embolic ischemic stroke. The combination was more effective than tPA treatment alone in reducing infarct volume [26]. The administration of microbubbles, with or without tPA, can further enhance ultrasound thrombolysis [27,44,45]. Gao S et al. reported that intravenous microbubble administration (without tPA) and the use of ultrasound improved CBF by recanalizing the ipsilateral carotid artery of pigs [28]. This strategy also reduced infarct volume in rabbits with internal carotid embolization [29] and reduced glutamate concentration, suggesting a protective role for ultrasound and microbubbles in rats with acute ischemic stroke [30]. The combination of tPA and microbubble+ultrasound in a rabbit arterial embolic stroke model led to a reduction in infarct volume and hemorrhage formation [27] and improved microvascular patency in rats after MCAO [31]. Culp WC et al. demonstrated that the intravenous administration of microbubbles loaded with a glycoprotein 2b/3a receptor antagonist successfully augmented the effect of transcutaneous low-frequency ultrasound (1 MHz) in dissolving acute intracranial thrombi without thrombolytic drugs in a swine stroke model [32].
Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction (UTMD) is a technique that uses low-frequency moderate-power ultrasound in combination with microbubbles that encapsulate drugs to enhance drug delivery into tissues. Ultrasound can increase microvessel permeability and trigger cavitation, thus allowing transport of microbubbles and release of drugs into the desired area [46,47].
Moreover, one of the applications of ultrasound in the brain is the temporary opening of the blood brain barrier (BBB) [48]. The detailed mechanism behind ultrasound-mediated BBB disruption is still under investigation, but two major mechanisms were proposed as an explanation. Both stable and inertial cavitation together with microbubbles can help open the BBB. However, whereas stable cavitation disrupts the BBB via wobbled expansion and contraction of microbubbles, inertial cavitation is caused by the violent collapse of the microbubbles, which could lead to vascular damage [49]. The first study of ultrasound-induced BBB opening showed small lesions with severe parenchymal damage [50]. Recent research has indicated that low-frequency and focused ultrasound noninvasively opens the BBB and increase expression of caveolin, which plays an important role in the transport of large vesicles [51,52]. The duration of BBB disruption is also under investigation and might be related to the diameter of the delivered substances. Small particles of 1 nm can cross several hours after BBB disruption, with complete BBB restoration after 24 h; 4 nm particles stopped crossing the BBB after 2 h [53]. Regardless of the duration of the BBB opening, cavitation allows large molecules and genes to cross the plasma membranes of cultured cells after the application of acoustic energy [54,55]. These findings improve our understanding of how ultrasound influences the BBB and help the development of new drugs.
Drug-loaded microbubbles can be excited and broken by ultrasound thus releasing substances to desired targets and, increasing the local drug concentration. For example, microbubble encapsulation and ultrasound delivery of BDNF to the lesion site improves functional recovery, which is associated with tract connectivity restoration, remyelination, and brain recovery markers in a rat model of ischemic stroke [33]. The release of phosphatidylserine contained in microbubbles using ultrasound activated microglia during neuroinflammation after stroke in rats [34]. UTMD could be also used in gene therapy. For instance, it was applied in mice after transient MCAO for delivery of VEGF (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor) gene and demonstrated a reduction in ischemic injury [35] (Table 1).
3. Ultrasound Applications in Intracerebral Hemorrhage
ICH is produced by blood extravasation into the brain [39], with a significant increase in volume growth after the first few hours [36,56]. ICH lacks effective treatments, leading to high mortality and morbidity [36,39] and producing severe neurological outcomes. Therefore, the early detection of ICH and the development of effective therapeutic approaches assume great importance, with ultrasound-based technologies opening up a promising field of research and treatment.
3.1. Ultrasound Monitoring in Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Few studies employed it in an experimental animal model of ICH. Doppler can be used in ICH to study tissue perfusion in animal models [37]. To our knowledge, the study by Ke Z et al. [37] is the only one to use high-frequency Doppler ultrasound (4–13 MHz) to analyze blood flow velocity changes in certain arteries in rats before and after ICH. As the authors noted in the study, this tool could be employed in future studies combined with protective agents that affect cerebral hemodynamics after ICH [37] (Table 1).
Despite the use of ultrasound in ischemic stroke, ultrasound is underutilized in the monitoring of ICH, resulting from a lack of scientific evidence in this field. B-mode ultrasound could be used to monitor hematoma volume in experimental models of ICH.
3.2. Therapeutic Ultrasound in Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Only a few studies employed ultrasound as treatment for ICH. Repeated applications of ultrasound in rats following ICH were shown to promote brain angiogenesis by enhancing the expression of extracellular matrix molecules (such as collagen and integrins) and accelerating neurological recovery [36]. Stroick M et al. demonstrated that ultrasound combined with microbubbles did not increase the hematoma volume, brain oedema extent, or apoptosis rate in rat brains during ICH [38]. Moreover, in a study conducted in dogs with ICH, the tandem ultrasound-microbubbles was used visualizing successfully the hematoma through the bone window [39] (Table 1).
4. Safety of Ultrasound
Safety is the primary consideration when applying a technique in in vivo research. Brain barriers are crucial in neurological diseases. Preclinical studies in animals provide an overwhelming advantage when evaluating the safety of ultrasound exposure, given that there are various methods to evaluate the BBB integrity that cannot be performed on humans. The most commonly used technique to assess the opening of the BBB in preclinical studies was the administration of Evans Blue [57].
This chemical is intravenously administered during exposure with ultrasound and its extravasation to the brain parenchyma is studied using a fluorescence microscope postmortem [33]. More advanced techniques allow for the observation of BBB integrity in vivo. The use of a gadolinium-based contrast can be imaged by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), assessing BBB opening after ultrasound exposure and evaluating the extravasation of this agent into the brain parenchyma [58]. Lastly, hemorrhagic transformation is an important concern to consider because ultrasound exposure could disrupt the integrity of vessels in the brain. The presence of hemorrhage can be analyzed in animal models by using hematoxylin and eosin, Nissl staining in postmortem tissue and by MRI in vivo [59]. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence are techniques used to evaluate the safety of ultrasound exposure by analyzing the integrity of the blood vessels by using antibodies against ZO-1 (Zona Occludens-1) or lectin markers [33]. These techniques also allow us to analyze apoptosis, necrosis, abnormal cell migration and membrane dysfunction in the parenchyma using a fluorescence microscope postmortem.
Several parameters are important to safety, such as frequency, intensity, mechanical index, duty cycle or pulse repetition frequency, no consensus was reached. Since different settings are used for monitoring and treatment using ultrasound, the safety concerns will be treated separately.
4.1. Safety Data of Ultrasound in Monitoring Stroke
Several studies using ultrasound imaging in animal models have reported no tissue damage using a 6.3 MHz linear transducer [17], 12 MHz linear transducer [18] and 15 MHz linear array transducer [14] in MCAO models. Other studies applied imaging ultrasound in an embolic stroke model using a 12 MHz linear transducer and did not report secondary effects [60]. Moreover, imaging ultrasound was also applied in an animal model of ICH using 13–14 MHz transcranial Doppler ultrasonography and did not report secondary hemorrhages [37]. Other studies examined the brain’s blood flow and anatomical structures in healthy animals using a 13 MHz linear transcranial transducer [61] and 16 MHz transducer [62]. Considering these studies, the range of 12–16 MHz frequencies to be safe for imaging in the animal brain. However, other frequencies of ultrasound, such as 20 MHz, were shown to initiate cellular injury by inactivating several enzymes and causing free radical production in the brain [63], and ultrasound exposure of 3 MHz increased antioxidant enzyme activities in the rat brain [64]. Therefore, demonstrating safety at the 12–16 MHz frequency range does not directly lead to safety at lower frequencies. Further studies investigating the safety of ultrasound during imaging would help set limits on the machine output parameters and determine which frequency range is adequate and safe to use.
4.2. Safety Data of Therapeutic Ultrasound in Stroke
When ultrasound is used as a treatment, the waves need more energy compared with that of imaging applications. The absorption of energy within tissue leads to a rise in temperature. This phenomenon is known as the thermal effect [65]. The magnitude and duration of the temperature increase may cause tissue damage. Ultrasound waves also lead to mechanical effects that result in pressure changes, shear forces, and cellular damage with molecule release [65].
Lower frequencies demonstrated safety in experimental animal models of stroke: 0.5 MHz may have protective effects and promote CBF [21], 1 MHz can reduce brain damage [23] and neuronal apoptosis [24], and 2 MHz can reduce brain oedema and ischemic injury [22]. For ultrasound enhanced thrombolysis frequencies of 1.5 MHz [43] was shown to be safe.
Some studies analyzed how microbubble cavitation threshold can be reduced when combined with ultrasound [66]. Cavitation is indicated by the mechanical index [67], this is another important parameter to take into account for the safety of the technique. Although the optimal mechanical index to be used is yet to be determined [68], the British Medical Ultrasound Society established a mechanical index limit of 0.7 for microbubble cavitation [69]. Not only is the mechanical index important when evaluating the safety of ultrasound-induced microbubble cavitation as a treatment for stroke, but also the frequency is a relevant parameter. The first study that demonstrated the safety of combined ultrasound and microbubbles after acute cerebral ischemia in rats was performed by Fatar M et al. in 2008 and used 2 MHz of frequency [30]. Since then, ultrasound cavitation of microbubbles was also shown to not induce secondary hemorrhage in animal models of ischemia using frequencies between 1.6 and 7 MHz [53,55,70], and in models of hemorrhage using 2 MHz [38].
Another relevant safety aspect to consider is the intensity. Intensities 57 and 86 mW/cm2 [21], 128 mW/cm2 [22], and 528 mW/cm2 [23] used as a therapy to promote brain protection and reduce ischemic damage were found to be safe in an experimental animal model of stroke.
The use of continuous Doppler mode was shown to induce greater tissue damage than the pulsed application in animal models. Schneider F et al. showed that transcranial application of 20 kHz continuous ultrasound as a treatment in rats caused vasogenic and cytotoxic brain oedema and a loss of neuronal cells, resulting in a higher death cell rate [71]. To prevent brain damage, as mentioned before, pulsed mode emerged as an option to reduce the adverse effects in terms of mortality, lesion volume and recovery [72]. The pulse repetition frequency of each mode should also be taken into consideration. In one study, the ischemic core was exposed to an ultrasound signal for 360 trials of 0.4 s every 10 s, which did not produce any adverse effects [21]. Another study targeted ultrasound on the injured cortical areas in rats every 5 min for 15 min per day for a maximum of 5 days, which also did not produce any adverse effects [23]. Again, no adverse effects were found when rats received 1 ms ultrasound bursts every second for 20 s [43]. Another study directed ultrasound waves at the left hemisphere for 5 min, giving ultrasound bursts every 500 ms; no adverse effects were detected [35]. No tissue damage was detected when using ultrasound with a duty cycle of 20% for 1 h in parallel to recombinant tPA infusion [26].
5. Limitations and Future of Ultrasound
5.1. Limitations of Ultrasound
Despite all its advantages, ultrasound currently has certain limitations. The technique requires the knowledge and expertise of a well-trained operator [2], and therefore caution is necessary when acquiring and interpreting images. A standardization of ultrasound parameters is also needed, given that several studies have failed to report the intensity, duration and mechanical index employed, hindering the studies’ reproducibility [73]. Another limitation of ultrasound is its reduced penetration in the presence of bone structures [2,74]. In certain studies, this limitation was countered by thinning or removing the skull [14,75], which causes additional damage. The lack of scientific articles on the use of ultrasound in experimental models of stroke also highlights the need for further research in this area, especially in ICH.
5.2. Future of Ultrasound in Preclinical Models
5.2.1. New Approaches of Ultrasound
The information on brain anatomy provided by ultrasound may help research on neurological diseases. B-mode echography was proven as a feasible tool for noninvasively studying anatomical structures of the rat brain [61] and, Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI), an advanced and innovative ultrasound mode based on Doppler, allows study of microvascular blood flow with and without contrast agents, enabling the creation of an innovative vascular brain map [61].
Technological advances such as “ultrafast” ultrasound systems can process thousands of frames per second. The study conducted by Macé E et al. employed this technique to quantify blood perfusion differences in the rat brain [76]. Ultrasound localization microscopy (a super-resolution ultrasound imaging based on ultrafast ultrasound) increased sensitivity and image definition, enabling the study of cerebral blood volumes in mice after stroke [20]. This ultrasound modality could become an interesting tool for obtaining deep super-resolution vascular images and providing improved transcranial imaging.
Tan JK et al. demonstrated that gene transfer after prior administration in the intraventricular area could be increased by the use of ultrasound through a temporal opening of the choroid plexus epithelium [77]. The combined use of ultrasound-mediated BBB opening and microbubbles for drugs or gene delivery could be further developed for future clinical applications. Currently, several clinical trials are underway assessing the safety of BBB disruption in a variety of diseases [78]. Lastly, stem cell-based therapies offer a promising view of stroke treatment. In this field, a new therapeutic approach for ultrasound could be based on the biological effect of focus ultrasound in increasing the efficacy of stem cell homing in the brain parenchyma after their intravenous administration [79].
These advances could enhance the widespread use of ultrasound and its variants in future preclinical studies, as well as in the clinic. The versatility of ultrasound and its prospects provide the option of obtaining data in real-time and could lead to shorter delays to treatments for various neurological diseases.
5.2.2. Imaging 3D/4D in Ultrasound
Other novel techniques, such as 3D and 4D model ultrasound, could emerge as powerful modalities of choice in the diagnosis of various diseases [80]. Work performed on rodents [81,82], pigeons [83], and ferrets [84] were able to construct 3D maps of brain activity and to obtain 3D vascular imaging. Additionally, we also find ultrasound neuroimaging in 4D. In preclinical studies, 4D ultrasound microvascular imaging could become a valuable tool for studying brain hemodynamics, cerebral flow autoregulation and vascular remodeling after stroke [85]. Also, it was demonstrated that 4D functional ultrasound can be used to obtain 4D functional connectivity in rats [86]. These results suggest a possible new modality for neuroimaging of the brain that could expand the observation and study of the whole brain in animal models
6. From Preclinical Models to Clinical Practice
In humans, ultrasound is used extensively and the possibility of developing new advances for monitoring or therapeutic purposes in animals may help to expand its use in the clinic. Being able to use ultrasound in the laboratory will accentuate the similarity between the two scenarios, which is fundamental in translational research.
Ultrasound is widely used as a diagnostic tool in patients with ischemic stroke [7]. However, is not routinely employed in patients with ICH, despite its potential role in the measurement of ICH volume and growth [1,39,87,88].
In clinical practice, ultrasound was used ad and adjuvant to thrombolysis, the so-called sonothrombolysis. This approach improves arterial recanalization and functional outcomes. [89]. However, there is a shortfall in the translation of therapeutic studies with microbubbles. Currently, in vitro and in vivo studies are exploring the possibility to enhance transgene expression and targeted drug delivery without adverse effects [90]. For this reason, development in ultrasound application with microbubbles will allow new therapeutical approaches for stroke patients.
7. Conclusions
Ultrasound is a noninvasive, low-cost, rapid, and safe technique whose versatility makes it an imaging tool worth considering for stroke, given that stroke requires rapid and appropriate action. In preclinical studies of stroke (ischemic stroke and ICH), ultrasound proved to be useful in monitoring and as a therapeutic tool, and its safety profile was demonstrated in various experimental animal models. At present, however, only a few studies were performed on its use in stroke, particularly regarding ICH. The lack of scientific data on the application of ultrasound in the preclinical field of stroke necessitates continuing the study of this promising imaging technique to solve its present limitations and to safely transfer the results from bench to bedside.
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the support of Morote traducciones S.L. for their editing assistance.
Author Contributions
Writing—original draft preparation, M.C.G.-d.F. and F.L.-G.; writing—review & editing, I.G.-S., L.D., L.O.-O., M.A.d.L., B.F., D.P., G.R.-A., E.D.-T. and M.G.-F.; conceptualization, writing—review & editing, M.G.-F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the Carlos III Health Institute Health Care Research Fund grant number FIS PI16/01052 and cofunded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)–Miguel Servet (CP15/00069, CPII20/00002 to María Gutiérrez–Fernández; CP20/00024 to Laura Otero–Ortega) and predoctoral fellowship (FI17/00188 to Mari Carmen Gómez–de Frutos, FI18/00026 to Fernando Laso–García) and the INVICTUS PLUS Spanish Network (RD16/0019/0005) of the Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Meyer-Wiethe K., Sallustio F., Kern R. Diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage with transcranial ultrasound. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2009;27:40–47. doi: 10.1159/000203125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Greco A., Mancini M., Gargiulo S., Gramanzini M., Claudio P.P., Brunetti A., Salvatore M. Ultrasound biomicroscopy in small animal research: Applications in molecular and preclinical imaging. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012;2012:519238. doi: 10.1155/2012/519238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Neri L., Storti E., Lichtenstein D. Toward an ultrasound curriculum for critical care medicine. Crit. Care Med. 2007;35((Suppl. S5)):S290–S304. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000260680.16213.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bobbia X., Zieleskiewicz L., Pradeilles C., Hudson C., Muller L., Claret P.G., Group W.F. The clinical impact and prevalence of emergency point-of-care ultrasound: A prospective multicenter study. Anaesth. Crit. Care Pain Med. 2017;36:383–389. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Weile J., Frederiksen C.A., Laursen C.B., Graumann O., Sloth E., Kirkegaard H. Point-of-care ultrasound induced changes in management of unselected patients in the emergency department-a prospective single-blinded observational trial. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med. 2020;28:47. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00740-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Puig J., Shankar J., Liebeskind D., Terceño M., Nael K., Demchuk A.M., Menon B., Dowlatshashi D., Leiva-Salinas C., Demchuk A.M., et al. From “Time is Brain” to “Imaging is Brain”: A Paradigm Shift in the Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke. J. Neuroimaging. 2020;30:562–571. doi: 10.1111/jon.12693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu Y., Hua Y., Feng W., Ovbiagele B. Multimodality ultrasound imaging in stroke: Current concepts and future focus. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2016;14:1325–1333. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2016.1254043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ojaghihaghighi S., Vahdati S.S., Mikaeilpour A., Ramouz A. Comparison of neurological clinical manifestation in patients with hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. World J. Emerg. Med. 2017;8:34–38. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rink C., Khanna S. Significance of brain tissue oxygenation and the arachidonic acid cascade in stroke. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011;14:1889–1903. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Prabhakaran S., Ruff I., Bernstein R.A. Acute stroke intervention: A systematic review. JAMA. 2015;313:1451–1462. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Els T., Daffertshofer M., Schroeck H., Kuschinsky W., Hennerici M. Comparison of transcranial Doppler flow velocity and cerebral blood flow during focal ischemia in rabbits. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1999;25:933–938. doi: 10.1016/S0301-5629(99)00049-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Premilovac D., Blackwood S.J., Ramsay C.J., Keske M.A., Howells D.W., Sutherland B.A. Transcranial contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the rat brain reveals substantial hyperperfusion acutely post-stroke. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2020;40:939–953. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20905493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kreis D., Schulz D., Stein M., Preuss M., Nestler U. Assessment of parameters influencing the blood flow velocities in cerebral arteries of the rat using ultrasonographic examination. Neurol. Res. 2011;33:389–395. doi: 10.1179/1743132810Y.0000000010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brunner C., Isabel C., Martin A., Dussaux C., Savoye A., Emmrich J., Montaldo G., Mas J.L., Baron J.C., Urban A. Mapping the dynamics of brain perfusion using functional ultrasound in a rat model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017;37:263–276. doi: 10.1177/0271678X15622466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dayton P.A., Rychak J.J. Molecular ultrasound imaging using microbubble contrast agents. Front. Biosci. 2007;12:5124–5142. doi: 10.2741/2553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chong W.K., Papadopoulou V., Dayton P.A. Imaging with ultrasound contrast agents: Current status and future. Abdom. Radiol. 2018;43:762–772. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1516-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li L., Ke Z., Tong K.Y., Ying M. Evaluation of Cerebral Blood Flow Changes in Focal Cerebral Ischemia Rats by Using Transcranial Doppler Ultrasonography. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2010;36:595–603. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bonnin P., Leger P.L., Deroide N., Fau S., Baud O., Pocard M., Charriaut-Marlangue C., Renolleau S. Impact of intracranial blood-flow redistribution on stroke size during ischemia-reperfusion in 7-day-old rats. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2011;198:103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brunner C., Korostelev M., Raja S., Montaldo G., Urban A., Baron J.C. Evidence from functional ultrasound imaging of enhanced contralesional microvascular response to somatosensory stimulation in acute middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion in rats: A marker of ultra-early network reorganization? J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2018;38:1690–1700. doi: 10.1177/0271678X18786359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hingot V., Brodin C., Lebrun F., Heiles B., Chagnot A., Yetim M., Gauberti M., Orset C., Tanter M., Couture O., et al. Early Ultrafast Ultrasound Imaging of Cerebral Perfusion correlates with Ischemic Stroke outcomes and responses to treatment in Mice. Theranostics. 2020;10:7480–7491. doi: 10.7150/thno.44233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guo T., Li H., Lv Y., Lu H., Niu J., Sun J., Yang G.Y., Ren C., Tong S. Pulsed transcranial ultrasound stimulation immediately after the ischemic brain injury is neuroprotective. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engl. 2015;62:2352–2357. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2427339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Alexandrov A.V., Barlinn K., Strong R., Alexandrov A.W., Aronowski J. Low-Power 2-MHz Pulsed-Wave Transcranial Ultrasound Reduces Ischemic Brain Damage in Rats. Transl. Stroke Res. 2011;2:376–381. doi: 10.1007/s12975-011-0080-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen C.M., Wu C.T., Yang T.H., Liu S.H., Yang F.Y. Preventive Effect of Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound against Experimental Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury via Apoptosis Reduction and Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor Induction. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:5568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23929-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wu C.T., Yang T.H., Chen M.C., Chung Y.P., Guan S.S., Long L.H., Liu S.H., Chen C.M. Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Prevents Recurrent Ischemic Stroke in a Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Mouse Model via Brain-derived Neurotrophic Factor Induction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:5169. doi: 10.3390/ijms20205169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cho S.E., Kim Y.M., Jeong J.S., Seo Y.K. The effect of ultrasound for increasing neural differentiation in hBM-MSCs and inducing neurogenesis in ischemic stroke model. Life Sci. 2016;165:35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Daffertshofer M., Huang Z., Fatar M., Popolo M., Schroeck H., Kuschinsky W., Moskowitz M.A., Hennerici M.G. Efficacy of sonothrombolysis in a rat model of embolic ischemic stroke. Neurosci. Lett. 2004;361:115–119. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brown A.T., Flores R., Hamilton E., Roberson P.K., Borrelli M.J., Culp W.C. Microbubbles improve sonothrombolysis in vitro and decrease hemorrhage in vivo in a rabbit stroke model. Investig. Radiol. 2011;46:202–207. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318200757a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gao S., Zhang Y., Wu J., Shi W.T., Lof J., Vignon F., Drvol L., Xie F., Muirhead D., Powers J.E., et al. Improvements in cerebral blood flow and recanalization rates with transcranial diagnostic ultrasound and intravenous microbubbles after acute cerebral emboli. Investig. Radiol. 2014;49:593–600. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Culp W.C., Flores R., Brown A.T., Lowery J.D., Roberson P.K., Hennings L.J., Woods S.D., Hatton J.H., Culp B.C., Skinner R.D., et al. Successful Microbubble Sonothrombolysis without Tissue Plasminogen Activator in a Rabbit Model of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:2280–2285. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.607150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fatar M., Stroick M., Griebe M., Alonso A., Kreisel S., Kern R., Hennerici M., Meairs S. Effect of Combined Ultrasound and Microbubbles Treatment in an Experimental Model of Cerebral Ischemia. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2008;34:1414–1420. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schleicher N., Tomkins A.J., Kampschulte M., Hyvelin J.M., Botteron C., Juenemann M., Yeniguen M., Krombach G.A., Kaps M., Spratt N.J., et al. Sonothrombolysis with BR38 microbubbles improves microvascular patency in a rat model of stroke. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0152898. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Culp W.C., Porter T.R., Lowery J., Xie F., Roberson P.K., Marky L. Intracranial clot lysis with intravenous microbubbles and transcranial ultrasound in swine. Stroke. 2004;35:2407–2411. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000140890.86779.79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rodríguez-Frutos B., Otero-Ortega L., Ramos-Cejudo J., Martínez-Sánchez P., Barahona-Sanz I., Navarro-Hernanz T., Gómez-de Frutos M.C., Díez-Tejedor E., Gutiérrez-Fernández M. Enhanced brain-derived neurotrophic factor delivery by ultrasound and microbubbles promotes white matter repair after stroke. Biomaterials. 2016;100:41–52. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhao R., Jiang J., Li H., Chen M., Liu R., Sun S., De M., Liang X., Wang S. Phosphatidylserine-microbubble targeting-activated microglia/macrophage in inflammation combined with ultrasound for breaking through the blood-brain barrier. J. Neuroinflamm. 2018;15:334. doi: 10.1186/s12974-018-1368-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wang H.B., Yang L., Wu J., Sun L., Wu J., Tian H., Weisel R.D., Li R.K. Reduced ischemic injury after stroke in mice by angiogenic gene delivery via ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2014;73:548–558. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0000000000000077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mu H.M., Wang L.Y. Effect of therapeutic ultrasound on brain angiogenesis following intracerebral hemorrhage in rats. Microvasc. Res. 2015;102:11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ke Z., Ying M., Li L., Zhang S., Tong K.Y. Evaluation of transcranial Doppler flow velocity changes in intracerebral hemorrhage rats using ultrasonography. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2012;210:272–280. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stroick M., Alonso A., Fatar M., Griebe M., Kreisel S., Kern R., Gaud E., Arditi M., Hennerici M., Meairs S. Effects of simultaneous application of ultrasound and microbubbles on intracerebral hemorrhage in an animal model. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2006;32:1377–1382. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhou X., Chen L., Feng C., Li B., Tang J., Liu A., Lv F., Li T. Establishing an animal model of intracerebral hemorrhage under the guidance of ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2013;39:2116–2122. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sobbe A., Stumpff U., Trübestein G., Figge H., Kozuschek W. Die Ultraschall-Auflösung von Thromben. Klin. Wochenschr. 1974;52:1117–1121. doi: 10.1007/BF01468622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tsivgoulis G., Alexandrov A.V. Ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: Potential, failures, and safety. Neurotherapeutics. 2007;4:420–427. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mikulik R., Alexandrov A.V. Acute stroke: Therapeutic transcranial Doppler sonography. Front. Neurol. Neurosci. 2006;21:150–161. doi: 10.1159/000092397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Burgess A., Huang Y., Waspe A.C., Ganguly M., Goertz D.E., Hynynen K. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for dissolution of clots in a rabbit model of embolic stroke. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e42311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Molina C.A., Alexandrov A.V. Transcranial ultrasound in acute stroke: From diagnosis to therapy. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2007;1:1–6. doi: 10.1159/000107373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Auboire L., Sennoga C.A., Hyvelin J.M., Ossant F., Escoffre J.M., Tranquart F., Bouakaz A. Microbubbles combined with ultrasound therapy in ischemic stroke: A systematic review of in-vivo preclinical studies. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0191788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kiessling F., Fokong S., Koczera P., Lederle W., Lammers T. Ultrasound microbubbles for molecular diagnosis, therapy, and theranostics. J. Nucl. Med. 2012;53:345–348. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.099754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chen H., Hwang J.H. Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction for chemotherapeutic drug delivery to solid tumors. J. Ther. Ultrasound. 2013;1:10. doi: 10.1186/2050-5736-1-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang J.B., Di Ianni T., Vyas D.B., Huang Z., Park S., Hosseini-Nassab N., Aryal M., Airan R.D. Focused Ultrasound for Noninvasive, Focal Pharmacologic Neurointervention. Front. Neurosci. 2020;14:675. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cammalleri A., Croce P., Lee W., Yoon K., Yoo S.S. Therapeutic Potentials of Localized Blood–Brain Barrier Disruption by Noninvasive Transcranial Focused Ultrasound: A Technical Review. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2020;37:104–117. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bakay L., Ballantine J.R., Hueter T.F., Sosa D. Ultrasonically produced changes in the blood-brain barrier. AMA Arch. Neurol. Psychiatry. 1956;76:457–467. doi: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1956.02330290001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pandit R., Koh W.K., Sullivan R.K., Palliyaguru T., Parton R.G., Götz J. Role for caveolin-mediated transcytosis in facilitating transport of large cargoes into the brain via ultrasound. J. Control Release. 2020;327:667–675. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xia C.Y., Liu Y.H., Wang P., Xue Y.X. Low-frequency ultrasound irradiation increases blood–tumor barrier permeability by transcellular pathway in a rat glioma model. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2012;48:281–290. doi: 10.1007/s12031-012-9770-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Alonso A. Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Opening for Drug Delivery. Front. Neurol. Neurosci. 2015;36:106–115. doi: 10.1159/000366242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Meairs S. Facilitation of Drug Transport across the Blood–Brain Barrier with Ultrasound and Microbubbles Stephen Meairs. Pharmaceutics. 2015;7:275–293. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics7030275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Escoffre J.M., de Senneville B.D., Sasaki N., Derieppe M. Editorial: Bubbles, Droplets and Micelles for Acoustically-Mediated Drug/Gene Delivery. Front. Pharmacol. 2020;11:954. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Pérez E.S., Delgado-Mederos R., Rubiera M., Delgado P., Ribó M., Maisterra O., Ortega G., Alvarez-Sabin J., Molina C.A. Transcranial duplex sonography for monitoring hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2009;40:987–990. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.524249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Saunders N.R., Dziegielewska K.M., Møllgård K., Habgood M.D. Markers for blood-brain barrier integrity: How appropriate is Evans blue in the twenty-first century and what are the alternatives? Front. Neurosci. 2015;9:385. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Aryal M., Papademetriou I., Zhang Y.Z., Power C., McDannold N., Porter T. MRI Monitoring and Quantification of Ultrasound-Mediated Delivery of Liposomes Dually Labeled with Gadolinium and Fluorophore through the Blood-Brain Barrier. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2019;45:1733–1742. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.02.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chen D., Nie Z.B., Chi Z.H., Wang Z.Y., Wei X.T., Guan J.H. Neuroprotective Effect of ZnT3 Knockout on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Transl. Neurosci. 2018;9:26–32. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2018-0006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lapergue B., Deroide N., Pocard M., Michel J.-B., Meilhac O., Bonnin P. Transcranial duplex sonography for monitoring circle of Willis artery occlusion in a rat embolic stroke model. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2011;197:289–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Gómez-de Frutos M.C., García-Suárez I., Laso-García F., Diekhorst L., Otero-Ortega L., Alonso-López E., Díez-Tejedor E., Gutiérrez-Fernández M., Ruiz-Ares G. Identification of brain structures and blood vessels by conventional ultrasound in rats. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2020;346:108935. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Giustetto P., Filippi M., Castano M., Terreno E. Non-invasive Parenchymal, Vascular and Metabolic High-frequency Ultrasound and Photoacoustic Rat Deep Brain Imaging. J. Vis. Exp. 2015;2:52162. doi: 10.3791/52162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Riesz P., Kondo T. Free radical formation induced by ultrasound and its biological implications. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1992;13:247–270. doi: 10.1016/0891-5849(92)90021-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Karagöz I., Biri A., Babacan F., Kavutu M. Evaluation of biological effects induced by diagnostic ultrasound in the rat foetal tissues. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2007;294:217–224. doi: 10.1007/s11010-006-9262-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ter Haar G. Ultrasonic imaging: Safety considerations. Interface Focus. 2011;1:686–697. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Dijkmans P.A., Juffermans L.J., Musters R.J., van Wamel A., ten Cate F.J., van Gilst W., Visser C.A., de Jong N., Kamp O. Microbubbles and ultrasound: From diagnosis to therapy. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2004;5:245–256. doi: 10.1016/j.euje.2004.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Daffertshofer M., Hennerici M. Ultrasound in the treatment of ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:283–290. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(03)00380-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Vignon F., Shi W.T., Powers J.E., Everbach E.C., Liu J., Gao S., Xie F., Porter T.R. Microbubble cavitation imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2013;60:661–670. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Burgess A., Shah K., Hough O., Hynynen K. Focused ultrasound-mediated drug delivery through the blood-brain barrier. Rev. Neurother. 2015;15:477–491. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1028369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Nedelmann M., Ritschel N., Doenges S., Langheinrich A.C., Acker T., Reuter P., Yeniguen M., Pukropski J., Kaps M., Mueller C., et al. Combined contrast-enhanced ultrasound and rt-PA treatment is safe and improves impaired microcirculation after reperfusion of middle cerebral artery occlusion. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:1712–1720. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Schneider F., Gerriets T., Walberer M., Mueller C., Rolke R., Eicke B.M., Bohl J., Kempski O., Kaps M., Bachmann G., et al. Brain edema and intracerebral necrosis caused by transcranial low-frequency 20-kHz ultrasound: A safety study in rats. Stroke. 2006;37:1301–1306. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000217329.16739.8f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Reuter P., Masomi J., Kuntze H., Fischer I., Helling K., Sommer C., Alessandri B., Heimann A., Gerriets T., Marx J., et al. Low-frequency therapeutic ultrasound with varied duty cycle: Effects on the ischemic brain and the inner ear. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2010;36:1188–1195. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Liu D.D., Ullah M., Concepcion W., Dahl J.J., Thakor A.S. The role of ultrasound in enhancing mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2020;9:850–866. doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Maresca D., Lakshmanan A., Abedi M., Bar-Zion A., Farhadi A., Lu G.J., Szablowski J.O., Wu D., Yoo S., Shapiro M.G. Biomolecular Ultrasound and Sonogenetics. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Engl. 2018;9:229–252. doi: 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060817-084034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Macé E., Cohen I., Montaldo G., Miles R., Fink M., Tanter M. In vivo mapping of brain elasticity in small animals using shear wave imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2011;30:550–558. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2010.2079940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Macé E., Montaldo G., Cohen I., Baulac M., Fink M., Tanter M. Functional ultrasound imaging of the brain. Nat. Methods. 2011;8:662–664. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Tan J.K., Pham B., Zong Y., Perez C., Maris D.O., Hemphill A., Miao C.H., Matula T.J., Mourad P.D., Wei H., et al. Microbubbles and ultrasound increase intraventricular polyplex gene transfer to the brain. J. Control Release. 2016;231:86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Deng Z., Sheng Z., Yan F. Ultrasound-induced blood-brain-barrier opening enhances anticancer efficacy in the treatment of glioblastoma: Current status and future prospects. J. Oncol. 2019;2019:2345203. doi: 10.1155/2019/2345203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lee J., Chang W.S., Shin J., Seo Y., Kong C., Song B.W., Na Y.C., Kim B.S., Chang J.W. Non-invasively enhanced intracranial transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells using focused ultrasound mediated by overexpression of cell-adhesion molecules. Stem Cell Res. 2020;43:101726. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2020.101726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Kwon S.H., Gopal A.S. 3D and 4D Ultrasound: Current Progress and Future Perspectives. Curr. Cardiovasc. Imaging Rep. 2017;10:43. doi: 10.1007/s12410-017-9440-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Macé É., Montaldo G., Trenholm S., Cowan C., Brignall A., Urban A., Roska B. Whole-Brain Functional Ultrasound Imaging Reveals Brain Modules for Visuomotor Integration. Neuron. 2018;100:1241–1251.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.11.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gesnik M., Blaize K., Deffieux T., Gennisson J.L., Sahel J.A., Fink M., Picaud S., Tanter M. 3D functional ultrasound imaging of the cerebral visual system in rodents. Neuroimage. 2017;149:267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Rau R., Kruizinga P., Mastik F., Belau M., de Jong N., Bosch J.G., Scheffer W., Maret G. 3D functional ultrasound imaging of pigeons. Neuroimage. 2018;183:469–477. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bimbard C., Demene C., Girard C., Radtke-Chuller S., Shamma S., Tanter M., Boubenec Y. Multi-scale mapping along the auditory hierarchy using high-resolution functional UltraSound in the awake ferret. eLife. 2018;7:e35028. doi: 10.7554/eLife.35028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Demené C., Tiran E., Sieu L.A., Bergel A., Gennisson J.L., Pernot M., Deffieux T., Cohen I., Tanter M. 4D microvascular imaging based on ultrafast Doppler tomography. Neuroimage. 2016;127:472–483. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Rabut C., Correia M., Finel V., Pezet S., Pernot M., Deffieux T., Tanter M. 4D functional ultrasound imaging of whole-brain activity in rodents. Nat. Methods. 2019;16:994–997. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0572-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Vinciguerra L., Bösel J. Noninvasive neuromonitoring: Current utility in subarachnoid hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, and stroke. Neurocritical Care. 2017;27:122–140. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0361-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Camps-Renom P., Méndez J., Granell E., Casoni F., Prats-Sánchez L., Martínez-Domeño A., Guisado-Alonso D., Martí-Fàbregas J., Delgado-Mederos R. Transcranial duplex sonography predicts outcome following an intracerebral hemorrhage. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2017;38:1543–1549. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Li X., Du H., Song Z., Wang H., Tan Z., Xiao M., Zhang F. Efficacy and safety of sonothrombolysis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Neurol. Sci. 2020;416:116998. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Meairs S., Kern R., Alonso A. Why and how do microbubbles enhance the effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in cerebrovascular disease? Curr. Pharm. Des. 2012;18:2223–2235. doi: 10.2174/138161212800099982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.

