Skip to main content
Journal of Fungi logoLink to Journal of Fungi
. 2021 Oct 20;7(11):888. doi: 10.3390/jof7110888

Diagnostic Methods and Risk Factors for Severe Disease and Mortality in Blastomycosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Timothy R O’Dowd 1,, Jack W Mc Hugh 1, Elitza S Theel 2, Nancy L Wengenack 2, John C O’Horo 3,4, Mark J Enzler 3, Paschalis Vergidis 3,*
Editor: George Deepe
PMCID: PMC8619313  PMID: 34829177

Abstract

Background: Blastomycosis can cause severe disease with progressive respiratory failure and dissemination even in immunocompetent individuals. We sought to evaluate risk factors for severe disease and mortality using clinical and laboratory data within a large health system in an endemic area. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with blastomycosis at all Mayo Clinic sites from 1 January 2004 through 31 March 2020. Diagnosis was established by culture, histopathology/cytopathology, serology, antigen testing, or PCR. Disease was categorized as mild for patients treated in the outpatient setting, moderate for hospitalized patients who did not require intensive care, and severe for patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Logistic regression was used to evaluate risk factors for severe disease. A Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to evaluate mortality. Findings: We identified 210 patients diagnosed with blastomycosis. Mean age was 51 years (range, 6–84). Most subjects were male (71.0%). Extrapulmonary disease was confirmed in 24.8%. In this cohort, 40.5% of patients had mild disease, 37.6% had moderate disease, and 21.9% had severe disease. Independent risk factors for severe disease were neutrophilia (odds ratio (OR) 3.35 (95% CI 1.53–7.35), p = 0.002) and lymphopenia (OR 3.34 (95% CI 1.59–7.03), p = 0.001). Mortality at 90 days was 11.9%. Median time from diagnosis to death was 23 days (interquartile range 8–31 days). Independent risk factors for mortality were age (OR 1.04 (95% CI 1.01–1.08), p = 0.009), neutrophilia (OR 2.84 (95% CI 1.04–7.76), p = 0.041), and lymphopenia (OR 4.50 (95% CI 1.67–12.11), p = 0.003). Blastomyces immunodiffusion had an overall sensitivity of 39.6% (95% CI 30.1–49.8). Sensitivity was higher among those who were tested 4 weeks or longer after the onset of symptoms. Urine Blastomyces antigen had a significantly higher sensitivity of 80.8% (95% CI 68.1–89.2) compared to serology. There was a trend towards higher antigen concentration in patients with severe disease. The sensitivity of PCR from respiratory specimens was 67.6% (95% CI 50.1–85.5). Conclusion: In this cohort, we did not find an association between pharmacologic immunosuppression and disease severity. Lymphopenia at diagnosis was an independent risk factor for mortality. This simple marker may aid clinicians in determining disease prognosis.

Keywords: blastomycosis, serology, immunodiffusion, complement fixation, urine antigen, PCR, lymphopenia, amphotericin B, itraconazole

1. Introduction

Blastomyces dermatitidis and the more recently described Blastomyces gilchristii [1] are thermally dimorphic fungi endemic to the Mississippi, Ohio, and St. Lawrence River basins and the Great Lakes region of the USA and Canada. Other species have also been reported as occasional causes of human disease [2,3]. Infection is primarily acquired by inhalation of conidia and may manifest as acute or chronic pneumonia. Pulmonary infection can progress to respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Hematogenous dissemination can occur with involvement of the skin, bone, central nervous system (CNS) or other organs. Disease outbreaks have been reported [4,5]. However, most cases occur sporadically.

The diagnosis is often established by culture and/or histopathology. Serologic assays and antigen testing offer additional diagnostic tools. While not standardized, molecular identification via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is shown to be a sensitive method for the detection of Blastomyces species. Treatment is determined by disease severity. Amphotericin B is reserved for cases of severe pneumonia or disseminated disease, particularly in the immunocompromised host. Itraconazole is the mainstay of treatment for mild-to-moderate disease and is also used as step-down therapy after induction with amphotericin B. Voriconazole and the novel triazoles posaconazole and isavuconazole demonstrate in vitro activity. However, clinical experience is limited, and these agents have not been studied in clinical trials for the treatment of blastomycosis.

The diagnosis may be delayed as patients commonly present with symptoms suggestive of bacterial pneumonia and receive empiric antibacterial treatment [6,7]. Skin manifestations may provide an early clue to diagnosis [8]. An increase in the incidence of blastomycosis has been reported in recent years possibly related to climate changes [9,10]. Herein, we examine risk factors for severe disease and mortality using clinical and laboratory data within a large health system in an endemic area for blastomycosis. We also evaluate the sensitivity of the currently used diagnostic methods.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Cohort

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with blastomycosis at all Mayo Clinic sites from 1 January 2004 through 31 March 2020. The Upper Midwest Mayo Clinic Health System is comprised of a tertiary referral hospital in Rochester, Minnesota, and a network of regional hospitals in southern Minnesota and western Wisconsin; areas located in the Mississippi River basin. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Subjects were identified by review of ICD-9/ICD-10 diagnostic codes and microbiology/serology/pathology data. Disease was defined in patients with clinical and/or radiographic evidence of infection and one or more of the following: (i) isolation of Blastomyces in culture of respiratory, skin or sterile specimens, (ii) histopathologic or cytopathologic evidence of yeast consistent with Blastomyces, (iii) positive serology (immunodiffusion or complement fixation titer ≥ 1:16), (iv) positive Blastomyces antigen in urine or serum, or (v) positive Blastomyces PCR.

Disease was categorized as mild for patients treated in the outpatient setting, moderate for hospitalized patients who did not require intensive care, and severe for patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

The following variables were studied: age, sex, race/ethnicity, asthma/chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (treated with oral antidiabetic agents or insulin), renal failure (defined as creatinine ≥ 2.0 mg/dL or eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2), corticosteroid treatment (defined as use of prednisone ≥ 20 mg/day or equivalent corticosteroid dose for >4 weeks), other pharmacologic immunosuppression and presence of solid organ transplant. Neutrophilia was defined as neutrophil count ≥ 7.5 × 103 cells/microL and lymphopenia as lymphocyte count < 1.0 × 103 cells/microL. Laboratory values were abstracted at diagnosis of blastomycosis. When available, the mean of 2 values was used for differential cell count. Patients were followed up as needed for their medical care.

2.2. Diagnostic Assays

Specimens were cultured on selective fungal media (e.g., inhibitory mold agar and brain heart infusion blood agar with chloramphenicol and gentamicin with the addition of cycloheximide for respiratory specimens). Cultures were incubated for 24 days at 30 °C. Preliminary identification of fungi was based on colonial and microscopic morphology. Results were reported as Blastomyces dermatitidis/gilchristii as the two species are morphologically indistinct. Culture isolates were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry and/or D2 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing.

Since 2010 the OMEGA Blastomyces Total Antibody enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was used as a screening serologic test (IMMY, Norton, OK, USA) [11]. For positive EIA, confirmatory testing by immunodiffusion (IF) was performed. Before 2010, antibodies to the mycelial and yeast forms of Blastomyces dermatitidis were also detected by complement fixation (CF). The MVista® Quantitative Sandwich Enzyme Immunoassay was used for antigen testing (MiraVista Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Results below 0.2 ng/mL or above 14.7 ng/mL fall outside the linear range of the assay and were reported as positive below or above the limit of quantification, respectively. For the laboratory-developed real-time Blastomyces PCR assay, primers and FRET hybridization probes were designed to target a 174-base pair region of the histidine kinase (DRK-1) gene [12]. We assessed cross-reactivity with other non-culture-based assays. Urine Histoplasma antigen testing was performed using the IMMY galactomannan enzyme immunoassay. For serum and BAL (bronchoalveolar lavage) Aspergillus galactomannan we used the Platelia™ Aspergillus Ag (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). (1,3)-β-D-glucan testing was performed using the Fungitell® assay (Associates of Cape Cod, East Falmouth, MA, USA).

2.3. Statistical Methods

Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the cohort. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Continuous variables were compared using one-way ANOVA. We calculated the confidence interval of the sensitivity of diagnostic assays using the Wilson procedure without correction for continuity. Blastomyces antigen concentrations below the level of quantification were assigned a value of 0.2. Concentrations above the level of quantification were assigned a value of 14.7. Univariate logistic regression was used to evaluate risk factors for severe disease. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were determined for each risk factor. Factors found to be associated with severe disease at the 0.10 significance level in univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model. We assessed 90-day mortality. Day 0 was considered the day that antifungal treatment was initiated (for patients who did not receive antifungal treatment, or their treatment was unknown, day 0 was considered the day of diagnosis). A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to evaluate mortality. Variables with p-values < 0.10 were included in the multivariable model. Survival functions were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare survival distributions. All comparisons were considered significant for p-value < 0.05 (two-tailed test). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA, version 16.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) and GraphPad Prism, version 8.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

We identified 210 patients diagnosed with blastomycosis during the study period (Table 1). Diagnosis was based on culture in 140 subjects, pathology in 46, Blastomyces antigen in 11, Blastomyces serology in 11, and PCR in 2. Cases by year of diagnosis are shown in Supplementary Table S1. Mean age at diagnosis was 51 years (range, 6–84). Most were male (71.0%, 149/210). In our cohort, 21.9% (46/210) were receiving pharmacologic immunosuppression. None were diagnosed with HIV infection. The diagnosis of blastomycosis was established by culture of respiratory specimens in 61.9% (130/210). Extrapulmonary disease was diagnosed by culture or histopathology in 24.8% (52/210). Of those, 19 had disease limited to the skin or subcutaneous tissue, all of whom were treated as outpatients. CNS involvement was diagnosed in 2.9% (CSF culture and histopathology (1), histopathology alone (1), CSF serology (1), CSF Blastomyces antigen (1), MRI abnormalities (2)). Histopathology showed granulomatous inflammation in 56.7% (68/120) and presence of yeast in 65.8% (79/120) of biopsied specimens. In terms of radiographic findings, pulmonary nodule or mass was found in 69.4% (120/173), consolidation in 46.8% (81/173) and cavity in 21.4% (37/173).

Table 1.

Epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of the cohort (n = 210).

Characteristic % (N)
Male Sex 71.9 (149/210)
Race/Ethnicity
White 82.4 (173/210)
Black 3.8 (8/210)
Asian 3.8 (8/210)
American Indian 1.4 (3/210)
Hispanic 4.3 (9/210)
Unknown 8.6 (18/210)
State of Residence
Minnesota 43.3 (91/210)
Wisconsin 17.6 (37/210)
Iowa 13.3 (28/210)
Illinois 4.3 (9/210)
Michigan 3.8 (8/210)
North Dakota 3.8 (8/210)
Other 13.8 (29/210)
Comorbidities
Asthma/COPD 9.0 (19/210)
Diabetes mellitus 22.9 (48/210)
Renal failure 1 7.3 (14/193)
Obesity 2 33.9 (65/192)
Corticosteroid treatment 3 7.1 (15/210)
Pharmacologic immunosuppression 4 18.6 (39/210)
Solid organ transplant 8.1 (17/210)
Extrapulmonary Disease 24.8 (52/210)
Diagnosis Confirmed by Culture
Respiratory secretions/Lung tissue 60.0 (126/210)
Skin/soft tissue 11.0 (23/210)
Paranasal sinus/Larynx 1.4 (3/210)
Bone/Synovial Fluid 1.4 (3/210)
Central Nervous System 0.5 (1/210)
Bone Marrow 0.5 (1/210)
Blood 0.5 (1/210)
Urine 0.5 (1/210)
Diagnosis confirmed by Histopathology
Lung 62.0 (75/121)
Skin/soft tissue 24.8 (30/121)
Mediastinal lymph node 6.6 (8/121)
Pleura 0.8 (1/121)
Vocal cord 1.7 (2/121)
Mastoid 0.8 (1/121)
Bone 1.7 (2/121)
Brain 1.7 (2/121)
Spleen 0.8 (1/121)
Histopathologic Findings
Granulomatous Inflammation 56.7 (68/120)
Presence of Yeast 37.1 (78/120)
Pulmonary Radiographic Findings
Consolidation 46.8 (81/173)
Nodule/Mass 69.4 (120/173)
Cavity 21.4 (37/173)
Antifungal Treatment *
Liposomal Amphotericin B 38.9 (81/208)
Itraconazole 81.3 (169/208)
Voriconazole 14.4 (30/208)
Fluconazole 2.8 (7/208)
Posaconazole 2.8 (6/208)
Isavuconazole 0.5 (1/208)
No treatment 2.8 (6/208)

1 Renal failure: creatinine ≥ 2.0 mg/dL or eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. 2 Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). 3 Prednisone ≥ 20 mg/day (or equivalent corticosteroid dose) for ≥4 weeks. 4 Includes corticosteroid treatment. * Treatment not known in 2 patients.

In this cohort, 40.5% (85/210) of patients were treated as outpatients (mild disease), 37.6% (79/210) were admitted to the hospital but did not receive intensive care (moderate disease), and 21.9% (46/210) were admitted to the ICU (severe disease). Mechanical ventilation was required for 14.8% (31/210) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for 1.4% (3/210). Older age, COPD, diabetes mellitus, obesity, extrapulmonary disease and immunosuppressive therapy were not associated with the need for ICU admission. Independent risk factors for severe disease were lymphopenia and neutrophilia at the time of diagnosis (Table 2). Mortality at 90 days was 11.9% (25/210) (2.4% (2/85) for mild disease, 5.1% (4/79) for moderate disease, 41.3% (19/46) for severe disease). Median time from diagnosis to death was 23 days (IQR (interquartile range), 8–31 days). The main cause of death was multiorgan failure. Independent risk factors for mortality were age, neutrophilia, and lymphopenia (Table 3). Survival curves grouped by age and lymphopenia are shown in Figure 1.

Table 2.

Risk factors for severe disease.

Mild/Moderate Disease (n = 164) Severe Disease (n = 46) Univariate
Odds Ratio (95% CI)
p-Value Multivariate
Odds Ratio (95% CI)
p-Value
Age in years
Mean (SD)
51.2 (18.13) 51.3 (18.81) 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 0.960
Male Sex 70.1 (115/164) 73.9 (34/46) 1.21 (0.58–2.53) 0.617
Race
White 91.3 (136/149) 86.1 (37/43) Reference
Black 3.4 (5/149) 7.0 (3/43) 2.21 (0.50–9.66) 0.294
Asian 4.7 (7/149) 2.3 (1/43) 0.53 (0.06–4.40) 0.553
American Indian 0.7 (1/149) 4.7 (2/43) 7.35 (0.65–83.32) 0.107
Hispanic 3.7 (5/135) 0 -
Asthma/COPD 9.8 (16/164) 6.5 (3/46) 0.65 (0.18–2.32) 0.502
Diabetes mellitus
All 23.2 (38/164) 21.7 (10/46) 0.92 (0.42–2.03) 0.838
Insulin-Dependent 7.9 (13/164) 13.0 (6/46) 1.74 (0.62–4.87) 0.290
Renal Failure 5.4 (8/149) 15.6 (7/45) 3.25 (1.11–9.52) 0.032 2.43 (0.79–7.46) 0.119
Obesity 31.5 (47/149) 41.9 (18/43) 1.56 (0.78–3.14) 0.210
Extrapulmonary Disease 26.2 (43/164) 19.6 (9/46) 0.68 (0.31–1.53) 0.357
Corticosteroid Treatment 7.9 (13/164) 4.4 (2/46) 0.53 (0.11–2.43) 0.412
Pharmacologic Immunosuppression 19.5 (32/164) 15.2 (7/46) 0.74 (0.30–1.81) 0.509
Solid Organ Transplant 6.7 (11/164) 10.9 (5/46) 1.70 (0.56–5.16) 0.352
Neutrophilia 1 43.1 (59/137) 72.7 (32/44) 3.52 (1.67–7.42) 0.001 3.35 (1.53–7.35) 0.002
Lymphopenia 2 27.7 (38/137) 59.1 (26/44) 3.76 (1.85–7.64) <0.001 3.34 (1.59–7.03) 0.001

Data are presented as percentages (absolute numbers shown in parentheses), unless otherwise indicated. CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 1 Neutrophil count ≥ 7.5 × 103cells/microL. 2 Lymphocyte count < 1.0 × 103 cells/microL.

Table 3.

Risk factors for 90-day mortality.

Survivors
(n = 185)
Non-Survivors
(n = 25)
Univariate
Hazards Ratio (95% CI)
p-Value Multivariate
Hazards Ratio (95% CI)
p-Value
Age in years
mean (SD)
49.9 (1.33) 60.8 (3.37) 1.04 (1.01–1.07) 0.007 1.04 (1.01–1.08) 0.009
Male Sex 71.4 (132/185) 68.0 (17/25) 0.85 (0.35–2.10) 0.729
Race/Ethnicity
White 90.6 (154/170) 86.4 (19/22) Reference
Black 3.5 (6/170) 9.1 (2/22) 2.71 (0.63–11.62) 0.181
Asian 4.7 (8/170) 0 -
American Indian 1.2 (2/170) 4.6 (1/22) 3.19 (0.43–23.83) 0.259
Hispanic 2.6 (4/156) 5.9 (1/17) 2.26 (0.29–16.53) 0.447
Asthma/COPD 9.7 (18/185) 4.0 (1/25) 0.39 (0.49–3.03) 0.366
Diabetes mellitus
All 23.2 (43/185) 20.0 (5/25) 0.83 (0.29–2.33) 0.717
Insulin-Dependent 8.7 (16/185) 12.0 (3/25) 1.44 (0.39–5.34) 0.585
Renal Failure 5.9 (10/169) 20.0 (5/25) 3.98 (1.23–12.81) 0.021 2.51 (0.70–8.92) 0.156
Obesity 33.7 (57/169) 34.8 (8/23) 1.05 (0.42–2.63) 0.920
Extrapulmonary Disease 26.5 (49/185) 12.0 (3/25) 0.38 (0.11–1.32) 0.128
Corticosteroid Treatment 7.0 (13/185) 8.0 (2/25) 1.15 (0.24–5.43) 0.859
Pharmacologic Immunosuppression 17.8 (33/185) 24.0 (6/25) 1.45 (0.54–3.92) 0.459
Solid Organ Transplant 7.0 (13/185) 12.0 (3/25) 1.80 (0.48–6.83) 0.385
Neutrophilia 1 47.8 (75/157) 66.7 (16/24) 2.19 (0.88–5.40) 0.090 2.84 (1.04–7.76) 0.041
Lymphopenia 2 29.9 (47/157) 70.8 (17/24) 5.68 (2.21–14.61) <0.001 4.50 (1.67–12.11) 0.003

Data on survivors and non-survivors are presented as percentages (absolute numbers shown in parentheses), unless otherwise indicated. CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 1 Neutrophil count ≥ 7.5 × 103cells/microL. 2 Lymphocyte count < 1.0 × 103 cells/microL.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cumulative 90-day survival grouped by age and presence of lymphopenia at diagnosis. L: lymphocyte count.

Diagnostic assays performed on respiratory specimens are shown in Table 4. KOH/calcofluor white smear was positive in 46.7% (42/90). Sensitivity was higher in BAL/bronchial washings compared to sputum, although this difference did not reach statistical significance. BAL fluid analysis was performed in 33 patients. Medial count of total nucleated cells was 77/microL (IQR, 19–409). Neutrophils were the predominant cells in 57.6% (19/33) and alveolar macrophages in 42.4% (14/33). The sensitivity of PCR from respiratory specimens was 67.6% (45.5% for sputum, 76.9% for lower respiratory tract specimens). CSF PCR was negative in all three specimens of patients with CNS blastomycosis.

Table 4.

Sensitivity of KOH smear and PCR in respiratory specimens (sensitivity shown as percentage, 95% confidence intervals shown in parentheses).

All Respiratory Specimens Sputum Lower Respiratory Tract Specimens p-Value *
KOH/Calcofluor White Smear 46.7 39.1 49.3 0.47
(36.2–57.4) (20.5–61.2) (37.0–61.6)
42/90 9/23 33/67
PCR 67.6 45.5 76.9 0.12
(50.1–81.5) (18.1–75.4) (55.9–90.3)
25/37 5/11 20/26

Bronchoalveolar lavage Aspergillus galactomannan was positive in 7 of 19 specimens (Sensitivity 36.8% (95% CI, 17.2–61.4)). * Comparison between sputum and lower respiratory tract specimens (tracheal secretions, bronchial washings, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid).

Findings of serologic and antigen testing are shown in Table 5. Blastomyces immunodiffusion had a sensitivity of 39.6% and complement fixation of 22.9%. There was no difference in sensitivity between pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease. Sensitivity of immunodiffusion was higher among those who were tested 4 weeks or longer after the onset of symptoms compared to those who were tested earlier (51.9% (28/54) vs. 24.0% (6/25), p = 0.03). Sensitivity was similar between immunocompetent and immunosuppressed individuals (40.3% (29/72) vs. 36.8% (7/19), p = 1.00), even after excluding patients who were diagnosed in less than 4 weeks after the onset of symptoms.

Table 5.

Sensitivity of diagnostic assays in patients with disease confirmed by culture and/or histopathology with comparison between pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease.

All Pulmonary Disease Extrapulmonary Disease p-Value *
Blastomyces EIA 52.1 47.3 68.8 0.13
(40.7–63.3) (34.7–60.2) (44.4–85.8)
37/71 26/55 11/16
Blastomyces Immunodiffusion 39.6 36.1 52.6 0.19
(30.1–49.8) (26.0–47.7) (31.7–72.7)
36/91 26/72 10/19
Blastomyces Complement Fixation 22.9 17.9 42.9 0.31
(12.1–39.0) (7.9–35.6) (15.8–75.0)
8/35 5/28 3/7
Urine Blastomyces Antigen 80.8 87.8 54.6 0.03
(68.1–89.2) (74.5–94.7) (28.0–78.7)
42/52 36/41 6/11
Serum Blastomyces Antigen 64.3 66.7 60.0 1.00
(38.8–83.7) (35.4–87.9) (23.1–88.2)
9/14 6/9 3/5
Histoplasma Complement Fixation 17.9 17.9 None -
(7.9–35.6) (7.9–35.6)
5/28 5/28
Histoplasma Immunodiffusion 0/7 0/7 None -
Urine Histoplasma Antigen 58.8 58.6 60.0 1.00
(42.2–73.6) (40.7–74.5) (23.1–88.2)
20/34 17/29 3/5

EIA: enzyme immunoassay, BAL: bronchoalveolar lavage. * Comparison between sputum and lower respiratory tract specimens (tracheal secretions, bronchial washings, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid).

Urine Blastomyces antigen had a significantly higher sensitivity of 80.8% compared to serology. There was a trend towards higher antigen concentration in patients with severe disease (Figure 2). Urine antigen sensitivity was higher in patients with pulmonary disease compared to those with extrapulmonary infection confirmed by culture and/or histopathology. In patients with positive Blastomyces serology we noted cross-reactivity with the Histoplasma complement fixation assay. However, none of the seven tested patients had positive Histoplasma immunodiffusion. There was also cross-reactivity with urine Histoplasma antigen. Of note, BAL Aspergillus galactomannan was positive in 7 of 19 patients with culture-proven blastomycosis. Serum Aspergillus galactomannan was negative in all 36 tested patients. (1,3)-β-D-glucan was positive in 1 of 12 patients at a value of 252 pg/mL without evidence of other concomitant fungal infection.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Disease severity and Blastomyces urine antigen level. Horizontal lines represent mean values (p = 0.06).

In terms of antifungal therapy, 38.9% (81/208) of patients received induction treatment with a formulation of amphotericin B. Of patients treated with an azole (with or without induction with amphotericin B), 90.7% (166/183) received itraconazole and 9.3% (17/183) voriconazole as the first azole. As shown in Supplementary Table S2, voriconazole was more commonly used as the first azole in patients with CNS involvement. All other clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups.

Three patients (1.4%) had disease relapse/recurrence. Their clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 6. None of the patients had a known immunocompromising condition. Based on clinical review, patient 1 probably had re-exposure to Blastomyces conidia that led to the recurrence with pulmonary consolidation on the contralateral lung. Patient 2 had chronic cavitary blastomycosis. After the first disease relapse, she had persistent low-positive antigen concentrations, and eventually developed a new masslike consolidation in the inferior margins of the cavity. Patient 3 appeared to have partial response to initial treatment with itraconazole (drug concentration was not measured) and was retreated with posaconazole after he was found to have new bone abnormalities.

Table 6.

Clinical characteristics of patients with recurrent/relapsed disease.

Age/Sex Radiographic Findings Diagnosis Treatment/Relapse
62 M Dense left lower lobe consolidation Culture of bronchial washings Itraconazole for 7 months
Recurrence after 12 months
Dense right lower lobe consolidation BAL culture Itraconazole for 6 months
54 F Right apical lung cavity and irregular nodules BAL DNA probe Itraconazole for 15 months
Relapse after 23 months
Thickening of the cavity wall and cavitating nodules Urine Antigen (2.73 ng/mL) Itraconazole for 24 months
Relapse after 8 months
Masslike consolidation in the inferior margins of the cavity Urine Antigen (2.43 ng/mL) Itraconazole for 14 months Voriconazole for 25 months
31 M Right upper lobe mass with rib invasion Chest wall soft tissue biopsy: granulomatous inflammation Itraconazole for 9 months
Relapse after 9 months
New T12 vertebral body lesion Vertebral body biopsy negative for microorganisms, negative culture Posaconazole for 12 months

4. Discussion

We reviewed clinical characteristics, diagnostic methods and outcomes in patients diagnosed with blastomycosis over a 16-year period. Our cohort includes 210 patients of whom 20.5% had an underlying immunocompromising condition and 24.8% had evidence of extrapulmonary dissemination. We found that neutrophilia and lymphopenia at the time of diagnosis were independent risk factors for severe disease. Pharmacologic immunosuppression was not found to be associated with the severity of illness. In a recent single center retrospective study conducted in Wisconsin, immunosuppression was associated with severe disease and increased mortality [13], a finding that was not replicated in our cohort. Both studies covered approximately the same period and noted similar rates of dissemination between immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals. In another retrospective study conducted in Indiana, diabetes mellitus and immunosuppression were found to be associated with ICU admission [14], which is also in contrast to our findings. We note that in the latter study high-dose corticosteroid use was defined as prednisone ≥ 10 mg/day for >2 weeks, whereas in our study we considered immunosuppressed those receiving ≥ 20 mg/day for >4 weeks. As blastomycosis is a rare condition limited to certain geographic areas, it is difficult to make definitive conclusions on the impact of immunosuppression or other comorbidities on disease outcomes. Microsatellite typing of B. dermatitidis isolates suggested that clinical characteristics may be associated with genetic variation of the organism [15]. Blastomycosis can cause severe disease with progression to ARDS in previously healthy individuals.

In our cohort, 90-day all-cause mortality was 11.9%. We identified increasing age as an independent risk factor for mortality, which is consistent with previous nationwide studies [16,17]. In a large analysis of 1216 blastomycosis-related deaths, using data from the National Center for Health Statistics, mortality was significantly higher in men [16]. These data were derived from US death certificates and included information coded by the International Classification of Diseases. However, in an analysis of 1848 patients with blastomycosis from the National Inpatient Sample, an all-payer database that captures approximately 20% of US hospitalizations, female gender was independently associated with increased mortality in those who required mechanical ventilation [17], a finding not observed in other studies. We also did not find an association between sex and increased mortality.

Cell-mediated immunity is considered the major host defense against dimorphic fungi. In our study, we had access to detailed laboratory data for most patients. We identified lymphopenia as a risk factor for severe disease and mortality, even after accounting for the effect of immunosuppressive treatment (corticosteroids or other). None of the patients in our cohort were known to be infected with HIV. T-lymphocyte subsets were not obtained thus not allowing for further characterization of the immune profile. A decrease in T-helper lymphocytes was previously reported in patients with untreated pulmonary blastomycosis and an increase in T-helper cell count following antifungal therapy corresponded with clinical improvement [18]. More recent research aimed at fungal vaccine development has demonstrated the protective effect of Interleukin-17A and T-helper type 17 cells against Blastomyces [19]. Based on our findings, lymphopenia at presentation is a simple marker that can aid in disease prognostication.

Most patients were expectedly residing in Minnesota and Wisconsin given the geographic location of the Mayo Clinic Health System in the upper Midwest. We noted an increase in the number of cases diagnosed at our institution between 2017 and 2019. We did not perform a population-based study and thus conclusions on the incidence of the disease cannot be drawn. However, the upwards trend in the recent years is consistent with the epidemiologic findings throughout Minnesota which prompted a public health advisory in 2019 [20]. As in previous studies [7,9], we report that the disease is more common in men. This has been attributed to exposure during outdoor activities. In our study, the disease was most commonly diagnosed in white individuals. In Minnesota, higher incidence has been reported among American Indian/Alaska natives (2.7/100,000 population) [7]. Studies in other geographic locations have shown a higher incidence among black patients [21], Aboriginal Canadian [22] and the Hmong population in Wisconsin, possibly related to genetic predisposition [23]. The small proportion of non-white patients in our study precluded an analysis of disease severity and mortality in other racial groups.

Standard of care for patients with severe disease consists of a lipid formulation of amphotericin B followed by step-down therapy to a triazole. As patients may be intolerant to itraconazole, there has been an increased interest in the use of novel triazoles for the management of endemic mycoses. In a single-center retrospective cohort study, use of voriconazole as initial or step-down treatment for histoplasmosis was associated with higher 42-day mortality compared to itraconazole [24]. In our cohort, patients with CNS disease were more likely to be treated with voriconazole given its better penetration into brain tissue [25]. Thus, we decided not to compare outcomes based on the selected azole therapy since CNS disease is associated with higher mortality. In our review we describe causes of disease recurrence/relapse. Individuals residing in endemic areas may get re-exposed. Chronic cavitary disease, which has mainly been described with aspergillosis and histoplasmosis, can also occur in blastomycosis and disease may recur after discontinuation of azole therapy. Finally, dissemination can occur in the setting of partially treated pulmonary disease.

Urine Blastomyces antigen was the most sensitive diagnostic assay consistent with findings from previous studies [26,27]. Its performance was similar in patients with pulmonary and disseminated disease. In addition, our findings suggest that antigen level correlates with disease severity, thus providing a prognostic tool to clinicians. Serial measurements of urine Blastomyces antigen has been found useful in monitoring response to therapy [28]. The serum Blastomyces antigen assay was less sensitive. Using the largest number of serum specimens reported thus far, we provide an update on the utility of serologic testing [29,30]. We found that Blastomyces EIA, immunodiffusion, and complement fixation have a low sensitivity. It has been concluded elsewhere that ordering urine Blastomyces antigen for suspected disease without serology testing is associated with lower healthcare expenses without compromising sensitivity [31]. We found a high sensitivity of PCR on respiratory specimens. We note that the PCR assay was developed in-house and is not available in other laboratories. Our study was not designed to evaluate the specificity of the diagnostic assays.

Blastomyces antigen cross-reacts with assays for histoplasmosis or other endemic mycoses [32]. We found a higher sensitivity of the urine Blastomyces antigen compared to urine Histoplasma antigen for the diagnosis of culture-/histopathology-confirmed blastomycosis. The difference did not reach statistical significance yet demonstrates the value of dual testing in endemic areas. In terms of serologic assays, we noted cross-reactivity with Histoplasma complement fixation but not immunodiffusion. This finding can assist in distinguishing between the two entities when culture results are not available. We previously reported positive BAL Aspergillus galactomannan in patients with histoplasmosis [33]. In the current study, we demonstrate BAL galactomannan positivity in a percentage of patients with blastomycosis. Clinicians should be aware of the cross-reactivity, particularly when evaluating immunocompromised hosts at risk for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

Our study has several strengths. The Upper Midwest Mayo Clinic Health System covers an area that is highly endemic for the disease, and this is one of the largest cohorts of patients with blastomycosis from a single institution. Our analysis is based on detailed clinical, laboratory and microbiology data. No patients were lost to follow-up by 90 days. Due to its retrospective design the study has inherent limitations. Practices over the 16-year period of the study have changed (particularly in the ICU setting) and this may have had an impact on outcomes. For some patients the results of certain diagnostic assays (such as differential cell count, serology or Blastomyces antigen) were not available. The diagnosis of blastomycosis may have been delayed, and subsequently the laboratory results and imaging studies were obtained at varying stages in the course of the disease. Finally, our findings may not be generalizable to non-white individuals.

Our findings provide further insight into the epidemiology and outcomes of blastomycosis and set the framework for future research. Patients belonging to different racial or ethnic groups should be further studied to determine potential disparities in the outcomes of blastomycosis. Studies in specific immunocompromised populations may elucidate characteristics in relation to the net state of immunosuppression. The finding of lymphopenia as a marker of disease severity can be further explored to characterize immunologic deficits contributing to increased mortality in blastomycosis. Our study demonstrated the poor sensitivity of the currently available serologic assays. Novel methods such as enzyme immunoassay detection of antibodies against the B. dermatitidis surface protein BAD-1 (not used in our study) may improve diagnostics [34].

In this work, we reviewed cases of blastomycosis at a large health system in an area of endemicity. Unlike previous studies, we did not find an association between immunosuppressive therapy or other comorbidities and disease severity. We confirmed the higher sensitivity of Blastomyces antigen and PCR testing compared to other diagnostic assays. Older age, neutrophilia and lymphopenia at diagnosis were independent risk factors for mortality and these markers may aid clinicians in determining disease prognosis.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Mayo Clinic Department of Medicine Catalyst Award for Advancing in Academics (P.V.). Presented in part at the virtual IDWeek Meeting, 21–25 October 2020 and 10th Trends in Medical Mycology (TIMM), 8–11 October 2021, Aberdeen, UK.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof7110888/s1, Table S1. Number of cases per year, Table S2. Comparison of characteristics in patients receiving itraconazole or voriconazole as first azole.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.J.E. and P.V.; methodology, T.R.O., E.S.T. and P.V.; formal analysis, T.R.O. and P.V.; resources, P.V.; data curation, T.R.O., J.W.M.H., E.S.T., N.L.W. and J.C.O.; writing—original draft preparation, T.R.O., J.W.M.H. and P.V.; writing—review and editing, E.S.T., N.L.W., J.C.O. and M.J.E.; supervision, P.V.; funding acquisition, P.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Mayo Clinic IRB (19-011153).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective design of the study. All subjects have provided research authorization per Minnesota law.

Conflicts of Interest

P.V. has received research funding from Cidara and Scynexis, and has served as DSMB member for AbbVie, Algernon and Vanda Pharmaceuticals (all paid to Mayo Clinic).

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Brown E.M., McTaggart L.R., Zhang S.X., Low D.E., Stevens D.A., Richardson S.E. Phylogenetic analysis reveals a cryptic species Blastomyces gilchristii, sp. nov. within the human pathogenic fungus Blastomyces dermatitidis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e59237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Maphanga T.G., Birkhead M., Munoz J.F., Allam M., Zulu T.G., Cuomo C.A., Schwartz I.S., Ismail A., Naicker S.D., Mpembe R.S., et al. Human Blastomycosis in South Africa Caused by Blastomyces percursus and Blastomyces emzantsi sp. nov., 1967 to 2014. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020;58 doi: 10.1128/JCM.01661-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schwartz I.S., Wiederhold N.P., Hanson K.E., Patterson T.F., Sigler L. Blastomyces helicus, a New Dimorphic Fungus Causing Fatal Pulmonary and Systemic Disease in Humans and Animals in Western Canada and the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019;68:188–195. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pfister J.R., Archer J.R., Hersil S., Boers T., Reed K.D., Meece J.K., Anderson J.L., Burgess J.W., Sullivan T.D., Klein B.S., et al. Non-rural point source blastomycosis outbreak near a yard waste collection site. Clin. Med. Res. 2011;9:57–65. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2010.958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roy M., Benedict K., Deak E., Kirby M.A., McNiel J.T., Sickler C.J., Eckardt E., Marx R.K., Heffernan R.T., Meece J.K., et al. A large community outbreak of blastomycosis in Wisconsin with geographic and ethnic clustering. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013;57:655–662. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alpern J.D., Bahr N.C., Vazquez-Benitez G., Boulware D.R., Sellman J.S., Sarosi G.A. Diagnostic Delay and Antibiotic Overuse in Acute Pulmonary Blastomycosis. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2016;3:ofw078. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ireland M., Klumb C., Smith K., Scheftel J. Blastomycosis in Minnesota, USA, 1999-2018. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020;26:866–875. doi: 10.3201/eid2605.191074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lemos L.B., Baliga M., Guo M. Blastomycosis: The great pretender can also be an opportunist. Initial clinical diagnosis and underlying diseases in 123 patients. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 2002;6:194–203. doi: 10.1053/adpa.2002.34575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Seitz A.E., Younes N., Steiner C.A., Prevots D.R. Incidence and trends of blastomycosis-associated hospitalizations in the United States. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e105466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.van Rhijn N., Bromley M. The Consequences of Our Changing Environment on Life Threatening and Debilitating Fungal Diseases in Humans. J. Fungi. 2021;7:367. doi: 10.3390/jof7050367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Blastomyces Ab Enzyme Immunoassay. [(accessed on 1 October 2021)]. Available online: https://www.immy.com/blasto.
  • 12.Babady N.E., Buckwalter S.P., Hall L., Le Febre K.M., Binnicker M.J., Wengenack N.L. Detection of Blastomyces dermatitidis and Histoplasma capsulatum from culture isolates and clinical specimens by use of real-time PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011;49:3204–3208. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00673-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McBride J.A., Sterkel A.K., Matkovic E., Broman A.T., Gibbons-Burgener S.N., Gauthier G.M. Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes in Immunocompetent and Immunocompromised Patients With Blastomycosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021;72:1594–1602. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Azar M.M., Assi R., Relich R.F., Schmitt B.H., Norris S., Wheat L.J., Hage C.A. Blastomycosis in Indiana: Clinical and Epidemiologic Patterns of Disease Gleaned from a Multicenter Retrospective Study. Chest. 2015;148:1276–1284. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Meece J.K., Anderson J.L., Gruszka S., Sloss B.L., Sullivan B., Reed K.D. Variation in clinical phenotype of human infection among genetic groups of Blastomyces dermatitidis. J. Infect. Dis. 2013;207:814–822. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Khuu D., Shafir S., Bristow B., Sorvillo F. Blastomycosis mortality rates, United States, 1990–2010. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014;20:1789–1794. doi: 10.3201/eid2011.131175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rush B., Lother S., Paunovic B., Mooney O., Kumar A. Outcomes With Severe Blastomycosis and Respiratory Failure in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021;72:1603–1607. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jacobs R.F., Marmer D.J., Balk R.A., Bradsher R.W. Lymphocyte subpopulations of blood and alveolar lavage in blastomycosis. Chest. 1985;88:579–585. doi: 10.1378/chest.88.4.579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wuthrich M., Gern B., Hung C.Y., Ersland K., Rocco N., Pick-Jacobs J., Galles K., Filutowicz H., Warner T., Evans M., et al. Vaccine-induced protection against 3 systemic mycoses endemic to North America requires Th17 cells in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2011;121:554–568. doi: 10.1172/JCI43984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Health Advisory: Increase in Blastomycosis Cases. [(accessed on 1 October 2021)]. Available online: https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/ep/han/2019/sep5blasto.pdf.
  • 21.Cano M.V., Ponce-de-Leon G.F., Tippen S., Lindsley M.D., Warwick M., Hajjeh R.A. Blastomycosis in Missouri: Epidemiology and risk factors for endemic disease. Epidemiol. Infect. 2003;131:907–914. doi: 10.1017/S0950268803008987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dalcin D., Ahmed S.Z. Blastomycosis in northwestern Ontario, 2004 to 2014. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2015;26:259–262. doi: 10.1155/2015/468453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Merkhofer R.M., Jr., O’Neill M.B., Xiong D., Hernandez-Santos N., Dobson H., Fites J.S., Shockey A.C., Wuethrich M., Pepperell C.S., Klein B.S. Investigation of Genetic Susceptibility to Blastomycosis Reveals Interleukin-6 as a Potential Susceptibility Locus. mBio. 2019;10 doi: 10.1128/mBio.01224-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hendrix M.J., Larson L., Rauseo A.M., Rutjanawech S., Franklin A.D., Powderly W.G., Spec A. Voriconazole versus Itraconazole for the Initial and Step-Down Treatment of Histoplasmosis: A Retrospective Cohort. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020:ciaa1555. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Weiler S., Fiegl D., MacFarland R., Stienecke E., Bellmann-Weiler R., Dunzendorfer S., Joannidis M., Bellmann R. Human tissue distribution of voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011;55:925–928. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00949-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Durkin M., Witt J., Lemonte A., Wheat B., Connolly P. Antigen assay with the potential to aid in diagnosis of blastomycosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004;42:4873–4875. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4873-4875.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Connolly P., Hage C.A., Bariola J.R., Bensadoun E., Rodgers M., Bradsher R.W., Jr., Wheat L.J. Blastomyces dermatitidis antigen detection by quantitative enzyme immunoassay. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:53–56. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05248-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Frost H.M., Novicki T.J. Blastomyces Antigen Detection for Diagnosis and Management of Blastomycosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015;53:3660–3662. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02352-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Klein B.S., Kuritsky J.N., Chappell W.A., Kaufman L., Green J., Davies S.F., Williams J.E., Sarosi G.A. Comparison of the enzyme immunoassay, immunodiffusion, and complement fixation tests in detecting antibody in human serum to the A antigen of Blastomyces dermatitidis. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1986;133:144–148. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1986.133.1.144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Klein B.S., Vergeront J.M., Kaufman L., Bradsher R.W., Kumar U.N., Mathai G., Varkey B., Davis J.P. Serological tests for blastomycosis: Assessments during a large point-source outbreak in Wisconsin. J. Infect. Dis. 1987;155:262–268. doi: 10.1093/infdis/155.2.262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Baumgardner D.J. Use of Urine Antigen Testing for Blastomyces in an Integrated Health System. J. Patient Cent. Res. Rev. 2018;5:176–182. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wheat J., Wheat H., Connolly P., Kleiman M., Supparatpinyo K., Nelson K., Bradsher R., Restrepo A. Cross-reactivity in Histoplasma capsulatum variety capsulatum antigen assays of urine samples from patients with endemic mycoses. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1997;24:1169–1171. doi: 10.1086/513647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vergidis P., Walker R.C., Kaul D.R., Kauffman C.A., Freifeld A.G., Slagle D.C., Kressel A.B., Wheat L.J. False-positive Aspergillus galactomannan assay in solid organ transplant recipients with histoplasmosis. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2012;14:213–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2011.00675.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Richer S.M., Smedema M.L., Durkin M.M., Brandhorst T.T., Hage C.A., Connolly P.A., Leland D.S., Davis T.E., Klein B.S., Wheat L.J. Development of a highly sensitive and specific blastomycosis antibody enzyme immunoassay using Blastomyces dermatitidis surface protein BAD-1. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2014;21:143–146. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00597-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Journal of Fungi are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES