Skip to main content
Journal of Fungi logoLink to Journal of Fungi
. 2021 Oct 21;7(11):891. doi: 10.3390/jof7110891

Morphology and Phylogeny Reveal Vamsapriyaceae fam. nov. (Xylariales, Sordariomycetes) with Two Novel Vamsapriya Species

Ya-Ru Sun 1,2,3, Ning-Guo Liu 2,4, Milan C Samarakoon 2, Ruvishika S Jayawardena 2,3, Kevin D Hyde 2,3,5, Yong Wang 1,*
Editors: Samantha C Karunarathna, Saowaluck Tibpromma
PMCID: PMC8622883  PMID: 34829180

Abstract

Phylogenetic analyses of combined LSU, rpb2, tub2 and ITS sequence data of representative Xylariales taxa indicated that Diabolocovidia, Didymobotryum and Vamsapriya cluster together and form a distinct clade in Xylariales. Morphological comparison also shows their distinctiveness from other families of Xylariales. Therefore, we introduce it as a novel family, Vamsapriyaceae. Based on morphological characteristics, Podosporium and Tretophragmia, which were previously classified in Ascomycota genera incertae sedis, are now included in the Vamsapriyaceae. In addition, three Vamsapriya species, V. chiangmaiensis sp. nov, V. uniseptata sp. nov, and V. indica are described and illustrated in this paper.

Keywords: three new taxa, Ascomycota genera incertae sedis, multi-gene phylogeny, new family, taxonomy

1. Introduction

Xylariales is a large order with both conspicuous and inconspicuous fruiting bodies, and unitunicate, perithecial ascomycetes [1,2]. Many species of Xylariales are saprobes and endophytes [3,4]. Some Xylariales species can produce secondary metabolites which are especially important for the pharmaceutical chemical industry [3,5,6].

Xylariales was established by Nannfeldt [7] to accommodate the type family Xylariaceae, along with Diatrypaceae, Hypocreaceae, Hyponectriaceae, Lasiosphaeriaceae and Polystigmataceae. The previous classification of Xylariales was mainly based on morphology [8,9,10,11,12,13]. With the development of molecular technology, the classification basis of Xylariales was gradually diversified [2,14,15,16]. Smith et al. [2] performed the first multigene analysis to find the familial relationships within Xylariales and treated the order with seven families. Lumbsch and Huhndorf [17] listed six families in Xylariales, while Senanayake et al. [18] revised Xylariales and accepted 11 families. Hyde et al. [19] redefined the families of Sordariomycetes and accepted 15 families in Xylariales based on morphology and multigene analysis, viz. Barrmaeliaceae, Cainiaceae, Clypeosphaeriaceae, Coniocessiaceae, Diatrypaceae, Graphostromataceae, Hansfordiaceae, Hypoxylaceae, Induratiaceae, Lopadostomataceae, Microdochiaceae, Polystigmataceae, Requienellaceae, Xylariaceae and Zygosporiaceae. Hyde et al. [20] introduced Fasciatisporaceae to accommodate Fasciatispora in Xylariales. However, the taxonomic position of many taxa in Xylariales are still uncertain, and they are treated as genera incertae sedis [20,21]. This may probably be due to monospecific genera with either sexual or asexual morph, with no additional collections and lack of molecular data, and sometimes due to the polyphyletic nature of some genera (such as Anthostomella and Xylaria) [22,23,24,25].

Vamsapriya was introduced by Gawas and Bhat [26] based on abundant asexual morphs of the genus, which is characterized by erect, cylindrical, dark brown, synnematous conidiophores, monotretic, clavate to cylindrical conidiogenous cells, and cylindrical or broadly fusiform or obclavate, brown to dark brown conidia [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. The first sexual morph of Vamsapriya was described by Dai et al. [28], which has solitary, immersed ascomata visible as black dots, 8spored, unitunicate asci, and hyaline, fusiform apiospores. They linked the sexual morph of V. bambusicola (MFLUCC 11-0637) to the asexual morph of V. bambusicola (MFLUCC 11-0477) using ITS phylogenies [27,28]. The phylogenetic placement of Vamsapriya has been confusing. Dai et al. [27,28] and Jiang et al. [31] accepted Vamsapriya into the Xylariaceae. However, phylogenetic analyses using broader taxon sampling indicated that Vamsapriya was distant from Xylariaceae [19,34].

This study aims to resolve the phylogenetic position of Vamsapriya. Three Vamsapriya collections (V. chiangmaiensis sp. nov, V. uniseptata sp. nov, and V. indica) on bamboo from China and Thailand are described and illustrated herein. Vamsapriya, along with Diabolocovidia and Didymobotryum, formed a distinct monophyletic clade in the combined LSU, rpb2, tub2 and ITS phylogenetic analyses. A new family, Vamsapriyaceae, is thus established. Podosporium and Tretophragmia are also accepted in Vamsapriyaceae based on their morphology of hyphomycetous asexual morph.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection, Examination, Isolation and Conservation

Fresh specimens were collected from bamboo in terrestrial habitats in China and Thailand between August 2019 and September 2020. Sample collections and observations were followed by the method described in Senanayake et al. [35]. The samples were stored in envelopes and taken to the laboratory for examination. Morphological observations were done using a stereo microscope (LEICA M125 C, Wetzlar, Germany). The fungal structures were captured using a Nikon ECLIPSE Ni compound microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) fitted with a NikonDS-Ri2 digital camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The Tarosoft (R) Image Frame Work software was used to take the measurements. Adobe Photoshop CS6 software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) was used to do photo-plates.

Single spore isolation was carried out to obtain pure cultures following the method described in Senanayake et al. [35]. Germinated spores were transferred to pure potato dextrose agar (PDA) and cultivated under normal light at 26 °C for four weeks. Herbarium specimens were deposited in the Fungarium of Mae Fah Luang University (MFLU), Chiang Rai, Thailand, and the herbarium of the Guizhou Academy of Agriculture Sciences (GZAAS), Guiyang, China. Pure cultures were deposited in the Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection (MFLUCC) and the Guizhou Culture Collection (GZCC). FacesofFungi (FoF) and Index Fungorum numbers were obtained as described in Jayasiri et al. [36] and Index Fungorum [37].

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification and Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh fungal mycelia using the Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (GD2416 BIOMIGA, San Diego, CA, USA). Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were carried out using a BIO-RAD T100 Thermal Cycler in a 20 μL reaction volume which contained 10 μL 2x PCR Master Mix, 7 μL ddH2O, 1 μL of each primer, and 1 μL template DNA. The PCR thermal cycle program and primers are given in Table 1. The PCR products were sent for sequencing to SinoGenoMax, Beijing, China.

Table 1.

Primers and PCR protocol used in this study.

Locus Primers PCR Procedure Reference
LSU LR0R 94 °C 3 min; 35 cycles of 94 °C 30 s, 52 °C 30 s, 72 °C 1 min; 72 °C 8 min; 4 °C on hold [38,39]
LR5
ITS ITS5
ITS4

2.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

The sequences used in this study (Table 2) were downloaded from GenBank according to the results of blast searches and previous studies [27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Alignments for each locus were carried out in MAFFT v7.212 [40]. AliView [41] was used for checking the alignments and changing the format. Terminal ends and ambiguous regions of the alignment were deleted manually. Four single gene alignments were combined using the Sequence Matrix [42].

Table 2.

Taxa names, strain numbers and corresponding sequences used for the molecular phylogenetic analyses.

Taxa Strain Numbers ITS LSU rpb2 tub2
Amphirosellinia fushanensis HAST 91111209 GU339496 N/A GQ848339 GQ495950
Amphirosellinia nigrospora HAST 91092308 GU322457 N/A GQ848340 GQ495951
Amphisphaeria sorbi MFLUCC 13-0721 NR_153531 KP744475 N/A N/A
Amphisphaeria thailandica MFLU 18-0794 NR_168783 NG_068588 MK033640 MK033639
Anthostomella formosa MFLUCC 14-0170 KP297403 KP340544 KP340531 KP406614
Anthostomella obesa MFLUCC 14-0171 KP297405 KP340546 KP340533 KP406616
Anthostomelloides krabiensis MFLUCC 15-0678 KX305927 KX305928 KX305929 N/A
Barrmaelia rhamnicola CBS 142772 NR_153497 N/A MF488999 MF489018
Barrmaelia rappazii CBS 142771 NR_153496 N/A MF488998 MF489017
Barrmaelia macrospora CBS 142768 NR_167684 N/A MF488995 MF489014
Biscogniauxia arima WSP 122 NR_167683 N/A GQ304736 AY951672
Biscogniauxia mangiferae MFLU 18-0827 MN337232 MN336236 MN366247 MN509782
Biscogniauxia nummularia MUCL 51395 NR_153649 NG_066378 KY624236 KX271241
Biscogniauxia repanda ATCC 62606 KY610383 KY610428 N/A KX271242
Brunneiperidium gracilentum MFLUCC 14-0011 KP297400 KP340542 KP340528 KP406611
Brunneiperidium involucratum MFLUCC 14-0009 KP297399 KP340541 KP340527 KP406610
Cainia anthoxanthis MFLUCC 15-0539 NR_138407 NG_070382 N/A N/A
Cainia graminis MFLUCC 15-0540 KR092793 KR092781 N/A N/A
Cainia desmazieri CBS 137.62 MH858124 MH869702 N/A N/A
Clypeosphaeria mamillana CBS 140735 N/A NG_067338 MF489001 MH704637
Collodiscula bambusae GZUH 0102 KP054279 KP054280 KP276675 N/A
Collodiscula japonica CBS 124266 JF440974 JF440974 KY624273 KY624316
Collodiscula fangjingshanensis GZUH0109 KR002590 KR002591 KR002592 KR002589
Collodiscula leigongshanensis GZUH0107 KP054281 KP054282 KR002588 KR002587
Coniocessia anandra CBS 125766 MH863747 MH875215 N/A N/A
Coniocessia maxima CBS 593.74 NR_137751 NG_070051 N/A N/A
Coniocessia cruciformis CBS 126674 MH864206 MH875663 N/A N/A
Coniolariella limonispora CBS 283.64 KF719198 KF719210 N/A N/A
Coniolariella gamsii CBS 114379 GU553325 GU553329 N/A N/A
Daldinia macaronesica CBS 113040 JX658504 KY610477 KY624294 KX271266
Daldinia loculatoides CBS 113279 MH862918 MH874491 KY624247 KX271246
Diabolocovidia claustri CBS 146630 MT373367 MT373350 N/A N/A
Diatrypella heveae MFLUCC 17-0368 NR_154046 NG_069531 N/A MG334557
Diatrypella tectonae MFLUCC 12-0172 NR_154029 NG_069423 N/A KY421043
Didymobotryum rigidum JCM 8837 LC228650 LC228707 N/A N/A
Entosordaria quercina CBS 142774 NR_153499 N/A MF489004 MF489022
Entosordaria perfidiosa CBS 142773 NR_153498 N/A MF489003 MF489021
Eutypa linearis MFLUCC 11-0503 KU940150 KU863138 N/A N/A
Fasciatispora arengae MFLUCC 15-0326b MK120301 MK120276 N/A N/A
Fasciatispora arengae MFLUCC 15-0326c MK120302 MK120277 N/A N/A
Graphostroma platystomum CBS 270.87 JX658535 N/A N/A HG934108
Hansfordia pulvinata CBS 254.59 KF893288 MH869394 N/A N/A
Hansfordia pulvinata CBS 144422 MK442587 MK442527 N/A N/A
Hansfordia pruni CBS 125767 MH863748 MH875216 N/A N/A
Hansfordia pruni CBS 276.51 MH856854 MH868374 N/A N/A
Hypoxylon fragiforme MUCL 51264 KC477229 NG_066364 N/A KX271282
Hypoxylon neosublenormandii MFLUCC 11-0618 NR_155174 NG_066168 N/A N/A
Induratia sp. SMH1255 MN250031 AY780069 N/A AY780119
Induratia fengyangensis CBS 126601 HM034852 HM034858 HM034847 HM034839
Induratia ziziphi MFLUCC 17-2662 MK762705 MK762712 MK791281 MK776958
Induratia thailandica MFLUCC 17-2669 MK762707 MK762714 MK791283 MK776960
Lopadostoma dryophilum CBS 133213 NR_132028 N/A KC774526 MF489023
Lopadostoma americanum CBS 133211 NR_132027 N/A N/A N/A
Lopadostoma fagi CBS 133206 NR_132029 N/A KC774531 N/A
Lopadostoma turgidum CBS 133207 NR_132036 N/A KC774562 MF489024
Microdochium lycopodinum CBS 125585 NR_145223 KP858952 KP859125 KP859080
Microdochium phragmitis CBS 285.71 NR_132916 NG_058147 KP859122 KP859077
Nemania abortiva WSP 71221 GU292816 N/A GQ844768 GQ470219
Nemania beaumontii HAST 405 GU292819 N/A GQ844772 GQ470222
Nemania bipapillata HAST 90080610 GU292818 N/A GQ844771 GQ470221
Nemania primolutea HAST 91102001 EF026121 N/A GQ844767 EF025607
Podosordaria mexicana WSP 176 GU324762 N/A GQ853039 GQ844840
Podosordaria muli WSP 167 GU324761 N/A GQ853038 GQ844839
Poronia pileiformis WSP 88113001 GU324760 GQ853037 GQ502720
Poronia punctata CBS 656.78 KT281904 KY610496 KY624278 KX271281
Requienella fraxini CBS 140475 NR_138415 N/A N/A N/A
Requienella seminuda CBS 140502 NR_154630 MH878683 MK523300 N/A
Rosellinia buxi JDR-99 GU300070 N/A GQ844780 GQ470228
Rosellinia necatrix HAST 89062904 EF026117 KF719204 GQ844779 EF025603
Vamsapriya aquatica DLUCC:970 MZ420740 N/A N/A N/A
Vamsapriya bambusicola MFLUCC 11-0477 KM462835 KM462836 KM462834 KM462833
Vamsapriya breviconidiophora MFLUCC 14-0436 MF621584 MF621588 N/A N/A
Vamsapriya chiangmaiensis MFLUCC 21-0065 MZ613171 MZ613168 N/A N/A
Vamsapriya indica MFLUCC 12-0544 KM462839 KM462840 KM462841 KM462838
Vamsapriya indica DLUCC: 2062 MZ420747 MZ420762 MZ442699 N/A
Vamsapriya indica MFLUCC 21-0066 MZ613172 MZ613169 OK560921 N/A
Vamsapriya khunkonensis MFLUCC 13-0497 KM462830 KM462831 KM462829 KM462828
Vamsapriya uniseptata GZCC 21-0892 MZ613173 MZ613170 N/A N/A
Vamsapriya yunnana KUMCC 18-0008 MG833874 MG833873 MG833875 N/A
Xylaria arbuscula CBS 126415 KY610394 KY610463 KY624287 KX271257
Xylaria bambusicola MFLUCC 11-0606 KU940160 KU863148 KU940183 N/A
Xylaria hypoxylon CBS122620 AM993141 KM186301 KM186302 KX271279
Zygosporium oscheoides MFLUCC 14-0402 MF621585 MF621589 N/A N/A
Zygosporium minus HKAS99625 MF621586 MF621590 N/A N/A

Abbreviations: ATCC: American Type Culture Collection, Virginia, USA; CBS: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, Netherlands; CPC: Culture collection of Pedro Crous, housed at CBS; GZCC: Guizhou Culture Collection, Guiyang, China; GZUH: The herbarium of Guizhou University, Guiyang, China; HAST: Herbarium, Research Center for Biodiversity, Academia Sinica, Taipei, China; HKAS: The Herbarium of Cryptogams, Kunming Institute of Botany Academia Sinica, Kunming, China; JDR: Herbarium of Jack D. Rogers; KUMCC: The Kunming Institute of Botany Culture Collection, Kunming, China; MFLU: The Fungarium of Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand; MUCL: Mycothèque de l’Université Catholique de Louvian, Belgium; WSP: Washington State University, U.S.A. The newly generated sequences are indicated in red. Ex-type strains are in bold.

Single gene analyses were done to compare the topologies and clade stabilities, respectively. Single and combined phylogenies were subjected to Bayesian posterior probability (BYPP), maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) analyses. The BYPP analysis was performed in MrBayes v. 3.2.6 [43]. MrModeltest v. 2.3 [44] was used to estimate the best model. GTR+I+G model was chosen for LSU and rpb2; SYM+I+G (Xylariales analysis) and GTR+G (Vamsapriya analysis) models were chosen for ITS; HKY+I+G model was chosen for tub2. Six chains were run and trees were sampled every 1000th generation, the temperature value of the heated chain was set at 0.15. The first 25% sampled trees were discarded as “burn-in”, and the remaining trees were used for calculating BYPP in the majority rule consensus tree. The ML analyses were carried out using IQ-TREE [45] on the IQ-TREE web server (http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at, 6 September 2021) under partitioned models. The best-fit substitution models were determined by W-IQ-TREE [45]: TIM3e+I+G4 for LSU; TIM3+F+I+G4 for rpb2; TIM2+F+I+G4 for tub2; SYM+I+G4 for ITS. Ultrafast bootstrap analysis was implemented with 1,000 replicates. The MP analyses were carried out with a heuristic search in PAUP v. 4.0 b10 [46]. Bootstrap analysis was used to estimate clade stability, including 1000 replicates, each with 10 replicates of random stepwise addition of taxa [47].

Phylogenetic trees were viewed using FigTree v1.4.4 [48] and modified in Adobe Illustrator CS6 software (Adobe Systems, USA). The sequences generated from our collections were deposited in GenBank.

3. Results

3.1. Phylogenetic Analyses

In Xylariales phylogenetic analyses, the final combined dataset of Xylariales consists of 84 strains representing fifteen families along with the outgroup Amphisphaeria sorbi (MFLUCC 13-0721) and A. thailandica (MFLU 18-0794) in Amphisphaeriales. The aligned sequence matrix comprises LSU (1–829), rpb2 (830–1875), tub2 (1876–3579) and ITS (3580–4305), sequence data for a total of 4305 characters, including coded alignment gaps. Among them, 1894 characters were constant, 374 variable characters were parsimony-uninformative and 2037 characters were parsimony informative. The matrix had 2693 distinct alignment patterns. The BYPP, ML, and MP analyses based on combined sequence data provided similar tree topology. For BYPP, the standard deviation of split frequencies was reached at 0.0099 after 2,980,000 generations. The most likely tree (−ln = 66,531.894) is presented (Figure 1). The MP analysis resulted in two trees with TL = 15,668, CI = 0.302, RI = 0.524, RC = 0.158, HI = 0.698.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Maximum likelihood (RAxML) tree, based on analysis of a combined dataset of LSU, rpb2, tub2 and ITS sequence data. The tree is rooted with Amphisphaeria sorbi (MFLUCC 13-0721) and A. thailandica (MFLU 18-0794). Bootstrap support values for ML and MP greater than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 0.95 are given near nodes, respectively. Ex-type strains are in bold, the new isolates are in red.

The single locus trees (Supplemental Figures S1–S4) and the multi-locus (LSU, rpb2, tub2 and ITS) tree (Figure 1) showed similar tree topology. In multigene analyses, Vamsapriya species clustered with Diabolocovidia claustri and Didymobotryum rigidum, and they formed an internal distinct clade with maximum support (ML-bs = 100%, MP-bs = 100%, BYPP = 1.00). Xylariaceae, Induratiaceae and Clypeosphaeriaceae clustered together, which is a sister to Vamsapriyaceae without significant support. Moreover, V. chiangmaiensis (MFLUCC 21-0065) formed a sister clade to V. yunnana; however, the support for this relationship in Figure 1 is extremely poor and does not exist in Figure 2, and V. uniseptata (GZCC 21-0892) is sister to V. indica. Our isolate MFLUCC 21-0066 grouped in V. indica clade with MFLUCC 12-0544 and DLUCC:2062, indicating they are phylogenetically the same species. Two Anthostomella (Xylariaceae) species, A. formosa (MFLUCC 14-0170) and A. obesa (MFLUCC 14-0171) formed a distinct clade and is sister to Cainiaceae.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Maximum likelihood (RAxML) tree for Vamsapriya, based on ITS sequence data. The tree is rooted with Diabolocovidia claustra (CBS 146630) and Didymobotryum rigidum (JCM-8837). Ex-type strains are in bold, the new isolates are in red.

The ITS based on Vamsapriya analyses contained 12 taxa and rooted with Diabolocovidia claustra (CBS 146630) and Didymobotryum rigidum (JCM-8837). The manually adjusted ITS alignment contained 563 characters. The best scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of −1737.963458 is presented (Figure 2). Maximum parsimony analysis comprised 563 characters, of which 446 were constant, 54 were parsimony-informative, and 63 were parsimony-uninformative; the tree length is 184, CI = 0.739, RI = 0.597, RC = 0.441, HI = 0.261. The results showed our strain MFLUCC 21-0066 clustered together with V. indica (MFLUCC 12-0544 and DLUCC:2062) with good supports (ML-bs = 94%, MP-bs = 89%, BYPP = 1.00). Vamsapriya chiangmaiensis (MFLUCC 21-0065) formed a distinct clade, and Vamsapriya uniseptata (GZCC 21-0892) grouped with three V. indica (ML-bs = 79%, MP-bs = 61%).

3.2. Taxonomy

Vamsapriyaceae Y.R. Sun, Yong Wang bis & K.D. Hyde, fam. nov.

Index Fungorum number: IF558620; Facesoffungi number: FoF09926

Etymology: Name reflects the type genus

Type genus: Vamsapriya Gawas & Bhat

Saprobic on dead wood. Sexual morph: Ascomata solitary, scattered, immersed, subglobose, black, ostiolate. Peridium thin-walled, brown. Paraphyses hyaline, septate. Asci 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, short pedicellate, with a J+ apical ring. Ascospores apiosporous, fusiform to broad fusiform, hyaline. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous. Colonies on natural substrate effuse, black, velvety. Mycelium immersed, septate, branched. Synnemata present or absent; when present (Didymobotryum, Podosporium, Tretophragmia, Vamsapriya), synnemata erect, rigid, dark brown, composed of compact parallel conidiophores. Conidiophores erect, straight or curved, cylindrical, dark brown, septate. Conidiogenous cells mono- or polytretic, integrated, terminal, clavate to cylindrical, brown. Conidia catenate or solitary, acrogenous, simple, pigmented, multi-shaped, septate; when absent (Diabolocovidia, adapted from Crous et al. [49]), conidiophores micronematous, flexuous, mostly reduced to a terminal conidiogenous cell. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, subcylindrical to clavate, pale brown, smooth. Conidia catenate, acrogenous, brown, ellipsoid to obovoid, thin-walled, aseptate.

Notes: A new family, Vamsapriyaceae, is introduced to accommodate Diabolocovidia, Didymobotryum, Podosporium, Tretophragmia, and Vamsapriya. Their phylogenetic position, which is distinct from other families, supports the establishment of the new family within Xylariales. Although the phylogeny of Podosporium and Tretophragmia could not be inferred due to the lack of molecular data, their morphological characters resemble Didymobotryum and Vamsapriya in having brown to dark, simple, straight synnemata, monotretic conidiogenous cells and solitary, obclavate, multi-septate, dark brown conidia [50,51,52,53]. We thus temporarily accept Podosporium and Tretophragmia in Vamsapriyaceae based on morphology. Sequence data are needed to resolve their phylogenetic affinities.

Vamsapriya Gawas & Bhat, Mycotaxon 94: 150 (2006) [2005]

Index Fungorum number: IF29041; Facesoffungi number: FoF00372

Type species: Vamsapriya indica Gawas & Bhat, Mycotaxon 94: 150 (2006) [2005]

Saprobic on dead wood. Sexual morph: Ascomata solitary, scattered, immersed, subglobose, black, ostiolate. Peridium thin-walled, brown. Paraphyses hyaline, septate. Asci 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, straight, short pedicellate, with a J+ apical ring. Ascospores uniseriate or overlapping uniseriate, fusiform to broad fusiform, apiosporous, hyaline, pointed at both ends, surrounded by a mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous. Colonies on natural substrate effuse, black, velvety. Mycelium immersed, septate, branched. Conidiophores macronematous, synnematous, erect, straight or curved, dark brown, cylindrical, septate. Synnemata erect, rigid, dark brown, composed of compact parallel conidiophores. Conidiogenous cells monotretic, integrated, terminal, clavate to cylindrical. Conidia catenate or solitary, acrogenous, cylindrical, oblong, fusiform or obclavate, brown to dark brown, septate, verruculose.

Notes: Vamsapriya species are reported from tropical and subtropical regions, and most species are found in terrestrial as saprobes [26,27,28,29,30,31]. Nine species are accepted in the Vamsapriya, of which six have molecular data. Vamsapriya is the only holomorphic genus in Vamsapriyaceae, and V. bambusicola is the only species with a sexual-asexual connection in Vamsapriya. Bamboo seems to be the host preference for Vamsapriya species [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33].

Vamsapriya indica Gawas & Bhat, Mycotaxon 94: 150 (2006) [2005]

Index Fungorum number: IF550801; Facesoffungi number: FoF00374, Figure 3

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Vamsapriya indica (MFLU 21-0088) (a,b) Colonies on natural substrate. (c) Conidiophore and conidia. (df) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (gk) Conidia. (l) Germinated conidium. Scale bars: a = 2000 µm, b = 1000 µm, c = 200 µm, dl = 20 µm.

Saprobic on dead bamboo culms. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous. Colonies effuse, dark brown, hairy. Conidiophores macronematous, synnematous, single, erect, cylindrical, straight or slightly flexuous, dark brown, smooth-walled. Synnemata erect, straight or slightly flexuous, dark brown, rigid, with cylindrical to clavate apical fertile part, composed of compactly arranged conidiophores, 1300–1900 um long, 80–150 μm wide at the base, 30–40 μm wide in the middle, 60–140 μm wide at the apical fertile region, with basal portion immersed. Conidiogenous cells monotretic, integrated, terminal, brown, cylindrical to clavate, apically rounded, smooth-walled, 4.5–8.5 × 3–4.5 μm (x¯ = 6.5 × 4 μm, n = 30). Conidia catenate, acrogenous, cylindrical, rounded at the apex, taper and subtruncate at the base, olivaceous brown to brown, 2–8-septate, slightly constricted at the septa, smooth, 20–48 × 4.5–6.5 μm (x¯ = 32 × 5.5 μm, n = 20).

Cultural characters: Conidia germinated on PDA within 12 h, germ tubes produced from both ends. Colonies reached 20 mm diam. within four weeks at 26 °C, cottony, flat, circular, edge entire, white from above, white to yellow from the below.

Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Mae Taeng District, Pa Pae, Mushroom Research Center, on bamboo culms, 10 September 2020, H.W. Shen, M38 (MFLU 21-0088; living culture, MFLUCC 21-0066).

Notes: Vamsapriya indica is the type species of Vamsapriya [26]. Dai et al. [27] recollected V. indica from Thailand and provided the culture characters and sequences data. Bao et al. [32] reported it from a bamboo plant in a freshwater habitat in China. Including our collection, all of these four isolates are recorded from bamboo. Morphological comparison is shown in Table 3. Our collection has longer synnemata than those of the three isolates.

Table 3.

Synopsis of characters of Vamsapriya indica collections.

Taxon Host Habitat/Location Synnemata Conidiogenous Cells Conidia
V. indica (M 393674) Bamboo Terrestrial/India 700–1100 μm long, 60–160 μm wide at the base, 30–60 μm wide in the middle, 30–80 μm wide at the apical fertile region Monotretic, clavate, dark brown, 4–9 × 2.5–4.5 μm Catenate, acrogenous, brown, cylindrical, vermiform, 10–80 × 4–6 μm, 2–12-septate
V. indica (MFLU 13-0370) Bamboo Terrestrial/Thailand 700–1100 μm long, 60–160 μm wide at the base, 30–60 μm wide in the middle, 30–80 μm wide at the apical fertile region Monotretic, ellipsoidal, brown to dark brown, 4–9 × 2.5–4.5 μm (x¯ = 6.5 × 3.7 μm, n = 20) Catenate, cylindrical, pale brown to dark brown 35–290 × 4–6.5 μm (x¯ = 66.6 × 5.6 μm, n = 20), 1–3-septate when young, more than 20–septate at maturity
V. indica (HKAS 115803) Bamboo Freshwater/China 1145–1475 μm long, 105–235 μm wide at the base, 50–80 μm wide in the middle, 70–155 μm wide at the apical fertile region Monotretic, clavate, dark brown 5–9 × 3–5 μm (x¯ = 20 × 5 μm, n = 30) Catenate, brown to dark brown, cylindrical to obclavate, 15–30 × 4–6.5 μm (x¯ = 20 × 5 μm, n = 30), 1–4-septate
V. indica (MFLU 21-0088) Bamboo Terrestrial/Thailand 1300–1900 μm long, 80–150 μm wide at the base, 30–40 μm wide in the middle, 60–140 μm wide at the apical fertile region Cylindrical to clavate, brown, 4.5–8.5 × 3–4.5 μm (x¯ = 6.5 × 4 μm, n = 30) Catenate, olivaceous brown to brown, cylindrical, 20–48 × 4.5–6.5 μm (x¯ = 32 × 5.5 μm, n = 20), 2–8-septate

Vamsapriya chiangmaiensis Y.R. Sun, Yong Wang bis & K.D. Hyde, sp. nov.

Index Fungorum number: IF558618; Facesoffungi number: FoF09927, Figure 4

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Vamsapriya chiangmaiensis (MFLU 21-0087, holotype) (a,b) Appearance of ascomata on host substrate. (c) Vertical section of ascoma. (df) Asci. (g) Paraphyses. (h) Apical ring of asci. (im) Ascospores. (n) Germinated ascospore. (o) Ascospore stained in Indian ink. (p,q) Colonies on PDA. Scale bars: c = 200 μm, dg = 20 μm, f,ho = 10 µm.

Etymology: Name reflects the collected site.

Holotype: MFLU 21-0087

Saprobic on dead bamboo culms. Sexual morph: Ascomata 650–1000 × 650–850 μm, solitary scattered, immersed within the host cortex, visible as black, circular dots, in cross section globose to subglobose. Ostiole raised, centric, periphysate ostiolar canal. Peridium composed of hyaline inner layer and dark brown to dark outer layer. Paraphyses long, hyaline, unbranched, septate, 1.5–4 μm wide (x¯ = 2 μm, n = 15). Asci 8-spored, unitunicate, straight or slightly curved, cylindrical, short pedicellate, with apical ring, 140–190 × 6.5–12 μm (x¯ = 160 × 9 μm, n = 15). Ascospores uniseriate, fusiform, 17–26 × 5.5–8 μm (x¯ = 20.5 × 6.5 μm, n = 30), constricted apiosporous with a large cell 12.5–22 μm length, guttulate; basal cell 3.5–6.5 μm length, hyaline, smooth-walled, surround a gelatinous mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characters: Ascospores germinated on PDA within 12 h, germ tubes produced from one end. Colonies reached 45 mm diam. within four weeks at 26 °C, flat, circular, cottony. White from above; brown to dark brown in the center, white to pale brown around from below.

Material examined: Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Mae Taeng District, Mushroom Research Center, on bamboo culms, 15 July 2020, Y.R. Sun, M35 (MFLU 21-0087, holotype; ex-type living culture, MFLUCC 21-0065).

Notes: Vamsapriya chiangmaiensis is the second species that has a sexual morph in Vamsapriya. It is similar to V. bambusicola in having solitary, subglobose ascomata, 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical asci and fusiform hyaline ascospores. It can be distinguished by the longer asci (140–190 μm vs. 115–140 μm). In addition, polymorphic nucleotides from the ITS region showed 37 base differences, and the details are given in Table 4. Therefore, we identified V. chiangmaiensis as a new species following the suggestions for species delineation [54].

Table 4.

Nucleotide differences in the ITS regions of V. bambusicola and V. chiangmaiensis. Numbers are in reference to the nucleotide position of DNA sequences (V. bambusicola) submitted in GenBank.

Species ITS
42 52 73 74 82 106 127 167 171 173 194 196 203 206 207 208 209 213 214
V. bambusicola (MFLUCC 11-0477) C T C G T T A A C C C G C C T C T A A
V. chiangmaiensis (MFLUCC 21-0065) T C G T C C G C T T G A T A C T C T T
216 221 229 232 233 235 239 421 432 442 446 447 448 451 461 465 557 558
V. bambusicola (MFLUCC 11-0477) T A A C T T G T C T C T C C T G T T
V. chiangmaiensis (MFLUCC 21-0065) A G T T C C A C T C T G T T C A C A

Vamsapriya uniseptata N.G. Liu & K.D. Hyde , sp. nov.

Index Fungorum number: IF558619; Facesoffungi number: FoF09928, Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Vamsapriya uniseptata (GZAAS:21-0378, holotype) (a,b) Colonies on natural substrate. (c) Conidiophores and conidia. (df) Conidiogenous cells and developing conidia. (gk) Conidia. (l) Germinated conidium. Scale bars: c = 100 µm, d,e,g,h = 5 µm, f = 10 µm.

Etymology: Name reflects the 1-septate conidia.

Holotype: GZAAS 21-0378

Saprobic on submerged decaying wood in terrestrial habitat. Colonies on natural substrate effuse, black, velvety. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous. Mycelium mostly immersed, composed of septate, branched, hyaline to brown hyphae. Conidiophores macronematous, synnematous, erect, straight or broadly curved, dark brown, cylindrical, septate. Synnemata erect, rigid, dark brown, composed of compact parallel conidiophores, up to 1300 µm long, 30–50 µm wide in the middle. Conidiogenous cells monotretic, integrated, terminal, clavate, brown to dark brown. Conidia catenate, acrogenous, olivaceous brown, smooth, oblong, rounded at the apex, taper and subtruncate at the base, 1-septate at the middle, septa thickened and darkened, slightly constricted at the septa, with a large globule in each cell, 14–19 × 3.5–4.5 μm (x¯ = 16.5 × 5 µm, n = 30). Sexual morph: Unknown.

Cultural characters: Conidia germinated on PDA within 12 h and germ tubes produced from both ends. Colonies reached 30 mm within four weeks at 26 °C, flat, circular, cottony, white from above, from below brown to dark brown in the center, white to pale brown around.

Material examined: China, Guizhou Province, Xingyi City, Qingshuihe Town, 8 August 2019, N.G. Liu, Q1 (GZAAS 21-0378, holotype; ex-type living culture, GZCC 21-0892).

Notes: Vamsapriya uniseptata is distinguishable by having smaller, 1-septate conidia, while other Vamsapriya species have elongated phragmoconidia. In the BLASTn search, the closest match of the ITS sequence of V. uniseptata is V. khunkonensis (MFLUCC 13-0497, MFLUCC 11-0475 (93.4%)), followed by V. indica (MFLUCC 12-0544 (91.7%)). The LSU sequence of V. uniseptata is V. indica (DLUCC:2062 (99.8%)) and V. khunkonensis (MFLUCC 11-0475 (99.7%)). Vamsapriya uniseptata can be distinguished from V. khunkonensis in the multigene phylogenetic analyses. The ITS region of V. indica (MFLUCC 13-0497) differs by 23 base pairs (527 bp without gaps). Based on distinct morphology and phylogeny, V. uniseptata is introduced as a novel taxon.

3.3. Other Accepted Genera in Vamsapriyaceae

Diabolocovidia Crous, Persoonia 44: 331 (2020)

Index Fungorum number: IF835401; Facesoffungi number: FoF09929.

Parasitic on leaves in terrestrial habitats. Mycelium composed of septate, branched, hyaline to pale brown hyphae. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous. Conidiophores solitary, erect, flexuous, mostly reduced to a terminal conidiogenous cell. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, terminal, subcylindrical to clavate, pale brown, smooth. Conidia catenate, acrogenous, brown, ellipsoid to obovoid, thin-walled, un-septate, verruculose [49]. Sexual morph: Unknown.

Type species: Diabolocovidia claustri Crous

Notes: Diabolocovidia is a monotypic genus introduced by Crous et al. [49] to accommodate Diabolocovidia claustri, which was isolated from leaves of Serenoa repens in the U.S.A. Diabolocovidia claustri is characterized by mononematous, micronematous conidiophores in Xylariaceae. In their phylogenetic analyses, Diabolocovidia is basal to Vamsapriya [49]. Diabolocovidia is the only genus without synnemata in Vamsapriyaceae.

Didymobotryum Sacc., Syll. fung. (Abellini) 4: 626 (1886)

Index Fungorum number: IF8009; Facesoffungi number: FoF09930.

Saprobic on decaying plants materials in terrestrial habitats. Colonies on natural substrate effuse, olivaceous to dark brown, velvety. Mycelium mostly immersed, composed of septate, branched, thick-walled, subhyaline hyphae. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous. Conidiophores macronematous, synnematous, erect, straight or broadly curved, dark brown, cylindrical, septate. Synnemata erect, rigid, dark brown, composed of compact parallel conidiophores. Conidiogenous cells monotretic, integrated, integrated or discrete, cylindrical to clavate, olivaceous brown to dark brown. Conidia catenate, dry, acrogenous, cylindrical, verrucose, 1-septate, slightly constricted at the septa, olivaceous brown to brown. Sexual morph: Unknown.

Type species: Didymobotryum rigidum (Berk. & Broome) Sacc.

Notes: Didymobotryum was introduced by Saccardo [55] typified by D. rigidum. Didymobotryum species have a worldwide distribution [56,57,58,59]. Six species are accepted in the Index Fungorum [37] but only D. rigidum has molecular data (ITS: LC228650, LSU: LC228707).

Podosporium Schwein., Trans. Am. phil. Soc., New Series 4(2): 278 (1832) [1834]

Index Fungorum number: IF9487; Facesoffungi number: FoF09931.

Saprobic on decaying plants materials in terrestrial habitats. Colonies on natural substrate effuse, brown, velvety. Mycelium mostly immersed, composed of septate, flexuous branched hyphae. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous. Conidiophores arranged in synnemata, brown, septate, sometimes branched at the apex. Synnemata erect, rigid, brown to dark. Conidiogenous cells mono- or polytretic, integrated or discrete, subulate or cylindrical, darkly pigmented. Conidia solitary, obclavate or bacilliform, multi-septate, brown to dark brown. Sexual morph: Unknown.

Type species: Podosporium rigidum Schwein.

Notes: Podosporium was introduced by Schweinitz [60] with P. rigidum as the type species. Since then, many Podosporium species have been discovered worldwide [60,61,62,63]. Most of them are saprobes in terrestrial habitats [60,61,62,63]. There are 67 species listed in the Index Fungorum [37] but no sequence data are available.

Tretophragmia Subram. & Natarajan, Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India, B, Biol. Sci. 39: 550 (1974) [1973]

Index Fungorum number: IF10265; Facesoffungi number: FoF09932.

Saprobic on plants materials in terrestrial habitats. Colonies on natural substrate effuse, dark, velvety. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous. Conidiophores macronematous, synnematous, brown, septate, erect, straight or broadly curved. Synnemata rigid, brown to dark, simple, erect, straight, consisting of a stalk and a capitate, broadened, fertile head. Conidiogenous cells monotretic, subulate or cylindrical, darkly pigmented. Conidia solitary, obclavate to fusiform or irregular in shape, straight, curved or bent, multi-septate, dark brown. Sexual morph: Unknown.

Type species: Tretophragmia nilgirensis (Subram.) Subram. & Natarajan

Notes: Tretophragmia was introduced in 1974. The asexual morph of Tretophragmia is similar to Didymobotryum, Podosporium and Vamsapriya, while no sexual morph is reported. Seifert et al. [53] treated Tretophragmia as a synonym of Podosporium. However, Tretophragmia is accepted in the Index Fungorum [37] and the MycoBank [64] as a separate genus. So far, only two species of Tretophragmia have been described [37] and no sequence data are available. Thus, based on morphology and until DNA sequences data are available, we regard this as a separate genus.

4. Discussion

In this study, three Vamsapriya species, V. chiangmaiensis, V. indica and V. uniseptata were collected from bamboo in terrestrial habitats. In our phylogenetic analyses of combined LSU, rpb2, tub2 and ITS sequence data, Diabolocovidia, Didymobotryum and Vamsapriya formed a distinct clade in Xylariales. Morphological comparison also shows their distinctiveness from other families in Xylariales. Therefore, we propose Vamsapriyaceae as a new family in Xylariales. The sexual morph of Vamsapriya differs from those of Xylariaceae in having hyaline apiospores [28,30]. It is noteworthy that the sexual morph of Vamsapriya is similar to Induratiaceae in having 8-spored asci with J+ apical ring and hyaline, apiospores, but Induratia (Induratiaceae) differs in having geniculosporium asexual morphs [34]. Apioclypea is morphologically similar to the sexual morph of Vamsapriya in having 8-spored, pedunculate, cylindrical asci and biseriate, fusiform, hyaline ascospores with a mucilaginous sheath, but its asexual morph is unknown [19,21].

Clypeosphaeriaceae and Induratiaceae are two other families that are phylogenetically related to Vamsapriyaceae, but they are distinct in morphology. Apioclypea, Aquasphaeria, Brunneiapiospora, Clypeosphaeria, Crassoascus, and Palmaria (Clypeosphaeriaceae) lack asexual morph descriptions and Diabolocovidia, Didymobotryum, Podosporium and Tretophragmia (Vamsapriyaceae) do not have sexual morph descriptions for the comparisons in Table 5 and Table 6.

Table 5.

Asexual morph comparison of the genera in Clypeosphaeriaceae, Induratiaceae and Vamsapriyaceae.

Family Genus Asexual Morph
Synnemata Conidiogenous Cells Conidia
Vamsapriyaceae Diabolocovidia Absent Monoblastic, subcylindrical to clavate, pale brown Catenate, acrogenous, brown, ellipsoid to obovoid, unseptate
Didymobotryum Present Monotretic, integrated, terminal, clavate to cylindrical, pale brown to brown Catenate, olivaceous brown to brown, cylindrical
Podosporium Present Mono- or polytretic, subulate or cylindrical, darkly pigmented Solitary, obclavate or bacilliform, multi-septate, brown to dark brown
Tretophragmia Present Monotretic, subulate or cylindrical, darkly pigmented Solitary, obclavate to fusiform or irregular in shape, multi-septate, dark brown
Vamsapriya Present Monotretic, clavate to cylindrical Catenate or solitary, acrogenous, cylindrical, oblong, fusiform or obclavate, brown to dark brown, septate
Induratiaceae Emarcea Absent Integrated, terminal, pale brown, forming a rachis with numerous small, pimple-like denticles Hyaline, smooth, falcate, granular, apex subobtuse, base truncate
Induratia Absent Terminal, solitary or sometimes two celled at the ends of branches, cylindrical, pale brown, bearing inconspicuous denticles Narrowly ellipsoidal to subglobose, hyaline

Table 6.

Sexual morph comparison of the genera in Clypeosphaeriaceae, Induratiaceae and Vamsapriyaceae.

Family Genus Sexual Morph
Asci Ascospores
Vamsapriyaceae Vamsapriya 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, short pedicellate, with J+ apical ring Apiosporous, fusiform to broad fusiform, hyaline, with sheath
Induratiaceae Emarcea 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, pedicellate, with J+ ring Overlapping uniseriate, long fusiform, hyaline, 2-celled
Induratia 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, short pedicellate, with a J+ apical ring Uniseriate, naviculate to ellipsoidal, mostly hyaline, constricted apiosporous
Clypeosphaeriaceae Aquasphaeria 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, with J- apical ring Biseriate, cylindrical and ovoid, hyaline
Apioclypea 8-spored, pedunculate, cylindrical, fissitunicate Biseriate, fusiform, hyaline, with sheath
Brunneiapiospora 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, pedicellate with J+ or J− ascal ring Hyaline to light brown apiospores with a mucilaginous sheath
Clypeosphaeria 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical to broadly cylindrical, pedicellate, with J+ or J− ascal ring Ellipsoidal to fusiform, unicellular to septate, hyaline to dark brown ascospores, sometimes with sheaths or appendages
Crassoascus 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical, short pedicellate, with J+ ring Bright brown to dark brown, multiseptate, fusiform ascospores, with hyaline refractive cap-like appendages at each end
Palmaria Cylindric to clavate, with a J− subapical ring Apiosporous, hyaline, 1-septate, obclavate, with a mucilaginous sheath

Diabolocovidia claustri was isolated on leaves of Serenoa repens by Crous et al. [49]. Although it has a close phylogenetic relationship with Vamsapriya, they are quite different in morphology. Diabolocovidia has micronematous rather than synnematous conidiophores, blastic rather than tretic conidiogenous cells, and ellipsoid to obovoid, aseptate conidia [49]. The phenomenon that Diabolocovidia mixes with synnematous and tretic genera like Didymobotryum and Vamsapriya reminds us of an example that Vanakripa with blastic conidiogenous resides in the phialidic genus Conioscypha [65]. These probably indicate the polyphyletic nature of some hyphomycetous groups. However, since D. claustri is the only species represented by one isolate in Diabolocovidia, we suggest using more collections to confirm its phylogenetic placement in the future.

When introducing Vamsapriya, Gawas and Bhat [26] pointed out Vamsapriya (conidia catenate, cylindrical to vermiform, phragmosporous) exhibits a combination of morphological characters of Didymobotryum (conidia catenate, ellipsoidal-cylindrical, didymosporous) [51,53,54] and Podosporium (conidia solitary, obclavate, phragmosporous) [56,61,63]. However, as more species are added to these three genera, such generic concepts based on conidial morphology have been dispelled. For example, V. uniseptata resembles species of Didymobotryum in having catenate, oblong, and 1-septate conidia, but it clusters with the type species of Vamsapriya, V. indica. Vamsapriya breviconidiophora and V. yunnana resemble Podosporium species in having obclavate, solitary, and multi-septate conidia, but they are grouped with V. aquatica, which has catenate, cylindrical to obclavate, multi-septate conidia in the phylogenetic tree. Either the authors did not follow the generic concepts strictly when introducing species, or these three genera are probably congeneric. We tend to infer the latter; however, the conclusion requires a detailed re-examination of herbarium specimens and molecular data.

Acknowledgments

We thank Shaun Pennycook for checking the nomenclature. We also thank the support of the Thailand Research Foundation. Ya-Ru Sun would like to thank Hong-Wei Shen for collecting the samples. Samantha C. Karunarathna is thanked for giving suggestions in this study. Kevin D. Hyde would like to thank the Thailand Research grant entitled “Impact of climate change on fungal diversity and biogeography in the Greater Mekong Subregion” (grant no: RDG6130001).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jof7110891/s1, Figure S1: Maximum likelihood (RAxML) tree based on ITS sequence data. The tree is rooted with Amphisphaeria sorbi (MFLUCC 13-0721) and A. thailandica (MFLU 18-0794). Figure S2: Maximum likelihood (RAxML) tree based on LSU sequence data. The tree is rooted with Amphisphaeria sorbi (MFLUCC 13-0721) and A. thailandica (MFLU 18-0794). Figure S3: Maximum likelihood (RAxML) tree based on tub2 sequence data. The tree is rooted with Amphisphaeria thailandica (MFLU 18-0794). Figure S4: Maximum likelihood (RAxML) tree based on rpb2 sequence data. The tree is rooted with Amphisphaeria thailandica (MFLU 18-0794).

Author Contributions

Methodology, Y.-R.S.; Software, Y.-R.S.; Supervision, R.S.J., K.D.H. and Y.W.; Writing—original draft, Y.-R.S.; Writing—review & editing, N.-G.L., M.C.S., R.S.J., K.D.H. and Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was funded by Guizhou Science Technology Department International Cooperation Basic project ([2018]5806), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31972222, 31560489), Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (111 Program, D20023), and Talent project of Guizhou Science and Technology Cooperation Platform [2017]5788-5, [2019]5641 and [2020]5001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Eriksson O.E., Winka K. Supraordinal taxa of Ascomycota. Myconet. 1997;1:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Smith G.J.D., Liew E.C., Hyde K.D. The Xylariales: A monophyletic order containing 7 families. Fungal Diversity. 2003;13:185–218. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stadler M. Importance of secondary metabolites in the Xylariaceae as parameters for assessment of their taxonomy, phylogeny, and functional biodiversity. Curr. Res. Environ. Appl. Mycol. 2011;1:75–133. doi: 10.5943/cream/1/2/1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.U’Ren J.M., Miadlikowska J., Zimmerman N.B., Lutzoni F., Stajich J.E., Arnold A.E. Contributions of North American endophytes to the phylogeny, ecology, and taxonomy of Xylariaceae (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota) Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2016;98:210–232. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Helaly S.E., Thongbai B., Stadler M. Diversity of biologically active secondary metabolites from endophytic and saprotrophic fungi of the ascomycete order Xylariales. Nat. Product Rep. 2018;35:992–1014. doi: 10.1039/C8NP00010G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Becker K., Stadler M. Recent progress in biodiversity research on the Xylariales and their secondary metabolism. J. Antibiot. 2021;74:1–23. doi: 10.1038/s41429-020-00376-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nannfeldt J.A. Studien uber die Morphologie und Systematik der nicht-lichenisierten inoperculaten Discomyceten. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis Scientiarum Upsaliensis Ser. IV. 1932;8:1–368. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Munk A. The system of the Pyrenomycetes. Dansk Botanisk Arkin. 1953;15:1–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Müller E., von Arx J.A. Die Gattungen der didymosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beiträge Kryptogamenflora Schweiz. 1962;11:1–922. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Muller E. The Fungi, an Advanced Treatise. Academic Press; London, UK: 1973. Pyrenomycetes: Meliolales, coronophorales, sphaeriales. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wehmeyer L.E. The Pyrenomycetous fungi. Mycol. Mem. 1975;6:1–250. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Barr M.E. Prodromus to nonlichenized, pyrenomycetous members of class Hymenoascomycetes. Mycotaxon. 1990;39:43–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hawksworth D.L., Kirk P.M., Sutton B.C., Pegler D.N. Ainsworth and Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi. 8th ed. CAB International; Oxon, UK: 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kang J.C., Kong R.Y.C., Hyde K.D. Studies on the Amphisphaeriales 1. Amhisphaeriaceae (sensu stricto) and its phylogenetic relationships inferred from 5.8S rDNA and ITS2 sequences. Fungal Divers. 1998;1:147–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kang J.C., Kong R.Y.C., Hyde K.D. Phylogeny of Amhisphaeriaceae (sensu stricto) and related taxa revisited based on nrDNA sequences. Mycotaxon. 2002;81:321–330. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Eriksson O.E., Baral H.O., Currah R.S., Hansen K., Kurtzman C.P., Rambold G., Laessoe T. Outline of Ascomycota—2003. Myconet. 2003;9:1–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lumbsch H.T., Huhndorf S.M. Myconet volume 14 part one. Outline of ascomycota—2009. Fieldiana Life Earth Sci. 2010;1:1–922. doi: 10.3158/1557.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Senanayake I.C., Maharachchikumbura S.S.N., Hyde K.D., Bhat J.D., Jones E.B.G., McKenzie E.H.C., Dai D.Q., Daranagama D.A., Dayarathne M.C., Goonasekara I.D., et al. Towards unraveling relationships in Xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes) Fungal Divers. 2015;73:73–144. doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0340-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hyde K.D., Norphanphoun C., Maharachchikumbura S.S.N., Bhat D.J., Jones E.B.G., Bundhun D., Chen Y.J., Bao D.F., Boonmee S., Calabon M.S., et al. Refined families of Sordariomycetes. Mycosphere. 2020;11:305–1059. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hyde K.D., Dong Y., Phookamsak R., Jeewon R., Bhat D.J., Jones E.B.G., Liu N.G., Abeywickrama P.D., Mapook A., Wei D.P., et al. Fungal diversity notes 1151–1276: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2020;100:5–277. doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00439-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maharachchikumbura S.S.N., Hyde K.D., Jones E.B.G., McKenzie E.H.C., Bhat J.D., Dayarathne M.C., Huang S.K., Norphanphoun C., Senanayake I.C., Perera R.H., et al. Families of Sordariomycetes. Fungal Divers. 2016;79:1–317. doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0369-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fröhlich J., Hyde K.D. Palm Microfungi. Fungal Divers. Res. Ser. 2000;3:1–393. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Daranagama D.A., Camporesi E., Liu X.Z., Bhat D.J., Chamyuang S., Bahkali A.H., Stadler M., Hyde K.D. Tristratiperidium microsporum gen. et sp. nov. (Xylariales) on dead leaves of Arundo plinii. Mycol. Prog. 2015;15:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s11557-015-1151-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Crous P.W., Wingfield M.J., Burgess T.I., Hardy G.E.S.J., Crane C., Barrett S., Cano-Lira J.F., le Roux J.J., Thangavel R., Guarro J., et al. Fungal Planet description sheetS: 469–557. Persoonia. 2016;37:218–403. doi: 10.3767/003158516X694499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fiuza P.O., Silva C., Santos T.A.B., Raja H., Castañeda-Ruiz R.F., Gusmão L.F.P. Roselymyces, a new asexual genus of the Xylariales (Ascomycota) from Brazil. Sydowia. 2018;70:59–65. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gawas P., Bhat D.J. Vamsapriya indica gen. et sp. nov., a bambusicolous, synnematous fungus from India. Mycotaxon. 2005;94:149–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dai D.Q., Bahkali A.H., Li Q.R., Bhat D.J., Wijayawardene N.N., Li W.J., Chukeatirote E., Zhao R.L., Xu J.C., Hyde K.D. Vamsapriya (Xylariaceae) redescribed, with two new species and molecular sequence data. Cryptogamie Mycologie. 2014;35:339–357. doi: 10.7872/crym.v35.iss4.2014.339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dai D.Q., Phookamsak R., Wijayawardene N.N., Li W.J., Bhat D.J., Xu J.C., Taylor J.E., Hyde K.D., Chukeatirote E. Bambusicolous fungi. Fungal Divers. 2017;82:1–105. doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0367-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Castañeda-Ruiz R.F., Zhang X.G., Li D.W., Gusmão L.F.P., Pérez-Martínez S., Sosa D. Notes on Vamsapriya and V. camagueyensis comb. nov. Mycotaxon. 2017;132:553–557. doi: 10.5248/132.553. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hyde K.D., Norphanphoun C., Abreu V.P., Bazzicalupo A., Thilini C.K.W., Clericuzio M., Dayarathne M.C., Dissanayake A.J., Ekanayaka A.H., He M.Q., et al. Fungal diversity notes 603–708: Taxonomic and phylogenetic notes on genera and species. Fungal Divers. 2017;87:1–235. doi: 10.1007/s13225-017-0391-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jiang H.B., Phookamsak R., Bhat D.J., Khan S., Bahkali A., Elgorban A.M., Hyde K.D. Vamsapriya yunnana, a new species of Vamsapriya (Xylariaceae; Xylariales) associated with bamboo from Yunnan; China. Phytotaxa. 2018;356:61–70. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.356.1.5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bao D.F., Hyde K.D., McKenzie E.H., Jeewon R., Su H.Y., Nalumpang S., Luo Z.L. Biodiversity of Lignicolous Freshwater Hyphomycetes from China and Thailand and Description of Sixteen Species. J. Fungi. 2021;7:669. doi: 10.3390/jof7080669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ling Y., Li H.H., Xia J.W., Zhang X.G., Li Z. Vamsapriya jinniuensis sp. nov.; and a first record of Garnaudia elegans from southern China. Mycotaxon. 2018;133:367–372. doi: 10.5248/133.367. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Samarakoon M.C., Thongbai B., Hyde K.D., Brönstrup M., Beutling U., Lambert C., Miller A.N., Liu J.K., Promputtha I., Stadler M. Elucidation of the life cycle of the endophytic genus Muscodor and its transfer to Induratia in Induratiaceae fam. nov.; based on a polyphasic taxonomic approach. Fungal Divers. 2020;101:177–210. doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00443-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Senanayake I., Rathnayake A., Marasinghe D., Calabon M., Gentekaki E., Lee H.B., Hurdeal V.G., Pem D., Dissanayake L.S., Wijesinghe S.N., et al. Morphological approaches in studying fungi: Collection; Examination; Isolation; Sporulation and Preservation. Mycosphere. 2020;11:2678–2754. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jayasiri S.C., Hyde K.D., Ariyawansa H.A., Bha T.J., Buyck B., Cai L., Dai Y.C., Abd-Elsalam K.A., Ertz D., Hidayat I., et al. The Faces of Fungi database: Fungal names linked with morphology; Phylogeny and human impacts. Fungal Divers. 2015;74:3–18. doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0351-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Index Fungorum. [(accessed on 6 September 2021)]. Available online: http://www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp.
  • 38.Vilgalys R., Hester M. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J. Bacteriol. 1990;172:4238–4246. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S., Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protoc. Guide Methods Appl. 1990;18:315–322. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Katoh K., Standley D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Larsson A. AliView: A fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:3276–3278. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vaidya G., Lohman D.J., Meier R. SequenceMatrix: Concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics. 2011;27:171–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2010.00329.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A., Huelsenbeck J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 2012;61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nylander J. MrModeltest (Version 2.2) Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University; Uppsala, Sweden: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Trifinopoulos J., Nguyen L.-T., von Haeseler A., Minh B.Q. W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W232–W235. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Swofford D.L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods) Sinauer Associates; Sunderland, MA, USA: 2002. Version 4.0 b10. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hillis D.M., Bull J.J. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 1993;42:182–192. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/42.2.182. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rambaut A. FigTree. Version 1.4.2. University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh, UK: 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Crous P.W., Wingfield M.J., Chooi Y.H., Gilchrist C.L., Lacey E., Pitt J.I., Roets F., Swart W.J., Cano-Lira J.F., Valenzuela-Lopez N. Fungal Planet description sheets:1042–1111. Pers. Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi. 2020;44:301. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2020.44.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Seifert K. Contributions toward a mycobiota of Indonesia: Synnematous hyphomycetes. Mem. N. Y. Bot. Gard. 1990;59:109–154. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhang Y.D., Ma J., Ma L.G., Zhang X.G. A new species of Podosporium and a new record from southern China. Mycotaxon. 2010;114:401–405. doi: 10.5248/114.401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang J.Y., Zhang K., Yang C.L., Xia J.W., Ma Y.R., Gao J.M., Li X.Y., Zhang X.G., Cai Y.M. Podosporium bacilliforme sp. nov. and a first record of Phaeoblastophora peckii from southern China. Mycotaxon. 2016;131:841–846. doi: 10.5248/131.841. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Seifert K., Morgan-Jones G., Gams W., Kendrick B. The Genera of Hyphomycetes. CBS-KNA W Fungal Biodiversity Centre; Utrecht, The Netherlands: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Jeewon R., Hyde K.D. Establishing species boundaries and new taxa among fungi: Recommendations to resolve taxonomic ambiguities. Mycosphere. 2016;7:1669–1677. doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/7/11/4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Saccardo P.A. Sylloge Hyphomycetum. Sylloge Fungorum. 1886;4:807. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Berkeley M.J., Broome C.E. Enumeration of the fungi of Ceylon. Part II; containing the remainder of the hymenomycetes; with the remaining established tribes of fungi. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 1873;14:29–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1873.tb00301.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ellis M.B. Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. Commonwealth Mycological Institute; Kew, UK: 1971. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhuang W.Y. Higher Fungi of Tropical China. Mycotaxon Ltd.; Ithaca, NY, USA: 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang X.M., Liu G.N., Chen S.S., Du X.F. Records of Beltrania rhombica and Didymobotryum rigidum from China. Mycotaxon. 2017;132:525–529. doi: 10.5248/132.525. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Von Schweinitz L.D. Synopsis fungorum in America boreali media degentium. Trans. Am. Philos. Soc. 1832;4:141–316. doi: 10.2307/1004834. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ciferri R. Observations on meliolicolous hyphales from Santo Domingo. Sydowia. 1955;9:302. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Mercado S. Nuevos e interesantes hifomicetes enterblásticos de Cuba. Acta Bot. Cuba. 1983;16:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Crous P.W., Wingfield M.J., Kendrick W.B. Foliicolous dematiaceous hyphomycetes from Syzygium cordatum. Can. J. Bot. 1995;73:224–234. doi: 10.1139/b95-025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mycobank. [(accessed on 6 September 2021)]. Available online: https://www.mycobank.org/
  • 65.Yang H., Dong W., Yu X.D., Bhat D.J., Boonmee S., Zhang H. Four freshwater dematiaceous hyphomycetes in Sordariomycetes with two new species of Parafuscosporella. Phytotaxa. 2020;44:19–34. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.441.1.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Journal of Fungi are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES