Table 1.
Sample | SMB a | BC b (0) | BC (5) | BC (10) | BC (15) | BC (20) | BC (25) | BC (50) | BC (75) | BC (100) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 1.73 × 103 | 200 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ˂100 | ˂100 |
B | 8.0 × 102 | 100 | ˂100 | ˂100 | ˂100 | ˂100 | ˂100 | ˂100 | ˂100 | ˂100 |
C | 2.92 × 105 | 600 | 633 | 600 | 666 | 566 | 433 | ˂100 | ˂100 | ˂100 |
D | 3.24 × 105 | 700 | 600 | 433 | 633 | 533 | 533 | 333 | 233 | ˂100 |
a Spore-forming mesophilic bacteria (SMB) counts. b Presumptive Bacillus cereus s.l. (BC) counts. To select colonies with ampicillin-resistance, the medium was supplemented at concentrations of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 50, 75, and 100 µg/ mL of ampicillin, indicated by numbers in parentheses. The theoretical limit of detection (LOD) was therefore 100 cfu/g. Numbers below this limit (˂100 cfu/g) in our results mean that bacterial growth was not detected in these conditions.