Skip to main content
Nanomaterials logoLink to Nanomaterials
. 2021 Oct 20;11(11):2766. doi: 10.3390/nano11112766

Magnon Torque Transferred into a Magnetic Insulator through an Antiferromagnetic Insulator

Zhiren Chen 1,, Zehan Chen 1,, Xiaotian Zhao 2, Baoshan Cui 3, Hongnan Zheng 1, Lin Liu 1, Wei Jia 1, Tianhui Li 1, Zhixiang Ye 1, Mingxia Qiu 1, Ning Wang 1,*, Lei Ma 1,*, Hongyu An 1,*
Editor: Jose Maria De Teresa
PMCID: PMC8625957  PMID: 34835536

Abstract

Electrical spin-orbit torque (SOT) in magnetic insulators (MI) has been intensively studied due to its advantages in spin-orbitronic devices with ultralow energy consumption. However, the magnon torque in the MIs, which has the potential to further lower the energy consumption, still remains elusive. In this work, we demonstrate the efficient magnon torque transferred into an MI through an antiferromagnetic insulator. By fabricating a Pt/NiO/Tm3Fe5O12 heterostructure with different NiO thicknesses, we have systematically investigated the evolution of the transferred magnon torque. We show that the magnon torque efficiency transferred through the NiO into the MI can retain a high value (∼50%), which is comparable to the previous report for the magnon torque transferred into the metallic magnet. Our study manifests the feasibility of realizing the pure magnon-based spin-orbitronic devices with ultralow energy consumption and high efficiency.

Keywords: magnon torque, magnetic insulator, antiferromagnetic insulator, spin-orbit torque

1. Introduction

Discovering novel phenomena and functionalities originating from the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) is an emerging direction in spin-orbitronics [1,2,3,4]. In the spin-orbitronic devices, a pure spin current is generated from a charge current through the SOC, defined as electrical spin current, which can be transferred into a magnet, and works as electrical spin-orbit torque (SOT) to effectively manipulate its magnetization (see Figure 1a) [5,6,7]. By now, the electrical SOT has been intensively studied due to its essential role in the spin-orbitronic technology [8,9,10]. Recently, another class of the spin current, defined as magnon current, has emerged and attracted much attention [11,12,13,14]. For the magnon current, the spin angular momentum is carried by the precessing spin moments, which does not request movement of the electrons (see Figure 1b). Therefore, the Joule heat dissipation can be drastically reduced in the magnon-based spin-orbitronic devices. Very recently, Wang et al. reported the successful observation of the magnon torque transferred into a metallic magnet through an antiferromagnetic insulator, and they realized the magnetization switching of the metallic magnet by the magnon torque [13]. On the other hand, it has been known that the electrical SOT can be transferred into a magnetic insulator (MI) and drive its magnetization [15,16,17,18]. Therefore, it is natural to ask whether the magnon torque can be efficiently transferred into the MI, since it may provide a practical approach to further lower the energy dissipation in the spin-orbitronic devices. To study the magnon torque in the MI is important in both fundamental and practical aspects of spin-orbitronics.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic of the MI magnetization manipulated by (a) the electrical SOT via the electrical spin current Js, and (b) the magnon torque via the magnon current JM.

In this work, we study the magnon torque transferred into the Tm3Fe5O12 (TmIG), a typical MI. By fabricating the Pt/NiO/TmIG heterostruture with different NiO thicknesses, we systematically investigate the evolution of the transferred magnon torque. We show that the magnon torque efficiency transferred through the NiO into the MI can retain a high value, which is comparable to the previous report for the magnon torque transferred into the metallic magnet.

2. Materials and Methods

For the sample fabrication, a 4-nm-thick TmIG film was deposited on Gd3Sc2Ga3O12 (GSGG) (111) single crystal substrates at 700 °C by magnetron sputtering. After cooling down to the room temperature, NiO films with thicknesses from 0 to 30 nm were deposited on the TmIG surface, and then a 4-nm-thick Pt film was deposited on the NiO surface. All the films were deposited without breaking the vacuum. The base pressure in the chamber before deposition was better than 1 × 106 Pa, and the deposition pressure was 0.4 Pa. The film thickness was controlled by the deposition time with a precalibrated deposition rate. All the measurements were conducted at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

The anomalous Hall effect (AHE) was measured by patterning the Pt/NiO/TmIG films into Hall bar devices, as shown in Figure 2a. A constant charge current was injected into the films along the x-axis, and the Hall voltage was measured by sweeping an external magnetic field Hz along the z-axis. Figure 2b exhibits the AHE resistance RH curves of the Pt (4 nm)/NiO (t nm)/TmIG (4 nm) devices with different NiO thicknesses. In the case of t = 0 nm, RH is obtained as about 1.7 mΩ. By increasing t to 0.6 nm, RH drastically decreases to about 0.5 mΩ. In the Pt/TmIG heterostructure, the anomalous Hall signal attributes to both the proximity-induced ferromagnetism of Pt and the spin current [19]. Therefore, although the TmIG is an insulator, the proximity-induced ferromagnetic layer in Pt can generate an AHE signal as normal ferromagnetic conductors do. Simultaneously, the spin current via the nonzero imaginary part of the spin-mixing conductance can also generate an AHE-like signal at the Pt/TmIG interface. By inserting the 0.6-nm-thick NiO layer, the proximity effect is eliminated. Furthermore, the ultrathin NiO layer without antiferromagnetic ordering only acts as an insulator, which prevents the spin transportation from the Pt to the TmIG layer. Both effects result in this drastic decrease of the AHE resistance. However, by further increasing the NiO thickness, although the proximity effect is completely eliminated, we still can observe the AHE signal. This is because, by increasing the NiO thickness, the long-range antiferromagnetic order restores, and then the magnon current can transport through the antiferromagnetic NiO layer [13]. As shown in Figure 2c, the AHE resistance curve of the Pt (4 nm)/NiO (10 nm)/TmIG (4 nm) device unambiguously confirms the magnon current transferred into the TmIG layer through the NiO layer.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Schematic of the setup for the AHE resistance measurement. (b) AHE resistance curves of the Pt (4 nm)/NiO (t nm)/TmIG (4 nm) devices with different NiO thicknesses. (c) AHE resistance curve of the Pt (4 nm)/NiO (10 nm)/TmIG (4 nm) device.

In the following, we measure the damping-like torque-induced effective field Hzeff in the Pt (4 nm)/NiO (t nm)/TmIG (4 nm) devices with different NiO thicknesses. An external magnetic field along the z-axis Hz was swept to measure the AHE with a constant external magnetic field along the x-axis Hx, as shown in Figure 2a. In the Ne´el-type domain walls, the damping-like torque works as an additional effective field along the z-axis, which favors one type of the domain [20,21]. This results in a horizontal shift of the AHE hysteresis loop. Figure 3a–c presents typical shifted hysteresis loops of the devices with different NiO thicknesses. By applying a positive current, the hysteresis loop shifts to the left, which is vice versa for a negative current. By measuring the current-induced shift Hzeff, the magnitude of the damping-like torque can be determined. Here, we define the damping-like SOT generation efficiency χ as χ = Hzeff/Je, where Je is the applied current density. The corresponding Hx dependence of χ are summarized in Figure 3d–f, respectively. First, χ gradually increases with Hx and then saturates at a large in-plane field Hxsat. Hxsat represents the minimum field to overcome the effective Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI) field HDMI. Therefore, we can obtain the maximum SOT efficiency χsat = 2.1 × 1010 Oe A1 m2 and HDMI ≈ 120 Oe for NiO = 0 nm. For NiO = 1.8 nm, χsat = 0.75 × 1010 Oe A1 m2 and HDMI ≈ 100 Oe are obtained. For NiO = 3 nm, χsat = 1.1 × 1010 Oe A1 m2 and HDMI ≈ 125 Oe are obtained. This result shows that χsat changes nonmonotonically with the NiO thickness.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

AHE resistance curves of the Pt (4 nm)/NiO (t nm)/TmIG (4 nm) devices by sweeping Hz with (a) t = 0 nm and Hx = 200 Oe, (b) t = 1.8 nm and Hx = 500 Oe, (c) t = 3 nm and Hx = 200 Oe. Slight vertical offsets for both AHE loops are introduced for clarity. Corresponding Hx dependence of the SOT efficiency χ for (d) t = 0 nm, (e) t = 1.8 nm and (f) t = 3 nm. χsat is the maximum SOT efficiency, and HDMI is the field that χ saturates.

Figure 4 summarizes the NiO thickness dependence of χsat. It can be seen that χsat drastically decreases by increasing the NiO thickness to 1.8 nm. In this range, the antiferromagnetic ordering is weak due to the ultrathin NiO thickness, and the magnon torque only plays a minor role. The SOT in this range is due to the electron spin tunneling effect through the insulator. Above 1.8 nm, χsat starts to increase, which unambiguously confirms the presence of the magnon torque, since the magnons in the NiO are the only spin-angular-momentum carriers. We also fabricated and measured the Pt (4 nm)/SiO2 (t nm)/TmIG (4 nm) devices for comparison. When SiO2 thickness is below 1.8 nm, it shows a similar decrease due to the electron spin tunneling effect, and no signal can be detected above 1.8 nm. For the Pt (4 nm)/NiO (t nm)/TmIG (4 nm) devices, a peak value of χsat is obtained at t = 3 nm, which is about 50% of that for the Pt/TmIG device. Wang et al. reported the magnon torque transferred into the metallic magnet, and the peak value is about 45% of that for the control devices without NiO [13]. Our study demonstrates that the magnon torque transferred trough the NiO into the MI can also retain a high efficiency. By further increasing the NiO thickness up to 10 nm, the magnon torque generation can still be detected, although it gradually decreases due to the energy dissipation caused by magnon–magnon and magnon–phonon coupling. A previous study demonstrates that the spin fluctuation in the NiO layer can increase the spin conductivity [22]. Since the spin fluctuation can be enhanced near the Ne´el temperature, an enhancement of the SOT generation can be expected near the Ne´el temperature. In our study, in order to determine the Ne´el temperature, we measured the temperature dependence of the coercivity Hc for t = 1.8, 3 and 4.2 nm, respectively. When the temperature is below the Ne´el temperature, an abrupt enhancement is expected to occur due to the presence of the ferromagnetic-antiferromagnetic interaction [23]. As shown in the inset of Figure 4, the Ne´el temperature is about 250 K for t = 1.8 nm, 300 K for t = 3 nm and 325 K for t = 4.2 nm. Therefore, the sharp peak of χsat at t = 3 nm is attributed to the enhancement of the spin fluctuations in the NiO layer.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The dependence of the maximum SOT efficiency χsat on the NiO thickness. Pt (4 nm)/SiO2 (t nm)/TmIG (4 nm) devices were measured for comparison. The inset shows the temperature dependence of the coercivity Hc for the Pt (4 nm)/SiO2 (t nm)/TmIG (4 nm) devices.

We notice that in Wang et al.’s study, the peak value of the magnon torque efficiency appears when the NiO thickness is 25 nm, which is thicker than that in our study (3 nm) [13]. This could be caused by the different NiO quality grown with different deposition conditions.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have demonstrated the magnon torque transferred into an MI through an antiferromagnetic insulator. By fabricating the Pt/NiO/TmIG heterostructure with different NiO thicknesses, we have systematically investigated the evolution of the magnon torque efficiency. We show that the magnon torque transferred through the NiO into the MI can retain about 50%, which is comparable to the previous report for the magnon torque transferred into the metallic magnet. Our study manifests the feasibility of realizing the pure magnon-based spintronic devices with ultralow energy consumption and high efficiency.

Author Contributions

Investigation, formal analysis, data curation, Z.C. (Zhiren Chen), Z.C. (Zehan Chen), X.Z., B.C., H.Z., L.L., W.J., T.L. and Z.Y.; conceptualization, methodology, supervision, M.Q., N.W., L.M. and H.A.; writing—original draft preparation, H.A.; writing—review and editing, M.Q., N.W., L.M. and H.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2019A1515110230, 2021A1515012055), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52001215), the Featured Innovation Project of the Educational Commission of Guangdong Province of China (Grant No. 2019KTSCX203), Project of Youth Innovative Talents in Higher Education Institutions of Guangdong (Grant No. 2020KQNCX069), Natural Science Foundation of Top Talent of SZTU (Grant No. 2019208, 2019106101006, 2019010801008), Special Funds for the Cultivation of Guangdong College Students’ Scientific and Technological Innovation (Climbing Program Special Funds pdjh2021b0448).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the data present in this paper will be made available upon reasonable request. Please contact the corresponding author for further information.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Sinova J., Valenzuela S.O., Wunderlich J., Back C.H., Jungwirth T. Spin Hall effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2015;87:1213–1260. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.1213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jungwirth T., Wunderlich J., Olejnik K. Spin Hall effect devices. Nat. Mater. 2012;11:382–390. doi: 10.1038/nmat3279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Manchon A., Koo H.C., Nitta J., Frolov S.M., Duine R.A. New perspectives for Rashba spin-orbit coupling. Nat. Mater. 2015;14:871–882. doi: 10.1038/nmat4360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Soumyanarayanan A., Reyren N., Fert A., Panagopoulos C. Emergent phenomena induced by spin–orbit coupling at surfaces and interfaces. Nature. 2016;539:509–517. doi: 10.1038/nature19820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Manchon A., Železnỳ J., Miron I.M., Jungwirth T., Sinova J., Thiaville A., Garello K., Gambardella P. Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2019;91:035004. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.035004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liu L., Pai C.F., Li Y., Tseng H.W., Ralph D.C., Buhrman R.A. Spin-torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum. Science. 2012;336:555–558. doi: 10.1126/science.1218197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miron I.M., Garello K., Gaudin G., Zermatten P.J., Costache M.V., Auffret S., Bandiera S., Rodmacq B., Schuhl A., Gambardella P. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection. Nature. 2011;476:189–193. doi: 10.1038/nature10309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Garello K., Miron I.M., Avci C.O., Freimuth F., Mokrousov Y., Blügel S., Auffret S., Boulle O., Gaudin G., Gambardella P. Symmetry and magnitude of spin–orbit torques in ferromagnetic heterostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013;8:587. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2013.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fan X., Wu J., Chen Y., Jerry M.J., Zhang H., Xiao J.Q. Observation of the nonlocal spin-orbital effective field. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:1–7. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim J., Sinha J., Hayashi M., Yamanouchi M., Fukami S., Suzuki T., Mitani S., Ohno H. Layer thickness dependence of the current-induced effective field vector in Ta∣CoFeB∣MgO. Nat. Mater. 2013;12:240–245. doi: 10.1038/nmat3522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Takei S., Moriyama T., Ono T., Tserkovnyak Y. Antiferromagnet-mediated spin transfer between a metal and a ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92:020409. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.020409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rezende S., Rodríguez-Suárez R., Azevedo A. Diffusive magnonic spin transport in antiferromagnetic insulators. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:054412. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.054412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang Y., Zhu D., Yang Y., Lee K., Mishra R., Go G., Oh S.H., Kim D.H., Cai K., Liu E., et al. Magnetization switching by magnon-mediated spin torque through an antiferromagnetic insulator. Science. 2019;366:1125–1128. doi: 10.1126/science.aav8076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Suresh A., Bajpai U., Petrović M.D., Yang H., Nikolić B.K. Magnon-versus Electron-Mediated Spin-Transfer Torque Exerted by Spin Current across an Antiferromagnetic Insulator to Switch the Magnetization of an Adjacent Ferromagnetic Metal. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2021;15:034089. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.034089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Avci C.O., Quindeau A., Pai C.F., Mann M., Caretta L., Tang A.S., Onbasli M.C., Ross C.A., Beach G.S. Current-induced switching in a magnetic insulator. Nat. Mater. 2017;16:309–314. doi: 10.1038/nmat4812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shao Q., Tang C., Yu G., Navabi A., Wu H., He C., Li J., Upadhyaya P., Zhang P., Razavi S.A., et al. Role of dimensional crossover on spin-orbit torque efficiency in magnetic insulator thin films. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:3612. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06059-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Guo C., Wan C., Zhao M., Wu H., Fang C., Yan Z., Feng J., Liu H., Han X. Spin-orbit torque switching in perpendicular Y3Fe5O12/Pt bilayer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019;114:192409. doi: 10.1063/1.5098033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu L., Fan Z., Chen Z., Chen Z., Ye Z., Zheng H., Zeng Q., Jia W., Li S., Wang N., et al. Spin–orbit torques in heavy metal/ferrimagnetic insulator bilayers near compensation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021;119:052401. doi: 10.1063/5.0057741. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tang C., Sellappan P., Liu Y., Xu Y., Garay J.E., Shi J. Anomalous Hall hysteresis in Tm3Fe5O12/Pt with strain-induced perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;94:140403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.140403. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pai C.F., Mann M., Tan A.J., Beach G.S. Determination of spin torque efficiencies in heterostructures with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:144409. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.144409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Finley J., Liu L. Spin-orbit-torque efficiency in compensated ferrimagnetic cobalt-terbium alloys. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2016;6:054001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.054001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Qiu Z., Li J., Hou D., Arenholz E., N’Diaye A.T., Tan A., Uchida K.I., Sato K., Okamoto S., Tserkovnyak Y., et al. Spin-current probe for phase transition in an insulator. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12670. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pan C., Gao T., Harumoto T., Zhang Z., Nakamura Y., Shi J. Asymmetry in magnetic behavior caused by superposition of unidirectional and four-fold magnetic anisotropies in CoPt/FeMn bilayers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019;480:148–153. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the data present in this paper will be made available upon reasonable request. Please contact the corresponding author for further information.


Articles from Nanomaterials are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES