Abstract
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) has been an effective target for insecticide development which is a very important aspect of the global fight against insect-borne diseases. The drastic reduction in the sensitivity of insects to AChE-targeting insecticides like organophosphates and carbamates have increased the need for insecticides of natural origin. In this study, we used Drosophila melanogaster as a model to investigate the insecticidal and AChE inhibitory potentials of Cymbopogon citratus and its bioactive compounds. Flies were exposed to 100 and 200 mg/mL C. citratus leaf extract for a 3-h survival assay followed by 45 min exposure for negative geotaxis and biochemical assays. Molecular docking analysis of 45 bioactive compounds of the plant was conducted against Drosophila melanogaster AChE (DmAChE). Exposure to C. citratus significantly reduced the survival rate of flies throughout the exposure period and this was accompanied by a significant decrease in percentage negative geotaxis, AChE activity, catalase activity, total thiol level and a significant increase in glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity. The bioactive compounds of C. citratus showed varying levels of binding affinities for the enzyme. (+)-Cymbodiacetal scored highest (−9.407 kcal/mol) followed by proximadiol (−8.253 kcal/mol), geranylacetone (−8.177 kcal/mol), and rutin (−8.148 kcal/mol). The four compounds occupied the same binding pocket and interacted with important active site amino acid residues as the co-crystallized ligand (1qon). These compounds could be responsible for the insecticidal and AChE inhibitory potentials of C. citratus and they could be further explored in the development of AChE-targeting insecticides.
Keywords: Cymbopogon citratus, Acetylcholinesterase, Drosophila melanogaster, Binding affinity
Highlights
-
•
Cymbopogon citratus reduced the AChE activity, catalase activity, total thiol level in Drosophilia melanogaster.
-
•
The bioactive compounds of Cymbopogon citratus displayed considerable binding affinities for Drosophila melanogaster AChE and the four top-scoring compounds are (+)-Cymbodiacetal, proximadiol, geranylacetone, and rutin.
-
•
(+)-Cymbodiacetal showed the highest binding affinity to AChE (DmAChE).
1. Introduction
Acetylcholinesterase is a cholinergic enzyme that catalyses the breakdown of acetylcholine to acetic acid and choline, thereby terminating nerve transmission at the synapses [1]. Acetylcholine is the major neurotransmitter found in the central nervous system (CNS) of both vertebrates and invertebrates alongside other transmitters, and the regulation of its activity by AChE-catalysed hydrolysis is essential for the normal functioning and/or survival of these animals. Due to its involvement in the termination of impulse transmission in insects [2], AChE has functioned as the target of many insecticides including organophosphates and carbamates [3]. Inhibition of AChE by these insecticides causes the accumulation of acetylcholine in the synapses, making acetylcholine receptors to be permanently open and resulting in some toxicological outcomes [1,4].
The cholinergic stimulation induced by an AChE inhibitor (AChEI) may cause hyperactivity of excitable tissues, leading to fatal consequences like muscle paralysis, coma, and death. The toxicity of AChEIs is also associated with oxidative stress due to the induction of some noncholinergic activities like the overproduction of oxygen/nitrogen-derived free radicals and alterations in the antioxidant defence system [5]. The levels and activities of some components of the antioxidant defence system are altered thereby exposing the insects to the toxic effects of the chemical [5,6].
Several AChE-targeting insecticides have however become less effective due to the increasing resistance of insects to these chemicals. The development of resistance has altered the effective doses of insecticides and consequently increased human exposure to the toxic adverse effects of the chemicals [7]. These and other factors, such as environmental pollution, have led to the use of natural methods for insect control. Insect repellent plants are considered safe and environmentally friendly alternatives for controlling insects, which are vectors to several infectious human diseases. Some of these plants are sometimes used as ornamental plants around residential houses to repel insects and one of such plants is Cymbopogon citratus (lemongrass) [8,9].
Lemongrass is a perennial plant that grows in tropical and savannah regions, and it is used in traditional medicine for the treatment of some disease conditions due to their antimalarial, antimicrobial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, sedative, antipyretic and antispasmodic effects [9]. These activities are as a result of several bioactive components the plant, many of which have been isolated and characterized [10,11]. Some essential oil components of lemongrass are reported to be lethal to insects, probably through their ability to penetrate the system of insects via the respiratory tract or through direct contact with the body of the insects [12] to target specific enzymes of the insect's nervous system [13]. Lemongrass has been shown to have the insecticidal and insect-repellent ability towards several insects, including mosquitoes [14], houseflies [15], sand flies [16] and fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) [17], hence, it might be a source of effective and non-toxic natural insecticides. Therefore, using Drosophila melanogaster as a model insect, we investigated the insecticidal and AChE inhibitory potentials of Cymbopogon citratus and its bioactive compounds through in vivo and in silico approaches. The effects of Cymbopogon citratus exposure on the survival rate, negative geotactic ability, DmAChE activity and some biochemical parameters of oxidative stress (total thiol, catalase and glutathione-S-transferase) in the fruit fly were determined. In the in silico study, previously characterized bioactive compounds of Cymbopogon citratus were screened for inhibitory activity against DmAChE through molecular docking analysis to identify possible AChEIs among the compounds.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Plant material-collection and identification
Lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus) plant was obtained from Abuja, Nigeria and was authenticated at the National Institute for Pharmaceutical Research and Development (NIPRD), Abuja, a voucher specimen with the number NIPRD/H/7041 was deposited at the institute. The samples were thoroughly washed under running water after which they were air-dried for 3 weeks at room temperature. The leaves were powdered using an electric blender and the powdered sample was used for the extraction process.
2.2. Extraction
Fifty grammes (50 g) of the powdered sample of lemongrass was placed in a 500 mL conical flask and 320 mL of 70% Ethanol was poured into the flask. The flask was allowed to shake for 69 h with an orbital shaker after which the extract was filtered out into a 50 mL beaker using a muslin cloth followed by Whatman filter paper. The filtrate was placed in a water bath at 78°C to remove the ethanol, leaving only the extract.
2.3. Drosophila melanogaster stock culture
Drosophila melanogaster (Canton-S strain) was obtained from the Drosophila Laboratory of the Department of Biochemistry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. The flies were maintained and reared on a normal diet made up of cornmeal medium containing, agar-agar, 1% w/v brewer's yeast and 0.08% v/w nipargin at 37 °C under 12 h dark/light cycle conditions.
2.4. Insecticidal assay of Cymbopogon citratus leaf extract in Drosophila melanogaster
About 20 flies of both genders, aged 3–5 days were transferred into treatment vials containing cotton wool soaked in 200 μL of 100 and 200 mg/mL Cymbopogon citratus leaf extract dissolved in 70% ethanol. For the control flies, the cotton wool was soaked in 200 μL of 70% ethanol only. The flies were exposed to these treatments for 3 h, and all experiments were carried out in triplicate. The number of live and dead flies in each vial were recorded every 30 min for 3 h and the survival rate was expressed as the percentage of live flies [18].
2.5. Negative geotaxis
A negative Geotaxis assay was performed as previously described by Johnson et al. [1]. The flies were treated with the extract as described above for 45 min after which they were transferred into empty treatment vials. The vials were tapped at the bottom and the number of flies that crossed the 6 cm line within 10 s was recorded.
2.6. Preparation of supernatant for biochemical assays
Flies exposed to Cymbopogon citratus leaf extract for 45 min, as well as the control flies, were immobilized in ice and homogenized in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 at a ratio of 1 mg:10 mL. This was followed by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 5 min and separation of supernatant into labelled Eppendorf tubes. The supernatant was used for the assay of biochemical parameters which include acetylcholine esterase, catalase and glutathione-S-transferase activities and the total thiol contents of the experimental flies.
2.7. Determination of acetylcholine esterase activity
The AChE activity was assayed using the method of Ellman et al. [19] with slight modifications as described by Abolaji et al. [20]. Briefly, 0.8 mM acetylthiocholine was added to a medium containing 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 1 mM of DTNB to initiate the reaction. The absorbance was read at 412 nm every 30 s for 2 min. The activity of AChE was calculated as μmol of acetylthiocholine hydrolysed/min/mg protein.
2.8. Determination of catalase activity
Catalase activity was determined according to the method of Aebi [21]. 10 μL of the sample was added to a mixture of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 300 mM H2O2. Absorbance was read at 240 nm every 10 s for 2 min and the activity of catalase was estimated as μmol of H2O2 consumed per min/mg of protein.
2.9. Determination of glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity
The method of Habig and Jakoby [22] was used for the evaluation of GST activity. 20 μL of the sample was added to 270 μL of solution A (containing 20 μL of 0.25 M potassium phosphate buffer plus 2.5 mM EDTA, 10.5 μL of distilled water and 500 μL of 0.1 M GSH at pH 7.0 and 25 °C) followed by the addition of 10 μL of 25 mM CDNB. Absorbance was read at 340 nm 10-s interval for 5 min. GST activity was expressed in mmol/min/mg protein.
2.10. Determination of total thiol content
The total thiol content was determined according to the method of Ellman [23]. Briefly, 20 μL of the sample was added to the Ellman's reagent comprising 510 μL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 35 μL of 1 mM DTNB and 35 μL of distilled water. The assay medium was incubated for 30 min at room temperature after which the absorbance was read at 412 nm.
2.11. In silico analysis of the AChE inhibitory potentials of bioactive compounds of Cymbopogon citratus
2.11.1. Ligand preparation
Forty-five (45) bioactive compounds of Cymbopogon citratus were obtained from previous reports and Ethnobotanical Databases [10,11]. Using the Ligprep panel of Maestro 12.5, Schrödinger Suite 2020-3, the compounds and the standard ligand (9-(3-Iodobenzylamino)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroacridine or PDB: 1QON) were prepared to obtain low-energy 3D structures with suitable chiralities. The ionization state for each ligand structure was generated at a physiological pH of 7.2 ± 0.2. Stereoisomers of each ligand were computed by retaining specified chiralities while others were varied.
2.11.2. Protein preparation
The crystal structure of Drosophila melanogaster Acetylcholinesterase (DmAChE) with PDB ID: 1QON was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) repository. Using Glide (Schrödinger Suite 2020-3), the protein structure obtained was prepared via the protein preparation wizard panel. During the preparation processes, hydrogen atoms were added, bond orders were allocated, disulfide bonds were generated, the side chains and loops that are missing were replaced using prime. Water molecules located outside 3.0 Å of the heteroatoms were removed and the protein structure was minimized using OPLS3e and optimized using PROPKA [24,25].
2.11.3. The generation of receptor grid
The receptor grid was created to outline the position and size of the protein's active site for ligand docking. This was done using the receptor grid generation tool of Schrödinger Maestro 12.5. The position of the co-crystalized ligand (1qon) in the active site of the protein was used as the scoring grid.
2.11.4. Protein-ligand docking
The molecular docking analysis was carried out using the Glide-Ligand Docking panel of Maestro 12.5 on Schrödinger Suite 2020-3. The prepared ligands and the receptor grid file were imported into the workspace of Maestro, using standard precision (SP) docking, the ligands were docked into the binding pocket of the target protein. The vdW radius scaling factor was scaled at 0.80 with a partial charge cut-off of 0.15 for ligand atoms and the ligand sampling method was set to be flexible.
2.11.5. Molecular dynamics simulation
The molecular interaction of the best scoring compound with DmAChE was further validated through molecular dynamics simulation using the MOE 2019.0102. The NPT ensemble was performed at T = 300 K. The initialization stage was for 100ps, the length of the simulation was 500 ps and the relaxation time was 0.5 ps.
2.11.6. Statistical analyses
Data were expressed as mean + standard deviation (n = 5). Treated and control groups were compared using a one-way analysis of variance ANOVA followed by a post hoc test. A 95% confidence interval was used to determine statistical differences between treated and control groups, p values less than 0.05 (p < 0.05).
3. Results
3.1. Survival rate and negative geotaxis of Drosophila melanogaster exposed to Cymbopogon citratus leaf extract
Exposure of flies to Cymbopogon citratus leaf extract caused a significant decrease in the survival rate of flies at 100 and 200 mg/mL along the 3 h of exposure (Fig. 1). The climbing rate of flies also significantly decreased at the end of the 45 min of exposure (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1.
The survival rate of D. melanogaster following exposure to Cymbopogon citratus leaf extract. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5).
Fig. 2.
% Negative geotaxis of D. melanogaster following exposure to Cymbopogon citratus leaf extract. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values with * is significant at (p < 0.05) versus control.
3.2. Effects of Cymbopogon citratus leaf extract on AChE activity and other biochemical parameters in D. melanogaster
Exposure to Cymbopogon citratus leaf extract caused a significant decrease in the acetylcholinesterase and catalase activities of the flies at 200 mg/mL when compared with control flies (Fig. 3, Fig. 4). GST activity significantly increased and total thiol levels significantly decreased at 100 and 200 mg/mL (Fig. 5, Fig. 6).
Fig. 3.
Acetylcholinesterase activity of D. melanogaster following exposure to 100 and 200 mg/mL of Cymbopogon citratus leaf extract. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values with * is significant at (p < 0.05) versus control.
Fig. 4.
Changes in catalase activity in D. melanogaster following exposure to 70% ethanolic extract of Cymbopogon citratus leaf. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values with * is significant at (p < 0.05) versus control.
Fig. 5.
Changes in glutathione-S-transferase activity in D. melanogaster following exposure to 70% ethanolic extract of Cymbopogon citratus leaf. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values with * is significant at (p < 0.05) versus control.
Fig. 6.
Changes in total thiol level in D. melanogaster following exposure to 70% ethanolic extract of Cymbopogon citratus leaf. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5). Values with * is significant at (p < 0.05) versus control.
3.3. Molecular docking analysis of bioactive compounds of Cymbopogon citratus against Drosophila melanogaster acetylcholine esterase (DmAChE)
Table 1 shows the docking scores of the bioactive compounds of Cymbopogon citratus against DmAChE. The compounds showed docking scores ranging from −9.407 to −0.484 kcal/mol against the enzyme, while the standard ligand showed a docking score of −15.402 kcal/mol. Among the Cymbopogon citratus compounds, (+)-Cymbodiacetal scored highest followed by proximadiol, geranylacetone, and rutin while triacontanol scored lowest.
Table 1.
Docking scores of the bioactive compounds of Cymbopogon citratus against DmAChE.
| Compound | PubChem CID | Docking score (kcal/mol) |
|---|---|---|
| 1QON (standard ligand) | 448167 | −15.402 |
| (+)-Cymbodiacetal | 11336586 | −9.407 |
| Proximadiol | 165258 | −8.253 |
| Geranylacetone | 1549778 | −8.177 |
| Rutin | 5280805 | −8.148 |
| Alpha-Camphorene | 101750 | −8.085 |
| Farnesol | 445070 | −7.97 |
| Hexacosanol | 68171 | −7.096 |
| Piperitone | 6987 | −7.025 |
| Eucalyptol | 2758 | −7.014 |
| Beta-Caryophyllene | 5281515 | −6.989 |
| Farnesal | 5280598 | −6.975 |
| (+)-Alpha-Terpineol | 442501 | −6.901 |
| Geranyl acetate | 1549026 | −6.884 |
| Isopulegol | 170833 | −6.88 |
| (−)-Pinene | 15837102 | −6.833 |
| Borneol | 64685 | −6.83 |
| Alpha-terpineol | 17100 | −6.783 |
| Alpha-pinene | 6654 | −6.747 |
| (+)-2-Carene | 600647 | −6.696 |
| Quercetin | 5280343 | −6.677 |
| Citronellal | 7794 | −6.517 |
| Geraniol | 637566 | −6.482 |
| Methyl Eugenol | 7127 | −6.478 |
| Luteolin | 5280445 | −6.418 |
| Nerol | 643820 | −6.37 |
| Citronellol | 8842 | −6.145 |
| Citral | 638011 | −6.14 |
| 10-(Ethylaminocarbonyl)capric acid | 454075 | −6.136 |
| Neral | 643779 | −6.121 |
| Linalyl acetate | 8294 | −6.063 |
| Limonene | 22311 | −6.004 |
| Geranic acid | 5275520 | −5.929 |
| Estragole | 8815 | −5.891 |
| Citronellyl Acetate | 9017 | −5.84 |
| Citronellic Acid | 10402 | −5.82 |
| Linalool | 6549 | −5.452 |
| Myrcene | 31253 | −5.328 |
| Methyl-heptenone | 54531913 | −5.068 |
| Methyl-heptenol | 20745 | −4.8 |
| Caprylic acid | 379 | −4.732 |
| Isovaleraldehyde | 11552 | −4.683 |
| (−)-Linalool | 443158 | −4.373 |
| Isovaleric acid | 10430 | −4.01 |
| Furfural | 7362 | −3.785 |
| Triacontanol | 68972 | −0.484 |
The analysis of the biological interactions showed that, in addition to other types of molecular contacts, the standard ligand interacted with the enzyme by forming pi-pi stacking interactions with TRP 83, TYR 71, TYR 370, TYR 374 and PHE 317; a halogen bond with GLY 150 and hydrophobic interactions with TYR 71, TYR 162, TYR 324, TYR 370, TYR 374, TRP 83, TRP, 321, LEU 328 and PHE 330 (Fig. 7). (+)-Cymbodiacetal formed hydrogen bonds with TYR 370 and GLU 80; and hydrophobic interactions with TYR 71, TYR 162, TYR 148, TYR 370, TYR 374, TRP 472, TRP 82, LEU 159, LEU 479, ILE 484, PHE 471, and MET 476 (Fig. 8). Proximadiol formed hydrogen bonds with TYR 370 and ASP 375; and hydrophobic interactions with TRP 83, TRP 321, TYR 71, TYR 324, TYR 370, TYR 374, PHE 330, PHE 371, and LEU 328 (Fig. 9). It is important to note that the hydrogen bonds formed by (+)-Cymbodiacetal and Proximadiol with TYR 370 are facilitated by water molecules. Geranyl acetone formed a hydrogen bond with TRP 83 and hydrophobic interactions with TRP 83, TRP 472, TRP 321, TYR 71, TYR 370, TRY 374, LEU 479, PHE 330, and PHE 371 (Fig. 10). Rutin formed hydrogen bonds with LEU 471, ASP 160, ASP 482, SER 470, and GLN 490; and hydrophobic interactions with ILE 82, ILE 161, TRP 83, TRP 472, TRP 498, LEU 471, LEU 479, and LEU 498 (Fig. 11).
Fig. 7.
3D and 2D representations of the molecular interactions of 1qon with DmAChE.
Fig. 8.
3D and 2D representations of the molecular interactions of (+)-Cymbodiacetal with DmAChE.
Fig. 9.
3D and 2D representations of the molecular interactions of Proximadiol with DmAChE.
Fig. 10.
3D and 2D representations of the molecular interactions of Geranylacetone with DmAChE.
Fig. 11.
3D and 2D representations of the molecular interactions of Rutin with DmAChE.
3.4. Molecular modeling of biological interactions of (+)-Cymbodiacetal with DmAChE
Following the molecular dynamics simulation study of the DmAChE-Cymbodiacetal complex. (+)-Cymbodiacetal was still occupied the same binding pocket as observed in the docking study. It retained the hydrogen bond interaction with TYR 370 and the hydrophobic interactions with TYR 71, TYR 162, TYR 148, TYR 370, TYR 374, TRP 472, TRP 82, LEU 479, ILE 484 and PHE 471 (Fig. 12).
Fig. 12.
3D and 2D representations of the molecular interactions of (+)-Cymbodiacetal with DmAChE after Molecular Dynamics Simulation.
4. Discussion
Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is an enzyme that terminates synaptic transmission at cholinergic synapses through its swift hydrolysis of acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter, and it has been an effective target for a wide array of chemical agents including the anti-Alzheimer drugs and insecticides [1,3]. Insecticide development is a very important aspect of the global fight against epidemics and pandemics. Over seventeen per cent of all infectious diseases are vector-borne and they are responsible for over 700 000 deaths yearly [26]. Insect-borne diseases like malaria and dengue hemorrhagic fever are among the deadliest infections worldwide [27] and one of the ways of controlling them is through the use of insecticides. Nevertheless, the emergence of insecticide-resistant strains of insects has rendered insecticide development a persistent struggle [3]. The drastic reduction in the sensitivity of insects to organophosphate and carbamate insecticides has elevated the effective doses of these chemicals, leading to increased human exposure to their toxic adverse effects [7]. Hence, the use of insecticides of natural origin is a good alternative. This study has not only provided a scientific basis for the alternative use of Cymbopogon citratus as an insecticidal/insect-repellent plant, but it has further revealed its potential as a source of AChE-targeting agents. Exposure of flies to Cymbopogon citratus leaf extract significantly reduced the survival rate of flies throughout the exposure period (Fig. 1). This was accompanied by a corresponding decline in the percentage negative geotaxis (Fig. 2) and the activities of AChE and catalase of the flies (Fig. 3, Fig. 4). The GST activities of the flies were significantly elevated (Fig. 5) and the total thiol levels were significantly reduced (Fig. 6).
Percentage negative geotaxis is a measure of the locomotor performance of flies based on the number of flies that climbed beyond a defined distance within a specific time or the amount of time it takes to climb a specified height [1]. Reduction in negative geotaxis which is usually accompanied by a decreased AChE activity is regarded as an indicator of the neurotoxicity of chemicals [12]. Several studies have demonstrated a reduction in the negative geotactic capacity of flies following exposure to toxic chemicals, and as observed in this present study, the reductions were connected with AChE inhibition [1,20,28]. In our previous study, it was observed that exposure to benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol-910-epoxide (BPDE) caused a significant decline in the rate of survival and negative geotaxis of flies and the involvement of AChE inhibition in this activity was demonstrated both in vivo and in silico [1]. Abolaji et al. reported a significant decrease in the negative geotaxis of flies exposed to 4-vinylcyclohexene1,2-monoepoxide (VCM) and 4-Vinylcyclohexenediepoxide (VCD) and it was accompanied by an inhibition of AChE activity [20]. Sharma et al. showed a positive correlation between AChE inhibition and the locomotor performance of flies [29]. The ability of Cymbopogon citratus to reduce the locomotor performance of flies with a corresponding reduction in DmAChE activity therefore makes it a promising source of natural neurotoxic agents against insects.
The significant reduction of the catalase activity of flies exposed to Cymbopogon citratus leaf extract has further authenticated the insecticidal activity of the plant. The enzyme catalase is an essential component of the antioxidant defence system of organisms and it catalyses the metabolism of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to water (H2O) and molecular (O2) thereby maintaining redox balance [1]. Inhibition of catalase activity is one of the toxicological consequences of exposure to toxic compounds and it is one of the mechanisms underlying the insecticidal action of many insecticides. Paluzar and Sagiroglu evaluated the inhibitory effect of some pesticides on the activity of catalase in an in vitro study [30]. All the compounds tested (Deltamethrin, Dichlorvos, Malathion and Lambda-cyhalothrin) inhibited the enzyme either competitively or non-competitively. Inhibition of catalase which could be a result of chemical-induced oxidative stress might limit the protective role of the enzyme thereby exposing the insects to the detrimental effects of the chemical [1].
GST is another component of the antioxidant defence system of organisms. This superfamily of enzymes catalyses the conjugation of toxic (electrophilic) intermediates with glutathione, thus shielding the cells from the toxic effects of foreign chemicals [1]. Therefore, the increased GST activity observed in the flies exposed to lemongrass in this study is part of the animal's response to the active components of the plant. But this response could have been counteracted by other toxicological effects of the extract on the flies. These include the reduction of total thiol levels in addition to the AChE and catalase inhibition. Thiols (glutathione, homocysteine, cysteinylglycine and cysteine) are a class of naturally occurring protective biomolecules that contain a sulfhydryl group (-SH). Due to their nucleophilic structure, they are able to offer protection by reacting with electrophilic intermediates [1]. A significant decrease in total thiol level as observed in the lemon grass-exposed flies in this study, therefore, predisposes the animals to the toxic effects of the extract.
To identify potential AChE inhibitors in Cymbopogon citratus, molecular docking analysis of some previously characterized bioactive compounds of the plant was conducted against DmAChE. The 45 compounds showed varying levels of binding affinities with docking scores ranging from −9.407 to −0.484 kcal/mol against the enzyme. The four top-scoring Cymbopogon citratus compounds, are (+)-Cymbodiacetal (−9.407 kcal/mol), Proximadiol (−8.253 kcal/mol), Geranylacetone (−8.177 kcal/mol) and Rutin (−8.148 kcal/mol). The 2D and 3D models of the protein-ligand interactions showed that the four compounds occupied the same binding pocket as the co-crystallized ligand (1qon). The interaction of 1qon with DmAChE in this study (Fig. 7) is similar to that described by Harel et al. [3] As observed in this study, the tacrine moiety of the inhibitor was found to make planar pi-pi interactions with TRP 83 and TYR 370 in addition to other types of contacts at the active-site gorge of the enzyme. Aromatic amino-acid residues like TYR 71, TRP 83, TYR 324, PHE 330, TYR 370, PHE 371, TYR 374, TRP 472 and HIS 480 at the active-site gorge are reported to play significant roles in binding the enzyme to the inhibitor [3]. This is in line with the results obtained in this study and it shows the reliability of the docking programme used.
The four top-scoring lemon grass compounds were also found to interact with these important active site amino acid residues. Apart from their hydrophobic contacts with the amino acids, they also formed hydrogen bonds with two or more active site residues. (+)-Cymbodiacetal formed hydrogen bonds with TYR 370 and GLU 80, Proximadiol with TYR 370 and ASP 375, Geranyl acetone with TRP 83 and Rutin with LEU 471, ASP 160, ASP 482, SER 470 and GLN 490. These interactions, therefore, make them potential inhibitors of DmAChE and possible contributors to the insecticidal activities of lemongrass. It is also of interest to note that the hydrogen bonds formed by (+)-Cymbodiacetal and Proximadiol with TYR 370 in the docking study are facilitated by water molecules. Active site water molecules play very crucial roles in protein-ligand binding and this has attracted a lot of attention. AChEs have been found to contain quite a number of gorge water molecules which exhibit properties that aid catalysis and molecular interactions with ligands [31]. These properties could have contributed to the high docking scores exhibited by (+)-Cymbodiacetal and Proximadiol for DmAChE compared with other Cymbopogon citratus compounds.
In the molecular dynamics simulation study of the DmAChE-Cymbodiacetal complex, which was carried out to further validate the docking results and investigate the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on the observed molecular interactions. (+)-Cymbodiacetal was still observed to occupied the same binding pocket as observed in the docking study. It retained the hydrogen bond interaction with TYR 370 and the hydrophobic interactions with most of the amino acid residues observed in the docking study. This further authenticate the possible inhibitory activity of this compound against drosophila AChE.
Cymbodiacetal is a bis-monoterpenoid first isolated from Cymbopogon martini by Bottini et al. [32]. Monoterpenoids, which are mostly found in plant essential oils, are among the most effective class of natural pesticides. These compounds are recognized as insecticides, insect repellents and acaricides [33]. Monoterpenoids are also been explored as potent inhibitors of AChE and as promising alternatives for the treatment of neurological disorders like Alzheimer's Disease (AD) [34,35]. This present study, therefore, identifies (+)-Cymbodiacetal, a bis-monoterpenoid from Cymbopogon species as one of the probable AChE-targeting agents and potential insecticides in lemongrass. Proximadiol, the second top-scoring Cymbopogon citratus compound identified in this study [36], belong to a category of terpenoids called sesquiterpenoids which are known to exhibit a wide range of biological activities [37]. Previous studies have reported the ability of some sesquiterpenoids to regulate cholinergic transmission through AChE inhibition [37]. The third promising compound is Geranyl acetone which is a monoterpene ketone. This volatile oil component of plants is responsible for the flavouring and fragrance properties of many plants [38,39] and as suggested by the molecular docking analysis conducted in this study, it is likely to contribute to the insecticidal property of lemongrass. Rutin is a flavonol also known as rutoside, quercetin-3-rutinoside, and sophorin and it is an essential nutritional constituent of foodstuff. It has been shown to exhibit several pharmacological activities and its insecticidal property has been reported [40]. Its interaction with DmAChE in this study has projected it as one of the possible AChE-targeting agents in Cymbopogon citratus.
5. Conclusion
Exposure of Drosophila melanogaster to 100 and 200 mg/mL Cymbopogon citratus leaf extract induced a neurotoxic effect in the flies as revealed by the increased mortality, decreased negative geotaxis and inhibition of AChE activity in the exposed flies. The toxic effect was further supported by a reduction in catalase activity and total thiol contents of the flies. The bioactive compounds of Cymbopogon citratus showed possible binding affinities for Drosophila melanogaster AChE and the four top-scoring compounds are (+)-Cymbodiacetal, proximadiol, geranylacetone, and rutin. The compounds occupied the same binding pocket and interacted with similar active site amino acid residues as the co-crystallized ligand (1qon). These compounds are suggested to be responsible for the insecticidal and AChE inhibitory potentials of Cymbopogon citratus and they could be further explored in the development of AChE-targeting insecticides.
Funding
This study was funded solely by the authors.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Contributor Information
Titilayo Omolara Johnson, Email: titijohnson2004@yahoo.com.
Oluwafemi Adeleke Ojo, Email: oluwafemiadeleke08@gmail.com.
Data availability
Data will be made available on request.
References
- 1.Johnson T.O., Abolaji A.O., Omale S., Longdet Y.I., Kutshik J.R., Oyetayo O.B., et al. Benzo[a]pyrene and Benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-epoxide induced locomotor and reproductive senescence and altered biochemical parameters of oxidative damage in Canton-S Drosophila melanogaster. Toxicol. Rep. 2021;8:571–580. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim J.I., Jung C.S., Koh Y.H., Lee S.H. Molecular, biochemical and histochemical characterization of two acetylcholinesterase cDNAs from the German cockroach Blattella germanica. Insect Mol. Biol. 2006;15:513–522. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00666.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Harel M., Kryger G., Rosenberry T.L., Mallender W.D., Lewis T., Fletcher R.J., et al. Three-dimensional structures of Drosophila melanogaster acetylcholinesterase and of its complexes with two potent inhibitors. Protein Sci. 2000;9:1063–1072. doi: 10.1110/ps.9.6.1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Menozzi P., Shi M.A., Lougarre A., Tang Z.H., Fournier D. Mutations of acetylcholinesterase which confer insecticide resistance in Drosophila melanogaster populations. BMC Evol. Biol. 2004;4:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-4-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Milatovic D., Gupta R.C., Aschner M. Anticholinesterase toxicity and oxidative stress. Sci. World J. 2006;6:295–310. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ćupić Miladinovic D., Borozan S., Ivanović S. Involvement of cholinesterases in oxidative stress induced by chlorpyrifos in the brain of Japanese quail. Poultry Sci. 2018;97:1564–1571. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Trang A., Pb K. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): 2021. Physiology , Acetylcholinesterase. StatPearls [Internet] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Moustafa M.A.M., Awad M., Amer A., Hassan N.N., Ibrahim E.-D.S., Ali H.M., et al. Insecticidal activity of lemongrass essential oil as an eco-friendly agent against the black Cutworm Agrotis ipsilon (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2021;2:737. doi: 10.3390/insects12080737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shah G., Shri R., Panchal V., Sharma N., Singh B., Mann A.S. Scientific basis for the therapeutic use of Cymbopogon citratus, stapf (Lemon grass) J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2011;2:3–8. doi: 10.4103/2231-4040.79796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shaikh M.N., Suryawanshi Y.C., Mokat D.N. Volatile profiling and essential oil yield of Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) stapf treated with Rhizosphere fungi and some important fertilizers. J. Essent. Oil Bear Plants. 2019;22:477–483. doi: 10.1080/0972060x.2019.1613933. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.U.S. Department of Agriculture ARS . 2016. Dr. Duke's Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Databases.http://phytochem.nal.usda.gov/ [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Plata-rueda A., Da G., Rolim S., Wilcken C.F., Zanuncio C., Serr E., et al. Acute toxicity and sublethal effects of lemongrass essential oil and their components against the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius. Insects. 2020;11:1–13. doi: 10.3390/insects11060379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Enan E. Insecticidal activity of essential oils: octopaminergic sites of action. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2001;130:325–337. doi: 10.1016/S1532-0456(01)00255-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ojewumi M.E., Banjo M.G., Oresegun M.O., Ogunbiyi T.A., Ayoola A.A., Awolu O.O., et al. Analytical investigation of the extract of lemon grass leaves in repelling mosquito. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2017;8:2048–2055. doi: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.8(5).1000-09. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chintalchere J.M., Dar M.A., Raut K.D., Pandit R.S. Bioefficacy of lemongrass and tea tree essential oils against house fly, Musca domestica. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India B Biol. Sci. 2021;91:307–318. doi: 10.1007/s40011-020-01220-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kimutai A., Ngeiywa M., Mulaa M., Njagi P.G.N., Ingonga J., Nyamwamu L.B., et al. Repellent effects of the essential oils of Cymbopogon citratus and Tagetes minuta on the sandfly, Phlebotomus duboscqi. BMC Res. Notes. 2017;10:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2396-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aljedani D.M. Effects of some insecticides (Deltamethrin and malathion) and lemongrass oil on fruit fly (drosophila melanogaster) Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 2021;24:477–491. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2021.477.491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Abolaji A.O., Kamdem J.P., Lugokenski T.H., Nascimento T.K., Waczuk E.P., Farombi E.O., et al. Involvement of oxidative stress in 4-vinylcyclohexene-induced toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2014;71:99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.11.008. 99–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ellman G.L., Courtney K.D., Andres V., Featherstone R.M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961;7:88–90. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Abolaji A.O., Kamdem J.P., Lugokenski T.H., Farombi E.O., Souza D.O., da Silva Loreto É.L., et al. Ovotoxicants 4-vinylcyclohexene 1,2-monoepoxide and 4-vinylcyclohexene diepoxide disrupt redox status and modify different electrophile sensitive target enzymes and genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Redox Biol. 2015;5:328–339. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121–126. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(84)05016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Habig W.H., Jakoby W.B. Assays for differentiation of glutathione S-Transferases - Methods Enzymol. 1981;77:398–405. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(81)77053-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ellman G.L. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1959;82:70–77. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Olsson M.H.M., SØndergaard C.R., Rostkowski M., Jensen J.H. PROPKA3: consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical p K a predictions. J. Chem. Theor. Comput. 2011;7:525–537. doi: 10.1021/ct100578z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Iwaloye O., Elekofehinti O.O., Momoh A.I., Babatomiwa K., Ariyo E.O. In silico molecular studies of natural compounds as possible anti-Alzheimer’s agents: ligand-based design. Netw. Model Anal. Heal Inform. Bioinform. 2020;9:54. doi: 10.1007/s13721-020-00262-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.World Health Organisation . 2020. Vector-borne Diseases. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Manguin S., Mouchet J., Carnevale P. Main topics in entomology:Insects as disease vectors. RSC Green Chem. 2011;1–52 [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sharma A., Mishra M., Shukla A.K., Kumar R., Abdin M.Z., Chowdhuri D.K. Organochlorine pesticide, endosulfan induced cellular and organismal response in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Hazard Mater. 2012;221–222:275–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bhakuni R.S., Jain D.C., Sharma R.P., Kumar S. Secondary metabolites of Artemisia annua and their biological activity. Curr. Sci. 2001;80:35–48. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Paluzar H., Sagiroglu A. Vol. 48. 2016. In Vitro Effects of Pesticide Exposure on Bovine Liver Catalase Activity; pp. 720–724. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Xu Y., Cheng S., Sussman J.L., Silman I., Jiang H. 2017. Computational Studies on Acetylcholinesterases. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bottini A.T., Dev V., Garfagnoli D.J., Hope H., Joshi P., Lohani H., et al. Isolation and crystal structure of a novel dihemiacetal bis-monoterpenoid from Cymbopogon martinii. Phytochemistry. 1987;26:2301–2302. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(00)84706-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zarrad K., Laarif A., Ben Hamouda A., Chaieb I. Vol. 19. 2017. pp. 643–652. (Anticholinesterase Potential of Monoterpenoids on the Whitefly Bemisia tabaci and Their Kinetic Studies). [Google Scholar]
- 34.Orhan I., Sener B., Choudhary M.I., Khalid A. Acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of some Turkish medicinal plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004;91:57–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2003.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dohi S., Terasaki M., Masakazu M. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity and chemical composition of commercial essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009;57:4313–4318. doi: 10.1021/jf804013j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Evans F.E., Miller D.W., Cairns T., Baddeley G.V., Wenkert E. Structure analysis of proximadiol (Cryptomeridiol ) by 13C NMR spectroscopy. Phytochemistry. 1982;21:937–938. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Arya A., Chahal R., Rao R., Rahman H., Kaushik D., Akhtar M.F., et al. 2021. Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Potential of Various Sesquiterpene Analogues for Alzheimer ’ s Disease Therapy; pp. 1–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pino J.A., Mesa J., Munoz Y., Marti M.P., Marbot R. Volatile components from mango ( Mangifera indica L .) cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005;53:2213–2223. doi: 10.1021/jf0402633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bonikowski R., Świtakowska P., Kula J. Synthesis , odour evaluation and antimicrobial activity of some geranyl acetone and nerolidol analogues. Flavour Fragrance J. 2015;30:238–244. doi: 10.1002/ffj.3238. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Keeler R.F., Tu A.T. Marcel Dekker; New York, Basel, Hong Kong: 1991. Handbook of Natural Toxins, Vol. 6. Toxicology of Plant and Fungal Compounds. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.












