Skip to main content
Karger Author's Choice logoLink to Karger Author's Choice
. 2021 Sep 2;52(8):673–683. doi: 10.1159/000518240

Urine Alpha-1-Microglobulin Levels and Acute Kidney Injury, Mortality, and Cardiovascular Events following Cardiac Surgery

Jonathan G Amatruda a,b, Michelle M Estrella a,b,c, Amit X Garg d,e, Heather Thiessen-Philbrook f, Eric McArthur e, Steven G Coca g, Chirag R Parikh f, Michael G Shlipak b,h,*
PMCID: PMC8619798  PMID: 34515046

Abstract

Introduction

Urine alpha-1-microglobulin (Uα1m) elevations signal proximal tubule dysfunction. In ambulatory settings, higher Uα1m is associated with acute kidney injury (AKI), progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD), cardiovascular (CV) events, and mortality. We investigated the associations of pre- and postoperative Uα1m concentrations with adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery.

Methods

In 1,464 adults undergoing cardiac surgery in the prospective multicenter Translational Research Investigating Biomarker Endpoints for Acute Kidney Injury (TRIBE-AKI) cohort, we measured the pre-and postoperative Uα1m concentrations and calculated the changes from pre- to postoperative concentrations. Outcomes were postoperative AKI during index hospitalization and longitudinal risks for CKD incidence and progression, CV events, and all-cause mortality after discharge. We analyzed Uα1m continuously and categorically by tertiles using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for demographics, surgery characteristics, comorbidities, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, urine albumin, and urine creatinine.

Results

There were 230 AKI events during cardiac surgery hospitalization; during median 6.7 years of follow-up, there were 212 cases of incident CKD, 54 cases of CKD progression, 269 CV events, and 459 deaths. Each 2-fold higher concentration of preoperative Uα1m was independently associated with AKI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.14–1.62), CKD progression (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.46, 1.04–2.05), and all-cause mortality (aHR = 1.19, 1.06–1.33) but not with incident CKD (aHR = 1.21, 0.96–1.51) or CV events (aHR = 1.01, 0.86–1.19). Postoperative Uα1m was not associated with AKI (aOR per 2-fold higher = 1.07, 0.93–1.22), CKD incidence (aHR = 0.90, 0.79–1.03) or progression (aHR = 0.79, 0.56–1.11), CV events (aHR = 1.06, 0.94–1.19), and mortality (aHR = 1.01, 0.92–1.11).

Conclusion

Preoperative Uα1m concentrations may identify patients at high risk of AKI and other adverse events after cardiac surgery, but postoperative Uα1m concentrations do not appear to be informative.

Keywords: Acute kidney injury, Chronic kidney disease, Mortality, Biomarker, Alpha-1-microglobulin, Cardiac surgery

Introduction

Kidney tubules are vital for fluid and electrolyte balance, neurohormonal regulation, and mineral metabolism, and kidney tubule injury can lead to severe kidney dysfunction and chronic kidney disease (CKD) [1, 2]. However, current clinical practice lacks tools to monitor kidney tubule health directly, and serum creatinine remains the dominant biomarker for the assessment of kidney function and diagnosis of kidney injury. Creatinine reflects glomerular clearance but not kidney tubule injury or dysfunction, making it ill-suited for timely recognition of many forms of acute kidney injury (AKI), particularly those due to kidney tubule damage [3, 4, 5]. Because AKI is responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality and also portends important long-term outcomes, including risk of subsequent CKD [6, 7], cardiovascular (CV) disease [8, 9, 10], and mortality [11, 12], there is an impetus to identify biomarkers of kidney tubule injury and dysfunction that could improve AKI risk assessment and early diagnosis. Furthermore, several of these kidney tubule health biomarkers have been shown to predict long-term kidney, CV, and mortality outcomes in multiple populations and may add an important dimension to the assessment of kidney health [13, 14, 15, 16, 17].

One promising biomarker is alpha-1-microglobulin (α1m), a low molecular weight protein synthesized by hepatocytes, freely filtered across the glomerulus, and then avidly reabsorbed by the proximal tubule [18, 19]. Because the concentration of urine α1m (Uα1m) is inversely proportional to proximal tubule resorptive capacity, it can signal proximal tubule dysfunction: higher Uα1m concentrations indicate impaired tubular reabsorption [20]. Small studies have previously shown that Uα1m concentrations increase in AKI, reflect severity of AKI, and are associated with the need for dialysis after nonoliguric AKI [21, 22, 23]. Elevated Uα1m correlates with interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy on kidney biopsy, representing chronic kidney damage [24]. Furthermore, Uα1m appears to predict kidney function decline and CKD progression [25, 26], AKI risk [27], CV events [28], and mortality [16, 28, 29].

To better define its diagnostic and prognostic utility, we investigated Uα1m in a multicenter prospective cohort of adults at high risk for AKI who underwent cardiac surgery as part of the Translational Research Investigating Biomarker Endpoints for Acute Kidney Injury (TRIBE-AKI) study. Specifically, we measured preoperative and postoperative Uα1m concentrations and evaluated their associations with postoperative AKI, CKD incidence and progression, CV events, and all-cause mortality after discharge. We hypothesized that higher pre- and postoperative levels of Uα1m would be associated with adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery.

Methods

Study Design and Participants

TRIBE-AKI is a prospective, multicenter cohort study of adults who underwent cardiac surgery at 6 North American academic medical centers. Overall study design and cohort selection have been presented in detail previously [13, 14, 30]. Between July 2007 and December 2010, 1,601 adults at high risk for AKI who were undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and/or valve surgery were enrolled after informed consent. Risk of AKI was determined by the presence of one of the following characteristics: emergency surgery, preoperative serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, ejection fraction <35% or grade 3 or 4 left ventricular dysfunction, age >70 years, diabetes mellitus, concomitant CABG and valve surgery, or repeat revascularization. Patients undergoing multiple surgeries were enrolled in the study only once. Society of Thoracic Surgeon definitions were used for collection of preoperative characteristics, surgical characteristics, and postoperative complications [31]. To establish baseline kidney function, all participants had to have a documented value for serum creatinine within 2 months before surgery. This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki, was approved by the institutional review board at each site, and all participants provided written informed consent.

Sample Collection and Biomarker Measurement

Sample collection and processing methods have been previously described in detail [13, 14]. Briefly, urine and blood samples were collected preoperatively and then daily for up to 5 days after surgery. The postoperative samples used in this analysis were collected during the first 12 h of postoperative day 1. All postoperative urine samples were collected before any form of dialysis was initiated. Fresh urine samples were obtained from the urimeter from participants with Foley catheters. Urine samples were centrifuged to separate cellular debris. Urine supernatant and plasma were stored at −80°C, until thawed for biomarker measurement. Uα1m was measured at the Kidney Health Research Collaborative laboratory based at the San Francisco VA Health Care System (San Francisco, CA) by immunonephelometry on the Siemens BNII instrument using the proprietary N α1-Microglobulin Reagent Kit (Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Malvern, PA) with a lower limit of detection (LLD) at 5.4625 mg/L. Intra-assay coefficients of variation were not calculated because samples were run in a singlicate. A control sample provided by the manufacturer was run before batches of measurements to ensure validity of the assay. Values below the LLD were imputed as 5.4625 mg/L and included in the lowest tertile for categorical analyses.

Outcomes

Outcomes were defined and ascertained as they had been from the previous studies in the TRIBE-AKI cohort [30, 32, 33, 34]. AKI during index hospitalization was categorized as “at least mild AKI” defined as a serum creatinine increase ≥50% or 0.3 mg/dL from the preoperative level, and “severe AKI” defined as at least doubling of serum creatinine or need for dialysis during the index hospitalization [35].

Long-term outcomes among individuals who survived the index hospitalization were ascertained through patient phone calls, hospital records review (US sites), National Death Index search (US sites), and ICES data (Canadian site). CV events were defined as major adverse CV events: hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, coronary bypass, and percutaneous coronary intervention. We identified CV events using administrative codes [36]. For US participants, CV events were obtained through linkages with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services databases. For Canadian participants, information was obtained from data held at ICES, linked using unique encoded identifiers, and analyzed at ICES.

CKD incidence and progression outcomes were available in participants from 2 study sites (Ontario, Yale). Follow-up serum creatinine values were obtained using the Ontario Laboratories Information System for Canadian participants and the Yale Joint Data Analytics Team's HELIX data repository for participants enrolled at Yale. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration Equation [37]. For participants with preoperative eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2, CKD incidence was defined as a 25% reduction in eGFR and a fall below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. In participants with preoperative eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, CKD progression was defined as a 50% reduction in eGFR or a fall below 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 [30, 38, 39].

Statistical Analyses

Descriptive statistics were reported using mean (standard deviation, SD) or median (interquartile range [IQR]) for continuous variables and frequency (percentage) for categorical variables. We compared continuous variables using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and categorical variables using the χ2 test. Uα1m was modeled continuously (after log2-transformation to represent per 2-fold higher levels) and categorically as tertiles. Logistic regression models were used to explore associations of (1) preoperative Uα1m, (2) postoperative Uα1m, and (3) relative change from pre-to postoperative Uα1m levels with postoperative AKI. These models were adjusted for age, sex, race, preoperative comorbidities abstracted from chart review (diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, and myocardial infarction), baseline eGFR, urine albumin, and urine creatinine at corresponding time point, cardiopulmonary bypass time >120 min (omitted from models of preoperative Uα1m), nonelective surgery, CABG versus valve replacement, and study site.

We used Cox proportional hazards regression to model the associations of (1) preoperative Uα1m, (2) postoperative Uα1m, and (3) relative change from pre- to postoperative Uα1m levels with longitudinal outcomes after discharge, including CKD incidence, CKD progression, CV events, and all-cause mortality. Kolmogorov-type supremum tests were used to evaluate proportional hazards assumptions for all models. Models of CKD incidence and progression after discharge were adjusted for the variables listed above in the AKI model except for the addition of AKI or dialysis during index hospitalization and the exclusion of myocardial infarction history and surgery type (CABG vs. valve replacement). Models for CV events and all-cause mortality were also adjusted for similar variables as noted in the AKI model except for the addition of baseline smoking history, baseline BMI, and AKI or dialysis during index hospitalization, the exclusion of surgery type.

All tests of statistical significance were two-sided, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. To investigate effect modification by heart failure, we tested for interactions between heart failure status with CV events and all-cause mortality. Analyses were performed in SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

The size of the analytic cohort differed by outcome (Tables 2, 3, 4). In the 1,464 participants with preoperative Uα1m measurements, mean age was 72 years, 69% were male, and 94% were White (Table 1). Surgery was nonelective in 17% and consisted of CABG alone in 49% of participants. The preoperative Uα1m level was below LLD in nearly 35% of participants. By tertile of preoperative Uα1m, there were 507 participants in tertile 1 (all of whom had levels below LLD), 469 participants in tertile 2, and 488 participants in tertile 3. In the highest Uα1m tertile compared to the lowest, participants were older (73 vs. 70 years), more likely to be male (76 vs. 62%), and had a higher prevalence of CKD, diabetes, hypertension, and heart failure.

Table 2.

Association of preoperative Uα1m levels and risk of inhospital AKI and longitudinal adverse outcomes following hospital discharge in the TRIBE-AKI cohort

AKIa (n = 1,464) All-cause mortalityb (n = 1,449) CKD incidencec (n = 602) CKD progressionc (n = 262) CV eventsb (n = 1,449)
Events, n (%) 230 (16) 459 (32) 212 (35) 54 (21) 269 (19)
Preoperative Uα1m aOR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI)
Per 2-fold higher 1.34 (1.13, 1.60) 1.18 (1.06, 1.33) 1.20 (0.96, 1.50) 1.46 (1.04, 2.04) 1.02 (0.87, 1.19)
Tertile 1 (0–5.46 mg/L) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
Tertile 2 (5.47–10.61 mg/L) 0.64 (0.43, 0.95) 0.93 (0.71, 1.22) 1.36 (0.98, 1.88) 0.72 (0.30, 1.74) 0.83 (0.60, 1.14)
Tertile 3 (10.63–285.02 mg/L) 1.14 (0.76, 1.69) 1.40 (1.06, 1.83) 1.30 (0.85, 2.00) 1.47 (0.64, 3.37) 1.02 (0.73, 1.44)

Uα1m ranges, tertile 1: 0–5.46 mg/L; tertile 2: 5.47–10.61 mg/L; and tertile 3: 10.63–285.02 mg/L. Uα1m, urine alpha-1-microglobulin; AKI, acute kidney injury; TRIBE-AKI, Translational Research Investigating Biomarker Endpoints for Acute Kidney Injury; CKD, chronic kidney disease; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a

Adjusted for age, sex, race, nonelective surgery, CABG versus valve replacement, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, baseline eGFR, urine albumin, urine creatinine, and site.

b

Adjusted for age, sex, race, nonelective surgery, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, smoking, BMI, AKI/dialysis during index hospitalization, baseline eGFR, urine albumin, urine creatinine, and site.

c

Adjusted for age, sex, race, nonelective surgery, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, AKI/dialysis during index hospitalization, baseline eGFR, urine albumin, urine creatinine, and site.

Table 3.

Association of postoperative Uα1m levels and risk of inhospital AKI and longitudinal adverse outcomes following hospital discharge in the TRIBE-AKI cohort

AKIa (n = 1,445) All-cause mortalityb (n = 1,430) CKD incidencec (n = 598) CKD progressionc (n = 258) CV eventsb (n = 1,430)
Events, n (%) 226 (16) 450 (31) 210 (35) 53 (21) 262 (18)

Postoperative Uα1m aOR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI)

Per 2-fold higher Tertile 1 (5.46–8.05 mg/L) 1.07 (0.93, 1.22) 1.00 (reference) 1.01 (0.92, 1.11) 1.00 (reference) 0.90 (0.79, 1.03) 1.00 (reference) 0.79 (0.56, 1.11) 1.00 (reference) 1.06 (0.94, 1.19) 1.00 (reference)
Tertile 2 (8.06–23.03 mg/L) 0.75 (0.47, 1.17) 0.97 (0.73, 1.30) 1.02 (0.66, 1.57) 2.16 (0.93, 5.05) 1.55 (1.05, 2.27)
Tertile 3 (23.20–651.36 mg/L) 0.98 (0.61, 1.58) 1.14 (0.83, 1.59) 0.84 (0.52, 1.38) 0.74 (0.22, 2.45) 1.56 (1.01, 2.39)

Postoperative samples collected on postoperative day 1. Uα1m, urine alpha-1-microglobulin; AKI, acute kidney injury; TRIBE-AKI, Translational Research Investigating Biomarker Endpoints for Acute Kidney Injury; CKD, chronic kidney disease; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a

Adjusted for age, sex, race, cardiopulmonary bypass time >120 min, nonelective surgery, CABG versus valve replacement, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, baseline eGFR, urine albumin, urine creatinine, and site.

b

Adjusted for age, sex, race, cardiopulmonary bypass time >120 min, nonelective surgery, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, smoking, BMI, AKI/dialysis during index hospitalization, baseline eGFR, urine albumin, urine creatinine, and site.

c

Adjusted for age, sex, race, cardiopulmonary bypass time >120 min, nonelective surgery, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, AKI/dialysis during index hospitalization, baseline eGFR, urine albumin, urine creatinine, and site.

Table 4.

Association of per 100% change in preoperative to postoperative day 1 Uα1m levels and risk of inhospital AKI and longitudinal adverse outcomes following hospital discharge in the TRIBE-AKI cohort

AKIa (n = 1,444) All-cause mortalityb (n = 1,429) CKD incidencec (n = 598) CKD progressionc (n = 258) CV eventsb (n = 1,429)
Events, n (%) 226 (16) 450 (31) 210 (35) 53 (21) 262 (18)

Change in Uα1m aOR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI) aHR (95% CI)

per 100% change 1.00 (0.97, 1.02) 0.98 (0.96, 1.00) 0.98 (0.95, 1.01) 0.79 (0.65, 0.97) 0.99 (0.97, 1.02)
Tertile 1 (−96.9% to 0.0%) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
Tertile 2 (0.0–152.9%) 0.74 (0.49, 1.11) 0.83 (0.65, 1.06) 0.62 (0.42, 0.94) 0.55 (0.26, 1.17) 1.02 (0.73, 1.43)
Tertile 3 (154.1–840.7%) 0.95 (0.61, 1.47) 0.78 (0.58, 1.04) 0.69 (0.43, 1.09) 0.32 (0.11, 0.92) 1.03 (0.70, 1.50)

Uα1m, urine alpha-1-microglobulin; AKI, acute kidney injury; TRIBE-AKI, Translational Research Investigating Biomarker Endpoints for Acute Kidney Injury; CKD, chronic kidney disease; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

a

Adjusted for age, sex, race, cardiopulmonary bypass time >120 min, nonelective surgery, CABG versus valve replacement, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, baseline eGFR, urine albumin, urine creatinine, and site.

b

Adjusted for age, sex, race, cardiopulmonary bypass time >120 min, nonelective surgery, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, smoking, BMI, AKI/dialysis during index hospitalization, baseline eGFR, urine albumin, urine creatinine, and site.

c

Adjusted for age, sex, race, cardiopulmonary bypass time >120 min, nonelective surgery, diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, AKI/dialysis during index hospitalization, baseline eGFR, urine albumin, urine creatinine, and site.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study population overall and by tertile of preoperative Uα1m

All Tertile 1 Tertile 2 Tertile 3
Characteristic n = 1,464 n = 507 n = 469 n = 488
Mean age at time of surgery, years 72 (10) 70 (10) 72 (10) 73 (9)
White race, n (%) 1,380 (94) 479 (94) 442 (94) 459 (94)
Male sex, n (%) 1,009 (69) 316 (62) 321 (68) 372 (76)
Diabetes, n (%) 565 (39) 192 (38) 173 (37) 200 (41)
Hypertension, n (%) 1,167 (80) 401 (79) 362 (77) 404 (83)
EF <35% or grade 3 or 4 LV dysfunction, n (%) 147 (10) 52 (10) 44 (9) 51 (10)
Myocardial infarction, n (%) 369 (25) 139 (27) 112 (24) 118 (24)
Congestive heart failure, n (%) 337 (23) 108 (21) 93 (20) 136 (28)
Median preoperative serum creatinine, mg/dL 1.00 (0.90, 1.20) 0.97 (0.80, 1.10) 1.00 (0.90, 1.20) 1.10 (0.90, 1.38)
Median preoperative eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 69 (55, 83) 73 (61, 86) 69 (57, 83) 61 (48, 76)
eGFR ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2, n (%) 492 (34) 117 (23) 143 (30) 236 (48)
Median UACR, mg/g 15 (7, 46) 12 (6, 23) 14 (7, 45) 27 (10, 104)
Surgery type, n (%)
 CABG and valve 318 (22) 106 (21) 103 (22) 109 (22)
 CABG only 712 (49) 255 (50) 232 (49) 225 (46)
 Valve only 412 (28) 136 (27) 126 (27) 150 (31)
 Other 22 (2) 10 (2) 8 (2) 4 (1)
 Nonelective surgery 243 (17) 73 (14) 85 (18) 85 (17)

Uα1m ranges, tertile 1: 0–5.46 mg/L; tertile 2: 5.47–10.61 mg/L; and tertile 3: 10.63–285.02 mg/L. Values reported as mean (SD), n (%) or median (IQR). EF, ejection fraction; LV, left ventricular; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; UACR, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; Uα1m, urine alpha-1-microglobulin; IQR, interquartile range.

Preoperative Uα1m Levels and Postoperative Outcomes

There were 230 AKI events during the index hospitalization, among which 67 were stage 2 or 3. Analyzed continuously, each 2-fold higher level of Uα1m was associated with significantly increased odds of postoperative AKI (Table 2; Fig. 1). In the categorical analysis, the association between the highest tertile of preoperative Uα1m and postoperative AKI was attenuated and not statistically significant. In stratified analysis by diabetes status, there was evidence that Uα1m was more strongly associated with postoperative AKI among participants without diabetes compared to those with diabetes (online suppl. Table 1; for all online suppl. material, see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/00010.1159/000518240). In unadjusted analyses, there were statistically significant associations between preoperative Uα1m and stage 2 or 3 AKI (unadjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09–1.69), but these were no longer significant in the adjusted model (adjusted OR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.97–1.73).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Adjusted associations of preoperative Uα1m levels with risk of in-hospital AKI and longitudinal adverse outcomes following hospital discharge in the TRIBE-AKI cohort. Squares represent model-adjusted estimates of OR (for AKI) or HR (longitudinal outcomes) for each 2-fold higher preoperative U⍺1m concentration. Brackets represent 95% CIs. *For AKI, measure of association is aOR. OR, odds ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; U⍺1m, urine alpha-1-microglobulin; AKI, acute kidney injury; TRIBE-AKI, Translational Research Investigating Biomarker Endpoints for Acute Kidney Injury; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio.

There were 459 deaths over a median follow-up of 6.7 years (IQR 4.0, 7.9). Higher preoperative Uα1m levels were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality when analyzed continuously and categorically (Table 2; Fig. 2). The highest tertile of Uα1m was associated with a 40% higher risk of all-cause mortality compared to the lowest tertile. However, this association was modified by heart failure (Uα1m and heart failure interaction p = 0.009 for continuous analysis, p = 0.008 for categorical analysis). Among those without heart failure, preoperative Uα1m was strongly associated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.28, 95% CI 1.12–1.47), whereas the association was weaker among those with heart failure (aHR = 1.06, 95% CI 0.84–1.32). Categorical analyses yielded similar findings (online suppl. Table 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier curves depicting survival probability by tertile of preoperative Uα1m. U⍺1m, urine alpha-1-microglobulin.

There were 212 incident CKD diagnoses and 54 events of CKD progression over a median follow-up of 5.8 years (IQR 4.2, 7.1 years). There were no significant associations between preoperative Uα1m and CKD incidence (Table 2). However, there was a significant interaction on diabetes status, whereby preoperative Uα1m was associated with incident CKD among participants with diabetes (aHR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.30–2.31) but not among those without diabetes (aHR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.61–1.25; online suppl. Table 3). Higher preoperative Uα1m concentrations were associated with significantly greater risk of CKD progression when analyzed as a continuous predictor, though this association was not statistically significant when Uα1m was analyzed in tertiles (Table 2; Fig. 1).

There were 269 CV events over a median follow-up of 6.3 years (IQR 3.1, 7.7). Preoperative Uα1m levels were not associated with CV events in continuous or categorical analyses.

Postoperative Day 1 Uα1m Levels and Postoperative Outcomes

In the unadjusted analyses, postoperative day 1 Uα1m levels were associated with higher odds of AKI (OR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.16–1.41) and severe AKI (OR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.27–1.76), but these associations were attenuated and no longer significant after multivariable adjustment (Table 3; online suppl. Table 1). Postoperative Uα1m was not associated with CKD incidence or CKD progression. In contrast, higher postoperative Uα1m concentrations were associated with increased risk of CV events. Though the strength of this association was attenuated by multivariable adjustment, the categorical estimates remained significant and directionally consistent in the multivariable model (Table 3). Heart failure status did not modify the association of postoperative Uα1m with CV events. Postoperative Uα1m levels were not associated with all-cause mortality (Table 3).

Relative Changes from Preoperative to Postoperative Uα1m Levels and Postoperative Outcomes

The median (IQR) change from preoperative Uα1m level to postoperative day 1 Uα1m level was 43.9% (−12.2%, 256.9%) (Fig. 3a, b). Larger increases from preoperative to postoperative day 1 levels were associated with marginally increased risk of AKI, but these associations disappeared with adjustment (Table 4). Larger increases in Uα1m were not associated with CKD incidence but were associated with lower risk of CKD progression (for each 100% increase in Uα1m aHR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.65–0.97). Compared to the lowest tertile, the highest tertile of change in Uα1m levels was also associated with decreased risk of CKD progression (aHR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.11–0.92; Table 4). There were no significant associations between the percent change of Uα1m and CV events. Associations between changes in Uα1m and all-cause mortality were marginal and attenuated with adjustment (Table 4).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a Frequency distribution of preoperative Uα1m (red line) and postoperative Uα1m (blue line) concentrations in mg/L. U⍺1m, urine alpha-1-microglobulin. b Histogram of relative (%) change from preoperative to postoperative Uα1m concentration. U⍺1m, urine alpha-1-microglobulin.

Discussion

In this large, well-described cohort of high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery, we found that higher preoperative Uα1m levels were significantly associated with increased risk of AKI during index hospitalization as well as with CKD progression and all-cause mortality. Postoperative Uα1m levels and the relative change between pre- and postoperative Uα1m were not strongly associated with post-discharge outcomes. Our findings underscore the potential value of Uα1m as an ambulatory marker of tubular function that can risk-stratify as well as prognosticate kidney and nonkidney outcomes but did not support the use of Uα1m as an early indicator of inhospital AKI.

Uα1m levels reflect proximal tubule dysfunction and have been reported to increase in AKI and to correlate with pathologic changes of CKD, making Uα1m an attractive surrogate for kidney damage [18, 22, 24]. However, the finding that preoperative Uα1m was more consistently and strongly associated with AKI, CKD, and death compared with postoperative Uα1m was unexpected. Perhaps due to the unique kinetics of α1m, preoperative (baseline) and immediate postoperative (stressed) levels appear to represent distinct physiologies and should be interpreted differently based on our findings. Because α1m is filtered across the glomerulus, it is susceptible to hemodynamic variation during and after cardiac surgery and may be unreliable in the early postoperative period compared to the steady state preoperative levels. Though postoperative levels of Uα1m increased in most participants, some of these elevations may have quickly declined as normal tubular function was restored, but we measured Uα1m only on the first postoperative day and thus could not observe normalization. Transient elevations Uα1m might not capture clinically important AKI in contrast to the tubule injury markers that we have previously studied in this cohort, such as IL-18 and KIM-1, in which the median levels rise approximately 10-fold in AKI cases compared to noncases [13, 40, 41, 42]. In contrast, Uα1m may be most informative of underlying kidney health when measured in the absence of acute stressors.

Our finding that higher preoperative Uα1m was associated with 36% higher odds of postoperative AKI is consistent with previously published estimates. Among ambulatory SPRINT trial participants with CKD, each 2-fold higher baseline Uα1m level was associated with 20% higher risk of subsequent inhospital AKI, independent of baseline eGFR, albuminuria, and other kidney tubule biomarkers [27]. Likewise, higher Uα1m appears to portend worsening kidney function. We found that higher baseline Uα1m levels indicated a significantly greater risk of CKD progression in participants with prevalent CKD and demonstrated a directionally consistent, though nonsignificant, association with incident CKD. These results agree with findings from ambulatory settings in which Uα1m predicted faster kidney function decline in healthy and chronically ill populations [25, 26]. Furthermore, we found some evidence that the association between preoperative Uα1m levels and kidney outcomes might differ depending on baseline diabetes status, which warrants investigation in future studies. In sum, the results of our analysis, in addition to those from prior studies, suggest that baseline Uα1m levels might indicate the kidney's susceptibility to insults and risk of functional decline independent of baseline eGFR and albuminuria.

Unexpectedly, larger Uα1m elevations in the immediate postoperative period were associated with significantly lower risk of CKD progression among participants with prevalent CKD. However, we did not find significant associations between postoperative Uα1m levels alone and AKI or CKD incidence; rather, this association was observed when we analyzed the relative changes in the Uα1m level from before to after surgery. Few studies have evaluated associations of changes in Uα1m with subsequent CKD risk. One recent study in ambulatory HIV-infected women observed that rising Uα1m concentrations were associated with higher risk of incident CKD [43]. Additionally, among SPRINT trial participants assigned to the usual care arm, rising Uα1m concentrations were associated with incident CKD, whereas declining Uα1m concentrations were associated with incident CKD in the intensive antihypertensive therapy arm [44]. These findings suggest that changes in Uα1m may disclose risk of CKD, but also that Uα1m concentrations are susceptible to hemodynamic changes. This issue may be particularly relevant to the period immediately after cardiac surgery. The degree of perioperative change may be further confounded by underlying kidney health, as demonstrated by a study comparing Uα1m levels before and after cardiac surgery between individuals with creatinine clearances above and below 60 mL/min [21]. In this study, the relative change from preoperative to postoperative levels was greater among those with creatinine clearance >60 mL/min [21]. Thus, it is conceivable that larger relative increases in Uα1m levels after surgery are an indicator of individuals with healthier kidneys before surgery. Acute variations in Uα1m warrant further exploration to clarify their potential significance.

Higher preoperative Uα1m levels in this cohort were independently associated with all-cause mortality, which is consistent with findings across a variety of populations. In kidney transplant recipients, Uα1m was associated with a 51% increased risk of death per 2-fold higher level [45]. Among 2,948 Framingham Heart Study participants, each standard deviation increase of log-transformed Uα1m was associated with 26% higher risk of all-cause mortality [29]. In a case-cohort study of ambulatory older adults, each 2-fold higher baseline Uα1m was associated with a 1.29-fold greater risk of all-cause mortality over a median follow-up of 12 years [16]. Similarly, Garimella et al. [28] demonstrated that each 2-fold higher Uα1m level was associated with a 25% increase in the adjusted hazard of all-cause mortality among patients with CKD and hypertension.

The association of Uα1m with mortality risk in this study was much stronger in participants without heart failure than in those with heart failure. The physiology of Uα1m may render it less reliable in patients with heart failure. Heart failure can cause neurohormonally mediated reductions in GFR [46], which could decrease the amount of α1m filtered into the tubule and ultimately excreted in urine irrespective of reabsorption − in essence, mimicking intact reabsorption. However, this was unlikely to be the case in the TRIBE-AKI cohort, given that participants with baseline heart failure were more likely to be in the highest tertile of preoperative Uα1m. Alternatively, mortality risk in individuals with heart failure may be influenced by pathways that are less related to kidney tubule dysfunction [36].

Previously reported associations between Uα1m and heart disease have been inconsistent, and we found only weak evidence for an association between Uα1m and CV events in this cohort. Similarly, the aforementioned analysis from the Framingham Heart Study found no association between Uα1m and CV events despite a strong association with mortality [29]. Jotwani et al. [16] found that higher baseline Uα1m was associated with significantly higher risk of CV events but not incident heart failure in older adults. Similarly, Park et al. [45] found that higher Uα1m was associated with CV events in kidney transplant recipients. Among TRIBE-AKI participants, those with severe postoperative AKI were more likely to experience CV events or death during a median 3.8 years of follow-up; however, only postoperative cardiac biomarkers − not kidney injury biomarkers − were associated with this outcome, suggesting against an independent kidney pathway in this relationship [36].

Though this study benefited from a well-characterized, large, multicenter cohort, its observational design is susceptible to residual confounding despite comprehensive multivariable adjustment. TRIBE-AKI did not record information on the severity and control of some comorbidities that could conceivably obfuscate the association between Uα1m and postoperative outcomes. However, we presume that comorbidities were perioperatively optimized for elective surgeries, which comprised the majority (83%) of procedures. Furthermore, only 10% of participants had severe heart failure at baseline as defined by left ventricular ejection fraction <35% or grade 3 or 4 left ventricular dysfunction. The unique clinical characteristics of the participants limit generalizability, particularly to populations with lower burdens of CVD and lower risk of AKI. Furthermore, the sample was overwhelmingly White and male, highlighting the need for future studies to include participants more representative of the general population. Postoperative Uα1m levels were available only from the first postoperative day, so it is unknown whether or not Uα1m fluctuations later in the hospitalization would be informative for kidney and CV prognosis. In spite of these limitations, the validity of our findings is supported by their consistency with results from studies of Uα1m in other populations.

In conclusion, preoperative Uα1m was independently associated with postoperative AKI, CKD progression, and all-cause mortality in this cohort of adults undergoing cardiac surgery. Contrary to our a priori hypothesis, associations of postoperative Uα1m or changes in pre- to postoperative Uα1m concentrations with these outcomes were weak and inconsistent. These results contribute to growing evidence that Uα1m levels have important associations with adverse outcomes and suggest that kidney tubule dysfunction is an important risk factor for kidney disease and mortality. Future studies should better characterize short-, medium-, and long-term variations in Uα1m levels and investigate whether these associations generalize to more diverse populations.

Statement of Ethics

This study was performed in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board at each study site. All study participants provided written informed consent.

Conflict of Interest Statement

C.R.P. serves on the advisory boards of Renalytix AI, LLC, and GENFIT Pharmaceuticals. M.M.E. and M.G.S. have received funding from Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. M.G.S. discloses consulting income from Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Cricket Health. The remaining authors did not declare relevant financial interests.

Funding Sources

J.G.A. is supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award No. F32DK126381. CRP is supported by NIH Grants under Award No. R01HL085757, U01DK082185, and the P30DK079310 O'Brien Kidney Center Grant.

Author Contributions

J.G.A., M.M.E., C.R.P., and M.G.S. contributed to research question and study design; C.R.P., A.X.G., and M.G.S. contributed to data acquisition; J.G.A., M.M.E., A.X.G., S.G.C., H.T.P., E.M., C.R.P., and M.G.S. contributed to data analysis and interpretation; H.T.P. and E.M. contributed to statistical analysis; M.M.E., C.R.P., and M.G.S. contributed to supervision and mentorship. Each author contributed to important intellectual content during manuscript drafting and revision.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants but are available from the corresponding author (M.G.S.) upon reasonable request.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary data

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC). The opinions, results, and conclusions reported in this article are those of the authors and are independent from the funding sources. No endorsement by ICES or the Ontario MOHLTC is intended or should be inferred. Parts of this material are based on data and/or information compiled and provided by CIHI. However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions, and statements expressed in the material are those of the authors and not necessarily those of CIHI.

verified

References

  • 1.Liu BC, Tang TT, Lv LL, Lan HY. Renal tubule injury: a driving force toward chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2018 Mar;93((3)):568–79. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.09.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yu AS, Chertow GM, Luyckx VA, Marsden PA, Skorecki K, Taal MW, editors. Brenner & Rector's the kidney. 11th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rule AD, Amer H, Cornell LD, Taler SJ, Cosio FG, Kremers WK, et al. The association between age and nephrosclerosis on renal biopsy among healthy adults. Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 4;152((9)):561–7. doi: 10.1059/0003-4819-152-9-201005040-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thiele RH, Isbell JM, Rosner MH. AKI associated with cardiac surgery. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Mar 6;10((3)):500–14. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07830814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Molitoris BA. Beyond biomarkers: machine learning in diagnosing acute kidney injury. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Mar;94((5)):748–50. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.He L, Wei Q, Liu J, Yi M, Liu Y, Liu H, et al. AKI on CKD: heightened injury, suppressed repair, and the underlying mechanisms. Kidney Int. 2017 Nov;92((5)):1071–83. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.06.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Levey AS, James MT. Acute kidney injury. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Nov 7;167((9)):ITC66–80. doi: 10.7326/AITC201711070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC, Coresh J, Culleton B, Hamm LL, et al. Kidney disease as a risk factor for development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation. 2003 Nov;108((17)):2154–69. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095676.90936.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Coresh J, Astor B, Sarnak MJ. Evidence for increased cardiovascular disease risk in patients with chronic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2004 Jan;13((1)):73–81. doi: 10.1097/00041552-200401000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Odutayo A, Wong CX, Farkouh M, Altman DG, Hopewell S, Emdin CA, et al. AKI and long-term risk for cardiovascular events and mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jan;28((1)):377–87. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016010105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 23;351((13)):1296–305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa041031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Coca SG, Yusuf B, Shlipak MG, Garg AX, Parikh CR. Long-term risk of mortality and other adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Jun;53((6)):961–73. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Parikh CR, Coca SG, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Shlipak MG, Koyner JL, Wang Z, et al. Postoperative biomarkers predict acute kidney injury and poor outcomes after adult cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Sep;22((9)):1748–57. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010121302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Parikh CR, Devarajan P, Zappitelli M, Sint K, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Li S, et al. Postoperative biomarkers predict acute kidney injury and poor outcomes after pediatric cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Sep;22((9)):1737–47. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010111163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Peralta CA, Katz R, Bonventre JV, Sabbisetti V, Siscovick D, Sarnak M, et al. Associations of urinary levels of kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) with kidney function decline in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA) Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Dec;60((6)):904–11. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jotwani V, Katz R, Ix JH, Gutiérrez OM, Bennett M, Parikh CR, et al. Urinary biomarkers of kidney tubular damage and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in elders. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Aug;72((2)):205–13. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Malhotra R, Craven T, Ambrosius WT, Killeen AA, Haley WE, Cheung AK, et al. Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on kidney tubule injury in CKD: a longitudinal subgroup analysis in SPRINT. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Jan;73((1)):21–30. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.07.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Itoh Y, Kawai T. Human alpha 1-microglobulin: its measurement and clinical significance. J Clin Lab Anal. 1990;4((5)):376–84. doi: 10.1002/jcla.1860040511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Weber MH, Verwiebe R. Alpha 1-microglobulin (protein HC): features of a promising indicator of proximal tubular dysfunction. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1992 Oct;30((10)):683–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Penders J, Delanghe JR. Alpha 1-microglobulin: clinical laboratory aspects and applications. Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Aug 16;346((2)):107–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dehne MG, Boldt J, Heise D, Sablotzki A, Hempelmann G. [Tamm-Horsfall protein, alpha-1- and beta-2-microglobulin as kidney function markers in heart surgery] Anaesthesist. 1995 Aug;44((8)):545–51. doi: 10.1007/s001010050187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Edelstein CL, Faubel S. Biomarkers in kidney disease. Amsterdam: Elsevier Press; 2011. Biomarkers in acute kidney injury; pp. p. 177–232. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Heise D, Rentsch K, Braeuer A, Friedrich M, Quintel M. Comparison of urinary neutrophil glucosaminidase-associated lipocalin, cystatin C, and α1-microglobulin for early detection of acute renal injury after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jan;39((1)):38–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.05.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Amer H, Lieske JC, Rule AD, Kremers WK, Larson TS, Franco Palacios CR, et al. Urine high and low molecular weight proteins one-year post-kidney transplant: relationship to histology and graft survival. Am J Transplant. 2013 Mar;13((3)):676–84. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jotwani V, Scherzer R, Abraham A, Estrella MM, Bennett M, Cohen MH, et al. Association of urine α1-microglobulin with kidney function decline and mortality in HIV-infected women. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jan 7;10((1)):63–73. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03220314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ascher SB, Scherzer R, Estrella MM, Shlipak MG, Ng DK, Palella FJ, et al. Associations of urine biomarkers with kidney function decline in HIV-infected and uninfected men. Am J Nephrol. 2019 Sep 25;50:401–10. doi: 10.1159/000502898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bullen AL, Katz R, Lee AK, Anderson CAM, Cheung AK, Garimella PS, et al. The SPRINT trial suggests that markers of tubule cell function in the urine associate with risk of subsequent acute kidney injury while injury markers elevate after the injury. Kidney Int. 2019 May;96((2)):470–9. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Garimella PS, Lee AK, Ambrosius WT, Bhatt U, Cheung AK, Chonchol M, et al. Markers of kidney tubule function and risk of cardiovascular disease events and mortality in the SPRINT trial. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 30;40((42)):3486–93. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.O'Seaghdha CM, Hwang SJ, Larson MG, Meigs JB, Vasan RS, Fox CS. Analysis of a urinary biomarker panel for incident kidney disease and clinical outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Nov;24((11)):1880–8. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013010019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Menez S, Moledina DG, Garg AX, Thiessen-Philbrook H, McArthur E, Jia Y, et al. Results from the TRIBE-AKI Study found associations between post-operative blood biomarkers and risk of chronic kidney disease after cardiac surgery. Kidney Int. 2020 Jul 25;99((3)):716–24. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.06.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fernandez FG, Falcoz PE, Kozower BD, Salati M, Wright CD, Brunelli A. The society of thoracic surgeons and the European society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic surgery databases: joint standardization of variable definitions and terminology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jan;99((1)):368–76. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Coca SG, Garg AX, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Koyner JL, Patel UD, Krumholz HM, et al. Urinary biomarkers of AKI and mortality 3 years after cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 May;25((5)):1063–71. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013070742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mansour SG, Zhang WR, Moledina DG, Coca SG, Jia Y, Thiessen-Philbrook H, et al. The association of angiogenesis markers with acute kidney injury and mortality after cardiac surgery. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Jul;74((1)):36–46. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Patel DM, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Brown JR, McArthur E, Moledina DG, Mansour SG, et al. Association of plasma-soluble ST2 and galectin-3 with cardiovascular events and mortality following cardiac surgery. Am Heart J. 2020 Feb;220:253–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.11.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, Molitoris BA, Ronco C, Warnock DG, et al. Acute kidney injury network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2007;11:R31. doi: 10.1186/cc5713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Parikh CR, Puthumana J, Shlipak MG, Koyner JL, Thiessen-Philbrook H, McArthur E, et al. Relationship of kidney injury biomarkers with long-term cardiovascular outcomes after cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Dec;28((12)):3699–707. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017010055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, 3rd, Feldman HI, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150((9)):604–12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Go AS, Parikh CR, Ikizler TA, Coca S, Siew ED, Chinchilli VM, et al. The assessment, serial evaluation, and subsequent sequelae of acute kidney injury (ASSESS-AKI) study: design and methods. BMC Nephrol. 2010 Aug 27;11:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-11-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hsu CY, Chinchilli VM, Coca S, Devarajan P, Ghahramani N, Go AS, et al. Post-acute kidney injury proteinuria and subsequent kidney disease progression: the Assessment, Serial Evaluation, and Subsequent Sequelae in Acute Kidney Injury (ASSESS-AKI) Study. JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jan 27;180((3)):402–10. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.6390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Koyner JL, Garg AX, Coca SG, Sint K, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Patel UD, et al. Biomarkers predict progression of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 May;23((5)):905–14. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011090907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Parikh CR, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Garg AX, Kadiyala D, Shlipak MG, Koyner JL, et al. Performance of kidney injury molecule-1 and liver fatty acid-binding protein and combined biomarkers of AKI after cardiac surgery. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Jul;8((7)):1079–88. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10971012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Coca SG, Nadkarni GN, Garg AX, Koyner J, Thiessen-Philbrook H, McArthur E, et al. First Post-operative urinary kidney injury biomarkers and association with the duration of AKI in the TRIBE-AKI cohort. PLoS One. 2016;11((8)):e0161098. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ascher SB, Scherzer R, Estrella MM, Muiru AN, Jotwani VK, Grunfeld C, et al. Kidney tubule health scores and their associations with incident CKD in women living with HIV. HIV Med. 2021 Mar 9;22((7)):527–37. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhang WR, Craven TE, Malhotra R, Cheung AK, Chonchol M, Drawz P, et al. Kidney damage biomarkers and incident chronic kidney disease during blood pressure reduction: a case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Nov 6;169((9)):610–8. doi: 10.7326/M18-1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Park M, Katz R, Shlipak MG, Weiner D, Tracy R, Jotwani V, et al. Urinary markers of fibrosis and risk of cardiovascular events and death in kidney transplant recipients: the FAVORIT trial. Am J Transplant. 2017 Oct;17((10)):2640–9. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Verbrugge FH, Guazzi M, Testani JM, Borlaug BA. Altered hemodynamics and end-organ damage in heart failure: impact on the lung and kidney. Circulation. 2020 Sep 8;142((10)):998–1012. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants but are available from the corresponding author (M.G.S.) upon reasonable request.


Articles from American Journal of Nephrology are provided here courtesy of Karger Publishers

RESOURCES