Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2021 Nov 15;17(11):e1009893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009893

JNK and Yorkie drive tumor malignancy by inducing L-amino acid transporter 1 in Drosophila

Bojie Cong 1, Mai Nakamura 1, Yukari Sando 1, Takefumi Kondo 2,3, Shizue Ohsawa 4, Tatsushi Igaki 1,*
Editor: Norbert Perrimon5
PMCID: PMC8629376  PMID: 34780467

Abstract

Identifying a common oncogenesis pathway among tumors with different oncogenic mutations is critical for developing anti-cancer strategies. Here, we performed transcriptome analyses on two different models of Drosophila malignant tumors caused by Ras activation with cell polarity defects (RasV12/scrib-/-) or by microRNA bantam overexpression with endocytic defects (bantam/rab5-/-), followed by an RNAi screen for genes commonly essential for tumor growth and malignancy. We identified that Juvenile hormone Inducible-21 (JhI-21), a Drosophila homolog of the L-amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1), is upregulated in these malignant tumors with different oncogenic mutations and knocking down of JhI-21 strongly blocked their growth and invasion. JhI-21 expression was induced by simultaneous activation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and Yorkie (Yki) in these tumors and thereby contributed to tumor growth and progression by activating the mTOR-S6 pathway. Pharmacological inhibition of LAT1 activity in Drosophila larvae significantly suppressed growth of RasV12/scrib-/- tumors. Intriguingly, LAT1 inhibitory drugs did not suppress growth of bantam/rab5-/- tumors and overexpression of bantam rendered RasV12/scrib-/- tumors unresponsive to LAT1 inhibitors. Further analyses with RNA sequencing of bantam-expressing clones followed by an RNAi screen suggested that bantam induces drug resistance against LAT1 inhibitors via downregulation of the TMEM135-like gene CG31157. Our observations unveil an evolutionarily conserved role of LAT1 induction in driving Drosophila tumor malignancy and provide a powerful genetic model for studying cancer progression and drug resistance.

Author summary

Cancers develop through the accumulation of multiple oncogenic mutations. Such mutations are different among tumors of different origins and thus identification of a common oncogenesis pathway among different tumors is crucial for developing effective anti-cancer strategies. Here, using fruit fly Drosophila as a model organism, we searched for a common oncogenesis pathway between two malignant tumor models with different oncogenic alterations, namely oncogenic Ras activation with cell polarity defects (RasV12/scrib-/-) and oncogenic microRNA bantam overexpression with endocytic defects (bantam/rab5-/-). Transcriptome analyses followed by an RNAi screen identified Juvenile hormone Inducible-21 (JhI-21), a Drosophila homolog of the L-amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1), as essential for growth and malignancy of these tumor models. Similar to mammalian cancers, JhI-21 was upregulated in these tumors and promoted tumor growth and progression by activating the mTOR-S6 pathway. Administration of LAT1 inhibitors to flies significantly suppressed growth of RasV12/scrib-/-, but not bantam/rab5-/- tumors. Our analyses revealed that bantam induces drug resistance against LAT1 inhibitors via downregulation of the TMEM135-like gene CG31157. Our observations establish a powerful genetic model for studying cancer progression and drug resistance in Drosophila.

Introduction

Cancer development is achieved by the accumulation of oncogenic mutations that promote cell proliferation, survival, invasion, and metastasis. Mutations that drive tumor growth and malignancy are different between tumors and thus identification of a common oncogenesis pathway among tumors with different oncogenic alterations is crucial for establishing effective anti-cancer strategies.

In recent years, amino acid transporter, especially L-amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1), has been attracting attention as a potential therapeutic target for cancer. LAT1 is a plasma membrane transporter for branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) such as leucine and isoleucine[1], thereby promoting tumor growth by activating mTOR signaling[2]. LAT1 acts as a protein complex composed of LAT1 covalently bound to 4F2 Heavy Chain Antigen (CD98/SLC3A2)[3]. CD98 promotes LAT1 protein stability and mediates the translocation of LAT1 to the cell membrane[3]. Studies in mammalian cells have shown that LAT1 is upregulated in neuroblastoma and Burkitt’s lymphoma cells via Myc[4] and in breast cancer cells via aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-mediated signaling[5]. Given that LAT1 expression is elevated in a variety of cancers, it is thought to be an ideal therapeutic target as a component of a common oncogenesis pathway and is thus currently under clinical trial in cancer patients[2,6]. However, genetic complexity and heterogenous nature of cancer have hindered progress in understanding the mechanism of the common genetic pathway of tumor growth and malignancy in mammalian systems.

The genetic mosaic technique available in Drosophila provides an ideal model system to study tumor growth and progression with genetically traceable oncogenic mutations. Indeed, previous studies in Drosophila imaginal epithelium have identified critical mechanisms by which accumulation of distinct oncogenic alterations drives tumor malignancy. For instance, clones of Ras-activated benign tumors are transformed into malignant tumors when simultaneously mutated for an apicobasal polarity gene such as scribble (scrib)[7,8]. In addition, clones of cells activating Ras and Src signaling develop into invasive tumors under high-sugar diet condition[9].

Here, through a transcriptome analysis combined with Drosophila genetics, we searched for a common pathway of oncogenesis among different types of Drosophila malignant tumors. By an unbiased transcriptome analysis, we found that LAT1 expression was commonly elevated in Drosophila malignant tumors with different oncogenic mutations. Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of LAT1 significantly blocked tumor growth and malignancy in these tumors. Our findings unveil an evolutionarily conserved role of LAT1 induction in tumor progression and provide a novel genetic model for analyzing cancer progression and drug resistance.

Results

JhI-21/LAT1 is required for tumor growth and invasion in Drosophila

In Drosophila imaginal epithelia, clones of cells overexpressing oncogenic RasV12 with simultaneous mutations in apico-basal polarity genes such as scribble (scrib) or discs large (dlg) result in tumorous overgrowth and metastatic behavior, the best-characterized model of Drosophila malignant tumors[7,8] (Fig 1b, compare to Fig 1a). To study a common pathway of oncogenesis among different types of malignant tumors, we first tried to establish another model of Drosophila malignant tumors using different oncogenic mutations. As a result, we found that loss-of-function mutations in a tumor-suppressor gene rab5[10], a small GTPase essential for generating early endosomes[11], in clones of cells overexpressing a pro-growth microRNA bantam (bantam/rab5-/- cells), a target of the Hippo pathway effector Yorkie (Yki), in the eye discs resulted in drastic tumor growth and malignant invasion to adjacent organ ventral nerve cord (VNC) (Figs 1c and S1e, quantified in S1f Fig). Notably, overexpression of bantam alone or rab5 mutation alone caused neither tumor growth (S1a and S1c Fig, quantified in S1f Fig) nor metastatic invasion (S1b and S1d Fig), suggesting an oncogenic cooperation between these alterations. Thus, we established a new model of Drosophila malignant tumors caused by bantam overexpression with rab5 defect.

Fig 1. L-amino acid transporter is required for tumor growth and progression.

Fig 1

(a, b, c and l) Images of cephalic complexes, which include brain and the ventral nerve cord (VNC). Wild-type (a) and RasV12/scrib-/- or bantam/rab5-/- tumors showing VNC invasion at 9 days after egg laying are shown (arrowheads, 63% of animals show VNC invasion, n = 16 (b); 68% of animals show VNC invasion, n = 31 (c)). At 7 days after egg laying, RasV12/scrib-/- +JhI-21-RNAi flies did not show VNC invasion (0% of animals, n = 19 (l)). (d) Transcriptional profiling of wild-type cells (WT) or tumor cells by RNA-seq was performed with mRNA isolated from FACS-sorted GFP+ cells. (e) Venn diagram of RNA-seq shows the number of genes whose expressions were changed relative to Wild-type (WT) (PDR<0.05) in eye/antennal imaginal discs bearing bantam/rab5-/- (2,471 genes) or RasV12/scrib-/- (4,553 genes). 1,734 genes were overlapped in both bantam/rab5-/- and RasV12/scrib-/- cells. (f) Representative genes whose expression levels were upregulated in both bantam/rab5-/- and RasV12/scrib-/- tumor cells compared to WT. (g, h, j, k, l, m and n) Eye-antennal discs bearing GFP-labeled RasV12/scrib-/- (g and h), RasV12/scrib-/- + JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271) (j, k and l), Wild-type (m), and JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271) (n) clones were shown. (h, i and k) Adult eye phenotypes, lethality (h), Wild-type (i) and RasV12/scrib-/- + JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271) (k) are shown. Larvae bearing bantam/rab5-/- or RasV12/scrib-/- tumors in the eye-antennal discs failed to develop into adult flies. (o) Average sizes of Wild-type (n = 26), JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271, n = 22), JhI-21-RNAi (KK112996, n = 18), RasV12/scrib-/- (n = 41), and RasV12/scrib-/- +JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271, n = 23), RasV12/scrib-/- +JhI-21-RNAi (KK112996, n = 24) clones were measured by ImageJ. Scale bars, 50 μm. See S3 Table for details of statistical analyses.

Using these two malignant tumor models with distinct oncogenic mutations, we performed RNA sequence (RNA-seq) analyses from GFP-labeled fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-sorted RasV12/scrib-/- or bantam/rab5-/- cells compared to GFP-labeled wild-type cells (Fig 1d). We identified 4,553 and 2,471 genes that are significantly upregulated or downregulated in RasV12/scrib-/- and bantam/rab5-/- cells, respectively, and 1,734 genes that are commonly upregulated (1,028 genes) or downregulated (706 genes) in both tumors compared to wild-type cells (Fig 1e and S1 Table, false discovery rate (FDR)< 0.05). Among 1,028 commonly upregulated genes, we found JNK signaling targets such as mmp1[12] and puckered (puc)[13], JAK/STAT signaling targets such as upd1, upd2, and upd3[14], and Yki targets such as expanded, cycE, and crb[15] (Fig 1f and S1 Table), which are consistent with previous reports for the upregulated genes in RasV12/scrib-/- tumors[1618]. These data validate our experimental conditions and suggest that these malignant tumors with distinct mutant origins share common downstream signaling to induce tumor growth and invasion.

We next performed an RNAi screen to identify common essential components for driving tumor growth and invasion in commonly upregulated genes. Among 75 upregulated genes (S1 Table), we found that knocking down of JhI-21 (a LAT1 homolog[19]), minidiscs (mnd, a y+LAT1 homolog), cacophony (cac, a voltage-gated calcium channel) or Calmodulin (Cam) significantly suppressed RasV12/scrib-/- or RasV12/dlg-/- tumor growth (Fig 1g, quantified in Fig 1o; S1g Fig). The strongest effect was observed by JhI-21 knockdown (using two different RNAi lines HMS02271 and KK112996; Fig 1o). Although the stronger JhI-21 knockdown (HMS02271) suppressed growth of wild-type clones (Fig 1m’ and 1n’, quantified in Fig 1o), which suggests that JhI-21 is essential for normal tissue growth, it completely abolished tumor growth and invasion of RasV12/scrib-/- or bantam/rab5-/- tumors (Fig 1j’, compare to Fig 1g’, quantified in Fig 1o; Fig 1l, compare to Fig 1b; S1j Fig, compared to S1h Fig, quantified in S1l Fig) and rescued lethality of animals bearing these tumors (Fig 1k, compare to Fig 1h and 1i; S1k Fig, compared to S1i Fig). Together, these data indicate that RasV12/scrib-/- and bantam/rab5-/- malignant tumors upregulate JhI-21/LAT1, which is essential for their growth and invasion.

Activation of JNK and Yki upregulates JhI-21

LAT1 is a plasma membrane transporter for BCAAs such as leucine and isoleucine and is often upregulated in tumor cells, thereby promoting tumor growth[6]. However, the mechanism by which LAT1 is upregulated in various cancer cells is still unclear. We thus investigated the mechanism by which JhI-21 is upregulated in RasV12/scrib-/- or bantam/rab5-/- tumor cells. Consistent with the RNA-seq data, immunostaining for JhI-21 protein in the eye-antennal discs showed upregulation of JhI-21 in RasV12/scrib-/-. (Fig 2a, quantified in Fig 2g) or bantam/rab5-/- (S2b Fig) clones. In addition, qRT-PCR analysis confirmed that the level of JhI-21 mRNA expression was significantly upregulated in RasV12/scrib-/- cells compared to wild-type (S2a Fig). It has been reported that activation of JNK signaling is essential for overgrowth and invasion of RasV12/scrib-/- or RasV12/dlg-/- tumors[16]. Indeed, JNK activity was elevated in both RasV12/scrib-/- and bantam/rab5-/- tumors as visualized by the immunostaining of JNK target MMP1 (S2c and S2d Fig) as well as by the RNA-seq data showing upregulation of JNK targets mmp1 and puc (Fig 1e). Strikingly, blocking JNK signaling by overexpression of a dominant-negative form of the Drosophila JNK Bsk (BskDN) in RasV12/scrib-/- or bantam/rab5-/- tumors abolished JhI-21 induction in these tumors and blocked their growth (Fig 2b, quantified in Fig 2g; S2e Fig). This indicates that these tumors upregulate JhI-21 expression via JNK activation. However, JNK activation alone by overexpressing Eiger (a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) homolog that activates JNK signaling[20,21]) did not induce JhI-21 expression (Fig 2c, quantified in Fig 2g), suggesting that additional factor is required for JhI-21 induction in conjunction with JNK activation. Interestingly, we found that overexpression of a Hippo pathway component Warts (Wts, a Lats homolog that suppresses Yki/YAP activity[22]) in RasV12/scrib-/- tumors abolished the upregulation of JhI-21 (Fig 2d, quantified in Fig 2g), suggesting that Yki activity is also required for JhI-21 induction. Indeed, Yki activation was observed in both RasV12/scrib-/- and bantam/rab5-/- tumors, as visualized by Yki activity reporter expanded (ex)-lacZ or four-jointed (fj)-lacZ (Figs 2f and S2g) as well as by the RNA-seq data showing upregulation of Yki targets expanded, cycE, crb, and upd1 (Fig 1e and S1 Table). However, Yki activation alone by overexpressing an activated form of Yki (YkiS168A) did not cause JhI-21 induction (Fig 2e, quantified in Fig 2g). Significantly, we found that co-activation of JNK and Yki caused JhI-21 induction (Fig 2f, quantified in Fig 2g). These data indicate that activation of JNK and Yki in RasV12/scrib-/- or bantam/rab5-/- tumors cause upregulation of JhI-21 expression.

Fig 2. Co-activation of JNK and Yki upregulates JhI-21.

Fig 2

(a, b, c, d, e and f) GFP-labeled RasV12/scrib-/- (a), RasV12/scrib-/- +BskDN (b), Eiger (c), RasV12/scrib-/- +Wts (d), Yki (e), and Eiger +Yki (f) clones were induced in eye-antennal discs and were stained with anti-JhI-21 antibody. (g) The averaged normalized intensity of anti-JhI-21 staining in GFP+ cells in each genotype: Wild-type (n = 19), RasV12/scrib-/- (n = 22), RasV12/scrib-/- +BskDN (n = 23), Eiger (n = 9), RasV12/scrib-/- +Wts (n = 19), Yki (n = 14), Eiger +Yki (n = 11). The intensity was measured by ImageJ. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bars, 50 μm. See S3 Table for details of statistical analyses.

JhI-21 promotes mTOR-S6 signaling

We next invested the consequence of JhI-21 induction in tumor clones. JhI-21 and its mammalian homolog LAT1 play roles in uptalking leucine[1,19,23]. It has been reported that leucine uptake into the cell activates an evolutionarily conserved mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling in mammalian cells[24]. In the mTOR pathway, mTORC1 (mTOR kinase complex 1) directly phosphorylates S6 kinase 1 (S6K1), which phosphorylates ribosomal protein S6 (RpS6) and thus promotes protein translation[25]. It has been shown that LAT1 contributes to tumor growth by activating mTOR signaling[2]. We found that phosphorylation of RpS6 was significantly elevated in RasV12/scrib-/- and bantam/rab5-/- tumors (Fig 3a and 3b, quantified in Fig 3f), while RpS6 phosphorylation was not detected in scrib-/-, RasV12, or rab5-/- cells (S3b–S3d Fig, compare to S3a Fig, quantified in S3g Fig). On the other hand, moderate levels of RpS6 phosphorylation were observed in a part of bantam-expressing cells (S3e Fig, quantified in S3g Fig). Crucially, knockdown of JhI-21 strongly suppressed phosphorylation of RpS6 in both RasV12/scrib-/- and bantam/rab5-/- tumors (Fig 3c and 3d, quantified in Fig 3f). Western blot analysis for the phosphorylation of the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein (4EBP), an indicator of mTOR activation[26], confirmed that JhI-21 knockdown blocked mTOR signaling activation in RasV12/scrib-/- tumors (Fig 3g, quantified in S3h Fig). In addition, blocking mTOR signaling by knocking down of an upstream regulator of mTOR signaling Rheb[24] significantly suppressed RpS6 phosphorylation in RasV12/dlg-/- tumors (Fig 3e, compare to S3f Fig, quantified in Fig 3f) and tumor growth (Fig 3i, compare to Fig 3j, quantified in Fig 3k), while Rheb knockdown alone did not affect tissue growth (Fig 3h, quantified in Fig 3k). Together, these data suggest that JhI-21 upregulation promotes tumor growth by activating mTOR-S6 signaling in Drosophila.

Fig 3. JhI-21 contributes to tumor growth by activating the mTOR-S6 pathway.

Fig 3

(a, b, c, d and e) GFP-labeled RasV12/scrib-/- (a), bantam/Rab5DN (b), RasV12/scrib-/- +JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271) (c), bantam/Rab5DN +JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271) (d), and RasV12/dlg-/- +Rheb-RNAi (e) clones were induced in eye-antennal discs and were stained with anti-pS6 antibody. (f) The averaged normalized intensity of anti-pS6 staining in antennal GFP+ cells in each genotype: Wild-type (n = 17), RasV12/scrib-/- (n = 18), RasV12/scrib-/- +JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271) (n = 23), bantam/Rab5DN (n = 18), bantam/Rab5DN + JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271) (n = 18), RasV12/dlg-/- (n = 19), and RasV12/dlg-/- +Rheb-RNAi (n = 19). The intensity was measured by ImageJ. (g) Western blot analysis of p4EBP from Wild-type, RasV12/scrib-/- or RasV12/scrib-/- +JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271) eye-antennal discs. (h, i and j) GFP-labeled Rheb-RNAi (h), RasV12/dlg-/- +Rheb-RNAi (i), and RasV12/dlg-/- (j) clones were induced in eye-antennal discs. (k) Average sizes of Wild-type (n = 28), Rheb-RNAi (n = 18), RasV12/dlg-/- (n = 35), and RasV12/dlg-/- +Rheb-RNAi (n = 38) clones were measured by ImageJ. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bars, 50 μm. See S3 Table for details of statistical analyses.

Administration of LAT1 inhibitors reduces growth of RasV12/scrib-/- tumors

We next examined whether pharmacological inhibition of JhI-21 activity could suppress growth of malignant tumors in Drosophila. It is known that LAT1 inhibitors, 2-amino-2-Norbornanecarboxylic Acid (BCH) and KYT0353 (JPH203), suppress the activity of LAT1 in mammalian cells[6]. KYT0353 is currently being evaluated in a Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000034080). Notably, we found that feeding BCH or KYT0353 to larvae bearing RasV12/scrib-/- tumors in the eye-antennal discs significantly reduced tumor growth, while these drugs did not affect growth of wild-type clones (Figs 4a, 4b, S4a and S4b). Furthermore, BCH treatment significantly suppressed mTOR signaling activity in RasV12/scrib-/- tumors (S4c Fig). These data indicate that pharmacological inhibition of JhI-21 activity suppresses growth of RasV12/scrib-/- malignant tumors by downregulating mTOR signaling.

Fig 4. Tumor growth is attenuated by LAT1 inhibitors and bantam expression induces drug resistance.

Fig 4

(a, b, c and d) Quantification of average sizes of GFP+ clones of Wild-type, RasV12/scrib-/- (day7) (a and b), bantam/rab5-/- (day9) (a and b), RasV12/dlg-/- (day7) (c and d), and RasV12/dlg-/- +bantam (day6) (c and d) after larval administration of Vehicle, BCH or KYT0353. (a) Wild-type (n = 27), Wild-type +BCH (n = 28), RasV12/scrib-/- (n = 41), RasV12/scrib-/- +BCH (n = 30), bantam/rab5-/- (n = 49), bantam/rab5-/- +BCH (n = 40). (b) Wild-type +Vehicle (n = 30), Wild-type +KYT0353 (n = 30), RasV12/scrib-/- +Vehicle (n = 24), RasV12/scrib-/- +KYT0353 (n = 28), bantam/rab5-/- +Vehicle (n = 31), bantam/rab5-/- +KYT0353 (n = 15). (c) RasV12/dlg-/- (n = 19), RasV12/dlg-/- +BCH (n = 11), RasV12/dlg-/- +bantam (n = 24), RasV12/dlg-/- +bantam +BCH (n = 16). (d) RasV12/dlg-/- +Vehicle (n = 11), RasV12/dlg-/- +KYT0353 (n = 13), RasV12/dlg-/- +bantam + vehicle (n = 10), RasV12/dlg-/- +bantam +KYT0353 (n = 17). (e) Venn diagram of RNA-seq showing the number of genes whose expressions were changed relative to Wild-type (WT) (PDR<0.05) in eye/antennal imaginal discs bearing bantam/rab5-/- (2,471 genes), RasV12/scrib-/- (4,553 genes) or bantam (42 genes). (f, g and h) Eye-antennal discs bearing RasV12/dlg-/- (f) or RasV12/dlg-/- + CG31157-RNAi (GD3640) (g and h) clones in larvae after feeding with (f and g) or without BCH (h). (i) Quantification of average sizes of GFP+ clones of RasV12/dlg-/- + CG31157-RNAi (GD3640) (day7) in larvae after feeding with or without BCH. RasV12/dlg-/- + CG31157-RNAi (GD3640) (n = 26), RasV12/dlg-/- + CG31157-RNAi (GD3640) +BCH (n = 31). (j) Quantification of average sizes of GFP+ clones of bantam/rab5-/- or bantam/rab5-/-+ CG31157 (day7) in larvae after feeding with or without BCH. bantam/rab5-/- (n = 26), bantam/rab5-/- +BCH (n = 18), bantam/rab5-/- +CG31157 (n = 36), bantam/rab5-/- +CG31157 +BCH (n = 18). The average sizes of clones were measured by ImageJ. See S3 Table for details of statistical analyses.

MicroRNA bantam renders malignant tumors resistant to LAT1 inhibitors

To our surprise, BCH and KYT0353 did not suppress growth of bantam/rab5-/- tumors (Fig 4a and 4b). Consistent with this result, BCH treatment did not suppress mTOR signaling activity in bantam/rab5-/- tumors (S4c Fig). Notably, overexpression of bantam in RasV12/dlg-/- tumors abolished the suppressive effect of LAT1 inhibitors on their growth (Figs 4c, 4d, S4d and S4e). These data suggest that bantam renders malignant tumors resistant to LAT1 inhibitory drugs.

To identify gene(s) responsible for the drug resistance against LAT1 inhibitors upon bantam expression, we performed an RNA-seq analysis of FACS-sorted bantam-overexpressing cells compared to wild-type cells in the eye-antennal discs. Expression levels of 42 genes were significantly altered in bantam-overexpressing cells compared to wild-type cells, and among these 10 genes were commonly upregulated (3 genes) or downregulated (7 genes) in both bantam cells and bantam/rab5-/- tumors but not in RasV12/scrib-/- tumors (Fig 4e and S2 Table, false discovery rate (FDR)<0.05). Crucially, we found that knockdown of CG31157 (GD3640), one of the commonly downregulated 7 genes encoding a TMEM135-like protein, in RasV12/dlg-/- tumors abrogated tumor-suppressive effect of BCH (Fig 4g, compare to Fig 4f, quantified in Fig 4i), while knockdown of CG31157 (GD3640) on its own did not reduce RasV12/dlg-/- tumor burden or wild-type clone size (Figs 4h and S4f, quantified in Figs 4i and S4g). A similar result was obtained by using a different RNAi line for CG31157 (KK111271) (S4h Fig). Furthermore, bantam/rab5-/- tumors overexpressing CG31157 transgene became sensitive to BCH treatment (Fig 4j), indicating a critical role of CG31157 in drug responsiveness. Notably, CG31157 expression was significantly upregulated in RasV12/scrib-/- tumors (~1.7 fold, S2 Table), suggesting that CG31157 expression is critical for cells to acquire sensitivity to LAT1 inhibitors. These data suggest that bantam renders malignant tumors resistant to LAT1 inhibitory drugs via downregulation of TMEM135-like gene CG31157.

Discussion

Our genetic study using Drosophila tumor models revealed that activation of JNK and Yki drives tumor growth and malignancy by inducing JhI-21, a fly homolog of LAT1 (Fig 5). It has previously been shown that JhI-21 acts as an amino acid transporter that uptakes leucine into insulin producing cells (IPCs) in Drosophila larva and is required for leucine-dependent secretion of Drosophila insulin-like peptide 2 (Dilp2) from IPCs[23]. In this study, we found that JhI-21 is commonly upregulated in Drosophila malignant tumors and contributes to tumor growth and malignancy via activation of the mTOR-S6 pathway. Similar to mammalian systems, knockdown or pharmacological inhibition of JhI-21/LAT1 significantly reduced growth of malignant tumors. We also found that mnd was commonly upregulated in RasV12/scrib-/- and bantam/rab5-/- tumors and knockdown of mnd suppressed tumor growth. Mnd is an amino acid transporter belonging to LAT1 family, which catalyzes the cross-membrane flux of large neutral amino acids by forming heterodimers with CD98[19,27]. Thus, our data suggest that similar to mammalian cancers, elevation of LAT1 activity is critical for tumor growth and progression in Drosophila. This indicates that future studies on the common oncogenesis pathway in Drosophila could provide novel therapeutic strategies against human cancer.

Fig 5. A model for the induction of JhI-21/LAT1 promoting tumor progression.

Fig 5

Elevated activity of JNK and Yki in Drosophila tumors drives tumor growth and invasion by inducing JhI-21, which activates the mTOR-S6 pathway. Elevation of microRNA bantam renders tumors resistant to LAT1 inhibitors by downregulating a TMEM135-like gene CG31157.

Indeed, our data intriguingly show that overexpression of a pro-growth microRNA bantam rendered malignant tumors resistant to LAT1 inhibitory drugs. Our data suggest that the bantam-induced drug resistance against LAT1 inhibitors is due to downregulation of CG31157, which encodes a TMEM135-like protein that may regulate mitochondrial morphology and dynamics[28]. Thus, our observations not only show an evolutionarily conserved role of LAT1 induction in driving tumor malignancy but provide a useful genetic model for studying the mechanism of drug resistance. Notably, human esophageal cancer cells were resistant to KYT0353, in spite that LAT1 is upregulated in these cells[29]. Thus, although the mechanism by which CG31157 contributes to LAT1 inhibition by BCH and KYT0353 is currently unknown, future studies on the underlying mechanisms could contribute to improve drug resistance in cancer therapies.

In this study, we found that co-activation of JNK and Yki leads to upregulation of JhI-21 in Drosophila imaginal discs. The mechanism by which JNK and Yki induce JhI-21 expression is currently unknown, which should be addressed in the future studies. Nonetheless, JNK activation has been shown to be essential for tumor growth and invasion in Drosophila malignant tumors[16] and JNK activation has long been implicated in tumor growth and progression in mammalian systems[3032], underscoring the critical role of JNK in tumor progression. Indeed, hyperactivation of JNK signaling, as well as elevated YAP activity, have been reported in many human cancers[24,32]. Given that signaling molecules identified in this study are all conserved in humans, similar tumor progression mechanism via JNK and YAP-mediated LAT1 induction could regulate human cancers.

Materials and methods

Drosophila strains and genetics

Fly stocks were cultured at room temperature or 25°C on standard fly food. Fluorescently-labeled mitotic clones[33,34] were produced in larval imaginal discs using the following strains: eyFLP1; TubGal80, FRT40A; Act> y+ >Gal4, UAS-GFP (40A tester); eyFLP1; Act> y+ >Gal4, UAS-GFP; FRT82B, TubGal80 (82B tester); FRT19A, Tub-Gal80; eyFRP5, Act>y+>Gal4, UAS-GFP; sb/TM6B (19A tester). Additional strains used are as follows: UAS-RasV12 (BL4847, BL5788), UAS-bantam (BL60672), UAS-JhI-21-RNAi (BL41706), UAS-Rab5DN (BL42704), UAS-YkiS168A (BL28818), UAS-Rheb-RNAi (BL33966), rab5LL00467 (DGRC, Kyoto Institute of Technology), UAS-JhI-21-RNAi (VDRC108509), UAS-CG31157-RNAi (VDRC30296), UAS-BskDN (T. Adachi-Yamada), scrib1 (D. Bilder)[35], UAS-EigerW, UAS-Eiger12 (M. Miura), dlgm52 (N. Perrimon), UAS-Wts (T. Xu).

CG31157 was PCR-amplified from cDNA of w1118 adult flies using primers designed to append restriction sites for enzymes EcoR1 and Xbal to the 5’ and 3’ end of the product. Sequence of the products were confirmed and then the product was cloned into the pUAST vector. Transgenic flies were generated by WellGenetics.

Immunohistochemistry

Larval tissues were stained with standard immunohistochemical procedures using rabbit anti-JhI-21[23] (1:100; Dr. Grosjean; in Can Get Signal Immunoreaction Enhancer Solution A), rabbit anti-Phospho-S6[36] (1:400; J. Chung). Secondary antibodies used: anti-rabbit Alexafluor 546 or 647 (1:250). Samples were mounted with DAPI-containing SlowFade Gold Antifade Reagent (Molecular Probes). Images were taken with a Leica SP5. Clone size and intensity of anti-JhI-21 or anti-pS6 in GFP+ cells were measured using ImageJ. Graphs were drawn by using ggplot2 package of R.

RNA-seq data analysis

Reads were trimmed to 75 nucleotides length by fastx_trimmer in FASTX Toolkit (v0.0.14), and further quality-filtered by trim_galore (v0.5.0) with default setting to remove the adaptor sequence and the low quality reads. The reads passing filters were mapped to the Drosophila melanogaster Ensembl BDGP6 obtained from illumine iGenomes by STAR (v2.7.0e)[37]. >80% of reads were uniquely mapped for each experiment. The number of reads that map to each gene was counted by htseq-count (HTSeq v0.11.2) with -s reverse option[38]. Normalization was carried out using calcNormFactors function (edgeR)[39,40]. Differentially expressed genes were identified using glmQLFit and glmQLFTest function in edgeR at a FDR threshold 0.05. R version 3.6.0, edgeR_3.26.1 limma_3.40.0.

Chemicals

BCH (8.0 mg/ml in water; Cayman Chemical), KYT 0353 (JPH203, 7.4 mg/ml in 40% (w/v) Captisol (CyDex Pharmaceuticals); Tocris) was supplemented in fly food. Flies were cultured with drug-containing food for 1 days and then grown in the vial with normal food.

Western blot analysis

The third instar larvae were dissected in 1x PBS and eye-antennal discs (35~40) were put into 30 ul 2x sample buffer (4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.125M Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 0.005% BPB, 12% 2-mercaptoethanol). After homogenization at 100°C for 5 min, samples were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min. Lysates for the Western blot analysis were made by the supernatant. Primary antibodies used are as follows: p-4E-BP1 (Thr37/46, 1:500 in 5%BSA/TBST (0.1% Tween20 in TBS), rabbit mAb, cell signaling #2855S), monoclonal anti-α-Tubulin (1:2000 in Can get signal solution1, SIGMA T5168-2ML). Secondary antibodies used are as follows: anti-mouse IgG, HRP-linked antibody (1:10000 in Can get signal solution2, cell signaling #7076S). Images were taken with a LAS-4000 GE.

Statistical analysis

The areas of GFP-labeled clones were measured by ImageJ. Statistical analysis was performed using Prims9. All experiments shown in the same graph were done at the same time. N.S P(>0.12), * P(0.033), ** P(0.002) and *** P<0.001. All statistical data were summarized in S3 Table.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. An RNAi screen for the common pathway of tumorigenesis.

(a, c, e, h, i, j and k) Eye-antennal disc bearing GFP-labeled rab5-/- (a), bantam (c), bantam/rab5-/- (e), bantam/Rab5DN (h and i), and bantam/Rab5DN +JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271) (j and k) clones are shown. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. (b and d) Images of cephalic complexes, which include brain and the ventral nerve cord (VNC). (f) The average size of Wild-type (n = 26), rab5-/- (n = 40), bantam/rab5-/- (n = 33), and bantam (n = 18) clones were measured by ImageJ. (g) The average size of clones of GFP-labeled RasV12/dlg-/- (n = 35), RasV12/dlg-/- +cac-RNAi (n = 29), RasV12/dlg-/- +Cam-RNAi (n = 32), RasV12/scrib-/- (n = 41), and RasV12/scrib-/- +mnd-RNAi (n = 25) clones were measured by ImageJ. (l) The average size of Wild-type (n = 26), bantam/Rab5DN (n = 23), and bantam/Rab5DN +JhI-21RNAi (HMS02271) (n = 25) clones were measured by ImageJ. Scale bars, 50 μm. See S3 Table for details of statistical analyses.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Upregulation of JhI-21 is required for tumor growth.

(a) Quantitative RT-PCR revealed equal JhI-21 mRNA expression levels among genotypes. Statistics analyses see S3 Table. (b, d and g) GFP-labeled bantam/rab5-/- clones were induced in eye-antennal discs and were stained with anti-JhI-21 antibody (b), anti-MMP1 (a JNK target) antibody (d) or anti-β-galactosidase antibody to detect Yki-target fj-lacZ expression (g). (c and f) GFP-labeled RasV12/scrib-/- clones were induced in eye-antennal discs and were stained with anti-MMP1 antibody (c) or anti-β-galactosidase antibody to detect Yki-target ex-lacZ expression (f). (e) GFP-labeled bantam/rab5-/- + BskDN clones were induced in eye-antennal discs and were stained with anti-JhI-21 antibody. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bars, 50 μm.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. mTOR-S6 signaling upregulated in tumor cells.

(a, b, c, d e and f) GFP-labeled Wild-type (a), scrib-/- (b), RasV12 (c), rab5-/- (d), bantam (e), and RasV12/dlg-/- (f) clones were induced in eye-antennal disc and were stained with anti-pS6 antibody. (g) The averaged normalized intensity of anti-pS6 in antennal GFP+ cells in each genotype: Wild-type (n = 17), scrib-/- (n = 15), RasV12 (n = 10), rab5-/- (n = 18), bantam (n = 7). (h) The average normalized intensity of anti-p4EBP in antennal discs in each genotype: Wild-type (n = 3), RasV12/scrib-/- (n = 3), RasV12/scrib-/- +JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271) (n = 3) and normalized by α-Tubulin. The intensity was measured by ImageJ. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bars, 50 μm. See S3 Table for details of statistical analyses.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Effects of LAT1 inhibitors on tumor growth.

(a and b) Quantification of average sizes of GFP+ clones of RasV12/scrib-/- (day7) after larval administration of different dosages BCH (a) or KYT0353 (b). (a) RasV12/scrib-/- (None, n = 41) RasV12/scrib-/- (0.2mg/ml, n = 42) RasV12/scrib-/- (0.3mg/ml, n = 68) RasV12/scrib-/- (0.4mg/ml, n = 17). (b) RasV12/scrib-/- (Vehicle, n = 24) RasV12/scrib-/- (0.1mg/ml, n = 40) RasV12/scrib-/- (0.2mg/ml, n = 28) RasV12/scrib-/- (0.3mg/ml, n = 40). (c) The averaged normalized intensity of anti-pS6 in antennal GFP+ cells in each genotype: RasV12/scrib-/- (n = 22), RasV12/scrib-/- +BCH (0.3mg/ml) (n = 25), bantam/rab5-/- (n = 15), bantam/rab5-/- +BCH (0.3mg/ml) (n = 18). The intensity was measured by ImageJ. (d and e) Images of cephalic complexes, which include brain and the VNC. GFP-labeled RasV12/dlg-/- + bantam clones were induced in eye-antennal disc and the larvae were administrated with Vehicle or KYT0353 (0.2mg/ml) (images are cephalic complexes at day 7). (f) GFP-labeled CG31157-RNAi (GD3640)-expressing clones were induced in eye-antennal disc. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bars, 50 μm. (g) The average size of Wild-type (n = 26) and CG31157-RNAi (GD3640) (n = 11) clones were measured by ImageJ. (h) Quantification of average sizes of GFP+ clones of RasV12/scrib-/- (day7, n = 23) or RasV12/scrib-/- +CG31157-RNAi (KK111271) (day7, n = 23) after larval administration of BCH. See S3 Table for details of statistical analyses.

(TIF)

S1 Table. RNA-seq data for RasV12/scrib-/- and bantam/rab5-/- cell clones mosaically induced in the eye-antennal discs.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. RNA-seq data for bantam-overexpressing cell clones mosaically induced in the eye-antennal discs.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Summary of statistical analyses.

(XLSX)

S1 Text. Detailed genotypes used in each figure.

(DOCX)

S2 Text. Supplementary methods.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Enomoto, Y. Sanaki, K. Taniguchi, and H. Kanda for discussions, Minoru Koijima, Miho Tanaka for technical assistance, and NGS core facility of the Graduate Schools of Biostudies, Kyoto University for supporting the RNA-seq analysis. We also thank M. Miura, T. Adachi-Yamada, D. Bilder, T. Xu, N. Perrimon, the Bloomington Stock Center, the National Institute of Genetics Stock Center (NIG-FLY), the Drosophila Genetic Resource Center (DGRC, Kyoto Institute of Technology), and the VDRC Stock Center for fly stocks, and Y. Grosjean for anti-JhI-21 antibody.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (Grant No. 20H00515) to T.I, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Project for Elucidating and Controlling Mechanisms of Aging and Longevity; Grant No. 21gm5010001) to T.I, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (Grant No. 20H05320) to T.I, Grant-in-Aid for Transformative Research Areas A (Grant No. 20H05945 and 21H05284) to S.O and T.I, JST Moonshot R&D (Grant No. JPMJMS2022) to S.O, the Naito Foundation to S.O and T.I, the Takeda Science Foundation to S.O and T.I, Toray Science Foundation to S.O, and MSD Life Science Foundation to S.O. B.C was supported by JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientists. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Kanai Y, Segawa H, Miyamoto KI, Uchino H, Takeda E, Endou H. Expression cloning and characterization of a transporter for large neutral amino acids activated by the heavy chain of 4F2 antigen (CD98). J Biol Chem. 1998;273: 23629–23632. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.37.23629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Salisbury TB, Arthur S. The regulation and function of the L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19: 1–10. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang Q, Holst J. L-type amino acid transport and cancer: Targeting the mTORC1 pathway to inhibit neoplasia. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5: 1281–1294. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yue M, Jiang J, Gao P, Liu H, Qing G. Oncogenic MYC Activates a Feedforward Regulatory Loop Promoting Essential Amino Acid Metabolism and Tumorigenesis. Cell Rep. 2017;21: 3819–3832. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tomblin JK, Arthur S, Primerano DA, Chaudhry AR, Fan J, Denvir J, et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) regulation of L-Type Amino Acid Transporter 1 (LAT-1) expression in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2016;106: 94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.02.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Häfliger P, Charles RP. The l-type amino acid transporter LAT1—an emerging target in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20: 1–14. doi: 10.3390/ijms20102428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pagliarini RA, Xu T. A Genetic Screen in Drosophila for Metastatic Behavior. Science (80-). 2003;302: 1227–1231. doi: 10.1126/science.1088474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brumby AM, Richardson HE. scribble mutants cooperate with oncogenic Ras or Notch to cause neoplastic overgrowth in Drosophila. EMBO J. 2003;22: 5769–5779. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hirabayashi S, Baranski TJ, Cagan RL. XTransformed drosophila cells evade diet-mediated insulin resistance through wingless signaling. Cell. 2013;154: 664–675. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hariharan IK, Bilder D. Regulation of Imaginal Disc Growth by Tumor-Suppressor Genes in Drosophila. Annu Rev Genet. 2006;40: 335–361. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.100738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zerial M, McBride H. Rab proteins as membrane organizers. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2: 107–117. doi: 10.1038/35052055 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Uhlirova M, Bohmann D. JNK- and Fos-regulated Mmp1 expression cooperates with Ras to induce invasive tumors in Drosophila. EMBO J. 2006;25: 5294–5304. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martín-Blanco E, Gampel A, Ring J, Virdee K, Kirov N, Tolkovsky AM, et al. puckered encodes a phosphatase that mediates a feedback loop regulating JNK activity during dorsal closure in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1998;12: 557–670. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.4.557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang YH, Huang ML. Organogenesis and tumorigenesis: Insight from the JAK/STAT pathway in the Drosophila eye. Dev Dyn. 2010;239: 2522–2533. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pan D. The hippo signaling pathway in development and cancer. Dev Cell. 2010;19: 491–505. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.09.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Igaki T, Pagliarini RA, Xu T. Loss of Cell Polarity Drives Tumor Growth and Invasion through JNK Activation in Drosophila. Curr Biol. 2006;16: 1139–1146. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.04.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Amoyel M, Anderson AM, Bach EA. JAK/STAT pathway dysregulation in tumors: A Drosophila perspective. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2014;28: 96–103. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.03.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Doggett K, Grusche FA, Richardson HE, Brumby AM. Loss of the Drosophila cell polarity regulator Scribbled promotes epithelial tissue overgrowth and cooperation with oncogenic Ras-Raf through impaired Hippo pathway signaling. BMC Dev Biol. 2011;11. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-11-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Reynolds B, Rovers P, Laynes R, Kazi S, Boyd CAR, Goberdhan DCI. Drosophila expresses a CD98 transporter with an evolutionarily conserved structure and amino acid-transport properties. Biochem J. 2009;420: 363–372. doi: 10.1042/BJ20082198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Igaki T, Kanda H, Yamamoto-Goto Y, Kanuka H, Kuranaga E, Aigaki T, et al. Eiger, a TNF superfamily ligand that triggers the Drosophila JNK pathway. EMBO J. 2002;21: 3009–3018. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdf306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Eduardo Moreno MY, Konrad B. Evolution of TNF Signaling Mechanisms: JNK-Dependent Apoptosis Triggered by Eiger, the Drosophila homolog of the TNF superfamily. Curr Biol. 2002;12: 1263–1268. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00954-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Huang J, Wu S, Barrera J, Matthews K, Pan D. The Hippo signaling pathway coordinately regulates cell proliferation and apoptosis by inactivating Yorkie, the Drosophila homolog of YAP. Cell. 2005;122: 421–434. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ziegler AB, Manière G, Grosjean Y. JhI-21 plays a role in Drosophila insulin-like peptide release from larval IPCs via leucine transport. Sci Rep. 2018;8: 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17765-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Laplante M, Sabatini DM. MTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell. 2012;149: 274–293. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Magnuson B, Ekim B, Fingar DC. Regulation and function of ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K) within mTOR signalling networks. Biochem J. 2012;441: 1–21. doi: 10.1042/BJ20110892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Heesom KJ, Denton RM. Dissociation of the eukaryotic initiation factor-4E/4E-BP1 complex involves phosphorylation of 4E-BP1 by an mTOR-associated kinase. FEBS Lett. 1999;457: 489–493. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)01094-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Manière G, Ziegler AB, Geillon F, Featherstone DE, Grosjean Y. Direct Sensing of Nutrients via a LAT1-like Transporter in Drosophila Insulin-Producing Cells. Cell Rep. 2016;17: 137–148. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.08.093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee WH, Higuchi H, Ikeda S, Macke EL, Takimoto T, Pattnaik BR, et al. Mouse Tmem135 mutation reveals a mechanism involving mitochondrial dynamics that leads to age-dependent retinal pathologies. Elife. 2016;5: 1–29. doi: 10.7554/eLife.19264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Muto Y, Furihata T, Kaneko M, Higuchi K, Okunushi K, Morio H, et al. Different response profiles of gastrointestinal cancer cells to an L-type amino acid transporter inhibitor, JPH203. Anticancer Res. 2019;39: 159–165. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bode AM, Dong Z. The functional contrariety of JNK. Mol Carcinog. 2007;46: 591–598. doi: 10.1002/mc.20348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bubici C, Papa S. JNK signalling in cancer: In need of new, smarter therapeutic targets. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171: 24–37. doi: 10.1111/bph.12432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wu Q, Wu W, Fu B, Shi L, Wang X, Kuca K. JNK signaling in cancer cell survival. Med Res Rev. 2019;39: 2082–2104. doi: 10.1002/med.21574 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xu T, Rubin GM. Analysis of genetic mosaics in developing and adult Drosophila tissues. Development. 1993;117: 1223–1237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lee T, Luo L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible neurotechnique cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron. 1999;22: 451–461. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80701-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bilder D, Li M, Perrimon N. Cooperative regulation of cell polarity and growth by Drosophila tumor suppressors. Science (80-). 2000;289: 113–116. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5476.113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim W, Jang YG, Yang J, Chung J. Spatial Activation of TORC1 Is Regulated by Hedgehog and E2F1 Signaling in the Drosophila Eye. Dev Cell. 2017;42: 363–375.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2017.07.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29: 15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq-A Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31: 166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2009;26: 139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Smyth GK. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40: 4288–4297. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Peter McKinnon, Norbert Perrimon

9 Oct 2020

Dear Tatsushi,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'JNK and Yorkie drive tumor malignancy by inducing L-amino acid transporter 1 in Drosophila.' to PLOS Genetics. Your manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important problem, but raised some substantial concerns about the current manuscript. Based on the reviews, we will not be able to accept this version of the manuscript, but we would be willing to review again a much-revised version. We cannot, of course, promise publication at that time.

Should you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration here, your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. We will also require a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

If you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration at PLOS Genetics, please aim to resubmit within the next 60 days, unless it will take extra time to address the concerns of the reviewers, in which case we would appreciate an expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments are included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see our guidelines.

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool.  PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, use the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

We are sorry that we cannot be more positive about your manuscript at this stage. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any concerns or questions.

Yours sincerely,

Norbert Perrimon

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Peter McKinnon

Section Editor: Cancer Genetics

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: In this study, to characterize the common oncogenesis pathways, Cong et al compared differentially-expressed genes between RasV12/scrib-/- and bantam/rab5-/- larval disc tumors and identified JhI-21, a fly homolog of LAT1 that senses Leucine availability, as a crucial regulator for the growth of both of them. They further found that JhI-21 expression is commonly increased by JNK and yki signaling pathways to increase mTOR activity and promote growth in these two tumors. However, when authors fed larvae LAT1 inhibitors to try to inhibit Jhl-21 activity, they interestingly uncovered that the growth of only RasV12/scrib-/- tumors, but not bantam/rab5-/- tumors, was suppressed. Finally, combining RNA-seq and RNAi, they indicated the molecular mechanism(s) of drug resistance in bantam/rab5-/- tumors, whereby bantam suppresses the expression of CG31157, a TMEM135-like gene, to diminish effects of LAT1 inhibitors in the larval disc tumors.

Given the known fact that LAT1/2 mediates Leucine uptake, mTOR activation and tumor progression in mammals, this work provides novel findings of differential drug effects in two different tumors, mimicking genetic complexity and heterogenous nature of mammalian tumors. The authors also preliminarily indicated that bantam/CG31157 axis could be the key regulator of drug resistance, which could be possibly translated into future human cancer treatment. However, the current results of Leucine sensing, Jhi-21 inhibition, and CG31157 functions still are quite obscure. I recommend a major revision prior to the publication in Plos Genetics.

Major comments:

1. Multiple RNAi lines or mutants of JhI-21 and CG31157 should be used to exclude the off-target effects. In this study, only a single RNAi line for either JhI-21 or CG31157 was not sufficient to conclude the loss-of-function effects.

2. As indicated in Grosjean’s work, a poor medium supplied with Leucine is recommended to validate Leucine/JhI-21 axis in tumor growth regulation.

3. Although BCH has been previously shown to slow down Leucine uptake, the effects of Kyt-0353/JPH203 were not well evaluated in Drosophila. Because the drug concentrations in the fly food are so high (0.3 mg/mL BCH equals 2 mM, 0.2 mg/mL KYT-0353 equals 4 mM), different dosages should be tested.

On the other hand, the larvae were fed inhibitors simultaneously with tumor induction. The authors actually compared pS6 levels in the normal cells and well-expanded tumors, but not tumor responses to inhibitors. Therefore, the short-term feeding of drugs should be performed. For example, larvae are normally cultured for 6-9 days to develop disc tumors and then are fed drugs for 12 or 24 hours to evaluate pS6 levels in the tumors.

In vitro assays that treat isolated disc tumors with Leucine and different drugs are also recommended.

4. The drug effects in bantam/rab5-/- tumors with CG31157 overexpression should be examined.

Minor comments:

5. The mechanism(s) whereby JhI-21 expression is induced by JNK plus yki is quite interesting. However, the inducers for JNK (Eiger) and yki (yki.S168A) signaling pathways are weak ones and reflect neither signaling activations and progression in two tumors. Please used HepAC and yki.S111A.S168A.S250A. Otherwise, they can not conclude “JNK or yki activation alone did not induce JhI-21 expression”.

6. The relationships between CD98C/CG2791, Mnd, and JhI-21 have been studied to elucidate the functional regulation by heterodimeric complexes in leucine exchange in Drosophila. The authors should include them in both introduction and discussion sections to offer a general understanding of LAT physiology.

Reviewer #2: Igaki and colleagues use the power of Drosophila genetics and two different neoplastic tumor models to identify a role of JhI-21, a fly homolog of LAT1, a Leucine transporter, in tumor growth and malignancy. Authors use two different model systems of epithelial malignant transformation (first, the combination of an activated form of Ras: RasV12 and loss or apical-basal polarity determinants and, second, overexpression of a dominant negative form of Rab5 and overexpression of the bantam miRNA) to search, through transcriptional genomics, for genes upregulated in the two different conditions and whose depletion affetcs tumor growth. Authors make use of genetics and chemical inhibitors to unravel a role of LAT1 in tumor growth by promoting TOR signaling. Interestingly, authors identify a role of bantam miRNA in targeting CG31157, which encodes a TMEM135-like protein, and inducing resistance of these tumors to LAT1 inhibitors. The ms is well written, figures self-explanatory and the finding of LAT1 as a gene upregulated in fly tumors with a role in tumor growth will certainly contribute to the understanding of the role of the upregulation of this gene in human cancer. The identification CG31157 will also help identifying vulnerabilities of these tumors too. I have, though, two major concerns on the paper that should be addressed by the authors:

Major points:

(1) Antibody against JhI-21 should be validated in overexpression experiments (in tissues overexpressing Jlh-21 with the GAL4/UAS system). It was not validated in the original paper either. Authors should show by other means the upregulation of Jhl-21 in malignant cells (eg. in situ hybridization or GFP reporters?)

(2) JhI-21 knockdown affects the growth of the clones. I thus wonder whether the rescue of the growth of malignant clones could be a simple consequence of Jlh1 being required for cell survival or growth of normal cells. Have authors tried to use other JhI-21 RNAis not affecting the growth of control clones?

Minor points:

(3) Activation of the TOR pathway should be validated in western blots

(4) Code numbers in fly stocks should be included.

(5) A section on statistics should be added to M&M.

(6) A wild type eye should be added to Figure 1 for comparison.

Reviewer #3: This manuscript explores the control of cell growth in Drosophila neoplastic tumours. A strong upregulation of the TOR pathway is identified by pS6 staining, and this is attributed to a very mild upregulation of LAT1 amino-acid transporter.

The basic problem is that the magnitude of the induction of LAT1 is very, very small compared with the magnitude of the pS6 induction, which means that the authors have not identified the actual mechanism primarily responsible for inducing TOR activation in these tumours. Thus, I cannot support publication.

Reviewer #4: Cong and colleagues investigate tissue growth control in Drosophila imaginal discs. They use several well studied genetic combinations (RAS, Hippo, scribble, Rab5, bantam) that perturb cell polarity and proliferation. The power of the study is the unbiased RNA-sequencing experiment and subsequent mini genetic screen where they identify genes that can partially reverse the epithelia tumor overgrowth that is caused by perturbing these factors. They identify the Juvenile hormone Inducible-21 (JhI-21), a Drosophila homolog of the L-amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1), as a gene that is elevated in the tumors and required for their growth. They propose that JNK and the Hippo protein Yorkie drive its expression and that Jhl-21 induces the Tor pathway to drive tumor growth. They further explore the role of the microRNA bantam in these tumors.

The study is interesting and the screen is powerful. They use many approaches and experiments that they and others have employed in other studies, and often repeat published results (e.g. warts expression can suppress RAS/scribble tumors). They have some interesting observations that specialists within the Drosophila tumor field will appreciate. At this stage I don’t think the manuscript will be of substantial interest to non-specialists. The major shortfall of the study is that the mechanism they have out forward for how the different factors intersect (Hippo, polarity, Jhl-21, Tor etc. is not well substantiated and hard to reconcile. The paper reads more like a conglomeration of interesting observations than a pithy dissection/discovery of a new feature of epithelial tissue growth. However, I think the paper will help to shape the studies of others in the fly epithelial tissue growth field, although the manuscript requires far more effort to properly present and discuss the data. In particular, the authors to validate their Jhl-21 experiments by using independent RNAi line and/or mutants, and provide validation of the Jhl-21 antibody. Comments that should help to improve the manuscript are:

Introduction:

This needs more text to properly introduce the study. Also, it jumps too abruptly from para 1 to para 2. Given that LAT1 was found in an unbiased fashion it is probably better introduced at the end of the introduction.

Similarly, the Discussion is very brief and does not adequately discuss the findings of the study, their significance and limitations and important areas to address in the future.

The Jhl-21 RNAi line used should be verified with protein expression and/or RNA experiments, to prove that it targets Jhl-21 expression. They can verify the Jhl-21 antibody in imaginal discs and the RNAi line in one experiment.

At least one other Jhl-21 RNAi line should be used to verify the experiments presented in this paper. Alternatively, a mutant allele should be used.

Rheb mutant alleles impair cell growth and proliferation. Why does Rheb RNAi give no phenotype in Figure 3. Has it been proven to deplete Rheb levels? If not, this should be done.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: No

Decision Letter 1

Peter McKinnon, Norbert Perrimon

22 Jun 2021

Dear Dr Igaki,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'JNK and Yorkie drive tumor malignancy by inducing L-amino acid transporter 1 in Drosophila.' to PLOS Genetics.

The manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important problem, but raised some substantial concerns about the revised manuscript. Based on the reviews, we will not be able to accept this version of the manuscript, but we would be willing to review a much-revised version. We cannot, of course, promise publication at that time. The three significant issues that need to be addressed are: 1.  Statistics; 2. Specificity of the antibody against JhI-21; and 3. the strongly increased TOR activation attributed to the  very mild upregulation of LAT1 in tumor. We encourage you to provide a revised manuscript that addresses these important issues.

Should you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration here, your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. We will also require a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

If you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration at PLOS Genetics, please aim to resubmit within the next 60 days, unless it will take extra time to address the concerns of the reviewers, in which case we would appreciate an expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments are included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool.  PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, use the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

We are sorry that we cannot be more positive about your manuscript at this stage. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any concerns or questions.

Yours sincerely,

Norbert Perrimon

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Peter McKinnon

Section Editor: Cancer Genetics

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: I think the authors have addressed all of my comments and recommend the acceptance for this manuscript.

Reviewer #2: Authors have addressed satisfactorily some of my previous concerns. I still have two major issues:

(!) I do believe authors should take statistics more seriously. First, Student t-test statistical analysis is not correct in most cases and authors should use alternative ones such as Dunnet's due to the presence of more than one experimental set. Second, authors should include a supplementary table where all data are summarised: n, p values, statistical analysis used, mean, standard deviation and p values for all figure panels where a quantification is being done. Third, authors should explicitly explain which program was used to perform the statistical analysis and say whether all experiments were done the same time. Fourth, I wonder whether the same Ras/scrib control was used to analyse the impact of two RNAis to rescue clone size in Figure 1o. I hope the answer is no. If so, two different control bars should be included or the second set of experiments where RAS/scrib clone size was compared to the new set of clones in the presence of the new RNAi.

(2) I am not convinced with the answer to my concern on the antibody against JhI-21. Have authors tested whether the protein can be detected with an antibody to HA: when the UAS-JhI-21.ORF.3xHA.GW transgene is over expressed with the GAL4/UAS system? There are EP-lines available. Can authors test in this case?

Reviewer #3: The authors still didn't address the basic problem. It is no surprise that you need amino acid transport for TOR activation. The problem is that they attribute the strongly increased TOR activation in their tumours to a very mild upregulation of LAT1, which is just not a well supported conclusion.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Decision Letter 2

Peter McKinnon, Norbert Perrimon

19 Oct 2021

Dear Dr Igaki,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "JNK and Yorkie drive tumor malignancy by inducing L-amino acid transporter 1 in Drosophila." has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional acceptance, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about making your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Norbert Perrimon

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Peter McKinnon

Section Editor: Cancer Genetics

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #2: I thank authors for having taken the statistics more seriously after this round of revision. I congratulate them for this nice paper.

Reviewer #3: The competing manuscript pointed out by the authors makes a strong case the LAT1 upregulation in APC mutant tumours is a conserved phenomenon. This strengthens the importance of their observations in Drosophila.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly: 

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-20-01337R2

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.

Acceptance letter

Peter McKinnon, Norbert Perrimon

9 Nov 2021

PGENETICS-D-20-01337R2

JNK and Yorkie drive tumor malignancy by inducing L-amino acid transporter 1 in Drosophila

Dear Dr Igaki,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "JNK and Yorkie drive tumor malignancy by inducing L-amino acid transporter 1 in Drosophila" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Anita Estes

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. An RNAi screen for the common pathway of tumorigenesis.

    (a, c, e, h, i, j and k) Eye-antennal disc bearing GFP-labeled rab5-/- (a), bantam (c), bantam/rab5-/- (e), bantam/Rab5DN (h and i), and bantam/Rab5DN +JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271) (j and k) clones are shown. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. (b and d) Images of cephalic complexes, which include brain and the ventral nerve cord (VNC). (f) The average size of Wild-type (n = 26), rab5-/- (n = 40), bantam/rab5-/- (n = 33), and bantam (n = 18) clones were measured by ImageJ. (g) The average size of clones of GFP-labeled RasV12/dlg-/- (n = 35), RasV12/dlg-/- +cac-RNAi (n = 29), RasV12/dlg-/- +Cam-RNAi (n = 32), RasV12/scrib-/- (n = 41), and RasV12/scrib-/- +mnd-RNAi (n = 25) clones were measured by ImageJ. (l) The average size of Wild-type (n = 26), bantam/Rab5DN (n = 23), and bantam/Rab5DN +JhI-21RNAi (HMS02271) (n = 25) clones were measured by ImageJ. Scale bars, 50 μm. See S3 Table for details of statistical analyses.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Upregulation of JhI-21 is required for tumor growth.

    (a) Quantitative RT-PCR revealed equal JhI-21 mRNA expression levels among genotypes. Statistics analyses see S3 Table. (b, d and g) GFP-labeled bantam/rab5-/- clones were induced in eye-antennal discs and were stained with anti-JhI-21 antibody (b), anti-MMP1 (a JNK target) antibody (d) or anti-β-galactosidase antibody to detect Yki-target fj-lacZ expression (g). (c and f) GFP-labeled RasV12/scrib-/- clones were induced in eye-antennal discs and were stained with anti-MMP1 antibody (c) or anti-β-galactosidase antibody to detect Yki-target ex-lacZ expression (f). (e) GFP-labeled bantam/rab5-/- + BskDN clones were induced in eye-antennal discs and were stained with anti-JhI-21 antibody. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bars, 50 μm.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. mTOR-S6 signaling upregulated in tumor cells.

    (a, b, c, d e and f) GFP-labeled Wild-type (a), scrib-/- (b), RasV12 (c), rab5-/- (d), bantam (e), and RasV12/dlg-/- (f) clones were induced in eye-antennal disc and were stained with anti-pS6 antibody. (g) The averaged normalized intensity of anti-pS6 in antennal GFP+ cells in each genotype: Wild-type (n = 17), scrib-/- (n = 15), RasV12 (n = 10), rab5-/- (n = 18), bantam (n = 7). (h) The average normalized intensity of anti-p4EBP in antennal discs in each genotype: Wild-type (n = 3), RasV12/scrib-/- (n = 3), RasV12/scrib-/- +JhI-21-RNAi (HMS02271) (n = 3) and normalized by α-Tubulin. The intensity was measured by ImageJ. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bars, 50 μm. See S3 Table for details of statistical analyses.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Effects of LAT1 inhibitors on tumor growth.

    (a and b) Quantification of average sizes of GFP+ clones of RasV12/scrib-/- (day7) after larval administration of different dosages BCH (a) or KYT0353 (b). (a) RasV12/scrib-/- (None, n = 41) RasV12/scrib-/- (0.2mg/ml, n = 42) RasV12/scrib-/- (0.3mg/ml, n = 68) RasV12/scrib-/- (0.4mg/ml, n = 17). (b) RasV12/scrib-/- (Vehicle, n = 24) RasV12/scrib-/- (0.1mg/ml, n = 40) RasV12/scrib-/- (0.2mg/ml, n = 28) RasV12/scrib-/- (0.3mg/ml, n = 40). (c) The averaged normalized intensity of anti-pS6 in antennal GFP+ cells in each genotype: RasV12/scrib-/- (n = 22), RasV12/scrib-/- +BCH (0.3mg/ml) (n = 25), bantam/rab5-/- (n = 15), bantam/rab5-/- +BCH (0.3mg/ml) (n = 18). The intensity was measured by ImageJ. (d and e) Images of cephalic complexes, which include brain and the VNC. GFP-labeled RasV12/dlg-/- + bantam clones were induced in eye-antennal disc and the larvae were administrated with Vehicle or KYT0353 (0.2mg/ml) (images are cephalic complexes at day 7). (f) GFP-labeled CG31157-RNAi (GD3640)-expressing clones were induced in eye-antennal disc. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Scale bars, 50 μm. (g) The average size of Wild-type (n = 26) and CG31157-RNAi (GD3640) (n = 11) clones were measured by ImageJ. (h) Quantification of average sizes of GFP+ clones of RasV12/scrib-/- (day7, n = 23) or RasV12/scrib-/- +CG31157-RNAi (KK111271) (day7, n = 23) after larval administration of BCH. See S3 Table for details of statistical analyses.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. RNA-seq data for RasV12/scrib-/- and bantam/rab5-/- cell clones mosaically induced in the eye-antennal discs.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. RNA-seq data for bantam-overexpressing cell clones mosaically induced in the eye-antennal discs.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Table. Summary of statistical analyses.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Text. Detailed genotypes used in each figure.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Text. Supplementary methods.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses to Reviewers.ver.2.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses to Reviewers.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES