Abstract
Stay-at-home orders have abruptly altered food purchasing behaviour, dietary habits, and food choice motives. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the trajectory of food choice motives and their associations with the weight status of Malaysian youths in the time of COVID-19. Socio-demographic information and anthropometric measurements were self-reported by the respondents, while the food choice motives were assessed using a validated 38-item food choice questionnaire (FCQ). Of the 1013 Malaysian youths, 48.6% gained weight due to the confinement, with an average weight gain of 3.90 ± 2.92 kg. On the other hand, 47.0% to 73.0% of the youths changed their food choice motives in the time of COVID-19. Of the 10 motives, convenience (48.5%) had the largest percentage increase, followed by weight control (47.0%) and health (45.3%). Moreover, the mean scores of health (t = −3.324, p = 0.001), convenience (t = −5.869, p < 0.001), weight control (t = −7.532, p < 0.001), natural content (t = −5.957, p < 0.001), ethical concern (t = −4.419, p < 0.001) and price (t = −3.737, p < 0.001) were significantly higher during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic. Findings from the multinomial regression model revealed that youths highly concerned for weight control were more likely to be in the weight loss category (Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.633, Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.230–2.168, p = 0.001). Conversely, those who gained weight due to the pandemic confinement highly valued natural content in foods (AOR = 0.653, CI = 0.481–0.886, p = 0.006) when making their food choices in this unprecedented pandemic. In conclusion, Malaysian youths made healthier food choices to mitigate the risk of COVID-19 infection.
Keywords: food choice motives, weight status, youths, COVID-19, lockdown
1. Introduction
In Malaysia, confirmed COVID-19 cases continue to rise despite the implementation of three nationwide lockdowns (commonly known as Movement Control Orders, MCOs). As of September 2021, more than 1.8 million Malaysians were infected by this highly contagious virus [1]. The reported cases have already accounted for approximately 5.5% of the 32.7 million population in Malaysia [2]. In line with the enforcement of MCOs, several stringent measures were taken by the Federal Government of Malaysian to curb the spread of COVID-19 in communities. Some of those preventive measures included the temporary closure of non-essential industries and learning institutions, only two in a family being permitted to go grocery shopping, and an imposed a travel limit of no more than 10 km radius from an individual’s residential address [3].
The stay-at-home orders abruptly altered food purchasing behaviour, dietary habits, and food choice motives [4,5,6]. A recent report released by the Department of Statistics Malaysia [7] indicated that the e-commerce income for the first quarter of 2021 surged 30% year-on-year. Alternatively, it could simply mean that the COVID-19 crisis increased e-commerce and digital marketing in Malaysia due to the fears of infection. The shift from physical store visits to online shopping for necessities, in addition to the enforcement of nationwide lockdowns, may have led to a change in Malaysians’ dietary habits and food choice motives. A study by Abdullah, Mersat, and Wong [8] stated that Malaysians reduced grocery trips to wet markets and supermarkets during the implementation of MCO as the result of travel restrictions. Limited access to wet markets during the lockdown appears to be the cause of the poor availability of fresh produce such as fruits, vegetables, fish, and flesh meats at the household level [9]. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is no prior study examining the food choice motives of Malaysians during COVID-19. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the trajectory of food choice motives and their associations with the weight status of Malaysian youths throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. Methodology
2.1. Study Design and Population
Data collection for this cross-sectional study was conducted from 4–11 June 2021 (during the re-enforcement of MCO) using a combination of convenience and snowball sampling approaches. Malaysian youths aged 18–30 from all ethnicities (Malay, Chinese, Indian, indigenous people of Sabah and Sarawak), with access to internet during the pandemic, and the ability to read English were included in this study. The current study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, in which ethical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of Management and Science University, Malaysia (Reference number: MSU-RMC-02/FR01/06/L1/040). A web-based anonymous self-administrated questionnaire was hosted on google forms and circulated to prospective respondents through social media platforms including WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok. Informed consent was obtained from the respondents before revealing the first survey question of this study. The sample size was computed based on Krejcie and Morgan [10], assuming a 5% margin of error, 99% confidence level, and 9 million Malaysian youths as of 2020 [11]. Thus, the minimum sample size required for this study was 663 respondents. A total of 1055 respondents answered this survey; however, findings in the current study were tabulated based on the responses from 1013 Malaysian youths, after excluding those who were not the correct age, provided duplicate responses, or were non-Malaysian.
2.2. Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Self-Reported Weight Trajectory
Socio-demographic information, including gender, age, ethnicity, and marital status was self-reported by the respondents. To determine their weight trajectory status during COVID-19, the respondents were instructed to recall body weight before the pandemic (kg) and measure their current body weight (kg) using a bathroom scale at home whenever possible. Weight trajectory was deemed the difference between current and pre-pandemic body weights [12]. All respondents were also required to report their body height (cm) for the estimation of body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2). The BMI was then stratified into 4 categories (underweight, normal, overweight, and obese) in accordance with the Asia-Pacific cut-off points [13].
2.3. Assessment of Food Choice Motives
Food choice motives before and during the pandemic were assessed with a validated 38-item food choice questionnaire (FCQ) [14]. This 38-item was further sorted into 10 factors: convenience (5-item), weight control (3-item), health (6-item), natural content (3-item), mood (6-item), ethical concern (3-item), price (3-item), familiarity (3-item), sensory appeal (4-item), and religion (2-item). Each item was rated with a 5-point Likert scale ranging from “not very important” (1 point) to “very important” (5 points). The respondents were required to answer two sets of FCQs, which were intended to assess their food choice motives before the pandemic (38-item) and the current food choice motives (food choice motives during the pandemic) (38-item). The mean score was calculated by averaging the total score to the number of items in a factor. Trajectory in the food choice motives (∆food choice motive) was reflected by the difference in the food choice motives before and during the pandemic.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Data analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS statistics 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and Cronbach’s alpha were used to measure the internal consistency and reliability of all items of the FCQ, respectively. Frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation (SD) were used to describe variables where appropriate. All continuous variables were considered as normally distributed if the skewness was ±2. Trajectories in the food choice motives and weight status before and during the COVID-19 pandemic were tested with a paired-samples t-test. To identify the food choice motives that contributed to weight trajectory during the pandemic, a univariate analysis (one-way ANOVA) was performed to determine the mean difference between groups (weight loss, sustained weight, and weight gain). Food choice motives (independent variables) which portrayed a p-value of less than 0.25 in one-way ANOVA analysis were further analysed with multinomial logistic regression (multivariable analysis) [15]. Multicollinearity was tested to ensure the independent variables included in the regression model did not violate the assumption. Findings of the multinomial regression were presented as adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). A p-value of less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) was statistically significant.
3. Results
Table 1 indicates the socio-demographic characteristics and weight status of the respondents. Of the 1013 respondents, the majority were female (64.4%), aged 18–24 (80.7%), Malay (59.4%), and with single marital status (94.8%). Emerging findings demonstrated that 48.6% of the youths gained weight due to the confinement, with an average weight gain of 3.90 ± 2.92 kg. Conversely, 36.5% of the youths declared a lighter body weight during the pandemic than pre-pandemic, with an average weight loss of 4.70 ± 3.99 kg. There was no significant difference in the BMI of the youths throughout the pandemic (pre-pandemic BMI: 22.72 ± 4.82 kg/m2 versus BMI during the pandemic: 22.78 ± 4.68 kg/m2) (t = −1.129, p = 0.259); however, a marginal increase in the prevalence of overweight/obesity was observed (pre-pandemic: 39.5% versus during the pandemic: 40.6%).
Table 1.
Socio-demographic characteristics and weight status of the respondents.
| Variable | Frequency, n (%) | Mean ± Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 361 (35.6) | - |
| Female | 652 (64.4) | |
| Age (years old) | ||
| 18–24 | 817 (80.7) | |
| 25–30 | 196 (19.3) | 22.65 ± 2.46 |
| Ethnicity | ||
| Malay Chinese Indian Others (Indigenous people of Sabah and Sarawak) |
602 (59.4) 164 (16.2) 226 (22.3) 21 (2.1) |
- |
| Marital Status | ||
| Single Married Divorced |
960 (94.8) 49 (4.8) 4 (0.4) |
- |
| Weight status (kg) | ||
| Sustained weight | 151 (14.9) | - |
| Weight loss Weight gain |
370 (36.5) 492 (48.6) |
−4.70 ± 3.99 3.90 ± 2.92 |
| BMI status (kg/m2) 1 | ||
| Before the pandemic | ||
| Underweight Normal Overweight Obese |
180 (17.8) 433 (42.7) 157 (15.5) 243 (24.0) |
22.72 ± 4.82 a |
| During the pandemic | ||
| Underweight Normal Overweight Obese |
158 (15.6) 444 (43.8) 160 (15.8) 251 (24.8) |
22.78 ± 4.68 a |
1 Mean difference was analysed with paired samples t-test. A different letter indicates significant difference at p < 0.05.
Table 2 demonstrates the internal consistency and reliability of all items of the FCQ. Since items with factor loading greater than 0.4 and Cronbach’s alpha above 0.7 are good representations of a factor [16], no item was discarded in the subsequent data analysis.
Table 2.
Factor loading and Cronbach’s alpha of food choice questionnaire.
| Food Choice Motives | Item | Before the Pandemic | During the Pandemic | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading | Cronbach’s Alpha | Loading | Cronbach’s Alpha | ||
| Health | Is high in fibre | 0.824 | 0.935 | 0.896 | 0.954 |
| Is nutritious | 0.884 | 0.923 | |||
| Contains a lot of vitamins and minerals | 0.895 | 0.913 | |||
| Is high in protein | 0.864 | 0.885 | |||
| Keeps me healthy | 0.882 | 0.915 | |||
| Is good for my skin/teeth/hair/nails, etc. | 0.863 | 0.875 | |||
| Convenience | Is easy to prepare | 0.750 | 0.858 | 0.829 | 0.916 |
| Is easily available in shops/supermarkets | 0.823 | 0.871 | |||
| Can be cooked very simply | 0.842 | 0.906 | |||
| Takes no time to prepare | 0.786 | 0.860 | |||
| Can be bought in shops close to where I live/work | 0.799 | 0.866 | |||
| Weight control | Is low in calories | 0.883 | 0.857 | 0.935 | 0.919 |
| Is low in fat | 0.898 | 0.938 | |||
| Helps me control my weight | 0.866 | 0.910 | |||
| Mood | Cheers me up | 0.804 | 0.917 | 0.885 | 0.946 |
| Helps me cope with stress | 0.881 | 0.904 | |||
| Keeps me awake | 0.759 | 0.819 | |||
| Helps me relax | 0.894 | 0.926 | |||
| Makes me feel good | 0.864 | 0.892 | |||
| Helps me cope with life | 0.854 | 0.903 | |||
| Natural content | Contains no additives | 0.855 | 0.833 | 0.914 | 0.905 |
| Contains natural ingredients | 0.875 | 0.918 | |||
| Contains no artificial ingredients | 0.868 | 0.919 | |||
| Familiarity | Is familiar | 0.821 | 0.784 | 0.868 | 0.852 |
| Is like the food I ate when I was a child | 0.813 | 0.879 | |||
| Is what I usually eat | 0.877 | 0.892 | |||
| Sensory appeal | Tastes good | 0.788 | 0.843 | 0.872 | 0.908 |
| Smells nice | 0.881 | 0.902 | |||
| Has a pleasant structure | 0.797 | 0.881 | |||
| Looks nice | 0.838 | 0.890 | |||
| Ethical concern | Is packaged in an environmentally friendly way | 0.849 | 0.820 | 0.873 | 0.863 |
| Comes from the country I approve of politically | 0.863 | 0.894 | |||
| Has the country of origin clearly marked | 0.862 | 0.893 | |||
| Price | Is not expensive | 0.900 | 0.842 | 0.926 | 0.897 |
| Is cheap | 0.911 | 0.932 | |||
| Is good value for money | 0.801 | 0.872 | |||
| Religion | Has certification from the government | 0.903 | 0.772 | 0.921 | 0.820 |
| Permissible by religion | 0.903 | 0.921 | |||
Table 3 shows the trajectory of food choice motives before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study revealed that 47.0% (religion) to 73.0% (health) of the youths changed their food choice motives due to the pandemic lockdown. Of the 10 motives, convenience (48.5%) had the largest percentage increase, followed by weight control (47.0%) and health (45.3%). Moreover, the mean scores of health (t = −3.324, p = 0.001), convenience (t = −5.869, p < 0.001), weight control (t = −7.532, p < 0.001), natural content (t = −5.957, p < 0.001), ethical concern (t = −4.419, p < 0.001), and price (t = −3.737, p < 0.001) were significantly higher during the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic. In addition, the food choice motives before and during the pandemic were also ranked by mean scores (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Before the COVID-19 pandemic, price (3.97 ± 0.88), sensory appeal (3.94 ± 0.82), and religion (3.90 ± 1.06) were the three top-rated food choice motives of Malaysian youths. After 15 months of the COVID-19 outbreak in Malaysia, price remained the motive with the highest mean score (4.06 ± 0.99), followed by convenience (4.01 ± 0.93), and sensory appeal (3.91 ± 0.94).
Table 3.
Trajectory of food choice motives before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
| Food Choice Motive | Before the COVID-19 (Mean ± SD) | During the COVID-19 (Mean ± SD) |
t-Value (p-Value 1) |
Trajectory of Food Choice Motive (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decreased | Sustained | Increased | ∆Food Choice Motive | ||||
| Health | 3.76 ± 0.90 | 3.85 ± 1.00 | −3.324 (0.001) * | 27.6 | 27.0 | 45.3 | 73.0 |
| Convenience | 3.87 ± 0.83 | 4.01 ± 0.93 | −5.869 (<0.001) * |
23.7 | 27.8 | 48.5 | 72.2 |
| Weight control | 3.46 ± 1.00 | 3.69 ± 1.10 | −7.532 (<0.001) * |
21.8 | 31.2 | 47.0 | 68.8 |
| Mood | 3.84 ± 0.88 | 3.88 ± 0.98 | −1.748 (0.081) | 27.5 | 31.9 | 40.6 | 68.1 |
| Natural content | 3.51 ± 0.95 | 3.66 ± 1.06 | −5.957 (<0.001) * |
22.8 | 33.1 | 44.1 | 66.9 |
| Familiarity | 3.52 ± 0.94 | 3.57 ± 1.04 | −1.938 (0.053) | 28.2 | 34.0 | 37.8 | 66.0 |
| Sensory appeal | 3.94 ± 0.82 | 3.91 ± 0.94 | 1.124 (0.263) | 32.3 | 34.7 | 33.0 | 65.3 |
| Ethical concern | 3.47 ± 1.02 | 3.58 ± 1.08 | −4.419 (<0.001) * |
24.7 | 35.1 | 40.2 | 64.9 |
| Price | 3.97 ± 0.88 | 4.06 ± 0.99 | −3.737 (<0.001) * |
23.2 | 38.1 | 38.7 | 61.9 |
| Religion | 3.90 ± 1.06 | 3.85 ± 1.16 | 1.918 (0.055) | 24.1 | 53.0 | 22.9 | 47.0 |
1 Mean difference was analysed with paired samples t-test. * Significant difference was considered at p < 0.05.
Figure 1.
Ranking of food choice motives before the COVID-19 pandemic.
Figure 2.
Ranking of food choice motives during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Table 4 depicts the mean difference in food choice motives before and during the pandemic by weight status. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the mean scores of all food choice motives by weight status before the pandemic outbreak in Malaysia. Paradoxically, the mean score of health (F = 6.505, p = 0.002), convenience (F = 5.405, p = 0.005), weight control (F = 9.384, p < 0.001), and mood (F = 3.479, p = 0.031) significantly differed by weight status during the COVID-19 pandemic. Food choice motives that portrayed a p-value of less than 0.25 (p < 0.25) in one-way ANOVA analysis were selected as the predictors for weight trajectory in multinomial regression. Thus, health, convenience, weight control, mood, natural content, sensory appeal, and price were included in the regression model (Table 5). Findings presented in the regression model confirmed that weight control and natural content were the significant predictors for weight trajectory during the pandemic lockdown. Youths who were highly concerned for weight control were more likely in the weight loss category (AOR = 1.633, CI = 1.230–2.168, p = 0.001). Conversely, those who gained weight due to the pandemic confinement highly valued natural content in foods (AOR = 0.653, CI = 0.481–0.886, p = 0.006) when making their food choices in this unprecedented pandemic.
Table 4.
Mean difference in food choice motives before and during the COVID-19 outbreak by weight status.
| Food Choice Motive | Before the COVID-19 | During the COVID-19 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight Status (F Value) 1 | p-Value 2 | Weight Status (F Value) 1 | p-Value 2 | |
| Health | 0.009 | 0.991 | 6.505 | 0.002 |
| Convenience | 0.872 | 0.419 | 5.405 | 0.005 |
| Weight control | 1.053 | 0.349 | 9.384 | <0.001 |
| Mood | 0.481 | 0.619 | 3.479 | 0.031 |
| Natural content | 0.325 | 0.723 | 2.746 | 0.065 |
| Familiarity | 0.844 | 0.430 | 1.042 | 0.353 |
| Sensory appeal | 0.542 | 0.582 | 2.611 | 0.074 |
| Ethical concern | 0.264 | 0.768 | 0.906 | 0.404 |
| Price | 0.626 | 0.535 | 2.759 | 0.064 |
| Religion | 0.144 | 0.866 | 0.605 | 0.547 |
1 Mean difference was tested with one-way ANOVA with Games–Howell post-hoc test. 2 Food choice motive that portrays a p-value of less than 0.25 (p < 0.25) was selected for multinomial logistic regression analysis.
Table 5.
Multinomial logistic regression model of food choice motives during the COVID-19.
| Food Choice Motive | Sustained Weight | Weight Loss | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOR (95% CI) | p-Value | AOR (95% CI) | p-Value | |
| Health | 1.139 (0.717–1.809) | 0.582 | 1.291 (0.907–1.838) | 0.156 |
| Convenience | 1.174 (0.751–1.836) | 0.482 | 1.354 (0.967–1.895) | 0.078 |
| Weight control | 1.176 (0.821–1.684) | 0.377 | 1.633 (1.230–2.168) | 0.001 * |
| Mood | 0.833 (0.537–1.291) | 0.414 | 0.920 (0.651–1.300) | 0.637 |
| Natural content | 0.950 (0.632–1.426) | 0.804 | 0.653 (0.481–0.886) | 0.006 * |
| Sensory appeal | 0.784 (0.501–1.227) | 0.287 | 0.828 (0.586–1.169) | 0.283 |
| Price | 1.075 (0.751–1.541) | 0.692 | 0.902 (0.694–1.172) | 0.441 |
Reference group: weight gain. * Significant difference was considered at p < 0.05.
4. Discussion
Emerging findings revealed that the prevalence of overweightness/obesity increased from 39.5% (pre-pandemic) to 40.6% (during the pandemic) due to the pandemic lockdown. Furthermore, 48.6% of the youths gained an average body weight of 3.90 ± 2.92 kg after 15 months of the COVID-19 outbreak in Malaysia. A similar trend of findings was obtained in Tan, Tan, and Tan [5], whereby it is reported that Malaysian university students who gained weight in the first 4 months of pandemic confinement put on an additional 3.9 kg. Malaysian youths in the current study had a higher percentage of weight gain than adults in Belgium (28.6% in April 2020) [17], adults in China (30.6% in March/April 2020) [18] and adults in Sri Lanka (38.5% in May/June 2021) [19].
An appreciable proportion of Malaysian youths (47.0% to 73.0%) altered their food choice motives due to the pandemic. Overall these findings are in accordance with a recent study by Marty, de Lauzon-Guillain, Labesse, and Nicklaus [6] among adults residing in France during the COVID-19 lockdown. Interestingly, it was observed that price was rated with the highest mean scores regardless of the pandemic situation. Convenience surpassed sensory appeal and ranked as the second highest-rated food choice motive in pandemic confinement. The COVID-19 economic recession drove a spike in the unemployment rate and caused devastating losses in incomes. Youths, who generally have the least work experience, have been more likely to drift out of the labour market in this unprecedented crisis [20]. Changes in the income elasticity of food demand during the COVID-19 pandemic may partly explain why food price emerged as the most important determinant of food choice among youths in Malaysia.
Of the 10 food choice motives, no significant difference in the mean score of mood, familiarity, sensory appeal, and religion was observed. Food decisions in accordance with these previously mentioned motives were remarkably resilient despite the COVID-19 outbreak. Moreover, familiarity was also rated a relatively low priority during the pandemic lockdown. These findings were broadly in line with previous studies by Asma et al. [14] and Mohd-Any, Mahdzan, and Cher [21], which reported that familiarity was the least prominent food choice motive among Malaysian adults. Another important finding to be highlighted is that mood was not the main determinant for food choice, although there are a few studies that have demonstrated that the pandemic lockdown was associated with increased emotional eating and binge eating [22,23,24].
The pandemic lockdown posed a profound impact on the food choice motives of Malaysian youths. Food decisions during the COVID-19 lockdown relied heavily on convenience (a rise of 48.5%), weight control (a rise of 47.0%), health (a rise of 45.3%), and natural content (a rise of 44.1%), signalling that Malaysian youths made healthier food choices compared to previously (Table 3). However, these findings were unsurprising, because obesity is recognized as one of the predisposing factors for COVID-19 [25]. People may deliberately demand nutritious foods or functional foods with reasonable health claims to reduce the risk of infection. Fear of infection, engagement in healthy eating as a means of obtaining optimum immunity, and a greater health consciousness during the pandemic could be among the factors that drove healthier food choices [26]. On the other hand, convenience recorded the highest percentage increase among the 10 food choice motives. The increase was mainly driven by more home cooking and travel restrictions enacted by the Federal Government of Malaysian during the nationwide lockdowns [27].
It has been previously reported that unhealthy food choices contribute to obesity and its relevant co-comorbidities, including hypertension, type II diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases [28]. In line with those previously mentioned, the current study also examined the association between food choice motives and weight trajectories over the pandemic confinement. Of the seven motives in the multinomial regression model, only weight control and natural content were associated with the weight trajectory status. Youths who took weight control into consideration when making food choices were more likely to lose weight during the pandemic confinement (AOR = 1.633, CI = 1.230–2.168, p = 0.001). These findings generally support the notion that cutting back on calories and fat was an effective strategy for shedding weight during the COVID-19 lockdown [29]. On the contrary, youths who gained weight due to the pandemic lockdown showed a greater tendency of selecting foods with natural content than those in the weight loss category (AOR = 0.653, CI = 0.481–0.886, p = 0.006). One possible explanation is that some functional foods that come with natural content may also contain significant amounts of added sugars or salt [30]. Overconsumption of functional foods with added sugar can be the underlying reason for gaining additional weight in this unprecedented pandemic.
Findings presented in the current study must be interpreted within the context of limitations. Respondents in the current study were required to retrospectively recall their pre-pandemic food choice motives and body weight, which can potentially lead to reporting biases. Findings in the current study may not reflect the food choice motives of all Malaysian youths, which is attributable to the fact that those aged 18–24 and/or with single marital status were over-represented. In view of the enactment of physical distancing order, data collection was conducted using Google Forms, which requires internet access. This approach had ruled out those without internet access from taking part in this study. Despite those previously mentioned, this study is the first that investigated changes in the food choice motives and weight status of Malaysian youths in the time of COVID-19.
5. Conclusions
The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the food choice motives of Malaysian youths, in addition to a surge in the prevalence of overweightness/obesity. Health, convenience, weight control, natural content, ethical concern, and price were important drivers of food choice during the pandemic lockdown. In general, youths in the current study made healthier food choices to mitigate the risk of COVID-19 infection. Understanding changes in food choice motives may be useful in the formulation of relevant intervention strategies to ease the burden of overweightness/obesity among Malaysian youths in the post COVID-19 era. In addition, interventions targeting those who gained weight during the pandemic should focus on food label reading for the selection of wiser functional food choices in future.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.T.T., C.X.T. and S.S.T.; Data curation, S.T.T., C.X.T. and S.S.T.; Formal analysis, S.T.T., C.X.T. and S.S.T.; Investigation, S.T.T., C.X.T. and S.S.T.; Methodology, S.T.T., C.X.T. and S.S.T.; Writing—original draft, S.T.T.; Writing—review and editing, C.X.T. and S.S.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Management and Science University, Malaysia (Reference number: MSU-RMC-02/FR01/06/L1/040).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Conflicts of Interest
All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Statement
This research has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Management and Science University, Malaysia. All authors attest to this manuscript as presented.
Transparency Declaration
The lead author affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the reported study. The reporting of this work is compliant with STROBE guidelines. The lead author affirms that no important aspects of the study have been omitted and that any discrepancies from the study as planned have been explained.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Ministry of Health Malaysia Situasi Terkini COVID-19 di Malaysia 1 September 2021. [(accessed on 1 September 2021)]; Available online: https://covid-19.moh.gov.my/terkini.
- 2.Department of Statistics Malaysia. [(accessed on 1 June 2021)];Current Population Estimates, Malaysia. 2020 Available online: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=155&bul_id=OVByWjg5YkQ3MWFZRTN5bDJiaEVhZz09&menu_id=L0pheU43NWJwRWVSZklWdzQ4TlhUUT09.
- 3.National Security Council Pelan Pemulihan Negara. [(accessed on 3 August 2021)]; Available online: https://covid-19.moh.gov.my/faqsop/pelan-pemulihan-negara.
- 4.Ismail M.H., Ghazi T.I.M., Hamzah M.H., Manaf L.A., Tahir R.M., Nasir A.M., Omar A.E. Impact of Movement Control Order (MCO) due to coronavirus disease (covid-19) on food waste generation: A case study in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Sustainability. 2020;12:8848. doi: 10.3390/su12218848. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tan S.T., Tan S.S., Tan C.X. Screen time-based sedentary behaviour, eating regulation and weight status of university students during the COVID-19 lockdown. Nutr. Food Sci. 2021 doi: 10.1108/NFS-05-2021-0156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Marty L., de Lauzon-Guillain B., Labesse M., Nicklaus S. Food choice motives and the nutritional quality of diet during the COVID-19 lockdown in France. Appetite. 2021;157:105005. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Department of Statistics Malaysia Income of the E-Commerce Transactions Surged 30.0 Percent in the First Quarter 2021. [(accessed on 1 September 2021)]; Available online: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=489&bul_id=c1FiaHRCQnlRdkxzUUFkNFJncWtEQT09&menu_id=b0pIV1E3RW40VWRTUkZocEhyZ1pLUT09.
- 8.Abdullah R.G., Mersat N.I., Wong S.K. Implications of COVID-19 pandemic on household food security: Experience from Sarawak, Malaysia. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2021;22:1–13. doi: 10.33736/ijbs.3159.2021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) What Will Children Be Eating in a Post-COVID World? An East Asia and Pacific Perspective. [(accessed on 1 September 2021)]. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/eap/stories/what-will-children-be-eating-post-covid-world.
- 10.Krejcie R.V., Morgan D.W. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ. Psychol. Mes. 1970;30:607–610. doi: 10.1177/001316447003000308. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Department of Statistics Malaysia Population Quick Info. [(accessed on 20 January 2021)]; Available online: http://pqi.stats.gov.my/result.php?token=f87b1a5ee1005723b60ad9a834cbe797.
- 12.Tan S.T., Tan C.X., Tan S.S. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and weight status of university students during the covid-19 lockdown: A cross-national comparative study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:7125. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.World Health Organization (WHO) The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment. Volume 56 WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Asma A., Nawalyah A.G., Rokiah M.Y., Mohd Nasir M.T. Comparison of food choice motives between malay husbands and wives in an urban community. Malays. J. Nutr. 2010;16:69–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bursac Z., Gauss C.H., Williams D.K., Hosmer D.W. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol. Med. 2008;3:17. doi: 10.1186/1751-0473-3-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Maskey R., Fei J., Nguyen H.O. Use of exploratory factor analysis in maritime research. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 2018;34:91–111. doi: 10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.06.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Drieskens S., Berger N., Vandevijvere S., Gisle L., Braekman E., Charafeddine R., De Ridder K., Demarest S. Short-term impact of the COVID-19 confinement measures on health behaviours and weight gain among adults in Belgium. Arch. Public Health. 2021;79:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00542-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhu Q., Li M., Ji Y., Shi Y., Zhou J., Li Q., Qin R., Zhuang X. “Stay-at-Home” lifestyle effect on weight gain during the COVID-19 outbreak confinement in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:1813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sooriyaarachchi P.V., Francis T., King N., Jayawardena R. Increased physical inactivity and weight gain during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sri Lanka: An online cross-sectional survey. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2021;15:102185. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.International Labour Organization and Asian Development Bank . Tackling the COVID-19 Youth Employment Crisis in Asia and the Pacific. ILO; Manila, Philippines: ADB; Bangkok, Thailand: 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mohd-Any A.A., Mahdzan N.S., Cher C.S. Food choice motives of different ethnics and the foodies segment in Kuala Lumpur. Br. Food J. 2014;116:1879–1896. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-07-2013-0170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cecchetto C., Aiello M., Gentili C., Ionta S., Osimo S.A. Increased emotional eating during COVID-19 associated with lockdown, psychological and social distress. Appetite. 2021;160:105122. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Palmer K., Bschaden A., Stroebele-Benschop N. Changes in lifestyle, diet, and body weight during the first COVID 19 ‘lockdown’ in a student sample. Appetite. 2021;167:105638. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McAtamney K., Mantzios M., Egan H., Wallis D.J. Emotional eating during COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Exploring the roles of alexithymia and emotion dysregulation. Appetite. 2021;161:105120. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kwok S., Adam S., Ho J.H., Iqbal Z., Turkington P., Razvi S., Le Roux C.W., Soran H., Syed A.A. Obesity: A critical risk factor in the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin. Obes. 2020;10:1–11. doi: 10.1111/cob.12403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ogundijo D.A., Tas A.A., Onarinde B.A. Exploring the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on eating and purchasing behaviours of people living in England. Nutrients. 2021;13:1499. doi: 10.3390/nu13051499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Boyacι-Gündüz C.P., Ibrahim S.A., Wei O.C., Galanakis C.M. Transformation of the food sector: Security and resilience during the covid-19 pandemic. Foods. 2021;10:497. doi: 10.3390/foods10030497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Marsola C.D.M., Cunha L.M., Carvalho-Ferreira J.P., da Cunha D.T. Factors underlying food choice motives in a Brazilian sample: The association with socioeconomic factors and risk perceptions about chronic diseases. Foods. 2020;9:1114. doi: 10.3390/foods9081114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Santos I., Sniehotta F.F., Marques M.M., Carraça E.V., Teixeira P.J. Prevalence of personal weight control attempts in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 2017;18:32–50. doi: 10.1111/obr.12466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ellis E. Functional Foods. [(accessed on 1 September 2021)]. Available online: https://www.eatright.org/food/nutrition/healthy-eating/functional-foods.