Skip to main content
International Journal of Food Science logoLink to International Journal of Food Science
. 2021 Nov 20;2021:1844675. doi: 10.1155/2021/1844675

Differentiation of Organic Cocoa Beans and Conventional Ones by Using Handheld NIR Spectroscopy and Multivariate Classification Techniques

Elliot K Anyidoho 1,2,, Ernest Teye 1,3, Robert Agbemafle 4
PMCID: PMC8627362  PMID: 34845434

Abstract

The global market for organic cocoa beans continues to show sturdy growth. A low-cost handheld NIR spectrometer (900-1700 nm) combined with multivariate classification algorithms was used for rapid differentiation analysis of organic cocoa beans' integrity. In this research, organic and conventionally cultivated cocoa beans were collected from different locations in Ghana and scanned nondestructively with a handheld spectrometer. Different preprocessing treatments were employed. Principal component analysis (PCA) and classification analysis, RF (random forest), KNN (K-nearest neighbours), LDA (linear discriminant analysis), and PLS-DA (partial least squares-discriminant analysis) were performed comparatively to build classification models. The performance of the models was evaluated by accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and efficiency. Second derivative preprocessing together with PLS-DA algorithm was superior to the rest of the algorithms with a classification accuracy of 100.00% in both the calibration set and prediction set. Second derivative algorithm was found to be the best preprocessing tool. The identification rates for the calibration set and prediction set were 96.15% and 98.08%, respectively, for RF, 91.35% and 92.31% for KNN, and 90.38% and 98.08% for LDA. Generally, the results showed that a handheld NIR spectrometer coupled with an appropriate multivariate algorithm could be used in situ for the differentiation of organic cocoa beans from conventional ones to ensure food integrity along the cocoa bean value chain.

1. Introduction

Several modern-day environmental challenges are rooted in agri-food schemes. These schemes are held partly accountable for the decrease in ecosystem destruction, water pollution, global warming, and biodiversity. Hence, the greening of agri-food production, processing, and marketing can be an important contribution to quality, safety, and sustainability. The advent of post-Fordism has put environmental issues and quality matters at the heart of agri-food provisioning schemes [1, 2].

The enhancement of sustainability performance in the cocoa industry is developing as a strategy within universal product value chains. In making the global cocoa chain and network sustainable, both private and public players have introduced many initiatives at different levels. The main driver of this trend is the emerging consumer demand for socially fair and eco-friendly products. For instance, sales of organic chocolate reached USA $304 million in 2005, representing an increase of 75% in comparison to 2002 sales [3]. Much attention has to be shifted to West Africa because it produces more than 70% of all cocoa and is the location of many organic initiatives. Ghana the second largest exporter of cocoa started the exportation of organic cocoa in 2005 to the global market. More than 20,000 smallholder farmers are currently involved in the organic cocoa network, as well as other stakeholders at national levels, such as nongovernmental organizations, farmers' organizations, several public institutions, licensed buying companies, and importers [4]. Inferentially, the most important bean category which influences and drives consumers' preference, nutritional composition, quality, and safety is the organic cocoa bean category [5]. Organic cocoa beans unlike conventional ones are cocoa beans produced following the farming practices and principles that do not allow the use of growth-stimulating elements, herbicides, synthetic pesticides, and fertilizers [5, 6]. Concerns about growth-stimulating elements, herbicides, synthetic pesticides, and fertilizers have given additional motivation to organic cocoa bean demand, as consumers progressively query the quality and safety of conventional cocoa beans [7]. Relative to the aforementioned factors, the demand for organic cocoa beans by chocolate producers and consumers has increased, and the production of organic cocoa beans is more lucrative due to the higher price it receives [8]. The higher price for the organic label as compared to the conventional cocoa beans has led to mislabeling which is regarded as fraud to gain undeserved economic advantage. The international market and consumers, thus, call for trust tags for organically produced cocoa beans [9, 10]. Therefore, screening of organic cocoa beans before export, marketing, and processing to prevent mislabeling has become very necessary.

Currently, the techniques for ensuring the integrity and quality of organic cocoa beans are mostly cumbersome, time-consuming, expensive, involve destructive means, and require highly skilled personnel and are often not applicable in low-resource countries. The use of handheld NIR spectrometer and chemometric analysis for ensuring the integrity and authenticity of organic cocoa beans from conventional ones could provide a big help. This would offer a rapid, nondestructive, and less expensive technique for the assessment of organic and conventional cocoa beans for quality control and assurance purposes.

Near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy technique has become increasingly significant among other established green advance techniques in food technology. It provides a nondestructive analytical tool, more especially for the assessment of chemical composition and physical quality characteristics of cocoa bean and cocoa products [11]. This is due to its sensitivity to OH, CH, and NH absorptions associated with cocoa bean components. It is fast, requires little or no sample preparation, has low operating cost, and is environmentally friendly [12]. In other studies, the NIR spectroscopy has been used for the quantification of moisture content, nitrogen, and fat of cocoa powder [13], prediction of procyanidins in cocoa [14], differentiation of Ghana cocoa beans and cocoa bean varieties [15, 16], verification of cocoa powder authenticity [17], classification and determination of chemical quality parameters [1820], and estimation of cocoa bean parameters [21]. A critical study of recent applications of the use of NIR spectroscopic technique in the cocoa bean industry showed that it has also been applied in the rapid detection of cocoa bean adulterations and fraud [22, 23] and quality control of commercial cocoa beans [24]. Therefore, NIR spectroscopy offers a reliable alternative for the assessment of organic cocoa bean integrity and quality.

Additionally, advancement in NIR instrumentation has led to the miniaturization of stationary laboratory-based NIR spectrometers into lightweight handheld spectroscopic instruments that are simple, relatively less expensive, reliable, and provide extra speed. Their portability makes them ideal instruments for in situ assessments of agricultural products. In this regard, the cocoa bean industry is expected to benefit from the current interest in miniaturizing NIR spectroscopic technology. However, no studies have investigated the application of handheld NIR spectrometer for screening and ensuring the integrity of organic cocoa beans nondestructively. Also, no information is available on the application of different multivariate classification algorithms for effective and accurate discrimination of organic cocoa beans.

Therefore, the objective of this work was to use a handheld NIR spectrometer and multivariate classification techniques to nondestructively identify organic cocoa beans from conventional cocoa beans. Specifically, the study is aimed at determining the ideal multivariate classification algorithm for the accurate differentiation of organic and conventional cocoa beans.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cocoa Bean Samples

A total of 120 organic cocoa bean samples ready for exportation were obtained from the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana and Yayra Glover Limited, a licensed organic cocoa producing and marketing company in Ghana. Whilst 140 conventional cocoa bean samples were collected from the seven cocoa-producing regions of Ghana under the guide of the Quality Control Company and Cocoa Marketing Company of COCOBOD. The two categories of cocoa beans (organic and conventional) according to the producers were fermented for 6 days using heap protocols similar to those described by other authors [25]. The cocoa bean samples were well labelled and transported in marked jute bags to the Department of Agricultural Engineering Research Laboratory, University of Cape Coast, for further examination. Spectral measurements were taken on the whole cocoa beans, whilst chemical examinations were conducted on the ground samples.

2.2. Sample Spectral Measurement

The handheld NIR spectrometer (Tellspec®) was used to take the spectrum of each cocoa bean sample in an absorbance unit (log 1/R); R = reflectance. The NIR spectroscopic dataset was developed in a wavelength range of 900-1700 nm. The instrument was operated using a smartphone application, and spectroscopic data stored in the cloud remotely was downloaded onto the laptop. All the cocoa bean samples were scanned three times in a transparent polythene bag at different sides, and the spectrum for each sample was the mean of the three scans. Scanning of the samples was carried out at an ambient temperature of 25 ± 1°C with a humidity of 60%. The spectra were downloaded with permission from Tellspec Ltd.

2.3. Software Tool

All preprocessing and analysis of the spectra data were performed using multivariate analysis software in MATLAB version 9.6.0 (The MathWorks Inc., USA) with windows 10 Pro software package for data treatment.

2.4. Dataset Partitioning

The spectroscopic datasets obtained from 260 samples of organic and conventional cocoa beans were preprocessed with appropriate techniques. The spectral data obtained from the samples were randomly divided into two different datasets called: calibration set (spectroscopic data from 182 samples) and prediction set (spectroscopic data from 78 samples). The calibration set which represented 70% of the data was used to construct the models, whereas the remaining 30% of the data were used for the prediction set which was used to evaluate the predictive capability of the built models.

2.5. Spectral Preprocessing Approaches

The raw NIR spectra as shown in Figure 1(a) contain unwanted, beneficial, and nonuseful information of the cocoa bean samples. This could be as a result of interferences from the scattering of light from the samples, spectra poor reproducibility, temperature variations, and or background noises [26]. Therefore, chemometric pretreatment of the dataset has to acquire only the useful properties of samples, whilst keeping the similarities and variations among the primary observations was adopted. To accomplish this, three spectral preprocessing approaches such as MC (mean centering), FD (first derivative), and SD (second derivative) were comparatively employed in MATLAB version 9.6.0 as shown in Figures 1(b)1(d). MC is a spectral preprocessing approach carried out by computing the mean spectrum of the dataset and deducting the mean from each spectrum [27]. FD preprocessing approach which is assessed as the difference between two consequent spectra measurement points eliminates baseline effects. SD transformation algorithm is employed in the separation of overlapped peaks, resolution enhancement, removal of additive, and multiplicative baseline in the spectra. Before the application of the SD preprocessing technique, the NIR spectra were smoothed using the Savitzky-Golay algorithm [28]. Generally, the Savitzky-Golay smoothing SD algorithm best improved the linearity and corrected offset in NIR data.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Spectra: (a) raw spectra, (b) mean centering, (c) first derivative, and (d) second derivative of cocoa bean samples.

2.6. Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

Furthermore, the principal component analysis (PCA) was deployed on all the preprocessed NIR datasets to identify any cluster trend (to detect probable groupings). The PCA has been an unsupervised pattern recognition algorithm that extracted information from correlated matrices to see probable data leanings in a dimensional scatter plot. In the PCA analysis, the datasets coupled with spectra were converted into a small number of uncorrelated but explainable variables referred to as principal components (PCs). Similar samples congregated closer to each other and vice versa. The graphic profile of PCA results yielded initial output for the determination of possible variations and resemblances in a dataset. Usually, PC1, PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5, etc. explain and give relevant information in descending order [29].

2.7. Multivariate Classification Algorithms

2.7.1. RF

RF (random forest) is an ensemble procedure which is based on tree classifiers. It grows many classification trees in order to produce accurate discrimination. In RF, each tree grows on an independent bootstrap sample obtained from the calibration sample/data [30]. Classification of the new feature vector is achieved by classifying the input vector with each of the trees in the forest. A classification is given by each tree, often considered as that tree's vote for that class. The forest selects the classification with the maximum votes over all the trees in the forest [31]. RF computations comprise two measures of variable importance (based on rough-and-ready measure and permutations) and measures of the resemblance of data points that could be applied for graphical representation, multidimensional scaling, imputing missing values, and clustering [32].

2.7.2. KNN

KNN (K-nearest neighbours) is a nonparametric and linear learning algorithm where the distance between each of the samples of the calibration set and unknown sample is assessed; for more information, refer to Reference [33]. For KNN approach, the parameter K has a huge influence on the classification rate of the KNN model. The selection of K was optimised by computing the calibration ability with a preferably an old number of small K values. In this study, PCs were applied as an input data in KNN model. KNN model efficiency was examined by the number of parameter K and PCs [34].

2.7.3. LDA

LDA (linear discriminant analysis) is a linear and parametric supervised pattern recognition approach mostly applied to discover a linear combination of features, and the resultant combination may be employed as a linear classifier. LDA concept is founded on the determination of linear discrimination functions that produce the ratio between-class variance and decrease the ratio of within-class variance. In the LDA approach, the classes are linearly separated and keep to a normal distribution [35]. Also, the LDA is viewed as PCA in which the number of PC (principal component) is key to the performance of the LDA classification model.

2.7.4. PLS-DA

PLS-DA (partial least squares-discriminant analysis) is a linear differentiation technique that combines properties of partial least squares regression with the discrimination presentation of a differentiation technique [36]. The PLS-DA with a k-fold cross-validation was deployed to screen out and differentiate organic cocoa beans from conventional ones and to prevent overfitting of the calibration models. This qualitative transformational technique was performed to extract principal components from the spectral information, decrease the number of variables employed in the model, and find which variables carry the class separating information by rotating principal component analysis (PCA). This combines the variables in the dataset to calculate factors that maximize the correlation value with the different classes [37]. PLS-DA concurrently decomposes spectral and class matrices and extracts the spectral data most associated with the classes that can lead to the development of a reliable and accurate identification model [38].

2.8. Performance Assessment of Multivariate Data Analysis Algorithms

Qualitatively, the performance of the PLS-DA classification model was assessed according to identification rate or accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency. Accuracy is the proportion of samples, either organic cocoa beans or conventional cocoa beans correctly identified in a population, either in the calibration set or prediction set. It computes the degree of closeness or veracity of the measured result to the true value or analytical sample. Sensitivity evaluates the capability of the model to correctly identify and classify samples belonging to the targeted class (i.e., organic cocoa bean class). It measures how good the model is at detecting and classifying an organic cocoa bean from a conventional cocoa bean. Specificity evaluates the capability of the model to correctly detect and reject samples that belong to both classes (i.e., organic cocoa bean class and conventional cocoa bean class). It assesses how likely conventional cocoa beans could be ruled out correctly from organic cocoa beans. Efficiency is defined as the geometric mean of sensitivity and specificity in both calibration and prediction sets. Sensitivity and specificity depend on the values of true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN) ([39]; Wang et al. [40]). The assessment of the model's performance was done according to the methods described by Chen et al. [41] and Zhang et al. [42]. Computation of these parameters was done using Equations (1)–(4).

Accuracy=TN+TPTN+TP+FN+FP, (1)
Sensitivity=TPTP+FN, (2)
Specificity=TNTN+FP, (3)
Efficiency=SensitivitySpecificity. (4)

3. Results

3.1. Cocoa Compositional Quality Characteristics

The compositional quality characteristics varied according to the cocoa category as presented in Table 1. For both categories of cocoa beans, crude fat was the major constituent. These findings are consistent with results obtained by [18]. Crude fat, total carbohydrate, total polyphenols, total flavonoid, and antioxidant contents showed statistical differences between organic cocoa and conventional cocoa samples (p > 0.05). There were no significant statistical differences at p > 0.05 between the two cocoa bean categories for crude fibre and protein, although their obtained values numerically differed.

Table 1.

Proximate compositions (g/100 g) and phytonutrient contents for organic and conventional cocoa samples (mean ± SD).

Samples Crude fat (%) Crude fibre (%) Crude protein (%) Total carbohydrate (%) Total polyphenol content (mgGAE/g) Total flavonoid content (mgQE/g) Total antioxidant capacity (mgAEAC/g)
Organic 41.75 ± 0.20b 7.83 ± 0.08a 15.77 ± 0.31a 25.63 ± 0.46a 61.66 ± 0.16a 81.44 ± 0.56a 108.78 ± 0.45b
Conventional 43.66 ± 0.15a 7.56 ± 0.07a 15.45 ± 0.24a 22.41 ± 0.45b 59.73 ± 0.22b 72.66 ± 0.39b 130.03 ± 0.56a

NB: same letters show that there is no statistical difference (p > 0.05) among samples. GAE: gallic acid equivalent; QE: quercetin equivalent; AEAC: ascorbic acid equivalent antioxidant content.

3.2. NIR Spectra Examination

The raw spectra of the 260 cocoa bean samples obtained in the wavelength range of 900 to 1700 nm are presented in Figure 1(a). This spectral wavelength range can offer useful features for the differentiation of organic and conventional cocoa bean samples, though the raw spectra profile seemed to be similar. There was a wide variation of baseline shift in the spectra due to background information, particle size effect, temperature variation, and noise [26]. This made it difficult to determine exact bands in the original spectra due to the high degree of overlapping of bands. Hence, chemometric preprocessing analysis of the dataset was applied to acquire only the useful properties of samples and build a reliable model whereas keeping the similarities and variations among the primary observations. Among the chemometric analyses applied, the SD preprocessing approach best smoothens the original spectra and eventually leads to satisfactory classification, and its spectra are presented in Figure 1(d). This contributed to clear and noticeable groupings as shown in the mean spectra profile in Figure 2. It depicts specific absorption bands observed from main valleys and peaks that are related to vibrations of chemical bonds such as N-H, S-H, C=O, -CH3, and CH2 ([4345]; Zhang et al. [46]). These chemical bond vibrations are associated with major biochemical constituents such as polyphenols, flavonoids, alkaloids, antioxidants, volatile and nonvolatile acid, fats, proteins, carbonyl group, C-H deformation and C-H stretch as seen in Table 2, and other composites present in the cocoa beans no matter the production method or origin. Specifically, the absorption band attributable to C-H bond of cocoa that is mainly connected to proteins and fats was found around 910 nm [13]. Absorption bands of 1000-1100 nm are attributable to C-H stretch 1st overtone, carbonyl groups (-CH2, CH3-, and -CH=CH-) [13, 28, 47]. An observable absorption band around 1440 nm might be associated with 1st overtone of starch, moisture, and sugars [13]. These spectral wavelength bands might have significantly contributed to the classification of organic and conventional cocoa beans.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mean spectra profile of organic and conventional cocoa bean samples.

Table 2.

NIR wavelength band assignments.

Wavelength (nm) Functional group Band assignments
958 OH O-H 2nd overtone stretch of carbohydrate [54]
973, 1005 NH3 N-H 2nd overtone stretch associated with fat (Chu [53])
986 O-H O-H 1st and 2nd overtones stretch of absorption peak of starch [54]
1200 C-H C-H 1st overtones stretch related to proteins and starch [50]
1280 C-H C-H 1st overtone bond stretching corresponding to fats and aromatic compounds [52]
1483 O-H O-H 2nd overtone stretch corresponding moisture (Zhang et al. [53])
1417 O-H H2O band groups corresponding to weakly bounded water and aromatic compounds [43]
1440, 1460 O-H O-H stretch 1st overtone of starch, water band, and sugars ([13]; Zhang et al. [46])
1608 C=O C-O from COOH typical of amines and acidity [55]

3.3. Spectral Presentation and Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

To observe a visible trend of the samples and evaluate the relations among samples, PCA was performed using the raw spectral data and the outcomes presented in Figures 3(a)3(d). The PCA after second derivative preprocessing yielded a good cluster trend. The three topmost PCs extracted from the 260 samples were PC1 (68.03%), PC2 (16.71%), and PC3 (8.18%). It shows that the three topmost PCs can explain 92.92% of the variance information from the spectra dataset that covers the relevant biochemical information in the samples. PCA technique brings out useful relevant information and removes irrelevant ones so that bean samples with the same characteristics are clustered nearer to each other. Thus, the graphic output could be used to discover the variances between the categories of cocoa bean samples used. Figure 3(d) depicts that two main groups of cocoa bean samples were used in the study. The groups cover a broader array of cocoa beans. The graphic plot offers relevant information that could be used for the determination of differences between organic and conventional cocoa bean samples. PCA is not a classification tool but it showed the data trend in visualizing dimension space [48].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

PCA score plot of the first three PCs of organic and conventional cocoa beans: (a) raw, (b) MC, (c) FD, and (d) SD.

PCA loadings as shown in Figure 4 were performed to give an explanation as to how much each wavelength contributed to the significant variation in the data. It was observed that wavelengths corresponding to the biggest eigenvector loading values for PC1 (68.03%) were situated around the range of 986 nm associated with pH 1st overtone absorption peak O-H stretching (Wang et al. [49]) and O-H stretch 2nd overtone of carbohydrate; 1280 nm and 1417 nm are 2nd overtone bands C-H bond stretching and C-H combination (aromatic), respectively. The peak around 1200 nm could be attributed to the 1st overtone of C-H stretch [50]. These absorption bands are characteristics of proteins, fats, and aromatic compounds found in cocoa beans [45, 51, 52]. Observable absorption band around 1608 nm might be ascribed to 1st overtone of C-H stretching (Zhang et al. [53]). PC2 explains 16.71% of the variance, and the biggest vibration placed around 958 nm, 973, and 1395 nm correlated with 2nd overtone of OH stretch of carbohydrate, 2nd overtone of N-H stretching of fat, and 2x C-H stretch+C-H deformation of protein, respectively (Zhang et al. [53]). PC 3 explains 8.18% of the variation, and it appeared to be the mirror image of the cocoa bean spectra of the cocoa bean, and this accounted for the slight differences in particle size. The differences correlated to compositional variations among the cocoa bean categories. It implied a particular chemical constituent alone or in combination with others contributed the largest influence that explained the basis for the detected variations between the cocoa bean samples.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

PCA loadings of the top three latent variables of cocoa bean samples.

3.4. Performance of Classification Models

A qualitative analysis such as RF, KNN, LDA, and PLS-DA was performed as the PCA was not able to accurately classify the samples according to organic and conventional cocoa beans. The results from different classification models for the discrimination of organic and conventional cocoa beans are reported in Table 3. Every multivariate classification algorithm has its potentials and limitations. As shown in Table 3, the SD processing (17-point window, 2nd-order polynomial) highly enhanced the performance of all the multivariate classification algorithms in both the calibration set and prediction set than MC and FD.

Table 3.

Classification models with preprocessing algorithms for cocoa bean samples.

Models Preprocessing PCs Evaluation Performance (%)
Calibration set Prediction set
RF Raw 3 Accuracy 67.79 67.31
Sensitivity 69.23 69.23
Specificity 66.35 65.38
Efficiency 67.77 67.28
MC 7 Accuracy 85.58 88.46
Sensitivity 82.69 84.62
Specificity 88.46 92.31
Efficiency 85.53 88.38
FD 7 Accuracy 89.90 88.46
Sensitivity 90.65 91.30
Specificity 89.11 86.21
Efficiency 89.88 88.72
SD 9 Accuracy 96.15 98.08
Sensitivity 94.95 96.77
Specificity 97.25 100.00
Efficiency 96.09 98.37
KNN Raw 3 Accuracy 65.38% 69.23
Sensitivity 71.29% 62.07
Specificity 59.81% 78.26
Efficiency 65.30% 69.70
MC 5 Accuracy 79.81 82.69
Sensitivity 82.86 76.00
Specificity 76.70 88.89
Efficiency 79.72 82.19
FD 5 Accuracy 80.77 80.77
Sensitivity 75.76 83.87
Specificity 85.32 76.19
Efficiency 80.40 79.94
SD 5 Accuracy 91.35 92.31
Sensitivity 87.27 95.00
Specificity 95.92 90.63
Efficiency 91.49 92.79
LDA Raw 3 Accuracy 69.71 69.23
Sensitivity 72.38 64.00
Specificity 66.99 74.07
Efficiency 69.63 68.85
MC 5 Accuracy 84.13 78.85
Sensitivity 86.14 86.21
Specificity 82.24 69.57
Efficiency 84.17 77.44
FD 5 Accuracy 78.85 80.77
Sensitivity 83.65 88.46
Specificity 74.04 73.08
Efficiency 78.70 80.40
SD 5 Accuracy 90.38 98.08
Sensitivity 89.42 100.00
Specificity 91.35 96.15
Efficiency 90.38 98.06
PLS-DA Raw 3 Accuracy 77.88 78.85
Sensitivity 80.81 83.87
Specificity 75.23 71.43
Efficiency 77.97 77.40
MC 5 Accuracy 92.79 94.23
Sensitivity 96.97 90.32
Specificity 88.99 100.00
Efficiency 92.89 95.04
FD 5 Accuracy 98.56 100.00
Sensitivity 99.04 100.00
Specificity 98.08 100.00
Efficiency 98.56 100.00
SD 5 Accuracy 100.00 100.00
Sensitivity 100.00 100.00
Specificity 100.00 100.00
Efficiency 100.00 100.00

3.4.1. RF

The k-fold cross-validation results showed that the RF algorithm with 9 PCs on normalized data provided correct identification rates with 96.09% and 98.37% efficiency in the calibration set and prediction set, respectively (Table 3). The optimum number of PCs was based on the best classification rate performed by k-fold cross-validation. In Table 3, the best classification rate by RF model for calibration set was 96.15% and 98.08% for the prediction set at an optimum number of 9 PCs.

3.4.2. KNN

In Table 3, the k-fold cross-validation outcomes disclosed that the KNN algorithm with PCs equals 5 on normalized data provided a correct classification rate with 91.49% efficiency for the calibration set and 92.79% for the prediction set. Table 3 demonstrates that the best classification rate for the calibration set was 91.35% and 92.31% for the prediction set.

3.4.3. LDA

In Table 3, the k-fold cross-validation results showed that the LDA algorithm with PCs equals 5 on normalized data provided a correct classification rate with 90.38% calibration set efficiency and 98.06% prediction set efficiency. Table 3 demonstrates that the best classification rate for the calibration set was 90.38% and 98.08% for the prediction set.

3.4.4. PLS-DA Model

Table 3 shows the performance of the PLS-DA classification algorithm used in identifying organic and conventional cocoa beans. k-fold cross-validation outcomes demonstrated that the PLS-DA technique with 5 principal components (PCs) on normalized data provided correct identification rates with 100% efficiency in the prediction set. Figure 5 displays the performance of the PLS-DA model for solving the discrimination problems after k-fold cross-validation. The optimum number of PCs was based on the best classification accuracy achieved by k-fold cross-validation. In Table 3, the best classification rate for both calibration set and prediction set was 100.00% at an optimum number of 5 PCs.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The k-fold cross-validation discrimination rates of second derivative preprocessed PLS-DA models at 5 PCs.

3.5. Overall Performance of Classification Algorithms

The identification rates of multivariate classification algorithms are presented in Table 4. In this table, we compare the classification accuracy of the RF, KNN, LDA, and PLS-DA models. Comparatively, the results show that the performance of the PLS-DA established model was superior to others, viz., RF, KNN, and LDA (Table 4). The result is in agreement with that of [56] where the PLS-DA technique performed better in the identification of sorghum cultivars. The discrimination stability for all the cocoa bean samples investigated increased in the order of KNN < LDA < RF < PLS-DA denoted by identification rate.

Table 4.

Overall performance of classification algorithms.

Models Total cocoa bean samples PCs Identification rate (%)
Calibration set Prediction set Calibration set Prediction set
RF 182 78 9 96.15 98.08
KNN 182 78 5 91.35 92.31
LDA 182 78 5 90.38 98.08
PLS-DA 182 78 5 100.00 100.00

3.6. Discussion

There were observed differences in chemical compositions of organic cocoa beans and conventional ones (as seen in Table 1). These could largely be attributed to the influence of production methods and partly to the reaction of inherent compositions of the organic and conventional cocoa beans to the fermentation process (which was carried out using the same protocols for both categories of cocoa beans). Chocolate flavour compounds do not only originate by character precursor formation during fermentation but could also be generated during production management systems [57]. Thus, the composition of organic and conventional cocoa beans interacted with the fermentation process in the formation of cocoa flavour quality constituents. The use of synthetic fertilizers and chemicals in conventional method contributed to variations in the cocoa bean biochemical composition that could lead to a distinct cluster trend.

The spectra obtained from scanning of the organic and conventional cocoa bean samples with the handheld NIR spectrometer produced a spectral profile that displayed multiple wavelength bands and peaks as shown in Figure 1(d). The bands consisted of overtones and combinations of fundamental vibrations that matched the chemical compositions which provided exclusive fingerprint of the cocoa bean categories employed in this study. The preprocessing of the spectra profile into mean was performed, and there were two groupings representing the two distinct cocoa bean samples used as seen in Figure 2. This is due to the unique biochemical and physical properties of each bean group to give a well-defined separation trend.

The comparative analysis of the PCA cluster using different preprocessing techniques revealed that the second derivative treatment performed better by showing a clear cluster trend as shown in Figure 3. The clustering can be explained by the biochemical compositions in each of the cocoa bean samples as a result of differences in the categories of the cocoa bean either been organic or conventionally produced cocoa bean. The contributions of the three topmost PCs were 92.92% for the total variance in the original data. Nevertheless, PCA does not give definite identification because it is not a classification tool; however, it preserves much variance in a high-dimensional space by reducing dimensionality. PCA loading plot in Figure 4 shows the most important wavelength bands which contributed to the cluster trend of the cocoa bean samples and were located at around 986, 1200, 1280, 1417, and 1068 nm for PC1; 958, 973, 1395, and 1460 nm for PC2; and 1005, 1440, and 1483 nm for PC3. The wavelengths at 958, 973, 986, 1440, and 1460 nm are due to 1st overtone and 2nd overtone of O-H/O-H stretch; 1005 and 1483 nm are attributable to 2nd overtones of N-H stretch; 1200 and 1608 nm are related to C-O from COOH typical and 1st overtone of C-H stretch; 1280 nm band might be characterised by 2nd overtone bands C-H bond stretching; 1375 and 1417 nm could be associated with C-H vibration modes; 1395 nm and 1417 nm absorption band might correspond to 2x C-H stretch+C-H deformation and combination. These observable wavelengths are principally characterised by the asymmetric stretching, overtones, and combinations of vibrations of C-H, N-H, O-H, and C=O which are triggered by constituents such as fats, water, polyphenols, fibre, organic acids, alkaloids, polysaccharides, amines, and aromatic compounds found in cocoa beans ([4345]; Zhang et al. [53]). Table 2 gives additional information on the observable absorption bands and their associated chemical constituents. These spectra observations echoed the outcome of the chemical compositions of the two categories of cocoa beans studied. These spectral wavelength bands might have significantly contributed to the classification of organic and conventional cocoa beans as seen in Table 3.

Four other pattern recognition algorithms which are known to have potentials in solving identification problems were applied. The pattern recognition algorithms such as RF, KNN, LDA, and PLS-DA were applied to build a classification model and to ensure their stability cross-validation was done. PLS-DA model produced classification accuracy of 100.00% in both the calibration set and prediction set, whereas the classification accuracies for the calibration set and prediction set were 96.15% and 98.08% for RF, 91.35% and 92.31% for KNN, and 90.38% and 98.08% for LDA (Table 4). The experimental outcomes showed that the PLS-DA algorithm was superior to RF, KNN, and LDA algorithms. This can be due to the fact that the PLS-DA algorithm possesses stronger and added potential of self-adjusting and self-learning properties. For cocoa bean categories used in this work, the biochemical compositions and complex organoleptic properties can explain why RF, KNN, and LDA could not deliver the optimum solution. The PLS-DA delivered its best performance at 5 PCs. High number of PCs as seen in the RF model may result in low generalization in the performance lowering the efficiency of its model.

Generally, the optimum classification accuracy (100%) received could largely be attributed to the influence of production methods and partly to the reaction of inherent compositions of the organic and conventional cocoa beans to the fermentation. Cocoa bean flavour compounds do not only originate by character precursor formation during fermentation but could also be generated during production management systems [57]. Thus, the composition of organic and conventional cocoa beans interacted with the fermentation process in the formation of cocoa flavour quality constituents. The use of synthetic fertilizers and chemicals in the conventional method contributed to variations in the cocoa bean biochemical composition leading to the distinct cluster trends and differentiation of the cocoa samples used in this experiment. Also, according to other authors, organically produced foods show high polyphenols and ascorbic acid contents as a response to stress stimuli [58]. More so, organic crops often grow more slowly compared to synthetic fertilized crops with readily available mineral nutrients and this might reduce their water content leading to a higher concentration of some plant compounds [59]. It is therefore expected that organically produced cocoa will have higher concentrations of some compounds (polyphenols, protein, carbohydrate, fibre, and total flavonoids) as recorded in this study. This phenomenon might have contributed to the accurate classification of the different categories of cocoa beans used in this study by the handheld NIR spectroscopy.

4. Conclusions

This work represents the first study to successfully evaluate the application of a low-cost handheld NIR spectrometer and chemometric classification techniques for rapid nondestructive screening and authentication of organic and conventional cocoa beans produced in Ghana. The PCA score plot exhibited the feasibility of identifying cocoa bean categories. Four different chemometric classification algorithms, viz., RF, KNN, LDA, and PLS-DA, were comparatively performed for the construction of classification models. PLS-DA exhibited superior performance over the others (RF, KNN, and LDA) after second derivative (SD) preprocessing for the differentiation of organic cocoa beans from conventional ones. PLS-DA model yielded classification accuracy of 100% in both calibration set and prediction set. The application of handheld NIR spectrometer and PLS-DA algorithms could be employed as a simple, on-site, cost-effective, rapid, and ecofriendly technique for accurate identification of organic cocoa beans and conventional ones to prevent fraud and ensure the integrity of organic cocoa beans.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Rapid Non-destructive Techniques for Food Safety and Fraud Research Group, Department of Agricultural Engineering, School of Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Cape Coast. We acknowledge the assistance offered by Dr. Charles L. Y. Amuah of the Department of Physics, Laser and Fibre Optics Centre, School of Physical Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.

Data Availability

The dataset used is available from the corresponding author upon judicious request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest concerning the publication of this article.

References

  • 1.Bitzer V., Glasbergen P., Leroy P. Partnerships of a feather flock together? An analysis of the emergence of networks of partnerships in the global cocoa sector. Global Networks . 2012;12(3):355–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2011.00359.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oosterveer P., Van Hoi P., Glin L. Governance and Greening Global Agro-Food Chains: Cases from Vietnam . Thailand and Benin: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berlan A., Bergés A. Cocoa Production in the Dominican Republic: Sustainability, Challenges and Opportunities . Commissioned by Green & Black’s; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Poelmans E., Rousseau S. How do chocolate lovers balance taste and ethical considerations? British Food Journal . 2016;118(2):343–361. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-06-2015-0208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Glin L. C., Oosterveer P., Mol A. P. Governing the organic cocoa network from Ghana: towards hybrid governance arrangements? Journal of Agrarian Change . 2015;15(1):43–64. doi: 10.1111/joac.12059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gomiero T., Pimentel D., Paoletti M. G. Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: conventional vs. organic agriculture. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences . 2011;30(1-2):95–124. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2011.554355. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Magkos F., Arvaniti F., Zampelas A. Organic food: buying more safety or just peace of mind? A critical review of the literature. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition . 2006;46(1):23–56. doi: 10.1080/10408690490911846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pay E. Increasing incomes and food security of small farmers in West and Central Africa through exports of organic and fair-trade tropical products . Rome: The market for organic and fair-trade mangoes and pineapples, study prepared in the framework of FAO project GCP/RAF/404/GER, FAO of the United Nations, trade and markets division,; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bolwig S., Gibbon P., Jones S. The economics of smallholder organic contract farming in tropical Africa. World Development . 2009;37(6):1094–1104. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.09.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Owureku-Asare M., Agyei-Amponsah J., Agbemavor S. W., et al. Effect of organic fertilizers on physical and chemical quality of sugar loaf pineapple (Ananas comosus L) grown in two ecological sites in Ghana. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development . 2015;15(2):9982–9995. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Teye E., Anyidoho E., Agbemafle R., Sam-Amoah L. K., Elliott C. Cocoa bean and cocoa bean products quality evaluation by NIR spectroscopy and chemometrics: a review. Infrared Physics & Technology . 2019;104:p. 103127. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nicolai B. M., Beullens K., Bobelyn E., et al. Nondestructive measurement of fruit and vegetable quality by means of NIR spectroscopy: a review. Postharvest Biology and Technology . 2007;46(2):99–118. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.06.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Veselá A., Barros A. S., Synytsya A., Delgadillo I., Čopíková J., Coimbra M. A. Infrared spectroscopy and outer product analysis for quantification of fat, nitrogen, and moisture of cocoa powder. Analytica Chimica Acta . 2007;601(1):77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.WHITACRE E., LIVER J. O., BROEK R., et al. Predictive analysis of cocoa procyanidins using near-infrared spectroscopy techniques. Journal of Food Science . 2003;68(9):2618–2622. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05779.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Teye E., Huang X., Dai H., Chen Q. Rapid differentiation of Ghana cocoa beans by FT-NIR spectroscopy coupled with multivariate classification. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy . 2013;114:183–189. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2013.05.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Teye E., Huang X., Takrama J., Haiyang G. Integrating NIR spectroscopy and electronic tongue together with chemometric analysis for accurate classification of cocoa bean varieties. Journal of Food Process Engineering . 2014;37(6):560–566. doi: 10.1111/jfpe.12109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Trilčová A., Čopíková J., Coimbra M., et al. Application of NIR analysis to verify cocoa powder authenticity. Czech Journal of Food Sciences . 2004;22(SI - Chem. Reactions in Foods V):S329–S332. doi: 10.17221/10694-CJFS. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Barbin D. F., Maciel L. F., Bazoni C. H. V., et al. Classification and compositional characterization of different varieties of cocoa beans by near infrared spectroscopy and multivariate statistical analyses. Journal of Food Science and Technology . 2018;55(7):2457–2466. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3163-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Krähmer A., Engel A., Kadow D., et al. Fast and neat - determination of biochemical quality parameters in cocoa using near infrared spectroscopy. Food Chemistry . 2015;181:152–159. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kutsanedzie F. Y., Chen Q., Sun H., Cheng W. In situ cocoa beans quality grading by near-infrared-chemodyes systems. Analytical Methods . 2017;9(37):5455–5463. doi: 10.1039/C7AY01751K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Teye E., Huang X., Sam-Amoah L. K., et al. Estimating cocoa bean parameters by FT-NIRS and chemometrics analysis. Food Chemistry . 2015;176:403–410. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Quelal-Vásconez M. A., Lerma-García M. J., Pérez-Esteve É., Arnau-Bonachera A., Barat J. M., Talens P. Fast detection of cocoa shell in cocoa powders by near infrared spectroscopy and multivariate analysis. Food Control . 2019;99:68–72. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.12.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Quelal-Vásconez M. A., Pérez-Esteve É., Arnau-Bonachera A., Barat J. M., Talens P. Rapid fraud detection of cocoa powder with carob flour using near infrared spectroscopy. Food Control . 2018;92:183–189. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hashimoto J. C., Lima J. C., Celeghini R. M., et al. Quality control of commercial cocoa beans (Theobroma cacao L.) by near-infrared spectroscopy. Food Analytical Methods . 2018;11(5):1510–1517. doi: 10.1007/s12161-017-1137-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Afoakwa E. O., Quao J., Takrama J., Budu A. S., Saalia F. K. Chemical composition and physical quality characteristics of Ghanaian cocoa beans as affected by pulp pre-conditioning and fermentation. Journal of Food Science and Technology . 2013;50(6):1097–1105. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0446-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jha S., Garg R. Non-destructive prediction of quality of intact apple using near infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Food Science and Technology . 2010;47(2):207–213. doi: 10.1007/s13197-010-0033-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rinnan Å., Van Den Berg F., Engelsen S. B. Review of the most common pre-processing techniques for near-infrared spectra. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry . 2009;28(10):1201–1222. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2009.07.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Siesler H. W., Ozaki Y., Kawata S., Heise H. M. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: Principles, Instruments, Applications . John Wiley & Sons; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lavine B. K., Mirjankar N. Clustering and Classification of Analytical Data . Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry: Applications, Theory and Instrumentation; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Svetnik V., Liaw A., Tong C., Culberson J. C., Sheridan R. P., Feuston B. P. Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences . 2003;43(6):1947–1958. doi: 10.1021/ci034160g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kulkarni A. D., Lowe B. Random Forest Algorithm for Land Cover Classification . New York: Springer; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cutler D. R., Edwards T. C., Jr., Beard K. H., et al. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology . 2007;88(11):2783–2792. doi: 10.1890/07-0539.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Thanh Noi P., Kappas M. Comparison of random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification using Sentinel-2 imagery. Sensors . 2018;18(1):p. 18. doi: 10.3390/s18010018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Berrueta L. A., Alonso-Salces R. M., Héberger K. Supervised pattern recognition in food analysis. Journal of Chromatography A . 2007;1158(1-2):196–214. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chen Q., Cai J., Wan X., Zhao J. Application of linear/non-linear classification algorithms in discrimination of pork storage time using Fourier transform near infrared (FT-NIR) spectroscopy. LWT- Food Science and Technology . 2011;44(10):2053–2058. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.05.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee L. C., Liong C.-Y., Jemain A. A. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) for classification of high-dimensional (HD) data: a review of contemporary practice strategies and knowledge gaps. Analyst . 2018;143(15):3526–3539. doi: 10.1039/C8AN00599K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tres A., van Ruth S. M. Verification of organic feed identity by fatty acid fingerprinting. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . 2011;59(16):8816–8821. doi: 10.1021/jf2016682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dong G., Guo J., Wang C., Chen Z., Zheng L., Zhu D. The classification of wheat varieties based on near infrared hyperspectral imaging and information fusion. Guang pu xue yu Guang pu fen xi= Guang pu . 2015;35(12):3369–3374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ballabio D., Consonni V. Classification tools in chemistry. Part 1: linear models. PLS-DA. Analytical Methods : Advancing Methods and Applications . 2013;5(16):3790–3798. doi: 10.1039/c3ay40582f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wang Q.-Q., Huang H.-Y., Wang Y.-Z. Geographical authentication of Macrohyporia cocos by a data fusion method combining ultra-fast liquid chromatography and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Molecules . 2019;24(7):p. 1320. doi: 10.3390/molecules24071320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chen Q., Zhao J., Liu M., Cai J., Liu J. Determination of total polyphenols content in green tea using FT-NIR spectroscopy and different PLS algorithms. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis . 2008;46(3):568–573. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2007.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhang M., Luypaert J., Pierna J. F., Xu Q., Massart D. Determination of total antioxidant capacity in green tea by near-infrared spectroscopy and multivariate calibration. Talanta . 2004;62(1):25–35. doi: 10.1016/S0039-9140(03)00397-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Arslan M., Xiaobo Z., Xuetao H., et al. Near infrared spectroscopy coupled with chemometric algorithms for predicting chemical components in black goji berries (Lycium ruthenicum Murr.) Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy . 2018;26(5):275–286. doi: 10.1177/0967033518795597. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hourant P., Baeten V., Morales M. T., Meurens M., Aparicio R. Oil and fat classification by selected bands of near-infrared spectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy . 2000;54(8):1168–1174. doi: 10.1366/0003702001950733. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Oliveira L. S., Franca A. S. Applications of near infrafred spectroscopy (NIRS) in food quality evaluation. Food Quality: Control, Analysis and Consumer Concerns . 2011;4(3):131–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang C., Shen Y., Chen J., Xiao P., Bao J. Nondestructive prediction of total phenolics, flavonoid contents, and antioxidant capacity of rice grain using near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . 2008;56(18):8268–8272. doi: 10.1021/jf801830z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ozaki Y., McClure W. F., Christy A. A. Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Food Science and Technology . John Wiley & Sons; 2006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sun M., Zhang D., Liu L., Wang Z. How to predict the sugariness and hardness of melons: a near-infrared hyperspectral imaging method. Food Chemistry . 2017;218:413–421. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang H., Peng J., Xie C., Bao Y., He Y. Fruit quality evaluation using spectroscopy technology: a review. Sensors . 2015;15(5):11889–11927. doi: 10.3390/s150511889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bao Y., Mi C., Wu N., Liu F., He Y. Rapid classification of wheat grain varieties using hyperspectral imaging and chemometrics. Applied Sciences . 2019;9(19):p. 4119. doi: 10.3390/app9194119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Polívka T., Chábera P., Kerfeld C. A. Carotenoid-protein interaction alters the S1 energy of hydroxyechinenone in the orange carotenoid protein. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics . 2013;1827(3):248–254. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rout S. P., Acharya R., Maji J. K. Discriminant analysis of Shodhana (processing) on Baliospermum montanum Muell (Danti) root samples based on near infrared spectroscopy and multivariate chemometric technique. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences . 2017;9(7) doi: 10.22159/ijpps.2017v9i7.18272. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Zhang C., Liu F., He Y. Identification of coffee bean varieties using hyperspectral imaging: influence of preprocessing methods and pixel-wise spectra analysis. Scientific Reports . 2018;8(1):2111–2166. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20270-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Phuangsombut K., Suttiwijitpukdee N., Terdwongworakul A. Nondestructive classification of mung bean seeds by single kernel near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences . 2017;10(3):p. 1650053. doi: 10.1142/S179354581650053X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kays S. E., Shimizu N., Barton F. E., Ohtsubo K. i. Near-infrared transmission and reflectance spectroscopy for the determination of dietary fiber in barley cultivars. Crop Science . 2005;45(6):2307–2311. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kosmowski F., Worku T. Evaluation of a miniaturized NIR spectrometer for cultivar identification: the case of barley, chickpea and sorghum in Ethiopia. PLoS One . 2018;13(3):p. e0193620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Afoakwa E. O., Paterson A., Fowler M., Ryan A. Flavor formation and character in cocoa and chocolate: a critical review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition . 2008;48(9):840–857. doi: 10.1080/10408390701719272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hurtado-Barroso S., Tresserra-Rimbau A., Vallverdú-Queralt A., Lamuela-Raventós R. M. Organic food and the impact on human health. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition . 2019;59(4):704–714. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1394815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Heeb A., Lundegårdh B., Savage G., Ericsson T. Impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on yield, taste, and nutritional quality of tomatoes. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science . 2006;169(4):535–541. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200520553. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset used is available from the corresponding author upon judicious request.


Articles from International Journal of Food Science are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES